PURPOSE Clinician job dissatisfaction and attrition are associated with increased healthcare costs, decreased patient satisfaction, reduced access to healthcare, and poor health quality and outcomes. As demand for healthcare exceeds the supply of physicians, particularly in cardiovascular medicine, the need for physician assistants (PAs) increases. As PAs assume more responsibility for meeting the cardiovascular needs of Americans, their job satisfaction will become increasingly important. Knowledge of job satisfaction among PAs practicing in cardiovascular medicine will be necessary to recruit and retain PAs. This study sought to assess overall job satisfaction and factors of job satisfaction among PAs practicing cardiovascular medicine in the United States. The findings can guide employers, healthcare administrators, and policy makers to optimize job satisfaction among PAs in cardiology. METHODS A quantitative descriptive study was conducted. The Misener Nurse Practitioner Job Satisfaction Scale (MNNPJS) was modified with permission to assess job satisfaction of PAs in cardiovascular medicine. The modified MNPJSS is a 45-item survey using a 6-point Likert scale with responses ranging from very satisfied to very dissatisfied. The survey measured overall job satisfaction, 45 factors of job satisfaction, and six composite factors of job satisfaction: intra-practice partnership/collegiality; challenge/autonomy; professional, social, and community interaction; professional growth; time; and benefits. Participants were recruited from the database of the Association of PAs in Cardiology. The A.T. Still University institutional review board approved the study. RESULTS Overall job satisfaction of PAs practicing in cardiology was high. Most (87.3%) PAs were satisfied or very satisfied. Just over 1% expressed overall job dissatisfaction. No correlation was found between overall job satisfaction and age, sex, race, years of experience, income, type of employer, practice setting, hours worked per week, the number of patients seen per week, or the number of on-call hours per week. PAs were most satisfied with job factors related to the composite factor challenge/autonomy and these factors had the greatest correlation with overall job satisfaction. Factors that had the strongest correlation with overall job satisfaction, by Spearman rho test, were sense of value for work done (r = 0.6), opportunity to expand scope of practice (r = 0.56), ability to expand skills/ procedures within scope of practice (r = 0.56), sense of accomplishment (r = 0.55), and supervising physician (r = 0.53). The level of autonomy was the factor of greatest satisfaction among respondents and correlated with overall satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS Job satisfaction among PAs in cardiology was high regardless of age, race, or sex. There was no difference in the level of satisfaction based on income, type of employer, practice setting, hours worked per week, the number of patients seen per week, or the number of on-call hours per week. Respondents were most satisfied with intrinsic factors of job satisfaction. Factors related to the composite factor of challenge/autonomy were associated with the greatest satisfaction and had the strongest correlation with overall job satisfaction. The level of autonomy was the factor of greatest satisfaction among respondents and correlated with overall satisfaction. This study provides insight into factors of job satisfaction among PAs. Findings may guide employers, healthcare administrators, and policy makers to increase PAs' autonomy and expand their scope of practice. The results can guide research about strategies to enhance intrinsic factors of job satisfaction to recruit and retain PAs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]