Search

Objective/background: The present study examined the associations among physical activity during different times of the day(i.e., morning, midday,evening) and days of the week(i.e., weekdays, weekend days) with restless legs syndrome(RLS) severity and sleep quality in adults with multiple sclerosis(MS)., Patients/methods: Participants(N = 39) completed the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Scale and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index as measures of RLS severity and global sleep quality, respectively, and wore an ActiGraph GT3X + on the non-dominant hip for seven days for measuring physical activity(i.e., light physical activity[LPA], moderate-to-vigorous physical activity[MVPA], and steps)., Results: There was a significant effect of time of day wherein participants had more midday activity compared with morning or evening for LPA, MVPA, and steps; there was no effect of day of the week. Spearman's rho correlations across the week indicated higher evening LPA, evening steps, and overall daily steps (ρ = -0.42,ρ = -0.51,ρ = -0.40,respectively) were associated with lower RLS severity. Similar associations were demonstrated for weekdays(ρ = -0.39,ρ = -0.50,ρ = -0.41,respectively) and weekend days(ρ = -0.44,ρ = -0.51,ρ = -0.39,respectively). Higher evening MVPA on weekend days(ρ = -0.42) was associated with lower RLS severity. Higher morning and overall daily LPA(ρ = 0.34,ρ = 0.33,respecitvely) were associated with worse sleep quality. Similar associations were demonstrated on weekdays(ρ = 0.33,ρ = 0.37,respectively) and more evening MVPA(ρ = 0.32) was associated with worse sleep quality. On weekend days, more morning MVPA(ρ = 0.42) was associated with worse sleep quality., Conclusions: Our results suggest that undertaking physical activity, particularly LPA and steps, in evenings may be important for managing symptoms of RLS without worsening sleep quality., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Study Objectives: Sleep problems are a common consequence of multiple sclerosis; however, there is limited evidence regarding the agreement between device-measured and self-reported sleep parameters in adults with multiple sclerosis. The present study examined the agreement between self-reported and device-measured parameters of sleep quality in a sample of adults with multiple sclerosis., Methods: Participants (n = 49) completed a 7-day sleep diary and wore a wrist-worn ActiGraph GT3×+ (ActiGraph Corp., Pensecola, FL) for seven consecutive nights to quantify self-reported and device-measured sleep parameters, respectively., Results: There was a significant discrepancy between self-reported and device-measured parameters of total time in bed (mean difference = 19.8 [51.3] min), sleep onset latency (mean difference = 22.2 [19.5] min), and frequency of awakenings during the night (mean difference = 12.8 [6.8]). Intraclass correlation estimates indicated poor agreement between methods on most parameters, except for total time in bed (intraclass correlation = 0.80). Bland-Altman plots suggested that total time in bed and total sleep time had acceptable levels of agreement and linear regression analyses indicated that sleep onset latency ( F = 113.91, B = -1.34, P < .001), number of awakenings ( F = 543.34, B = 1.85, P < .001), and sleep efficiency ( F = 18.39, B = -0.77, P < .001) had significant proportional bias., Conclusions: Our results draw attention to the discrepancies between sleep parameter measurements and highlight the importance of including both self-report and device-measured outcomes for a complete and accurate representation of sleep in adults with multiple sclerosis., Citation: Cederberg KLJ, Mathison BG, Schuetz ML, Motl RW. Discrepancies between self-reported and device-measured sleep parameters in adults with multiple sclerosis. J Clin Sleep Med . 2022;18(2):415-421., (© 2022 American Academy of Sleep Medicine.)

Objective/background: Adults with multiple sclerosis (MS) often present with conditions that mimic restless legs syndrome (RLS), thereby adding complexity into the assessment of RLS severity. The current gold-standard measures of RLS severity rely on a fixed seven-day time frame, which limits the ability of these measures for studying acute changes in RLS severity. The present study examined if subjective and objective scores from the suggested immobilization test (SIT) provide a valid and reliable acute measure of RLS severity in persons with MS., Patients/methods: Participants with MS and RLS (n = 20) and MS without RLS (n = 20) were matched by age, gender, and disability. All participants completed validated questionnaires for RLS severity followed by the SIT, conducted at 18:00 (±15 min) on the same day of the week for two consecutive weeks. Participants wore accelerometer devices for seven nights to capture periodic limb movements (PLMs) during the night., Results: Self-reported RLS severity during the SIT had excellent construct validity and convergent validity, but moderate test-retest reliability. Device-measured PLMs, while not themselves a direct measure of RLS severity, were significantly associated with PLMs during the night and had excellent test-retest reliability during the SIT in adults with MS., Conclusions: Our results suggest that the SIT represents a valid acute measure for capturing self-reported sensory aspects of RLS severity and should be considered in future research and clinical practice as a standardized acute measure of subjective RLS severity in adults with MS who present with RLS., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)