Search

Supplementary Table S1. Results of the summary evaluation on the risk of bias assessment, using the domain-based evaluation of the Cochrane risk of bias tool: low, unclear, and high risk of bias are the 3 possible judgments for each item considered of each of the study assessed. Supplementary Table S2. Detailed results of the risk of bias assessment on the NEOALTTO study (ref. 39). Supplementary Table S3. Detailed results of the risk of bias assessment on the CALGB 40601 study (ref. 40). Supplementary Table S4. Detailed results of the risk of bias assessment on the NSABP B-41 study (ref. 41). Supplementary Table S5. Detailed results of the risk of bias assessment on the EORTC 10054 study (ref. 42). Supplementary Table S6. Detailed results of the risk of bias assessment on the TRIO-US B07 study (ref. 43). Supplementary Table S7. Detailed results of the risk of bias assessment on the CHERLOB study (ref. 44).

Purpose: (Neo)adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy plus trastuzumab reduces recurrence and death risk in HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. Randomized trials assessed HER2 dual block by adding lapatinib to trastuzumab and chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting using pathologic complete response (pCR) as the outcome measure. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials testing neoadjuvant dual block with lapatinib and trastuzumab versus trastuzumab alone in HER2+ breast cancer.Experimental Design: Trials were identified by Medline (PubMed), ISI Web of Science (Science Citation Index Expanded), Embase, Cochrane library, and reference lists of published studies, review articles, editorials, and by hand-searched reports from major cancer meeting reports.Results: Six randomized trials including 1,155 patients were identified, of whom 483 (41.8%) were hormone receptor–negative, 672 (58.2%) hormone receptor–positive, 534 (46.2%) received taxanes alone, and 621 (53.8%) anthracyclines plus taxanes or the docetaxel–carboplatin regimen. Overall, the dual block was associated with a significant 13% absolute improvement in pCR rate compared with single-agent trastuzumab (summary risk difference, SRD 0.13; 95% CI, 0.08–0.19). The activity was greater in hormone receptor–negative patients who received chemotherapy with taxanes alone (SRD 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13–0.37), compared to hormone receptor–positive or hormone receptor–negative disease treated with anthracyclines plus taxanes or the docetaxel–carboplatin regimen (SRD 0.09; 95% CI, 0.02–0.15; Pinteraction = 0.05).Conclusions: On the basis of ΔpCR data, the dual block with trastuzumab and lapatinib plus chemotherapy is a very active treatment only in HER2+ and hormone receptor–negative breast cancer treated with taxane monochemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res; 22(18); 4594–603. ©2016 AACR.

ImportanceSuccessful therapeutic cancer prevention requires definition of the minimal effective dose. Aromatase inhibitors decrease breast cancer incidence in high-risk women, but use in prevention and compliance in adjuvant settings are hampered by adverse events.ObjectiveTo compare the noninferiority percentage change of estradiol in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer given exemestane, 25 mg, 3 times weekly or once weekly vs a standard daily dose with a noninferiority margin of −6%.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis multicenter, presurgical, double-blind phase 2b randomized clinical trial evaluated 2 alternative dosing schedules of exemestane. Postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer who were candidates for breast surgery were screened from February 1, 2017, to August 31, 2019. Blood samples were collected at baseline and final visit; tissue biomarker changes were assessed from diagnostic biopsy and surgical specimen. Biomarkers were measured in different laboratories between April 2020 and December 2021.InterventionsExemestane, 25 mg, once daily, 3 times weekly, or once weekly for 4 to 6 weeks before surgery.Main Outcomes and MeasuresSerum estradiol concentrations were measured by solid-phase extraction followed by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry detection. Toxic effects were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute terminology criteria, and Ki-67 was assessed by immunohistochemistry.ResultsA total of 180 women were randomized into 1 of the 3 arms; median (IQR) age was 66 (60-71) years, 63 (60-69) years, and 65 (61-70) years in the once-daily, 3-times-weekly, and once-weekly arms, respectively. In the intention-to-treat population (n = 171), the least square mean percentage change of serum estradiol was −89%, −85%, and −60% for exemestane once daily (n = 55), 3 times weekly (n = 56), and once weekly (n = 60), respectively. The difference in estradiol percentage change between the once-daily and 3-times-weekly arms was −3.6% (P for noninferiority = .37), whereas in compliant participants (n = 153), it was 2.0% (97.5% lower confidence limit, −5.6%; P for noninferiority = .02). Among secondary end points, Ki-67 and progesterone receptor were reduced in all arms, with median absolute percentage changes of −7.5%, −5.0%, and −4.0% for Ki-67 in the once-daily, 3-times-weekly, and once-weekly arms, respectively (once daily vs 3 times weekly, P = .31; once daily vs once weekly, P = .06), and −17.0%, −9.0%, and −7.0% for progesterone receptor, respectively. Sex hormone–binding globulin and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol had a better profile among participants in the 3-times-weekly arm compared with once-daily arm. Adverse events were similar in all arms.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this randomized clinical trial, exemestane, 25 mg, given 3 times weekly in compliant patients was noninferior to the once-daily dosage in decreasing serum estradiol. This new schedule should be further studied in prevention studies and in women who do not tolerate the daily dose in the adjuvant setting.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02598557; EudraCT: 2015-005063-16

Background: The aromatase inhibitor exemestane (EXE) has shown to lower cancer incidence in high-risk postmenopausal women. However, undesirable symptoms and side effects (i.e., bone density loss, musculoskeletal ache, climacteric syndrome) may compromise patient motivation and adherence to a long-term preventive treatment. A less frequent drug schedule, compared to the standard regimen, may be more acceptable to healthy at-risk women. We hypothesized that comparison of two alternative less frequent dose regimens with the standard daily dose regimen will show that it is possible to decrease undesirable symptoms of EXE while still effectively reducing serum estradiol. Trial Design: We are conducting a multi-center, pre-surgical, double-blind, non-inferiority phase IIb study in which 180 postmenopausal women will be randomized to receive either EXE 25 mg/day or 25 mg/three times a week or 25 mg/week for 4 to 6 weeks prior to surgery. Surgery will occur on day 29, 36 or 43 after treatment initiation. Eligible subjects are postmenopausal women with histologically-confirmed ER-positive (ER >10%) primary breast cancer candidates for surgery. Participants with T0-2, N0-1, Mx or with larger tumors who refuse neo-adjuvant therapy before surgery are eligible. Subjects are stratified according to participating site and body mass index (25 kg/m2). The primary objective is to assess if the reduction in estradiol with EXE 25 mg/three times a week and EXE 25 mg/week is comparable with the standard dose of 25 mg/day of EXE. Methods: Blood will be collected at baseline and at the end of treatment. Tissue samples will be collected from the diagnostic biopsy and at the time of surgery. The primary endpoint is the percentage change of serum estradiol concentration between baseline and surgery in the three arms in a CLIA certified laboratory. Given the expected reduction of at least 80% change with EXE at 25 mg daily considered as reference group (control arm) against 25 mg/three times a week or 25 mg weekly, for the power calculation we assume a non-inferiority difference of 6% in percentage changes of circulating estradiol after treatment from baseline, using a one-sided, two-sample t-test. Secondary outcome measures are the incidence of toxicity and menopausal symptoms according to the CTCAE (v4) and by the self-administered MENQoL; the effect of the three regimens on sex hormones (estrone, estrone sulphate, SHBG, testosterone, DHEAS and FSH) and the effect on circulating estradiol levels using an ultrasensitive method given that the serum levels in postmenopausal women under EXE may be very low. Drug and metabolites levels will be measured in blood, cancer tissue and non-cancer tissue. Evaluation of serum insulin, glucose (homeostatic model assessment index), and lipid profile (total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglycerides), leptin and adiponectin will be performed before and after treatment. Additionally, we will measure breast estradiol concentration in cancer and non-cancer tissue and compare changes in ER, PgR, and proliferation in cancer and non-cancer tissue samples obtained at time of biopsy and definitive surgery. Finally, we will also analyze the role of the polymorphic UGT2B17 gene (involved in EXE and 17-dihydroexemestane metabolism) as well as tissue proteomics. Preliminary results: Enrollment started in February 2017 and as of July 3, 2019, a total of 170/180 participants have been randomized (94% of the expected sample size). Preliminary data will be presented at the conference. IND Sponsor: NCI/DCP NCI contract: HHSN26120120034I Citation Format: Aliana Guerrieri-Gonzaga, Parjhitham Thomas, Andrea DeCensi, Katherine D Crew, Nagi Kumar, Sara Gandini, Lana Vornik, Brandy Heckman-Stoddard, Eva Szabo, Eileen Dimond, Jack Lee, Diane Liu, Matteo Lazzeroni, Sara Cagnacci, Davide Serrano, Mauro D'Amico, Flavio Guasone, Tania Buttiron Webber, Powel Brown, Bernardo Bonanni. Alternative dosing of exemestane before surgery in postmenopausal patients with stage 0-II estrogen receptor positive breast cancer: Design and methodology [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-04-03.

Background We recently conducted a de-escalation trial of low-dose tamoxifen 5 mg/day ("babytam", BT) or placebo given for 3 years in 500 women with noninvasive breast cancer. Women on babytam had a 52% reduction of recurrence (invasive breast cancer or DCIS) after 5 years. Since menopausal symptoms are major reasons for treatment withdrawal during tamoxifen preventive therapy, we compared and analyzed the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with the physician-reported adverse events and studied their association with recurrence. Methods Menopausal symptoms recorded by physicians using the Common Terminology Criteria (CTCAEs) were compared with a patient self-reported validated questionnaire reviewed by a research nurse at baseline and every 6 months up to 36 months. Hot flashes (HF), the main outcome measure, were detected through a self-report 7-day diary for frequency and intensity. Treatment adherence and efficacy were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier curves and the Cox model. Results The number of HF events at 12, 24, and 36 months for PROs versus CTCAEs was 246 versus 12, 238 versus 8, and 210 versus 4, respectively. The majority of events were grade 1. There was no difference in PROs between babytam and placebo except for HF daily frequency, which increased by 1.5 events (95% CI, 1.1-1.8) on placebo to 2.1 on babytam (95% CI, 1.7-2.5, p = 0.05). The presence of HF at baseline was a favorable prognostic factor for recurrence and a predictive factor for response to babytam. Adherence was similar between babytam and placebo. Conclusions The use of PROs is effective for identifying frequent mild grade menopausal symptoms which are underestimated by physicians but important prognostic and predictive factors. Research nurse can use these results as a tool to reassure patients about symptoms, improve adherence to treatment, and limit dropouts.

Purpose Initial findings in patients with cancer suggest a lower seroconversion to SARS-COV-2 vaccination possibly related to myelo-immunosuppressive therapies. We conducted a prospective study to assess factors predicting poor seroconversion and adverse events following immunization (AEFI) to the BNT162b2 vaccine in patients on active treatment. Patients and methods Cancer patients candidate to two doses of BNT162b2 SARS-COV-2 vaccination were enrolled. Patients on active surveillance served as controls. The primary endpoint was poor seroconversion (anti S1/S2 IgG

Cancer patients are exposed to a greater risk of COVID-19 infection, resulting in treatment delays and unnecessary hospitalizations. International authorities have suggested reducing visits to hospitals and guarantee continuity of care. We developed a home care project called Home Se-Cure (HSC) to guarantee the continuity of oral, intramuscular, and subcutaneous cancer therapy during COVID-19. The Home Se-Cure project included cancer patients living near Galliera Hospital. Patients received home visits by registered nurses (RNs), whoperformed blood tests and delivered cancer therapies. Patients were instructed to take drugs after blood test results and therapy confirmation by oncologists. Sixty-six patients decided to participate and 38 declined the service. A customer satisfaction questionnaire was administered to a subgroup of patients participating in the project. The most prevalent disease in the HSC group was prostate cancer. The mean age of the patients in HSC was 78.4 years and 68.9 in the decliner group. The majority of the HSC participants appreciated the project because they could stay at home (71%) and reduce the risk of COVID-19 contagion (67.7%). Compared to decliners, the time the study group saved was 2033 hours. HSC guaranteed the continuity of care during the COVID-19 pandemic by reducing the number of patients in the hospital and avoiding crowds in the waiting room.

519 Background: Successful therapeutic cancer prevention requires definition of the minimal effective dose of the proposed agent. Aromatase inhibitors substantially decreased breast cancer incidence in high risk postmenopausal women in phase III trials but their clinical use in prevention and adherence in adjuvant setting is limited by adverse events. We conducted a randomized presurgical phase IIb trial to evaluate two alternative doses of exemestane. Methods: We conducted a multi-center, pre-surgical, double-blind, 3-arm, non-inferiority phase IIb study in postmenopausal women with histologically confirmed estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Patients were randomized to receive either exemestane 25 mg/day (QD), or 25 mg/three times/week (TIW), or 25 mg once a week (QW) for 4-6 weeks before surgery. Blood and tissue biomarkers were collected at baseline and final visit. The primary aim was a non-inferiority percent change of circulating estradiol relative to the standard dose. Secondary endpoints were the change in Ki-67 and PgR expression in cancer tissue, blood sex hormones, lipid profile, toxicity and menopausal symptoms. For the power calculation we assumed a non-inferiority difference of 6% in the percentage change of estradiol among arms, using a one-sided, two-sample t-test. Assuming a 10% drop-out rate, a total sample size of 180 participants (60 per arm) had 80% power to detect a 6% margin of equivalence. The significance level for the main endpoint was 0.025 to account for multiple comparisons and 0.05 for secondary endpoints. Results: A total of 230 women were screened, 180 agreed to participate and 173 were evaluable for response. The median percent change of estradiol was -98%, -98%, and -70% for exemestane QD (n = 56), TIW (n = 57), and QW (n = 60), respectively, showing no significant difference between QD and TIW arms (p = 0.9). Similarly, no differences were observed for estrone, total estrone and estrone sulfate between QD and TIW arms. The QW arm showed some modulation in all hormones, even though less significantly so. Among the secondary endpoints, Ki-67 and PgR were reduced in all arms, with a median change of -5% vs -7.5% for Ki-67(p = 0.124), and -9 vs -17 for PgR (p = 0.246) in the TIW vs QD arms, respectively. SHBG and HDL-cholesterol had a more favorable profile with the TIW dose compared to the daily dose. Adverse events, measured according to the CTCAE (v4), and menopausal symptoms according to MENQOL were similar in all arms, but the short treatment time may not be representative. Conclusions: Exemestane 25 mg TIW retains a comparable activity than 25 mg QD. This activity was similar in both arms throughout the primary and the main secondary endpoints. This new schedule should be further assessed in prevention studies and in women on adjuvant treatment who do not tolerate the daily dose. Clinical trial information: NCT02598557.

Low-dose tamoxifen halves recurrence in non-invasive breast cancer without significant adverse events. Some adjuvant trials with tamoxifen 20 mg/day had shown an association between low endoxifen levels (9–16 nM) and recurrence, but no association with CYP2D6 was shown in the NSABP P1 and P2 prevention trials. We studied the association of CYP2D6 genotype and tamoxifen metabolites with tumor biomarkers and recurrence in a randomized phase III trial of low-dose tamoxifen. Median (IQR) endoxifen levels at year 1 were 8.4 (5.3–11.4) in patients who recurred vs 7.5 (5.1–10.2) in those who did not recur (p = 0.60). Tamoxifen and metabolites significantly decreased C-reactive protein (CRP, p P = 0.03). In conclusion, endoxifen is below 9 nM in most subjects treated with 5 mg/day despite strong efficacy and there is no association with recurrence, suggesting that the reason for tamoxifen failure is not poor drug metabolism. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT01357772.

Background: mRNA-based vaccines have shown 95% protection from SARS-COV-2 disease in healthy populations. Initial findings in cancer patients suggest a lower seroconversion and greater toxicity possibly related to myelo-immunosuppressive therapies. Methods: We conducted a prospective study to assess factors predicting poor seroconversion and adverse events following immunization (AEFI) to the BNT162b2 vaccine in cancer patients on active treatment. The primary endpoint was poor seroconversion (IgG 6 months on active surveillance served as controls. Multivariable logistic model and mixed effect models for repeated measures investigated independent factors associated with poor seroconversion and AEFI, adjusting for confounders. Findings: Between March 15 and July 21, 2021, 320 subjects were recruited and 291 were assessable for IgG response. The lack of seroconversion at 42 days was 1.6% (95% CI, 0.4-8.7) on active surveillance, 13.9% (8.2-21.6) on chemotherapy, 11.4% (5.1-21.3) on hormone therapy, 21.7% (7.5-43.7) on biological therapy and 4.8% (0.12-23.8) on immunotherapy. Compared to controls, risk of no IgG response was greater for chemotherapy (P=0.023), biological therapy (0.009) and hormonotherapy (P=0.052). Older age and advanced stage also predicted poor seroconversion. Overall, 43 patients (14.8%) complained of AEFI, mostly of mild grade. Risk of AEFI was greater in females (P=0.001) and younger patients (P=0.009). There was a trend to a D-dimer increase in IgG responders (p=0.01). Interpretation: Except for immunotherapy, chemotherapy, biological therapy and hormone therapy as well as increasing age and advanced stage predict poor seroconversion after two doses of BNT162b2 in up to 20% of patients, indicating the need for a booster dose and long-term serological testing in vaccine non-responders. AEFI occur much more frequently in women and younger subjects who may benefit from preventive medications. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04932863 Funding: Ospedali Galliera, Associazione WeCare, Lions-Club Genova Sant’Agata. Italian Health Ministry, Ricerca Corrente and 5×1,000 (IEO). Declaration of Interest: None to declare. Ethical Approval: This study was approved by the Lazzaro Spallanzani National Institute for Infectious Diseases, Rome, Italy, and the local Ethical Committee.

The challenge of effective management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and other pre-malignant disorders of the breast is to select patients who will not progress to invasive carcinoma from those at the highest risk who require radiotherapy and/or endocrine therapy to minimize the risk of a subsequent invasive recurrence. Although IBIS-II and NSABP-B35 DCIS phase III trials proved that tamoxifen 20 mg/day and anastrozole reduce the risk of ipsilateral and contralateral events, the toxicities of both drugs have hampered the drug uptake by high-risk women. We recently reported results of a 3-year placebo-controlled trial of low-dose (5 mg/d) tamoxifen in 500 women with intraepithelial neoplasia (70% DCIS). At a median follow-up of 5 years, women randomly assigned to low-dose tamoxifen had half the number of subsequent diagnoses of DCIS or invasive cancer compared with those randomly assigned to placebo but no increase in thromboembolic events or endometrial cancers. The 5-year number needed to treat was 22 (95% CI, 20-27). Our attention is now focused on prognostic and predictive markers to identify patients who can derive the greatest benefits from low dose tamoxifen, such as for instance the expression of 23 genes involved in cell cycle progression (CCP). In conclusion, we endorse an active treatment of DCIS as the standard of care.

Author(s): Guerrieri-Gonzaga, Aliana; Serrano, Davide; Thomas, Parjhitham; Crew, Katherine D; Kumar, Nagi B; Gandini, Sara; Vornik, Lana A; Lee, Jack; Cagnacci, Sara; Vicini, Elisa; Accornero, Chiara A; D'Amico, Mauro; Guasone, Flavio; Spinaci, Stefano; Webber, Tania B; Brown, Powel H; Szabo, Eva; Heckman-Stoddard, Brandy; Bonanni, Bernardo | Abstract: IntroductionAromatase inhibitors are effective in lowering breast cancer incidence among postmenopausal women, but adverse events represent a barrier to their acceptability and adherence as a preventive treatment. This study aims to assess whether lowering exemestane schedule may retain biological activity while improving tolerability in breast cancer patients.Methods/designWe are conducting a, pre-surgical, non-inferiority phase IIb study in postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Participants are randomized to receive either exemestane 25nmg/day or 25nmg/three times-week or once a week for 4 to 6nweeks prior to surgery. The primary endpoint is the percentage change of serum estradiol concentration between baseline and surgery comparing the three arms. Sample size of 180 women was calculated assuming a 6% non-inferiority of the percent change of estradiol in the lower dose arms compared with the 80% decrease predicted in the full dose arm, with 80% power and using a one-sided 5% significance level and a two-sample t-test. Main secondary outcomes are: safety; change in Ki-67 in cancer and adjacent pre-cancer tissue, circulating sex hormones, adipokines, lipid profile, insulin and glucose changes, in correlation with drug and metabolites concentrations.Results and discussionThe present paper is focused on methodology and operational aspects of the study. A total of 180 participants have ben enrolled. The trial is still blinded, and the analyses are ongoing. Despite the short term duration, results may have relevant implications for clinical management of women at increased risk of developing a ER positive breast cancer.

1553 Background: Low dose tamoxifen (T, 5 mg/d) given for 3 years halved recurrence in 500 women with non-invasive disease (DeCensi et al. JCO 2019). Retrospective studies with 20 mg/d have shown an association between low levels of endoxifen (9-16 nM) or Z-4OHtam (3.26 nM) and recurrence, but recent prospective studies have not confirmed these findings. We measured CYP2D6 genotype and 8 metabolite levels to determine their associations with adverse events, tumor biomarkers (IGF-I, SHBG, C-reactive protein, CRP) and breast cancer recurrence. Methods: CYP2D6 genotyping was performed in the T arm (n = 183) as previously described (Johansson H et al. BCRT 2016). T and metabolites were measured at 1 (n = 169) and 3 y (n = 152) as previously described (Helland T et al. BCR 2017). We tested linear relationships between metabolite levels and biomarkers, adjusting for age, BMI, treatment compliance and baseline biomarker levels. Cumulative incidence of recurrence according to endoxifen levels was calculated by the Cox model. Results: Endoxifen concentrations were associated to CYP2D6 metabolizer status (p < 0.001). Median (IQR) endoxifen levels were 8.4 (5.2-11.3) and 8.8 (5.8-11.5) at 1 and 3 y, with only 42% and 47% of subjects reaching 9 nM. Median endoxifen levels were related to pill count (5.5, 7.1 and 9.0 nM/L for medication possession rate < 83.3%, 83.4-99.9%, 100%, respectively). There was no difference in metabolite levels and menopausal symptoms. There was an inverse relationship between endoxifen and endometrial thickness at 3 y (p = 0.04), and between endoxifen or tamoxifen levels and IGF-I levels at 3 y (p = 0.001). T levels were positively associated with SHBG levels in postmenopausal women (p-interaction = 0.04). Endoxifen, T and 4OHtam decreased CRP, with a greater effect in premenopausal women (p-interaction = 0.02). An increase in CRP after 3 years was associated with a HR of 4.37 (95% CI, 1.14-16.73, P = 0.03) of recurrence compared to women with no increase of CRP. Median (IQR) endoxifen levels at year 1 were 8.4 (5.3-11.4) in patients who recurred vs 7.5 (5.1-10.2) in those who did not recur (p = 0.6), although this comparison was underpowered. Conclusions: T levels themselves may contribute to clinical activity by decreasing IGF-I and increasing SHBG. Elevated CRP is a predictive factor for recurrence which is down-regulated by T and metabolites. Endoxifen is below 9 nM in the majority of subjects treated with 5 mg/day, although this threshold was obtained in studies up to 20 years. Clinical trial information: NCT01357772.

Supporting high school students in choosing the degree programme that better suits their aspirations and preferences could play a key role in Universities and Colleges strategies, since it could be a crucial element in limiting the students' drop-out phenomenon. With the aim of welcoming freshmen belonging to the digital native generation, we have defined a two-level design framework, by exploiting user-driven innovation and open innovation approaches in a co-design experience. This paper describes such an experience we have conducted by exploring HCI and ICT to design a mobile application that can drive students in choosing the programme that suits their skills and interests, deploying it in the rich scenario of the University of Bologna (Alma Mater Studiorum). The experiment involved 200 high school students and 59 university students in a co-design and open innovation action, resulting in a mobile app.

The nasal cavity is a vulnerable zone which may be damaged by vascular disorders. We systematically assessed the frequency and severity of nasal cavity alterations during bevacizumab treatment, to determine its clinical relevance and factors contributing to its onset.We conducted a hospital-based cohort study in 47 consecutive patients with advanced cancers who were on treatment with chemotherapy and bevacizumab at different doses. All patients underwent otolaryngology (ENT) examination at the time of study initiation.The mean number of cycles at first ENT examination was 16 (standard deviation = 14). A total of 45 patients (96%) showed nose mucosal lesions, of whom 30% had erosions and 62% had grade 1 - 2 epistaxis. One patient had septal perforation. Grades 1 - 4 sinus disorders were noted in 60%. There was a significant trend to a higher risk of grade ≥ 2 nasal events for bevacizumab doses7.5 mg/kg, concomitant taxane use and digital nasal self-manipulation.We found a high incidence of nasal cavity lesions in patients receiving bevacizumab, with evidence for a dose-related effect. Most cases were low grade and manageable without drug interruption, but severe toxicity may rarely occur. Oncologists should be aware of this unusual event.

BACKGROUND: Abiraterone acetate is an effective drug for castration-resistant prostate cancer, but cardiac serious adverse events (SAEs) may occur. We studied their association with N-terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and troponin T (TnT) during abiraterone therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a single institution, 17 patients were treated with abiraterone acetate 1 g daily with concomitant prednisone and then switched to dexametasone plus canrenone. Blood samples for PSA, NT-proBNP, and TnT were obtained at baseline and after 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: Five patients (29.4%) experienced G3 to 4 cardiac SAEs after a median of 13 weeks (range, 9-32), including pulmonary edema, heart failure, acute coronary syndrome, sinus bradycardia with syncope, and pulmonary edema. At baseline, 4 weeks, and 3 months, median NT-proBNP and TnT levels were higher in patients with subsequent cardiac SAEs (P= .03 and P= .04 for NT-proBNP and TnT at 3 months, respectively). After switching to dexametasone and introducing canrenone, no additional cardiac SAEs were noted. Overall response rate was 67%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests a higher than expected risk of cardiac SAEs during abiraterone treatment which may well be due to the small sample size and the unrestricted entry criteria. However, baseline and frequent NT-proBNP and TnT monitoring predicted a higher risk for cardiac SAE. Larger studies should confirm our findings.

Metastatic breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and hence it is desirable to have a variety of treatment options to meet different treatment aims in individual patients. Anthracyclines are extremely effective single agents in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, and combination therapy with anthracycline-containing regimens significantly improves response rates and progression-free survival, compared with non-anthracycline regimens. The addition of taxanes further increases the efficacy of anthracyclines as first-line therapy. Combination therapy with trastuzumab, taxanes and anthracyclines has been shown to produce significant improvements in survival, compared with taxanes and anthracyclines alone; however, trastuzumab is associated with significant cardiotoxicity, and augments the cardiotoxicity associated with anthracycline-based regimens. New anthracycline formulations such as non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD) have an important role in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. NPLD is as effective as conventional doxorubicin formulations, and can be combined with trastuzumab with acceptable toxicity. However, a number of questions remain as to how anthracycline therapy can be optimised. Ultimately, the choice of regimen will require a balance between efficacy and the impact of treatment on the patient's quality of life.

Background: With the increasing practice of hormonal infertility treatments in infertile women, both for ovulation induction in anovulatory women and for ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted reproductive technologies, concerns have been raised about the long-term effects of such practice on the subsequent risk of breast cancer. Sterility itself is an independent risk factor, though its effect is not yet clear. In the past years, a number of population-based studies has investigated the possible association between breast cancer incidence and infertility treatments, with inconsistent results. With these premises, we performed a pooled analysis of the association between infertility treatments by any kind of hormonal manipulation and breast cancer incidence, based on published data. Methods: Population cohort studies, evaluating the association between BC incidence and hormonal infertility treatments were identified by MEDLINE search. Standardised Incidence Ratios (SIRs) were pooled across the studies by inverse variance weighting. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the following covariates: lenght of follow up (< 10 yrs vs ≥10 yrs), type of hormonal therapy (clomiphene vs gonadotropins) and type of control group (population based on internal control, ie infertile women). All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Thirteen eligible cohort studies, including 364.342 women were identified and retrieved. Data on breast cancer incidence and type of fertility treatments were available for all studies. Overall hormonal infertility treatments were associated with a 15% increase in the incidence of breast cancer as compared with untreated women (SIR 1.15, CI 1.09-1.21; p < 0.0001). Breast cancer risk was significantly higher in clomiphene treated women (SIR 1.21; 95%CI 1.10-1.32) than in gonadotropins users (SIR 1.04; 95%CI 0.91-1.20, p for interaction < 0.05). The increase in breast cancer incidence seems to be dependent on the length of follow up (SIR 1.05; 95%CI 0.96-1.14 for Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-09-01.

Purpose: (Neo)adjuvant treatment with chemotherapy plus trastuzumab reduces recurrence and death risk in HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. Randomized trials assessed HER2 dual block by adding lapatinib to trastuzumab and chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting using pathologic complete response (pCR) as the outcome measure. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials testing neoadjuvant dual block with lapatinib and trastuzumab versus trastuzumab alone in HER2+ breast cancer. Experimental Design: Trials were identified by Medline (PubMed), ISI Web of Science (Science Citation Index Expanded), Embase, Cochrane library, and reference lists of published studies, review articles, editorials, and by hand-searched reports from major cancer meeting reports. Results: Six randomized trials including 1,155 patients were identified, of whom 483 (41.8%) were hormone receptor–negative, 672 (58.2%) hormone receptor–positive, 534 (46.2%) received taxanes alone, and 621 (53.8%) anthracyclines plus taxanes or the docetaxel–carboplatin regimen. Overall, the dual block was associated with a significant 13% absolute improvement in pCR rate compared with single-agent trastuzumab (summary risk difference, SRD 0.13; 95% CI, 0.08–0.19). The activity was greater in hormone receptor–negative patients who received chemotherapy with taxanes alone (SRD 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13–0.37), compared to hormone receptor–positive or hormone receptor–negative disease treated with anthracyclines plus taxanes or the docetaxel–carboplatin regimen (SRD 0.09; 95% CI, 0.02–0.15; Pinteraction = 0.05). Conclusions: On the basis of ΔpCR data, the dual block with trastuzumab and lapatinib plus chemotherapy is a very active treatment only in HER2+ and hormone receptor–negative breast cancer treated with taxane monochemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res; 22(18); 4594–603. ©2016 AACR.

BACKGROUND: In the TRIBE study, FOLFOXIRI (fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) plus bevacizumab significantly improved progression-free survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer compared with FOLFIRI (fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan) plus bevacizumab. In this updated analysis, we aimed to provide mature results for overall survival-a secondary endpoint-and report treatment efficacy in RAS and BRAF molecular subgroups. METHODS: TRIBE was an open-label, multicentre, phase 3 randomised study of patients (aged 18-70 years with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status of 2 or less and aged 71-75 years with an ECOG performance status of 0) with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer who were recruited from 34 Italian oncology units. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a web-based procedure to receive FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab or FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab. Bevacizumab was given as a 5 mg/kg intravenous dose. FOLFIRI consisted of a 180 mg/m2 intravenous infusion of irinotecan for 60 min followed by a 200 mg/m2 intravenous infusion of leucovorin for 120 min, a 400 mg/m2 intravenous bolus of fluorouracil, and a 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion of fluorouracil for 46 h. FOLFOXIRI consisted of a 165 mg/m2 intravenous infusion of irinotecan for 60 min, followed by an 85 mg/m2 intravenous infusion of oxaliplatin given concurrently with 200 mg/m2 leucovorin for 120 min, followed by a 3200 mg/m2 continuous infusion of fluorouracil for 48 h. Tissue samples for RAS and BRAF mutational status analyses were centrally collected. In this updated analysis, we assessed the secondary endpoint of overall survival in the main cohort and treatment efficacy in RAS and BRAF molecular subgroups. All analyses were by intention to treat. TRIBE was concluded on Nov 30, 2014. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00719797. FINDINGS: Between July 17, 2008, and May 31, 2011, 508 patients were randomly assigned. At a median follow-up of 48·1 months (IQR 41·7-55·6), median overall survival was 29·8 months (95% CI 26·0-34·3) in the FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab group compared with 25·8 months (22·5-29·1) in the FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·80, 95% CI 0·65-0·98; p=0·03). Median overall survival was 37·1 months (95% CI 29·7-42·7) in the RAS and BRAF wild-type subgroup compared with 25·6 months (22·4-28·6) in the RAS-mutation-positive subgroup (HR 1·49, 95% CI 1·11-1·99) and 13·4 months (8·2-24·1) in the BRAF-mutation-positive subgroup (HR 2·79, 95% CI 1·75-4·46; likelihood-ratio test p

In this paper we discuss the problem of recovering a density from its moments. For theoretical reasons, we propose the use of fractional moments combined with the Maximum Entropy density. We then discuss the application to the pricing of exotic options.

Background The addition of bevacizumab to standard chemotherapy prolongs progression free survival in the first line treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), but its cost/effectiveness is debated. We assessed the safety and activity of a lower dose of bevacizumab in pretreated advanced stage EOC. Methods We treated 15 patients, mostly with platinum resistant EOC, who had received a median of four prior cytotoxic regimens, with bevacizumab 5–7.5 mg/kg q21 days in combination with either carboplatin (n = 8), oral cyclofosfamide (n = 5) or weekly paclitaxel (n = 2). Bevacizumab was administered until disease progression. Tumor response was assessed by CA125 and fusion 18 F-FDG PET/contrast enhanced CT. Results The median number of bevacizumab cycles was 21 (range 3–59). The median baseline CA125 was 272 U/ml and decreased to 15.2 U/ml at nadir. Tumor response was 4 complete response (CR) (26.7%) and 7 partial response (PR) (46.7%) by chemotherapy (CT), with an overall response rate of 73.4% (95% CI, 51.0 – 95.8) according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST), and 6 CR (40%) and 4 PR (26.7%) by PET, for an overall metabolic response rate of 67% (95%CI, 42.8 – 90.6) according to PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 21 months and median overall survival (OS) was 24 months. Grade 3 adverse events related to bevacizumab were hypertension (n = 2), proteinuria (n = 1) and epistaxis (n = 5). Treatment was delayed in five patients for nasal bleeding or uncontrolled hypertension. Conclusions Low-dose bevacizumab and chemotherapy was well tolerated and active in a heavily pretreated population of advanced EOC. Further studies should assess the activity of low dose bevacizumab in EOC.

3532 Background: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) caused by fluoropyrimidines depend, at least in part, from DPD deficiency resulting from the loss-of-function mutations c.1905+1G > A and c.2846A > T....

The annotation efforts of the BIOSAPIENS European Network of Excellence have generated several distributed annotation systems (DAS) with the aim of integrating Bioinformatics resources and annotating metazoan genomes (http://www.biosapiens.info). In this context, the PONGO DAS server (http://pongo.biocomp.unibo.it) provides the annotation on predictive basis for the all-alpha membrane proteins in the human genome, not only through DAS queries, but also directly using a simple web interface. In order to produce a more comprehensive analysis of the sequence at hand, this annotation is carried out with four selected and high scoring predictors: TMHMM2.0, MEMSAT, PRODIV and ENSEMBLE1.0. The stored and pre-computed predictions for the human proteins can be searched and displayed in a graphical view. However the web service allows the prediction of the topology of any kind of putative membrane proteins, regardless of the organism and more importantly with the same sequence profile for a given sequence when required. Here we present a new web server that incorporates the state-of-the-art topology predictors in a single framework, so that putative users can interactively compare and evaluate four predictions simultaneously for a given sequence. Together with the predicted topology, the server also displays a signal peptide prediction determined with SPEP. The PONGO web server is available at http://pongo.biocomp.unibo.it/pongo.

Aim: Achieving an initial relevant and rapid tumor shrinkage may be an important objective in mCRC pts. The triplet FOLFOXIRI is a highly active regimen. The aim of the present analysis is to explore the impact of FOLFOXIRI plus BV or anti-EGFRs in determining tumor response in RAS and BRAF wt pts treated in clinical trials by the GONO group. Methods: 37 and 64 RAS and BRAF wt pts treated with FOLFOXIRI plus panitumumab and FOLFOXIRI plus cetuximab in TRIP and MACBETH trial respectively and evaluable for response were included in the anti-EGFR group (N = 101); 62 RAS and BRAF wt pts treated with FOLFOXIRI plus BV in the TRIBE trial and evaluable for response were included in the BV group. Best response according to RECIST, early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and deepness of response (DoR) in the two groups were analysed. Pts achieving a >20% reduction in the sum of longest diameters of RECIST target lesions at week 8 compared to baseline were defined as early responders. Since pts in TRIBE and TRIP trials received up to 12 cycles of treatment, while pts in MACBETH trial received up to 8 cycles, DoR was defined as the relative change in the sum of longest diameters of RECIST target lesions at the nadir within the first 8 cycles of treatment, compared to baseline. Results: 83 pts (82%) in the anti-EGFR group and 44 pts (71%) in the BV group achieved a RECIST response (p = 0.120). Early response was reported in 70 out of 95 evaluable pts (74%) and in 36 out of 58 evaluable pts (62%) in the anti-EGFR and in the BV group, respectively (p = 0.150). The median ETS in the anti-EGFR group was significantly higher than in the BV group (40.8% vs 26.4%, p = 0.003). A significantly better DoR was achieved in the anti-EGFR group as compared to the BV group (median DoR: 48.6% vs 37.8%, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Both FOLFOXIRI plus BV and FOLFOXIRI plus an anti-EGFR allow to achieve impressive results in terms of RECIST response rate (71% and 82% respectively) in the first-line treatment of RAS and BRAF wt mCRC pts. According to the present exploratory analysis the use of anti-EGFRs may be associated with an higher extent of ETS and a better DoR. Disclosure: A. Falcone: Consultant, honoraria and research funding: Roche, Merck, Amgen Consultant and honoraria: Sanofi Aventis, Bayer, Celgene. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

3519 Background: Phase III TRIBE trial demonstrated that first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bev improved PFS and RECIST response and, at adjusted analyses, OS as compared to FOLFIRI plus bev. The prognostic...

521 Background: The TRIBE trial demonstrated that first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) improves PFS, response rate (RECIST), and OS in comparison to FOLFIRI plus bev (ASCO Annual Meeting 2013). Recent experiences evidenced that both ETS and DoR may implement the assessment of response and correlate with survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: ETS was defined as the relative change in the sum of longest diameters of RECIST target lesions at week 8 compared to baseline. A 20% decrease was adopted as cut-off value to discriminate early responders and non-responders. DoR was defined as the relative change in the sum of longest diameters of RECIST target lesions at the nadir in the absence of new lesions or progression of non-target lesions compared to baseline. The median value was used as cut-off. Results: Out of 508 randomized patients, 443 and 484 patients were evaluable for ETS and DoR, respectively. Early responders achieved longer PFS (median PFS: 12.7 vs 10.0 mos, HR: 0.66 [0.52-0.79], p

18610 Background: Pain is probably under-recognized and under-treated in the Elderly with advanced cancer disease but the effect of a therapy with high potency opioids is not studied so much in geriatric age people. To evaluate efficacy and tollerability of escalating doses of Transdermal Fentanyl (TTS-F) or equipollent doses of oral morphine long acting with Immediate Release Oral Morphine (IROM) as rescue medication for treatment of moderate-severe cancer pain, we have started a Multicentric Observational Analysis in four cancer centres of north-western Italy. Studies of oncological palliation using valid measures of quality of life show that patients may be willing to accept some side effects of treatment as long as they gain relief from tumor-related symptoms Methods: -TIQ (Therapy Impact Questionnaire) -VAS (Visual Analogic Scale): 0 to 10 -Toxicity (WHO criteria) -Geriatric Assessment for pts aged >70 yrs (only at time 0): CIRS (Comorbility Index) IADL/ADL (Instrumental Activities Daily Living/Activities Daily Living). Patients characteristics -159 pts -Total Median Age: 66 yrs (range 38–86) -Median ECOG PS: 1 (range 0–2) -Elderly (>70 yrs): 75. Pain Starting situation -Median starting VAS: 5.5 (range 3–9) -TIQ: depression 70 pts, cachexia 55 pts, dispnoea 40 pts -CIRS (Comorbidity index): comorbidity were present among 66 pts. TTS-Fentanyl starting dose: 25 mcg/h every 72 h (range 25–50 mcg) or oral morphine long acting 60–90 mg plus IROM 10 mg every 4–6 hours for breakthrough pain present in 38 pts Results: -Quickly pain VAS downloading during first two weeks of treatment (median VAS 1) -Analgesic doses were not significantly increased after two months and not exceeded WHO grade 2 -IROM rescue was similar to that observed for the overall population -TIQ, ADL and IADL were not influenced by therapy. Conclusions: High potency opioids (TTS-F or long acting morphine equipollent doses, plus Rescue-IROM) offers durable long term maintenance pain relief wild acceptable toxicity also in elderly people, is particularly useful for cancer pts with compliance problems and may be considered as first-line treatment for moderate/severe cancer pain. No significant financial relationships to disclose.