Search

Multiple studies have investigated the mechanisms of aggressive behavior in Drosophila; however, little is known about the effects of chronic fighting experience. Here, we investigated if repeated fighting encounters would induce an internal state that could affect the expression of subsequent behavior. We trained wild-type males to become winners or losers by repeatedly pairing them with hypoaggressive or hyperaggressive opponents, respectively. As described previously, we observed that chronic losers tend to lose subsequent fights, while chronic winners tend to win them. Olfactory conditioning experiments showed that winning is perceived as rewarding, while losing is perceived as aversive. Moreover, the effect of chronic fighting experience generalized to other behaviors, such as gap-crossing and courtship. We propose that in response to repeatedly winning or losing aggressive encounters, male flies form an internal state that displays persistence and generalization; fight outcomes can also have positive or negative valence. Furthermore, we show that the activities of the PPL1-γ1pedc dopaminergic neuron and the MBON-γ1pedc>α/β mushroom body output neuron are required for aversion to an olfactory cue associated with losing fights.

Significance To survive, an organism must adjust its behavior based upon past experiences. In Drosophila, aggression affects fitness as it ensures access to food and mating resources. Here, we show that upon repeated aggressive encounters, males adopt a winner or loser state that shows the qualities of persistence and generalization. Winning is perceived as rewarding, while losing is aversive. We also demonstrate that the activity of specific dopamine neurons is needed for males to avoid an odor previously paired with losing. Although the effects of losing and winning have been extensively studied in other species, our work advances the use of Drosophila as a model for circuit dissection of internal states that promote behavioral changes associated with winning or losing fights., Multiple studies have investigated the mechanisms of aggressive behavior in Drosophila; however, little is known about the effects of chronic fighting experience. Here, we investigated if repeated fighting encounters would induce an internal state that could affect the expression of subsequent behavior. We trained wild-type males to become winners or losers by repeatedly pairing them with hypoaggressive or hyperaggressive opponents, respectively. As described previously, we observed that chronic losers tend to lose subsequent fights, while chronic winners tend to win them. Olfactory conditioning experiments showed that winning is perceived as rewarding, while losing is perceived as aversive. Moreover, the effect of chronic fighting experience generalized to other behaviors, such as gap-crossing and courtship. We propose that in response to repeatedly winning or losing aggressive encounters, male flies form an internal state that displays persistence and generalization; fight outcomes can also have positive or negative valence. Furthermore, we show that the activities of the PPL1-γ1pedc dopaminergic neuron and the MBON-γ1pedc>α/β mushroom body output neuron are required for aversion to an olfactory cue associated with losing fights.

The perception and processing of rewarding events are essential for organismal survival. In Drosophila, several groups of neurons have been shown to mediate reward perception or processing. However, a complete description of the reward circuit is missing. Here, we describe a simple two-choice, high-throughput assay suitable for performing large neuronal activation screens for neural circuits involved in reward perception/processing. We characterized this assay using activation of neuropeptide F (NPF) neurons, a known rewarding experience for flies. Furthermore, using genetic intersectional strategies, we subdivided the NPF neurons into different classes and showed that the activation of a subset of small NPF neurons located in the dorsomedial brain is sufficient to trigger preference.

In their classic experiments, Olds and Milner showed that rats learn to lever press to receive an electric stimulus in specific brain regions. This led to the identification of mammalian reward centers. Our interest in defining the neuronal substrates of reward perception in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster prompted us to develop a simpler experimental approach wherein flies could implement behavior that induces self-stimulation of specific neurons in their brains. The high-throughput assay employs optogenetic activation of neurons when the fly occupies a specific area of a behavioral chamber, and the flies' preferential occupation of this area reflects their choosing to experience optogenetic stimulation. Flies in which neuropeptide F (NPF) neurons are activated display preference for the illuminated side of the chamber. We show that optogenetic activation of NPF neuron is rewarding in olfactory conditioning experiments and that the preference for NPF neuron activation is dependent on NPF signaling. Finally, we identify a small subset of NPF-expressing neurons located in the dorsomedial posterior brain that are sufficient to elicit preference in our assay. This assay provides the means for carrying out unbiased screens to map reward neurons in flies.

Genesis of midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons depends on Nurr1, a nuclear receptor expressed during development and adulthood in these neurons. Nurr1 is required for the expression of genes of dopaminergic phenotype such as tyrosine hydroxylase and DA transporter. The expression of the tyrosine kinase receptor RET also depends on Nurr1 during development. However, it is unknown whether RET expression is regulated by Nurr1 during adulthood, and the mechanism by which Nurr1 regulates RET expression. Using an adeno-associated vector-delivered anti-Nurr1 ribozyme, we knocked-down Nurr1 expression unilaterally in the substantia nigra (SN) of adult rats. Animals injected with the ribozyme displayed a 57.3% decrease in Nurr1 mRNA in the SN accompanied by decreased DA extracellular levels in the striatum. RET mRNA in the injected SN and RET protein in the ipsilateral striatum decreased 76.9% and 47%, respectively. Tyrosine hydroxylase and DA transporter mRNA did not change in Nurr1 knocked-down SN. Nurr1 induced the transcription of the human RET promoter in cell type and concentration-dependent manner. Nurr1 induction of RET promoter is independent of NBRE elements. These results show that the expression of RET in rat adult SN is regulated by Nurr1 and suggest that RET is a transcriptional target of this nuclear receptor.

Genesis of midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons depends on Nurr1, a nuclear receptor expressed during development and adulthood in these neurons. Nurr1 is required for the expression of genes of dopaminergic phenotype such as tyrosine hydroxylase and DA transporter. The expression of the tyrosine kinase receptor RET also depends on Nurr1 during development. However, it is unknown whether RET expression is regulated by Nurr1 during adulthood, and the mechanism by which Nurr1 regulates RET expression. Using an adeno-associated vector-delivered anti-Nurr1 ribozyme, we knocked-down Nurr1 expression unilaterally in the substantia nigra (SN) of adult rats. Animals injected with the ribozyme displayed a 57.3% decrease in Nurr1 mRNA in the SN accompanied by decreased DA extracellular levels in the striatum. RET mRNA in the injected SN and RET protein in the ipsilateral striatum decreased 76.9% and 47%, respectively. Tyrosine hydroxylase and DA transporter mRNA did not change in Nurr1 knocked-down SN. Nurr1 induced the transcription of the human RET promoter in cell type and concentration-dependent manner. Nurr1 induction of RET promoter is independent of NBRE elements. These results show that the expression of RET in rat adult SN is regulated by Nurr1 and suggest that RET is a transcriptional target of this nuclear receptor.