Search

The misfolding of neuronal peptides such as Aβ40/42 in Alzheimer’s disease and cellular prion protein in scrapie induce abnormal aggregation of the peptides in the brain. The seeding of peptides’ oligomers from monomers is the initial step to form molten-globule states before abnormal aggregation. Therefore, compounds targeting the step are useful to clarify the mechanisms underlying aggregation of the proteins and Vitamin D derivatives, which can interact with both Aβ40 and cellular prion protein; however they show different effects in the oligomerization step of the proteins. We discuss the different effects of Vitamin D2 and Vitamin D3 in the interaction with these peptides in brain.

We present here environmental factors including pH shifts, temperature, and metal ions surrounding Aβ40 monomer to precede the oligomers. We also suggest a new idea to detect Aβ40 oligomers with anti-Aβ40 monoclonal antibody using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. This method involves the different sensitivity of the thermal shifts between Aβ40 monomer and the oligomers. The idea is useful for the diagnostics of Alzheimer's disease to detect Aβ40 oligomers in the serum from the patients.

Background and purpose: Aggregates of the protein amyloid-beta (Aβ) play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Most therapeutic approaches to AD do not target Aβ, so determination of the factor(s) that facilitate aggregation and discovering agents that prevent aggregation have great potential therapeutic value. Experimental approach: We investigated ex vivo the temperature-sensitive regions of Aβ1-40 (Aβ40) and their interactions with octapeptides derived from sequences within Aβ40 - β-sheet breaker peptides (βSBP) - using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and dot blot and far-UV circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. We measured changes within the physiological limits of temperature, using antibodies targeting epitopes 1-7, 5-10, 9-14 and 17-21 within Aβ40. Key results: Temperature-dependent conformational changes were observed in Aβ40 at epitopes 9-14 and 17-21 at 36-38 and 36-40°C respectively. The βSBPs 16-23 and 17-24, but not 15-22 and 18-25, could inhibit the changes. Moreover, βSBPs 16-23 and 17-24 increased digestion of Aβ40 by protease K, indicating a decreased aggregation of Aβ40, whereas βSBPs 15-22 and 18-25 did not increase this digestion. CD spectra revealed that β-sheet formation in Aβ40 at 38°C was reduced with βSBPs 16-23 and 17-24. Conclusions and implications: The epitopes 9-14 and 17-21 are the temperature-sensitive regions within Aβ40. The βSBPs, Aβ16-23 and 17-24 reversed temperature-induced β-sheet formation, and decreased Aβ40 aggregation. The results suggest that the 17-23 epitope of Aβ40 is crucially involved in preventing Aβ40 aggregation and consequent deposition of Aβ40 in AD brain. © 2009 The British Pharmacological Society.

In the present study we identified the epitopes of antibodies against amyloid beta-(1-42)-peptide (Abeta1-42): 4G8 reacted with peptides corresponding to residues 17-21, 6F/3D reacted with peptides corresponding to residues 9-14, and anti 5-10 reacted with peptides corresponding to residues 5-10. The study also yielded some insight into the Abeta1-42 structures resulting from differences in pH. An ELISA study using monoclonal antibodies showed that pH-dependent conformational changes occur in the 6F/3D and 4G8 epitopes modified at pH 4.6, but not in the sequences recognized by anti 1-7 and anti 5-10. This was unique to Abeta1-40 and Abeta1-42 and did not occur with Abeta1-16 or Abeta17-42. The reactivity profile of 4G8 was not affected by blockage of histidine residues of pH-modified Abeta1-40 and Abeta1-42 with diethyl pyrocarbonate; however, the mutant [Gln(11)]Abeta1-40 abrogated the unique pH-dependence towards 4G8 observed with Abeta1-40. These findings suggest that these epitopes are cryptic at pH 4.6, and that Glu(11) is responsible for the changes. We suggest that the abnormal folding of 6F/3D epitope affected by pH masked the 4G8 epitope. A study of the binding of metal ions to Abeta1-42 suggested that Cu(2+) and Zn(2+) induced a conformational transition around the 6F/3D region at pH 7.4, but did not affect the region when it was modified at pH 4.6. However, Fe(2+) had no effect, irrespective of pH. Abeta modified at pH 4.6 appeared to be relatively resistant to proteinase K compared with Abetas modified at pH 7.4, and the former might be preferentially internalized and accumulated in a human glial cell. Our findings suggest the importance of microenvironmental changes, such as pH, in the early stage of formation of Abeta aggregates in the glial cell.

We investigated the regulatory mechanisms responsible for release of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) from eosinophils activated by platelet-activating factor (PAF) and monitored intra-cellular pH (pHi) changes using a pH-sensitive fluorescent probe. We also explored the mechanisms by which eosinophils suppress T-lymphocyte proliferation induced by phytohaemagglutinin (PHA). In these experiments, a separated culture to investigate the ECP-mediated pathway and a coculture to identify the adhesion molecules involved in eosinophil-lymphocyte interactions were employed. Chymostatin (1x10(-6) M) inhibited ECP release by about 50% via stimulation by PAF or recombinant interleukin 5(rIL-5) plus IgG. PAF (1x10(-7) M) raised eosinophil pHi from 6.9 to 7.3 within 20 s and pretreatment of these cells with chymostatin (1x10(-6) M), but not with leupeptin or E64-d, completely prevented this increase. Calcium ionophore A23187 (1x10(-7) M) induced ECP release and raised pHi to within a range similar to that of PAF, however, chymostatin had no effect on either. Chymostatin reversed ECP-mediated suppression of PHA-induced T-lymphocyte proliferation in separated cultures, but not in cocultures. In coculture, eosinophils exhibited the same level of suppression of both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell proliferation in response to PHA. Monoclonal antibodies against CD11a, CD18 and CD54, but not CD11b, restored eosinophil suppression of T-lymphocyte proliferation which was chymostatin-resistant in coculture. Eosinophils were unable to suppress the proliferative response to lymphocytes to anti-CD3 stimulation. In conclusion, chymostatin specifically inhibited both the eosinophil pHi increase and ECP release induced by PAF. Eosinophils regulate PHA-induced T-lymphocyte proliferation via the ECP-mediation associated with chymotrypsin-like protease activity. These cells also control interactions with lymphocyte between adhesion molecules, CD11a, CD18 and CD54.