Search

International audience; OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of the spectrum, characteristics and outcomes of neurologic manifestations associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre retrospective study during the French coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic in March-April 2020. All COVID-19 patients with de novo neurologic manifestations were eligible. RESULTS: We included 222 COVID-19 patients with neurologic manifestations from 46 centres in France. Median (interquartile range, IQR) age was 65 (53-72) years and 136 patients (61.3%) were male. COVID-19 was severe or critical in 102 patients (45.2%). The most common neurologic diseases were COVID-19-associated encephalopathy (67/222, 30.2%), acute ischaemic cerebrovascular syndrome (57/222, 25.7%), encephalitis (21/222, 9.5%) and Guillain-Barré syndrome (15/222, 6.8%). Neurologic manifestations appeared after the first COVID-19 symptoms with a median (IQR) delay of 6 (3-8) days in COVID-19-associated encephalopathy, 7 (5-10) days in encephalitis, 12 (7-18) days in acute ischaemic cerebrovascular syndrome and 18 (15-28) days in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Brain imaging was performed in 192 patients (86.5%), including 157 magnetic resonance imaging (70.7%). Among patients with acute ischaemic cerebrovascular syndrome, 13 (22.8%) of 57 had multiterritory ischaemic strokes, with large vessel thrombosis in 16 (28.1%) of 57. Brain magnetic resonance imaging of encephalitis patients showed heterogeneous acute nonvascular lesions in 14 (66.7%) of 21. Cerebrospinal fluid of 97 patients (43.7%) was analysed, with pleocytosis found in 18 patients (18.6%) and a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR result in two patients with encephalitis. The median (IQR) follow-up was 24 (17-34) days with a high short-term mortality rate (28/222, 12.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical spectrum and outcomes of neurologic manifestations associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection were broad and heterogeneous, suggesting different underlying pathogenic processes.

Objective To describe safety and efficacy of rituximab in patients with systemic sclerosis. Methods We included 13 patients with systemic sclerosis treated with rituximab and pooled with 40 additional patients from the literature. SSc rituximab untreated patients were matched to rituximab treated ones. Results Thirteen patients who received rituximab and 26 rituximab-untreated patients were included. In comparison to 26 patients who did not received rituximab, FVC changes were not significantly different, whereas DLCO improved in 13 patients who received rituximab (0 [−4; 4] vs loss of −7 [−19; 0]; p = 0.05). Considering 7 rituximab treated and 14 untreated diffuse SSc, FVC was improved during the 24 [12; 46] months of follow up in dSSc who received rituximab (gain of 12 [7.5:14] % vs loss of 1.5 [−16.8; 2.5], (p = 0.003)). Pooled analysis of 53 patients (40 literature patients and 13 from personal series) showed significant improvement of median mRSS from 18 [8; 32] at baseline to 9 [4; 18] at M6 (p = 0.007), 13 [8; 18] at M12 (p = 0.008) and 10 [4; 16] at the last follow-up (p = 0.0002). FVC increased from 71% [66; 80] at baseline to 84% [75; 90] at M12 (p = 0.001). DLCO increased from 58% [39; 65] at M0 to 63% [53; 78] at M12 (p = 0.04). Conclusion Our personal data and pooled literature analysis suggest the efficacy of rituximab in the subset of diffuse SSc in particular in skin and interstitial disease involvements. The safety of rituximab seems to be reasonable and similar to previous data in other autoimmune diseases.