Search

Background: Although few patients with breast cancer experience tumor progression during neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST), their extremely poor outcomes are similar to patients who fail to achieve pathological complete response (pCR). No reports have compared patients with pCR, non-pCR, and progression during NST to determine the survival outcomes.Methods: This retrospective chart review of patients with stage I–III breast cancer was conducted between January 2001 and December 2018. pCR was defined as no invasive cancer or in situ residuals in the breast and lymph nodes (ypT0 ypN0). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan–Meier methods.Results: Of the 595 patients who received NST, 167 (29.2%) had pCR (pCR group), 404 (70.8%) responded to NST but did not have pCR (non-pCR group), and 24 (4.0%) experienced tumor progression during NST (PD group). The median DFS was 6.0 months, 154.0 months, and not reached in the PD, non-pCR, and pCR groups, respectively. The PD group had significantly shorter DFS than patients without tumor progression in the pCR and non-pCR groups [hazard ratios (HR) 13.0, 95% CI: 8.1–21.0, p < 0.01]. The median OS was 13.6 months (95% CI: 10.4–35.5) in the PD group and was not reached in the pCR and non-pCR (non-PD) groups. The OS was significantly poorer in the PD group than in the non-PD group (HR 15.8, 95% CI: 9.2–27.1, p < 0.01).Conclusion: The PD group had the poorest survival outcomes even after recurrence, thus warranting new treatment targets.

Aim: The adverse events of the CKD4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib are known to be dose dependent. However, its pharmacokinetics vary among individuals. Abemaciclib is reported to be transported by P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP). Therefore, we evaluated whether ABCB1 and ABCG2 gene polymorphisms could be pharmacokinetic predictive factors of abemaciclib. Methods: A total of 45 patients with breast cancer able to take abemaciclib (150 mg twice daily) for 2 weeks were evaluated to determine the association among abemaciclib concentrations, adverse events, and ABCB1 1236T>C, 2677G>T/A, 3435C>T, and ABCG2 421C>A gene polymorphisms. Results: The trough concentrations of abemaciclib were higher in the group with grade 2 or greater neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia as compared with the group with grades 0 or 1. No significant association was observed between ABCB1 1236T>C, 3435C>T, and ABCG2 421C>A gene polymorphisms and abemaciclib concentrations. However, in ABCB1 2677G>T/A polymorphisms, the concentrations of abemaciclib tended to be higher in the homozygous group (AA + AT) as compared with that in the wild-type and heterozygous group (GG + GA + GT) [222.8 (80.5–295.8) ng/mL vs. 115.8 (23.6–355.2) ng/mL, P = 0.11]. Hence, the ABCB1 2677G>T/A homozygous group had a significantly higher incidence of abemaciclib withdrawal and dose reduction within 4 weeks as compared than the wild-type and heterozygous group (67% vs. 33%, P = 0.03). Conclusions: The gene polymorphism of ABCB1 2677G> T/A might be a predictor of the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of abemaciclib.

Japanese women have the highest life expectancy in the world and breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer among them. However, little data are available to support the evidence-based clinical management due to the fact that older adults are commonly excluded from most clinical trials. In Japan the rate of other cause of death in older patient was about a half, then we should consider whether or not breast cancer may affect the patient’s life expectancy to avoid either overtreatment or undertreatment. Although management principles in older patients may be similar with those of younger age, these differences would be caused by relatively short life expectancy, some comorbidity, drug interactions and low functional status. Then, their treatment needs to be individualized. To this end, employing a comprehensive geriatric assessment may be advantageous, which enables to evaluate patient vulnerability from several different aspects, to predict adverse events of chemotherapy and to identify geriatric problems in advance so that extra support and modified treatment can be provided. Before treatment we should assess the patient’s goals and values regarding the management of the cancer, especially on balancing survival benefit with immediate quality of life impairment due to anti-cancer therapy. In Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) , a randomized controlled trial for older patients with advanced stage HER2-positive breast cancer is ongoing as an inferiority design including geriatric assessment (JCOG1607, HARB TEA study). Best practice, current management and how to approach decision making in older patients with breast cancer are summarized.

Background Physicians recommend adjuvant therapy to patients based on baseline risk. A common recognition for baseline risk between patients and physicians is critical for successful adjuvant therapy. We prospectively investigated the differences in estimated baseline risk between physicians and patients with early breast cancer. Methods This analysis was performed at a single institution in Japan. Early breast cancer patients over 18 years old were enrolled after surgery. After explaining the pathological results, physicians asked each patient about an estimated baseline risk. Differences in estimated baseline risk were defined as the baseline risk estimated by patients minus the baseline risk estimated by physicians. The primary endpoint was that the number of patients who estimate baseline risk higher than physicians was higher than those who estimate a lower baseline risk. The secondary endpoints were differences in estimated baseline risk by stage, subtype and the influence of patient factors to differences in estimated baseline risk. Results From July 2017 to December 2018, 262 patients were enrolled. Among the 262 patients, 190 estimated a higher baseline risk than physicians, 53 estimated a lower baseline risk and 19 estimated the same. Overall, patients estimated a significantly higher baseline risk than physicians (P < 0.001). Differences in estimated baseline risk was significantly smaller in patients who knew the term ‘baseline risk’ than patients who did not (P = 0.0037). Differences in estimated baseline risk were also significantly smaller in patients with stage II breast cancer than patients with stage I (P = 0.0239). However, there were no statistically significant differences of differences in estimated baseline risk according to other factors. Conclusions Patients with early breast cancer estimated a significantly higher baseline risk than physicians. Physicians should accurately explain baseline risk to patients for shared decision making.

PURPOSE We report findings on quality of life (QoL) in the RESPECT trial, which compared adjuvant trastuzumab monotherapy with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in older patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients age 70-80 years with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive surgically treated breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive trastuzumab (T) or trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (T + C). QoL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire, and Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index of Competence at baseline and after 2, 12, and 36 months. Comparisons were based on individual changes from baseline and were performed by Fisher’s test or mixed-model repeated-measures. RESULTS Among 275 patients in the parent study, 231 (84%) (average age: 74 years) were included in the analysis. At 2, 12, and 36 months, 198, 177, and 178 patients completed surveys, and the mean FACT-G scores at each survey point were 78.9, 80.4, 82.7, and 79.1 in group T and 79.5, 74.5, 78.4, and 78.5 in group T + C. Compared with group T + C, the proportion of patients showing QoL deterioration (≥ 5 points decrease from baseline in FACT-G) was significantly lower at 2 months (31% v 48%; P = .016) and 12 months (19% v 38%; P = .009). In group T, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score ( P = .003) and the proportion of severe sensory peripheral neuropathy ( P = .001) were significantly lower at 2 months, and Philadelphia Geriatric Center Morale Scale and Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index of Competence scores were significantly higher ( P = .024, .042) at 12 months. At 36 months, there were no significant differences in any QoL items. CONCLUSION Detrimental effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on global QoL, morale, and activity capacity lasted for at least 12 months but were not observed at 36 months.

The standard first-line treatment for patients with human epidermal growth factor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer is a combination therapy of trastuzumab, pertuzumab and docetaxel, and the standard second-line treatment is trastuzumab emtansine. However, it may be difficult for the elderly to maintain sufficient intensity of treatment due to severe adverse events of trastuzumab, pertuzumab and docetaxel. The aim of this trial is to confirm the non-inferiority of trastuzumab emtansine over trastuzumab, pertuzumab and docetaxel in terms of overall survival in elderly (65-year-old or more) patients with human epidermal growth factor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer. If improved overall survival and fewer toxicities are observed, trastuzumab emtansine may be a feasible new standard first-line treatment for elderly patients with human epidermal growth factor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer. A planned total 330 patients will be enrolled from 45 institutions over 6.5 years. This trial has been registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000030783 [http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm].

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) have been approved for breast cancer (BC) treatment. Several trials suggested that arthralgia was reduced in patients treated with ET plus CDK4/6i compared with that in those with ET-alone. We aimed to compare arthralgia rates in BC patients treated with/without CDK4/6i. We reviewed randomized controlled phase II/III trials investigating CDK4/6i with ET in hormone receptor-positive and epidermal growth factor 2-negative BC. Publications were retrieved from PubMed from January 2014 to April 2021. We compared arthralgia rates between patients who were administered ET plus CDK4/6i (CDK4/6i group) and those treated with ET-alone (control group). We reviewed 12 trials that reported data on adverse effects for arthralgia. These trials included 17,440 patients (9255 in the CDK4/6i group and 8185 in the control group). The arthralgia rate in the CDK4/6i group was significantly lower than that in the control group (27.6% vs. 34.8%, p .001), especially in early BC (28.8% vs. 37.3%, p .001). These suggested that the arthralgia rate in patients treated with ET plus CDK4/6i was lower than that in patients treated with ET-alone and that CDK4/6i may decrease the arthralgia rate in BC patients treated with ET, especially in early BC.

PurposeWomen diagnosed with early breast cancer are faced with a choice of surgical procedures. Although one of the essential factors in surgical shared decision making is the impact on the body image, the breast morphology after breast conserving surgery is particularly difficult to explain in a uniform manner due to large individual differences. MethodsPatients with breast cancer eligible for breast conserving surgery (BCS) were recruited between June 2020 and October 2021. We surveyed the patients’ satisfaction with our explanation method about breast morphology after BCS using 3D breast imaging in the form of a questionnaire.ResultsA total of 162 patients were enrolled and 137 (84.6%) answered the questionnaire. One hundred and sixteen patients (84.6%) answered that they were very satisfied or satisfied with our explanation method and 100 (73.0%) patients were very satisfied or satisfied with the 3D breast imaging. Some patients answered that visually understanding the breast morphology by 3D breast imaging helped them to prepare for BCS, or on the contrary, made them chose mastectomy with breast reconstruction because the postoperative deformation of BCS was found to be unacceptable. Only a few patients who actually underwent BCS felt that their postoperative morphology was more deformed than the preoperatively imagined one.ConclusionOur results suggest that our preoperative explanation method using 3D breast imaging was useful for shared decision making. We think that 3D breast imaging can help the patients to visualize the individual shape of their breast, and the tumor position and size.

Background Neoplastic seeding (NS) can occur after tissue biopsy, which is a clinical issue especially in mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. This is because postoperative radiation is not usually given and local recurrence of preserved skin flap may increase. The purpose of this study is to investigate the importance of preoperative evaluation of NS and the validity of biopsy scar excision. Patients and methods We retrospectively analysed 174 cases of mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. The primary endpoint is the frequency of clinical and pathological NS and the secondary endpoint is the problem of excision of needle biopsy site. Results Three cases (1.7%) had preoperative clinical findings of NS. Pathological examination revealed NS in all three cases. Biopsy scars could be excised in 115 cases among 171 cases without clinical NS. Pathological NS was found in 1 of 66 (1.5%) cases of which pathological examination was performed. Biopsy scars could not be excised in the remaining 56 cases: the biopsy scar could not be identified in 41 cases, and there was concern about a decrease in flap blood flow after excision in 15 cases. In 12 of these 15 cases, the scars were close to the skin incision; excision of these scars might have triggered skin necrosis between the incision and the biopsy scar excision site. No postoperative complications were observed. Conclusions It is important to preoperatively evaluate clinical NS, and biopsy scars should be excised in clinical NS cases. Even in cases without clinical NS, biopsy scar excision should be considered. It is also important to perform a biopsy in consideration of the incision design for reconstructive surgery., It is important to evaluate clinical neoplastic seeding (NS) due to biopsy. Biopsy scars should be excised in clinical NS cases. Excision should be considered even without clinical NS.

Background: PAL is a first-in-class cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) for the treatment of HR+/HER2− ABC. Two CDK4/6is are currently available in Japan; PAL and abemaciclib (ABE). CDK4/6i+endocrine therapy (ET) has shown significant clinical benefits compared to ET alone in clinical trials. CDK4/6i combination therapy is strongly recommended as a first-line (1L) treatment in global and Japanese treatment guidelines. However, no optimal subsequent treatment has been established after discontinuing treatment with CDK4/6i+ET. Substantial data are required to determine whether the available treatment options remain effective after CDK4/6i treatment. Here, we report the treatment pattern of subsequent therapy after PAL in a real-world setting in Japan to provide insights into the optimal subsequent therapy. Methods: This retrospective, observational study utilized a nationwide hospital-based medical claims database managed by Medical Data Vision (MDV). The MDV database, one of the largest medical databases in Japan, covers 26% of acute-care hospitals across Japan, including 226 cancer therapeutic facilities. We evaluated the data of patients who received PAL from September 2017 to June 2021 and subsequently received therapy. Any treatment for ABC initiated within 30 days was considered part of one regimen. The median time-to-treatment failure (TTF) of subsequent therapy was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: From the database, we identified 1,170 patients with HR+/HER2− ABC who received PAL, among which 398 (34%) received combination therapy as 1L treatment. The median age at PAL initiation was 64 years (range 53–72), and 13.0% of the patients were pre-/peri-menopausal. Among the 398 patients, 224 (56.3%) received therapy after PAL+ET. Endocrine-based therapy was commonly used as the first subsequent therapy (n=136; 60.7%), including CDK4/6i+ET (n=70; 31.2%), ET alone (n=39; 17.4%), and everolimus+ET (n=27; 12.1%). Among the 81 (36.2%) patients who received chemotherapy as the first subsequent therapy, 27 (12.1%) received bevacizumab+chemotherapy. The median TTF (95% confidence interval [CI]) of the first subsequent therapy was 7.5 months (6.5–8.4), and that of each subsequent regimen is listed in Table 1. The median TTF (95% CI) for patients received CDK4/6i+ET as first subsequent therapy after PAL+ET was the longest among the regimens, 10.9 months (6.5–15.6). Among the 70 patients, 36 changed only CDK4/6i type, 17 changed only ET type, and 12 changed both CDK4/6i and ET types. The median TTF (95% CI) was 20.1 months (6.5– not reached [NR]), 8.7 months (2.9–11.2), and 7.7 months (2.6–NR), respectively. No obvious trend was observed between the TTF of PAL+ET as a 1L treatment and the TTF of subsequent ABE after the PAL+ET treatment. Conclusion: More than half the patients received endocrine-based therapy after PAL+ET as a 1L treatment, and the observed treatment duration was comparable to the results of clinical trials reported to date, even after PAL treatment. ET+targeted therapy and chemotherapy represent acceptable treatment options after PAL+ET. One-third of patients received CDK4/6i+ET after PAL+ET in Japanese clinical practice; however, further investigation is warranted to confirm that this treatment strategy is effective. Table 1. Median TTF of each subsequent therapy after PAL+ET Citation Format: Masataka Sawaki, Yasuaki Muramatsu, Kanae Togo, Hiroji Iwata. Real-world treatment duration of subsequent therapy after palbociclib (PAL) in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) in Japan [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-01-26.

Purpose: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (LE) significantly impairs the patients’ quality of life. Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is a strong risk factor for LE in breast cancer surgery. In addition, postoperative administration of docetaxel (DTX) has been reported to be a risk factor for LE in patients who undergo ALND. Herein, we performed a secondary analysis of the risk of objective LE after ALND using data from our previous study.Methods: Patients who visited the medical follow-up clinic between 12 November 2018 and 11 January 2019 and at least one year postoperatively were eligible for this study. Objective LE was defined as a difference of at least 2 cm between the affected and unaffected arms or when therapeutic intervention had already been performed for LE. The risk factors for objective LE according to taxane-containing regimen, radiation therapy, and body mass index and the effects of a taxane-containing regimen followed by supraclavicular irradiation on LE were examined.Results: Objective LE was observed in 52 patients (24%). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that supraclavicular field irradiation was a statistically significant risk factor for objective LE. The sequential use of taxane-containing regimen and supraclavicular RT was more likely to be a risk factor for LE than ALND alone.Conclusion: The risk for LE was more likely to be higher with the sequential use of taxane-containing chemotherapy and supraclavicular field irradiation. Therefore, management of LE is important these cases.

Aim: To reveal the treatment patterns of palbociclib and complete blood count (CBC) monitoring in a Japanese real-world setting. Materials & methods: Deidentified data of patients with advanced breast cancer who received palbociclib from 2017 to 2020 were examined from a Japanese claims database. Results & conclusion: We identified 1074 patients. Palbociclib was commonly prescribed as second- or later-line treatment in 2017/2018; thereafter its first-line treatment increased. Regardless of treatment lines, fulvestrant was most commonly prescribed in combination with palbociclib (57–66% in the first–third-line), and this finding differed from that in the USA. Most patients initiated palbociclib at 125 mg/day; however, over a half of patients reduced doses within the first 8 weeks. Although CBC was regularly monitored, some patients did not undergo blood tests. Early dose reduction and CBC monitoring should be performed cautiously to minimize safety concern and prevent early treatment discontinuation.

Purpose The CKD4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib is related to adverse events such as hematological toxicity and increase in serum creatinine levels associated with abemaciclib pharmacokinetics. Increase in serum creatinine levels is considered a result of competition with abemaciclib via organic cation transporter 2 and multidrug and toxic compound extrusion. Therefore, we evaluated the association among serum creatinine levels, serum abemaciclib concentrations, and adverse events and whether increase in serum creatinine levels is a useful indicator for predicting the onset of the adverse events of abemaciclib. Methods In total, the data of 12 patients with breast cancer who were treated with abemaciclib (150 mg twice daily) were evaluated to determine the association between increased serum creatinine levels and abemaciclib concentrations and hematological toxicity. Results Grade 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia were observed at 4 weeks in four (33%), two (17%), and one (8%) patients, respectively. A significant association was observed between steady-state abemaciclib concentrations and the rate of decrease in neutrophil and platelet counts (r = - 0.80, P = 0.003 and r = - 0.70, P = 0.016, respectively). Compared with baseline levels (0.61 [0.53-0.82] mg/mL), serum creatinine levels significantly increased and reached a steady state in at least 2 weeks (0.84 [0.61-1.02] mg/mL, P = 0.01). However, we did not find a significant association between increase in serum creatinine levels and abemaciclib concentrations and hematological toxicity. Conclusions Abemaciclib concentrations are associated with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. However, increase in serum creatinine levels may not be a useful predictor for estimating abemaciclib pharmacokinetics and hematological toxicity.

Background Bevacizumab is an antiangiogenic agent, and that synergizes with chemotherapeutic drugs. When used in combination therapies, Bevacizumab is associated with adverse events such as hemorrhage, gastrointestinal perforation, delayed wound healing, and pneumothorax. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying these adverse events are not fully understood. Case summary A 45-year-old female with multiple lung metastases that were derived from primary breast cancer, was placed on Bevacizumab + paclitaxel therapy, since this combination has a potent antitumor effect. She reported dyspnea before cycle 3, day 1 and we therefore ran a chest X-ray, which detected a right pneumothorax. The coronal plane computed tomography revealed that one solid mass rapidly necrosed and was replaced by a cavity that passed through the bronchus in the right lower lobe. The cavity eventually ruptured the pleura and made the bronchopleural fistula that led to this pneumothorax. Thoracic cavity drainage using an intercostal catheter was performed. On the 7th day of drainage, the patient was discharged from our hospital on recovery. Recurrence of pneumothorax was not reported, and continuation of chemotherapy was made possible by changing the regimen. Conclusion Patients with lung metastases surrounding the bronchi and on the pleura should be monitored for pneumothorax by Bevacizumab-containing chemotherapies.

Although phase III trials have been published comparing whole breast irradiation (WBI) with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), long-term follow-up results are lacking. We report the 10-year follow-up results of a prospective phase I/II clinical trial of IORT. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) tumor size 50 years, (iv) negative margins after resection and (v) sentinel lymph node-negative disease. A single dose of IORT (19–21 Gy) was delivered to the tumor bed in the operation room just after wide local excision of the primary breast cancer using a 6–12 MeV electron beam. Local recurrence was defined as recurrence or new disease within the treated breast and was evaluated annually using mammography and ultrasonography. A total of 32 patients were eligible for evaluation. The median patient age was 65 years and the median follow-up time was 10 years. Two patients experienced local recurrence just under the nipple, out of the irradiated field, after 8 years of follow-up. Three patients had contralateral breast cancer and one patient experienced bone metastasis after 10 years of follow-up. No patient experienced in-field recurrence nor breast cancer death. Eight patients had hypertrophic scarring at the last follow-up. There were no lung or heart adverse effects. This is the first report of 10-year follow-up results of IORT as APBI. The findings suggest that breast cancer with extended intraductal components should be treated with great caution.

The utility of regional nodal irradiation (RNI) is being considered in cases of 1-3 axillary node metastases after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND). Therefore, we examined the necessity of RNI by examining the sites of recurrences in cases at our institution. We retrospectively analyzed 5,164 cases of primary breast cancer between January 2000 and December 2014 at the Aichi Cancer Centre, identifying local and distant recurrences in 152 patients with primary breast cancer treated with BCS and ALND and who had 1-3 positive axillary nodes. All patients received whole-breast irradiation (WBI) and adjuvant systemic therapy with either chemotherapy or anti-endocrine therapy with or without anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 therapy. The present study excluded patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, contralateral breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, T4 tumors or N2-3 nodes and distant metastasis. From the database of our institution, we identified 152 cases that met the defined criteria. The median follow-up period was 71 months (1-176). Isolated locoregional recurrences were found in three patients (2.0%) and were recurrent only in the breast. Only one patient had local lymph node recurrence with distant recurrence. The 10-year rates of isolated regional disease-free survival (DFS), DFS, and overall survival were 95.41, 89.50 and 96.75%, respectively, which was better compared with previous studies. We conclude that the addition of RNI to WBI is not necessary for Japanese patients who have 1-3 positive axillary nodes and ALND.

Background: Paclitaxel (PTX) is one of the key drugs for primary and metastatic breast cancer. The management of PTX induced peripheral neuropathy (PN) is not easy regardless of several reports about the prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Recently, the effectiveness of compression therapy for nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel induced PN using surgical gloves (SG) was reported from Japan. However, we consider the accurate assessment of CIPN is difficult because it is evaluated by mainly subjective symptoms, therefore, some biases such as performance bias and detection bias occurred easily. Additionally, it is difficult to confirm the reproducibility of the assessment. In this study, we assess the effectiveness of compression therapy using SG (same procedure as previous reports) for the prevention of CIPN based on the complete blind for patients and assessing physician which means the study design to minimize the biases. Methods: The early and recurrence breast cancer patients who started chemotherapy of weekly PTX 80mg/m2(± Trastuzumab or Bevacizumab or Pertuzumab±Trastuzumab) were enrolled. Each patient installed SG on both hands at every PTX infusion. Two one-size smaller SG was installing on one hand (study side) and two just fitted SG was installing on another hand (control side) during 90 minutes from 30 minutes before the infusion to 30 minutes after the end of the infusion. Study side and control side are blind for both patients and physicians according to the determination of the study side by research nurses in the chemotherapy unit. The primary outcome is the difference in the frequency of CIPN (motor/sensory) between the study side and the control side determined by the physician using the CTCAE v4.0. Grade 2 or more were considered to be CIPN. The secondary outcome is the difference in the frequency of CIPN (motor/sensory) assessed by the patients using Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the CTCAE (PRO-CTCAE). For the severity assessment, ‘moderate’ or more and for the interfering with the daily activities assessment, ’somewhat’ or more was considered as an event. We planned sample size as follows. We assessed the frequency of more than grade2 PN in the control hand is 30% based on previous reports. According to the previous study of compression therapy, we expected 15% difference between each side with 80 % power and a significance level for a two-sided test of 0.05. We consider 5% of the dropout rate, the planned total sample size was 55 patients. McNemar Chi-squared test was used to assess the primary and secondary outcome. Results: Between July 11, 2017 and November 26, 2018, 56 patients were enrolled from our institution. Two patients who complained uncomfortableness of installing SG and unmatched five patients for the inclusion criteria were excluded. As a result, 49 patients were evaluated. For the patient characteristics, median age was 53, 43(87.8%) were early and 6(12.2%) were recurrence breast cancer patients. 21 patients underwent axillary dissection. At the end of the PTX regimen, Grade 2 or more PN (sensory) was observed 34.7% and 34.7% in the study and control side, respectively (McNemar p=1.0). PN (motor) was observed 24.5% and 26.5 % in the study and control side, respectively (McNemar p=1.0). No statistically significant difference of primary endpoint was observed between the control side and the study side. For the Pro-CTCAE assessment, there was also no difference between the study and control side both in the grade of numbness (McNemar p=1.0) and the effect for life. (McNemar p=1.0) Conclusions: SG compression therapy was not effective for decreasing the incidence of PTX induced PN. Citation Format: Haruru Kotani, Nanae Horisawa, Kayoko Sugino, Ayumi Kataoka, Yayoi Adachi, Naomi Gondou, Akiyo Yoshimura, Masaya Hattori, Masataka Sawaki, Mitsuo Terada, Hiroji Iwata. A double-blind phase 2 trial of preventative use of surgical gloves for paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-14-25.

Background: Currently, treatment for older breast cancer patients is largely based on data derived from trials enrolling younger patients; thus, the standard of care for older breast cancer patients remains controversial. Aim: To investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and prognosis in older stage II and III breast cancer patients using data from the Japanese Breast Cancer Registry (JBCR). Methods: We reviewed data from the JBCR, a nationwide registry of newly diagnosed and operated primary breast cancer patients in Japan. To clarify those characteristics, we compared clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and prognosis among three groups: older group, patients aged ≥75 years; young-old group, patients aged 65–74 years; post-menopause group, patients aged 55–64 years. Results: In total, we reviewed 56,093 cases of stage II/III breast cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2011 (older: n=12,727; young-old: n=17,860; post-menopause: n=25,506). The estrogen receptor (ER) positivity rate was higher (older vs. young-old vs. post-menopause: 73.3% vs. 72.0% vs. 68.0%) and HER2 positivity rate was lower in the older group than in the other two groups (12.9% vs. 16.8% vs. 23.6%) (p The following table shows the rate of administration of adjuvant systemic therapy according to the ER and HER2 status. Age (years)≥7565–7455–64p-valueER+Chemotherapy10.042.562.9 Nearly half of the older patients (48.3%) who received chemotherapy received either cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-fluorouracil or oral fluorouracil. As for hormone therapy, tamoxifen was used more frequently in the older group than in the young-old and post-menopause groups (16.5% vs. 8.6% vs. 7.2%). The following table shows the results of the 5-year overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) analyses: Conclusions: Chemotherapy was less common in older patients, especially patients with HER2+ or triple negative breast cancer, resulting in worse BCSS. As older patients tend to have several comorbidities, comprehensive geriatric assessment might be helpful in determining systemic therapies for older patients. Age (years)≥7565–7455–64p-valueER+OS/BCSS (%)84.1/94.592.5/96.093.2/94.9 Citation Format: Akimitsu Yamada, Masataka Sawaki, Hiraku Kumamaru, Hiroaki Miyata, Kanako Nakayama, Chikako Shimizu, Mika Miyashita, Naoko Honma, Itaru Endo, Naruto Taira, Shigehira Saji. Systemic therapy for and prognosis of older stage II and III breast cancer patients: Evaluation of data from the Japanese breast cancer registry [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-14-06.

Background: With the rapid aging of the society, breast cancer in elderly people is also increasing. Although it is important to avoid unnecessary toxicity to maintain the quality of life of elderly patients, it is suggested that they are undertreated compared to younger counterparts which leads to poorer outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess the practice of the clinical care for elderly breast cancer patients aged 75 or over, and to explore the factors associated with physicians’ attitude regarding treatment recommendations towards elderly breast cancer patients in Japan. Methods: We conducted an online survey towards 1690 Breast Care Specialists belonging to the Japanese Breast Cancer Society. The respondents were asked to complete a questionnaire including (1) sociodemographic background, (2) hypothetical case scenarios in patients with Stage IIB breast cancer, (3) clinical experience of elderly breast cancer patients, (4) Good Death Inventory (GDI), a measure for evaluating good death from the bereaved family member's perspective and (5) belief regarding cancer treatment for elderly breast cancer patients. We used descriptive statistics to summarize respondents' sociodemographic data. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate differences in proportion. Differences in GDI scores were estimated using Mann-Whitney tests. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software. Results: 508 (30%) physicians responded to the survey. 353 (69.4%) were male. 464 (91.3%) were breast surgeons and 43 (8.4%) were others, including medical oncology, radiology and general surgery. 46 (9%), 115 (22.6%), 284 (55.9%) and 47 (9.3%) belonged to cancer centers, university hospitals, general hospitals and clinics, respectively. 136 (26.8%) of the physicians responded that they have a specialized department or a team which serve for elderly patients in their institutions, whereas 369 (72.6%) answered there was no such support. In questions based on hypothetical case scenarios, significantly more physicians responded that they would not recommend chemotherapy in a 78 year-old with luminal-type breast cancer, good performance status (PS) and no complications compared to a 55 year-old with the same clinical status (p Conclusions: The attitude towards treatment recommendation on adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly breast cancer patients were related to performance status, complications and subtype of the tumor. Physicians’ experience and belief may also affect their attitude. Citation Format: Kanako Nakayama, Chikako Shimizu, Keiko Iino, Shigeaki Watanuki, Masataka Sawaki. Survey on attitude towards treatment recommendations for elderly patients with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-11-16.

Background: The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is accepted as the standard clinical trial to decide a standard therapy, but it remains unclear whether or not elderly patients benefit as much as other patients from participation in an RCT. In the RESPECT study (NCT01104935), the relative value of trastuzumab (H) monotherapy as an adjuvant treatment was compared in an RCT with the standard combination treatment with chemotherapy (H+CT) in patients over 70 years old with HER2-positive invasive breast cancer (BC) who received curative surgery. This cohort study was aimed at comparing prognoses between RCT participants (RCT group) and non-participants (Cohort group). Methods: Patients were divided into RCT participants, and those who did not agree to participate in the RCT despite meeting the eligibility criteria and receiving the explanation given by the investigator. In the RCT group patients were randomized to H or H+CT; in the Cohort group treatment was selected for each patient based on the discretion of the treating physician and the patient's wishes without intervention. Treatment categories were divided into three groups: (1) trastuzumab monotherapy group (cH group), (2) trastuzumab plus chemotherapy group (cH+CT group), and (3) those who received either no therapy at all, or any other anticancer therapies without H (cOther group). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival, safety, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and comprehensive geriatric assessment. Results: A total of 275 patients in the RCT group and 123 patients in the Cohort group, in total 398 patients, were enrolled in this study between October 2009 and October 2014. The median age was 74.0 years in the RCT group, 74.5 years in the Cohort group and the median follow-up time was 4.1 years and 3.2 years, respectively. Patients were classified as Stage I: 41.8%, 42.5%; IIA: 41.5 %, 40.8%; IIB: 13.5%, 13.3%; and IIIA: 1.5%. 3.3%, respectively (P = 0.51), there were no significant differences between the two groups. Treatment categories in the Cohort group were: (1) cH group; 43% (n = 52), (2) cH+CT group; 30% (n = 36), cOther group; 27% (n = 32). The planned analysis showed that DFS at 3 years was 91.4% in the RCT group vs 89.3% in the Cohort group (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.30; 95%CI, 0.72-2.35, P = 0.38). In patients in the cH+CT, cH and cOther group, DFS at 3 years was 92.3%, 89.2% and 82.5%, respectively. DFS in patients in the cH+CT and the cH group was significantly better than that of the cOther group (adjusted HR = 3.79; 95%CI = 1.35-10.64, P = 0.01). DFS in the cH group showed a better tendency compared with cOther (adjusted HR = 2.59; 95%CI, 0.87-7.73, P = 0.08). The incidence of grade 3/4 non-hematological adverse events in the RCT group was relatively higher compared with the Cohort group (18.5% vs 10.8 %, P = 0.05). Conclusion: The prognosis did not vary between the RCT and Cohort groups. H-containing regimens are often chosen for elderly patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. The prognosis of patients who received any H-containing regimen, even H monotherapy, was better than those who were not treated with H. Citation Format: Shinichi Baba, Masataka Sawaki, Yukari Uemura, Tsuyoshi Saito, Kokoro Kobayashi, Hiroaki Kawashima, Michiko Tsuneizumi, Noriko Sagawa, Hiroko Bando, Masato Takahashi, Miki Yamaguchi, Tsutomu Takashima, Takahiro Nakayama, Masahiro Kashiwaba, Toshiro Mizuno, Yutaka Yamamoto, Naruto Taira, Hiroji Iwata, Tatsuya Toyama, Koichiro Tsugawa, Yasuo Ohashi, Hirofumi Mukai. A cohort study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of postoperative adjuvant therapy in HER2-positive elderly breast cancer patients (RESPECT-cohort study) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-14-02.

This study aimed to determine interstitial lung disease (ILD) incidences in patients receiving cancer drug therapies with or without bevacizumab treatment.Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were conducted in January 2021. The main inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials that compared bevacizumab with standard treatment in patients with solid tumors. Cochrane Collaboration's Tool was used for assessing risk-of-bias.Thirteen records involving 7201 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There were 42 ILD events in bevacizumab groups and 72 in control groups. In bevacizumab groups, the odds ratio for ILD was 0.62 (95% CI 0.42-0.92; p = 0.02), which was a significantly lower incidence than the control. This tendency was shown in targeted therapy groups but not in the cytotoxic agent groups.Our data suggest that bevacizumab may reduce the incidence of ILD.

Background Entinostat is an oral inhibitor of class I histone deacetylases intended for endocrine therapy-resistant patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) advanced or metastatic breast cancer (BC). We examined the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of entinostat monotherapy and combined entinostat/exemestane in Japanese patients. Methods This phase 1 study (3 + 3 dose-escalation design) enrolled postmenopausal women with advanced/metastatic HR+ BC previously treated with nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of entinostat monotherapy (3 mg/qw, 5 mg/qw, or 10 mg/q2w) and entinostat+exemestane (5 mg/qw + 25 mg/qd) were assessed. Pharmacokinetics, lysine acetylation (Ac-K), and T-cell activation markers were measured at multiple time points. Results Twelve patients were enrolled. No DLTs or grade 3–5 adverse events (AEs) occurred. Drug-related AEs (≥ 2 patients) during DLT observation were hypophosphatemia, nausea, and platelet count decreased. Six patients (50%) achieved stable disease (SD) for ≥ 6 months, including one treated for > 19 months. Median progression-free survival was 13.9 months (95% CI 1.9–not calculable); median overall survival was not reached. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve and Ac-K in peripheral blood CD19+ B cells increased dose-proportionally. The changing patterns of entinostat concentrations and Ac-K levels were well correlated. T-cell activation markers increased over time; CD69 increased more in patients with SD ≥ 6 months vs. SD Conclusions Entinostat monotherapy and combined entinostat/exemestane were well tolerated in Japanese patients, with no additional safety concerns compared with previous reports. The correlation between pharmacokinetics and Ac-K in peripheral blood CD19+ B cells, and also T-cell activation markers, merits further investigation. Trial registration JAPIC Clinical Trial Information, JapicCTI-153066. Registered 12 November 2015. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02623751. Registered 8 December 2015.

Purpose To gauge the effects of treatment practices on prognosis for all older patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, particularly to determine whether adjuvant trastuzumab alone can offer benefit over no adjuvant therapy. This report accompanies the RESPECT study, a randomized-controlled trial (RCT) comparing trastuzumab monotherapy with trastuzumab-plus-chemotherapy for early HER2-positive breast cancer.Patients and methods Patients who declined the RCT were treated based on the physician’s discretion. We studied the (1) trastuzumab-plus-chemotherapy group, (2) trastuzumab-monotherapy group, and (3) non-trastuzumab group (no therapy or anticancer therapy without trastuzumab). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), which was compared using the propensity-score method.Results We enrolled 398 eligible patients, aged over 70 years, with HER2-positive invasive breast cancer, of whom 275 (69%) were in the RCT, and 123 (31%) were in this cohort group. The median age was 74.5 years. Among cohort group treatment categories were as follows: (1) trastuzumab-plus-chemotherapy group (n = 36, 30%), (2) trastuzumab-monotherapy group (n = 52, 43%), and (3) non-trastuzumab group (n = 32, 27%). A total of 73% of patients received trastuzumab-containing regimens, with or without chemotherapy. The 3-year DFS was 92.3% in the trastuzumab-plus-chemotherapy group, 89.2% in the trastuzumab-monotherapy group, and 82.5% in the non-trastuzumab group. DFS in the non-trastuzumab group was lower than in the trastuzumab-plus-chemotherapy and trastuzumab-monotherapy groups (propensity-adjusted HR: 3.29; 95% CI: 1.15–9.39; P = 0.026). The relapse-free survival in the non-trastuzumab group was lower than in the trastuzumab-plus-chemotherapy and trastuzumab monotherapy groups (propensity-adjusted HR = 7.80; 95% CI: 2.32–26.2, P < 0.0001). Chemotherapy with trastuzumab or trastuzumab monotherapy did not affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at 36 months.Conclusions Trastuzumab-treated patients had better prognoses than patients not treated with trastuzumab without deterioration of HRQoL. Thus, trastuzumab monotherapy can be considered for patients who reject chemotherapy.Trial registration number The protocol was registered on the website of the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN), Japan (protocol ID: UMIN 000028476).

Purpose The sequence of taxanes (T) followed by anthracyclines (A) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been the standard of care for almost 20 years for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). Sequential administration of eribulin (E) following A/T could provide a greater response rate for women with LABC. Methods In this single-arm, multicenter, Phase II prospective study, the patients received 4 cycles of the FEC regimen and 4 cycles of taxane. After the A/T-regimen, 4 cycles of E were administered followed by surgical resection. The primary endpoint was the clinical response rate. Eligible patients were women aged 20 years or older, with histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer, clinical Stage IIIA (T2–3 and N2 only), Stage IIIB, and Stage IIIC, HER2-negative. Results A preplanned interim analysis aimed to validate the trial assumptions was conducted after treatment of 20 patients and demonstrated that clinical progressive disease rates in the E phase were significantly higher (30%) than assumed. Therefore, the Independent Data Monitoring Committee recommended stopping the study. Finally, 53 patients were enrolled, and 26 patients received the A/T/E-regimen. The overall observed clinical response rate (RR) was 73% (19/26); RRs were 77% (20/26) in the AT phase and 23% (6/26) in the E phase. Thirty percent (8/26) of patients had PD in the E phase, 6 of whom had achieved cCR/PR in the AT phase. Reported grade ≥ 3 AEs related to E were neutropenia (42%), white blood cell count decrease (27%), febrile neutropenia (7.6%), weight gain (3.8%), and weight loss (3.8%). Conclusion Sequential administration of eribulin after the A/T-regimen provided no additional effect for LABC patients. Future research should continue to focus on identifying specific molecular biomarkers that can improve response rates.

OBJECTIVE: The RESPECT trial compared 1-year trastuzumab monotherapy with trastuzumab plus standard chemotherapy as a postoperative adjuvant therapy in HER2-positive elderly breast cancer patients. Primary objective of this study was to verify the noninferiority of 1-year trastuzumab monotherapy to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in terms of disease free survival, and the planned analysis showed that the difference of restricted mean survival time between two groups at 3 years was 0.45 months (reported by Sawaki at ASCO2018). This report assesses the patients-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was done at 99 hospitals in Japan. Elderly women (70 to 80 years old) with HER2-positive, stageI-IIIA invasive breast cancer treated by surgery with clear resection margins were randomly assigned to receive either 1-year trastuzumab or 1-year trastuzumab plus standard chemotherapy, stratified by age, hormone-receptor status, pathological lymph node metastasis and institution. Patients completed questionnaires at baseline, 2 months, 1year, and 3 years after protocol treatment started. The primary outcome was global HRQoL assessed using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) total score, and secondary outcomes were chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), anxiety, depression, and subjective happiness. We did the analyses by intention to treat, including patients who completed questionnaires at baseline before start of protocol treatment, and 5point or more change is meaningful in FACT-G total score. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01104935. RESULTS: Between Oct 2009 and Oct 2014, 275 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 9 patients were excluded: 135 assigned to trastuzumab monotherapy and 131 assigned to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy. We detected significant difference between treatment groups for: clinically meaningful HRQoL deterioration rate at 2 months (31% for trastuzumab monotherapy vs 48% for trastuzumab plus chemotherapy; p=0.016) and at 1year (19% vs 38%; p=0.009), clinically meaningful HRQoL improvement rate at 2 months (38% for trastuzumab monotherapy vs 15% for trastuzumab plus chemotherapy; p CONCLUSION: Given the small advantage of adjuvant trastuzumab plus chemotherapy compared to trastuzumab monotherapy for elderly HER-2 positive breast cancer women, decisions about treatment should be informed by the risk for adverse health effects associated with chemotherapy. Citation Format: Kobayashi K, Taira N, Sawaki M, Sagawa N, Baba S, Saito T, Kawahara T, Hagiwara Y, Uemura Y, Shimozuma K, Ohashi Y, Mukai H. Patient-reported outcomes with trastuzumab monotherapy versus trastuzumab plus standard chemotherapy as a postoperative adjuvant therapy in HER2-positive elderly breast cancer patients (RESPECT): A randomized, open-label, phase 3 clinical trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-13-02.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of trastuzumab(Tmab) or chemotherapy on cognitive function has not been fully understood, especially in elderly breast cancer patients. The RESPECT trial compared 1-year(yr) Tmab monotherapy with Tmab plus standard chemotherapy as adjuvant therapy in elderly patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. The primary objective was to verify the noninferiority of 1-yr Tmab monotherapy compared to Tmab plus chemotherapy in terms of disease-free survival, and the planned analysis showed that the difference of restricted mean survival time between two groups at 3 yrs was 0.45 months (Sawaki at ASCO2018). The goal of this report was to assess the impact of the treatment groups on longitudinal cognitive function. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was performed with patients from 99 hospitals in Japan. Elderly women with HER2-positive, stage I-IIIA invasive breast cancer surgery treated with clear resection margins were randomly assigned to either receive 1-yr Tmab or 1-yr Tmab plus standard chemotherapy. 15 institutions participated in the cognitive sub-study. Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at baseline and at 1 and 3 yrs after treatment. The primary outcome was the amount of change in the MMSE score from the baseline. A linear mixed-effects model was used for comparisons of change in the MMSE score between groups, controlling for time and baseline score. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of both suspected mild dementia (MMSE≤27) and dementia (MMSE≤23) at each time point. RESULTS: Between October 2009 and October 2014, 275 patients were enrolled in the RESPECT trial, and 57 patients were enrolled in the cognitive function sub-study with 2 patients subsequently excluded. The 55-patient sub-study comprised 29 patients assigned to the Tmab monotherapy group and 26 patients assigned to the Tmab plus chemotherapy group. Primary analysis revealed that change in the MMSE score was not significantly different between the two groups (difference −0.6 at 1 yr and −0.9 at 3 yrs; p=0.136), whereas the baseline score was the only significant factor that had an effect on the amount of change in the MMSE score (p CONCLUSION: Postoperative chemotherapy for elderly breast cancer patients was considered to have little effect on the onset of dementia during the follow-up period of 3 yrs. Further long-term observation is necessary to obtain a significant conclusion. Citation Format: Takahashi M, Sawaki M, Hagiwara Y, Uemura Y, Kawahara T, Shimozuma K, Ohashi Y, Saito T, Baba S, Kobayashi K, Mukai H, Taira N. Analysis of cognitive function in elderly HER2-positive breast cancer patients receiving either trastuzumab monotherapy or trastuzumab plus chemotherapy as a postoperative adjuvant treatment: A cognitive function sub-study of a randomized, open-label, phase 3 clinical trial (RESPECT trial) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-11-21.

There are little data regarding the overall survival (OS) of patients without adjuvant systemic therapy, because most patients have been subject to standardized systemic therapies. We evaluated the baseline risk to facilitate making decisions about adjuvant therapy. A total of 1835 breast cancer patients who did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy between 1964 and 1992 were retrospectively evaluated. We investigated the 10-year disease-free survival (DFS) and OS according to the number of metastatic lymph nodes, pathological T classification, stage, and estrogen receptor (ER) status. Survival curves showed that as the number of metastatic lymph nodes, pathological T classification, and staging increased, the 10-year OS and DFS decreased. In univariate and multivariable analyses, the number of metastatic lymph nodes was significantly associated with the DFS and OS, while in a univariate analysis, the pathological T classification and stage were significantly associated with the DFS and OS. ER positivity was a good prognostic factor for the 5-year DFS. However, between 6 and 7 years after surgery, ER negativity was a better prognostic factor than ER positivity. We showed survival rates of patients without adjuvant therapy according to TNM classification and ER status. This information can aid in treatment selection for doctors and patients through a shared decision-making approach.

The eighth editions of the primary tumor, lymph node and metastasis classifications for breast cancer issued by the American Joint Commission of Cancer and the Union for International Cancer Control were revised in 2017. The major change made by the American Joint Commission of Cancer is to incorporate biological factors such as estrogen and progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, histological grade and multigene prognostic assays, into the staging system. Tumor biomarkers and low recurrence scores confirmed by multigene prognostic assays change the staging. Minor changes are to add the post-neoadjuvant therapy clinical and pathological classification and to define the size of tumor, lymph node and metastasis components more precisely. Little has changed in the Union for International Cancer Control. We have identified key points of change in both eighth editions of the tumor, lymph node and metastasis classifications and we discuss possible problems which may arise when they are adopted in Japanese practice, as well as future directions.

Purpose Patients with breast cancer may develop cognitive impairment as a result of hormone therapy and aging. This study aimed to describe older patients’ experience of cognitive impairment related to hormone therapy for breast cancer. Methods A qualitative and descriptive design was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted for 11 patients to ask about their experience in daily life related to their cognitive impairment. Study participants were evaluated by cancer-specific geriatric assessment. Inductive content analysis was conducted using interview records. Results Three themes emerged from the patients’ narrative data: recognizing of cognitive impairments, impacts on mental health, and coping with cognitive impairments. Recognizing of cognitive function consisted of two categories: perception of cognitive changes and acknowledging their cognitive function status through interacting with others. Impacts on mental health consisted of six categories: decreased motivation for social activities, upset by perception of cognitive decline, concerns about impacts of cognitive impairment on treatment of breast cancer, concerns about care burden of their family, concerns about progressing of cognitive impairments, and feeling secure that their cognitive impairment is not unusual. Coping with cognitive impairments consisted of two categories: coping with problems related to cognitive impairment and trying to maintain and improve cognitive function. Conclusion Medical professionals should perform a comprehensive evaluation of older patients receiving hormone therapy for breast cancer.

This study aimed at investigating the real-world prognostic impact of systemic treatment in older patients with stage II/III breast cancer (BC)., This retrospective cohort study included patients with stage II/III primary BC, aged ≥55 years, and registered in the Japanese Breast Cancer Registry from 2004 to 2011. The clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and prognosis of patients aged ≥75 years (older) were compared to those of younger patients., In total, 56,093 patients (12,727, ≥75 years; 17,860, 65-74 years; 25,506, 55-64 years) were enrolled. In the older group, 9.2% with a luminal (hormone receptor [HR]+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2]-), 32.9% with a triple-negative (TN, HR-/HER2-), and 27.4% with a HER2-positive (any-HR/HER2+) receptor were administered chemotherapy. In those with luminal cancer, the 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was approximately 95% in all age groups. Meanwhile, among those with TN and HER2-positive BC, the older group had a poorer BCSS. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was also poorer in the older group across all subtypes. Among older patients matched using clinicopathological factors, chemotherapy use was associated with improved OS in the luminal and HER2-positive subtypes., Chemotherapy use was lower among older patients with stage II/III breast cancer. Those with TN and HER2-positive BC had a lower BCSS than their younger counterparts. Chemotherapy may be beneficial in improving the OS in older patients with luminal and HER2-positive BCs. Treatment for older patients should be individualized, based on tumor-related factors, quality of life, and the patient's health status.