Search

Hemorrhagic fever outbreaks are difficult to diagnose and control in part because of a lack of low-cost and easily accessible diagnostic structures in countries where etiologic agents are present. Furthermore, initial clinical symptoms are common and shared with other endemic diseases such as malaria or typhoid fever. Current molecular diagnostic methods such as polymerase chain reaction require trained personnel and laboratory infrastructure, hindering diagnostics at the point of need, particularly in outbreak settings. Therefore, rapid diagnostic tests such as lateral flow can be broadly deployed and are typically well-suited to rapidly diagnose hemorrhagic fever viruses, such as Ebola virus. Early detection and control of Ebola outbreaks require simple, easy-to-use assays that can detect very low amount of virus in blood. Here, we developed and characterized an immunoassay test based on immunochromatography coupled to silver amplification technology to detect the secreted glycoprotein of EBOV. The glycoprotein is among the first viral proteins to be detected in blood. This strategy aims at identifying infected patients early following onset of symptoms by detecting low amount of sGP protein in blood samples. The limit of detection achieved by this sGP-targeted kit is 2.2 x 104 genome copies/ml in plasma as assayed in a monkey analytical cohort. Clinical performance evaluation showed a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 85.7% when evaluated with plasma samples from healthy controls and patients infected with Zaire Ebola virus from Macenta, Guinea. This rapid and accurate diagnostic test could therefore be used in endemic countries for early detection of infected individuals in point of care settings. Moreover, it could also support efficient clinical triage in hospitals or clinical centers and thus reducing transmission rates to prevent and better manage future severe outbreaks., Author summary Ebola virus disease is a severe disease caused by Ebola virus, a member of the filovirus family, which occurs in humans and other primates. Ebola is believed to be zoonotic, however the natural reservoir is unknown. Overlapping symptoms with other endemic diseases, such as malaria and cholera, make accurate diagnostic challenging. Outbreaks of Ebola have been widespread as the consequence of the absence of available rapid, sensitive, specific, robust, and affordable licensed diagnostic test in remote areas, where outbreaks usually start. Here we have established and validated a rapid diagnostic test, which is fast, sensitive, specific, efficient, affordable, and user-friendly. Its analytical characteristics make it suitable for clinical management during Ebola virus outbreaks in remote areas. Of interest, this rapid diagnostic test detects the presence of an early viral antigen, the secreted glycoprotein, found in blood of patients shortly after infection, suggesting that it could be used to identify infected patients shortly after onset of symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Whether anti-D produced by individuals with a weak D phenotype are allo- or autoantibodies remains a matter of debate even though blood transfusion practice is impacted. The aim of our study was to determine the serologic features of anti-D in individuals expressing the most frequent weak D type in Caucasians that are weak D Type 1 or weak D Type 2, to assess whether anti-D were allo- or autoantibodies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Serologic D typing and molecular analysis enabled the including of 121 weak D Type 1 individuals and 99 weak D Type 2 individuals in our study. Serologic features of anti-D included autologous controls, direct antiglobulin test, elution, and titration of anti-D before and after adsorption of serum on autologous red blood cells (RBCs). RESULTS: Serologic D typing showed a variable reactivity of RBCs expressing weak D Type 1 or weak D Type 2 (4+ to 0). Anti-D was identified in six weak D Type 1 and six weak D Type 2 individuals, respectively. The serologic data were in favor of autoantibodies. CONCLUSION: A complete anti-D investigation in individuals with a D variant (weak D or partial D identified by molecular analysis) should be systematically performed before any valid conclusion on the nature of the antibody. Transfusing weak D Type 1 or weak D Type 2 patients with D+ RBC units should be recommended. Weak D Type 1 or weak D Type 2 pregnant women do not need anti-D immunoprophylaxis.

Resume But de l’etude La determination des antigenes erythrocytaires deduite de l’analyse des systemes de groupe sanguin par des techniques de biologie moleculaire (genotypage) est devenue en quelques annees un outil indispensable dans les laboratoires d’immunohematologie specialises. Le Centre national de reference pour les groupes sanguins (CNRGS) realise en routine le genotypage des systemes FY, JK et MNS (genotypage courant), donnant un phenotype deduit pour les antigenes FY1, FY2, JK1, JK2, MNS3 et MNS4. Patients et methodes Nous avons realise une etude des prescriptions de genotypage courant parvenues au CNRGS au cours des trois annees precedentes. Resultats Entre fevrier 2006 et fevrier 2009, le CNRGS a effectue 2392 genotypages, dont 981 genotypages courants. L’analyse realisee sur les 172 genotypages courants effectues en 2008 a montre que les prelevements parvenaient avec une demande explicite de genotypage dans 63,9 % des cas. Sur ces demandes, 42,7 % etaient des demandes isolees de genotypage, tandis que 57,2 % etaient des demandes d’identification d’anticorps anti-erythrocytaires et de genotypage. Toutes les demandes se sont revelees etre conformes aux indications de genotypage donnees par les recommandations professionnelles, sans prescription abusive, a savoir contexte transfusionnel dans 63,6 % des cas ou positivite d’un test direct a l’antiglobuline dans 24,5 % des cas. Enfin, 36 % des prelevements parvenus au CNRGS ne demandaient pas explicitement la realisation d’un genotypage, cependant effectue par le CNRGS dans le cadre d’un bilan immunohematologique (identification des anticorps anti-erythrocytaires). Conclusion Si l’interet du genotypage n’est plus a demontrer, sa place exacte dans les laboratoires d’immunohematologie specialises reste encore a determiner. L’utilisation des techniques de « genotypage a haut debit » devrait ouvrir de nouvelles perspectives.

Whether or not patients whose red blood cells (RBCs) carry certain weak D types produce anti-D, and if they do whether it is allo- or auto anti-D, remains controversial. The aim of this study was to determine the serologic features of anti-D in individuals expressing a weak D other than type 1 or type 2 and to assess whether the anti-D was an allo- or autoantibody. Serologic D typing and molecular analyses were performed on 748 individuals.Serologic characterization of anti-D included autologous controls,direct antiglobulin test, elution, and titration of anti-D before and after adsorption of serum onto autologous RBCs. From molecular analyses, 459 individuals exhibited a weak D type. We described seven novel RHD variant alleles. The most frequent types of weak D were type 1 (30.1%), type 2 (23.7%), type 4.0 (10.2%), type 4.2.2(20.3%), type 11 (3.9%), and type 15 (3.7%). Anti-D was identified in the sera of 9 of 47 individuals with weak D type 4.0, in 14 of 93 with weak D type 4.2.2, in 1 of 18 with weak D type 11, in 1 of 17 with weak D type 15, and in 1 weak D type 33 individual.Anti-D was demonstrated to be an alloantibody in weak D type 4.0, type 4.2.2, and type 15 individuals, but an autoantibody in weak D type 11 and type 33 individuals. In conclusion, only a complete serologic investigation of individuals with a given weak D type identified by molecular analysis allows concluding on the nature of the antibody. Transfusing weak D type 4.2.2 and type 15 patients with D- RBC units and proposing anti-D immunoprophylaxis to women with these weak D types should be considered.

Whether anti-D produced by individuals with a weak D phenotype are allo- or autoantibodies remains a matter of debate even though blood transfusion practice is impacted. The aim of our study was to determine the serologic features of anti-D in individuals expressing the most frequent weak D type in Caucasians that are weak D Type 1 or weak D Type 2, to assess whether anti-D were allo- or autoantibodies.Serologic D typing and molecular analysis enabled the including of 121 weak D Type 1 individuals and 99 weak D Type 2 individuals in our study. Serologic features of anti-D included autologous controls, direct antiglobulin test, elution, and titration of anti-D before and after adsorption of serum on autologous red blood cells (RBCs).Serologic D typing showed a variable reactivity of RBCs expressing weak D Type 1 or weak D Type 2 (4+ to 0). Anti-D was identified in six weak D Type 1 and six weak D Type 2 individuals, respectively. The serologic data were in favor of autoantibodies.A complete anti-D investigation in individuals with a D variant (weak D or partial D identified by molecular analysis) should be systematically performed before any valid conclusion on the nature of the antibody. Transfusing weak D Type 1 or weak D Type 2 patients with D+ RBC units should be recommended. Weak D Type 1 or weak D Type 2 pregnant women do not need anti-D immunoprophylaxis.

Using the experimental infection of cynomolgus macaques with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) as a model of human immunodeficiency virus infection in humans, we studied the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a vaccine strategy combining DNA, the modified recombinant vaccinia virus strain Ankara (MVA) and Semliki Forest virus (SFV) expressing gag, pol, env, tat, rev and nef from SIV. Although this immunization strategy induced moderate immune responses, the control of pathogenic SIVmac251 infection following mucosal challenge was clearly improved by vaccination. The viral load in vaccinated animals was reduced by 2 logs during the acute phase of infection and, in five of the six macaques, viral load fell below the detection limit at set point. No correlates of immune protection were identified, but SIV-specific T-cell responses were detected earlier in vaccinated animals than in controls. These results highlight the power of live attenuated virus vectors for vaccination strategies.