34 results on '"Mason, Kayleigh J."'
Search Results
2. Factors associated with adverse COVID-19 outcomes in patients with psoriasis—insights from a global registry–based study
- Author
-
Shah, Aadarsh, Barea, Alberto, Romero-Maté, Alberto, Singapore, Alekya, Paolino, Alexandra, Mwale, Alice, Morales Callaghan, Ana Maria, Martinez, Ana, DeCrescenzo, Andrew, Pink, Andrew E., Jones, Ann, Sergeant, Ann, Essex, Annette, Bewley, Anthony, Makrygeorgou, Areti, van Huizen, Astrid, Pérez-Suárez, Beatriz, Farida, Benhadou, Claréus, Birgitta Wilson, Prims, Carla Tubau, Davis, Carrie, Quinlan, Catherine, Maybury, Catriona, Cesar, Gonzalez A., Barclay, Charlotte, Greco, Claudio, Brassard, Danielle, Cummings, Deanna, Kolli, Deepti, Descamps, Vincent, Genao, Diana Ruiz, Carras, Efrossini, Hawryluk, Elena, Martínez-García, Eliseo, Klujszo, Elzbieta, Dwyer, Emily, Toni, Emmanuel, Sonkoly, Enikö, Loayza, Enrique, Daudén, Esteban, Valenzuela, Fernando, Popov, Georgi, King, Georgie, Celine, Girard, Aparicio, Gloria, Johnston, Graham A., Cardozo, Gustavo Anibal, Pearson, Ian, Yanguas, Ignacio, Weisman, Jamie, Carolan, Jennifer E., Hughes, Jenny, Ortiz-Salvador, Jose-Maria, Carrascosa, Jose-Manuel, Schwartz, Joseph J., Jackson, Karina, Kerisit, Kathryn G., Wu, Keith, Asfour, Leila, de Graaf, Leontien, Lesort, Cécile, Meuleman, Lieve, Eidsmo, Liv, Skov, Lone, Gribben, Lorraine, Rustin, Malcolm, Velasco, Manel, Panchal, Manisha, Lakhan, Manpreet, Franco, Manuel D., Svensson, Marie-Louise, Vandaele, Mark, Marovt, Maruska, Zargari, Omid, De Caso, Pablo, Varela, Paulo, Jenkin, Peter, Phan, Céline, Hampton, Philip, Goldsmith, Portia, Bak, Rachel, Speeckaert, Reinhart, Romiti, Ricardo, Woolf, Richard, Mercado-Seda, Rogelio, Khatun, Rohima, Ceovic, Romana, Taberner, Rosa, Cohen, Russell W., Stefanescu, Simina, Kirk, Sarah, Reeken, Saskia, Ayob, Shanti, Pérez-Barrio, Silvia, Piaserico, Stefano, Hoey, Susannah, Torres, Tiago, Talme, Toomas, Desai, Trupti V., van Geest, Adrienne J., King, Victoria, Di Lernia, Vito, Koreja, Zahira, Hasab, Vito Zeeshaan, Mahil, Satveer K., Dand, Nick, Mason, Kayleigh J., Yiu, Zenas Z.N., Tsakok, Teresa, Meynell, Freya, Coker, Bola, McAteer, Helen, Moorhead, Lucy, Mackenzie, Teena, Rossi, Maria Teresa, Rivera, Raquel, Mahe, Emmanuel, Carugno, Andrea, Magnano, Michela, Rech, Giulia, Balogh, Esther A., Feldman, Steven R., De La Cruz, Claudia, Choon, Siew Eng, Naldi, Luigi, Lambert, Jo, Spuls, Phyllis, Jullien, Denis, Bachelez, Hervé, McMahon, Devon E., Freeman, Esther E., Gisondi, Paolo, Puig, Luis, Warren, Richard B., Di Meglio, Paola, Langan, Sinéad M., Capon, Francesca, Griffiths, Christopher E.M., Barker, Jonathan N., and Smith, Catherine H.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Weight management with orlistat in type 2 diabetes: an electronic health records study.
- Author
-
Ghosal, Shraboni, Heron, Neil, Mason, Kayleigh J, Bailey, James, and Jordan, Kelvin P
- Subjects
TYPE 2 diabetes ,REDUCING diets ,ELECTRONIC health records ,OPTIMAL stopping (Mathematical statistics) ,WEIGHT loss - Abstract
Background: Orlistat is recommended as an adjunct to diet and exercise for weight loss in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Aim: To explore associations between patient characteristics and orlistat prescribing, and to determine associations of orlistat with weight loss in T2DM and prediabetes. Design and setting: Cohort study using anonymised health records from a UK database of general practice. Method: The UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum database was searched to compile a cohort of patients aged ≥18 years, first diagnosed with T2DM or prediabetes in 2016 or 2017. Once the data had been collated, multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine associations with starting orlistat and stopping it early (<12 weeks of prescriptions) and orlistat's associations with weight loss in those who had not been prescribed second-line antidiabetic medications. Results: Out of 100 552 patients with incident T2DM or prediabetes, 655 (0.8%) patients with T2DM and 128 (0.7%) patients with prediabetes were prescribed orlistat. Younger people, females, those in areas of deprivation, current smokers, those coprescribed metformin, and those recorded as having hypertension were statistically significantly more likely to be prescribed orlistat; higher baseline glycated haemoglobin levels were associated with early stopping. In comparison with patients not on orlistat, those who continued using it for ≥12 weeks were more likely to lose ≥5% weight (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07 to 2.67) but those who stopped orlistat early were less likely to lose ≥5% weight (AOR 0.56, 95% CI = 0.29 to 1.09). Conclusion: Orlistat was significantly associated with weight loss in patients with T2DM and prediabetes when taken for at least 12 weeks; however, it was infrequently prescribed and often taken for <12 weeks. Orlistat may be a useful adjunct to lifestyle modifications for patients with T2DM and prediabetes, but barriers to continued use means it may not be effective for everyone in managing weight loss. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. P045 Google Internet Searches Related to Inflammatory Arthritis: an Observational Study Using Google Trends Data
- Author
-
Akthar, Mumina, primary, Mason, Kayleigh J, additional, and Scott, Ian C, additional
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. HLA-C*06:02 genotype is a predictive biomarker of biologic treatment response in psoriasis
- Author
-
Benham, Marilyn, Hussain, Sagair, Kirby, Brian, Lawson, Linda, McElhone, Kathleen, Ormerod, Anthony, Owen, Caroline, Barnes, Michael R., Di Meglio, Paola, Emsley, Richard, Evans, Andrea, Payne, Katherine, Stocken, Deborah, Dand, Nick, Duckworth, Michael, Baudry, David, Russell, Alice, Curtis, Charles J., Lee, Sang Hyuck, Evans, Ian, Mason, Kayleigh J., Alsharqi, Ali, Becher, Gabrielle, Burden, A. David, Goodwin, Richard G., McKenna, Kevin, Murphy, Ruth, Perera, Gayathri K., Rotarescu, Radu, Wahie, Shyamal, Wright, Andrew, Reynolds, Nick J., Warren, Richard B., Griffiths, Christopher E.M., Smith, Catherine H., Simpson, Michael A., and Barker, Jonathan N.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Pain in Children and Young People between 2005-2021: An Electronic Primary Health Care Record Study
- Author
-
Mason, Kayleigh J., primary, Jordan, Kelvin P., additional, Bailey, James, additional, Protheroe, Joanne, additional, Mughal, Faraz, additional, Thomas, Martin, additional, Jöud, Anna, additional, Jowett, Sue, additional, Snell, Kym I. E., additional, and Dunn, Kate M., additional
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Google Internet searches related to inflammatory arthritis: An observational study using Google Trends data.
- Author
-
Akthar, Mumina, Mason, Kayleigh J., and Scott, Ian C.
- Subjects
- *
DRUG therapy for arthritis , *INTERNET searching , *PAIN measurement , *RESEARCH funding , *HEALTH , *SCIENTIFIC observation , *METHOTREXATE , *INFORMATION resources , *ARTHRITIS , *SEARCH engines , *PAIN , *PAIN management , *INFLAMMATION , *INFORMATION-seeking behavior , *SYMPTOMS - Abstract
Objective: The Internet has transformed how patients access health information. We examined Google search engine data to understand which aspects of health are most often searched for in combination with inflammatory arthritis (IA). Methods: Using Google Trends data (2011–2022) we determined the relative popularity of searches for 'patient symptoms' (pain, fatigue, stiffness, mood, work) and 'treat‐to‐target' (disease‐modifying drugs, steroids, swelling, inflammation) health domains made with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA) in the UK/USA. Google Trends normalises searches by popularity over time and region, generating 0–100 scale relative search volumes (RSV; 100 represents the time‐point with most searches). Up to five search term combinations can be compared. Results: In all IA forms, pain was the most popular patient symptom domain. UK/USA searches for pain gave mean RSVs of 58/79, 34/51, and 39/63 with RA, PsA, and AxSpA; mean UK/USA RSVs for other patient symptom domains ranged 2–7/2–8. Methotrexate was the most popular treat‐to‐target search term with RA/PsA in the UK (mean 28/21) and USA (mean 63/33). For AxSpA, inflammation was most popular (mean UK/USA 9/34). Searches for pain were substantially more popular than searches for methotrexate in RA and PsA, and inflammation in AxSpA. Searches increased over time. Conclusions: Pain is the most popular search term used with IA in Google searches in the UK/USA, supporting surveys/qualitative studies highlighting the importance of improving pain to patients with IA. Routine pain assessments should be embedded within treat‐to‐target strategies to ensure patient perspectives are considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Differential Drug Survival of Second-Line Biologic Therapies in Patients with Psoriasis: Observational Cohort Study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR)
- Author
-
Iskandar, Ireny Y.K., Warren, Richard B., Lunt, Mark, Mason, Kayleigh J., Evans, Ian, McElhone, Kathleen, Smith, Catherine H., Reynolds, Nick J., Ashcroft, Darren M., and Griffiths, Christopher E.M.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Pre-existing musculoskeletal pain and its association with mortality in newly diagnosed co-morbid conditions: an electronic health record cohort study
- Author
-
Marshall, Michelle, primary, Mason, Kayleigh J, additional, Edwards, John J, additional, Mamas, Mamas A, additional, Bailey, James, additional, Heron, Neil, additional, Achana, Felix A, additional, Frisher, Martin, additional, Huntley, Alyson L, additional, Mallen, Christian D, additional, Png, May Ee, additional, Tatton, Stephen, additional, White, Simon, additional, and Jordan, Kelvin P, additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Summarizing Evidence of Associations of COVID‐19 With a Future Diagnosis of Inflammatory Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases: A Rapid Review
- Author
-
Mudge, Hannah R., primary, Honey, Jonathan R., additional, Tachoukaft, Sara, additional, Hider, Samantha L., additional, Mason, Kayleigh J., additional, Welsh, Victoria K., additional, and Burton, Claire, additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Estimating the direct healthcare utilization and cost of musculoskeletal pain among people with comorbidity: a retrospective electronic health record study
- Author
-
Png, May Ee, primary, Mason, Kayleigh J., additional, Marshall, Michelle, additional, Jordan, Kelvin P., additional, Bailey, James, additional, Frisher, Martin, additional, Heron, Neil, additional, Huntley, Alyson L., additional, Mallen, Christian D., additional, Mamas, Mamas A., additional, Tatton, Stephen, additional, White, Simon, additional, Edwards, John J., additional, and Achana, Felix, additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. The association of age at psoriasis onset and HLA-C*06:02 with biologic survival in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a cohort study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR).
- Author
-
Alabas, Oras A, Mason, Kayleigh J, Yiu, Zenas Z N, Warren, Richard B, Dand, Nick, Barker, Jonathan N, Smith, Catherine H, Griffiths, Christopher E M, and group, the BADBIR and BSTOP study
- Subjects
- *
AGE of onset , *OVERALL survival , *IMMUNOMODULATORS , *PSORIASIS , *DERMATOLOGISTS - Abstract
Background Few studies have used real-world data to investigate the association between biologic therapy survival and age at psoriasis onset or HLA-C*06:02 status in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. The robustness of these studies is limited by small sample size, short follow-up and diverse safety and effectiveness measures. Objectives To describe biologic survival and explore whether the response to biologics is modified by age at psoriasis onset or HLA-C*06:02 status in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Methods Data from patients in the UK and the Republic of Ireland registered in the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR) from 2007 to 2022 on a first course of adalimumab, etanercept, secukinumab or ustekinumab with at least 6 months' follow-up and a subset of BADBIR patients with available HLA-C*06:02 information registered to Biomarkers and Stratification To Optimise outcomes in Psoriasis (BSTOP) were analysed. Patients aged ≥ 50 years at treatment initiation were classified into early-onset psoriasis (EOP) (presenting in patients ≤ 40 years of age) and late-onset psoriasis (LOP) (presenting in patients > 40 years of age). BADBIR patients with available information in BSTOP were categorized as HLA-C*06:02− or HLA-C*06:02 +. Biologic survival was defined as treatment discontinuation associated with ineffectiveness or occurrence of adverse events (AEs). Adjusted survival function and hazard ratio (aHR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using a flexible parametric model to compare discontinuing therapy between age at psoriasis onset and HLA-C*06:02 groups. Each model included exposure (biologics), effect modifier (age at onset or HLA-C*06:02 status), interaction terms and several baseline demographic, clinical and disease severity covariates. Results Final analytical cohorts included 4250 patients in the age at psoriasis onset group [2929 EOP (69%) vs. 1321 LOP (31%)] and 3094 patients in the HLA-C*06:02 status group [1603 HLA-C*06:02+ (52%) vs. 1491 HLA-C*06:02− (48%)]. There was no significant difference between EOP and LOP in drug survival associated with ineffectiveness or AEs for any biologics. However, compared with patients who were HLA-C*06:02−, patients who were HLA-C*06:02 + were less likely to discontinue ustekinumab for reasons associated with ineffectiveness (aHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.42–0.75). Conclusions HLA-C*06:02, but not age at psoriasis onset, is a predictive biomarker for biologic survival in patients with psoriasis. Findings from this large cohort provide further, important information to aid clinicians using biologic therapies to manage patients with psoriasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Characteristics of 'super responders' and 'super nonresponders' to first biologic monotherapy for psoriasis: a nested case–control study.
- Author
-
Mason, Kayleigh J, Alabas, Oras A, Dand, Nick, Warren, Richard B, Reynolds, Nick J, Barker, Jonathan N W N, Yiu, Zenas Z N, Smith, Catherine H, Griffiths, Christopher E M, and Group, the BADBIR Study
- Subjects
- *
PSORIASIS , *MYOCARDIAL infarction , *CASE-control method - Abstract
This document is a supplementary information section of a study conducted by the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR). The study aimed to investigate the factors associated with super responders (SRs) and super nonresponders (SNRs) to biologic therapies in patients with psoriasis. The study found that female sex, shorter study follow-up, higher Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), high frequency of adalimumab, lower frequency of ustekinumab at registration, and higher number of comorbidities were associated with SNRs compared with SRs. The study also mentioned that genetic factors, socioeconomic status, lifestyle factors, adherence to medication, immunogenicity, microbiome, epigenetics, and serum drug levels may play a role in determining treatment response. [Extracted from the article]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Pre-existing musculoskeletal pain and its association with mortality in newly diagnosed co-morbid conditions: an electronic health record cohort study.
- Author
-
Marshall, Michelle, Mason, Kayleigh J, Edwards, John J, Mamas, Mamas A, Bailey, James, Heron, Neil, Achana, Felix A, Frisher, Martin, Huntley, Alyson L, Mallen, Christian D, Png, May Ee, Tatton, Stephen, White, Simon, and Jordan, Kelvin P
- Subjects
MUSCULOSKELETAL pain ,MORTALITY ,ELECTRONIC health records - Abstract
Objective Musculoskeletal pain is a common risk factor for co-morbid conditions and might increase the risk of poor outcomes. The objective was to determine whether patients with pre-existing musculoskeletal pain have an increased risk for mortality following a new diagnosis of a co-morbid condition. Methods Patients aged ≥45 years with a new diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), stroke, cancer, dementia or pneumonia recorded in a UK electronic primary care database linked to hospital and mortality records were examined. The association of mortality with musculoskeletal pain (inflammatory conditions, OA and regional pain) was determined. Results The sample size varied from 128 649 (stroke) to 406 289 (cancer) by cohort, with 22–31% having pre-existing musculoskeletal conditions. In the ACS cohort, there was a higher rate of mortality for all musculoskeletal types. There were also higher unadjusted mortality rates in patients with inflammatory arthritis compared with those without musculoskeletal pain in the stroke, cancer and dementia cohorts and for patients with OA in the stroke and cancer cohorts. After adjustment for the number of prescribed medications and age, the increased risk of mortality remained only for patients with inflammatory arthritis in the ACS cohort (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.07; 95% CI 1.03, 1.10). Conclusion Older adults with inflammatory arthritis and OA have increased risk of mortality when they develop a new condition, which seems to be related to the prescription of multiple medicines. Pre-existing musculoskeletal pain is an indicator of a complex patient who is at risk of poorer outcomes at the onset of new illnesses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. P103 The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary care referrals and new diagnoses of inflammatory arthritis
- Author
-
Bajpai, Ram, primary, Burton, Claire, additional, Mason, Kayleigh J, additional, Bailey, James, additional, Jordan, Kelvin P, additional, Mallen, Christian D, additional, and Welsh, Victoria, additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Musculoskeletal pain and its impact on prognosis following acute coronary syndrome or stroke: A linked electronic health record cohort study
- Author
-
Mason, Kayleigh J., primary, Jordan, Kelvin P., additional, Heron, Neil, additional, Edwards, John J., additional, Bailey, James, additional, Achana, Felix A., additional, Chen, Ying, additional, Frisher, Martin, additional, Huntley, Alyson L., additional, Mallen, Christian D., additional, Mamas, Mamas A., additional, Png, May Ee, additional, Tatton, Stephen, additional, White, Simon, additional, and Marshall, Michelle, additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on referrals to musculoskeletal services from primary care and subsequent incidence of inflammatory rheumatic musculoskeletal disease: an observational study
- Author
-
Burton, Claire, primary, Bajpai, Ram, additional, Mason, Kayleigh J, additional, Bailey, James, additional, Jordan, Kelvin P, additional, Mallen, Christian D, additional, and Welsh, Victoria K, additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Trends in consultations and prescribing for rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: an electronic primary care records study.
- Author
-
Welsh, Victoria K, Mason, Kayleigh J, Bailey, James, Bajpai, Ram, Jordan, Kelvin P, Mallen, Christian D, and Burton, Claire
- Subjects
RHEUMATISM ,MUSCULOSKELETAL system diseases ,DRUG prescribing ,PRIMARY care ,COVID-19 pandemic - Abstract
Background: Rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) are common and generally managed in primary care through supported self-care, physiotherapy, analgesia, and specialist referral where indicated. The COVID-19 pandemic led to abrupt changes in primary care delivery, including moves to remote consulting, pauses on group-based self-care, and restricted referrals. Aim: To describe how patterns of UK primary healthcare consultations and analgesic prescribing relating to RMDs changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design and setting: Observational study using routinely collected national primary care electronic health record data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1 April 2017 and 1 October 2021. Method: RMD and analgesic SNOMED-CT codes were derived through consensus and published work. Prevalent and incident RMD-related consultations were determined, and RMD consultations matched to prevalent and incident analgesia prescriptions. Joinpoint regression was used to describe trends over time. Results: Prevalent and incident RMD consultations steadily increased until March 2020 when a substantial drop occurred as pandemic- related restrictions were introduced; levels had not recovered to pre-pandemic highs by October 2021. While incident and prevalent analgesic prescribing also reduced around March 2020, the proportion of patients with an RMD consultation prescribed any analgesic increased from 27.72% in February 2020 to 38.15% in April 2020, with increases across all analgesic groups. A higher proportion of strong opioid prescriptions was seen in the most deprived areas. Conclusion: Pandemic-associated restrictions led to fewer primary care consultations and relative increases in analgesic prescribing, including strong opioids, for RMDs in the UK. Policymakers must consider the impact of these changes in future healthcare resource planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Effectiveness and survival of methotrexate versus adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a cohort study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR).
- Author
-
Alabas, Oras A, Mason, Kayleigh J, Yiu, Zenas Z N, Warren, Richard B, Lunt, Mark, Smith, Catherine H, Griffiths, Christopher E M, and Group, the BADBIR Study
- Subjects
- *
SURVIVAL rate , *IMMUNOMODULATORS , *TERMINATION of treatment , *METHOTREXATE , *PSORIASIS - Abstract
Background Most information on the comparative effectiveness and survival of methotrexate (MTX) and adalimumab (ADA) in the treatment of psoriasis is from randomized control trials and may not translate to the everyday clinical setting. Objectives To determine the real-world effectiveness and survival of MTX and ADA in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis registered in the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR). Methods Eligible patients were registered in BADBIR, ≥ 16 years of age and receiving a first course of MTX or ADA between September 2007 and December 2021, with ≥ 6 months of follow-up. Effectiveness was defined as achieving an absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≤ 2 reported ≥ 13 weeks after the treatment start date until the stop date. The average treatment effect (ATE) was estimated using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity score, including baseline covariates. ATE results were presented as risk ratios (RR). A flexible parametric model was used to estimate adjusted standardized average survival, defined as treatment discontinuation associated with ineffectiveness or the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) at 6, 12 and 24 months. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) at 2 years of treatment exposure was calculated. Results In total, 6575 patients (median age 44 years; 44% female) were analysed; 2659 (40.4%) were prescribed MTX and 3916 (59.5%) ADA. The proportion of patients achieving PASI ≤ 2 was higher in the ADA cohort (77.4%) than in the MTX cohort (37.4%). ADA was more effective than MTX [RR 2.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.98–2.45]. Overall survival associated with ineffectiveness or AEs was lower in the MTX cohort than in the ADA cohort at 6 months [survival estimate 69.7 (95% CI 67.9–71.5) vs. 90.6 (95% CI 89.8–91.4)], 1 year [survival estimate 52.5 (95% CI 50.4–54.8) vs. 80.6 (95% CI 79.5–81.8)] and 2 years [survival estimate 34.8 (95% CI 32.5–37.2) vs. 68.6 (95% CI 67.2–70.0)]. The difference in RMST (years) overall, or when stratified by ineffectiveness and AEs, was 0.53 (95% CI 0.49–0.58), 0.37 (95% CI 0.33–0.42) and 0.29 (95% CI 0.25–0.33), respectively. Conclusions Patients on ADA were twice as likely to be clear or nearly clear of psoriasis and were less likely to discontinue their medication than patients on MTX. Findings from this real-world cohort provide important information to aid clinicians managing patients with psoriasis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. P181 Musculoskeletal pain and prognosis of acute coronary syndrome and cerebrovascular accident: a linked electronic health record cohort study
- Author
-
Mason, Kayleigh J, primary, Jordan, Kelvin P, additional, Achana, Felix A, additional, Bailey, James, additional, Chen, Ying, additional, Frisher, Martin, additional, Huntley, Alyson L, additional, Mallen, Christian D, additional, Mamas, Mamas A, additional, Png, May Ee, additional, Tatton, Stephen, additional, White, Simon, additional, and Edwards, John J, additional
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Vaccine hesitancy and access to psoriasis care during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from a global patient-reported cross-sectional survey
- Author
-
Bechman, Katie, Cook, Emma S., Dand, Nick, Yiu, Zenas Z.N., Tsakok, Teresa, Meynell, Freya, Coker, Bolaji, Vincent, Alexandra, Bachelez, Herve, Barbosa, Ines, Brown, Matthew A., Capon, Francesca, Contreras, Claudia R., De La Cruz, Claudia, Meglio, Paola Di, Gisondi, Paolo, Jullien, Denis, Kelly, Jade, Lambert, Jo, Lancelot, Camille, Langan, Sinead M., Mason, Kayleigh J., McAteer, Helen, Moorhead, Lucy, Naldi, Luigi, Norton, Sam, Puig, Lluís, Spuls, Phyllis I., Torres, Tiago, Urmston, Dominic, Vesty, Amber, Warren, Richard B., Waweru, Hoseah, Weinman, John, Griffiths, Christopher E.M., Barker, Jonathan N., Smith, Catherine H., Galloway, James B., Mahil, Satveer K., PsoProtect study group, [missing], Dermatology, APH - Methodology, AII - Inflammatory diseases, and APH - Quality of Care
- Subjects
RL ,education ,Vaccination ,R735 ,COVID-19 ,Dermatology ,R1 ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,RA0421 ,Medicine and Health Sciences ,Humans ,Psoriasis ,Patient Reported Outcome Measures ,Vaccination Hesitancy ,RA ,Pandemics - Abstract
Background COVID-19 vaccination is efficacious at protecting against severe COVID-19 outcomes in the general population. However, vaccine hesitancy (unwillingness for vaccination despite available vaccination services) threatens public health. Individuals taking immunosuppression for psoriasis have been prioritised for COVID-19 vaccination, however there is a paucity of information on vaccine hesitancy in this population, including contributing factors. While global healthcare has been severely disrupted in the pandemic, the impact on access to psoriasis care and whether this may negatively influence vaccine uptake, is underexplored.Objectives To explore organisational and individual factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in individuals with psoriasis.Methods Individuals with psoriasis, identified through global patient organisations and social media, completed a cross-sectional self-reported online survey. The primary outcome was COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between predictor variables (organisational and individual factors) and outcome.Results Self-reported data from 802 individuals with psoriasis across 89 countries were available (65.6% female, median age 51 years [IQR 37-61], 43.7% taking systemic immunosuppression). Eight percent (n=63) reported vaccine hesitancy. Those reporting vaccine hesitancy were younger, more likely to be of non-white ethnicity, non-UK resident, have a lower BMI, not taking systemic immunosuppression and with shorter disease duration compared to those not reporting vaccine hesitancy. The commonest reasons for vaccine hesitancy were concerns regarding vaccine side-effects, that the vaccine is too new or that psoriasis may worsen post-vaccination. Forty percent (n=322) reported that their psoriasis care had been disrupted by the pandemic. These individuals were younger, of non-white ethnicity, with shorter duration and more severe psoriasis. Disruption to psoriasis care was associated with vaccine hesitancy (unadjusted OR 2.97 (95%CI 1.23-7.13), p=0.015), although not statistically significant in the adjusted model.Conclusion A minority of individuals with psoriasis from our study reported COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Similar to general population trends, vaccine hesitancy in our psoriasis sample is most common in younger age and ethnic minority groups. Our data highlight patient concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccination, which are important to address during patient-clinician interactions to help optimise vaccine uptake and mitigate risks from the ongoing pandemic in individuals with psoriasis.What’s already known about this topic?The COVID-19 vaccine is highly efficacious at protecting against severe COVID-19 outcomes in the general population. Vaccine hesitancy (unwillingness to receive vaccination despite available vaccination services) poses a major threat to global public health and is more common in women, younger age and ethnic minority groups in the general population.Individuals with psoriasis taking systemic immunosuppression were considered at high risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes and prioritised for vaccination, however there is a paucity of information on vaccine hesitancy in this group, including contributing factors.While global healthcare has been severely disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, access to psoriasis care and its potential impact on vaccine hesitancy is underexplored.What does this study add?A substantial proportion (40%) of individuals with psoriasis reported disrupted access to psoriasis care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Disrupted care was most commonly reported in younger age and ethnic minority groups.COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was reported by a minority (8%) of individuals with psoriasis. Those reporting vaccine hesitancy were younger and more likely to be of non-white ethnicity, in keeping with trends in the general population.The commonest reasons for vaccine hesitancy were concerns regarding vaccine side effects, that the vaccine is too new or that psoriasis may worsen post-vaccination. These concerns are important to address during patient-clinician interactions to help mitigate risks from the ongoing pandemic in individuals with psoriasis.Competing Interest StatementNothing to disclose: Dr Bechman, Ms Cook, Dr Dand, Prof. Langan, Dr. Norton, Dr. Tsakok, Dr. Yiu, Dr De La Cruz, Dr. Contreras, Ms. Vesty, Ms. Vincent, Mr. Bola Coker, Ms. Meynell, Dr. Lambert, Prof. Brown, Prof. Naldi. Prof. Barker reports grants and personal fees from Abbvie, grants and personal fees from Novartis, grants and personal fees from Lilly, grants and personal fees from J&J, from null, during the conduct of the study. Prof. Griffiths reports grants and personal fees from AbbVie, grants from Amgen, grants from BMS, grants and personal fees from Janssen, grants from LEO, grants and personal fees from Novartis, grants from Pfizer, grants from Almirall, grants and personal fees from Lilly, grants and personal fees from UCB Pharma, outside the submitted work. Prof. Jullien reports personal fees and non-financial support from Abbvie, personal fees and non-financial support from Novartis, personal fees and non-financial support from Janssen-Cilag, personal fees and non-financial support from Lilly, personal fees and non-financial support from Leo-Pharma, personal fees and non-financial support from MEDAC, personal fees and non-financial support from Celgene, personal fees from Amgen, outside the submitted work. Dr. Capon reports consultancy fees from AnaptysBio, grants from Boheringer-Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Prof. Bachelez reports personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from LEO Pharma, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from UCB, personal fees from Almirall, personal fees from Biocad, personal fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, personal fees from Kyowa Kirin, personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. Prof. Gisondi reports personal fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sandoz, UCB, outside the submitted work. Dr. Galloway reports personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer, grants from Eli Lilly, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from UCB, outside the submitted work. Prof. Weinmann has presented talks for Abbvie, Abbott, Bayer, Chiesi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche and Merck. Dr. Mason reports personal fees from LEO Pharma and Novartis, outside the submitted work. Ms. Moorhead reports personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from Celgene, personal fees from Janssen, personal fees from LEO Pharma, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from UCB, outside the submitted work. Dr. Puig reports grants and personal fees from AbbVie, grants and personal fees from Almirall, grants and personal fees from Amgen, grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, personal fees from Fresenius-Kabi, grants and personal fees from Janssen, grants and personal fees from Lilly, personal fees from Mylan, grants and personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Sandoz, personal fees from Sanofi, personal fees from Samsung-Bioepis, grants and personal fees from UCB, outside the submitted work. Dr. Mahil reports departmental income from Abbvie, Almirall, Eli Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB, outside the submitted work. Dr. Di Meglio reports grants and personal fees from UCB, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Janssen, outside the submitted work. Prof. Warren reports grants and personal fees from Abbvie, grants and personal fees from Celgene, grants and personal fees from Eli Lilly, grants and personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Sanofi, grants and personal fees from UCB|, grants and personal fees from Almirall, grants and personal fees from Amgen, grants and personal fees from Janssen, grants and personal fees from Leo, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, personal fees from Arena, personal fees from Avillion, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Prof. Smith reports grants from Abbvie, Sanofi, Novartis, and Pfizer and through consortia with multiple academic partners (psort.org.uk, BIOMAP-IMI.eu), outside the submitted work. Dr. Torres reports grants and personal fees from AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Biogen, Biocad, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, LEO Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung-Bioepis, Sandoz, during the conduct of the study. Dr. Waweru is on the Board of the International Federation of Psoriasis Associations who have received grants from Abbvie, Almirall, Amgen, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Sun Pharma, Pfizer, and UCB, outside the submitted work. Mr. Urmston reports grants from Almirall, grants from Abbvie, grants from Amgen, grants from Celgene, grants from Dermal Laboratories, grants from Eli Lilly, grants from Janssen, grants from LEO Pharma, grants from T and R Derma, grants from UCB, outside the submitted work. Ms. McAteer reports grants from Abbvie, grants from Almirall, grants from Amgen, grants from Celgene, grants from Dermal Laboratories, grants from Eli Lilly, grants from Janssen, grants from LEO Pharma, grants from UCB, grants from T and R Derma, outside the submitted work. Prof. Spuls has done consultancies in the past for Sanofi 111017 and AbbVie 041217 (unpaid), received a departmental independent research grant for TREAT NL registry LeoPharma December 2019; is involved in performing clinical trials with many pharmaceutical industries that manufacture drugs used for the treatment of diseases such as psoriasis and atopic dermatitis, for which financial compensation is paid to the department/hospital; and is chief investigator of the
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Effectiveness and persistence of acitretin, ciclosporin, fumaric acid esters and methotrexate for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a cohort study from BADBIR.
- Author
-
Alabas, Oras A, Mason, Kayleigh J, Yiu, Zenas Z N, Hampton, Philip J, Reynolds, Nick J, Owen, Caroline M, Bewley, Anthony, Laws, Philip M, Warren, Richard B, Lunt, Mark, Smith, Catherine H, Griffiths, Christopher E M, and Group, BADBIR Study
- Subjects
- *
FUMARATES , *CYCLOSPORINE , *METHOTREXATE , *ESTERS , *PSORIASIS - Abstract
Background Real-world data evaluating effectiveness and persistence of systemic therapies for patients with psoriasis are limited. Objectives To determine the effectiveness and persistence of acitretin, ciclosporin, fumaric acid esters (FAEs) and methotrexate in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Methods Data from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR), a prospective, multicentre pharmacovigilance register of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis receiving biologic and/or conventional systemic therapies, were analysed. Eligible patients were ≥ 16 years of age receiving a first course of acitretin, ciclosporin, FAEs or methotrexate between 2007 and 2021 with ≥ 6 months' follow-up. Effectiveness was defined as achieving absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (aPASI) ≤ 2 reported ≥ 4 weeks after treatment start date until date of cessation. To identify baseline clinical variables associated with treatment effectiveness, we used multivariable logistic regression models estimating the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of achieving aPASI ≤ 2. To describe drug persistence associated with ineffectiveness, occurrence of adverse events or other reasons for discontinuation, survival estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained using a flexible parametric model. Results were obtained using multiple imputed data. Results In total, 5430 patients were included in the analysis. Overall, 1023 (19%) patients were receiving acitretin, 1401 (26%) patients were on ciclosporin, 347 (6%) patients were on FAEs, and 2659 (49%) patients were receiving methotrexate at registration. The proportion of patients who achieved aPASI ≤ 2 was lower for those treated with acitretin [ n = 118 (21%)] compared with those receiving ciclosporin [ n = 233 (34%)], FAEs [ n = 43 (29%)] and methotrexate [ n = 372 (32%)]. Factors associated with ineffectiveness included prior experience to previous nonbiologic systemic therapies (acitretin) (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42–0.96), male sex (methotrexate) (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.46–0.74), comorbidities (aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51–0.97) and alcohol consumption (≤ 14 units per week) (ciclosporin) (aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50–0.98). Persistence associated with all reasons for discontinuation showed better survival for methotrexate compared with acitretin, ciclosporin and FAEs cohorts at 12 months [survival estimate 46.1 (95% CI 44.0–48.3), 31.9 (95% CI 29.4–34.7), 30.0 (95% CI 27.5–32.4) and 35.0 (95% CI 29.9–40.9), respectively]. Conclusions The real-world effectiveness and persistence of acitretin, ciclosporin, FAEs and methotrexate were generally low. Previous nonbiologic systemic therapies, male sex, comorbidities and alcohol consumption were risk factors associated with treatment ineffectiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Nonadherence to systemic immune-modifying therapy in people with psoriasis during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from a global cross-sectional survey.
- Author
-
Quirke-McFarlane, Sophia, Weinman, John, Cook, Emma S, Yiu, Zenas Z N, Dand, Nick, Langan, Sinead M, Bechman, Katie, Tsakok, Teresa, Mason, Kayleigh J, McAteer, Helen, Meynell, Freya, Coker, Bolaji, Vincent, Alexandra, Urmston, Dominic, Vesty, Amber, Kelly, Jade, Lancelot, Camille, Moorhead, Lucy, Barbosa, Ines A, and Bachelez, Herve
- Subjects
COVID-19 pandemic ,MENTAL illness ,PSYCHONEUROIMMUNOLOGY ,PSORIASIS ,ASSOCIATION of ideas ,MENTAL health - Abstract
Background Nonadherence to immune-modifying therapy is a complex behaviour which, before the COVID-19 pandemic, was shown to be associated with mental health disorders in people with immune-mediated diseases. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a rise in the global prevalence of anxiety and depression, and limited data exist on the association between mental health and nonadherence to immune-modifying therapy during the pandemic. Objectives To assess the extent of and reasons underlying nonadherence to systemic immune-modifying therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic in individuals with psoriasis, and the association between mental health and nonadherence. Methods Online self-report surveys (PsoProtect Me), including validated screens for anxiety and depression, were completed globally during the first year of the pandemic. We assessed the association between anxiety or depression and nonadherence to systemic immune-modifying therapy using binomial logistic regression, adjusting for potential cofounders (age, sex, ethnicity, comorbidity) and country of residence. Results Of 3980 participants from 77 countries, 1611 (40.5%) were prescribed a systemic immune-modifying therapy. Of these, 408 (25.3%) reported nonadherence during the pandemic, most commonly due to concerns about their immunity. In the unadjusted model, a positive anxiety screen was associated with nonadherence to systemic immune-modifying therapy [odds ratio (OR) 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07–1.76]. Specifically, anxiety was associated with nonadherence to targeted therapy (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.01–1.96) but not standard systemic therapy (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.81–1.67). In the adjusted model, although the directions of the effects remained, anxiety was not significantly associated with nonadherence to overall systemic (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.92–1.56) or targeted (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.94–1.89) immune-modifying therapy. A positive depression screen was not strongly associated with nonadherence to systemic immune-modifying therapy in the unadjusted (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.94–1.57) or adjusted models (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.87–1.49). Conclusions These data indicate substantial nonadherence to immune-modifying therapy in people with psoriasis during the pandemic, with attenuation of the association with mental health after adjusting for confounders. Future research in larger populations should further explore pandemic-specific drivers of treatment nonadherence. Clear communication of the reassuring findings from population-based research regarding immune-modifying therapy-associated adverse COVID-19 risks to people with psoriasis is essential, to optimize adherence and disease outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Randomized Trial Replication Using Observational Data for Comparative Effectiveness of Secukinumab and Ustekinumab in Psoriasis
- Author
-
Yiu, Zenas Z. N., Mason, Kayleigh J., Hampton, Philip J., Reynolds, Nick J., Smith, Catherine H., Lunt, Mark, Griffiths, Christopher E. M., and Warren, Richard B.
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Comparative Effectiveness Research ,Research ,Middle Aged ,Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized ,Severity of Illness Index ,Featured ,Treatment Outcome ,Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic ,Online First ,Humans ,Psoriasis ,Female ,Ustekinumab ,skin and connective tissue diseases ,Comments ,Original Investigation ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
This comparative effectiveness research study examines observational data from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register and compares them with clinical trial data to determine the effectiveness of 2 psoriasis medications., Key Points Question What is the effectiveness of secukinumab compared with ustekinumab for the treatment of psoriasis in an everyday clinical setting? Findings In this comparative effectiveness research study of 1231 patients receiving either secukinumab or ustekinumab for psoriasis, both drugs had lower treatment effectiveness in a real-world clinical setting than in a trial setting. Secukinumab had superior effectiveness compared with ustekinumab, and the estimate of this relative effect using observational data met regulatory and estimate agreement with trial data. Meaning Results of this study found a gap between the efficacy of biologic therapies in an idealized trial setting and the effectiveness of biologic therapies in the real-world clinical setting in the treatment of psoriasis; however, a target trial emulation approach can provide robust estimates of relative effectiveness that can be used for clinical and regulatory decision-making., Importance Treatments for psoriasis may be less effective in everyday practice than in clinical trials. Emulating a target trial using data from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR) can provide treatment effect estimates that are robust and can inform both clinicians and regulatory bodies. Objectives To assess the comparative effectiveness of ustekinumab and secukinumab in patients with psoriasis, and to test whether the relative effectiveness estimate of the CLEAR trial, a randomized clinical trial that compared secukinumab with ustekinumab for psoriasis, can be replicated. Design, Setting, and Participants This comparative effectiveness research study used a target trial emulation approach and was performed between November 2007 and August 2019. Data were obtained from BADBIR, a multicenter longitudinal pharmacovigilance register of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. Participants had chronic plaque psoriasis, were 18 years or older, and had at least 1 record of a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) of 12 or higher before their initiation to secukinumab or ustekinumab. Propensity score (PS) 1:1 matched analysis and inverse probability treatment weighted analysis were performed. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were the risk ratio (RR) and the risk difference (RD) for achieving PASI of 2 or lower after 12 months of therapy for secukinumab compared with ustekinumab. Methods to account for missing outcome data were complete case analysis, nonresponder imputation, last observation carried forward, inverse probability of censoring weighting, and multiple imputation. Regulatory and estimate agreement metrics were used to benchmark the effect estimates in this study against those in the CLEAR trial. Results A total of 1231 patients were included in the analysis, with 917 receiving ustekinumab and 314 receiving secukinumab. Secukinumab was superior to ustekinumab in all analyses, except under the nonresponder imputation method, in the proportion of participants achieving a PASI of 2 or lower (PS-weighted complete case analysis: RR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.06-1.55]; RD, 11.9% [1.6-22.1]). All analyses, except for nonresponder imputation, reached regulatory agreement in both PS-matching and PS-weighted analyses. Conclusions and Relevance This comparative effectiveness study found that secukinumab resulted in more patients achieving a PASI of 2 or lower after 12 months of therapy compared with ustekinumab in patients with psoriasis. Target trial emulation in this study resulted in regulatory and estimate agreement with the CLEAR randomized clinical trial; further such studies may help fill the evidence gap when comparing other systemic therapies for psoriasis.
- Published
- 2020
25. Describing the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic in people with psoriasis : findings from a global cross-sectional study
- Author
-
Mahil, S. K., Yates, Mark, Yiu, Z. Z.N., Langan, S. M., Tsakok, T., Dand, N., Mason, Kayleigh J., McAteer, H., Meynell, F., Coker, B., Vincent, A., Urmston, D., Vesty, A., Kelly, J., Lancelot, C., Moorhead, L., Bachelez, H., Capon, F., Contreras, C. R., De La Cruz, C., Di Meglio, P., Gisondi, P., Jullien, D., Lambert, J., Naldi, L., Norton, S., Puig, L., Spuls, P., Torres, T., Warren, R. B., Waweru, H., Weinman, J., Brown, M. A., Galloway, J. B., Griffiths, C. M., Barker, J. N., Smith, C. H., other, and, Mahil, S. K., Yates, Mark, Yiu, Z. Z.N., Langan, S. M., Tsakok, T., Dand, N., Mason, Kayleigh J., McAteer, H., Meynell, F., Coker, B., Vincent, A., Urmston, D., Vesty, A., Kelly, J., Lancelot, C., Moorhead, L., Bachelez, H., Capon, F., Contreras, C. R., De La Cruz, C., Di Meglio, P., Gisondi, P., Jullien, D., Lambert, J., Naldi, L., Norton, S., Puig, L., Spuls, P., Torres, T., Warren, R. B., Waweru, H., Weinman, J., Brown, M. A., Galloway, J. B., Griffiths, C. M., Barker, J. N., Smith, C. H., and other, and
- Published
- 2021
26. Factors associated with adverse COVID-19 outcomes in patients with psoriasis—insights from a global registry–based study
- Author
-
Mahil, Satveer K., primary, Dand, Nick, additional, Mason, Kayleigh J., additional, Yiu, Zenas Z.N., additional, Tsakok, Teresa, additional, Meynell, Freya, additional, Coker, Bola, additional, McAteer, Helen, additional, Moorhead, Lucy, additional, Mackenzie, Teena, additional, Rossi, Maria Teresa, additional, Rivera, Raquel, additional, Mahe, Emmanuel, additional, Carugno, Andrea, additional, Magnano, Michela, additional, Rech, Giulia, additional, Balogh, Esther A., additional, Feldman, Steven R., additional, De La Cruz, Claudia, additional, Choon, Siew Eng, additional, Naldi, Luigi, additional, Lambert, Jo, additional, Spuls, Phyllis, additional, Jullien, Denis, additional, Bachelez, Hervé, additional, McMahon, Devon E., additional, Freeman, Esther E., additional, Gisondi, Paolo, additional, Puig, Luis, additional, Warren, Richard B., additional, Di Meglio, Paola, additional, Langan, Sinéad M., additional, Capon, Francesca, additional, Griffiths, Christopher E.M., additional, Barker, Jonathan N., additional, Smith, Catherine H., additional, Shah, Aadarsh, additional, Barea, Alberto, additional, Romero-Maté, Alberto, additional, Singapore, Alekya, additional, Paolino, Alexandra, additional, Mwale, Alice, additional, Morales Callaghan, Ana Maria, additional, Martinez, Ana, additional, DeCrescenzo, Andrew, additional, Pink, Andrew E., additional, Jones, Ann, additional, Sergeant, Ann, additional, Essex, Annette, additional, Bewley, Anthony, additional, Makrygeorgou, Areti, additional, van Huizen, Astrid, additional, Pérez-Suárez, Beatriz, additional, Farida, Benhadou, additional, Claréus, Birgitta Wilson, additional, Prims, Carla Tubau, additional, Davis, Carrie, additional, Quinlan, Catherine, additional, Maybury, Catriona, additional, Cesar, Gonzalez A., additional, Barclay, Charlotte, additional, Greco, Claudio, additional, Brassard, Danielle, additional, Cummings, Deanna, additional, Kolli, Deepti, additional, Descamps, Vincent, additional, Genao, Diana Ruiz, additional, Carras, Efrossini, additional, Hawryluk, Elena, additional, Martínez-García, Eliseo, additional, Klujszo, Elzbieta, additional, Dwyer, Emily, additional, Toni, Emmanuel, additional, Sonkoly, Enikö, additional, Loayza, Enrique, additional, Daudén, Esteban, additional, Valenzuela, Fernando, additional, Popov, Georgi, additional, King, Georgie, additional, Celine, Girard, additional, Aparicio, Gloria, additional, Johnston, Graham A., additional, Cardozo, Gustavo Anibal, additional, Pearson, Ian, additional, Yanguas, Ignacio, additional, Weisman, Jamie, additional, Carolan, Jennifer E., additional, Hughes, Jenny, additional, Ortiz-Salvador, Jose-Maria, additional, Carrascosa, Jose-Manuel, additional, Schwartz, Joseph J., additional, Jackson, Karina, additional, Kerisit, Kathryn G., additional, Wu, Keith, additional, Asfour, Leila, additional, de Graaf, Leontien, additional, Lesort, Cécile, additional, Meuleman, Lieve, additional, Eidsmo, Liv, additional, Skov, Lone, additional, Gribben, Lorraine, additional, Rustin, Malcolm, additional, Velasco, Manel, additional, Panchal, Manisha, additional, Lakhan, Manpreet, additional, Franco, Manuel D., additional, Svensson, Marie-Louise, additional, Vandaele, Mark, additional, Marovt, Maruska, additional, Zargari, Omid, additional, De Caso, Pablo, additional, Varela, Paulo, additional, Jenkin, Peter, additional, Phan, Céline, additional, Hampton, Philip, additional, Goldsmith, Portia, additional, Bak, Rachel, additional, Speeckaert, Reinhart, additional, Romiti, Ricardo, additional, Woolf, Richard, additional, Mercado-Seda, Rogelio, additional, Khatun, Rohima, additional, Ceovic, Romana, additional, Taberner, Rosa, additional, Cohen, Russell W., additional, Stefanescu, Simina, additional, Kirk, Sarah, additional, Reeken, Saskia, additional, Ayob, Shanti, additional, Pérez-Barrio, Silvia, additional, Piaserico, Stefano, additional, Hoey, Susannah, additional, Torres, Tiago, additional, Talme, Toomas, additional, Desai, Trupti V., additional, van Geest, Adrienne J., additional, King, Victoria, additional, Di Lernia, Vito, additional, Koreja, Zahira, additional, and Hasab, Vito Zeeshaan, additional
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Melanoma Risk in Patients Treated With Biologic Therapy for Common Inflammatory Diseases
- Author
-
Esse, Shamarke, primary, Mason, Kayleigh J., additional, Green, Adele C., additional, and Warren, Richard B., additional
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. HLA-C*06:02 genotype is a predictive biomarker of biologic treatment response in psoriasis
- Author
-
Dand, Nick, primary, Duckworth, Michael, additional, Baudry, David, additional, Russell, Alice, additional, Curtis, Charles J., additional, Lee, Sang Hyuck, additional, Evans, Ian, additional, Mason, Kayleigh J., additional, Alsharqi, Ali, additional, Becher, Gabrielle, additional, Burden, A. David, additional, Goodwin, Richard G., additional, McKenna, Kevin, additional, Murphy, Ruth, additional, Perera, Gayathri K., additional, Rotarescu, Radu, additional, Wahie, Shyamal, additional, Wright, Andrew, additional, Reynolds, Nick J., additional, Warren, Richard B., additional, Griffiths, Christopher E.M., additional, Smith, Catherine H., additional, Simpson, Michael A., additional, Barker, Jonathan N., additional, Benham, Marilyn, additional, Hussain, Sagair, additional, Kirby, Brian, additional, Lawson, Linda, additional, McElhone, Kathleen, additional, Ormerod, Anthony, additional, Owen, Caroline, additional, Barnes, Michael R., additional, Di Meglio, Paola, additional, Emsley, Richard, additional, Evans, Andrea, additional, Payne, Katherine, additional, and Stocken, Deborah, additional
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Randomized Trial Replication Using Observational Data for Comparative Effectiveness of Secukinumab and Ustekinumab in Psoriasis: A Study From the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register.
- Author
-
Yiu, Zenas Z. N., Mason, Kayleigh J., Hampton, Philip J., Reynolds, Nick J., Smith, Catherine H., Lunt, Mark, Griffiths, Christopher E. M., Warren, Richard B., and BADBIR Study Group
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Psychosocial factors partially mediate the relationship between mechanical hyperalgesia and self-reported pain
- Author
-
Mason, Kayleigh J., primary, O’Neill, Terence W., additional, Lunt, Mark, additional, Jones, Anthony K.P., additional, and McBeth, John, additional
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Comparison of Drug Discontinuation, Effectiveness, and Safety Between Clinical Trial Eligible and Ineligible Patients in BADBIR.
- Author
-
Mason, Kayleigh J., Barker, Jonathan N. W. N., Smith, Catherine H., Hampton, Philip J., Lunt, Mark, McElhone, Kathleen, Warren, Richard B., Yiu, Zenas Z. N., Griffiths, Christopher E. M., Burden, A. David, and BADBIR Study Group
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Persistence with second-line biologic therapies in patients with psoriasis
- Author
-
Ireny Iskandar, Richard Warren, Mark Lunt, Mason, Kayleigh J., Ian Evans, Kathleen Mcelhone, Smith, Catherine H., Reynolds, Nick J., Christopher Griffiths, and Darren Ashcroft
33. Mechanical pain threshold predicts response to intra-articular steroid therapy in symptomatic knee Osteoarthritis
- Author
-
Mason, Kayleigh J., Mark Lunt, David Felson, Nasimah Maricar, Laura Forsythe, Anthony Jones, John McBeth, and Neill, Terence W. O.
34. Age and biologic survival in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: A cohort study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR).
- Author
-
Alabas OA, Mason KJ, Yiu ZZN, Smith CH, Warren RB, and Griffiths CEM
- Abstract
Background: The current management of psoriasis does not differentiate between young and old patients in selecting the safest and/or most effective biologic., Objectives: To explore the effect of age at treatment initiation in response to biologics in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the UK and Eire., Methods: Data from patients registering to the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR) from 2007-2024 on first course of Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF), interleukin (IL) 12/13, IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors (i) with at least 6 months' follow-up were included. Patients aged ≥16 years at registration were grouped into 16-24, 25-34, 35-44, 45-54, 55-64, 65-74, and ≥75 year cohorts with 45-54 years as the Reference Cohort. Biologic survival was defined as the time between treatment initiation to its discontinuation associated with ineffectiveness or occurrence of adverse events (AEs). Adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was estimated using a flexible parametric model to compare discontinuing therapy between age groups. Each model included exposure (biologic class), effect modifier (age groups), interaction terms, baseline demographic, clinical, and disease severity covariates., Results: There were 14,294 patients included; 847 (6%) 16-24; 2,502 (18%) 25-34; 3,575 (25%) 35-44; 3,863 (27%) 45-54; 2,338 (16%) 55-64; 954 (7%) 65-74; and 215 (2%) ≥75 years. The interaction effects model showed individuals aged 16-24 years were more likely to discontinue TNFi due to ineffectiveness compared with the Reference Cohort (45-54 years) [aHR (95% CI) 1.30 (1.10, 1.55)]. For survival associated with AEs, individuals aged 55-64 years were at higher risk of discontinuing TNFi and IL12/23i [1.33 (1.13, 1.56) and 1.34 (1.03, 1.75), respectively], those aged 65-74 years were more likely to discontinue TNFi, IL-12/23i and IL-17i [1.89 (1.54, 2.31), 2.00 (1.47, 2.73) and 1.69 (1.08, 2.64), respectively] whereas individuals aged ≥75 years were at higher risk of discontinuing the four biologic classes., Conclusions: Psoriasis patients aged 16-24 years are more likely to stop TNFi due to ineffectiveness whereas those aged ≥55 years are more likely to stop biologics due to AEs. These large real-world findings provide important information for clinicians treating people with moderate-to-severe psoriasis across all age groups., (© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.