Search

Background Serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma (SEIC) is now considered to represent an early stage of uterine serous carcinoma (USC). It is an intraepithelial lesion but has been reported to cause extrauterine metastases. We report a case of SEIC with serous ovarian carcinoma and lymph node metastasis. Case presentation A 57-year-old post-menopausal woman (gravida 3, para 2, SA1) was referred to our hospital with lower abdominal pain. An ultrasound and MRI showed that the ovary had swollen to 8 cm in size and had a solid lesion. The uterus was normal. The patient underwent exploratory laparoscopy on the suspicion of torsion of the ovarian tumor. Intraoperative findings showed a right ovarian tumor, but no ovarian tumor torsion was observed. A small amount of bloody ascites was found in the Douglas fossa, and bleeding was observed from the tumor itself. A right salpingo-oophorectomy was then performed. Histopathological results revealed a high-grade serous carcinoma. Forty days after the first surgery, we performed a staging laparotomy: a total abdominal hysterectomy, left salpingo-oophorectomy, systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy, and a partial omentectomy. A complete cytoreduction was achieved. In the pathological examination, the invasion of the serous carcinoma was observed in the left ovarian ligament, and lymph node metastasis was found in the paraaortic lymph nodes. Atypical columnar cells formed irregular papillary lesions which had proliferated in the endometrium, and this was diagnosed as SEIC. The final diagnosis was serous ovarian cancer, FIGO stage IIIA1(ii), pT2bN1M0, with SEIC. Conclusion We report a case of SEIC with synchronous serous carcinoma of the adnexa uteri. Both were serous carcinomas and, thus, it was difficult to identify the primary lesion. The distinction between metastatic cancer and two independent primary tumors is important for an accurate diagnosis and tumor staging. Histological diagnostic criteria remain controversial, and further development of a method for differentiating between both diseases is required.

Highlights • Delayed treatment & diagnosis of ovarian torsion may cause pregnancy termination. • Optimal management for these patients remains unstandardized. • No consensus exists regarding the appropriate surgical approach. • A 40-year-old pregnant female presented to us with ovarian torsion and OHSS. • She was successfully treated with laparoscopic detorsion., Introduction Ovarian torsion in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a relatively rare but serious complication in pregnant women. A delay in treatment increases the risk for functional loss of the ovary and early termination of pregnancy. In this report, we present the case of a 40-year-old female with OHSS who experienced ovarian torsion that was successfully treated with laparoscopic detorsion. Presentation of case A 40-year-old pregnant woman in the 6th week of gestation who had conceived following in vitro fertilization presented to us with severe and persistent lower abdominal pain. Ultrasound examination revealed a viable singleton intrauterine pregnancy and bilateral enlarged ovaries with scanty ascites. Approximately 14 h after symptom onset, exploratory laparoscopy was performed. The right ovary was found to be twisted once around over the pedicle, and laparoscopic detorsion was completed. Postoperative follow-up was uneventful, and she successfully delivered a healthy infant at 38 weeks of gestation. Discussion Although the reports on successful laparoscopic surgery for pregnant women with ovarian torsion are becoming more frequent, there are few reports on laparoscopic surgery for ovarian torsion in OHSS during the early first trimester. Optimal management of ovarian torsion during pregnancy needs to be explored for these patients. Conclusion Immediate explorative laparoscopic surgery is a potentially safe and useful strategy for treating ovarian torsion during the early first trimester of pregnancy.

1) Our investigation was made on the distribution of the free amino acids in the five parts of brain. The anomalies of these distributions under the influence of premature birth have recovered with growth, but the anomalies have been found to be detectable in the diencephalon and the midbrain even at the third week of life. 2) By using the ratio' of (Glu+GABA+Asp)/(Tau+PE) as the maturity index, it is found that the premature rat is retarded in development in all parts of brain except the cerebrum and is remarkably retarded in the diencephalon. 3) The metabolism of sulfur-containing amino acid in the brain of premature rats was found to be more active than that in control rats at the time of birth. The metabolism of the premature rat had caught up with that of the control rat at the age of three weeks.