1. Deep MRD profiling defines outcome and unveils different modes of treatment resistance in standard and high risk myeloma
- Author
-
Goicoechea I, Puig N, Cedena MT, Burgos L, Cordón L, Vidriales MB, Flores-Montero J, Gutierrez NC, Calasanz MJ, Martin Ramos ML, Lara-Astiaso D, Vilas-Zornoza A, Alignani D, Rodriguez I, Sarvide S, Alameda D, Garcés JJG, Rodriguez S, Fresquet V, Celay J, Garcia-Sanz R, Martinez-Lopez J, Oriol A, Rios R, Martin-Sanchez J, Martinez-Martinez R, Sarra J, Hernandez MT, de la Rubia J, Krsnik I, Moraleda JM, Palomera L, Bargay J, Martinez-Climent JA, Orfao A, Rosiñol L, Mateos MV, Lahuerta JJ, Blade J, San Miguel J, and Paiva B
- Subjects
body regions ,hemic and lymphatic diseases - Abstract
Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) carrying high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (CA) have inferior outcome despite achieving similar complete response (CR) rates when compared to cases with standard-risk CA. This questions the legitimacy of CR as treatment endpoint for high-risk MM, and represents a biological conundrum regarding the nature of tumor reservoirs persisting after therapy in patients with standard- and high-risk CA. Here, we used next-generation flow (NGF) to evaluate measurable residual disease (MRD) in MM patients with standard- (N=300) vs high-risk CA (N=90) enrolled in the PETHEMA/GEM2012MENOS65 trial (NCT01916252), and to identify mechanisms determining MRD resistance in both patient subgroups (N=40). The 36-month progression-free and overall survival rates were higher than 90% in patients with undetectable MRD, with no significant differences (P=0.202) between cases having standard- vs high-risk CA. Persistent MRD resulted in median progression-free survival of approximately three and two years in patients with standard- and high-risk CA, respectively (P
- Published
- 2020