Search

Rationale and Objective Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in patients with COVID-19 and associated with poor outcomes. Urinary biomarkers have been associated with adverse kidney outcomes in other settings and may provide additional prognostic information in patients with COVID-19. We investigated the association between urinary biomarkers with adverse kidney outcomes among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Study Design Prospective cohort study. Setting and Participants Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (n=153) at 2 academic medical centers between April and June 2020. Exposures 19 urinary biomarkers of injury, inflammation, and repair. Outcomes Composite of KDIGO stage 3 AKI, requirement for dialysis, or death within 60 days of hospital admission. We also compared various kidney biomarker levels in the setting of COVID-19 versus other common AKI settings. Analytic Approach Time-varying Cox proportional hazards regression to associate biomarker level with composite outcome. Results Out of 153 patients, 24 (15.7%) experienced the primary outcome. Two-fold higher levels of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.14-1.57), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1) (HR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.09-1.84), and kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) (HR: 2.03; 95% CI: 1.38-2.99) were associated with highest risk of sustaining primary composite outcome. Higher epidermal growth factor (EGF) levels were associated with a lower risk of the primary outcome (HR 0.61; 95% CI: 0.47-0.79). Individual biomarkers provided moderate discrimination and biomarker combinations improved discrimination for the primary outcome. The degree of kidney injury by biomarker level in COVID-19 was comparable to other settings of clinical AKI. There was evidence of subclinical AKI in COVID-19 patients based on elevated injury biomarker level in patients without clinical AKI defined by serum creatinine. Limitations Small sample size with low number of composite outcome events. Conclusion Urinary biomarkers are associated with adverse kidney outcomes in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and may provide valuable information to monitor kidney disease progression and recovery., Graphical abstract

Background Scaling SARS-CoV-2 testing to meet demands of safe reopenings continues to be plagued by assay costs and supply chain shortages. In response, we developed SalivaDirect, which received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Methods We simplified our saliva-based diagnostic test by (1) not requiring collection tubes with preservatives, (2) replacing nucleic acid extraction with a simple enzymatic and heating step, and (3) testing specimens with a dualplex qRT-PCR assay. Moreover, we validated SalivaDirect with reagents and instruments from multiple vendors to minimize supply chain issues. Findings From our hospital cohort, we show a high positive agreement (94%) between saliva tested with SalivaDirect and nasopharyngeal swabs tested with a commercial qRT-PCR kit. In partnership with the National Basketball Association (NBA) and National Basketball Players Association (NBPA), we tested 3,779 saliva specimens from healthy individuals and detected low rates of invalid (0.3%) and false-positive (, Context and Significance Frequent testing is critical to limit SARS-CoV-2 transmission. In response to this need, we developed SalivaDirect, a sensitive, simplified, and flexible testing framework, which received Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). We tested saliva collected from a hospital cohort and showed a high positive agreement (94%) as compared to paired nasopharyngeal swabs tested with a commercial diagnostic kit. Then, we partnered with the National Basketball Association (NBA) to test a large cohort of mostly healthy individuals, and we detected low rates of invalid (0.3%) and false-positive (0.03%–0.05%) results. Our study shows that SalivaDirect can help to increase testing capacity by providing access to an affordable framework that is less prone to supply chain shortages., Graphical Abstract, Highlights SalivaDirect is a simplified saliva-based test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 The testing framework is flexible to minimize the risk of supply chain issues SalivaDirect is sensitive, with low rates of invalid and false-positive results Laboratories can be designated to use SalivaDirect to increase testing capacity, SalivaDirect is a sensitive saliva-based COVID-19 diagnostic test, which received Emergency Use Authorization from the U.S. FDA. With the ability to designate other laboratories, the flexible and simplified framework helps to increase the capacity of existing laboratory infrastructure for SARS-CoV-2 testing.