Search

Deep brain stimulation has become an established therapeutic choice to manage the symptoms of medically refractory Parkinson's disease. Its efficacy is highly dependent on the accuracy of electrodes' positioning in the correct anatomical target. During DBS procedure, the opening of the dura mater induces the displacement of neural structures. This effect mainly depends on the loss of the physiological negative intracranial pressure, air inflow, and loss of cerebrospinal fluid. Several studies concentrated on correcting surgical techniques for DBS electrodes' positioning in order to reduce pneumocephalus which may result in therapeutic failure. The authors focused in particular on reducing the brain air window and maintaining the pressure gradient between intra- and extracranial compartments. A significant reduction of pneumocephalus and brain shift was obtained by excluding the opening of the subarachnoid space, by covering the dura mater opening with tissue sealant and by reducing the intracranial pressure in general anesthesia. Smaller burr hole diameters were not statistically relevant for reducing air inflow and displacement of anatomical targets. The review of the literature showed that conserving a physiological intra-extracranial pressure gradient plays a fundamental role in avoiding pneumocephalus and consequent displacement of brain structures, which improves surgical accuracy and DBS long-term results.

Drug-resistant epileptic patients account for 40 % of cases of epilepsy. Consequently, specific therapeutic options could be surgical resection or, if not indicated, deep brain stimulation (DBS). The aim of this study is to review data from patients affected by drug-resistant complex partial epilepsy with or without generalization treated by anterior thalamic nucleus (AN) DBS to evaluate the efficacy and potential future applications of this approach as a standard method for palliative seizure control. Six patients affected by drug-resistant complex partial seizures underwent AN DBS from March 2007 to February 2011. The preoperative tests consisted of electroencephalography (EEG), video EEG, morphologic and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), non-acute positron emission tomography (PET), neuropsychological evaluation, Liverpool seizure scale, and Quality Of Life In Epilepsy (QOLIE). These tests and a seizure diary were also administered during a follow-up of at least 3 years. The improvement in terms of decrease of seizures was more than 50 % in patients affected by complex partial seizures strictly related to limbic system origin. The amelioration was unsatisfactory for patients having anatomical lesions outside the limbic structures with evidence of late diffusion in limbic areas. One patient died 40 days after surgery for reasons not concerned with DBS. Although the limited number of enrolled patients limits the reliability of data, the results are in accordance with those found in the recent literature and deserve to be considered for further studies regarding real efficacy, indications, stimulation parameters, side effects, and complications.

Objective Conventional deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems with ring-shaped leads generate spherical electrical fields. In contrast, novel directional leads use segmented electrodes. Aim of this study was to quantify the impedance variations over time in subjects with the directional Cartesia-Boston® system. Methods Impedance records, programming settings, and clinical data of 11 consecutive Parkinsonian patients implanted with DBS directional leads in two Italian centers (Udine and Vicenza) were retrospectively evaluated. Data were collected before starting stimulation (in the operating room and at days 5 and 40) and after switching stimulation on at the successive follow-up visits (1, 6 and 12 months). Results Directional leads have significantly higher impedance than ring leads. Stimulated contacts had always lower impedance compared to non-stimulated contacts. Before DBS-on, all contacts had higher impedance in the operating room, with an initial decrease five days post-surgery and a subsequent increase at day 40, more evident for directional contacts. The impedance of directional leads increased post-implantation at 1 and 6 months with a plateau at 12 months. Conclusions There was a significant difference between the directional and ring leads at baseline (before activation of DBS) and during follow-up (chronic DBS). Significance Our study reveals new information about the impedance of segmented electrodes that is useful for patient management during the initial test period, as well as during long-term DBS follow-up.

The novel Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) directional leads have a 1.5 mm2 surface, compared to the 6 mm2 of standard cylindrical ring leads. The lower contacts surface area physiologically implicates an increment of the impedances values and potential higher fluctuations. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impedances variation overtime in subjects who underwent to DBS surgery with a directional system. Eleven consecutive patients underwent to surgery in bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus (STN) using directional leads. At the activation visit and the subsequent visits, the impedances values were collected up to 12 months. All the patients received the best program set in terms of clinical outcomes. We collect data of more than 160 contacts. A faster impedance increase is detected in early post-operative phase with subsequent decrease over time. 97.5% of therapeutic contacts at 6 months were directional. The fluctuations of the impedances in the active directional contacts appear to be greater than in the cylindrical contacts. The use of a Directional DBS system with constant-current stimulation seems to be a proper tool to maintain the therapeutic stability.

Objective On the basis of recent findings about the pathophysiology of cluster headache and through the experience reported in recent literature, we have reviewed the outcome of four patients affected by drug-resistant cluster headache treated in our department by posterior hypothalamic deep brain stimulation with a follow-up of more than 5 years. Methods Between 2004 and 2006, we selected four patients affected by cluster headache. The diagnosis was based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders II criteria, and all patients were refractory to drug therapy. Under local anesthesia they underwent stereotactic positioning of a stimulation electrode within the posterior hypothalamus, ipsilateral to the site of pain. An intraoperative neurophysiological test stimulation was performed to assess possible side effects and symptoms related to hypothalamic neuronal activity. A second surgery was then performed with the patient under general anesthesia to implant the extension cable and the implantable pulse generator. Results After 5 years of follow up, all patients had a valuable benefit with a reduction in episode frequency from 90% to 50% associated with a decrease in pain intensity perception. Conclusion The long-lasting pain reduction and the improvement in the patients' symptoms should be considered a real positive prospective, not only because there was uncertainty about the persistence of the beneficial effects at a long-term follow-up, but also for the improvement of the quality of life. The stimulation can restore important aspects concerning the psychic condition that very often constitutes an important limiting factor in normal daily life for this type of patient.

Device-related infection is a common occurrence after deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery, and may result in additional interventions and a loss of efficacy of therapy. This retrospective review aimed to evaluate the incidence, severity and management of device-related infections in 212 DBS procedures performed in our institute. Data on 106 patients, in whom 212 DBS procedures were performed between 2001 and 2011 at our institute by a single neurosurgeon (M.P.), were reviewed to assess the incidence, severity, management and clinical characteristics of infections in the first year after the implantation of a DBS system. Infections occurred in 8.5% of patients and 4.2% of procedures. Of the nine infections, eight involved the neurostimulator and extensions, and one the whole system. The infections occurred 30.7 days after implantation: 7 within 30 days and 2 within 6 months. Infected and uninfected patients were comparable in terms of age, sex, indication for DBS implantation and neurostimulator location. In eight cases, the system components involved were removed and re-implanted after 3 months, while in one case the complete hardware was removed and not re-implanted. The overall incidence of postoperative infections after DBS system implantation was 4.2%; this rate decreased over time. All infections required further surgery. Correct and timely management of partial infections may result in successful salvage of part of the system.

The 3-month clinical follow-up showed a significant reduction of UPDRS III score in the group with neurophysiological monitoring (-38%, p