1. Effects of prenatal small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements on pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomized controlled trials in low- and middle-income countries.
- Author
-
Dewey, Kathryn, Wessells, K, Arnold, Charles, Adu-Afarwuah, Seth, Arnold, Benjamin, Ashorn, Per, Ashorn, Ulla, Garcés, Ana, Huybregts, Lieven, Krebs, Nancy, Lartey, Anna, Leroy, Jef, Maleta, Kenneth, Matias, Susana, Moore, Sophie, Mridha, Malay, Okronipa, Harriet, and Stewart, Christine
- Subjects
antenatal interventions ,balanced energy protein supplementation ,fetal growth restriction ,infant stunting ,infant wasting ,low birth weight ,maternal nutrition ,preterm birth ,Female ,Humans ,Infant ,Newborn ,Pregnancy ,Birth Weight ,Developing Countries ,Dietary Supplements ,Infant ,Low Birth Weight ,Lipids ,Micronutrients ,Pregnancy Outcome ,Prenatal Care ,Prenatal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena ,Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Undernutrition during pregnancy increases the risk of giving birth to a small vulnerable newborn. Small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements (SQ-LNSs) contain both macro- and micronutrients and can help prevent multiple nutritional deficiencies. OBJECTIVES: We examined the effects of SQ-LNSs provided during pregnancy compared with 1) iron and folic acid or standard of care (IFA/SOC) or 2) multiple micronutrient supplements (MMSs) and identified characteristics that modified the estimates of effects of SQ-LNSs on birth outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a 2-stage meta-analysis of individual participant data from 4 randomized controlled trials of SQ-LNSs provided during pregnancy (n = 5273). We generated study-specific and subgroup estimates of SQ-LNS compared with IFA/SOC or MMS and pooled the estimates. In sensitivity analyses, we examined whether the results differed depending on methods for gestational age dating, birth anthropometry, or study design. RESULTS: SQ-LNSs (compared with IFA/SOC) increased birth weight [mean difference: +49 g; 95% confidence interval (CI): 26, 71 g] and all birth anthropometric z-scores (+0.10-0.13 standard deviation); they reduced risk of low birth weight by 11%, newborn stunting by 17%, newborn wasting by 11%, and small head size by 15%. Only 2 trials compared SQ-LNSs and MMSs; P values for birth outcomes were >0.10 except for head circumference (e.g., z-score for gestational age: +0.11; 95% CI: -0.01, 0.23). Effect estimates for SQ-LNSs compared with IFA/SOC were greater among female infants and, for certain outcomes, among mothers with body mass index
- Published
- 2024