Search

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects on the dose distribution and beam delivery time in spot scanning proton beam therapy (PBT) incorporating the spot deletion technique. A spot scanning plan was created for 30 patients with prostate cancer. The plan was then modified via two processes: Spots with lower weighting depositions were deleted (process A) and spots that were distant from the clinical target volume (CTV) were deleted (process B). The dose distribution to the organs at risk (OAR), the expanded CTV (exCTV), which was defined by a uniform expansion of the CTV by a radius of 5 mm, and the beam delivery time were compared among initial and modified plans. The V50 Gy [relative biological effectiveness (RBE)] to the rectum and bladder, and V60 Gy(RBE) to the urethral bulb, inhomogeneity index (INH) of the exCTV showed a difference (P=1.1x10-14, P=6.4x10-14, P=2.7x10-7, P=3.2x10-17), although only changes by process B were significant. Modified plan by process B showed the V50 Gy(RBE) to the rectum and bladder decreased by -2.4±1.6 and -2.3±1.4%, and the V60 Gy (RBE) to the urethral bulb decreased by -15.9±19.4%. The INH of the exCTV increased by 0.05±0.03%. On the other hand, modification of the initial plan by process A did not affect the dose of the OAR, exCTV or beam delivery time. In spot scanning PBT, modification of the initial radiotherapy plan by systemic deletion of spots distant from the CTV could result in a dose reduction to the OAR.

The present study simulated the effect of spot-scanning proton beam therapy (PBT) performed using a device equipped with a multi-leaf collimator (MLC) to calculate the dose distribution. Simulation studies using 18 pediatric patients with brain tumors in the posterior fossa were performed. Treatment plans were created for the MLC at different stages: Fully open (initial plan), fully closed to allow an irradiated area extending to 15 mm from the clinical target volume (CTV) (15-mm plan), or closing only the leaves where an organ at risk (OAR) overlapped with a border at 10 or 5 mm from the CTV (10- and 5-mm plans, respectively). The mean dose values for the brainstem, cervical cord, brain and cochlea in all MLC closure plans decreased as the MLC was closed (P=9.9×10-10, P=1.3×10-17, P=2.1×10-16 and P=2.0×10-5, respectively). The maximum dose (Dmax) values of the cervical cord and cochlea in all MLC closure plans were also decreased as the MLC was closed (P=3.0×10-4 and P=1.1×10-5, respectively). The dose to the CTV was almost unchanged. In 10 patients, the Dmax of the brain in all MLC-closure plans was higher than that of the initial plan, but the maximum increase was only 0.8 gray relative biological effectiveness [Gy(RBE)]. In conclusion, the existing MLC installed in the treatment device can be used to decrease the OAR dose significantly using spot-scanning PBT without a large capital investment. The dose from the scattered particles was small.

Purpose This retrospective study aimed to determine the clinical outcomes following particle monotherapy (ie, proton therapy [PT] or carbon ion therapy [CIT]) in patients with sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma at a single institution. Methods and Materials Between August 2001 and March 2012, 59 patients were treated with definitive PT or CIT; none underwent chemotherapy or surgery. Of the patients, 22 (37%) had unresectable disease. PT was used in 38 patients (64%); CIT, 21 patients (36%). Almost half of the patients (n = 29, 47%) received 65.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 26 fractions. Results The median follow-up period was 30 months (range, 8-127 months) for all patients and 65 months (range, 9-127 months) for the survivors. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 56.2% and 41.6%, respectively; progression-free survival rates, 42.9% and 34.7%, respectively; and local control rates, 54.0% and 50.4%, respectively. Late toxicities of grade ≥3 occurred in 13 patients (22%). Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the largest retrospective study of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma treated with particle therapy alone. The efficacy of PT and CIT indicated that particle therapy can serve an important role in treating this disease.

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of definitive proton beam therapy (PBT) for primary sacral chordoma. Methods and Materials We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical outcomes of eligible patients with primary sacral chordoma who had undergone definitive PBT with 70.4 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 32 fractions at our institution from September 2009 to October 2015. Local progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, and overall survival were evaluated. To explore the factors that influenced local progression, the following parameters were analyzed: sex, the presence of a spacer (Gore-Tex sheets), gross tumor volume, and extent of cranial tumor extension. Adverse events were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. To assess the impact of PBT on pain relief, the change in pain grades was investigated between the initiation of PBT and the last follow-up visit. Results Thirty-three eligible patients were analyzed. The median follow-up period was 37 months. The 3-year estimated local progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, cause-specific survival, and overall survival rates were 89.6%, 88.2%, 81.9%, 95.7%, and 92.7%, respectively. No significant association was between the patients’ clinicopathologic characteristics and local progression-free survival. Four patients developed grade 3 adverse events, including acute dermatitis (n = 1), ileus (n = 1), and pain due to sacral insufficiency fractures (n = 2). The pain grades had improved, were unchanged, or had deteriorated in 15, 7, and 11 patients, respectively. Conclusions Definitive PBT with 70.4 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 32 fractions is an effective treatment with acceptable toxicity for primary sacral chordoma and has the potential to reduce pain.

PURPOSE Late complications such as brainstem necrosis are great concern of re-irradiation for brain tumor. Proton beam therapy can reduce radiation dose of organs at risk such as brainstem, so is expected to reduce late complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with medulloblastoma treated with re-irradiation from January 2015 to February 2019 at the Kobe Children’s Hospital and the Kobe Proton Center were reviewed. There were three cases of relapsed medulloblastoma and three cases of second cancer (glioblastomas). RESULTS In relapsed cases, all three cases treated with 12 Gy in 8 fractions cranio-spinal irradiation followed by gamma knife radiosurgery (one) or 28.8 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions of proton beam therapy (two). Follow-up periods were 8 to 19 months (median 12 months) and all three cases survived without relapse. In second cancer cases, all three cases were treated with 40.05 Gy per 15 fractions of radiation therapy (2 cases were treated with photon and one case with proton). However, all cases relapsed and two cases died of disease. CONCLUSION Twelve Gy in 8 fractions cranio-spinal irradiation followed by 28.8 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions of proton beam therapy is thought to be useful for the relapsed case. Re-irradiation for second cancer was disappointing and further study is warranted.

The optimal treatment for isolated local recurrence (ILR) of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after surgical resection remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of proton radiotherapy (PRT) for ILR of PDAC after surgery. The medical records of patients with ILR of PDAC after surgery who underwent proton beam therapy between 2011 and 2015 at Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center were retrospectively studied. The study analyzed 30 patients (14 women and 16 men) with a median age of 65 years (range 38–81 years) who had initially undergone pancreatoduodenectomy (n = 23) or distal pancreatectomy (n = 7) for their primary tumors. Upon ILR, PRT was administered with a median total cumulative dose of 67.5 gray equivalent (GyE) (range 50–67.5 GyE) using 19 to 25 fractions. For 25 patients, concurrent chemotherapy was administered using gemcitabine (n = 18) or S-1 (n = 7). Four patients (13.3%) experienced acute grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal toxicities. After a median follow-up period of 17.6 months (range 2.1–50.4 months), 23 patients had experienced tumor progression and 10 had died. Nine patients (30%) experienced local tumor progression. The median overall, progression-free, and local progression-free survival rates were 26.1, 12.3, and 41.2 months, respectively. Pre-PRT serum levels of cancer antigen 19-9 higher than 100 U/mL and duke pancreatic monoclonal antigen type 2 higher than 150 U/mL were significantly associated with shorter progression-free survival rates. Proton radiotherapy for ILR of PDAC after surgery is well tolerated and produces good locoregional control and should be considered for eligible patients.

Carbon ion therapy is a type of radiotherapy that can deliver high-dose radiation to a tumor while minimizing the dose delivered to organs at risk. Moreover, carbon ions are classified as high linear energy transfer radiation and are expected to be effective for even photon-resistant tumors. A 73-year-old man with glottic squamous cell carcinoma, T3N0M0, refused laryngectomy and received carbon ion therapy of 70 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) in 35 fractions. Three months after the therapy, the patient had an upper airway inflammation, and then laryngeal edema and pain occurred. Five months after the therapy, the airway stenosis was severe and computed tomography showed lack of the left arytenoid cartilage and exacerbation of laryngeal necrosis. Despite the treatment, 5 and a half months after the therapy, the laryngeal edema and necrosis had become even worse and the surrounding mucosa was edematous and pale. Six months after the therapy, pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy and reconstruction with free jejunal autograft were performed. The surgical specimen pathologically showed massive necrosis and no residual tumor. Three years after the carbon ion therapy, he is alive without recurrence. The first reported laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma case treated with carbon ion therapy resulted in an unexpected radiation laryngeal necrosis. Tissue damage caused by carbon ion therapy may be difficult to repair even for radioresistant cartilage; therefore, hollow organs reinforced by cartilage, such as the larynx, may be vulnerable to carbon ion therapy. Caution should be exercised when treating tumors in or adjacent to such organs with carbon ion therapy.

Background and purpose The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse the outcomes of cases of adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACCs) of the head and neck that were treated at a single institution with particle therapy consisting of either protons or carbon ions. Methods and materials Between February 2002 and March 2012, 80 patients were treated with proton therapy (PT) or carbon ion therapy (CIT) alone. PT and CIT were employed in 40 (50%) patients each, and more than half of the patients received 65.0 GyE in 26 fractions ( n =47, 59%). Results The median duration of follow-up was 38months (range, 6–115months). For all patients, the 5-year for overall survival (OS) rate, progression-free survival (PFS) rate, and local control (LC) rate were 63%, 39%, and 75%, respectively. No significant differences between PT and CIT were observed. The 5-year LC rates for T4 and inoperable cases were 66% and 68%, respectively. Twenty-one patients (26%) experienced grade 3 or greater late toxicities, including three patients who developed grade 5 bleeding from nasopharyngeal ulcers. Conclusions Particle radiotherapy for ACC achieves favourable LC, and its efficacy in inoperable or T4 cases is promising. There were no significant differences between PT and CIT in terms of OS, PFS and LC.

Introduction Although many reports have shown the safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for T1N0M0 non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it is rather difficult to treat T2N0M0 NSCLC, especially T2b (>5 cm) tumor, with SBRT. Our hypothesis was that particle therapy might be superior to SBRT in T2 patients. We evaluated the clinical outcome of particle therapy for T2a/bN0M0 NSCLC staged according to the 7th edition of the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) tumor, node, metastasis classification. Methods From April 2003 to December 2009, 70 histologically confirmed patients were treated with proton ( n = 43) or carbon-ion ( n = 27) therapy according to institutional protocols. Forty-seven patients had a T2a tumor and 23 had a T2b tumor. The total dose and fraction (fr) number were 60 (Gray equivalent) GyE/10 fr in 20 patients, 52.8 GyE/4 fr in 16, 66 GyE/10 fr in 16, 80 GyE/20 fr in 14, and other in four patients, respectively. Toxicities were scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0. Results The median follow-up period for living patients was 51 months (range, 24–103). For all 70 patients, the 4-year overall survival, local control, and progression-free survival rates were 58% (T2a, 53%; T2b, 67%), 75% (T2a, 70%; T2b, 84%), and 46% (T2a, 43%; T2b, 52%), respectively, with no significant differences between the two groups. The 4-year regional recurrence rate was 17%. Grade 3 pulmonary toxicity was observed in only two patients. Conclusion Particle therapy is well tolerated and effective for T2a/bN0M0 NSCLC. To further improve treatment outcome, adjuvant chemotherapy seems a reasonable option, whenever possible.

Purpose We conducted the study to assess the feasibility and efficacy of gemcitabine-concurrent proton radiotherapy (GPT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Materials and methods Of all 50 patients who participated in the study, 5 patients with gastrointestinal (GI)-adjacent LAPC were enrolled in P-1 (50Gy equivalent [GyE] in 25 fractions) and 5 patients with non-GI-adjacent LAPC in P-2 (70.2GyE in 26 fractions), and 40 patients with LAPC regardless of GI-adjacency in P-3 (67.5GyE in 25 fractions using the field-within-a-field technique). In every protocol, gemcitabine (800mg/m 2 /week for 3weeks) was administered concurrently. Every patient received adjuvant chemotherapy including gemcitabine after GPT within the tolerable limit. Results The median follow-up period was 12.5months. The scheduled GPT was feasible for all except 6 patients (12%) due to acute hematologic or GI toxicities. Grade 3 or greater late gastric ulcer and hemorrhage were seen in 5 patients (10%) in P-2 and P-3. The one-year freedom from local-progression, progression-free, and overall survival rates were 81.7%, 64.3%, and 76.8%, respectively. Conclusion GPT was feasible and showed high efficacy. Although the number of patients and the follow-up periods are insufficient, the clinical results seem very encouraging.

The prognosis of patients who have hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) associated with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (IVCTT) is very poor, and effective treatment modalities are extremely limited. The objective of this study was to determine the therapeutic efficacy of particle radiotherapy for HCC with IVCTT. Between June 2001 and January 2009, 16 evaluable patients who had HCC with IVCTT were treated with particle radiotherapy. They were divided into 2 groups: 6 were treated with curative intent; 10 with palliative intent. The local tumor control rates, overall survival rates, and toxicities were evaluated. All tumors treated with particle radiotherapy remained controlled without local recurrence at the last follow-up. The overall survival rates for the 16 patients at 1 and 3 years were 61.1 and 36.7%, respectively. We observed a significant difference in the survival rates according to treatment policy. The median survival time was 25.4 months for patients treated with curative intent and 7.7 months for those treated with palliative intent. The one-year survival rates were 100.0 and 33.3%, respectively. No Grade 3 or higher treatment-related toxicities were observed. Particle radiotherapy is thought to be potentially effective and safe for HCC with IVCTT. Considering the current lack of effective and less-invasive local therapy for HCC with IVCTT, particle radiotherapy may therefore be an attractive new therapeutic approach for this type of HCC.

粒子線はブラッグピーク （Bragg Peak） と呼ばれる物理学的な特徴があり，加速エネルギーに応じて体内のある一定の深さでピークを形成する。この性質を利用すれば，周囲の正常組織のダメージを最小限度に抑えながら病巣に限局性に高線量を集中できる。陽子線や炭素イオン線はX線より単位長さあたりに与える平均エネルギーが高い。そして陽子線，炭素イオン線の相対的生物学的効果比 （RBE: relative biological effectiveness） はそれぞれ1.1，3.0と見積もられており，いわゆる悪性黒色腫，腺様嚢胞癌，腺癌などの放射線抵抗性腫瘍にも効果が期待できる。2011年7月現在，日本においては9施設が稼働している。兵庫県立粒子線医療センターは兵庫対がん戦略のリーディングプロジェクトとして2001年5月に設立され，陽子線および炭素イオン線の両線種が使用可能な世界最初の施設である。局所に進行した鼻・副鼻腔・唾液腺腫瘍が良い適応となる。今後，機器の小型化，低価格化，臨床腫瘍学における粒子線治療の普及，強度変調粒子線治療（IMPT）が課題となっている。

Background. The purpose of the present study was to present the treatment outcomes of particle therapy for indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) diagnosed as stage I non-small cell lung cancer, including a comparative analysis involving pathologically proven lung cancer (PPLC).Material and methods. A total of 54 patients (57 lesions) who underwent particle therapy for IPNs were enrolled in this study. Median patient age was 76 (range 52–87) years. T-classification was: T1a, 30; T1b, 16; and T2a, 11. Particle therapy using protons or carbon ions was delivered at total doses of 52.8–80 Gy equivalent in 4–26 fractions. The PPLC cohort included 111 patients.Results. The median follow-up time was 41 (range 7–90) months. For all IPN patients, the three-year overall survival, progression-free survival, local control and distant progression-free survival rates were 90%, 72%, 94% and 79%, respectively. Grade 2 toxicities were radiation pneumonitis (19%), dermatitis (9%), rib fracture (2%), chest wall pain (2%) and neuropathy (2%). No ≥ grade 3 toxicities were observed. In univariate analysis, the IPN group showed significantly better survival relative to the PPLC group. However, after adjustment for baseline imbalances between these two groups in multivariate analysis, pathological confirmation did not correlate with survival.Conclusions. Particle therapy for IPNs provided favorable outcomes with minimal toxicities, which may be comparable to those for PPLC patients. Further studies are needed to clarify the optimal management of IPN patients.

Objective: To study the oncological outcome of the patients with unresectable locally advanced primary head and neck cancers invading the skull base, treated with particle radiotherapy. Methods: Fifty-seven patients with unresectable primary head and neck cancers invading the skull base received proton or carbon ion radiotherapy as definitive treatment at Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center between 2003 and 2009. Forty-seven patients were treated with proton radiotherapy and 10 patients were treated with carbon ion radiotherapy. A retrospective review was performed with clinical charts and recorded imagings. Results: With a median follow-up of 32 months, the 3-year actual survival and local progressionfree rates of all the patients were 61 and 56%, respectively. The 3-year actual survival rates of adenoid cystic carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, olfactory neuroblastoma, adenocarcinoma and malignant melanoma were 83, 44, 75, 0 and 38%, respectively. The 3-year actual local control rates of adenoid cystic carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, olfactory neuroblastoma, adenocarcinoma and malignant melanoma were 63, 31, 83, 50 and 0%, respectively. Distant metastasis was observed in 13 of 25 patients in adenoid cystic carcinoma, two of 14 patients in squamous cell carcinoma, one of six patients with olfactory neuroblastoma, two of four patients with adenocarcinoma, three of four patients with malignant melanoma and two of three patients with undifferentiated carcinoma. Mucositis and dermatitis were seen as acute toxicities. The most common late toxicity was visual disorder. Grades 2, 3 and 4 visual disorders were observed in seven, five and two patients, respectively. Conclusions: Proton and carbon ion radiotherapy resulted in satisfactory local control in patients with locally advanced unresectable primary head and neck cancers invading the skull base.

Superior sulcus tumor( SST) is a rare type of lung cancer. Treatment usually consists of surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy. We report a case of a woman in her fifties who underwent carbon ion radiotherapy for SST. The patient complained of left shoulder pain, and imaging studies revealed a 5.2×3.5-cm local solid tumor at the apex of the left lung, invasion to the ribs, and no lymph node swelling. The level of tumor marker, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), was 5.7 ng/mL. Needle biopsy specimen revealed adenocarcinoma. The diagnosis was SST, T3N0M0, stage IIB. We did not detect Horner syndrome. Carbon ion radiotherapy at 66 Gy equivalent dose per 10 fractions was administered to the SST site. Subsequently, the tumor size decreased to 4.5×1.9-cm. The adverse effect was Grade 1 skin and pulmonary toxicity. Six months later, Grade 2 left shoulder connective tissue toxicity was observed; it was difficult to differentiate this from tumor recurrence. After 2.5 years from radiotherapy, the patient is free from recurrence. Carbon ion radiotherapy is effective and safe and can be considered as an important treatment option for SST.

This study retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of particle therapy using carbon ions or protons for primary sacral chordomas.We evaluated 23 patients with primary sacral chordoma treated with carbon ion therapy (CIT) or proton therapy (PT) between July 2005 and June 2011 at the Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan. The median patient age was 72 years. 14 patients were treated with 70.4 Gy equivalents (GyE) in 16 fractions and 9 were treated with 70.4 GyE in 32 fractions. CIT was used for 16 patients, and PT was used for 7 patients.The median follow-up period was 38 months. At 3 years, local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients were 94%, 83% and 68%, respectively. The log-rank test revealed that male sex was significantly related to better PFS (p=0.029). No other factors, including dose fractionation and ion type, were significant for LC, OS or PFS. In nine patients, ≥ Grade 3 acute dermatitis was observed, and ≥ Grade 3 late toxicities were observed in nine patients. The 32-fraction protocol reduced severe toxicities in both the acute and late phases compared with the 16-fraction protocol.Particle therapy for patients with sacral chordoma showed favourable LC and OS. Severe toxicities were successfully reduced by modifying the dose fractionation and treatment planning in the later treatment era. Thus, this therapeutic modality should be considered useful and safe.This is the first study including both CIT and PT for sacral chordomas.

To retrospectively analyze treatment outcomes after particle therapy using protons or carbon ions for mucosal melanoma of the head and neck (HNMM) at the Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center, as well as to compare proton therapy (PT) and carbon ion therapy (CIT). Data from 62 HNMM patients without metastasis, treated with PT or CIT between October 2003 and April 2011 were analyzed. Median patient age was 70.5 years (range 33–89 years). Of the total patients, 33 (53 %) had received PT and 29 (47 %) had undergone CIT. Protocols for 65 or 70.2 GyE in 26 fractions were used for both ion types. Median follow-up was 18.0 months (range 5.2–82.7 months). The 1-/2-year overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) rates were 93 %/61 % and 93 %/78 % for all patients, 91 %/44 % and 92 %/71 % for the PT patients and 96 %/62 % and 95 %/59 % for the CIT patients, respectively. No significant differences were observed between PT and CIT. Local recurrence was observed in 8 patients (PT: 5, CIT: 3) and 29 (PT: 18, CIT: 11) experienced distant metastases. Acute reactions were acceptable and all patients completed the planned radiotherapy. Regarding late toxicity, grade 3 or greater events were observed in 5 patients (PT: 3, CIT: 2), but no significant difference was observed between PT and CIT. Our single-institution retrospective analysis demonstrated that particle therapy for HNMM achieved good LC, but OS was unsatisfactory. There were no significant differences between PT and CIT in terms of either efficacy or toxicity.

Background and purpose This retrospective study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and late toxicities of proton therapy (PT) with those of carbon ion therapy (CIT) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Material and methods A total of 111 patients who underwent particle therapy for stage I NSCLC between April 2003 and December 2009 were enrolled in this study. PT ( n= 70) and CIT ( n= 41) were delivered to total doses of 52.8–80GyE in 4–26 fractions and 52.8–70.2GyE in 4–26 fractions, respectively. The median follow-up time was 41months. Results Differences in outcome between the PT and CIT groups regarding 3-year overall survival (72% and 76%, respectively), progression-free survival (44% and 53%, respectively), and local control (81% and 78%, respectively) were not statistically significant. In multivariate analysis, the type of treatment beam did not correlate with overall survival. The severity of late toxicities was comparable between the two groups. Conclusions Clinical results in the PT group were comparable to those in the CIT group. However, this study was a retrospective analysis of a highly heterogeneous population. Consequently, more homogeneous prospective data, large multicentric databases and, ideally, randomized trials are warranted.

HIBMC is the world’s first facility to be able to use both proton (PRT) and carbon‐ion radiotherapy (CiRT). The medically dedicated synchrotron can accelerate protons up to 230 MeV and carbon ions up to 320 MeV. From April 2001 to March 2010, the facility treated 3275 patients, with 2487 patients treated using PRT and 788 using CiRT. Particle radiotherapy was delivered to patients suffering from malignant tumors originating in the head and neck (502 patients), lungs (330), liver (539), prostate (1283), and the bone & soft tissue (130). The clinical results are as follows: (1) H & N tumors: The 2‐year overall survival (OS) rates of patients with olfactory neuroblastoma, mucoepidermoid cancer, adenoid cystic cancer, adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and malignant melanoma was 100%, 86%, 78%, 78%, 66%, and 62%, respectively. (2) Lung cancer: For all 80 patients, the 3‐year OS rate was 75% (Stage IA: 74%; Stage IB: 76%) and local control (LC) rate was 82% (IA: 87%; IB: 77%). Grade 3 pulmonary toxicity was observed in only 1 patient. These results are comparable to those obtained by surgery, and indicate proton therapy and carbon‐ion therapy are safe and effective for stage I lung cancer. (3) Liver cancer: The 5‐year LC rate for 429 tumor patient was 90%, and the 5‐year OS rate for 364 patients was 38%. These results seem equivalent to those obtained by surgery or radio‐frequency ablation. (4) Prostate cancer: In 290 patients treated by proton radiotherapy, five patients died from other disease in the median follow‐up period of 62 months. Biochemical disease‐free survival and OS rate at 5 years was 88.2% and 96.5%, respectively. Our proton radiotherapy showed excellent OS and biochemical disease‐free survival rates with minimum late morbidities. PRT VS CiRT: From our retrospective analysis, it seems that there is no significant difference in the LC and OS rate in H&N, lung and liver cancer between PRT and CiRT.

BACKGROUND: A study was undertaken to evaluate the clinical outcome of particle therapy for stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: From April 2003 to April 2007, 80 patients with stage I NSCLC were treated with proton therapy or carbon-ion therapy (57 with proton therapy and 23 with carbon-ion therapy) using 3 treatment protocols. In the first protocol, 80 gray equivalents (GyE) of proton therapy was given in 20 fractions, and the second proton therapy protocol used 60 GyE in 10 fractions. For carbon-ion therapy, 52.8 GyE was given in 4 fractions. After achieving promising preliminary results for the first protocol, the authors started to use the second proton therapy protocol to shorten the overall treatment time. Carbon-ion therapy was started in 2005, and thereafter, both proton and carbon-ion therapy plans were made for each patient, and the 1 that appeared superior was adopted. Patient age ranged from 48 to 89 years (median, 76 years). Thirty-seven patients were medically inoperable, and 43 refused surgery. Forty-two patients had T1 tumors, and 38 had T2 tumors. RESULTS: The median follow-up period for living patients was 35.5 months. For all 80 patients, the 3-year overall survival, cause-specific survival, and local control rates were 75% (IA: 74%; IB: 76%), 86% (IA: 84%; IB: 88%), and 82% (IA: 87%; IB: 77%), respectively. There were no significant differences in treatment results among the 3 protocols. Grade 3 pulmonary toxicity was observed in only 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: Proton therapy and carbon-ion therapy are safe and effective for stage I NSCLC. Further investigation of particle therapy for stage I NSCLC is warranted. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.

The Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center was established in May 2001, a leading project of the ‘Hyogo Cancer Strategy’. As its major characteristic, both proton and carbon ion beams can be generated. The accelerator is a synchrotron that can accelerate proton and carbon ion beams at a maximum of 230 and 320 MeV/u, respectively, and the maximum ranges in water are 300 and 200 mm, respectively. Three irradiation rooms installed with 45-degree, horizontal/vertical, and horizontal fixed ports can be used for carbon ion radiation therapy, and 2 gantry rooms can be additionally used for proton beams. Particle beam radiation therapy had been performed in 2,639 patients as of the end of March 2009. The diseases treated were prostate cancer, head and neck tumors, liver cancer, lung cancer, and bone soft tissue tumors, in decreasing order of frequency, and these 5 major diseases accounted for 87% of the cases. The outcomes surpassed those of surgical therapy, realizing cancer therapy without resection. As the current problems of particle beam radiation therapy, the effect of the differential use of proton and carbon ion beams is unclear, adverse events, such as skin disorders, may occur due to the limitation of the broad beam method, and the necessity to install large-scale devices is an obstacle to its dissemination. We are aiming at the development and clinical application of a laser-driven proton radiotherapy device in cooperation with the Japan Atomic Energy Agency.

The proton radiotherapy (PRT) has been spreading, since 1990 when 250 MeV proton beams with rotation gantry was developed for medical use. On the other hand, carbon‐ion radiotherapy (CRT) that has both physical and biological features is available at 4 facilities in the world. HIBMC is the only facility to be able to use both particles. From Apr 2001 to Dec 2008, 2486 patients were treated with PRT in 2030 patients or with CRT in 456. Treatment to the Head and Neck (H&N: in 405 patients), the lung (245), the liver (371), and the prostatic carcinoma (1059) was a major subject. The 2‐year local control rates is 72% in H&N (n = 163, T1:9, T2:18, T3:36, T4:79, malignant melanoma 48, adenoid cystic carcinoma 35, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) 32, adenocarcinoma 14, others 34), 88% in lung (n = 116, T1:59, T2:42, T3:4, T4:6, SCC 30, adenocarcinoma 59, others 27), and 89% in liver cancer (n = 153, Proton: 130, carbon: 23). Biochemical disease free 3‐year survival of 291 prostate cancer is 100% in 9 patients with ...

Purpose/Objective(s): Bone and soft tissue sarcomas (BSTSs) have been considered to be radioresistant and the mainstay of the treatment is surgery. Particle therapy using carbon ions or protons has potential to be an alternative of surgery in the treatment of BSTSs because of the ability to deliver[for full text, please go to the a.m. URL], PTCOG 48; Meeting of the Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group