Search

Even if immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the landscape of cancer therapy, their use may be complicated by immune-related adverse events. Among these, myocarditis is the most severe complication. The clinical suspicion often arises after clinical symptoms onset and increase in cardiac biomarkers or electrocardiographic manifestations. Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are recommended for each patient. However, since they may be misleadingly normal, endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard for establishing the diagnosis. Until now, treatment has been based on glucocorticoids even if increasing interest has risen in other immunosuppressive agents. Although myocarditis currently imposes immunotherapy discontinuation, case reports have suggested a safety rechallenge in low-grade myocarditis paving the way for further studies to respond to this unmet clinical need.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical course and outcomes of all heart transplant recipients affected by coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) who were followed at the leading heart transplant centers of Northern Italy. Background: The worldwide severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has created unprecedented challenges for public health, demanding exceptional efforts for the successful management and treatment of affected patients. Heart transplant patients represent a unique cohort of chronically immunosuppressed subjects in which SARS-CoV-2 may stimulate an unpredictable clinical course of infection. Methods: Since February 2020, we enrolled all 47 cases (79% male) in a first cohort of patients, with a mean age of 61.8 ± 14.5 years, who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, out of 2,676 heart transplant recipients alive before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic at 7 heart transplant centers in Northern Italy. Results: To date, 38 patients required hospitalization while 9 remained self-home quarantined and 14 died. Compared to the general population, prevalence (18 vs. 7 cases per 1,000) and related case fatality rate (29.7% vs. 15.4%) in heart transplant recipients were doubled. Univariable analysis showed older age (p = 0.002), diabetes mellitus (p = 0.040), extracardiac arteriopathy (p = 0.040), previous PCI (p = 0.040), CAV score (p = 0.039), lower GFR (p = 0.004), and higher NYHA functional classes (p = 0.023) were all significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. During the follow-up two patients died and a third patient has prolonged viral-shedding alternating positive and negative swabs. Since July 1st, 2020, we had 6 new patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, 5 patients asymptomatic were self-quarantined, while 1 is still hospitalized for pneumonia. A standard therapy was maintained for all, except for the hospitalized patient. Conclusions: The prevalence and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 should spur cl

Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is frequently found in patients with heart failure (HF). Among several pharmacological agents reported to improve endothelial function, levosimendan seems to be a promising one, even though, to date, only two previously published studies have evaluated its effects on ED in these patients. The aim of our pilot study was to further investigate the role of periodic levosimendan infusion on endothelial function in patients affected by advanced HF. In this cross-sectional study, three different groups were enrolled: 20 patients with advanced HF treated with periodic levosimendan (LEVO), 20 patients with HF on optimal medical therapy (OMT), and 20 healthy subjects (control group). ED was evaluated through flow-mediated dilation (FMD) at the level of the brachial artery. The three groups presented similar ages with significant differences in gender distribution, systolic blood pressure, and chronic kidney disease (eGFR < 30 mL/min). In HF patients, ischaemic aetiology was more prevalent in the LEVO group than in the OMT group (60 vs. 40%, p < 0.001). The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class was worse in the LEVO group, as well as in NT-proBNP (5636.7 ± 6164.6 ng/dL and 1243.7 ± 1487.2 ng/dL, in the LEVO and OMT groups, respectively, p = 0.005). The FMD was significantly higher in the healthy control group compared to that of the OMT group (15.7 ± 6.4 vs. 9.1 ± 6.0%, p = 0.007) while it showed an intermediate value in LEVO patients (12.4 ± 7.1%) (ANOVA p = 0.010). In conclusion, levosimendan therapy seems to ameliorate endothelial dysfunction related to heart failure. Longitudinal studies in patients on periodic therapy are needed in order to confirm the long-term effects of levosimendan on ED.

Background: Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) outbreaks are described in solid organ transplant recipients. Few reports suggest interhuman transmission with important infection control implications. We described a large PJP outbreak in heart transplant (HTx) recipients. Methods: Six cases of PJP occurred in HTx recipients within 10 months in our hospital. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes were described. To identify contacts among individuals a review of all dates of out-patient visits and patient hospitalizations was performed. Cross exposure was also investigated using genotyping on PJ isolates. Results: At the time of PJP-related hospitalization, patients' mean age was 49 ± standard deviation 4 years, median time from HTx was 8 (25%-75% interquartile range [Q1-Q3] 5-12) months and none of the cases were on prophylaxis. At PJP-related admission, 5 patients had CMV reactivation, of whom 4 were on antiviral preemptive treatment. Median in-hospital stay was 30 (Q1-Q3, 28-48) days; and 2 cases required intensive care unit admission. All patients survived beyond 2 years. Transmission map analysis suggested interhuman transmission in all cases (presumed incubation period, median 90 [Q1-Q3, 64-91] days). Genotyping was performed in 4 cases, demonstrating the same PJ strain in 3 cases. Conclusions: We described a large PJP cluster among HTx recipients, supporting the nosocomial acquisition of PJP through interhuman transmission. Based on this experience, extended prophylaxis for more than 6 months after HTx could be considered in specific settings. Further work is required to understand its optimal duration and timing based on individual risk factor profiles and to define standardized countermeasures to prevent and limit PJP outbreaks.

Background Pregnancy after heart transplantation (HTx) may expose the recipient to hemodynamic and immunologic risks and the newborn to toxic effects of immunosuppressive therapy. Adequate preconception counseling is crucial to identify optimal timing and to modify immunosuppressive therapy to minimize risks for both the mother and the fetus. Methods We describe our experience with 12 pregnancies occurred in 11 women who had undergone HTx at our center. Results Pregnancies ran without severe complications or rejections, and none of the babies have shown major defects at birth. However, as reported in the literature, weight at birth rated in lower range in most of the newborns, probably due to in utero cyclosporine exposure. Up to now, none of the babies showed clinical signs of heart disease, although more than half of the mothers had an inherited or familial cardiomyopathy. Conclusions Despite potential mother and fetal complications, successful pregnancy and delivery are possible after HTx, provided that optimum timing, close monitoring, and therapy adjustments are guaranteed. Becoming a mother appears to be an important achievement for young women after HTx, even when there is a risk to transmit an inheritable heart disease.

Introduction: Endothelial dysfunction (ED) of peripheral arteries in chronic heart failure (CHF) subjects has been demonstrated. We assessed endothelial function in subjects undergoing unconventional treatments for CHF, namely heart transplantation (HTX), continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation (LVAD), and repeated levosimendan infusions (r-LEVO). Methods: Twenty HTX recipients (median time from HTX 21 months), 20 patients supported with LVAD (median time from implant 39 months), and 20 patients receiving monthly Levosimendan infusions (median time on treatment 28 months) were enrolled and compared to a group of 20 healthy subjects. ED was evaluated with ultrasound assessment of the diameter before and after ischemic stress at the brachial artery level. The difference between the two diameters normalized for the baseline value (flow mediated dilation–FMD) has been used for the analysis. All the patients were stable at the time of FMD assessment, with those on r-LEVO being evaluated prior to infusion. Results: FMD was significantly lower in HTX and LVAD groups with respect to controls (9.8 ± 7.4, 9.3 ± 5.7, and 15.6 ± 6.4% respectively, p = 0.01), but not in r-LEVO group (12.5 ± 6.9%). When patients were analysed according to time from the operation or on treatment, (< versus ≥ of the median value), no differences were seen in HTX and r-LEVO group, while in LVAD group FMD was borderline significantly higher in patients with longer follow-up (8.4 ± 6.4% versus 10.2 ± 5.2%, p = 0.05). Conclusions: Based on this preliminary data we can inference the following: 1- FMD is abnormal in HTX recipients, despite their good functional status, probably due to factors unrelated to CHF (e.g. hypertension, renal insufficiency, denervation, and drug effects); 2- LVAD patients also show ED, with possible better adaptation in very long-term survivors; 3- Near-normal FMD values in CHF patients who remain stable with r-LEVO suggest that pulsed treatment may obtain