Search

Blue (Balaenoptera musculus) and fin (B. physalus) whales are prominent species in the California Current Ecosystem (CCE) using the area for migration and foraging. Blue whales migrate between tropical wintering grounds and higher latitude foraging grounds in the CCE, whereas fin whales may remain there year-round. We used Argos tracks of 182 blue (mean duration: 78 days) and 98 fin (mean duration: 35 days) whales tagged from 1994-2018 along the U.S. West Coast to examine residence time and occupancy in U.S. Navy training and testing areas. Bayesian hierarchical switching state-space model locations calculated from Argos tracks were used to provide residence time and proportion of tracking duration within each Navy area. We also calculated relative occupancy isopleths from the state space models, for both directed and non-directed movement, to assess spatial use of Navy areas. We then used generalized linear mixed models and beta regression to examine relationships between Navy area use and covariates, including six climate indices. Point Mugu Sea Range (PMSR) was the most heavily used Navy area by both species in terms of whale numbers, followed by the Southern California Range Complex (SOCAL). Residence time was longest in PMSR for blue whales and in the Northwest Training and Testing Study Area (NWTT) for fin whales. Blue whale use in PMSR was greater in summer versus autumn and for whales tagged in Southern versus Central California. Proportion of tracking duration decreased in all areas with increasing values of the Oceanic Niño Index (ONI), and in PMSR, with increasing values of the North Pacific Gyre Oscillation. Fin whale residence time was longer in PMSR during summer than winter or spring and decreased with increasing values of Habitat Compression Index and ONI. Proportion of tracking duration for fin whales was greatest in summer in PMSR and in winter in SOCAL and NWTT. Overlap of directed and non-directed movement was greatest in PMSR for both species. This assessment of blue and fin whale residence time and occupancy in Navy areas improves our understanding of potential threats these animals face, not only from military activities in Navy areas, but throughout the CCE. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mortality and injuries caused by ship strikes in U.S. waters are a cause of concern for the endangered population of blue whales (Balaenoptera musculus) occupying the eastern North Pacific. We sought to determine which areas along the U.S. West Coast are most important to blue whales and whether those areas change inter-annually. Argos-monitored satellite tags were attached to 171 blue whales off California during summer/early fall from 1993 to 2008. We analyzed portions of the tracks that occurred within U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone waters and defined the ‘home range’ (HR) and ‘core areas’ (CAU) as the 90% and 50% fixed kernel density distributions, respectively, for each whale. We used the number of overlapping individual HRs and CAUs to identify areas of highest use. Individual HR and CAU sizes varied dramatically, but without significant inter-annual variation despite covering years with El Niño and La Niña conditions. Observed within-year differences in HR size may represent different foraging strategies for individuals. The main areas of HR and CAU overlap among whales were near highly productive, strong upwelling centers that were crossed by commercial shipping lanes. Tagged whales generally departed U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone waters from mid-October to mid-November, with high variability among individuals. One 504-d track allowed HR and CAU comparisons for the same individual across two years, showing similar seasonal timing, and strong site fidelity. Our analysis showed how satellite-tagged blue whales seasonally used waters off the U.S. West Coast, including high-risk areas. We suggest possible modifications to existing shipping lanes to reduce the likelihood of collisions with vesse

Despite many years of study and protection, the North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis) remains on the brink of extinction. There is a crucial gap in our understanding of their habitat use in the migratory corridor along the eastern seaboard of the United States. Here, we characterize habitat suitability in migrating right whales in relation to depth, distance to shore, and the recently enacted ship speed regulations near major ports. We find that the range of suitable habitat exceeds previous estimates and that, as compared with the enacted 20 nautical mile buffer, the originally proposed 30 nautical mile buffer would protect more habitat for this critically endangered species. Malgre de nombreuses annees d'etude et de protection, la baleine franche du nord (Eubalaena glacialis) de l'Atlantique Nord demeure au bord de l'extinction. Il y a une faille essentielle dans notre comprehension de leur utilisation de l'habitat dans le corridor de migration le long de la cote est des E tats-Unis. Nous caracterisons ici la convenance des habitats pour les baleines franches en migration en relation avec la profondeur, la distance de la rive et la reglementation re-cemment en vigueur sur la vitesse des navires pres des ports principaux. Nous trouvons que la gamme d'habitats adequats depasse les estimations precedentes et que, par comparaison a la zone tampon de 20 milles marins presentement en vigueur, la zone tampon de 30 milles marins proposee a l'origine protegerait plus d'habitats pour cette espece serieusement menacee de disparition. [Traduit par la Redaction], Introduction Despite many years of study and protection, the North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis) remains on the brink of extinction (Fujiwara and Caswell 2001; Kraus et al. 2005). Although [...]