Search

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of omalizumab among adolescents with moderate-severe allergic asthma inadequately controlled with inhaled corticosteroids. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from patients 12 to 17 years of age were pooled from 5 placebo-controlled registration trials of omalizumab. Impact on asthma control was assessed by need for rescue bursts of oral corticosteroids, lung function, symptom scores, and unscheduled office visits. RESULTS: In adolescents (n = 146), addition of omalizumab decreased mean number of rescue bursts (0.3 vs 0.9) versus placebo; relative risk 0.47 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.99; P = .047). At study conclusion, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second increased 268 mL (13.8%) in omalizumab-treated subjects versus 98 mL (5.5%) for placebo (least squares mean treatment difference 146 mL [95% CI, 19.4-272.6; P = .024]). Omalizumab significantly improved asthma symptom scores and reduced unscheduled office visits. CONCLUSION: Omalizumab added to baseline therapy improves measures of asthma control in adolescents with persistent moderate-severe allergic asthma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Unlabelled: This is an integrated analysis of data from patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) aged 6-21 years who were treated with up to seven cycles of tobramycin powder for inhalation (TIP(TM) ) over a period of at least 1 year. Safety and key efficacy endpoints were analyzed., Results: The improvement in lung function and decrease in sputum P. aeruginosa (Pa) density from baseline were sustained over the 1-year treatment period. The number of adverse events (AEs) was low and did not increase with additional cycles of TIP treatment. Some increase in tobramycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was observed, but there was no significant increase in emergence of resistant strains based on the parenteral breakpoint for tobramycin., Conclusion: Efficacy of TIP was maintained for up to seven cycles. Long-term treatment with TIP was generally safe and well tolerated with no increase in AEs., (© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Approximately 45% of patients with chronic urticaria have an IgG autoantibody directed to the alpha-subunit of the high-affinity IgE receptor (chronic autoimmune urticaria, CAU) leading to cutaneous mast cell and basophil activation. Treatment of allergic asthma with omalizumab produces rapid reduction in free IgE levels and subsequent decrease in Fc epsilon RI expression on mast cells and basophils. If this occurs in CAU, cross-linking of IgE receptors by autoantibody would be less likely, reducing cell activation and urticaria/angioedema., Objective: To investigate the efficacy of omalizumab in patients with CAU symptomatic despite antihistamine therapy., Methods: Twelve patients with CAU, identified by basophil histamine release assay and autologous skin test, with persistent symptoms for at least 6 weeks despite antihistamines, were treated with placebo for 4 weeks followed by omalizumab (>or=0.016 mg/kg/IU mL(-1) IgE per month) every 2 or 4 weeks for 16 weeks. Primary efficacy variable was change from baseline to the final 4 weeks of omalizumab treatment in mean Urticaria Activity Score (UAS, 0-9 scale). Changes in rescue medication use and quality of life were assessed., Results: Mean UAS declined significantly from baseline to the final 4 weeks of omalizumab treatment (7.50 +/- 1.78 to 2.66 +/- 3.31, -4.84 +/- 2.86, P = .0002). Seven patients achieved complete symptom resolution. In 4 patients, mean UAS decreased, but urticaria persisted. One patient did not respond. Rescue medication use was reduced significantly, and quality of life improved. No adverse effects were reported or observed., Conclusion: This exploratory proof of concept study suggests omalizumab is an effective therapy for CAU resistant to antihistamines.

Asthma in older adults is under-recognized and possibly associated with allergic triggers. We conducted a pooled analysis of omalizumab double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to evaluate efficacy in older adults. Data for the total study population and subjects aged > or = 50 years with moderate-severe allergic asthma were examined. We used Poisson regression to analyze the number of asthma exacerbations and logistic regression to evaluate treatment effectiveness. Symptom scores and total rescue medication puffs were evaluated by analysis of covariance. Omalizumab reduced the risk of clinically significant asthma exacerbations, led to a significantly greater response in patient/investigator-reported global effectiveness, improved asthma symptom scores, and reduced rescue medication use in adults > or = 50 years with moderate-severe allergic asthma.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome is a complex group of signs and symptoms caused by direct or indirect lung injury. In spite of decades of research, it is still associated with a high mortality rate. Pathogenesis of this disease is related to alveolar endothelial and epithelial cell injury and associated release and sequestration of inflammatory mediators and cells, including cytokines and neutrophils, respectively. Pharmacologic interventions have been largely unsuccessful, and ventilation strategies to support oxygenation while limiting ventilator associated lung injury have not demonstrated any significant reductions in the mortality rate. However, novel therapies are in development, based on the knowledge of the pathologic processes of acute respiratory distress syndrome. In this article an overview of the disease process and mediator involvement is presented, followed by a review of pharmacologic and ventilation treatments currently in use or under study.

Objective: To assess the impact on preoperative laboratory investigations in elective surgery after the implementation of guidelines for ordering such tests., Design: A retrospective chart audit., Setting: A university teaching hospital., Patients: The charts of 903 patients who underwent an elective surgical procedure from each surgical specialty except cardiovascular and thoracic., Interventions: Implementation of guidelines for preoperative laboratory investigations., Main Outcome Measures: Impact on the preoperative use of laboratory investigations after implementation of the guidelines as well as patient morbidity and mortality., Results: The mean number of preoperative laboratory investigations done per patient decreased from 4.65 before implementation of the guidelines to 4.18 after (p < 0.001). There was no apparent adverse impact on patient morbidity or mortality., Conclusion: Implementation of guidelines for preoperative laboratory investigations for elective surgery resulted in a reduction in the number of tests without adverse impact on patient morbidity or mortality.