Search

The eleven priority, EPA phenolic pollutants were determined by liquid chromatography followed by two detectors in series; UV and electrochemical. Three different adsorbents, Envi-Carb (a carbon black) and two functionalized polymeric resins, Bond Elut PPL and another synthesized in our laboratory with an ocarboxybenzoyl moiety, were compared for solid-phase extraction (SPE) to detect lower concentrations of the eleven phenolics in natural waters. Higher recoveries were obtained using the functionalized polymeric adsorbents compared with Envi-Carb. When real samples were analysed, the synthetic adsorbent gave lower interference than Bond Elut PPL and phenol was determined at low levels with no humic and fulvic acid inter-ference when Na2SO3 was added. The linearity range for most compounds in tap water was 0.05–20 μg L−1 and the limits of detection were <35 ng L−1. Repeatability and reproducibility between days for real samples spiked at 0.1 μg L−1, expressed as relative standard deviation, were <8% and 10%, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) have been synthesised for the selective extraction of 4-nitrophenol (4-NP) from water samples. One polymer was synthesised via a non-covalent approach and the other via a semi-covalent approach. The selectivity of the polymers for 4-NP was evaluated when these polymers were applied in on-line solid-phase extraction (MISPE) coupled to reversed-phase HPLC. The MISPE conditions for both MIPs were optimised and a clean-up step was included to eliminate non-specific interactions. Differences between the two MIPs were observed with the non-covalent MIP being the more selective of the two, whereas the recoveries were slightly higher for the semi-covalent MIP. The performance of the imprinted polymers in the MISPE of real water samples was also evaluated.

A molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) able to bind 4-nitrophenol (4-NP) was prepared using noncovalent molecular imprinting methods and evaluated as a selective sorbent in molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction (MISPE) on-line coupled to a reversed-phase HPLC. It has been shown that the conditions chosen for washing the MIP and for eluting the analyte in the MISPE process are extremely important for ensuring good selectivity and recovery. River water samples, spiked with the 11 Environmental Protection Agency phenolic compounds at microgram per liter levels, were preconcentrated on-line using this MIP, and 4-NP was selectively extracted. The humic acid interference was simultaneously reduced considerably. The MIP was also compared with a commercially available highly cross-linked polymer (LiChrolut EN) and the former yielded cleaner extracts.