Search

Physiologically, people age at different rates, which leads to a discrepancy between physiological and chronological age. Physiological age should be a priority when considering the indications for adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. The primary objective of this study was to determine the characteristics of the postoperative course, surgical outcomes, and complication rates to extend the healthy life expectancy of older ASD patients (≥ 75 years). The secondary objective was to clarify the importance of physiological age in the surgical treatment of older ASD patients, considering frailty.A retrospective review of 109 consecutive patients aged ≥ 65 years with symptomatic ASD who underwent a corrective long fusion with lateral interbody fusion from the lower thoracic spine to the pelvis from 2015 to 2019 was conducted. Patients were classified into two groups according to age (group Y [65-74 years], group O [≥ 75 years]) and further divided into four groups according to the ASD-frailty index score (Y-F, Y-NF, O-F, and O-NF groups). To account for potential risk factors for perioperative course characteristics, complication rates, and surgical outcomes, patients from the database were subjected to propensity score matching based on sex, BMI, and preoperative sagittal spinal alignment (C7 sagittal vertical axis, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis, and pelvic tilt). Clinical outcomes were evaluated 2 years postoperatively, using three patient-reported outcome measures of health-related quality of life: the Oswestry Disability Index, Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire (SRS-22), and Short Form 36 (SF-36). Additionally, the postoperative time-to-first ambulation, as well as minor, major, and mechanical complications, were evaluated.In the comparison between Y and O groups, patients in group O were at a higher risk of minor complications (delirium and urinary tract infection). In contrast, other surgical outcomes of group O were comparable to those of group Y, except for SRS-22 (satisfaction) and time to ambulation after surgery, with better outcomes in Group O. Patients in the O-NF group had better postoperative outcomes (time to ambulation after surgery, SRS-22 (function, self-image, satisfaction), SF-36 [PCS]) than those in the Y-F group.Older age warrants monitoring of minor complications in the postoperative management of patients. However, the outcomes of ASD surgery depended more on frailty than on chronological age. Older ASD patients without frailty might tolerate corrective surgery and have satisfactory outcomes when minimally invasive techniques are used. Physiological age is more important than chronological age when determining the indications for surgery in older patients with ASD.

To assess the complications and mortality in elderly individuals with cervical spine injuries.This retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in a rural area in Japan. Data sets from the trauma registry (January 2011 to March 2018) were analyzed. Patients with cervical spine injury were divided into those aged ≥ 65 years (group Y) and65 years (group E). We then analyzed age, sex, 30-day mortality, hospital stay, level of cervical spine injury, presence of cervical vertebral fracture, perioperative complications (pneumonia, urinary tract infection, and severe bedsore), neurological deficit (Frankel classification), Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score, and Injury Severity Score (ISS).We evaluated a total of 398 patients; among them, 177 were included in group Y and 221 in group E. The assessed parameters were as follows: age (group Y/E; 48.7/75.9 years), men (78.0/72.3%), 30-day mortality (8.5/10.0%, p = 0.159), hospital stay (17.2/19.1 days, p = 0.36), level of cervical spine injury (C1 [5.7/4.5%], C2 [12.4/15.8%], C3 [10.2/17.2%], C4 [14.1/16.3%], C5 [26.6/22.2%], C6 [22.0/12.2%], and C7 [11.3/10.9%]), vertebral fracture (56.6/61.9%), central cord syndrome (36.2/33%), operation (18.6/13.1%), pneumonia (6.8/11.8%, p = 0.077), urinary tract infection (4.0/6.3%, p = 0.26), severe bedsore (0/1.8%, p = 0.068), Frankel classification (grade A [5.7/6.3%], grade B [6.8/7.7%], grade C [24.9/28.5%], grade D [17.5/11.8%], and grade E [34.5/33.9%]), mean AIS score in the cervical spine (3.3/3.5, p = 0.04), and mean ISS (23.2/22.2, p = 0.38). C3 injuries tended to be higher in group E.Mortality and morbidity associated with cervical spine injuries did not differ between younger and older patients. Nevertheless, vigilance is required for the detection of C3 injury in elderly individuals.

Background The latest clinical guidelines are mandatory for physicians to follow when practicing evidence-based medicine in the treatment of low back pain. Those guidelines should target not only Japanese board-certified orthopaedic surgeons, but also primary physicians, and they should be prepared based entirely on evidence-based medicine. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Low Back Pain guideline committee decided to update the guideline and launched the formulation committee. The purpose of this study was to describe the formulation we implemented for the revision of the guideline with the latest data of evidence-based medicine. Methods The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Low Back Pain guideline formulation committee revised the previous guideline based on a method for preparing clinical guidelines in Japan proposed by Medical Information Network Distribution Service Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development 2014. Two key phrases, "body of evidence" and "benefit and harm balance" were focused on in the revised version. Background and clinical questions were determined, followed by literature search related to each question. Appropriate articles were selected from all the searched literature. Structured abstracts were prepared, and then meta-analyses were performed. The strength of both the body of evidence and the recommendation was decided by the committee members. Results Nine background and nine clinical qvuestions were determined. For each clinical question, outcomes from the literature were collected and meta-analysis was performed. Answers and explanations were described for each clinical question, and the strength of the recommendation was decided. For background questions, the recommendations were described based on previous literature. Conclusions The 2019 clinical practice guideline for the management of low back pain was completed according to the latest evidence-based medicine. We strongly hope that this guideline serves as a benchmark for all physicians, as well as patients, in the management of low back pain.

Background Selection of operative method for lumbar spinal stenosis with Meyerding grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis remains controversial and the preoperative factors affecting the patient-reported postoperative assessment are unknown. The objective of this study was to clarify the preoperative factors affecting the two-year postoperative outcome in Meyerding grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis by using a patient-reported assessment. Methods Seventy-two consecutive patients who had decompression alone (D group; 28) or with fusion (DF group; 44) were enrolled. The parameters investigated were the Japanese Orthopaedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire, visual analog scales, and radiological evaluation of L4 slippage (L4S), lumbar lordosis (LL), and lumbar axis sacral distance (LASD) as an index of sagittal alignment. The prospectively collected data of postoperative 2 years were examined by statistical analysis. Results Finally, sixty-two cases (D group; 25, DF group; 37) were evaluated. There was no significant difference in JOABPEQ outcome between the two surgical groups. On the other hand, in multiple logistic regression analysis, gender, preoperative L4S, LASD, and LL were extracted as significant preoperative factors affecting the two-year postoperative outcome. Women had a lower rate of improvement in lumbar spine dysfunction due to low back pain (risk ratio = 0.17, p = 0.034) and psychological disability (risk ratio = 0.222, p = 0.045) compared to men. Patients with preoperative L4S greater than 5–6 mm have a lower rate of improvement in low back pain (risk ratio = 0.159, p = 0.049) and lumbar spine dysfunction due to low back pain (risk ratio = 0.188, p = 0.043). Patients with a preoperative LASD greater than 30 mm have a higher rate of improvement in postoperative low back pain (risk ratio = 20.905, p = 0.008) and lumbar dysfunction due to low back pain (risk ratio = 11.48, p = 0.021). Preoperative LL of less than 35 degrees was associated with a lower rate of improvement in gait disturbance due to low back pain (risk ratio of high lordosis to low lordosis = 11.638, p = 0.017). Conclusions In this study, the selection of operative method was not a significant factor affecting the two-year postoperative outcome and gender, preoperative L4S, LASD, and LL were extracted as significant preoperative factors.

Kitchen elbow sign (KE-Sign) is a skin abnormality on the extensor side of the elbow and forearm that is often observed in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). The significance of KE-Sign in surgical cases was investigated. Overall, 114 patients with ASD treated with long spinal fusion were reviewed and divided into KE-Sign positive and negative groups. The preoperative and 1-year follow-up evaluations included radiographic parameters [C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI) and lumbar lordosis (LL)], the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scales (VASs) for low back pain, leg pain, and satisfaction, and Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36). Multi-regression analysis was performed to identify patient satisfaction predictors and improvement in the ODI as dependent variables and preoperative background factors as independent variables. Preoperative characteristics showed no significant difference between both groups. Improvement in the ODI and VAS for satisfaction were significantly superior in the KE-Sign positive group. In multiple regression analysis, KE-Sign and preoperative ODI were significantly associated with improvement in the ODI; age, KE-Sign, preoperative low back pain VAS, and leg pain VAS were significantly associated with satisfaction. KE-Sign can be a predictor of better surgical outcomes in ASD patients.

Spinal fusion surgery is often performed with pelvic fixation to prevent distal junctional kyphosis. The inclusion of spinopelvic fixation has been reported to induce progression of hip joint arthropathy in a radiographic follow-up study. However, its biomechanical mechanism has not yet been elucidated. This study aimed to compare the changes in hip joint moment before and after spinal fusion surgery.This study was an observational study and included nine patients (eight women and one man) who were scheduled to undergo spinopelvic fusion surgery. We calculated the three-dimensional external joint moments of the hip during gait, standing, and climbing stairs before and 1 year after surgery.During gait, the maximum extension moment was 0.51 ± 0.29 and 0.63 ± 0.40 before and after spinopelvic fusion surgery (p = 0.011), and maximum abduction moment was 0.60 ± 0.33 and 0.83 ± 0.34 before and after surgery (p = 0.004), respectively. During standing, maximum extension moment was 0.76 ± 0.32 and 1.04 ± 0.21 before and after spinopelvic fusion surgery (p = 0.0026), and maximum abduction moment was 0.12 ± 0.20 and 0.36 ± 0.22 before and after surgery (p = 0.0005), respectively. During climbing stairs, maximum extension moment was - 0.31 ± 0.30 and - 0.48 ± 0.15 before and after spinopelvic fusion surgery (p = 0.040), and maximum abduction moment was 0.023 ± 0.18 and - 0.02 ± 0.13 before and after surgery (p = 0.038), respectively.This study revealed that hip joint flexion-extension and abduction-adduction moments increased after spinopelvic fixation surgery in the postures of standing, walking, and climbing stairs. The mechanism was considered to be adjacent joint disease after spinopelvic fusion surgery including sacroiliac joint fixation.

ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine the feasibility of ultrasonography (US) in the assessment of cervical vertebral artery (VA) injury compared with computed tomography angiography (CTA) in the emergency room.MethodsA total of 50 VAs from 25 consecutive patients with cervical spine injury admitted to the emergency room in our hospital were analyzed in this study. US and CTA were performed to assess the VA in patients with cervical spine injury, and the sensitivity and specificity of US for CTA was clarified.ResultsThe agreement between US and CTA was 98% (49/50) with 0.92 Cohen's Kappa index. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of US were 100%, 97.7%, 85.7%, and 100%, respectively.ConclusionsUS had a sensitivity of 100% compared with CTA in assessment of the VA. It can be used as an initial screening test for VA injury in the emergency room.

An intraoperative functional spinal cord monitoring system is a technology used by spine and spinal cord surgeons to perform a safe surgery and to gain further surgical proficiency. However, no existing clinical neurophysiological method used in the operating room can monitor all complex spinal cord functions. Therefore, by observing the activities of certain neural action potentials transferred via limited neural tissues, surgeons need to deductively estimate the function of the whole spinal cord. Thus, as the number of spinal cord functions that need to be observed increases, spinal cord monitoring can be more reliable. However, in some situations, critical decision-making is affected by the limited capability of these methods. Nevertheless, good teamwork enables sharing of seamless information within the team composed of a surgeon, anesthesiologist, monitoring technician and nurses greatly contributes to making quick and accurate decisions. The surgeon, who is the person in charge of the team, should communicate with multidisciplinary team members using common technical terms. For this reason, spine and spinal cord surgeons must have appropriate knowledge of the methods currently used, especially of their utility and limitations. To date, at least six electrophysiological methods are available for clinical utilization: three are used to monitor sensory-related tracts, and three are used to monitor motor-related spinal cord functions. If surgeons perform electrode setting, utilizing their expertise, then the range of available methods is broadened, and more meticulous intraoperative functional spinal cord monitoring can be carried out. Furthermore, if the team members share information effectively by utilizing a clinically feasible judicious checklist or tools, then spinal cord monitoring will be more reliable.

Recently, the number of adult spinal deformity surgeries including sacroiliac joint fixation (SIJF) by using an S2 alar iliac screw or iliac screw has increased to avoid the distal junctional failure. However, we occasionally experienced patients who suffered from hip pain after a long instrumented spinal fusion. We hypothesized that long spinal fusion surgery including SIJF influenced the hip joint as an adjacent joint. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the association between spinal deformity surgery including SIJF and radiographic progression of hip osteoarthritis (OA). This study was retrospective cohort study. In total, 118 patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery at single center from January 2013 to August 2018 were included. We measured joint space width (JSW) at central space of the hip joint. We defined reduction of more than 0.5 mm/year in JSW as hip OA progression. The patients were divided into two groups depending on either a progression of hip osteoarthritis (Group P), or no progression (Group N). The number of patients in Group P and Group N was 47 and 71, respectively. Factor that was statistically significant for hip OA was SIJF (p = 0.0065, odds ratio = 7.1, 95% confidence interval = 1.6–31.6). There were no other significant differences by the multiple logistic regression analysis. This study identified spinal fixation surgery that includes SIJF as a predictor for radiographic progression of hip OA over 12 months. We should pay attention to hip joint lesions after adult spinal deformity surgery, including SIJF.

OBJECTIVEFacet cysts may represent a sign of intrinsic facet disease and instability, increasing the importance of less-invasive approaches that limit tissue dissection and improve visualization. The authors developed an intraoperative cyst-dyeing technique, involving the injection of indigo carmine from the facet joint into the cyst, as an adjunct during decompression. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and perioperative complication rates of microendoscopic spinal decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS), caused by facet cysts and to elucidate the efficacy of the cyst-dyeing method in microendoscopic surgery for facet cysts.METHODSForty-eight consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment with microendoscopic decompression for symptomatic LSS or LFS caused by facet cysts from 2011 to 2018 were reviewed. These patients were divided into two groups: a group that did not receive dye (N), with the patients undergoing surgery from April 2011 to May 2015; and a group that received dye (D), with patients undergoing surgery from June 2015 to March 2018. The authors evaluated the operative time, blood loss, perioperative complications, visual analog scale scores for low-back and leg pain, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores. Surgical outcome was evaluated 2 years postoperatively and was compared between groups D and N.RESULTSThe clinical outcomes were generally excellent or good. Group N consisted of 36 patients and group D of 12 patients. Comparing the clinical results, it was found that the cyst-dyeing method reduced the perioperative complication rate, including reduction in dural tears to 0%, and shortened the average operative time by approximately 40 minutes.CONCLUSIONSIn this study, the authors demonstrated that the clinical outcomes of microendoscopic spinal decompression in patients with LSS or LFS caused by facet-joint cysts are generally favorable. Additionally, the adjunctive cyst-dyeing method effectively delineated the cystic and dural boundaries, facilitating safer and more effective cyst separation and neural decompression. Microendoscopic surgery combined with this novel facet cyst-dyeing method is a safe and effective minimally invasive technique for facet-joint cysts.

OBJECTIVEVarious surgical treatments have been reported for vertebral pseudarthrosis after osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF). However, the outcomes are not always good. The authors now have some experience with combined anterior-posterior short-segment spinal fusion (1 level above and 1 level below the fracture) using a wide-foot-plate expandable cage. Here, they report their surgical outcomes with this procedure.METHODSBetween June 2016 and August 2018, 16 consecutive patients (4 male and 12 female; mean age 75.1 years) underwent short-segment spinal fusion for vertebral pseudarthrosis or delayed collapse after OVF. The mean observation period was 20.1 months. The level of the fractured vertebra was T12 in 4 patients, L1 in 3, L2 in 4, L3 in 3, and L4 in 2. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the lumbar Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale and 100-mm visual analog scale for low-back pain. Local kyphotic angle, intervertebral height, bone union rate, and instrumentation-related adverse events were investigated as imaging outcomes. The data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.RESULTSThe mean operating time was 334.3 minutes (range 256–517 minutes), and the mean blood loss was 424.9 ml (range 30–1320 ml). The only perioperative complication was a superficial infection of the posterior wound that was cured by irrigation. The lumbar JOA score and visual analog scale value improved from 11.2 and 58.8 mm preoperatively to 20.6 and 18.6 mm postoperatively, respectively. The mean local kyphotic angle and mean intervertebral height were 22.6° and 28.0 mm, respectively, before surgery, −1.5° and 40.5 mm immediately after surgery, and 7.0° and 37.1 mm at the final observation. Significant improvement was observed in both parameters immediately after surgery and at the final observation when compared with the preoperative values. Intraoperative endplate injury occurred in 8 cases, and progression of cage subsidence of 5 mm or more was observed in 2 of these cases. Proximal junctional kyphosis was observed in 2 cases. There were no cases of screw loosening. No cases required reoperation due to instrument-related adverse events. Bone union was observed in all 14 cases that had CT evaluation.CONCLUSIONSThis short-segment fusion procedure is relatively minimally invasive, and local reconstruction and bone fusion have been achieved. This procedure is considered to be attempted for the surgical treatment of osteoporotic vertebral pseudarthrosis after OVF.

Increased signal intensity (ISI) is usually recognized at the disc level of the responsible lesion in the patients with cervical myelopathy. However, it is occasionally seen at the vertebral body level, below the level of compression. We aimed to investigate the clinical significance and the radiographic characteristics of ISI at the vertebral body level.This retrospective study included 135 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent surgery and with local ISI. We measured the local and C2-7 angle at flexion, neutral, and extension. We also evaluated the local range of motion (ROM) and C2-7 ROM. The patients were classified into group D (ISI at disc level) and group B (ISI at vertebral body level).The prevalence was 80.7% (109/135) and 19.3% (26/135) for groups D and B, respectively. Local angle at flexion and neutral were more kyphotic in group B than in group D. The local ROM was larger in group B than in group D. Moreover, C2-7 angle at flexion, neutral and extension were more kyphotic in group B than in group D. Two years later, local angle at flexion, neutral, and extension were also kyphotic in group B than group D; however, local and C2-7 ROM was not significantly different between the two groups. There was no significant difference of clinical outcomes 2 years postoperatively between both groups.Group B was associated with the kyphotic alignment and local greater ROM, compared to group D. As the spinal cord is withdrawn in flexion, the ISI lesion at vertebral body might be displaced towards the disc level, which impacted by the anterior components of the vertebrae. ISI at the vertebral body level might be related to cord compression or stretching at flexion position. This should be different from the conventionally held pincer-mechanism concept.

OBJECTIVEPersistent lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) is one of the most common reasons for poor postoperative outcomes and is a major contributor to “failed back surgery syndrome.” The authors describe a new surgical strategy for LFS based on anatomical considerations using 3D image fusion with MRI/CT analysis.METHODSA retrospective review was conducted on 78 consecutive patients surgically treated for LFS at the lumbosacral junction (2013–2017). The location and extent of stenosis, including the narrowest site and associated pathology (bone or soft tissue), were measured using 3D image fusion with MRI/CT. Stenosis was defined as medial intervertebral foraminal (MF; inner edge to pedicle center), lateral intervertebral foraminal (LF; pedicle center to outer edge), or extraforaminal (EF; outside the pedicle). Lumbar (low-back pain, leg pain) and patient satisfaction visual analog scale (VAS) scores and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were evaluated. Surgical outcome was evaluated 2 years postoperatively.RESULTSMost instances of stenosis existed outside the pedicle’s center (94%), including LF (58%), EF (36%), and MF (6%). In all MF cases, stenosis resulted from soft-tissue structures. The narrowest stenosis sites were localized around the pedicle’s outer border. The areas for sufficient nerve decompression were extended in MF+LF (10%), MF+LF+EF (14%), LF+EF (39%), LF (11%), and EF (26%). No iatrogenic pars interarticularis damage occurred. The JOA score was 14.9 ± 2.6 points preoperatively and 22.4 ± 3.5 points at 2 years postoperatively. The JOA recovery rate was 56.0% ± 18.6%. The VAS score (low-back and leg pain) was significantly improved 2 years postoperatively (p < 0.01). According to patients’ self-assessment of the minimally invasive surgery, 62 (79.5%) chose “surgery met my expectations” at follow-up. Nine patients (11.5%) selected “I did not improve as much as I had hoped but I would undergo the same surgery for the same outcome.”CONCLUSIONSMost LFS existed outside the pedicle’s center and was rarely noted in the pars region. The main regions of stenosis were localized to the pedicle’s outer edge. Considering this anatomical distribution of LFS, the authors recommend that lateral fenestration should be the first priority for foraminal decompression. Other surgical options including foraminotomy, total facetectomy, and hemilaminectomy likely require more bone resections than LFS treatment. The microendoscopic surgery results were very good, indicating that this minimally invasive surgery was suitable for treating this disease.

Adult spinal fusion surgery improves lumbar alignment and patient satisfaction. Adult spinal deformity surgery improves saggital balance not only lumbar lesion, but also at hip joint coverage. It was expected that hip joint coverage rate was improved and joint stress decreased. However, it was reported that adjacent joint disease at hip joint was induced by adult spinal fusion surgery including sacroiliac joint fixation on an X-ray study. The mechanism is still unclear. We aimed to investigate the association between lumbosacral fusion including sacroiliac joint fixation and contact stress of the hip joint.A 40-year-old woman with intact lumbar vertebrae underwent computed tomography. A three-dimensional nonlinear finite element model was constructed from the L4 vertebra to the femoral bone with triangular shell elements (thickness, 2 mm; size, 3 mm) for the cortical bone's outer surface and 2-mm (lumbar spine) or 3-mm (femoral bone) tetrahedral solid elements for the remaining bone. We constructed the following four models: a non-fusion model (NF), a L4-5 fusion model (L5F), a L4-S1 fusion model (S1F), and a L4-S2 alar iliac screw fixation model (S2F). A compressive load of 400 N was applied vertically to the L4 vertebra and a 10-Nm bending moment was additionally applied to the L4 vertebra to stimulate flexion, extension, left lateral bending, and axial rotation. Each model's hip joint's von Mises stress and angular motion were analyzed.The hip joint's angular motion in NF, L5F, S1F, and S2F gradually increased; the S2F model presented the greatest angular motion.The average and maximum contact stress of the hip joint was the highest in the S2F model. Thus, lumbosacral fusion surgery with sacroiliac joint fixation placed added stress on the hip joint. We propose that this was a consequence of adjacent joint spinopelvic fixation. Lumbar-to-pelvic fixation increases the angular motion and stress at the hip joint.

Background Although there are reports on the effectiveness of microendoscopic laminotomy using a spinal endoscope as decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, predicting the improvement of low back pain (LBP) still poses a challenge, and no clear index has been established. This study aimed to investigate whether microendoscopic laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis improves low back pain and determine the preoperative predictors of residual LBP. Methods In this single-center retrospective study, we examined 202 consecutive patients who underwent microendoscopic laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis with a preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score for LBP of ≥40 mm. The lumbar spine Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), and VAS scores for LBP, leg pain (LP), and leg numbness (LN) were examined before and at 1 year after surgery. Patients with a 1-year postoperative LBP-VAS of ≥25 mm composed the residual LBP group. The preoperative predictive factors associated with postoperative residual LBP were analyzed. Results JOA scores improved from 14.1 preoperatively to 20.2 postoperatively (p p p p p = 0.005), preoperative VAS for LBP ≥ 70 mm (OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.17–4.08; p = 0.014), and female sex (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.09–3.89; p = 0.047) were preoperative predictors of residual LBP. Conclusion Microendoscopic decompression surgery had an ameliorating effect on LBP in lumbar spinal stenosis. Modic type 1 change, preoperative VAS for LBP, and female sex were predictors of postoperative residual LBP, which may be a useful index for surgical procedure selection.

Studies have suggested a relationship between sagittal spinal malalignment and low back pain (LBP). The current study investigated the relationship of spinal alignment with LBP and physical performance in 1491 individuals who attended the second follow-up visit of the Wakayama Spine Study. The sagittal vertical axis at C7 (C7 SVA) was measured by a spine surgeon. The occurrence of LBP within one month, pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and physical performance (grip strength, 6-m walking time, chair stand test, one-leg standing test) were also evaluated. LBP in the previous month was determined using ODI, and indicators of physical performance were measured. The mean C7 SVA was 11.0 ± 42.7 mm and was significantly greater in older participants (p p p p p

Long-term clinical outcomes of microendoscopic laminotomy (MEL) for patients with multilevel radiographic lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSS) have not been widely explored. The clinical significance and natural progression of additional untreated levels (e.g., remaining radiographic (RR)-LSS not addressed by selective MEL) remain unknown. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes of selective MEL in LSS patients and compare outcomes between patients with and without remaining RR-LSS to determine the efficacy of this procedure.Forty-nine patients at a single center underwent posterior spinal microendoscopic decompression surgery for neurogenic claudication or radicular leg pain in moderate-to-severe spinal stenosis. The patients were categorized into the RR-LSS-positive and RR-LSS-negative cohorts based on unaddressed levels of stenosis. Pre-operative and 10-year follow-up evaluations, including the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score for low back pain and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and satisfaction, were compared between the groups. Additionally, the need for reoperation was determined.MEL significantly improved JOA scores, lumbar VAS, and ODI over the 10-year postoperative period. Pre-operative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were not significantly different between the cohorts. Overall, 18.4% (9/49) of patients required reoperation during the follow-up period. The reoperation rate in the RR-LSS-positive (13.8%; 4/29) group was similar to that in the RR-LL-negative (15.0%; 3/20) group.MEL is effective for lumbar stenosis, with improved clinical outcomes up to 10 years following surgery. Selective MEL, addressing only symptomatic levels in multilevel stenosis, with residual remaining lumbar stenosis, is similarly effective without increased reoperation rates. Surgeons may consider more limited selective decompression in patients with multilevel stenosis, avoiding the risk and invasiveness of extensive procedures.Level III.

This prospective study aimed to determine the association between radiographic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) and the quality of life (QOL) in the general Japanese population.The severity of radiographic LSS was qualitatively graded on axial magnetic resonance images as follows: no stenosis, mild stenosis with ≤1/3 narrowing, moderate stenosis with a narrowing between 1/3 and 2/3, and severe stenosis with2/3 narrowing. Patients less than 40 years of age and those who had undergone previous lumbar spine surgery were excluded from the study. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which includes 10 sections, was used to assess the QOL. One-way analysis of variance was performed to determine the statistical relationship between radiographic LSS and ODI. Further, logistic regression analysis adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index was performed to detect the relationship.Complete data were available for 907 patients (300 men and 607 women; mean age, 67.3±12.4 years). The prevalence of severe, moderate, and non-mild/non-radiographic were 30%, 48%, and 22%, respectively. In addition, the mean values of ODI in each group were 12.9%, 13.1%, and 11.7%, respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups in logistic analysis (P = 0.55). In addition, no significant differences in any section of the ODI were observed among the groups. However, severe radiographic LSS was associated with low back pain in the "severe" group as determined by logistic analysis adjusted for gender, age, and body mass index (odds ratio: 1.53, confidence interval: 1.13-2.07) compared with the non-severe group.In this general population study, severe radiographic LSS was associated with low back pain (LBP), but did not affect ODI.

Sacroiliac joint pain (SIJP) is one of the pathological conditions of adjacent segment disorders occurring after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that even in ASD surgery using S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screws, SIJP can develop much earlier than reported previously and can be rescued by ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint block.Overall, 94 patients with ASD treated with long spinal fusion using S2AI screws were prospectively investigated for SIJP postoperatively, and the effect of ultrasound-guided sacroiliac joint block was evaluated. Additionally, the relationship between the symptomatic side of the SIJP and the surgical procedure; the preoperative and postoperative whole-spine sagittal and coronal alignment, lumbar pelvis sagittal plane alignment, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis were retrospectively compared between the groups with and without SIJP.Eleven of 94 cases (11.7%) developed SIJP. The average onset was 12.0 (±6.2) days after surgery. The "one-finger test," "Gaenslen test," and "tenderness of the posterosuperior iliac spine" had high positivity rates for SIJP. Night pain occurred in 81.8% of patients and was one of the diagnostic features. There were no significant relationships between the symptomatic side of SIJP and the approach-side of lumbar interbody fusion, donor site of the iliac bone graft, or malposition of the S2AI screw. There were no significant differences in preoperative characteristics and radiological parameters between the SIJP-positive and -negative groups preoperatively, postoperatively, or in postoperative changes. Two of the 11 cases required the SIJ block four times, but all patients eventually achieved70% pain relief with no recurrence.For good pain control and physical therapy, the fact that early buttock-groin pain after spinal fusion surgery has a 12% likelihood of being due to SIJP and can be relieved with the ultrasound-guided SIJ block is clinically important for diagnosis and pain management.

Background Lateral interbody release (LIR) via a transpsoas lateral approach is a surgical strategy to address degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) patients with anterior autofusion of vertebral segments. This study aimed to characterize the clinical and radiographic outcomes of this lumbar reconstruction strategy using LIR to achieve anterior column correction. Methods Data for 21 fused vertebrae in 17 consecutive patients who underwent LIR between January 2014 and March 2020 were reviewed. Demographic and intraoperative data were recorded. Radiographic parameters were assessed preoperatively and at final follow-up, including segmental lordotic angle (SLA), segmental coronal angle (SCA), bone union rate, pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt, sacral slope, PI-LL mismatch, sagittal vertical axis, Cobb angle, and deviation of the C7 plumb line from the central sacral vertical line. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) scores for low back and leg pain, and the short form 36 health survey questionnaire (SF-36) postoperatively and at final follow-up. Complications were also assessed. Results Mean patient age was 70.3 ± 4.8 years and all patients were female. Average follow-up period was 28.4 ± 15.3 months. Average procedural time to perform LIR was 21.3 ± 9.7 min and was not significantly different from traditional lateral interbody fusion at other levels. Blood loss per single segment during LIR was 38.7 ± 53.2 mL. Fusion rate was 100.0% in this cohort. SLA improved significantly from − 7.6 ± 9.2 degrees preoperatively to 7.0 ± 8.8 degrees at final observation and SCA improved significantly from 19.1 ± 7.8 degrees preoperatively to 8.7 ± 5.9 degrees at final observation (P Conclusions The LIR technique for anterior column realignment of fused vertebrae in the context of severe ASD may be an option of a safe and effective surgical strategy.

Studies have suggested a relationship between sagittal malalignment of the spine and low back pain (LBP). The Wakayama Spine Study investigated the relationship between spinal alignment, LBP, and physical performance in 1491 individuals who attended a second follow-up visit as part of the ROAD Study and for whom standing lateral spinal radiographs were available. The sagittal vertical axis at C7 (C7 SVA) was measured by a spinal surgeon. LBP in the previous month was determined by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and indicators of physical performance were measured. The mean C7 SVA was 11.0 ± 42.7 mm and significantly greater in older subjects (p

This study was a retrospective subgroup analysis of prospective cohort data.The main objectives of this study were to develop a classification of degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and concurrent lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) based on pathologic stage, and to determine how these subtypes of DS affect outcomes for minimally invasive (MIS) decompression SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:: DS with LSS is a common clinical scenario, yet there is no consensus on optimal treatment. Natural history of DS is described as early degenerative damage, followed by instability, and eventual restabilization via spondylotic changes. MIS decompression surgery has become increasingly popular, but the effect of DS subtypes on clinical outcomes after MIS decompression is unknown.From 2008 to 2013, all patients who underwent microendoscopic laminotomy for single-level LSS with DS were included. In total, 218 patients (91 male, 127 female individuals) were reviewed. DS pathologic staging was defined as early, advanced, or end stage, based on percent slippage (10% slippage), degree of dynamic instability (3 mm), and disc height. The following variables were evaluated preoperatively and2 years postoperatively and compared among groups: Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, JOA recovery rate, and Visual Analog Scale low back pain.In total, 173 patients were included in final analysis. Final follow-up period was 2.3 years. Average JOA recovery rate was 63.8%. There were no significant differences in JOA recovery and Visual Analog Scale among 3 DS stages (P0.05). In total, 9.8% of patients required additional spine surgery, with 5% requiring subsequent fusion. All patients who required subsequent fusion were in the advanced stage DS group.Microendoscopic decompression is an effective treatment for patients with DS and concurrent LSS, with only 5% of patients requiring subsequent fusion at over 2-year follow-up, and another 5% requiring revision or adjacent segment decompression. The advanced stage DS group, indicating a10% anterolisthesis and/or3 mm of dynamic instability, was more likely to require additional surgery.

Background Utilization of a cage with a large footprint in lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) for the treatment of spondylolisthesis leads to a high fusion rate and neurological improvement owing to the indirect decompression effect and excellent alignment correction. However, if an interbody space is too narrow for insertion of an LLIF cage for cases of spondylolisthesis of Meyerding grade II or higher, LLIF cannot be used. Therefore, we developed a novel strategy, LLIF after reduction by the percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) insertion system in the lateral position (LIFARL), for surgeons to perform accurate and safe LLIF with PPS in patients with such pathology. This study aimed to introduce the new surgical strategy and to present preliminary clinical and radiological results of patients with spondylolisthesis of Meyerding grade II. Methods Six consecutive patients (four men and two women; mean age, 72.7 years-old; mean follow-up period, 15.3 months) with L4 spondylolisthesis of Meyerding grade II were included. Regarding the surgical procedure, first, PPSs were inserted into the L4 and L5 vertebrae fluoroscopically, and both rods were placed in the lateral position. The L5 set screws were fixed tightly, and the L4 side of the rod was floated. Second, the L4 vertebra was reduced by fastening the L4 set screws so that they expanded the anteroposterior width of the interbody space. At that time, the L4 set screws were not fully tightened to the rods to prevent the endplate injury. Finally, the LLIF procedure was started. After inserting the cage, a compression force was added to the PPSs, and the L4 set screws were completely fastened. Results The mean operative time was 183 min, and the mean blood loss was 90.8 mL. All cages were positioned properly. Visual analog scale score and Oswestry disability index improved postoperatively. Bone union was observed using computed tomography 12 months after surgery. Conclusion For cases with difficulty in LLIF cage insertion for Meyerding grade II spondylolisthesis due to the narrow anteroposterior width of interbody space, LIFARL is an option to achieve LLIF combined with posterior PPS accurately and safely. Trial registration UMIN-Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000040268, Registered 29 April 2020, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000045938