Search

This paper presents the parallelization of the NOABL program and its implementation on CRAY T3E parallel machine. The NOABL program is utilized to simulate windfield over complex terrain. This program runs on a processor grid (from 2 to 50 processors). The results obtained, show the interest of parallelizing this program and the SLOR method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: According to the literature, about one third of patients with brain ischemic symptoms lasting <24 hours, which are classified as TIAs according to the traditional "time-based" definition, show the presence of acute ischemic lesions at neuroimaging. Recent evidence has shown that the presence of acute ischemic lesions at neuroimaging may impact on the outcome of patients with transient ischemic symptoms treated with dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT). This uncertainty is even more compelling in recent years as short-term DAPT has become the standard treatment for any non-cardioembolic TIA or minor ischemic stroke., Methods: This is a pre-specified subgroup analysis from a prospective multicenter real-world study (READAPT). The analysis included patients with time-based TIA - i.e. those with ischemic symptoms lasting <24 hours - who started DAPT. In the whole population, we assessed the presence of acute brain ischemic lesions at neuroimaging and their association with the ABCD2 score. To assess the impact of acute brain ischemic lesions on 90-day prognosis, we performed a propensity score matching of patients with and without those lesions. We adopted a primary effectiveness outcome which was a composite of new stroke/TIA events and death due to vascular causes at 90 days., Results: We included 517 patients - 324 (62.7%) male - with a median (interquartile range - IQR) age of 74 (IQR 65-81) years; 144 patients (27.9%) had acute brain ischemic lesions at neuroimaging. The proportion of patients with brain ischemic lesions did not vary according to the ABCD2 score. At follow-up, 4 patients with brain ischemic lesions (2.8%) and 21 patients without lesions (5.6%) reported the primary effectiveness outcome, which was similar between the groups before (p=0.178) and after matching (p=0.518)., Conclusions: In our population, patients with transient ischemic symptoms and acute ischemic lesions at brain MRI had a risk of recurrent ischemic events similar to those without lesions. The risk of recurrent ischemic events was low in both groups.

Background: Short-term dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) is superior to single antiplatelet treatment (SAPT) for secondary prevention in non-cardioembolic minor ischemic stroke and high-risk TIA. As the real-world use of DAPT is broader than in trials, it is important to clarify its benefit/risk profile in a diverse population., Methods: Post-hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from the READAPT cohort and 3 prospective stroke registries including patients with mild-to-moderate (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score 0-10) ischemic stroke receiving early DAPT or SAPT. The primary effectiveness outcome was 90-day return to pre-stroke neurological functioning using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Secondary effectiveness outcomes were 90-day mRS shift, new ischemic stroke/TIA, vascular and all-cause death, 24-h early neurological improvement or deterioration. The safety outcome was 90-day intracranial hemorrhage., Results: We matched 1008 patients treated with DAPT and 1008 treated with SAPT. Compared to SAPT, patients treated with DAPT showed higher likelihood of 90-day primary effectiveness outcome (87.5% versus 84.4%, risk difference 3.1% [95%CI 0.1%-6.1%];p=0.047, risk ratio 1.03 [95%CI 1.01-1.07];p=0.043) and higher rate of 24-h early neurological improvement (25.3% versus 15.4%, risk difference 9.9% [95%CI 6.4%-13.4%];p<0.001, risk ratio 1.65 [95%CI 1.37-1.97];p<0.001). No differences were observed for other study outcomes. Subgroup analysis confirmed benefit of DAPT over SAPT for primary effectiveness outcome in patients with moderate stroke, those treated with intravenous thrombolysis and who received antiplatelet loading dose., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that DAPT use might be safe and more effective than SAPT even in the real-world and in patients who do not strictly fulfill criteria of landmark large clinical trials.

Background: The outcomes of minor ischemic stroke resulting from small artery occlusion (SAO-MIS) have not yet been characterized after dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) has become the standard of care. We provided updated figures on the short-term prognosis of SAO-MIS treated with early short-term DAPT and compared the outcomes of SAO-MIS versus non-SAO-MIS patients., Methods: This is a prespecified sub-analysis from a prospective multicentric real-world study (READAPT, NCT05476081) including patients with minor (NIHSS≤5) non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke treated with DAPT. The primary outcome was a composite of 90-day symptomatic ischemic stroke or major cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes were the 90-day ordinal distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, 90-day excellent functional outcome (mRS of 0 to 1), and 24-h early neurological deterioration (END). Safety outcomes were 90-day intracerebral hemorrhage, moderate-to-severe and any bleedings. All outcomes were compared between SAO-MIS and non-SAO-MIS patients., Results: We included 678 MIS, of whom 253 (37.3 %) were SAO-related. At 90 days, 3 patients with SAO-MIS had primary outcome (1.2 % [95 % CI 0.2 %-3.5 %]), which were all SAO-related ischemic strokes. For the secondary outcomes, most SAO-MIS patients (n = 191, 75.5 %) had 90-day excellent functional outcome and 12 had 24-h END (4.7 % [95 % CI 2.5 %-8.3 %]). Referring to safety outcomes, 90-day intracerebral hemorrhage occurred only in one patient with SAO-MIS (0.4 % [95 % CI 0.0 %- 2.2 %]). Compared to non-SAO-MIS, the 90-day risk of recurrent vascular events was significantly lower among SAO-MIS (aHR 0.24 [95 % CI 0.08-0.68]; p = 0.007), while there were not significant differences in other secondary outcomes, nor in the risk of safety events., Conclusions: Our findings show overall favorable short-term prognosis after SAO-MIS treated with DAPT. Future studies should investigate factors associated with residual stroke risk and long-term outcomes of SAO-MIS., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Andrea Zini reports compensation from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo for consultant services; from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, CSL Behring for speaking honoraria or other education services; from Daiichi Sankyo for meeting; from Bayer, and Astra Zeneca for participation on a Data Safety, Monitoring Board or Advisory Board; and he is member of ESO guidelines, ISA-AII guidelines, and IRETAS steering committee. Raffaele Ornello reports grants from Novartis and Allergan; compensation from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Eli Lilly and Company, and Novartis for other services; and travel support from Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. Simona Sacco reports compensation from Novartis, NovoNordisk, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Pfizer Canada, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, H. Lundbeck A/S, and Abbott Canada for consultant services; employment by University of L'Aquila; and compensation from Novartis for other services. Maurizio Paciaroni reports compensation from Daiichi Sankyo Company, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, and Pfizer Canada, Inc., for consultant services. Danilo Toni reports compensation from Alexion, Astra Zeneca, Medtronic, and Pfizer for consultant services and participation on a Data Safety, Monitoring Board or Advisory Board. The other authors report no conflicts., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

There is limited evidence on the outcomes and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) among patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in the context of cardiac diseases. Our study reviews MT in AIS within the context of cardiac diseases, aiming to identify existing and emerging needs and gaps. PubMed and Scopus were searched until December 31, 2023, using a combination of cardiological diseases and "mechanical thrombectomy" or "endovascular treatment" as keywords. Study design included case reports/series, observational studies, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses/systematic reviews. We identified 943 articles, of which 130 were included in the review. Results were categorized according to the cardiac conditions. MT shows significant benefits in patients with atrial fibrillation (n=139) but lacks data for stroke occurring after percutaneous coronary intervention (n=2) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (n=5). MT is beneficial in AIS attributable to infective endocarditis (n=34), although functional benefit may be limited. Controversy surrounds the functional outcomes and mortality of patients with AIS with heart failure undergoing MT (n=11). Despite technical challenges, MT appears feasible in aortic dissection cases (n=4), and in patients with left ventricular assist device or total artificial heart (n=10). Data on AIS attributable to congenital heart disease (n=4) primarily focus on pediatric cases requiring technical modifications. Treatment outcomes of MT in patients with cardiac tumors (n=8) vary because of clot consistency differences. After cardiac surgery stroke, MT may improve outcomes with early intervention (n=13). Available data outline the feasibility of MT in patients with AIS attributable to large-vessel occlusion in the context of cardiac diseases.

Background: The optimal treatment for acute minor ischemic stroke is still undefined. and options include dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT), intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), or their combination. We aimed to investigate benefits and risks of combining IVT and DAPT versus DAPT alone in patients with MIS., Methods and Results: This is a prespecified propensity score-matched analysis from a prospective multicentric real-world study (READAPT [Real-Life Study on Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Treatment in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack]). We included patients with MIS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission ≤5), without prestroke disability (modified Rankin scale [mRS] score ≤2). The primary outcomes were 90-day mRS score of 0 to 2 and ordinal mRS distribution. The secondary outcomes included 90-day risk of stroke and other vascular events and 24-hour early neurological improvement or deterioration (≥2-point National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score decrease or increase from the baseline, respectively). From 1373 patients with MIS, 240 patients treated with IVT plus DAPT were matched with 427 patients treated with DAPT alone. At 90 days, IVT plus DAPT versus DAPT alone showed similar frequency of mRS 0 to 2 (risk difference, 2.3% [95% CI -2.0% to 6.7%]; P =0.295; risk ratio, 1.03 [95% CI 0.98-1.08]; P =0.312) but more favorable ordinal mRS scores distribution (odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI 0.41-0.79]; P <0.001). Compared with patients treated with DAPT alone, those combining IVT and DAPT had higher 24-hour early neurological improvement (risk difference, 20.9% [95% CI 13.1%-28.6%]; risk ratio, 1.59 [95% CI 1.34-1.89]; both P <0.001) and lower 90-day risk of stroke and other vascular events (hazard ratio, 0.27 [95% CI 0.08-0.90]; P =0.034). There were no differences in safety outcomes., Conclusions: According to findings from this observational study, patients with MIS may benefit in terms of better functional outcome and lower risk of recurrent events from combining IVT and DAPT versus DAPT alone without safety concerns., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05476081.

Background and Purpose: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) proved the efficacy of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in secondary prevention of minor ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA). We aimed at evaluating effectiveness and safety of short-term DAPT in real-world, where treatment use is broader than in RCTs., Methods: READAPT (REAl-life study on short-term Dual Antiplatelet treatment in Patients with ischemic stroke or Transient ischemic attack) (NCT05476081) was an observational multicenter real-world study with a 90-day follow-up. We included patients aged 18+ receiving short-term DAPT soon after ischemic stroke or TIA. No stringent NIHSS and ABCD 2 score cut-offs were applied but adherence to guidelines was recommended. Primary effectiveness outcome was stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) or death due to vascular causes, primary safety outcome was moderate-to-severe bleeding. Secondary outcomes were the type of ischemic and hemorrhagic events, disability, cause of death, and compliance to treatment., Results: We included 1920 patients; 69.9% started DAPT after an ischemic stroke; only 8.9% strictly followed entry criteria or procedures of RCTs. Primary effectiveness outcome occurred in 3.9% and primary safety outcome in 0.6% of cases. In total, 3.3% cerebrovascular ischemic recurrences occurred, 0.2% intracerebral hemorrhages, and 2.7% bleedings; 0.2% of patients died due to vascular causes. Patients with NIHSS score ⩽5 and those without acute lesions at neuroimaging had significantly higher primary effectiveness outcomes than their counterparts. Additionally, DAPT start >24 h after symptom onset was associated with a lower likelihood of bleeding., Conclusions: In real-world, most of the patients who receive DAPT after an ischemic stroke or a TIA do not follow RCTs entry criteria and procedures. Nevertheless, short-term DAPT remains effective and safe in this population. No safety concerns are raised in patients with low-risk TIA, more severe stroke, and delayed treatment start., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: AZ reports compensation from Angels Initiative, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, CSL Behring, Bayer, and Astra Zeneca; and he is member of ESO guidelines, ISA-AII guidelines, and IRETAS steering committee. RO reports compensations from Novartis and Allergan, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Eli Lilly and Company, SS reports compensations from Novartis, NovoNordisk, Allergan, AstraZeneca, Pfizer Canada, Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, H. Lundbeck A/S, and Abbott Canada; employment by Università degli Studi dell’Aquila. MPa reports compensation from Daiichi Sankyo Company, Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer, and Pfizer Canada, Inc. DT reports compensation from Alexion, AstraZeneca, Medtronic, and Pfizer. The other authors report no conflicts.

Introduction: The best therapeutic strategy for patients with mechanical heart valves (MHVs) having acute ischemic stroke during treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) remain unclear. Being so, we compared the outcomes for: (i) full dose heparin along with VKA (bridging therapy group) and (ii) restarting VKA without heparin (nonbridging group)., Patients and Methods: For this multicenter observational cohort study, data on consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients with MHV was retrospectively collected from prospective registries. Propensity score matching (PSM) was adopted to adjust for any treatment allocation confounders. The primary outcome was the composite of stroke, systemic embolism, symptomatic cerebral bleeding, and major extracerebral bleeding at 90 days., Results: Overall, 255 out of 603 patients (41.3%) received bridging therapy: 36 (14.1%) had combined outcome, compared with 28 (8.0%) in the nonbridging group (adjusted OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.05-3.18; p  = 0.03). Within the bridging group, 13 patients (5.1%) compared to 12 (3.4%) in the nonbridging group had an ischemic outcome (adjusted OR 1.71; 95% CI 0.84-3.47; p  = 0.2); major bleedings were recorded in 23 (9.0%) in the bridging group and 16 (4.6%) in the nonbridging group (adjusted OR 1.88; 95% CI 0.95-3.73; p  = 0.07). After PSM, 36 (14.2%) of the 254 bridging patients had combined outcome, compared with 23 (9.1%) of 254 patients in the nonbridging group (OR 1.66; 95% CI 0.95-2.85; p  = 0.07)., Conclusion: Acute ischemic stroke patients with MHV undergoing bridging therapy had a marginally higher risk of ischemic or hemorrhagic events, compared to nonbridging patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Paciaroni received honoraria as a member of the speaker bureau of Sanofi-Aventis, Bristol Meyer Squibb, Daiiki Sankyo and Pfizer. Becattini received honoraria as a member of the speaker bureau of Bristol Meyer Squibb and Bayer. Michel received research grant by Swiss National Science Foundation, Swiss Heart Foundation and University of Lausanne. Tsivgoulis has received funding for travel or speaker’s honoraria from Bayer, Pfizer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. He has served on scientific advisory boards for Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Daiichi Sankyo. Toni has received personal fees from Abbott, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, and Pfizer. Caso received honoraria as a member of the speaker bureau of Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and Daiichi Sankyo (all fees were paid to Associazione Ricerca Stroke, Umbria). She received honoraria as consultant or advisory board member of Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, and Pfizer. Ntaios reports speaker fees/advisory board/ research support from Bayer, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim and Elpen. All fees are paid to his institution. Sacco has received personal fees as speaker or advisor from Abbott, Allergan, Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis, NovoNordisk, Teva and research grants from Allergan, Novartis, and Uriach. Vanacker received honoraria as a member of the speaker bureau and as advisory board of Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Meyer Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, EG and Pfizer. Del Sette has received honoraria for speaking from Bayer and Boehringer Ingelheim. Zedde received speaking and consulting fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Amicus Therapeutics, Sanofi Genzyme, Abbott, and Takeda. Cappellari has received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer – Bristol Meyer Squibb, and Daiichi Sankyo. Flomin has received personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer and Takeda, grants, personal fees and nonfinancial support from Pfizer, personal fees and nonfinancial support from Sanofi Genzyme. Ornello has received nonfinancial support from Novartis, Allergan, and Teva. Giannopoulos has received funding for travel from Bayer and speaker’s honoraria from Pfizer. Zini has received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behing and Alexion, Astra Zeneca. The other authors report no conflicts.

Purpose: To perform a systematic review searching for differences in the side effects of antiseizure medications (ASMs) with respect to sex in pediatric patients with epilepsy., Methods: We carried out a comprehensive literature search of the PubMed database and all results up to April 2020 were included. Titles, abstracts, and full texts of the articles were screened by two independent reviewers. We included all studies evaluating the side effects of ASMs in patients with epilepsy younger than 18 years, with reference to the two sexes. Studies on ASMs used for indications other than epilepsy were excluded., Results: A total of 5164 studies were identified. Sixty-seven studies were finally included, 5 of them also including adult patients in the sample. Sixteen studies revealed sex-related differences in side effects of ASMs, disclosing a higher frequency of general side effects in girls: a higher risk of overweight, hyperammonaemia, high leptin levels, and carnitine deficiency in girls on valproic acid; a lower height increase, an increased risk of weight loss, the anecdotical occurrence of acute psychosis in girls on topiramate; a higher risk of retinal toxicity in boys on vigabatrin., Conclusion: The effect of sex on susceptibility to side effects of ASMs is poorly investigated with sparse results, and it could be underestimated. The findings of our study point to the presence of sex differences which should be thoroughly investigated to be confirmed, highlighting the need for a systematic evaluation of sex as a determinant variable influencing the response to medications in clinical research., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Giuliano received honoraria as a speaker and or congress and travel expenses from EISAI and UCB. Dr. Zambrelli received honoraria as congress and travel expenses from Lusofarmaco. Dr. Cantalupo received speaker honoraria from "GW Pharmaceuticals" and from "Grupo de Trabajo de Epilepsia de la Sociedad Española de Neurología Pediátrica (SENEP)". Dr. La Neve has received speaker's or consultancy fees from Eisai, Mylan, Sanofi, Bial, GW, UCB Pharma, Arvelle Therapeutics, Angelini Pharma and Neuraxpharma. Dr. Mostacci received honoraria as a speaker and or congress and travel expenses from EISAI, Sanofi, GW Pharma. Dr. Vecchio, Dr. Mastrangelo, Dr. Durante, Dr. Ermio have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving specialty medications have conditions that are often complex, high cost, and high need. Prompt treatment initiation is essential for the appropriate management of many conditions treated by specialty products. Improving the turnaround time (TAT) of specialty pharmacy prescriptions helps ensure patients receive the medication they need in the necessary time frame to optimize health outcomes. Despite a clinical justification for improved TAT, there is a gap in the literature describing what factors impact these times. OBJECTIVE: To determine factors that may influence specialty pharmacy TATs and to identify good practices that specialty pharmacies use to improve TAT. METHODS: This qualitative study used 4 focus groups with specialty pharmacy subject matter experts. Each focus group represented different specialty pharmacy types, including health system, payer-associated, retail chain, and independent specialty pharmacies. Attitudes, beliefs, and experiences regarding specialty pharmacy TAT were captured. Open-ended questions and prompts eliciting impediments, facilitators, and good practices associated with specialty pharmacy TAT were asked of participants. Data were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Fifteen individuals participated across 4 focus groups: payer-associated (n = 4), independent (n = 3), health system (n = 5), and retail chain (n = 3) specialty pharmacies. Average TATs varied across specialty pharmacy type and by prescription type (clean vs intervention). Several interconnected themes were identified, including barriers with health benefits formulary management, prior authorization delays, differences in requirements between managed care organizations, and miscommunication with physicians, among others. Five subthemes were identified during the discussion of factors influencing TAT, including patient characteristics, pharmacy characteristics, provider characteristics, clinical situations, and health benefit design and formulary considerations. Pharmacy workflow improvements through technology integration are thought to improve TAT. In addition, participants noted facilitators including specialization among pharmacists and technicians in certain diseases, particularly hepatitis C and cancer. Some good practices included using patient financial advocates, technology integration, and a structured patient onboarding process, which were found to minimize delays caused by prior authorization, communication, and formularies. CONCLUSIONS: A multitude of factors impacting specialty pharmacy prescription TAT were identified. Multidisciplinary coordination between pharmacies, physicians, and managed care organizations is essential to ensure patients receive medications in the necessary time frame to optimize health outcomes. DISCLOSURES: This study was conducted with support from Pfizer.

BACKGROUND: A growing body of evidence supports the need for health systems to shift towards addressing social determinants of health (SDoH) as part of routine care. However, little is known about the state of the industry in terms of procurement and use of SDoH data. OBJECTIVES: To assess stakeholders' perceptions and experiences in collecting and utilizing SDoH data. METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted using a 24-item electronic survey. The pilot-tested survey was distributed to a diverse convenience sample of 94 health care stakeholder organizations that are members of the Pharmacy Quality Alliance organization. Survey responses were collected from November to December 2020. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze responses. RESULTS: A total of 25 respondents completed the survey (response rate = 26.6%). More than half (n = 14, 56.0%) collected and tracked SDoH data, and of those, most (n = 6, 42.85%) reported using organization-specific tools instead of standardized SDoH tools. Economic stability and health and health care indicators were the most frequently identified types of SDoH data collected. Participants reported that both identifying (mean = 3.88 ± SD = 0.88; 1 = not important to 5 = extremely important) and addressing (3.88 ± 0.93) patients' SDoH were moderately important to their organization. Lack of standard data format (72.0%), lack of time (52.0%), and lack of technological capabilities (44.0%) were the most commonly reported barriers to collecting SDoH data. However, value-based payment programs that reward addressing SDoH needs (76.0%) and a coding structure or reimbursement mechanism for identification and management of SDoH (60.0%) were most commonly reported as mechanisms to overcome SDoH data collection barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Health care stakeholders consider patient SDoH indicators important but report significant challenges in collecting these data. Solutions that address data standardization, time burden, technological barriers, and the offering of incentives could facilitate its collection and effective use. DISCLOSURES: Pharmacy Quality Alliance received an unrestricted grant from Pfizer, Inc, to support this work.

Objectives: This work aimed to report the demographic and clinical characteristics of two new cases with non-paraneoplastic anti-Hu-associated gut motility impairment, and perform a thorough revision covering anti-Hu-associated paraneoplastic (PGID) and non-paraneoplastic (nPGID) gastrointestinal dysmotility., Background: Several case series have clearly established a relationship between certain type of cancers, the development of circulating anti-Hu antibodies, and the concomitant usually severe gastrointestinal dysmotility; in contrast, a few studies focused on anti-Hu-associated nPGID., Methods: We searched for studies regarding anti-Hu-associated gastrointestinal manifestations and extracted data concerning clinical characteristics of patients, including specific demographic, oncological, neurological, gastrointestinal, histological, and treatment response features., Results: Forty-nine articles with a total of 59 cases of anti-Hu-associated gastrointestinal dysmotility were analyzed. The patients' age at symptom onset significantly differed between PGID and nPGID (median 61 vs 31 years, p < 0.001). Most cancers (95%) in PGID were detected within 24 months from the beginning of gastrointestinal symptoms. The impairment of gastrointestinal motility was generalized (i.e., involving the whole gut) in 59.3% of patients, with no significant differences between PGID vs nPGID group. nPGID patients showed a better response to immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive treatment and a longer life expectancy., Conclusions: Anti-Hu-associated gastrointestinal dysmotility covers a wide clinical spectrum. Patients with otherwise unexplained gastrointestinal dysmotility, especially when associated with other neurological symptoms, should be tested for anti-Hu antibodies regardless age of onset and disease duration. Compared to PGID, nPGID occurs in younger patients with a long duration of disease., (© 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Fatal familial insomnia (FFI) is a rare inherited prion disease characterized by sleep, autonomic, and motor disturbances. Neuro-ophthalmological abnormalities have been reported at the onset of disease, although not further characterized. We analyzed video recordings of eye movements of 6 patients with FFI from 3 unrelated kindreds, seen within 6 months from the onset of illness. Excessive saccadic intrusions were the most prominent findings. In patients with severe insomnia, striking saccadic intrusions are an early diagnostic clue for FFI. The fact that the thalamus is the first structure affected in FFI also suggests its role in the control of steady fixation. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:823-827., (© 2021 American Neurological Association.)