Search

Background Febrile neutropenia (FN) after chemotherapy is a major cause of morbidity during cancer treatment. The performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of circulating cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid from plasma may be superior to blood culture (BC) diagnostics for identification of causative pathogens. The aim of this study was to validate mNGS (DISQVER test) for the detection of pathogens in hematologic patients with FN. Methods We collected paired whole blood specimens from central venous catheter and peripheral vein during FN for BC and mNGS testing. We repeated paired sampling at the earliest after 3 days of fever, which was defined as 1 FN episode. All clinical data were retrospectively reviewed by an infectious disease expert panel. We calculated percent positive agreement (PPA), percent negative agreement (PNA), percent overall agreement (POA), and sensitivity and specificity. Results We analyzed a total of 98 unselected FN episodes in 61 patients who developed predominantly FN after conditioning therapy for allogeneic (n = 22) or autologous (n = 21) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Success rate of mNGS was 99% (97 of 98). Positivity rate of mNGS was 43% (42 of 97) overall and 32% (31 of 97) excluding viruses compared to 14% (14 of 98) in BC. The PPA, PNA, and POA between mNGS and BC were 84.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54.6% to 98.1%), 63.1% (95% CI, 51.9% to 73.4%), and 66% (95% CI, 55.7% to 75.3%), respectively. Sensitivity for bacteria or fungi was 40% (95% CI, 28.0% to 52.9%) and 18.5% (95% CI, 9.9% to 30.0%), respectively. Conclusions Pathogen detection by mNGS (DISQVER) during unselected FN episodes shows 2-fold higher sensitivity and a broader pathogen spectrum than BC.

Background A combination of rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is the standard first-line therapy for diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common aggressive lymphoma in adults. One of the major adverse effects of this regimen is vincristine-induced polyneuropathy which leads to discontinuation of vincristine in up to 30% of DLBCL-patients. Dose reduction of vincristine might worsen treatment outcomes of DLBCL but identification of treatment alternatives for patients exhibiting peripheral neuropathy during R-CHOP is an unmet need in hematology. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, comprising 987 patients with de novo DLBCL, we delineated the role of vinorelbine as a substitute for vincristine in R-CHOP by measuring improvements in neuropathy and outcome variables. Results Five-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 72.6% and 63.1% in patients who received regular doses of vincristine, as compared to 60.6% and 51.7% in patients who received reduced doses of vincristine (p = 0.022 and p = 0.003, respectively). Of 199 patients who switched to vinorelbine, the majority experienced an improvement of neuropathy Furthermore, vinorelbine-switched patients showed favorable oncologic outcomes. Conclusion Replacement of vincristine by vinorelbine due to neuropathy is effective and safe, and results in a significant improvement in neuropathy as compared to treatment with R-CHOP.