Search

Introduction: Quality of surgical care is understudied for lobular inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), which is less common, more chemotherapy-resistant, and more mammographically occult than ductal IBC. We compared guideline-concordant surgery (modified radical mastectomy [MRM] without immediate reconstruction following chemotherapy) for lobular versus ductal IBC., Methods:  Female individuals with cT4dM0 lobular and ductal IBC were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2010-2019. Modified radical mastectomy receipt was identified via codes for "modified radical mastectomy" or "mastectomy" and "≥10 lymph nodes removed" (proxy for axillary lymph node dissection). Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and t-tests were used., Results: A total of 1456 lobular and 10,445 ductal IBC patients were identified; 599 (41.1%) with lobular and 4859 (46.5%) with ductal IBC underwent MRMs (p = 0.001). Patients with lobular IBC included a higher proportion of individuals with cN0 disease (20.5% lobular vs. 13.7% ductal) and no lymph nodes examined at surgery (31.2% vs. 24.5%) but were less likely to be node-negative at surgery (12.7% vs. 17.1%, all p < 0.001). Among those who had lymph nodes removed at surgery, patients with lobular IBC also had fewer lymph nodes excised versus patients with ductal IBC (median [interquartile range], 7 (0-15) vs. 9 (0-17), p = 0.001)., Conclusions: Lobular IBC patients were more likely to present with node-negative disease and less likely to be node-negative at surgery, despite having fewer, and more frequently no, lymph nodes examined versus ductal IBC patients. Future studies should investigate whether these treatment disparities are because of surgical approach, pathologic assessment, and/or data quality as captured in the NCDB., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Erector spinae plane block is a recently introduced block with a wide range of indications. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on early post-operative pain relief in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy. We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled study in a tertiary care institute. Sixty-five patients were enrolled. Final analysis was performed on 58 patients randomized into two groups. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block with 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine was given using a 18 gauge needle. No block was given in the other group. All patients received general anesthesia. Primary outcome measure was 24-hour analgesic consumption. Secondary outcome measures included intra-operative fentanyl consumption, time to first analgesic request, Visual Analog Scale score, nausea score, sedation score, wound quality and patient satisfaction score. Post-operative additional analgesics and intra-operative fentanyl were significantly reduced in patients receiving erector spinae plane block. Time to rescue analgesia was significantly delayed. Visual Analog Scale score was significantly lower at all time intervals. Post-operative nausea at various time intervals was also less. Patient satisfaction score was also noted on a 5-point scale and there was a statistical significant difference. We concluded that erector spinae plane block is a safe technique and provides good analgesia in breast surgery., (Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Medical Gas Research.)

Background: Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor in females worldwide. During disease development, breast cancer patients suffer anxious and depressed, which may lead to worse quality of life or even higher mortality. Esketamine has been regarded as an antidepressant in breast cancer patients with mild or moderate depression. Here, we wonder whether the administration of esketamine could reduce the postoperative depressive symptom score of breast cancer patients who have no preoperative depression., Methods: A total of 64 patients treated with unilateral modified radical mastectomy were randomly divided into an experimental group (esketamine group, Group E) and a control group (Group C), with 32 cases in each one. After anesthesia induction, Group C received 0.2 ml/kg of normal saline intravenously and Group E was administered 0.2 mg/kg intravenous esketamine. The primary outcome was the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores. The secondary outcomes included the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for pain, inflammatory markers, perioperative-related indicators, and the incidence of postoperative delirium, nausea and vomiting., Results: The PHQ-9 score on postoperative day (POD) 1 in Group E declined from the preoperative level, while the score in Group C was higher than before, and the former was far lower than the latter (P = 0.047). There is no statistically significant difference in PHQ-9 scores between Group E and Group C on POD 3, 7, and 30. Moreover, the postoperative leukocyte level of Group E was higher than that of Group C, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.030)., Conclusions: A single subanesthetic dose of esketamine can result in lower postoperative score on subthreshold depressive symptoms compared to the Group C on POD 1, without increasing the occurrence of postoperative adverse reactions., Trial Registration: Registration number: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2200057028. Date of registration: 26/02/2022., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: Breast cancer, a prevalent global malignancy in women, necessitates a comprehensive treatment approach, with surgery playing a crucial role. Severe acute pain is common post-radical breast cancer surgery, emphasizing the significance of hemodynamic stability and postoperative pain control for optimal outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on these parameters in ASA scores 1-2 patients undergoing modified radical breast cancer surgery with general anesthesia., Patients and Methods: Forty-eight patients were divided into two groups: a general anesthesia group, with erector spinae plane block (GA+ESPB), and a control group receiving only general anesthesia (GA). Hemodynamic parameters were continuously monitored, and postoperative pain was assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) at various time points., Results: Ultrasound-guided ESPB effectively maintained hemodynamic stability and reduced postoperative pain in breast cancer surgery patients. Statistically significant differences were observed in heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure between the GA and GA+ESPB groups at multiple time points (p < 0.05). VAS scores showed a significant interaction time*group (p < 0.001), with consistent differences between the groups at all time points (p ≤ 0.001)., Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided ESPB application proved effective in preserving hemodynamic stability and managing postoperative pain in modified radical breast cancer surgery. The technique demonstrates promise in minimizing complications related to hemodynamic variations and postoperative pain, contributing to a comprehensive approach to breast cancer surgical treatment.

Introduction: Seroma development after mastectomy is a common complication. Continued seroma causes increased outpatient visits, repeated aspirations, infection, delayed healing, delayed adjuvant therapy, and increased cost. Various treatments are being attempted to prevent and reduce seroma development. We examined the effects of flap fixation on seroma using absorbable sutures after modified radical mastectomy (MRM)., Methods: The prospectively recorded data of patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer were analyzed retrospectively. 72 consecutive patients who underwent MRM were included in the study. Patients who underwent MRM in the same way by the same surgeon were divided into two groups: the group whose wound was closed by fixing the flap to the chest wall with an absorbable suture (group A), and the group whose wound was closed with the classical method (group B). The groups were compared in terms of seroma development, clinicopathological data, and early complications., Results: Drain removal time and the total amount of drained fluid in group A patients were significantly lower than drain removal time and the total amount of drained fluid in group B patients ( P < .001). Similarly, the amount of aspirated seroma in the control examinations of group A patients was significantly lower than that in group B ( P < .05). Group B needed re-aspiration significantly more than group A ( P < .05)., Conclusions: Flap fixation with suture after MRM is a method that reduces seroma formation and the amount of drained fluid, enables early removal of the drain, prevents delay in starting adjuvant treatment, is more comfortable for the patient and physician, and is also inexpensive., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

We attempted to clarify clinical value of KiSS-1 and MMP-2 levels in breast cancer (BC) tissue in evaluating prognosis of elderly BC patients after modified radical mastectomy (MCM). The data of 192 elderly female BC patients receiving MCM in our hospital from January 2018 to December 2022 were collected. According to prognosis, patients received division into poor prognosis group (n = 43) and good prognosis group (n = 149). The serum CEA level and KiSS-1 and MMP-2 levels in BC tissue received measurement in both groups. The predictive value of KiSS-1 and MMP-2 alone and jointly in adverse prognosis of elderly BC patients after MCM received assessment. Results showed that No statistical significance was exhibited between both groups in general data (P > 0.05). The serum CEA level and MMP-2 expression in BC tissue in poor prognosis group exhibited elevation relative to those in good prognosis group, and KiSS-1 expression in BC tissue in poor prognosis group exhibited depletion relative to that in good prognosis group, indicating statistical significance (P < 0.05). The high-level KiSS-1 might be a protective element for adverse prognosis of elderly BC patients after MCM, and high-level CEA and MMP-2 might be an independent risk element for adverse prognosis of elderly BC patients after MCM (P < 0.05). KiSS-1 and MMP-2 alone and jointly predicted AUC of adverse prognosis in elderly BC patients after MCM were 0.93, 0.802 and 0.958, with certain predictive values; when cutoff values of KiSS-1 and MMP-2 were 6.15 and 2.26, the predictive value was the best. In conclusion, KiSS-1 and MMP-2 levels in BC tissue possess relation to adverse prognosis of MCM. KiSS-1 and MMP-2 levels in elderly BC patients before surgery may be detected in the future to assist in prognosis evaluation of elderly BC patients after MCM.

Objective: This research aims to assess the clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in combination with modified radical mastectomy (MRM) for stage II-III breast cancer (BC) patients and its impact on serum tumor markers (STMs)., Methods: The study included 119 stage II-III BC patients treated between June 2018 and June 2021. Among them, 55 cases underwent MRM (reference group), while 64 cases received NACT followed by MRM (research group). We compared intraoperative parameters (blood loss, operation time, hospital stay), clinical outcomes, the incidence of postoperative adverse events (AEs), changes in STMs (CA125, CA153, CEA), and one-year postoperative quality of life (QOL)., Results: In comparison to the reference group, the research group exhibited significantly lower intraoperative blood loss, shorter operation times, reduced hospital stays, and higher rates of disease remission. Notably, the research group experienced a lower overall incidence of AEs, including skin flap necrosis, subscalp effusion, infection, and upper limb lymphedema. Postoperatively, all STMs in the research group exhibited statistically significant reductions and were lower than those in the reference group. Additionally, all QOL subscales demonstrated improvements and higher scores in the research group., Conclusions: NACT followed by MRM represents an effective approach for enhancing surgical outcomes and clinical efficacy in stage II-III BC patients. This combination therapy also reduces the risk of postoperative AEs and leads to favorable changes in STMs and postoperative QOL levels.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the advantages and disadvantages of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients with left-sided breast cancer who underwent hypofractionated IMRT after a modified radical mastectomy., Materials and Methods: Twenty patients who required adjuvant radiotherapy after modified radical mastectomy were randomly selected, and a specified dose of 43.5 Gy/15 F was used to plan for IMRT or VMAT. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were utilized to evaluate the dose distribution of the planning target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risk (OARs)., Results: VMAT demonstrated a greater and more uniform dose distribution of PTVs and lower number of monitor units. No significant differences were found in V5 of the affected lung and heart between the two techniques (P > 0.05). The V10, V20, V30, and Dmean of the affected lung and V10, V20, V30, V40, Dmean, and Dmax of the whole heart were better in the VMAT than in the IMRT (P < 0.05). The Dmean and Dmax of the left anterior descending (LAD) branch of the coronary artery of the heart were better in the VMAT (P < 0.05), and the use of the VMAT effectively reduced the cardiopulmonary dose. A significant advantage of V30 and Dmean was also found in VMAT (P < 0.05)., Conclusion: These findings indicate that VMAT has higher clinical significance than IMRT, because it improved the dose distribution in the target area, reduced the cardiopulmonary dose, protected the OARs (e.g. thyroid), and shortened the treatment duration., (Copyright © 2023 Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.)

Introduction: Breast conserving surgery (BCS) followed by radiotherapy (BCT) and modified radical mastectomy (MRM) are the most common surgical techniques utilized in treatment of early breast cancer (EBC) with similar overall survival and recurrence rates. Western literature suggests that these treatments impact the quality of life (QOL) of patients variably. There are no comparison studies on these treatments as per patient's QOL in East Africa. The objectives were to compare the QOL of patients with EBC at least one year after BCT or MRM and assess the factors that affect this QOL., Methods: this was a cross-sectional study conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital-Nairobi (AKUHN). Eligible female patients with EBC who had undergone either BCT or MRM between January 2013 and December 2018 were invited to fill out European Organization for the Treatment and Research of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30). Data on participant demographics and clinical information was also obtained. Average scores for each aspect of QOL were obtained and overall means for each surgical treatment were compared. Linear regression was done to assess the factors that affected this QOL., Results: forty-two patients had BCS/BCT and 39 had MRM. Patients who had undergone BCS/BCT had a better overall QOL than those who had undergone MRM (p=0.0149). Multivariate analysis revealed that five years from time of surgery, level of education and diabetes mellitus significantly (p<0.05) affected the QOL of these patients., Conclusion: after one year from surgery for EBC, patients who had undergone BCS/BCT had a better QOL as compared to MRM., Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright: Senoga Andrew et al.)

Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among females, and surgery plays a central role in its treatment. Surgical treatments may have a negative psychological impact on women's mental health regarding their body image. The purpose of this study was to compare the psychological health insights pertaining to objectified body consciousness scores before and after the surgery and also to observe whether these scores were comparable across the surgery types., Materials and Methods: This retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained data included 706 breast carcinoma patients who underwent either Breast Conservation Surgery or Modified Radical Mastectomy at tertiary care Cancer Centre, between the years 2020 to 2021. A validated questionnaire of Objectified Body Consciousness was used to obtain responses at diagnosis and at 6 months postsurgery and final scores were calculated for both instances. Two sample t-tests/analysis of variance and Chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables respectively., Results: Out of total 706 breast cancer patients, 402 patients underwent Breast Conservation Surgery and 304 underwent Modified radical mastectomy procedure. A statistically significant change was seen in the mean Objectified Body Consciousness Score (14.22 ± 15.44) for all patients when compared preoperatively(72.72 ± 11.38) and postoperatively(60.15 ± 17.58). This change was higher in the Modified Radical Mastectomy group(29.38 ± 11.53). Also, statistically significant rise in scores was seen with increasing age., Conclusion: We could affirmatively conclude in our study that younger breast cancer patients and all patients who underwent a Modified Radical Mastectomy, had more psychological apprehension with the body image postsurgery, signifying these groups should be encouraged by healthcare professionals to reach out for counselling at the earliest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study evaluated the effect of a combined infusion of dexmedetomidine and esketamine on the quality of recovery in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy., Methods: A total of 135 patients were randomly divided into three groups: dexmedetomidine group (group D) received dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg loading, 0.4 µg/kg/h infusion), dexmedetomidine plus low-dose esketamine group (group DE 1 ) received dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg loading, 0.4 µg/kg/h infusion) and esketamine (0.5 mg/kg loading, 2 µg/kg/min infusion), dexmedetomidine plus high-dose esketamine group (group DE 2 ) received dexmedetomidine (0.5 µg/kg loading, 0.4 µg/kg/h infusion) and esketamine (0.5 mg/kg loading, 4 µg/kg/min infusion). The primary outcome was the overall quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores at 1 day after surgery. The secondary endpoints were total QoR-15 scores at 3 days after surgery, propofol and remifentanil requirement, awaking and extubation time, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, rescue analgesic, nausea and vomiting, bradycardia, excessive sedation, nightmares, and agitation., Results: The overall QoR-15 scores were much higher in groups DE 1 and DE 2 than in groups D 1 and D 3 days after surgery ( P < 0.05). VAS pain scores at 6, 12, 24 h postoperatively, propofol and remifentanil requirements were significantly lower in groups DE 1 and DE 2 than in group D ( P < 0.05). Compared with group D, awaking time, extubation time, and post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay were significantly prolonged in groups DE 1 and DE 2 ( P < 0.05) and were much longer in group DE 2 than in group DE 1 ( P < 0.05). The proportion of postoperative rescue analgesics and bradycardia was higher and the incidence of excessive sedation was lower in group D than in groups DE 1 and DE 2 ( P < 0.05)., Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine plus esketamine partly improved postoperative recovery quality and decreased the incidence of bradycardia but prolonged awaking time, extubation time, and PACU stay, especially dexmedetomidine plus 4 µg/kg/min esketamine., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2023 Huang et al.)

Objective: To investigate the choice of immediate breast reconstructive methods and asso-ciated outcomes after modified radical mastectomy., Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy in Peking University Third Hospital from January 2009 to May 2019. The reconstructive methods were summarized, and the clinical outcomes and the safety of immediate breast reconstruction were evaluated., Results: One hundred and twenty-three patients were enrolled in this study. Different reconstructive methods were applied according to the clinical stage, the amount of skin removal, the size of contralateral breasts, the physical condition and the preference of the patients. Seventy-nine cases were performed with tissue expander/implant two-stage reconstruction, twenty-three cases received direct breast implant insertion, seven cases were applied for latissimus dorsi (LD) myocutaneous flap transfer combined with implant insertion, five cases were provided transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap transfer, six cases underwent tissue expander/implant combined with endoscopic LD muscle flap transfer, and three cases chose tissue expander/deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap transfer. The average follow-up time was (12.3±9.0) months (3.5-41.0 months). One patient with direct implant insertion had partial blood supply distur-bance of the mastectomy flap. One case had necrosis of distal end of TRAM zone Ⅳ. One patient with expander/DIEP reconstruction had partial fat liquefaction. And two cases had expander leakage at the end of the expansion period. The tumor local recurrence occurred in one patient, and the implant was finally removed. The outcomes were evaluated by Harris method, and 90.2% patients were good or above in shape evaluation. Among the patients with implant based reconstruction, there was no obvious capsular contracture, and most of the implants had good or fair mobility., Conclusion: It is safe and feasible of immediate breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy for appropriate cases. The reconstructive methods can be individualized according to the individual's different conditions. The appropriate reconstructive methods could achieve satisfactory results.

Background: Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) still is largely performed in inpatient settings. This study sought to determine the value (expenditures and complications) of ambulatory MRM., Methods: Health Care Utilization Project (HCUP) state databases from 2016 were queried for patients who underwent MRM. The study examined rates of 30-day readmission for surgical-site infection (SSI) or hematoma, charges by index care setting, and predictors of 30-day readmission., Results: Overall, 8090 patients underwent MRM: 5113 (63 %) inpatient and 2977 (37 %) ambulatory patients. Compared with the patients who underwent inpatient MRM, those who underwent ambulatory MRM were older (61 vs. 59 years), more often white (66 % vs. 57 %), in the lowest income quartile (28 % vs. 21 %), insured by Medicare (43 % vs. 33 %) and residents in a small metro area (6 % vs. 4 %) (all p < 0.01). Of the 5113 patients treated as inpatients, 126 (2.5 %) were readmitted, whereas 50 (1.7 %) of the ambulatory patients were readmitted (p = 0.02). The adjusted charge for inpatient MRM without readmission was $113,878 (range, $107,355-120,402) compared with $94,463 (range, $86,021-102,907) for ambulatory MRM, and the charge for inpatient MRM requiring readmission was $159,355 (range, $147,142-171,568) compared with $139,940 (range, $125,808-154,073) for ambulatory MRM (all p < 0.01). This difference remained significant after adjustment for hospital length of stay. Adjusted logistic regression showed that the ambulatory setting was protective for readmission (odds ratio, 0.49; 95 % confidence interval, 0.35-0.70; p < 0.01)., Conclusions: The analyses suggest that ambulatory MRM is both safe and less expensive. The findings advocate that MRM, a last holdout of inpatient care within breast surgical oncology, can be transitioned to the ambulatory setting for appropriate patients., (© 2023. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Background: Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) is a rare but aggressive subtype of breast cancer accounting for only 1% to 5% of cases but comprising 7% to 10% of breast cancer deaths. Diagnosis of IBC can be challenging which can lead to delays in diagnosis and treatment. We formed a multidisciplinary IBC program to address the unique challenges of diagnosing and treating patients with IBC., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with an IBC CPT code and collected data on the date of the first visit with medical oncology, surgical oncology, or radiation oncology, date of biopsy, and initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In 2020, as part of the IBC program at The Ohio State University, the decision tree (DT) was revised to help identify potential IBC patients. These patients were prioritized with a multidisciplinary appointment within 3 days., Results: After adjusting the call center DT, there was a significant decline in the median and mean time from initial contact to chemotherapy initiation and an insignificant decrease in the mean time from contact to biopsy (P = .71884). The median time of contact to chemotherapy was 10 days (range 9-14) in 2020, a decrease of 43% compared to 3 prior years (P = .0068). After initiation of the IBC program, 100% of patients underwent trimodality therapy-neoadjuvant systemic therapy, modified radical mastectomy, and post mastectomy radiation therapy., Conclusion: A multidisciplinary IBC program that included scheduling DT with specific questions about IBC symptoms helped identify potential patients and significantly decrease time to treatment and assured completion of trimodality therapy., Competing Interests: Disclosure These authors have the following conflict of interest: Park – Bayer, LLC consultant. No conflict of interest: Hussain, Grimes, Stover, Jhawar, Kerger, Agnese, Beyer, Skoracki., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is being increasingly used to treat locally advanced breast cancer and to conserve the breast. In triple-negative breast cancer and HER2-positive breast cancer, a high density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) is an important predictor of NAC response. Thus far, it remains unclear whether the TIL scores in core needle biopsies (CNBs) are closely representative of those in the whole tumor section in resected specimens. This study aimed to evaluate the concordance between the TIL scores of CNBs and resected specimens of breast cancer.Methods: A total of 220 matched pairs of CNBs and resected specimens of breast cancer were included. Stromal TILs were scored on slides stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Clinicopathologic parameters and the agreement of the TIL scores between CNBs and resected specimens were statistically analyzed.Results: The average TIL score was approximately 4.4% higher for the resected specimens than for the CNBs. When the tumors were divided into two groups according to a 60% TIL score cut-off (low and intermediate TIL vs. high TIL), 8.2% showed discordance between the CNB and resected specimen. The overall intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value of the TIL score was 0.895 (95% confidence interval, 0.864-0.920, P < 0.001), and all molecular subtypes showed ICC values over 0.8 (P < 0.001). The ICC values were > 0.9 when ≥ 5 cores were included in the CNBs. Tumors with discordant TILs were characterized by histologic grade III, ER negativity, high proliferative index, and HER2 and triple-negative subtypes. A high proliferative index was an independent risk factor for TIL discordance.Conclusions: The TIL score in CNB specimens is a reliable value that reflects the TIL status of the entire tumor in resected specimens of breast cancer. More than five CNB cores may accurately predict the TIL score of the entire tumor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To compare the efficacy of ultrasound-stellate ganglion block (US-SGB) with that of blind SGB (B-SGB) in the management of breast cancer patients with postoperative neuropathic pain (NP). Methods Forty-eight breast cancer patients with postoperative neuropathic pain were randomly assigned to either US-SGB group (N = 24) or B-SGB group (N = 24). The mean age of US-SGB and B-SGB groups were (51.35 ± 5.63) and (49.54 ± 4.77) years, respectively. Two blockade procedures with 8-day interval were performed on the affected side. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was assessed before treatment, and in the 4th and 8th week after treatment. Results In both groups, VAS scores were significantly decreased after 4 and 8 weeks. The VAS score in US-SGB group was decreased from 5.44 ± 1.52 before treatment to 2.68 ± 1.33 at 4th week and to 1.32 ± 0.85 at 8th week after treatment, while in B-SGB group decreased from 5.36 ± 1.21 before treatment to 3.31 ± 1.27 at 4th week and to 2.09 ± 1.02 at 8th week after treatment. The alleviation of pain in US-SGB group was more significant than that in B-SGB group (4th week: t = 2.251, P = 0.038; 8th week: t = 1.971, P = 0.029). Conclusion Both US-SGB and B-SGB techniques were effective in relieving pain in breast cancer patients with neuropathic pain. However, with postoperative favorable clinical efficacy, US-SGB was better in pain relief in comparison with B-SGB.

Background: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a common postoperative disorder that is frequently observed after general anesthesia, which seriously threatens the quality of patients' life. Existing studies have demonstrated that S-ketamine plays an important role in improving neuroinflammation. This trial aimed to explore the effects of S-ketamine on quality of recovery and cognitive function in patients following modified radical mastectomy (MRM)., Methods: Ninety patients aged 45 to 70 years with ASA grades of I or II, who underwent MRM, were selected. Patients were randomly assigned to the S-ketamine or control group. In the S-ketamine group, patients were induced with S-ketamine instead of sufentanil and maintained with S-ketamine and remifentanil. In the control group, patients were induced with sufentanil and maintained with remifentanil. The primary outcome was the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score. Secondary outcomes including visual analog scale (VAS) score, cumulative propofol and opioids consumption, post anesthesia care unit (PACU) recovery time, occurrence of remedial analgesia, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), other adverse events, as well as patient satisfaction., Results: The global QoR-15 scores at postoperative day 1 (POD1) were significantly higher in the S-ketamine group than in the control group (124 [119.5-128.0] vs. 119 [114.0-123.5], P = 0.002), with a median difference of 5 points (95% confidence interval [CI] [-8 to -2]). Similarly, the global QoR-15 scores at postoperative day 2 (POD2) in the S-ketamine group were significantly higher than in the control group (140.0 [133.0-145.0] vs. 132.0 [126.5-141.5], P = 0.004). In addition, among the five subcomponents of the 15-item scale, S-ketamine group had a higher score in terms of physical comfort, pain, and emotional state both at POD1 and POD2. In terms of MMSE score, S-ketamine could promote the recovery of postoperative cognitive function at POD1, but not at POD2. Furthermore, the consumption of opioids, VAS score, and remedial analgesia in the S-ketamine group decreased significantly., Conclusions: Collectively, our findings support that general anesthesia with S-ketamine as a potential strategy showed high safety and could not only improve the quality of recovery mainly through improving pain, physical comfort, and emotional state but also promote the recovery of cognitive function on POD1 in patients undergoing MRM., Trial Registration: The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration No:ChiCTR2200057226, Date of registration: 04/03/2022)., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Postoperative analgesia in breast surgery is difficult due to the extensive nature of the surgery and the complex innervation of the breast; general anesthesia can be associated with regional anesthesia techniques to control intra- and post-postoperative pain. This randomized comparative study aimed to compare the efficacy of the erector spinae plane block and the thoracic paravertebral block in radical mastectomy procedures with or without axillary emptying., Methods: This prospective randomized comparative study included 82 adult females who were randomly divided into two groups using a computer-generated random number. Both groups, Thoracic Paraverterbal block group and Erector Spinae Plane Block group (41 patients each), received general anesthesia associated with a multilevel single-shot thoracic paravertebral block and a multilevel single-shot erector spinae plane block, respectively. Postoperative pain intensity (expressed as Numeric Rating Scale), patients who needed rescue analgesic, intra- and post-operative opioid consumption, post-operative nausea and vomiting, length of stay, adverse events, chronic pain at 6 months, and the patient's satisfaction were recorded., Results: At 2 h (p < 0.001) and 6 h (p = 0.012) the Numeric Rating Scale was significantly lower in Thoracic Paraverterbal block group. The Numeric Rating Scale at 12, 24, and 36 postoperative hours did not show significant differences. There were no significant differences also in the number of patients requiring rescue doses of NSAIDs, in intra- and post-operative opioid consumption, in post-operative nausea and vomiting episodes and in the length of stay. No failures or complications occurred in the execution of techniques and none of the patients reported any chronic pain at six months from the surgery., Conclusions: Both thoracic paravertebral block and erector spinae plane block can be effectively used in controlling post-mastectomy pain with no significant differences between the two blocks., Trial Registration: The study was prospectively registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (trial identifier NCT04457115) (first registration 27/04/2020)., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the difference between the level of sexual satisfaction in breast cancer patients with Modified Radical Mastectomy (MRM) and Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS)., Methods: This study used a cross-sectional study using a validated Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire. This study was conducted from 2020 until 2021. Data were collected and analyzed using the chi-square test for bivariate variables and logistic regression for multivariate variables., Results: Patients with BCS were more satisfied with their sexual activity than patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy (p = 0.0001, OR 6.25, CI = 2.78 - 14.01). Other factors having effect on sexual satisfactions were: age that showed a statistically effect on sexual satisfaction (patients <55 years were more satisfied than patients ≥55 years ( p = 0.004, OR = 3.23, CI 1.44 - 7.22), the period after operation (<5 years vs >5 years) showed a statistically significant difference in sexual satisfaction ( p = 0.087, OR=0.53, CI = 0.25-1.10), Having chemotherapy treatment showed statistically significant risk for sexual satisfaction (p = 0.003, OR=7.39, CI= 1.62-33.83). Factors having no statistically significant effect on sexual satisfactions were: Radiotherapy treatment (p = 0.133, OR=1.75 and CI = 0.84 -3.64), length of marriage as defined with <10 years and > 10 years (p = 0.616, OR=1.39 and CI = 0.38-5.09), marital status (p = 0.082, OR =0.39, CI=0,13 - 1.16), educational status (p = 0.778, OR = 1.18, CI = 0.37 - 3.75), and work at home vs outside home (p = 0.117, OR=1.8, and CI = 0.86 - 3.78)., Conclusion: BCS as surgical therapy option is the most dominant factor related to sexual satisfaction followed by age group, and chemotherapy group.

Background: Breast cancer is the most prevalent from of cancer among women worldwide and leading cause of death. Breast cancer can be treated surgically, systemically (with hormonal therapy, chemotherapy) or with radiotherapy. Through the years, breast cancers management evolved towards conservation surgery. A surgical remove of partial or complete breast tissue, surrounding tissues, and nearby lymph nodes is called mastectomy. In Modified Radical Mastectomy, there is removal of entire breast tissue and lymph nodes. Treatment of modified radical mastectomy may lead to side effects such as shoulder pain, restricted shoulder mobility and anatomical and biomechanical changes of the shoulder, and also reduce functional disability., Method: Eighty six participants were included in this study. Two groups, each of 43 were made, Group A (control group) was given conventional exercises and Group B (study group) was given scapular strengthening exercises with conventional exercises. Outcome measures - Shoulder Pain And Functional Disability, Shoulder range of motion were assessed both pre and post-test., Result: Group B had lower pain intensity (77.116 ± 5.798vs 82.837 ± 3.860) and functional disability (70.326 ± 5.281 vs 77.791± 5.102) and higher shoulder flexion (167.98 ± 8.230 vs 107.05 ±8.018), abduction (156.91 ± 8.230 vs 107.63 ±8.230) and external rotation (62.372 ± 7.007 vs 41.907 ±6.771) range of motion than Group A., Conclusion: The current study concluded that, scapular strengthening exercises along with conventional treatment proved beneficial and effective rather than only conventional treatment on shoulder dysfunction for pain and functional disability after modified radical mastectomy.

Objectives: Post-operative pain after a modified radical mastectomy ranges from moderate to severe. Pectoralis (PECS) block has been found to be more effective than erector spinae block in reducing pain and the consumption of rescue analgesia in the post-operative period. This study aimed to compare the effect of erector spinae block and PECS block on the quality of recovery after modified radical mastectomy using the quality of recovery (QoR-40) score., Methods: This randomised controlled study was conducted at King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India, from 9 th October 2020 to 9 th October 2021. After general anaesthesia, patients were given blocks according to computer-generated randomisation: Group I: PEC I and PEC II (PECS) blocks; Group II: erector spinae plane (ESP) block; and Group III: control group (no intervention). The QoR-40 score was observed on the morning of the surgery and after 24 hours. Time to rescue analgesia and the total consumption of rescue analgesia in the first 24 hours were also observed., Results: A total of 90 patients were included (30 in each group). In the post-operative period after 24 hours, global QoR-40 scores were 183.64 ± 6.36, 179.68 ± 6.38 and 171.37 ± 6.88 in the PECS, ESP and control groups ( P <0.0001). But there was no statistically significant difference between the QoR scores of PECS and ESP group patients ( P = 0.0551). The total requirement of rescue analgesic was significantly lower in the PECS group (137.28 ± 31.46 mg) than in the ESP (189.46 ± 42.98 mg) and control (229.57 ± 46.80 mg) groups ( P <0.0001). Time to first rescue analgesia was significantly higher in the PECS group (6.53 ± 2.78 hours) than in the ESP (4.05 ± 2.91 hours) and control (2.15 ± 1.51 hours) groups ( P <0.0001)., Conclusion: Both ESP and PECS blocks were effective in improving the QoR score and in reducing the consumption of rescue analgesia after modified radical mastectomy., Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors declare no conflict of interests., (© Copyright 2023, Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, All Rights Reserved.)