Search

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Successful treatment of chronic hepatitis C with oral direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) leads to virological cure, however, the subsequent risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) persists. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of biannual surveillance for HCC in patients cured of hepatitis C and the optimal age to stop surveillance. METHODS: We developed a microsimulation model of the natural history of HCC in individuals with hepatitis C and advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis who achieved virological cure with oral DAAs. We used published data on HCC incidence, tumor progression, real-world HCC surveillance adherence, and costs and utilities of different health states. We compared biannual HCC surveillance using ultrasound and alpha-fetoprotein for varying durations of surveillance (from 5 years to lifetime) vs. no surveillance. RESULTS: In virologically cured patients with cirrhosis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of biannual surveillance remained below $150,000 per additional quality-adjusted life year (QALY) (range: $79,500-$94,800) when surveillance was stopped at age 70, irrespective of the starting age (40–65). Compared with no surveillance, surveillance detected 130 additional HCCs in ‘very early’/early stage and yielded 51 additional QALYs per 1,000 patients with cirrhosis. In virologically cured patients with advanced fibrosis, the ICER of biannual surveillance remained below $150,000/QALY (range: $124,600-$129,800) when surveillance was stopped at age 60, irrespective of the starting age (40–50). Compared with no surveillance, surveillance detected 24 additional HCCs in ‘very early’/early stage and yielded 12 additional QALYs per 1,000 patients with advanced fibrosis. CONCLUSION: Biannual surveillance for HCC in patients cured of hepatitis C is cost-effective until the age of 70 for patients with cirrhosis, and until the age of 60 for patients with stable advanced fibrosis. LAY SUMMARY: Individuals who are cured of hepatitis C using oral antiviral drugs remain at risk of developing liver cancer. The value of lifelong screening for liver cancer in these individuals is not known. By simulating the life course of hepatitis C cured individuals, we found that ultrasound-based biannual screening for liver cancer is cost-effective up to age 70 in those with cirrhosis and up to age 60 in those with stable advanced fibrosis.

Background Treatment patterns for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) differ, but limited studies exist comparing them. This study examines differences in molecular profiling rates and treatment patterns in these populations, focusing on use of adjuvant, liver-directed, targeted, and investigational therapies. Methods This multicenter collaboration included patients with ICC or ECC treated at 1 of 8 participating institutions. Retrospective data were collected on risk factors, pathology, treatments, and survival. Comparative statistical tests were 2-sided. Results Among 1039 patients screened, 847 patients met eligibility (ICC = 611, ECC = 236). Patients with ECC were more likely than those with ICC to present with early stage disease (53.8% vs 28.0%), undergo surgical resection (55.1% vs 29.8%), and receive adjuvant chemoradiation (36.5% vs 4.2%) (all P Conclusions Patients with advanced ECC have low rates of molecular profiling, possibly in part because of insufficient tissue. They also have low rates of targeted therapy use and clinical trial enrollment. While these rates are higher in advanced ICC, the prognosis for both subtypes of cholangiocarcinoma remains poor, and a pressing need exists for new effective targeted therapies and broader access to clinical trials.

Supplementary Data from Organoid Sensitivity Correlates with Therapeutic Response in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer

Purpose:Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a significant health issue. For most patients, there are no options for targeted therapy, and existing treatments are limited by toxicity. The HOPE trial (Harnessing Organoids for PErsonalized Therapy) was a pilot feasibility trial aiming to prospectively generate patient-derived organoids (PDO) from patients with PDAC and test their drug sensitivity and correlation with clinical outcomes.Experimental Design:PDOs were established from a heterogeneous population of patients with PDAC including both basal and classical PDAC subtypes.Results:A method for classifying PDOs as sensitive or resistant to chemotherapy regimens was developed to predict the clinical outcome of patients. Drug sensitivity testing on PDOs correlated with clinical responses to treatment in individual patients.Conclusions:These data support the investigation of PDOs to guide treatment in prospective interventional trials in PDAC.

Purpose: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a significant health issue. For most patients, there are no options for targeted therapy, and existing treatments are limited by toxicity. The HOPE trial (Harnessing Organoids for PErsonalized Therapy) was a pilot feasibility trial aiming to prospectively generate patient-derived organoids (PDO) from patients with PDAC and test their drug sensitivity and correlation with clinical outcomes. Experimental Design: PDOs were established from a heterogeneous population of patients with PDAC including both basal and classical PDAC subtypes. Results: A method for classifying PDOs as sensitive or resistant to chemotherapy regimens was developed to predict the clinical outcome of patients. Drug sensitivity testing on PDOs correlated with clinical responses to treatment in individual patients. Conclusions: These data support the investigation of PDOs to guide treatment in prospective interventional trials in PDAC.

BACKGROUND Germline genetic testing currently is recommended for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In the current study, the authors assessed how often results are communicated to first-degree relatives within 3 months and the emotional impact of testing on patients. METHODS A total of 148 patients who were newly diagnosed with PDAC and who had undergone testing of 32 cancer susceptibility genes at 3 academic centers were selected; 71% participated. Subjects completed the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) and a family communication survey. The results of both surveys were assessed at 3 months according to the genetic test result (positive, negative, or variant of unknown significance [VUS]) and whether a patient met criteria for genetic testing. RESULTS A total of 99 patients completed the MICRA survey and 104 completed the family communication survey. The average age of the patients was 67 years, 47% were female, 29% had stage III/IV (AJCC 8th edition) disease, and 42% met genetic testing criteria. Approximately 80% of patients told at least 1 first-degree relative about their result. There was a trend toward greater disclosure among patients who tested positive (93% vs 77% for those with a VUS result [P = .149] and 74% for those who tested negative [P = .069]). Patients not meeting genetic testing criteria were less likely to disclose results (69% vs 93%; P = .003). MICRA scores did not differ by test result, age, stage of disease, or sex. CONCLUSIONS The rate of result communication was high, although it was lower among patients who did not meet genetic testing criteria, those who tested negative, or those who had a VUS result. Testing-associated distress was similar across patient groups, and was comparable to that reported by other patients with cancer. Improved communication for all patients is crucial given the prognosis of PDAC, which limits time for disclosure.

First-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have elevated PDAC risk, partially due to germline genetic variants. We evaluated the potential effectiveness of genetic testing to target MRI-based screening among FDRs.We used a microsimulation model of PDAC, calibrated to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data, to estimate the potential life expectancy (LE) gain of screening for each of the following groups of FDRs: individuals who test positive for each of eight variants associated with elevated PDAC risk (e.g., BRCA2, CDKN2A); individuals who test negative; and individuals who do not test. Screening was assumed to take place if LE gains were achievable. We simulated multiple screening approaches, defined by starting age and frequency. Sensitivity analysis evaluated changes in results given varying model assumptions.For women, 92% of mutation carriers had projected LE gains from screening for PDAC, if screening strategies (start age, frequency) were optimized. Among carriers, LE gains ranged from 0.1 days (ATM+ women screened once at age 70) to 510 days (STK11+ women screened annually from age 40). For men, LE gains were projected for all mutation carriers, ranging from 0.2 days (BRCA1+ men screened once at age 70) to 620 days (STK11+ men screened annually from age 40). For men and women who did not undergo genetic testing, or for whom testing showed no variant, screening yielded small LE benefit (0-2.1 days).Genetic testing of FDRs can inform targeted PDAC screening by identifying which FDRs may benefit.

Background Advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Novel second-line treatments for advanced CCA underscore the need to understand treatment patterns and economic burden of illness in clinical practice. Methods This retrospective, claims-based study using Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database [2007-2019] selected patients with CCA who experienced failure of a line of therapy containing either gemcitabine or fluorouracil. The index date was defined based on evidence of treatment failure: date of last administration of the gemcitabine- or fluorouracil-based regimen plus 28 days, or initiation date of the next-line systemic therapy. Treatment patterns, healthcare resource use (HRU), costs, and survival were assessed during the follow-up period (index until death or end of eligibility). Results A total of 1,298 patients met inclusion criteria and had a mean age of 69.1 years. There were 958 patients (73.8%) with intrahepatic and 275 patients (21.2%) with extrahepatic CCA. Average follow-up was 7.5 months. Almost 40% of patients did not receive another line of therapy after the index date. Among the 784 patients who received another line of therapy, 40.3% used fluorouracil-based therapy, 30.7% used gemcitabine-based therapy, and 29.3% used capecitabine-based therapy. Total mean per patient per month CCA-related healthcare costs were $7,743, with medical services ($6,685) a larger driver of monthly costs relative to treatment costs ($1,058). Median overall survival (OS) was 5.3 months among all patients. Conclusions Many patients with advanced CCA do not initiate additional therapy after failure of gemcitabine or fluorouracil treatment, and there is considerable variation in treatments among those who do. This study highlights the high costs and unmet need for a standard of care in this patient population.

Background For cancer patients, coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19) infection can lead to delays in cancer therapy both due to the infection itself and due to the need to minimize exposure to other patients and to staff. Clearance guidelines have been proposed, but expected time to clearance has not been established. Methods We identified all patients at a tertiary care hospital cancer center between 25 March 2020 and 6 June 2020 with a positive nasopharyngeal reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) test for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), a cancer‐related visit within 3 years, and at least one follow‐up assay. We determined the time to clearance using American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK‐NICE), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria. A matched non‐cancer comparison cohort was also identified. Results Thirty‐two cancer patients were identified. Nineteen were cleared by ASCO criteria, with estimated median time to clearance of 50 days. Fourteen patients resumed chemotherapy prior to clearance. Using UK‐NICE criteria, median time to clearance would have been 31 days, and using CDC criteria, it would have been 13 days. The matched non‐cancer cohort had similar clearance time, but with less frequent testing. Conclusion SARS‐CoV‐2 clearance times differ substantially depending on the criteria used and may be prolonged in cancer patients. This could lead to a delay in cancer care, increased use of clearance testing, and extension of infection control precautions., In this single‐institution retrospective cohort study, the median time to SARS‐CoV‐2 clearance among cancer patients was 50 days using the ASCO/CDC criteria of two negative RT‐PCR assays >24 h apart. Using alternative criteria of one negative RT‐PCR assay (UK‐NICE) or CDC clinical criteria (10 days after first positive RT‐PCR and 3 days after last symptoms), median clearance times were 31 and 13 days, respectively.

Objectives To gain insight into the natural history and carcinogenesis pathway of Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia (PanIN) lesions by building a calibrated simulation model of PanIN progression to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) Methods We revised a previously validated simulation model of solid PDAC, calibrating the model to fit data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program and published literature on PanIN prevalence by age. We estimated the likelihood of progression from PanIN states (1, 2, and 3) to PDAC and the time between PanIN onset and PDAC (dwell time). We evaluated a hypothetical intervention to test for and treat PanIN 3 lesions to estimate the potential benefits from PanIN detection. Results We estimated the lifetime probability of progressing from PanIN 1 to PDAC to be 1.5% (men), 1.3% (women). Progression from PanIN 1 to PDAC took 33.6 years and 35.3 years, respectively, and from PanIN 3 to PDAC took 11.3 years and 12.3 years. A hypothetical test for PanIN 3 detection and treatment could provide a maximum, average life expectancy gain of 40 days. Conclusions Our modeling analysis estimates PanINs have a relatively indolent course to PDAC, supporting the feasibility of potential future early detection strategies.

BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in 32 cancer susceptibility genes in individuals with newly diagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). A key secondary objective was to evaluate how often PGVs would have been undetected with existing genetic testing criteria. METHODS From May 2016 through May 2017, this multicenter cohort study enrolled consecutive patients aged 18 to 89 years with histologically confirmed PDAC diagnosed within the previous 12 weeks. Demographics, medical histories, and 3-generation pedigrees were collected from participants who provided samples for germline DNA analysis. RESULTS Four hundred nineteen patients were deemed eligible, 302 were enrolled, and 298 were included in the final cohort. Clinically actionable variants were reported in 29 PDAC patients (9.7%), with 23 (7.7%) having a PGV associated with an increased risk for PDAC. Six of 23 individuals (26%) with PDAC-associated gene mutations did not meet currently established genetic testing criteria. According to guideline-based genetic testing, only 11 of the 23 PGVs (48%) in known PDAC genes would have been detected. Six additional patients (2%) had PGVs associated with an increased risk for other cancers. CONCLUSIONS These findings support the significant prevalence of PGVs associated with PDAC and the limitations of current paradigms for selecting patients for genetic testing, and they thereby lend support for universal germline multigene genetic testing in this population.

Current guidelines recommend that all women with ovarian cancer undergo germline genetic testing for BRCA1/2 . Increasingly, genetic testing is being performed via panels that include other genes that confer a high or moderate risk of breast cancer. In addition, many women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer are not found to have a mutation, but may have increased risk of breast cancer for which surveillance and risk reduction strategies are indicated. This review discusses how to assess and manage an increased risk of breast cancer through surveillance, preventive medications, and risk-reducing surgery. Assessing and managing the increased risk of breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers after a diagnosis of ovarian cancer can be challenging. For the first few years after an ovarian cancer diagnosis, BRCA1/2 mutation carriers have a relatively low risk of breast cancer, and their prognosis is largely determined by the ovarian cancer. However, if these women remain in remission after two years, the risk of breast cancer becomes comparable with, and in some cases exceeds, their risk of ovarian cancer recurrence. For these women, breast cancer surveillance and risk reduction becomes important to their overall health. Specifically, for BRCA1/2 carriers who are diagnosed with early-stage ovarian cancer, we recommend regular breast cancer surveillance and consideration of risk reduction with medication and/or prophylactic mastectomy. For women with advanced ovarian cancer who do not achieve remission, breast cancer surveillance or prophylaxis is not of value. However, among carriers with more favorable advanced disease, it is reasonable to initiate breast cancer surveillance. Patients with less favorable advanced stage disease who achieve sustained remission (>2–5years) should also consider more aggressive strategies for breast cancer screening and prevention. For mutation carriers who remain in remission after five years, prophylactic mastectomy can be considered.

In response to the letter to the editor by Lestuzzi et al., results of a recently published article on fluoropyrimidine-associated cardiotoxity are clarified.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text, Objectives: Our study provides phase-specific cost estimates for pancreatic cancer based on stage and treatment. We compare treatment costs between the different phases and within the stage and treatment modality subgroups. Methods: Our cohort included 20,917 pancreatic cancer patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database diagnosed between 2000 and 2011. We allocated costs into four phases of care-staging (or surgery), initial, continuing, and terminal– and calculated the total, cancer-attributable, and patient-liability costs in 2018 US dollars. We fit linear regression models using log transformation to determine whether costs were predicted by age and calendar year. Results: Monthly cost estimates were high during the staging and surgery phases, decreased over the initial and continuing phases, and increased during the three-month terminal phase. Overall, the linear regression models showed that cancer-attributable costs either remained stable or increased by year, and either were unaffected by age or decreased with older age; continuing phase costs for stage II patients increased with age. Conclusions: Our estimates demonstrate that pancreatic cancer costs can vary widely by stage and treatment received. These cost estimates can serve as an important baseline foundation to guide resource allocation for cancer care and research in the future.

TPS350 Background: Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1) are found in approximately 20-30% of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and less commonly in glioma, chondrosarcoma, and other gastrointestinal malignancies. Despite documented clinical activity of mIDH1 inhibition in solid tumors, there are no approved targeted therapies for this patient population. LY3410738 is a potent, selective, and covalent inhibitor of mIDH1 R132. LY3410738 is differentiated from prior mIDH1 inhibitors by 1) its unique covalent binding mode, 2) its increased potency, and 3) its unique binding site outside of the dimer interface, which enables activity in the setting of known common second-site IDH1 mutations. Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, global phase 1 study with oral LY3410738 currently enrolling patients with advanced CCA and other solid tumor types (NCT04521686). A dose escalation cohort will be followed with 4 exploratory expansion cohorts. The primary objective for dose escalation is determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The primary objective for dose expansion is to assess the preliminary anti-tumor activity by ORR of LY3410738 when administered alone or in combination with cisplatin plus gemcitabine. Secondary objectives include evaluating safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, progression free survival, and overall survival. Key inclusion criteria include any solid tumor with the presence of mIDH1 R132, ECOG performance status ≤1, and adequate organ function. Any prior treatment including an IDH1 inhibitor is allowed in the dose escalation cohort. Exclusion criteria include presence of active central nervous system metastases, leptomeningeal disease, and active or uncontrolled infection. CCA patients must not have had locoregional therapy within 4 weeks prior to the initial study dose, history of hepatic encephalopathy or refractory ascites, ongoing cholangitis, or mixed hepatocellular-CCA histology. Dose escalation will follow a 3+3 design and will allow patient back-fill to dose levels previously cleared for safety. Each cycle will be 28 days (4 weeks). Once the RP2D is determined, LY3410738 will be evaluated as monotherapy in expansion cohorts 1-3, and in combination with cisplatin plus gemcitabine in expansion cohort 4. Cohort 1 will enroll CCA patients with measurable disease who have received prior chemotherapy. Cohort 2 will enroll patients with advanced solid tumors except CCA who have measurable disease and received standard therapies. Cohort 3 will enroll patients with advanced solid tumors who have non-measurable disease and received standard therapies. Cohort 4 will enroll CCA patients with measurable disease who are treatment naïve for advanced disease. Clinical trial information: NCT04521686.

49 Background: COVID-19 in oncologic patients presents a clinical dilemma. To reduce the risk of adverse events as well as the risk of exposing others, many institutions have established protocols to define COVID-19 clearance. However, the optimal criteria for discontinuing infection precautions and/or resuming anticancer therapy in COVID-19 patients is unknown. Methods: We identified patients with a positive COVID-19 PCR at a tertiary care hospital between 3/25/2020 and 6/6/2020, and who also had seen an oncologist for a cancer-related diagnosis within the last 3 years. COVID-19 PCR testing was performed using the Abbott Laboratories m2000 platform in conjunction with either the Aldatu Biosciences PANDAA qDxTM SARS-CoV-2 or Abbott RealTime SARS-CoV-2 assays. At our institution, and per current ASCO guidelines, discontinuation of COVID-19 precautions requires two consecutive negative viral PCR tests > 24 hours apart. Results: During the follow-up period, we identified 32 patients with a positive COVID-19 PCR who were receiving active oncology care. Half of this cohort (16/32) had metastatic disease at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis. 17 patients were on active treatment at time of COVID-19 diagnosis (8 receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy). Among patients who met criteria for COVID-19 PCR clearance, median time to clearance was 37 days (range, 10-58 days). When accounting for censoring at the time of last COVID-19 assay, median time to clearance for all patients was estimated at 50 days. 14 patients resumed anti-cancer treatment prior to COVID-19 clearance (5 received cytotoxic chemotherapy), requiring substantial allocation of staff and resources for safe treatment isolated from other oncology patients. Among the 13 patients who met clearance criteria, 2 subsequently had a positive COVID-19 PCR after resumption of treatment. We explored COVID-19 clearance time under an alternative symptom/time based strategy based on CDC criteria (at least 10 days after first positive PCR and 3 days after last day of symptoms). Under this strategy, median time to COVID-19 clearance would be 14 days. Conclusions: In patients with cancer who develop COVID-19 infection, viral shedding can persist for many weeks after disease onset, but the implications of this shedding on likelihood of infection is unknown. Treatment of COVID-19 positive oncology patients requires substantial planning and resources. Test-based versus symptom/time-based strategies for determining discontinuation of precautions and resumption of treatment should be further investigated to provide safe and effective care.

The HOPE trial (Harnessing Organoids for PErsonalized Therapy) was a pilot study to test the feasibility of generating patient derived organoids (PDOs) from patients with pancreatic cancer under real world conditions, test drug sensitivity against these PDOs, and correlate these findings with clinical outcomes. Biopsies were obtained primarily during routine clinical care from surgical specimens, ascites, fine needle biopsies (FNB) of primary tumors, and IR guided core biopsies of liver and lymph node metastases. PDOs were grown in WNT free media according to our previously published methods. PDO drug sensitivity testing was performed on a panel of drugs, AUC calculated, and sensitivity ranked. Patients were followed clinically and assessed for disease control. At data cutoff (January 2020), we enrolled a total of 76 subjects representing all stages of disease. Drug testing was performed successfully on PDOs generated from 12 of these subjects (16%). Factors contributing to success obtaining sufficient cells for PDO generation included modality, body part, and tumor cellularity. H&E and IHC corresponded in matched PDOs and donor tumors, as did DNA alterations. Transcriptomes of PDOs were classified as both ‘basal' and ‘classical' subtypes. When AUC values were annotated with clinical data, the Jenks break of 1.69 segregated matched PDO/AUC values into disease control and progressive disease. We estimated that a PDO AUC value 99% probability of disease control from a regimen that contains this drug, whereas if all drugs in a regimen had an AUC > 2.75 there is a > 80% probability of accurately predicting resistance. To illustrate the potential of PDO testing to tailor treatment for an individual patient, we described a case of a subject with stage IV PDAC with a KRAS mutation and ERBB2 amplification. The subject had disease control with FOLFIRINOX, which was held for toxicity. The PDO showed resistance to oxaliplatin and the patient subsequently had an extended period of disease control with regimens which did not include oxaliplatin, highlighting the potential of PDO drug sensitivity testing to exclude ineffective treatments from combination chemotherapy and limit toxicity. In conclusion, we have shown the feasibility of collecting material via real-world clinical practice sufficient to develop PDOs suitable for rapidly screening multiple drugs, and have shown a high degree of correlation between clinical outcomes in patients with PDAC and matched PDO drug sensitivity. We determined preliminary criteria based on the AUC of individual drugs in PDOs to predict drug sensitivity in subjects. These results highlight the potential of PDOs to personalize therapy and allow for the exclusion of ineffective drugs from combination regimens thereby reducing toxicity. We anticipate this approach will be used in future trials to prospectively inform treatment selection for patients with PDAC. Citation Format: Joseph Elan Grossman, Ling Huang, Lakshmi Muthuswamy, Sofia Perea, Dipikaa Akshinthala, Raul Gonzalez, Leo Tsai, Jonah Cohen, Mandeep Sawhney, Douglas Pleskow, Tyler M. Berzin, Bruno Bockorny, Andrea Bullock, Benjamin Schlechter, Mary Linton B. Peters, Catherine Conahan, Supraja Narasimhan, Christine Lim, Roger Davis, Robert Besaw, Martin Smith, Tara Kent, Mark Callery, Senthil K. Muthuswamy, Manuel Hidalgo. Organoid sensitivity in pancreatic cancer correlates with clinical response to treatment and reveals utility for reducing toxicity: Preliminary results from the HOPE trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT119.

11029 Background: In recent years, genomic profiling has become standard of care for several gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. In addition to standard of care indications, comprehensive genomic profiling has led to novel and expanded applications of targeted therapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy and facilitated identification of potential clinical trials. A GI molecular tumor board (MTB) was developed with a goal of improving understanding of the biological effects of genomic alterations and their therapeutic implications to enhance personalized therapy. Methods: Foundation Medicine (FM) collaborated with physicians in the GI oncology group of an academic medical center to develop a GI MTB starting March 2019. As of December 2019, 27 GI oncology cases were presented where FoundationOneCDx testing was performed and a clinical question was posed. Cases were discussed by faculty, fellows, research staff, and a clinical genomic scientist and oncologist from FM. Impacted signaling pathways and biomarkers were discussed for each case alongside clinical content so that physicians could consider therapeutic options and clinical trials. Presenting faculty were asked to complete a questionnaire for each case presented to assess the impact of the MTB discussion on clinician knowledge and patient-level treatment recommendations. Results: Of 27 questionnaires sent to 7 providers, 17 (63%) were completed. Respondents indicated that as a result of the MTB, the treatment plan was changed in 2 cases (12%), reinforced in 9 cases (53%) and in 6 cases (35%) there was no effect. On a Likert scale of 1-4 where 1 is “rare/poorly” and 4 is “great” mean scores were as follows: Did this MTB help you understand the biological effects of the main genomic alteration(s) reported in the case presented? 3.3. Did this MTB help you understand the possible therapeutic implications of the main genomic alterations in the case presented? 3.3. Did this MTB improve your understanding of the role of next generation sequencing and comprehensive genomic profiling in making treatment decisions? 3.4. Conclusions: The results of our questionnaire indicate that treatment decisions were changed in a minority of cases based on the MTB. In most cases, clinical decision making was reinforced and understanding of the biological effects of genomic alterations and their therapeutic implications were improved. Based on this feedback we will continue to refine and integrate the GI MTB into clinical care for patients with GI malignancies, and share our experience locally with other disease groups.

e16630 Background: Nivolumab, an anti-PD1 antibody, is FDA approved in patients (pts) with HCC. Anti-PD-1 promotes hyperstimulation of host immunity and is associated with a spectrum of toxicities known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). In other malignancies, higher rates of irAEs are associated with improved cancer outcomes. This study shows correlation between irAEs and efficacy in pts with HCC treated with nivolumab. Methods: Demographic and toxicity data were collected retrospectively on all pts with HCC treated with nivolumab at a single institution from Jan 2012 – Sept 2019. Response was evaluated using RECISTv1.1. Adverse events were assessed according to CTCAEv5.0. Categorical variables were assessed by Fisher's exact test. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by the Cox-regression model. Results: 30 pts were treated; irAEs were detected in 16 (53%). There was no difference in baseline characteristics among those who did and did not experience irAEs (Table). The most frequent irAEs were elevated AST/ALT (n = 7; 44%), rash (n = 4; 25%), and hypothyroid (n = 4; 25%). 3 G3 (rash and transaminitis) and 1 G4 AE (pured red cell apalasia) were observed. Among all pts, overall response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 13 and 50%, respectively. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 27 and 56 weeks (w), respectively. The RR and DCR were higher among irAEs vs non-irAEs, although this did not reach statistical significance (RR 25 vs 0%; p = 0.05; DCR 62 vs 35%; p = 0.19). Median PFS and OS were longer in those with irAEs vs non-irAE; PFS 33 vs 16 w (HR: 0.26; CI 95%: 0.076-0.89; p = 0.028); (OS 69 vs 21 w HR: 0.18; CI 95%: 0.05-0.58; p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, viral etiology was associated with prolonged PFS (p = 0.002) and MELD was associated with reduced OS (p = 0.004). Conclusions: Development of irAEs was associated with prolonged PFS and OS in pts with HCC treated with nivolumab. Further study is needed to determine whether type of irAE, onset time, or duration affect cancer outcomes. [Table: see text]

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to test for the possibility that published malignancy risks for side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are overestimates, likely due to verification bias. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We tested for possible verification bias using simulation modeling techniques. First, in age-defined hypothetical cohorts of 10 million persons, we projected the frequency of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) arising from side-branch IPMNs over 5 years using published estimates of their prevalence (4.4%) and rate of malignant transformation (1.9%). Second, we projected the total number of PDAC cases in corresponding cohorts over the same time horizon using national cancer registry data. For each cohort, we determined whether the percentage of all PDAC cases that arose from side-branch IPMNs (i.e., side-branch IPMN–associated PDAC cases) was clinically plausible using an upper limit of 10% to define plausibility, as estimated from the literature. Model assumptions and parameter uncertainty were evaluated in sensitivity analysis. RESULTS. Across all cohorts, percentages of side-branch IPMN–associated PDACs greatly exceeded 10%. In the base case (mean age = 55.7 years), 80% of PDAC cases arose from side-branch IPMNs (7877/9786). In the oldest cohort evaluated (mean age = 75 years), this estimate was 76% (14,227/18,714). In a secondary analysis, we found that if an upper limit threshold of 10% for side-branch IPMN–associated PDAC was imposed, the model-predicted rate of malignancy for side-branch IPMNs would be less than 0.24% over a 5-year time horizon, substantially lower than most literature-based estimates. CONCLUSION. Our results suggest that reported malignancy risks associated with side-branch IPMNs are likely to be overestimates and imply the presence of verification bias.

The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants (PGVs) in 32 cancer susceptibility genes in individuals with newly diagnosed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). A key secondary objective was to evaluate how often PGVs would have been undetected with existing genetic testing criteria.From May 2016 through May 2017, this multicenter cohort study enrolled consecutive patients aged 18 to 89 years with histologically confirmed PDAC diagnosed within the previous 12 weeks. Demographics, medical histories, and 3-generation pedigrees were collected from participants who provided samples for germline DNA analysis.Four hundred nineteen patients were deemed eligible, 302 were enrolled, and 298 were included in the final cohort. Clinically actionable variants were reported in 29 PDAC patients (9.7%), with 23 (7.7%) having a PGV associated with an increased risk for PDAC. Six of 23 individuals (26%) with PDAC-associated gene mutations did not meet currently established genetic testing criteria. According to guideline-based genetic testing, only 11 of the 23 PGVs (48%) in known PDAC genes would have been detected. Six additional patients (2%) had PGVs associated with an increased risk for other cancers.These findings support the significant prevalence of PGVs associated with PDAC and the limitations of current paradigms for selecting patients for genetic testing, and they thereby lend support for universal germline multigene genetic testing in this population.

Despite clinical studies with different mechanisms of action, no new systemic therapies were approved for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between sorafenib in 2007 and regorafenib in 2017. This is an area of interest to improve outcomes and quality of life. Cabozantinib is oral, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that primarily targets MET, VEGFR2, AXL and RET, with additional effect on KIT and FLT3. Cabozantinib is approved for progressive metastatic medullary thyroid cancer and previously treated renal cell carcinoma, and is in development for multiple solid tumors. Given positive results from a Phase II study, cabozantinib is under evaluation in a Phase III randomized controlled trial for patients with advanced HCC previously treated with sorafenib. It has been granted orphan drug status in the USA for this indication. This review summarizes the development of cabozantinib in HCC.

580 Background: Though studies indicate that the genomic profiles of ICC and ECC are distinct, the clinical features that differentiate them still remain to be well characterized. The purpose of this study was to further analyze these differences and patient treatment patterns in a multi-center cohort. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed at 8 institutions on patients (pts) with ICC or ECC diagnosed after June 2009. Data on demographics, risk factors, treatments, pathology and overall survival (OS) were collected. Tumor genotyping results from CLIA-certified tissue assays were analyzed. Fisher’s exact, Wilcoxon rank sum and log-rank tests were used to compare sub-groups. Results: In a database of 737 pts with cholangiocarcinoma, 538(73%) had ICC and 199(27%) had ECC. Pts with ICC more often presented in later stages, had tumors > 5cm at resection (p < 0.0001) and had metastases to the liver, lymph nodes, lung and/or bone (p < 0.01). Pts with ICC more often received liver directed therapy, targeted therapy and multiple lines of systemic therapy and they more often enrolled in a clinical trial (all p < 0.01). Pts with ECC were more likely to be male, undergo surgery, receive adjuvant chemotherapy and/or chemoradiation (all p < 0.05). Mutation profiling performed in 381 (52%) pts (ICC/ECC = 301/80) showed that pts with ICC were more likely to have IDH1 mutations and FGFR2 fusions, whereas pts with ECC were more likely to have KRAS, APC, SMAD4, WNT, TGFb and TP53 mutations (all < 0.05). Factors that did not differ significantly between pts with ICC and ECC include race, rates of primary sclerosing cholangitis, median diagnosis CA19-9 levels and R1 resection rate. Median OS from diagnosis was 18.9 months in ICC and 17.3 months in ECC (p = 0.8471). Conclusions: While pts with ICC and ECC have some similarities in their clinical features, differences in metastases patterns and molecular profiling significantly impact their management such that pts with ICC receive more liver-directed therapy, targeted therapy and more lines of systemic therapy. Further prospective studies are needed as referral patterns to tertiary care centers may have impacted these results.

Dysosmia in PD (Parkinson’s Disease) may result from changes in the olfactory apparatus or in structures involved in olfactory perception. Previous work 1,2 has suggested that deep brain stimulation (DBS) patients have improved odor discrimination in stimulation-on/medicationoff state in comparison to their own scores in a stimulation-off/ medication-off state. What remains unclear is whether it is the ON state itself or an effect of stimulation that leads to improved olfaction. In this study we evaluate dysosmia in two PD cohorts in the ON state, those treated with medication alone and those treated with medication and DBS. A prospective study geared at improving predictive value of olfactory testing with a battery of psychological tests enrolled 45 PD patients and 44 controls. Of the PD patients, 9 had bilateral STN (subthalamic nucleus) DBS and 36 were medically treated. Subset analysis of PD patients with and without DBS placement revealed no difference in apathy or depression. DBS patients had better olfaction on UPSIT (Univ of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test) (p

Purpose This article reviews the progress to date and future directions for investigation of germline and somatic genetic testing to inform pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treatment, screening, and prevention strategies. Methods We searched PubMed to identify recent articles regarding genetic testing in pancreatic cancer, including both germline and somatic testing, and recent genome-wide association studies. References were specifically hand searched as relevant. Guidelines for testing and screening high-risk individuals were included. We searched clinicaltrials.gov to review the current landscape of active clinical trials. Findings Approximately 10% of PDACs are associated with an identified germline mutation. Although germline mutations may inform treatment options and identify high-risk individuals for screening in other cancers, the data on PDAC are only now emerging. For example, poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are under investigation for BRCA-associated PDAC. Somatic mutations have also been identified in PDAC. However, current data are limited regarding treatment for potential PDAC somatic driver mutations. Although erlotinib is used in PDAC, its use is not targeted based on a tumor marker. Many tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeted toward potential driver mutations and critical pathways are in development, including BRAF/MEK, ALK, and CDK4/6. A consensus on screening strategies for individuals at high risk for PDAC is still evolving because of the relatively low prevalence of the disease, the relative invasiveness of endoscopic procedures often used as part of screening, and the lack of a clear survival benefit. Implications Pancreatic cancer has been slower to move toward genomic testing, partially because of a lower prevalence of mutations and partially because of a limited effect of results on treatment choices outside a clinical trial. This is an area of active investigation, and we anticipate that there will be both preventive and therapeutic implications of driver mutations in the coming decade.

1501 Background: The aim of this study is to assess the prevalence of known heritable germline mutations in unselected PDAC patients and to determine how well current guidelines for genetic testing identify mutation carriers. Methods: Consecutive, unselected patients with recently diagnosed PDAC from three centers were enrolled from May to December 2016 in an ongoing prospective study. A three-generation pedigree was obtained. Germline mutations in 12 genes associated with PDAC risk ( APC, ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, PALB2, PMS2, STK11, TP53) and in 19 genes related to other cancer risks were screened for by NGS. American College of Gastroenterology and NCCN criteria for genetic testing for BRCA1/2, Lynch syndrome, and Familial Pancreatic Cancer (FPC) were assessed. Results: Among 183 patients, 46% are female, 79% are Caucasian and 10% are Ashkenazi Jewish, with median (IQR) age 68 (62,75) years at diagnosis. 41% of patients met ³1 criteria for genetic testing (35.5% BRCA1/2, 2.7% Lynch, 9.3% FPC). Twenty patients (11%) were found to have a total of 21 pathogenic mutations (table). Mutation status was not associated with age at diagnosis, sex, or personal history of cancer (all p > 0.05). Six mutation carriers (30% of positives) did not meet current criteria for genetic testing. Conclusions: Preliminary results show that 6.6% of unselected PDAC patients carry a germline mutation in a gene known to increase PDAC risk and 4.3% have a mutation in genes not previously linked to PDAC. Existing testing criteria did not identify 30% of carriers. Continued refinement of guidelines is necessary to align genetic testing with inherited PDAC risk. Clinical trial information: NCT02790944. [Table: see text]

Background Psychiatric and neuropsychological side effects of subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation have been increasingly recognized. Most programming regimens focus on contacts 0 and 1, whereas contact 3, which often is located near or in the zona incerta (ZI), is usually not used. The question of whether ZI stimulation may limit limbic effects has not been answered. Objective To examine the effects of short-term stimulation near or in the ZI (contact 3) compared with stimulation of the STN using standard trajectories and targeting as measured by limbic and motor functions. Methods Motor and limbic functions of 11 patients with STN DBS were assessed with the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale-3, structured gait video analysis, Visual Analog Scale mood scales, task testing of impulsivity, and facial recognition under routine STN programming and under stimulation in or near the ZI. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the location of contact 3 near or in the ZI. Results Data analysis with repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed that motor scores remained stable with both stimulation settings, with specific improvements in finger taps (P = .02) and rapid alternating movements (P = .03) in ZI stimulation. Stimulation near or in the ZI led to a decrease in self- reported anxiety and depression (P = .03 for both) and an improvement in fear recognition (P = .02). Conclusion We provide preliminary evidence that stimulation in or near the ZI results in maintained motor function while improving self-reported depression and anxiety in patients with bilateral STN DBS. Stimulation in or near the ZI may provide a useful programming setting for patients prone to psychiatric side effects.

Background: Randomized controlled studies have shown deep brain stimulation (DBS) to be an effective treatment for Parkinson’s disease (PD). Outside of large-center studies, little is known about trends in DBS use in the USA. Objectives: We employ the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to look at changes in DBS utilization over time. Methods: We identified all individuals with PD (332.0) and essential tremor (ET) (333.1) who underwent DBS (02.93) from 1998 to 2007. We examined demographics, hospital status, comorbidities, and in-hospital systemic/technical complications. DBS patients from 2000 and 2007 were compared using χ2 tests. Results: PD patients from the 2007 sample who underwent DBS were older (p = 0.01). Both ET and PD patients had significantly more comorbidities in 2007 (p < 0.001). In-hospital complications decreased from 3.8 to 2.8%. DBS was performed in medium- or high-volume centers in 70% of cases in 2000 and in 50% in 2007. In all groups, a majority of cases (range 65–71%) underwent DBS at hospitals in the western and southern USA. Conclusions: Patients who underwent DBS in the 2007 sample were older and had more comorbidities than those in the 2000 sample; in-hospital complications remained low. Understanding trends in DBS is helpful in assessing how the technology is adopted and what relationships should be further explored.