Author: "Martina Stauch" - Searchworks@Jio Institute Digital Library Search Results

Your search keyword '"Martina Stauch"' showing total 103 results

Start Over Author "Martina Stauch"

103 results on '"Martina Stauch"'

1. S200: IBRUTINIB VERSUS PLACEBO IN PATIENTS WITH ASYMPTOMATIC, TREATMENT-NAÏVE EARLY STAGE CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA (CLL): FINAL RESULTS OF THE PHASE 3, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED CLL12 TRIAL

Author: Petra Langerbeins, Sandra Robrecht, Pascal Nieper, Paula Cramer, Moritz Fürstenau, Othman Al-Sawaf, Anna-Maria Fink, Karl-Anton Kreuzer, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Eugen Tausch, Christof Schneider, Lothar Müller, Michael Eckart, Rudolf Schlag, Werner Freier, Tobias Gaska, Christina Balser, Marcel Reiser, Martina Stauch, Clemens Wendtner, Kirsten Fischer, Stephan Stilgenbauer, Barbara Eichhorst, and Michael Hallek
Subjects: Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs, RC633-647.5
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

2. Outcome of advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia following different first-line and relapse therapies: a meta-analysis of five prospective trials by the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG)

Author: Paula Cramer, Susanne Isfort, Jasmin Bahlo, Stephan Stilgenbauer, Hartmut Döhner, Manuela Bergmann, Martina Stauch, Michael Kneba, Elisabeth Lange, Petra Langerbeins, Natali Pflug, Gabor Kovacs, Valentin Goede, Anna-Maria Fink, Thomas Elter, Kirsten Fischer, Clemens-Martin Wendtner, Michael Hallek, and Barbara Eichhorst
Subjects: Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs, RC633-647.5
Abstract: To evaluate the effect of first-line and subsequent therapies, the outcome of 1,558 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia from five prospective phase II/III trials conducted between 1999 and 2010 was analyzed. The 3-year overall survival rate was higher after first-line treatment with chemoimmunotherapies such as fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (87.9%) or bendamustine/rituximab (90.7%) compared to chemotherapies without an antibody (fludarabine/cyclophosphamide: 84.6%; fludarabine: 77.5%; chlorambucil: 77.4%). Furthermore, the median overall survival was longer in patients receiving at least one antibody-containing regimen in any treatment line (94.4 months) compared to the survival in patients who never received an antibody (84.3 months, P24 months after first-line therapy repeated the first-line regimen. Among 315 patients requiring treatment ≤24 months after first-line therapy, cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone with or without rituximab as well as alemtuzumab were the most commonly used therapies. In these early relapsing patients, the median overall survival was shorter following therapies containing an anthracycline and/or three or more cytotoxic agents (e.g. cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone or fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/mitoxantrone, 30.0 months) compared to single agent chemotherapy (e.g. fludarabine; 39.6 months) and standard chemoimmunotherapy (e.g. fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab: 61.6 months). In conclusion, the analysis confirms the superior efficacy of chemoimmunotherapies in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Moreover, the use of aggressive chemo(immuno)therapy combinations in patients with an early relapse does not offer any benefit when compared to less intensive therapies. Trial identifier: NCT00281918, ISRCTN75653261, ISRCTN36294212, NCT00274989 and NCT00147901.
Published: 2015
Full Text: View/download PDF

3. Interactions between comorbidity and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results of German Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Study Group trials

Author: Valentin Goede, Paula Cramer, Raymonde Busch, Manuela Bergmann, Martina Stauch, Georg Hopfinger, Stephan Stilgenbauer, Hartmut Döhner, Anne Westermann, Clemens M. Wendtner, Barbara Eichhorst, and Michael Hallek
Subjects: Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs, RC633-647.5
Abstract: This study investigated the impact of comorbidity in 555 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia enrolled in two trials of the German Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Study Group on first-line treatment with fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, or chlorambucil. Patients with two or more comorbidities and patients with less than two comorbidities differed in overall survival (71.7 versus 90.2 months; P
Published: 2014
Full Text: View/download PDF

4. eTable 1 from Amphiregulin Expression Is a Predictive Biomarker for EGFR Inhibition in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Combined Analysis of Three Randomized Trials

Author: Volker Heinemann, Andreas Jung, Thomas Kirchner, Jens Neumann, Markus Moehler, Thomas Decker, Swantje Held, Alexander Kiani, Martina Stauch, Andreas Schalhorn, Nicolas Moosmann, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Florian Kaiser, Boryana Ivanova, Christine Kapaun, Clemens Giessen-Jung, Ingrid Ricard, Dominik P. Modest, Sebastian Stintzing, and Arndt Stahler
Abstract: Normalized AREG expression according to baseline characteristics.
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

5. eTable 3 from Amphiregulin Expression Is a Predictive Biomarker for EGFR Inhibition in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Combined Analysis of Three Randomized Trials

Author: Volker Heinemann, Andreas Jung, Thomas Kirchner, Jens Neumann, Markus Moehler, Thomas Decker, Swantje Held, Alexander Kiani, Martina Stauch, Andreas Schalhorn, Nicolas Moosmann, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Florian Kaiser, Boryana Ivanova, Christine Kapaun, Clemens Giessen-Jung, Ingrid Ricard, Dominik P. Modest, Sebastian Stintzing, and Arndt Stahler
Abstract: Outcome according to high vs. low unnormalized AREG expression in all patients and subgroups
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

6. Data from Amphiregulin Expression Is a Predictive Biomarker for EGFR Inhibition in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Combined Analysis of Three Randomized Trials

Author: Volker Heinemann, Andreas Jung, Thomas Kirchner, Jens Neumann, Markus Moehler, Thomas Decker, Swantje Held, Alexander Kiani, Martina Stauch, Andreas Schalhorn, Nicolas Moosmann, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Florian Kaiser, Boryana Ivanova, Christine Kapaun, Clemens Giessen-Jung, Ingrid Ricard, Dominik P. Modest, Sebastian Stintzing, and Arndt Stahler
Abstract: Purpose:Amphiregulin (AREG) and epiregulin (EREG) are ligands of EGFR. Predictive information for anti-EGFR treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was observed, but data for other agents is limited.Experimental Design:Ligand mRNA expression; RAS, BRAF, PIK3CA mutations; and EGFR expression were assessed by qRT-PCR, pyrosequencing, and IHC, respectively, in mCRC tumor tissue of patients participating in the randomized controlled trials FIRE-1, CIOX, and FIRE-3. Normalized mRNA expression was dichotomized using median and third quartile. Overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by Kaplan–Meier method including univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Penalized spline regression analysis tested interaction of mRNA expression and outcome.Results:Of 688 patients with available material, high AREG expression was detected in 343 (>median) and 172 (>3rd quartile) patients. High AREG expression was associated with significantly higher OS [26.2 vs. 21.5 months, HR = 0.80; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.68–0.94; P = 0.007], PFS (10.0 vs. 8.1 months, HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63–0.86; P = 0.001), and objective response rate (63.1% vs. 51.6%, P = 0.004) compared to low expression at both threshold values. This effect remained significant in multivariate Cox regression analysis (OS: P = 0.01, PFS: P = 0.002). High AREG mRNA expression interacted significantly with the efficacy of cetuximab compared with bevacizumab (OS: P = 0.02, PFS: P = 0.04) in RAS WT mCRC.Conclusions:High AREG mRNA expression is a favorable prognostic biomarker for mCRC which interacted significantly with efficacy of anti-EGFR treatment.
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

7. eTable 2 from Amphiregulin Expression Is a Predictive Biomarker for EGFR Inhibition in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Combined Analysis of Three Randomized Trials

Author: Volker Heinemann, Andreas Jung, Thomas Kirchner, Jens Neumann, Markus Moehler, Thomas Decker, Swantje Held, Alexander Kiani, Martina Stauch, Andreas Schalhorn, Nicolas Moosmann, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Florian Kaiser, Boryana Ivanova, Christine Kapaun, Clemens Giessen-Jung, Ingrid Ricard, Dominik P. Modest, Sebastian Stintzing, and Arndt Stahler
Abstract: Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses for overall and progression-free survival in all patients.
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

8. eFigure 4 from Amphiregulin Expression Is a Predictive Biomarker for EGFR Inhibition in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Combined Analysis of Three Randomized Trials

Author: Volker Heinemann, Andreas Jung, Thomas Kirchner, Jens Neumann, Markus Moehler, Thomas Decker, Swantje Held, Alexander Kiani, Martina Stauch, Andreas Schalhorn, Nicolas Moosmann, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Florian Kaiser, Boryana Ivanova, Christine Kapaun, Clemens Giessen-Jung, Ingrid Ricard, Dominik P. Modest, Sebastian Stintzing, and Arndt Stahler
Abstract: Forest plot of individual trial analysis of high versus low amphiregulin (AREG) mRNA expression dichotomized by median and 3rd quartile showing (A) hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for overall survival and (B) hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for progression-free survival
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

9. Efficacy of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab vs FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in 1st-line treatment of older patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: an analysis of the randomised trial FIRE-3

Author: Laura E. Fischer, Sebastian Stintzing, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Dominik P. Modest, Thomas Decker, Alexander Kiani, Florian Kaiser, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran, Tobias Heintges, Christian Lerchenmüller, Christoph Kahl, Gernot Seipelt, Frank Kullmann, Martina Stauch, Werner Scheithauer, Clemens Giessen-Jung, Jens Uhlig, Bettina Peuser, Claudio Denzlinger, Arndt Stahler, Lena Weiss, Kathrin Heinrich, Swantje Held, Andreas Jung, Thomas Kirchner, and Volker Heinemann
Subjects: Cancer Research, Rectal Neoplasms, Leucovorin, Cetuximab, Bevacizumab, Oncology, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Colonic Neoplasms, Humans, Camptothecin, Fluorouracil, Colorectal Neoplasms, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Abstract: Summary Background The evidence on the efficacy of anticancer therapy is limited in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This retrospective analysis of phase III FIRE-3 trial assesses the efficacy of FOLFIRI plus either cetuximab or bevacizumab according to the patients’ age and sidedness of primary tumour. Methods The study endpoints overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between younger ( Results Overall, older patients with RAS WT tumours had a significantly shorter OS when compared to younger patients (25.9 months vs 29.3 months, HR 1.29; P = 0.02). Also the proportion of right-sided tumours was significantly greater in older patients (27.1% vs 17.9%; P = 0.029). Secondary resection rates were numerically higher in younger patients (25.4% vs. 17.6%, P = 0.068) than in older patients. This was primarily seen in the Cetuximab arm, where older patients underwent less likely resection (13.1% vs. 26%; P = 0.02). Older patients with left-sided tumours showed only a trend towards greater efficacy of cetuximab (HR 0.86; P = 0.38). In patients with right-sided primary tumours, older patients did not appear to benefit from cetuximab in contrast to younger patients (≥65 years: 16.6 months vs 23.6 months, HR 1.1; P = 0.87; P = 0.31). Conclusions In FIRE-3, OS was generally shorter in older patients in comparison to younger patients. This could be explained by the overrepresentation of right-sided tumours and a lower secondary resection rate in older patients. The efficacy of targeted therapy was dependent on tumour sidedness in older patients with RAS WT mCRC. Clinical trial FIRE-3 (NCT00433927).
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

10. The CLL12 trial: ibrutinib vs placebo in treatment-naïve, early-stage chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Author: Anna-Maria Fink, Tobias Gaska, Barbara Eichhorst, Werner Freier, Clemens-Martin Wendtner, Can Zhang, Julia von Tresckow, Kirsten Fischer, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Eugen Tausch, Stephan Stilgenbauer, Marcel Reiser, Martina Stauch, Michael J. Eckart, Sandra Robrecht, Petra Langerbeins, Moritz Fürstenau, Paula Cramer, Rudolf Schlag, Lothar Müller, Karl-Anton Kreuzer, Michael Hallek, Christina Balser, and Othman Al-Sawaf
Subjects: Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Immunology, Medizin, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Placebo, Biochemistry, Asymptomatic, chemistry.chemical_compound, Double-Blind Method, Piperidines, Median follow-up, Internal medicine, Clinical endpoint, medicine, Humans, Adverse effect, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, business.industry, Adenine, Hazard ratio, Cell Biology, Hematology, Middle Aged, Placebo Effect, Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell, Rash, chemistry, Ibrutinib, Disease Progression, Female, medicine.symptom, business
Abstract: Observation is the current standard of care for patients with early-stage asymptomatic chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), as chemotherapy-based interventions have failed to prolong survival. We hypothesized that early intervention with ibrutinib would be well tolerated and lead to superior disease control in a subgroup of early-stage patients with CLL. The phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled CLL12 trial randomly assigned asymptomatic, treatment-naïve Binet stage A CLL patients at increased risk of progression in a 1:1 ratio to receive ibrutinib (n = 182) or placebo (n = 181) at a dose of 420 mg daily. At a median follow-up of 31 months, the study met its primary endpoint by significantly improving event-free survival in the ibrutinib group (median, not reached vs 47.8 months; hazard ratio = 0.25; 95% confidence interval = 0.14-0.43, P < .0001). Compared with placebo, ibrutinib did not increase overall toxicity, yielding similar incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). The most common serious AEs were atrial fibrillation, pneumonia, and rash in the ibrutinib group, and basal cell carcinoma, pneumonia, and myocardial infarction in the placebo group. Ibrutinib-associated risk for bleeding (33.5%) was decreased by prohibiting the use of oral anticoagulants through an amendment of the study protocol and by avoiding CYP3A4 drug–drug interactions. Ibrutinib confirms efficacy in CLL patients at an early stage with an increased risk of progression. However, the results do not justify changing the current standard of “watch and wait.” This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02863718.
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

11. Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) with Eltrombopag - Results of the 5th Interim Analysis of the Study RISA, with Special Consideration of Treatment Discontinuations

Author: Oliver Meyer, Rudolf Schlag, Thomas Stauch, Bastian Fleischmann, Marcel Reiser, Dietrich Kaempfe, Timo Behlendorf, Manfred Welslau, Eyck von der Heyde, Steffen Dörfel, Claudia Willy, and Martina Stauch
Subjects: Immunology, Cell Biology, Hematology, Biochemistry
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

12. Quality of life and outcome of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving first‐line chemotherapy with nab‐paclitaxel and gemcitabine: Real‐life results from the prospective <scp>QOLIXANE</scp> trial of the Platform for Outcome, Quality of Life and Translational Research on Pancreatic Cancer registry

Author: Jens Papke, Holger Schulz, Alexander Reichart, Jürgen Wehmeyer, Eike Gallmeier, Petra Büchner-Steudel, Martin Wolf, Lutz Jacobasch, Jan Wierecky, Klaus-Ulrich Däßler, Mark-Oliver Zahn, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran, Hans-Detlev Harich, Jörg Weniger, Lars Hahn, U. R. Peters, Dirk Behringer, Daniel Pink, Hans-Peter Feustel, Heinz-Gert Höffkes, Thomas Fietz, Marina Schaaf, Matthias Groschek, Claudia Pauligk, Arndt Vogel, Oliver Waidmann, Jens Uhlig, Steffen Dörfel, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, G. Schuch, Wolfgang Blau, Helmut Forstbauer, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Martina Stauch, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie, Stephan Bildat, Jörg Schubert, Stefan Mahlmann, Michael Koenigsmann, Rudolf Schlag, Henning Eschenburg, Jörg Trojan, Albrecht Kretzschmar, Volker Kunzmann, Uwe Schwindel, Caroline Schönherr, Karin Waibel, Nils Homann, Ali Aldaoud, Thorsten Oliver Götze, Gerrit zur Hausen, Gabriele Margareta Siegler, Christoph Springfeld, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Helmut Messmann, Marcus-A Wörns, and Thomas J. Ettrich
Subjects: Cancer Research, Chemotherapy, medicine.medical_specialty, Proportional hazards model, business.industry, medicine.medical_treatment, Hazard ratio, Disease, medicine.disease, humanities, Confidence interval, Gemcitabine, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Oncology, Quality of life, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Internal medicine, Pancreatic cancer, medicine, business, medicine.drug
Abstract: Few data exist on health-related quality of life (QoL) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) receiving first-line chemotherapy (Awad L ZE, Mesbah M Boston, MA. Applying survival data methodology to analyze quality of life data, in Mesbah M, Cole BF, Ting Lee M-L (eds): Statistical Methods for Quality of Life Studies: Design, Measurements and Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002). The QOLIXANE study is a prospective, noninterventional, multicenter substudy of the Platform for Outcome, Quality of Life and Translational Research on Pancreatic Cancer (PARAGON) registry, which evaluated QoL in patients with mPC receiving first-line gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy in real-life setting. QoL was prospectively measured via EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires at baseline and every month thereafter. Therapy and efficacy parameters were prospectively collected. Main objectives were the rate of patients without deterioration of Global Health Status/QoL (GHS/QoL) at 3 and 6 months. Six hundred patients were enrolled in 95 German study sites. Median progression-free survival was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2-6.3). Median overall survival (OS) was 8.9 months (95% CI, 7.9-10.2), while median time to deterioration of GHS/QoL was 4.7 months (95% CI, 4.0-5.6). With a baseline GHS/QoL score of 46 (SD, 22.8), baseline QoL of the patients was severely impaired, in most cases due to loss in role functioning and fatigue. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, 61% and 41% of patients had maintained GHS/QoL after 3 and 6 months, respectively. However, in the QoL response analysis, 35% and 19% of patients had maintained (improved or stable) GHS/QoL after 3 and 6 months, respectively, while 14% and 9% had deteriorated GHS/QoL with the remaining patients being nonevaluable. In the Cox regression analysis, GHS/QoL scores strongly predicted survival with a hazard ratio of 0.86 (P < .0001). Patients with mPC have poor QoL at baseline that deteriorates within a median of 4.7 months. Treatment with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel is associated with maintained QoL in relevant proportions of patients. However, overall, results remain poor, reflecting the aggressive nature of the disease.
Published: 2020
Full Text: View/download PDF

13. Treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) with Eltrombopag – results of the 3 rd interim analysis of the German non-interventional trial RISA. Focussing on steroid-pretreatment and fatigue

Author: D Kämpfe, N Ballerstädt, Rudolf Schlag, P Stark-Lorenzen, E von der Heyde, Oliver Meyer, A Josting, Martina Stauch, Margarete Plath, and M. Reiser
Subjects: medicine.medical_specialty, chemistry.chemical_compound, chemistry, business.industry, Internal medicine, Non interventional, medicine, Eltrombopag, Interim analysis, business, Immune thrombocytopenia
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

14. Randomized study to investigate FOLFOXIRI plus either bevacizumab or cetuximab as first-line treatment of BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC : The phase-II FIRE-4.5 study (AIO KRK-0116)

Author: Kathrin Heinrich, Julien Taieb, Jan Euker, Dominik Paul Modest, David Tougeron, Sebastian Stintzing, Rudolf Pihusch, Christof Burkart, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Anke Reinacher-Schick, Martina Stauch, Beate Krammer-Steiner, Gerald W. Prager, Christian Mueller, Ingo Schwaner, Florian Kaiser, Volker Heinemann, Stefan Kasper, Meinolf Karthaus, and Christoph Kahl
Subjects: Oncology, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, FOLFOXIRI, Bevacizumab, Cetuximab, Colorectal cancer, business.industry, Medizin, medicine.disease, law.invention, BRAF V600E, First line treatment, Randomized controlled trial, law, Internal medicine, medicine, business, medicine.drug
Abstract: 3502 Background: FIRE-4.5 (AIO KRK-0116) compared FOLFOXIRI plus either cetuximab or bevacizumab in BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients not treated for metastatic disease before. Methods: Within this 1:2 randomized, controlled, open-label phase-II study, patients received FOLFOXIRI every two weeks at the following schedule: irinotecan 150mg/m² (30-90min, day 1), folinic acid 400mg/m² (120min, day 1), oxaliplatin 85mg/m² (120 min, day 1), followed by 5-fluorouracil 3,000 mg/m², 48h. FOLFOXIRI was combined with either bevacizumab (arm A) at a dose of 5mg/kg body weight, every 2 weeks or cetuximab (arm B) at a loading dose of 400mg/m² and subsequent weekly doses of 250mg/m². FOLFOXIRI was applied for a maximum of 12 cycles before maintenance treatment was recommended. Primary endpoint was superiority of Arm B with respect to overall response rate (ORR) according to RECIST 1.1 criterions. Secondary endpoints included PFS, OS, and tolerability. Results: From November 2016 to December 2020 108 patients were randomized in 90 German and 10 French centers (35 arm A and 73 in arm B). No new or unexpected toxicities were observed. Primary endpoint was not met with an ORR of 66.7% and 52.0% (p =0.23) in the respective arms. Median PFS was significantly longer in arm A vs arm B (8.3 months vs 5.9 months; logrank p = 0.03; HR 1.8). While OS data is still immature, median OS time are comparable at the time of analysis. Patients with left-sided primary tumors had comparable results with either bevacizumab or cetuximab, whereas those with right-sided primary tumors showed a trend towards better efficacy of the bevacizumab combination. Updated results will be presented at the annual meeting. Conclusions: FIRE-4.5 is the first prospective and randomized study investigating efficacy of FOLFOXIRI combined with targeted therapy in the first-line treatment of BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC. FOLFOXIRI plus either bevacizumab or cetuximab have comparable efficacy with differential effects according to primary tumor sidedness supporting the heterogeneity of BRAF V600E-mutant subpopulation of mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT04034459.
Published: 2021

15. Amphiregulin Expression Is a Predictive Biomarker for

Author: Arndt, Stahler, Sebastian, Stintzing, Dominik P, Modest, Ingrid, Ricard, Clemens, Giessen-Jung, Christine, Kapaun, Boryana, Ivanova, Florian, Kaiser, Ludwig, Fischer von Weikersthal, Nicolas, Moosmann, Andreas, Schalhorn, Martina, Stauch, Alexander, Kiani, Swantje, Held, Thomas, Decker, Markus, Moehler, Jens, Neumann, Thomas, Kirchner, Andreas, Jung, and Volker, Heinemann
Subjects: Adult, Male, Cetuximab, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Amphiregulin, ErbB Receptors, Survival Rate, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Metastasis, Colorectal Neoplasms, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Abstract: Amphiregulin (Ligand mRNA expression;Of 688 patients with available material, highHigh
Published: 2020

16. Quality of life and outcome of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy with nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine: Real-life results from the prospective QOLIXANE trial of the Platform for Outcome, Quality of Life and Translational Research on Pancreatic Cancer registry

Author: Salah-Eddin, Al-Batran, Ralf-Dieter, Hofheinz, Alexander, Reichart, Claudia, Pauligk, Caroline, Schönherr, Rudolf, Schlag, Gabriele, Siegler, Steffen, Dörfel, Michael, Koenigsmann, Mark-Oliver, Zahn, Jörg, Schubert, Ali, Aldaoud, Heinz-Gert, Höffkes, Holger, Schulz, Lars, Hahn, Jens, Uhlig, Wolfgang, Blau, Martina, Stauch, Jörg, Weniger, Martin, Wolf, Lutz, Jacobasch, Stephan, Bildat, Jürgen, Wehmeyer, Nils, Homann, Jörg, Trojan, Oliver, Waidmann, Thomas, Fietz, Hans-Peter, Feustel, Matthias, Groschek, Jan, Wierecky, Karin, Waibel, Stefan, Mahlmann, Uwe, Schwindel, Uwe, Peters, Gunter, Schuch, Daniel, Pink, Henning, Eschenburg, Marcus-A, Wörns, Hans-Detlev, Harich, Ludwig Fischer, von Weikersthal, Klaus-Ulrich, Däßler, Dirk M, Behringer, Helmut, Messmann, Albrecht, Kretzschmar, Eike, Gallmeier, Helmut, Forstbauer, Volker, Kunzmann, Jens, Papke, Petra, Büchner-Steudel, Ursula, Vehling-Kaiser, Christoph, Springfeld, Arndt, Vogel, Thomas J, Ettrich, Marina, Schaaf, Gerrit Zur, Hausen, and Thorsten Oliver, Götze
Subjects: Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Paclitaxel, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Deoxycytidine, Gemcitabine, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Treatment Outcome, Albumins, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Quality of Life, Humans, Female, Registries, Aged
Abstract: Few data exist on health-related quality of life (QoL) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) receiving first-line chemotherapy (Awad L ZE, Mesbah M Boston, MA. Applying survival data methodology to analyze quality of life data, in Mesbah M, Cole BF, Ting Lee M-L (eds): Statistical Methods for Quality of Life Studies: Design, Measurements and Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002). The QOLIXANE study is a prospective, noninterventional, multicenter substudy of the Platform for Outcome, Quality of Life and Translational Research on Pancreatic Cancer (PARAGON) registry, which evaluated QoL in patients with mPC receiving first-line gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy in real-life setting. QoL was prospectively measured via EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires at baseline and every month thereafter. Therapy and efficacy parameters were prospectively collected. Main objectives were the rate of patients without deterioration of Global Health Status/QoL (GHS/QoL) at 3 and 6 months. Six hundred patients were enrolled in 95 German study sites. Median progression-free survival was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2-6.3). Median overall survival (OS) was 8.9 months (95% CI, 7.9-10.2), while median time to deterioration of GHS/QoL was 4.7 months (95% CI, 4.0-5.6). With a baseline GHS/QoL score of 46 (SD, 22.8), baseline QoL of the patients was severely impaired, in most cases due to loss in role functioning and fatigue. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, 61% and 41% of patients had maintained GHS/QoL after 3 and 6 months, respectively. However, in the QoL response analysis, 35% and 19% of patients had maintained (improved or stable) GHS/QoL after 3 and 6 months, respectively, while 14% and 9% had deteriorated GHS/QoL with the remaining patients being nonevaluable. In the Cox regression analysis, GHS/QoL scores strongly predicted survival with a hazard ratio of 0.86 (P .0001). Patients with mPC have poor QoL at baseline that deteriorates within a median of 4.7 months. Treatment with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel is associated with maintained QoL in relevant proportions of patients. However, overall, results remain poor, reflecting the aggressive nature of the disease.
Published: 2020

17. Die Bedeutung der Persönlichkeitsentwicklung im Enterprise Transformation Cycle

Author: Martina Stauch
Abstract: Die menschliche Komponente ist in Bezug auf grose Veranderungen, wie sie eine Transformation im Unternehmen mit sich bringt, den grosten Herausforderungen ausgesetzt. In solchen Prozessen sind die Geschaftsfuhrung und das Fuhrungsteam besonders gefordert, einen fur ihr Unternehmen richtigen Weg zu finden und diesen auch so einzuschlagen, dass die Mitarbeiter diesen auch mitgehen konnen. Ein Verfahren, dass die dafur erforderliche Personlichkeitsentwicklung von Mitarbeitern und Fuhrungsriege fordert, baut auf der sogenannten Systemtheorie auf. Sie ist ein Denkansatz in dem es um Gesamtheiten geht, die der Gefahr entgegen wirken, sich in Einzelheiten zu verlieren. Das gesamte System wird als Einheit verstanden, die durch Wechselwirkung der Elemente untereinander etwas Neues schafft, was mehr Potenzial hat als die Summe der einzelnen Elemente. Dieses neu gewonnene Potenzial ist ein wichtiger Treiber fur neue Ideen und Kreativitat, um eine Transformation erfolgreich umzusetzen.
Published: 2020
Full Text: View/download PDF

18. IBRUTINIB VERSUS PLACEBO IN PATIENTS WITH ASYMPTOMATIC, TREATMENT-NAÏVE EARLY STAGE CLL: PRIMARY ENDPOINT RESULTS OF THE PHASE 3 DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED CLL12 TRIAL

Author: Othman Al-Sawaf, Barbara Eichhorst, A. M. Fink, P. Cramer, C. Rhein, Jasmin Bahlo, Eugen Tausch, H. Gerwin, Werner Freier, Stephan Stilgenbauer, P. Langerbeins, M. Reiser, Lutz P. Müller, J. von Tresckow, Martina Stauch, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Tobias Gaska, Christina Balser, Michael J. Eckart, Michael Hallek, Kirsten Fischer, Moritz Fürstenau, Clemens-Martin Wendtner, Rudolf Schlag, and Karl-Anton Kreuzer
Subjects: Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, business.industry, Hematology, General Medicine, Placebo, Gastroenterology, Asymptomatic, Double blind, Therapy naive, chemistry.chemical_compound, Oncology, chemistry, Internal medicine, Ibrutinib, Clinical endpoint, Medicine, In patient, Stage (cooking), medicine.symptom, business
Published: 2019
Full Text: View/download PDF

19. Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) with Eltrombopag - Results of the 4 th Interim Analysis of the German Non-Interventional Trial RISA

Author: Oliver Meyer, Rudolf Schlag, Thomas Stauch, Bastian Fleischmann, Marcel Reiser, Dietrich Kaempfe, Timo Behlendorf, Manfred Welslau, Claudia Willy, and Martina Stauch
Subjects: Immunology, Cell Biology, Hematology, Biochemistry
Abstract: Background: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune disorder with increased platelet destruction and impaired platelet production. Patients present with bleeding complications of various severity. Another common symptom of ITP is fatigue, which can severely affect patient's quality of life. Eltrombopag (EPAG) is an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist, which is proved to be effective and safe in the treatment of ITP. In Europe, it is approved for the therapy of patients who were diagnosed with ITP at least 6 months ago and who have not responded to other treatments. Here we present data from the 4 th interim analysis of the RISA study. Methods: RISA is a prospective multicenter non-interventional trial in Germany. It was launched in December 2015, and it will be continued until December 2023. In accordance with the inclusion criteria, adults with persisting or chronic pITP (primary ITP) have been enrolled. Patients with pre-treatment could only be included if it was terminated 4 weeks prior to the patient's consent to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria comprised pregnancy, hepatitis C infection and severe aplastic anaemia. Dosage of EPAG and treatment of patients follows the SmPC and the routine of treating physicians. According to the study protocol, patient questionnaires must be completed at 0,1,3,6,9,12,18 and 24 months. Fatigue is assessed using the FACIT-F score, which includes a score range from 0 to 52, with score values Results: Data cutoff for this 4 th interim analysis was 23.02.2021. 275 patients were enrolled. 261 of them received at least one dose of EPAG and completed one post baseline assessment. Mean duration of participation was 5.2 years. Mean±SD age was 62.7±17.6 years. 54.8% of the patients were female. Median (range) duration of ITP at baseline was 5.3 (0.0-44.9) years. Comorbidity was present in 80.5% of all patients. 79 (28.7%) patients completed all scheduled visits before data cutoff. Median treatment duration was 395.0 days. Treatment with EPAG was carried out at a median dosage of 50 mg daily. In 255 patients, baseline platelet counts were available. The proportion of patients with a platelet count ≥50x10 9/L was 30.6% at baseline. With EPAG treatment, it increased to 75.4% within the first month (N=224) and to 89.0% within 24 months (N=73) from baseline. 12.6% of the patients who completed at least one assessment visit after baseline were pre-treated with the thrombopoietin receptor agonist romiplostim. Within this subgroup as well, platelet counts responded well to EPAG treatment. In 35.6% of patients, at least one bleeding event had occurred in the 12 months prior to baseline. During EPAG therapy, the incidence of bleeding events per patient year was reduced from 1.40 before baseline to 0.60 and 0.13 within the first and second treatment year respectively. This corresponds to a relative reduction in bleeding events of 57% and 91% respectively. Over the entire two years treatment period, the average incidence of bleeding events per patient year accounted for 0.44, which is 69% below the incidence at baseline. Bleeding events were mostly of low severity. (Tab.) Median FACIT-F score was 37.0 at baseline (N=202; mean 36.0±11.0) and 42.5 after 24 months (N=48; mean 38.1±12.1). This difference was not statistically significant. According to exploratory calculations, severity of fatigue was not correlated to platelet count, hemoglobin concentration or incidence of bleeding events. Discussion: In line with previously published randomized controlled trials (Birocchi et al. Platelets 2021), this non-interventional study confirmed the effectiveness of EPAG in adults with persistent or chronic ITP in a routine care setting. During treatment with EPAG, the prevalence and severity of thrombocytopenia, as well as the incidence of bleeding events, decreased. We could also confirm that fatigue is a significant issue in patients with ITP. A FACIT-F score of 37.0 is comparable to average score values in cancer patients (Montan et al. Value Health 2018). Under treatment with EPAG, we observed a decrease in fatigue that was clinically relevant but not statistically significant. Further research is needed to explore possible additional effects of EPAG, for example on fatigue. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Meyer: Swedish Orphan Biovitrum: Consultancy, Honoraria; Grifols: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria. Stauch: Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria. Willy: Novartis Pharma: Current Employment.
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

20. Prevalence and influence on outcome of HER2/neu, HER3 and NRG1 expression in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Author: Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Marlies Michl, Jobst C. von Einem, Andreas Jung, Thomas Kirchner, Julian Walter Holch, Andreas Schalhorn, Jens Neumann, Arndt Stahler, Sebastian Stintzing, D. Quietzsch, Stephan Kruger, Dominik Paul Modest, Alexander Crispin, Martina Stauch, Clemens Giessen-Jung, Volker Heinemann, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, and Michael J. Haas
Subjects: 0301 basic medicine, Oncology, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Organoplatinum Compounds, Receptor, ErbB-3, Receptor, ErbB-2, Colorectal cancer, Neuregulin-1, Leucovorin, Irinotecan, HER2/neu, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Internal medicine, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Biomarkers, Tumor, medicine, Humans, Pharmacology (medical), Neoplasm Metastasis, Retrospective Studies, Pharmacology, biology, business.industry, Hazard ratio, Retrospective cohort study, Prognosis, medicine.disease, Confidence interval, Oxaliplatin, Surgery, 030104 developmental biology, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, biology.protein, Biomarker (medicine), Camptothecin, Fluorouracil, Colorectal Neoplasms, business, medicine.drug
Abstract: Our aim was to explore the impact of the HER2/neu, HER3 receptor as well as their ligands' neuregulin (NRG1) expression on the outcome of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). NRG1, HER2/neu and HER3 expression was evaluated in 208 patients with mCRC receiving 5-FU/LV plus irinotecan or irinotecan plus oxaliplatin as the first-line treatment. Biomarker expression was correlated with the outcome of patients. NRG1 (low: 192 vs. high: 16), HER2/neu (low: 201 vs. high: 7) and HER3 (low: 69 vs. high: 139) expressions were assessed in 208 patients. High versus low NRG1 expression significantly affected progression-free survival (PFS) [4.7 vs. 8.2 months, hazard ratio (HR): 2.45; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.45-4.13; P=0.001], but not overall survival (OS) (15.5 vs. 20.7 months, HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.76-2.35; P=0.32). High versus low HER3 expression (PFS: 7.1 vs. 8.8 months, HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.82-1.50; P=0.50; OS: 19.8 vs. 21.1 months, HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.70-1.30; P=0.75) and high compared with low HER2/neu expression (PFS: 7.7 vs. 8.0 months, HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.71-1.60; P=0.75; OS: 16.6 vs. 21.1 months, HR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.75-1.71; P=0.57) did not influence outcome. High NRG1 expression was associated with inferior PFS in the FIRE-1 trial. We did not detect a prognostic impact of HER2/neu and HER3 overexpression in mCRC. The frequency of overexpression was comparable with other studies.
Published: 2017
Full Text: View/download PDF

21. Relation of early tumor shrinkage (ETS) observed in first‐line treatment to efficacy parameters of subsequent treatment in FIRE‐3 (AIOKRK0306)

Author: Andreas Jung, Markus Moehler, Werner Scheithauer, Tobias Heintges, Jobst C. von Einem, Martina Stauch, Christoph Kahl, Frank Kullmann, Swantje Held, Alexander Kiani, Thomas Kirchner, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran, Volker Heinemann, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Thomas Decker, Fire study investigators, Sebastian Stintzing, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Dominik Paul Modest, Christian A. Lerchenmuller, and G. Seipelt
Subjects: Adult, Male, 0301 basic medicine, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Bevacizumab, Colorectal cancer, Leucovorin, Cetuximab, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, medicine.disease_cause, Gastroenterology, Disease-Free Survival, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Internal medicine, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, medicine, Humans, Aged, Shrinkage, business.industry, Remission Induction, Tumor shrinkage, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Treatment Outcome, 030104 developmental biology, Oncology, Fluorouracil, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, FOLFIRI, Camptothecin, Female, KRAS, Colorectal Neoplasms, business, medicine.drug
Abstract: We explored the association of early tumor shrinkage (ETS) and non-ETS with efficacy of first-line and consecutive second-line treatment in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated in FIRE-3. Assessment of tumor shrinkage was based on the sum of longest diameters of target lesions, evaluated after 6 weeks of treatment. Shrinkage was classified as ETS (shrinkage by ≥ 20%), mETS (shrinkage by 0 to20%), mPD (minor progression0 to20%) and PD (progression ≥20%). Overall survival (OS) was 33.2 (95% CI 28.0-38.4) months in ETS patients, while non-ETS was associated with less favorable outcome (mETS 24.0 (95% CI 21.2-26.9) months, mPD 19.0 (95% CI 13.0-25.0) months, PD 12.8 (95% CI 11.1-14.5) months). Differences in PFS of first-line therapy were less pronounced. ETS subgroups defined in first-line therapy also correlated with efficacy of second-line therapy. Progression-free survival in second-line (PFS2nd) was 6.5 months (5.8-7.2) for ETS, and was 5.6 (95% CI 4.7-6.5) months for mETS, 4.9 (95% CI 3.7-6.1) months for mPD and 3.3 (95% CI 2.3-4.3) months for PD. PFS of first-line and PFS2nd showed a linear correlation (Bravais-Pearson coefficient: 0.16, p = 0.006). While ETS is associated with the most favorable outcome, non-ETS represents a heterogeneous subgroup with distinct characteristics of less favorable initial tumor response to treatment. This is the first analysis to demonstrate that early tumor response observed during first-line FOLFIRI-based therapy may also relate to efficacy of second-line treatment. Early response parameters may serve as stratification factors in trials recruiting pretreated patients.
Published: 2017
Full Text: View/download PDF

22. Treatment of Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) with Eltrombopag - Results of the 3rd Interim Analysis of the German Non-Interventional Trial RISA

Author: Andreas Josting, Dietrich Kaempfe, Nadine Ballerstädt, Petra Stark-Lorenzen, Oliver Meyer, Martina Stauch, Margarete Plath, Eyck von der Heyde, Rudolf Schlag, M. Reiser, and Axel Matzdorff
Subjects: medicine.medical_specialty, business.industry, Immunology, Eltrombopag, Cell Biology, Hematology, Interim analysis, Biochemistry, Clinical trial, chemistry.chemical_compound, chemistry, Prednisone, Internal medicine, Concomitant, medicine, Prednisolone, Rituximab, Adverse effect, business, medicine.drug
Abstract: Background:Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired autoimmune disorder, characterized by increased platelet destruction and impaired platelet production. Therefore, affected patients present with bleeding complications of various severity. However, another frequent complication of ITP is fatigue, which is often underestimated. In Europe the oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist Eltrombopag (EPAG) is licensed for the treatment of patients with persistent and chronic ITP who are refractory to previous treatments. EPAG has previously been shown to elevate platelet count and reduce bleeding complications in ITP patients, but the therapeutic effect on fatigue is unclear. Here we present data from the scheduled 3rd interim analysis of the RISA study. Methods:RISA is an ongoing, single-cohort, non-interventional, multicenter observational study. The individual follow-up period is approximately 24 months. Dosage of EPAG and treatment of patients follows the Summary of Product Characteristic (SmPC) or the routine of treating physicians. Fatigue is assessed at baseline and during the study using the FACIT-Fatigue Scale (Version 4). Annual interim analyses are performed to assess treatment effectiveness and safety. For this interim analysis, an evaluation of patients with prior application of Rituximab is planned. Results:210 patients received at least one dose of EPAG and completed one post baseline assessment. Mean±SD age was 63.1±17.4 years, median (range) duration of ITP was 5.6 (0.0- 44.9) years, 10% were splenectomized, 52.4% were female, median platelet count (range) at baseline was 33.5x109/L (0.0-270.0), 37.6% reported bleeding complications (any grade) within 12 months prior baseline (WHO °I 30% , °II 4.8% , °III 1.9% , °IV 0% , 1% grade missing), 85.2% received prior ITP therapy, and 81.4% had at least one concomitant disease. At least one pre-treatment was given to 179 patients. More than half received prednisolone (46.2%) or prednisone (9%) and 24.3% dexamethasone or immuno globulins (20%). Rituximab as pre-treatment was given to 2.9% of the patients but further analysis is not possible due to the small number. Mean±SD daily dose of EPAG was 45.1±14.4 mg. Treatment with EPAG increased median (range) platelet count to 90x109/L (2.0-617.0) within one month. After two years of treatment median (range) platelet count was 122 (9.0-335.0) (Fig. 1). After one month, 75% of the patients showed treatment response, after 24 months 89 % of the patients exhibited platelet counts above 50x109/L. At baseline mean±SD FACIT-Fatigue Score was 36.3±11.1 and remained unchanged during the two-year observation period (38.0±13.3) (Fig. 1). In a first subgroup analysis, 55 (31%) of 175 patients with an evaluable questionnaire at baseline suffered from severe fatigue (score A total of 166 patients (79%) reported any adverse events (AEs) (n=656), 57 patients (27.1%) experienced 126 serious AEs (SAEs) incl. 9 patients (4.3%) with 12 drug related SAEs. A total of 15 patients (7.1%) were reported to have experienced 27 events with fatal outcome. None of the fatal events was assessed causally related to EPAG. Within the first month of treatment 11 of 202 patients (5.4%) reported bleeding complications (any grade) and after two years 2 of 51 (3.9%). Eleven severe thromboembolic events were observed and 2 mild ones (4 severe and one mild related to EPAG). Discussion:In this 3rd interim analysis it was shown that therapy with EPAG increased the platelet count and reduced bleeding events. No new safety risks were reported despite many concomitant diseases and therapies in these patients. The analysis of the fatigue questionnaire revealed that ITP patients suffer from fatigue, similar to cancer patients and 31% of the patients suffered already from a severe fatigue at baseline. To date, the RISA study could not demonstrate that therapy with EPAG leads to a clinically significant improvement in fatigue. In Germany, ITP patients rarely receive Rituximab prior to EPAG despite their older age and comorbidities. This restrained use of Rituximab is in accordance with the current clinical guidance in Germany. The results in this non-interventional trial are in alignment with the outcomes of other clinical trials with EPAG. Figure Disclosures Meyer: Amgen GmbH:Honoraria;Novartis Pharma GmbH:Honoraria;Grifols Germany:Consultancy, Honoraria.Reiser:Celgene:Consultancy, Honoraria;Roche:Consultancy, Honoraria;BMS:Honoraria;CSL Behring:Honoraria.Plath:Novartis Pharma GmbH:Honoraria.Ballerstädt:Novartis Pharma GmbH:Current Employment.Stark-Lorenzen:Novartis Pharma GmbH:Current Employment.Matzdorff:Novartis Oncology:Consultancy, Other: Honoraria paid to institution;Amgen GmbH:Consultancy, Other: Honoraria paid to institution;Grifols Deutschland GmbH:Consultancy, Other: Honoraria paid to institution;Swedish Orphan Biovitrium GmbH:Consultancy, Other: Honoraria paid to institution;UCB Biopharma SRL:Consultancy, Other: Honoraria paid to institution;Roche Pharma AG:Other: Family stockownership. OffLabel Disclosure: Rituximab has not been licensed for the treatment of ITP and rituximab is not being, and is not intended to be, used to treat patients in this trial. However, some patients have been pretreated with rituximab outside this trial.
Published: 2020
Full Text: View/download PDF

23. High amphiregulin mRNA expression is a strong prognostic biomarker with response to cetuximab in FIRE-1, CIOX, and FIRE-3

Author: Martina Stauch, Andreas Schalhorn, Jens Neumann, Alexander Kiani, Christine Kapaun, Arndt Stahler, Ingrid Ricard, Thomas Kirchner, Boryana Ivanova, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Dominik Paul Modest, Volker Heinemann, and Sebastian Stintzing
Subjects: Oncology, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Cetuximab, business.industry, Colorectal cancer, Mrna expression, medicine.disease, Epiregulin, law.invention, Randomized controlled trial, Amphiregulin, law, Internal medicine, Medicine, Prognostic biomarker, business, medicine.drug
Abstract: 4026 Background: Amphiregulin ( AREG) and epiregulin ( EREG) were discussed as biomarkers for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Data from randomized controlled trials (RCT) are limited. Methods: AREG and EREG mRNA expression by RTqPCR in relation to housekeeping genes were available from 688 patients of three RCT (FIRE-1, n = 192, FUFIRI vs. mIrOx; CIOX, n = 113, cetuximab + CAPIRI/CAPOX; FIRE-3, n = 383, FOLFIRI+cetuximab/bevacizumab) and were normalized to their respective range of each trial with median and 3rd quartile as threshold values. Kaplan-Meier estimated overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cox regression analysis calculated hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Overall response rate (ORR) was compared by chi square test. Results: Across all trials, high AREG mRNA expression appeared as strong prognostic biomarker for OS, PFS and ORR for all threshold values. In RAS wildtype patients, high AREG expression was associated with better OS and PFS for cetuximab but not bevacizumab treatment. (Table) No effects were seen for epiregulin when all trials were analysed together. Conclusions: High AREG mRNA expression appeared as strong prognostic biomarker in mCRC. Positive predictive information might exist for cetuximab treatment. [Table: see text]
Published: 2020
Full Text: View/download PDF

24. Prognostic importance of primary tumor resection and synchronous metastasis on overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer: Data from the FIRE-3 (AIO KRK-0306) study

Author: Tobias Heintges, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Andreas Jung, Jobst C. von Einem, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran, Joerg Hielscher, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Thomas Decker, Werner Scheithauer, Volker Heinemann, Dominik Paul Modest, Christian A. Lerchenmuller, Alexander Kiani, Michael Scholz, Sebastian Stintzing, G. Seipelt, Christoph Kahl, Thomas Kirchner, and Martina Stauch
Subjects: Oncology, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Bevacizumab, Cetuximab, business.industry, Colorectal cancer, medicine.disease, Primary tumor, Multicenter trial, Internal medicine, Synchronous metastasis, medicine, Overall survival, FOLFIRI, business, medicine.drug
Abstract: 4070 Background: The FIRE-3 study (AIO KRK-0306) was designed as a randomized multicenter trial to compare the efficacy of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (cet) to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) as first-line treatment in KRAS WT mCRC patients. FOLFIRI plus cet as first-line treatment of KRAS WT mCRC patients resulted in comparable overall response rates (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) when compared to FOLFIRI plus bev. Overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in the FOLFIRI plus cet arm. Methods: In the present analysis of the FIRE-3 trial we explored the impact of primary tumor resection on outcome in relation to anti-EGFR vs. anti-VEGF treatment. Furthermore, we investigated the prognostic value of synchronous versus metachronous metastases. Results: In patients with synchronous disease no significant difference in OS was detected when comparing resected (n=339) vs. non-resected (n=97) patients (p-value: 0.29, HR: 1.17, 95%-CI: 0.88 – 1.55). In the cetuximab arm, resection (n=167) showed no significant benefit in OS when compared to non-resection (n=52) (p-value: 0.51, HR: 1.15, 95%-CI: 0.77 – 1.71). Treated with bevacizumab, similar results were present, when comparing resection (n=172) vs. non-resection (n=45); (p-value: 0.29, HR: 1.25, 95%-CI: 0.83 – 1.9). A strong trend was seen when comparing OS in treatment arms cet. (n=219) vs. bev. (n=217)) for patients with synchronous disease; (p-value: 0.05, HR: 1,26, 95%-CI: 1.0 - 1.59). 436/592 pts suffered from synchronous, 153/592 from metachronous disease (in 3/592 pts the information was not given). Median OS in pts with synchronous disease was 24.5 months and 29.5 in pts with metachronous disease (p-value: 0.02, HR: 0.76, 95%-CI: 0.6 - 0.96). In pts treated in the cetuximab arm metachronous disease (n=77) was associated with a trend towards longer OS when compared to synchronous disease (n= 219) (p-value: 0.13, HR: 0.76, 95%-CI: 0.54 – 1.1). The same effect was present in the bevacizumab arm (p-value: 0.05, HR: 0.73, 95%-CI 0.53 – 1.0) when comparing pts with synchronous disease (n=217) vs. pts. with metachronous disease (n=76). Conclusions: In the FIRE-3 study, metachronous disease was associated with superior OS compared to synchronous disease. This finding was accentuated in the bevacizumab arm. The role of resection of the primary tumor had no impact on survival. Clinical trial information: NCT00433927 .
Published: 2020
Full Text: View/download PDF

25. 4. CIO-Leadership in Zeiten der Disruption: Herausforderungen und Chancen für CIOs und ihre Teams

Author: Martina Stauch
Published: 2018
Full Text: View/download PDF

26. Influence of mRNA expression of epiregulin and amphiregulin on outcome of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with 5-FU/LV plus irinotecan or irinotecan plus oxaliplatin as first-line treatment (FIRE 1-trial)

Author: Andreas Schalhorn, Clemens Giessen-Jung, Dominik Paul Modest, Alexander Crispin, J. C. von Einem, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Jens Neumann, Arndt Stahler, Martina Stauch, Volker Heinemann, T. Kirchner, Sebastian Stintzing, Swantje Held, Andreas Jung, D. Quietzsch, L. Fischer von Weikersthal, and Julian Walter Holch
Subjects: 0301 basic medicine, Oncology, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Pathology, Colorectal cancer, medicine.medical_treatment, Epiregulin, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Amphiregulin, Internal medicine, medicine, Epidermal growth factor receptor, Chemotherapy, biology, business.industry, medicine.disease, Oxaliplatin, Irinotecan, 030104 developmental biology, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, biology.protein, business, Camptothecin, medicine.drug
Abstract: Our aim was to investigate the impact of EREG and AREG mRNA expression (by RT-qPCR) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In addition, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression (by immunohistochemistry) as well as RAS-and PIK3CA-mutations (by pyrosequencing) were assessed. Tumors of 208 mCRC patients receiving 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin plus irinotecan (FUFIRI) or irinotecan plus oxaliplatin (mIROX) within the FIRE-1 trial were analyzed for mutations. Molecular characteristics were correlated with response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS). mRNA expression was evaluated using ROC-analysis in 192 tumors (AREG high n = 31 vs. low n = 161; EREG high n = 89 vs. low n = 103). High versus low AREG expression was associated with PFS of 10.0 versus 8.0 months (HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.402-0.940, p = 0.03) and OS of 24.6 versus 18.7 months (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.476-1.078, p = 0.11). High versus low EREG expression correlated with prolonged PFS (9.4 vs. 6.8 months, HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.460-0.846, p = 0.002) and OS (25.8 vs. 15.5 months, HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.351-0.657, p < 0.001). The positive prognostic effect of high EREG expression was confirmed in a multivariate analysis and was neither affected by EGFR expression nor by mutations of RAS- and PIK3CA-genes. EREG expression appears as an independent prognostic marker in patients with mCRC receiving first-line irinotecan-based chemotherapy.
Published: 2015
Full Text: View/download PDF

27. Outcome of advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia following different first-line and relapse therapies: a meta-analysis of five prospective trials by the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG)

Author: Stephan Stilgenbauer, Barbara Eichhorst, Anna-Maria Fink, Paula Cramer, Martina Stauch, Kirsten Fischer, Susanne Isfort, Gabor Kovacs, Natali Pflug, Thomas Elter, Petra Langerbeins, Hartmut Döhner, Clemens-Martin Wendtner, Elisabeth Lange, Jasmin Bahlo, Michael Hallek, Manuela M. Bergmann, Valentin Goede, and Michael Kneba
Subjects: Male, Bendamustine, Oncology, Vincristine, medicine.medical_specialty, Prednisolone, Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Article, Disease-Free Survival, Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic, Chemoimmunotherapy, Internal medicine, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, medicine, Humans, Prospective Studies, Cyclophosphamide, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chlorambucil, business.industry, Hematology, medicine.disease, Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell, Surgery, Fludarabine, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Doxorubicin, Alemtuzumab, Female, Rituximab, business, medicine.drug
Abstract: To evaluate the effect of first-line and subsequent therapies, the outcome of 1,558 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia from five prospective phase II/III trials conducted between 1999 and 2010 was analyzed. The 3-year overall survival rate was higher after first-line treatment with chemoimmunotherapies such as fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (87.9%) or bendamustine/rituximab (90.7%) compared to chemotherapies without an antibody (fludarabine/cyclophosphamide: 84.6%; fludarabine: 77.5%; chlorambucil: 77.4%). Furthermore, the median overall survival was longer in patients receiving at least one antibody-containing regimen in any treatment line (94.4 months) compared to the survival in patients who never received an antibody (84.3 months, P24 months after first-line therapy repeated the first-line regimen. Among 315 patients requiring treatment ≤24 months after first-line therapy, cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone with or without rituximab as well as alemtuzumab were the most commonly used therapies. In these early relapsing patients, the median overall survival was shorter following therapies containing an anthracycline and/or three or more cytotoxic agents (e.g. cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone or fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/mitoxantrone, 30.0 months) compared to single agent chemotherapy (e.g. fludarabine; 39.6 months) and standard chemoimmunotherapy (e.g. fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab: 61.6 months). In conclusion, the analysis confirms the superior efficacy of chemoimmunotherapies in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Moreover, the use of aggressive chemo(immuno)therapy combinations in patients with an early relapse does not offer any benefit when compared to less intensive therapies. Trial identifier: NCT00281918, ISRCTN75653261, ISRCTN36294212, NCT00274989 and NCT00147901.
Published: 2015
Full Text: View/download PDF

28. Efficacy of Prophylactic Low–Molecular Weight Heparin for Ambulatory Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: Outcomes From the CONKO-004 Trial

Author: Hanno Riess, Timm Denecke, Martina Grunewald, Uwe Pelzer, Bernd Dörken, Lothar Müller, P. Reitzig, Helmut Oettle, Marianne Sinn, Jens Stieler, Martina Stauch, Gerd Deutschinoff, S. Hahnfeld, Sven Bischoff, and B. Opitz
Subjects: Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Chemotherapy, business.industry, medicine.drug_class, medicine.medical_treatment, Hazard ratio, Cancer, Low molecular weight heparin, medicine.disease, law.invention, Surgery, Oncology, Randomized controlled trial, law, Internal medicine, Pancreatic cancer, Ambulatory, medicine, business, Prospective cohort study
Abstract: Purpose Advanced pancreatic cancer (APC), in addition to its high mortality, accounts for the highest rates of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs). Enoxaparin, a low–molecular weight heparin, is effective in prevention and treatment of VTEs. Some small studies have indicated that this benefit might extend to patients with cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with histologically proven APC were randomly assigned to ambulant first-line chemotherapy and prophylactic use of enoxaparin or chemotherapy alone to investigate the probable reduction in symptomatic VTEs and the impact on survival. Results A total of 312 patients were recruited as one of the protocol end points was reached. Within the first 3 months, the numbers of symptomatic VTEs were as follows: 15 of 152 patients in the observation group and two of 160 patients in the enoxaparin group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.52; χ2 P = .001). The numbers of major bleeding events were as follows: five of 152 patients in the observation arm and seven of 160 patients in the enoxaparin arm (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.35 to 3.72; χ2 P = 1.0). Overall cumulative incidence rates of symptomatic VTEs were 15.1% (observation) and 6.4% (enoxaparin; HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.83; P = .01). Progression-free (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.32; P = .64) and overall survival (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.38; P = .44) did not differ between groups. Conclusion This study demonstrates the high efficacy and feasibility of primary pharmacologic prevention of symptomatic VTEs in outpatients with APC. Treatment efficacy was not affected by simultaneous treatment with enoxaparin in this trial setting.
Published: 2015
Full Text: View/download PDF

29. Prognostic value of KRAS mutations in stage III colon cancer: post hoc analysis of the PETACC8 phase III trial dataset

Author: Josef Thaler, Richard Greil, Johannes Gaenzer, Wolfgang Eisterer, Joerg Tschmelitsch, Hellmut Samonigg, August Zabernigg, Franz Schmid, Günther Steger, Robert Steinacher, Johannes Andel, Alois Lang, Reinhold Függer, Friedrich Hofbauer, Ewald Woell, Dietmar Geissler, Alfred Lenauer, Manfred Prager, Jean-Luc Van Laethem, Eric Van Cutsem, Geert D'Haens, Gauthier Demolin, Joseph Kerger, Guido Deboever, Gilbert Ghillebert, Marc Polus, Hassan RezaieKalantari, Thierry Delaunoit, Jean Charles Goeminne, Marc Peeters, Philippe Vergauwe, Ghislain Houbiers, Yves Humblet, Jos Janssens, Dirk Schrijvers, Erik Vanderstraeten, Jan Vermorken, Daniel Van Daele, Michel Ferrante, Frederic Forget, Alain Hendlisz, Mette Yilmaz, Svend Erik Nielsen, Lene Vestermark, Jim Larsen, Marc Ychou, Ayman Zawadi, Mohamed-Ayman Zawadi, Olivier Bouche, Laurent Mineur, Jaafar Bennouna-Louridi, Louis Marie Dourthe, Eveline Boucher, Julien Taieb, Denis Pezet, Francoise Desseigne, Michel Ducreux, Patrick Texereau, Laurent Miglianico, Philippe Rougier, Serge Fratte, Charles-Briac Levache, Yacine Merrouche, Stephen Ellis, Christophe Locher, Jean-Francois Ramee, Claire Garnier, Frederic Viret, Bruno Chauffert, Isabelle Cojean-Zelek, Pierre Michel, Cedric Lecaille, Christian Borel, Jean-Francois Seitz, Denis Smith, Catherine Lombard-Bohas, Thierry Andre, Jean-Marc Gornet, Francine Fein, Marie-Aude Coulon-Sfairi, Marie-Christine Kaminsky, Jean-Paul Lagasse, Dominique Luet, Pierre-Luc Etienne, Mohamed Gasmi, Andre Vanoli, Suzanne Nguyen, Thomas Aparicio, Hervé Perrier, Noel Stremsdoerfer, Philippe Laplaige, Dominique Arsene, Dominique Auby, Laurent Bedenne, Romain Coriat, Bernard Denis, Patrick Geoffroy, Gilles Piot, Yves Becouarn, Gilbert Bordes, Gael Deplanque, Olivier Dupuis, Frederic Fruge, Rosine Guimbaud, Thierry Lecomte, Gérard Lledo, Iradej Sobhani, Amani Asnacios, Ahmed Azzedine, Christophe Desauw, Marie-Pierre Galais, Dany Gargot, You-Heng Lam, Abakar Abakar-Mahamat, Jean-Francois Berdah, Sylviane Catteau, Marie-Christine Clavero-Fabri, Jean-Francois Codoul, Jean-Louis Legoux, Denis Goldfain, Pierre Guichard, Denis Pere Verge, Jocelyne Provencal, Bruno Vedrenne, Catherine Brezault-Bonnet, Denis Cleau, Jean-Paul Desir, David Fallik, Bruno Garcia, Marie-Hélène Gaspard, Dominique Genet, Johannes Hartwig, Yves Krummel, Tamara MatysiakBudnik, Vanessa Palascak-Juif, Harizo Randrianarivelo, Yves Rinaldi, Albert Aleba, Ariane Darut-Jouve, Aimery de Gramont, Herve Hamon, Frederic Wendehenne, Axel Matzdorff, Michael Konrad Stahl, Wolfgang Schepp, Martin Burk, Lothar Mueller, Gunnar Folprecht, Michael Geissler, Luisa Mantovani-Loeffler, Thomas Hoehler, Walter Asperger, Hendrik Kroening, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Stefan Fuxius, Matthias Groschek, Johannes Meiler, Tanja Trarbach, Jacqueline Rauh, Nicolas Ziegenhagen, Albrecht Kretzschmar, Ullrich Graeven, Arnd Nusch, Goetz von Wichert, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Gerhard Kleber, Karl-Heinz Schmidt, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Claudia Baum, Jochen Schuette, Georg Martin Haag, Wilhelm Holtkamp, Jochen Potenberg, Tobias Reiber, Georg Schliesser, Hans-Joachim Schmoll, Wolfgang Schneider-Kappus, Wolfgang Abenhardt, Claudio Denzlinger, Jan Henning, Bartscht Marxsen, Hans GuenterDerigs, Helmut Lambertz, Ingulf Becker-Boost, Karel Caca, Christian Constantin, Thomas Decker, Henning Eschenburg, Sigrun Gabius, Holger Hebart, Albrecht Hoffmeister, Heinz-August Horst, Stephan Kremers, Malte Leithaeuser, Sebastian Mueller, Siegfried Wagner, Severin Daum, Frank Schlegel, Martina Stauch, Volker Heinemann, Roberto Labianca, Giuseppe Colucci, Dino Amadori, Enrico Mini, Alfredo Falcone, Corrado Boni, Evaristo Maiello, Luciano Latini, Alberto Zaniboni, Giuseppe Aprile, Sandro Barni, Rodolfo Mattioli, Andrea Martoni, Rodolfo Passalacqua, Mario Nicolini, Enzo Pasquini, Carla Rabbi, Enrico Aitini, Alberto Ravaioli, Carlo Barone, Guido Biasco, Stefano Tamberi, Angelo Gambi, Claudio Verusio, Marina Marzola, Giorgio Lelli, Stefano Cascinu, Paolo Bidoli, Massimo Vaghi, Giorgio Cruciani, Francesco Di Costanzo, Alberto Sobrero, Roberto Petrioli, Massimo Aglietta, Oscar Alabiso, Federico Capuzzo, Domenico Cristi Corsi, Stefania Salvagni, Silvana Chiara, Francesco Ferraù, Francesco Giuliani, Sara Lonardi, Nicola Gebbia, Giovanni Mantovani, Evaristo Sanches, Juan Carlos Mellidez, Pedro Santos, Joao Freire, Cristina Sarmento, Luis Costa, Antonio Moreira Pinto, Sergio Barroso, Jorge Espirito Santo, Fátima Guedes, Amélia Monteiro, Anabela Sa, Irene Furtado, Josep Tabernero, Ramon Salazar, Enrique Aranda Aguilar, Fernando Rivera Herrero, Javier Sastre Valera, Manuel ValladaresAyerbes, Jaime FeliuBatlle, Silvia Gil, Carlos Garcia-Giron, Guillermo Lopez Vivanco, Antonia Salud Salvia, Vicente Alonso Orduña, Ruth Vera Garcia, Javier Gallego, Bartomeu Massuti Sureda, Jordi Remon, Maria Jose Safont Aguilera, Luis CireraNogueras, BernadoQueralt Merino, Cristina Gravalos Castro, Purificacion Martinez de Prado, Carlos PijaumePericay, Manuel ConstenlaFigueiras, InmaculadaGuasch Jordan, Maria Jose GomeReina, Amelia Lopez-Ladron Garcia, Antonio Arrivi Garcia-Ramos, Andres Cervantes, Carlos Fernandez Martos, Eugenio MarcuelloGaspar, Ines Cabezas Montero, Pilar Escudero Emperador, Ana Leon Carbonero, Manuel Gallen Castillo, Teresa Garcia Garcia, Jose Garcia Lopez, Encarnacion Gonzalez Flores, Monica GuillotMorales, Marta LlanosMuñoz, Ana López Martín, Joan Maurel, Juan Carlos Camara, Rosario Dueñas Garcia, Mercedes Salgado, Isabel HernandezBusquier, Teresa Checa Ruiz, Adelaida LacastaMuñoa, MiquelNogue Aliguer, Amalia Velasco Ortiz de Taranco, Miguel Mendez Ureña, Ferran Losa Gaspa, Jose Juan Ponce, Carlos Bosch Roig, Pedro Valero Jimenez, Antonio GalanBrotons, Santiago AlbiolRodriguez, Jose Ales Martinez, Liliana Canosa Ruiz, Margarita CentellesRuiz, John Bridgewater, Rob Glynne-Jones, Saad Tahir, Tamas Hickish, Jim Cassidy, and Leslie Samuel
Subjects: Oncology, Hematology
Published: 2015
Full Text: View/download PDF

30. Prospective validation of a lymphocyte infiltration prognostic test in stage III colon cancer patients treated with adjuvant FOLFOX

Author: Jean-François Emile, Catherine Julié, Karine Le Malicot, Come Lepage, Josep Tabernero, Enrico Mini, Gunnar Folprecht, Jean-Luc Van Laethem, Stéphanie Dimet, Camille Boulagnon-Rombi, Marc-Antoine Allard, Frédérique Penault-Llorca, Jaafar Bennouna, Pierre Laurent-Puig, Julien Taieb, Josef Thaler, Richard Greil, Johannes Gaenzer, Wolfgang Eisterer, Joerg Tschmelitsch, Felix Keil, Hellmut Samonigg, August Zabernigg, Franz Schmid, Günther Steger, Robert Steinacher, Johannes Andel, Björn Jagdt, Alois Lang, Michael Fridrik, Reinhold Függer, Friedrich Hofbauer, Ewald Woell, Dietmar Geissler, Alfred Lenauer, Manfred Prager, Geert D'Haens, Gauthier Demolin, Joseph Kerger, Guido Deboever, Gilbert Ghillebert, Marc Polus, Eric Van Cutsem, Hassan Rezaie Kalantari, Thierry Delaunoit, Jean Charles Goeminne, Marc Peeters, Philippe Vergauwe, Ghislain Houbiers, Yves Humblet, Jos Janssens, Dirk Schrijvers, Erik Vanderstraeten, Jan Vermorken, Daniel Van Daele, Michel Ferrante, Frederic Forget, Alain Hendlisz, Mette Yilmaz, Svend Erik Nielsen, Lene Vestermark, Jim Larsen, Mohamed-Ayman Zawadi, Olivier Bouche, Laurent Mineur, Jaafar Bennouna-Louridi, Louis Marie Dourthe, Marc Ychou, Eveline Boucher, Denis Pezet, Francoise Desseigne, Michel Ducreux, Patrick Texereau, Laurent Miglianico, Philippe Rougier, Serge Fratte, Charles-Briac Levache, Yacine Merrouche, Stephen Ellis, Christophe Locher, Jean-Francois Ramee, Claire Garnier, Frederic Viret, Bruno Chauffert, Isabelle Cojean-Zelek, Pierre Michel, Cedric Lecaille, Christian Borel, Jean-Francois Seitz, Denis Smith, Catherine Lombard-Bohas, Thierry Andre, Jean-Marc Gornet, Francine Fein, Marie-Aude Coulon-Sfairi, Marie-Christine Kaminsky, Jean-Paul Lagasse, Dominique Luet, Pierre-Luc Etienne, Mohamed Gasmi, Andre Vanoli, Suzanne Nguyen, Thomas Aparicio, Hervé Perrier, Noel Stremsdoerfer, Philippe Laplaige, Dominique Arsene, Dominique Auby, Laurent Bedenne, Romain Coriat, Bernard Denis, Patrick Geoffroy, Gilles Piot, Yves Becouarn, Gilbert Bordes, Gael Deplanque, Olivier Dupuis, Frederic Fruge, Rosine Guimbaud, Thierry Lecomte, Gérard Lledo, Iradej Sobhani, Amani Asnacios, Ahmed Azzedine, Christophe Desauw, Marie-Pierre Galais, Dany Gargot, You-Heng Lam, Abakar Abakar-Mahamat, Jean-Francois Berdah, Sylviane Catteau, Marie-Christine Clavero-Fabri, Jean-Francois Codoul, Jean-Louis Legoux, Denis Goldfain, Pierre Guichard, Denis Pere Verge, Jocelyne Provencal, Bruno Vedrenne, Catherine Brezault-Bonnet, Denis Cleau, Jean-Paul Desir, David Fallik, Bruno Garcia, Marie-Hélène Gaspard, Dominique Genet, Johannes Hartwig, Yves Krummel, Tamara Matysiak Budnik, Vanessa Palascak-Juif, Harizo Randrianarivelo, Yves Rinaldi, Albert Aleba, Ariane Darut-Jouve, Aimery de Gramont, Herve Hamon, Frederic Wendehenne, Axel Matzdorff, Michael Konrad Stahl, Wolfgang Schepp, Martin Burk, Lothar Mueller, Michael Geissler, Luisa Mantovani-Loeffler, Thomas Hoehler, Walter Asperger, Hendrik Kroening, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Stefan Fuxius, Matthias Groschek, Johannes Meiler, Tanja Trarbach, Jacqueline Rauh, Nicolas Ziegenhagen, Albrecht Kretzschmar, Ullrich Graeven, Arnd Nusch, Goetz von Wichert, Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz, Gerhard Kleber, Karl-Heinz Schmidt, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Claudia Baum, Jochen Schuette, Georg Martin Haag, Wilhelm Holtkamp, Jochen Potenberg, Tobias Reiber, Georg Schliesser, Hans-Joachim Schmoll, Wolfgang Schneider-Kappus, Wolfgang Abenhardt, Claudio Denzlinger, Jan Henning, Bartscht Marxsen, Hans Guenter Derigs, Helmut Lambertz, Ingulf Becker-Boost, Karel Caca, Christian Constantin, Thomas Decker, Henning Eschenburg, Sigrun Gabius, Holger Hebart, Albrecht Hoffmeister, Heinz-August Horst, Stephan Kremers, Malte Leithaeuser, Sebastian Mueller, Siegfried Wagner, Severin Daum, Frank Schlegel, Martina Stauch, Volker Heinemann, Evaristo Maiello, Luciano Latini, Alberto Zaniboni, Dino Amadori, Giuseppe Aprile, Sandro Barni, Rodolfo Mattioli, Andrea Martoni, Rodolfo Passalacqua, Mario Nicolini, Enzo Pasquini, Carla Rabbi, Enrico Aitini, Alberto Ravaioli, Carlo Barone, Guido Biasco, Stefano Tamberi, Angelo Gambi, Claudio Verusio, Marina Marzola, Giorgio Lelli, Corrado Boni, Stefano Cascinu, Paolo Bidoli, Massimo Vaghi, Giorgio Cruciani, Francesco Di Costanzo, Alberto Sobrero, Roberto Petrioli, Massimo Aglietta, Oscar Alabiso, Federico Capuzzo, Alfredo Falcone, Domenico Cristi Corsi, Roberto Labianca, Stefania Salvagni, Silvana Chiara, Libero Ciuffreda, Francesco Ferraù, Francesco Giuliani, Sara Lonardi, Nicola Gebbia, Giovanni Mantovani, Evaristo Sanches, Juan Carlos Mellidez, Pedro Santos, Joao Freire, Cristina Sarmento, Luis Costa, Antonio Moreira Pinto, Sergio Barroso, Jorge Espirito Santo, Fátima Guedes, Amélia Monteiro, Anabela Sa, Irene Furtado, Ramon Salazar, Enrique Aranda Aguilar, Fernando Rivera Herrero, Javier Sastre Valera, Manuel Valladares Ayerbes, Jaime Feliu Batlle, Silvia Gil, Albert Abad Esteve, Carlos Garcia-Giron, Guillermo Lopez Vivanco, Antonia Salud Salvia, Vicente Alonso Orduña, Ruth Vera Garcia, Javier Gallego, Bartomeu Massuti Sureda, Jordi Remon, Maria Jose Safont Aguilera, Luis Cirera Nogueras, Bernado Queralt Merino, Cristina Gravalos Castro, Purificacion Martinez de Prado, Carlos Pijaume Pericay, Manuel Constenla Figueiras, Inmaculada Guasch Jordan, Maria Jose Gome Reina, Amelia Lopez-Ladron Garcia, Antonio Arrivi Garcia-Ramos, Andres Cervantes, Carlos Fernandez Martos, Eugenio Marcuello Gaspar, Ines Cabezas Montero, Pilar Escudero Emperador, Ana Leon Carbonero, Manuel Gallen Castillo, Teresa Garcia Garcia, Jose Garcia Lopez, Encarnacion Gonzalez Flores, Monica Guillot Morales, Marta Llanos Muñoz, Ana López Martín, Joan Maurel, Juan Carlos Camara, Rosario Dueñas Garcia, Mercedes Salgado, Isabel Hernandez Busquier, Teresa Checa Ruiz, Adelaida Lacasta Muñoa, Miquel Nogue Aliguer, Amalia Velasco Ortiz de Taranco, Miguel Mendez Ureña, Ferran Losa Gaspa, Jose Juan Ponce, Carlos Bosch Roig, Pedro Valero Jimenez, Antonio Galan Brotons, Santiago Albiol Rodriguez, Jose Ales Martinez, Liliana Canosa Ruiz, Margarita Centelles Ruiz, John Bridgewater, Rob Glynne-Jones, Saad Tahir, Tamas Hickish, Jim Cassidy, Leslie Samuel, UE 1373 Fourrages Environnement Ruminants Lusignan, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique ( INRA ) -Physiologie Animale et Systèmes d'Elevage ( PHASE ) -Environnement et Agronomie ( E.A. ) -Biologie et Amélioration des Plantes ( BAP ) -Fourrages Environnement Ruminants Lusignan ( FERLUS ), Service de pathologie [CHU Ambroise Paré], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)-Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Service de Biostatistique, Fédération Francophone de la Cancérologie Digestive, FFCD, Lipides - Nutrition - Cancer [Dijon - U1231] ( LNC ), Université de Bourgogne ( UB ) -AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ), Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie et cancérologie digestive (CHU de Dijon), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon - Hôpital François Mitterrand ( CHU Dijon ), Vall d'Hebron University Hospital [Barcelona], Dpt of Internal Medicine, Section of Immunoallergology and Respiratory [Florence] Diseases, University of Florence, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Erasme Hospital, Brussels, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, AP-HP Hôpital Paul Brousse, Modèles de Cellules Souches Malignes et Thérapeutiques, Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 ( UP11 ) -Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ) -Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 ( UP11 ) -Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ), Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques - Clermont Auvergne ( IMoST ), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ) -Université Clermont Auvergne ( UCA ), Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest - Nantes ( ICO Nantes ), CRLCC Paul Papin-CRLCC René Gauducheau, Centre de recherche de Cancérologie et d'Immunologie / Nantes - Angers ( CRCINA ), Université d'Angers ( UA ) -Université de Nantes ( UN ) -Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ) -Institut de Recherche en Santé de l'Université de Nantes ( IRS-UN ) -Centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes ( CHU Nantes ), Université de Nantes ( UN ), Médecine Personnalisée, Pharmacogénomique, Optimisation Thérapeutique ( MEPPOT - U1147 ), Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 ( UPD5 ) -Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ), Klinikum Wels Grieskirchen, Oncology department [Salzburg], Salzburger Landesklinikum - Uniklinikum Salzburg ( SALK ), Institute of Chemical Reaction Engineering, Hamburg University of Technology, Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung ( AWI ), Department of Medical Oncology, Medical University Vienna, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital of Steyr, Department Internal Medicine 3, Centre for Hematology and Medical Oncology, General Hospital Linz, Department Medicine LKH, Institut für Festköperfirschung, Institut des Sciences Moléculaires de Marseille ( ISM2 ), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ) -Ecole Centrale de Marseille ( ECM ) -Aix Marseille Université ( AMU ), University Hospitals Leuven [Leuven], Katholieke Universiteit Leuven ( KU Leuven ), Pharmacology and Toxicology, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Institut de Biologie Computationnelle ( IBC ), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement ( CIRAD ) -Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique ( INRA ) -Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique ( Inria ) -Université de Montpellier ( UM ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Institut des Sciences Moléculaires ( ISM ), Université Montesquieu - Bordeaux 4-Université Sciences et Technologies - Bordeaux 1-École Nationale Supérieure de Chimie et de Physique de Bordeaux (ENSCPB)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University [Belgium] ( UGENT ), Medical Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital [Edegem], Recombinaison et Expression Génétique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ), Centre Hospitalier de L'Ardenne (Libramont), Department of Cardiology [Sivas, Turkey], Cumhuriyet University [Sivas, Turkey], Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet [Copenhagen], Odense Hospital, CP Kelco ApS, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims ( CHU Reims ), Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier ( IRCM - U1194 Inserm - UM ), CRLCC Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ) -Université de Montpellier ( UM ), Université du Québec à Montréal ( UQAM ), Université Panthéon-Sorbonne ( UP1 ), École nationale supérieure d'architecture de Nantes ( ENSA Nantes ), Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Oncology, Hopital Ambroise Pare, 9, Avenue Charles de Gaulle, 92104, Boulogne Cedex, France., Hôpital Ambroise Paré, CH Belfort-Montbéliard, Polyclinique Francheville, Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire Lucien Neuwirth, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne ( CHU de Saint-Etienne ), Centre Hospitalier de Meaux, Service d'hématologie, Clinique Catherine de Sienne, Unité de recherche sur les Biopolymères, Interactions Assemblages ( BIA ), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique ( INRA ), Université de la Méditerranée - Aix-Marseille 2, Centre hospitalier universitaire d'Amiens ( CHU Amiens-Picardie ), CHU Amiens-Picardie, Pôle oncologie médicale, Hôpital des Diaconesses, Génétique du cancer et des maladies neuropsychiatriques ( GMFC ), Université de Rouen Normandie ( UNIROUEN ), Normandie Université ( NU ) -Normandie Université ( NU ) -Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ), Université de Bretagne Occidentale - École de sages-femmes ( UBO UFR MSS ESF ), Université de Brest ( UBO ) -Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest ( CHRU Brest ), Service d'oncologie digestive et hépato-gastro-entérologie [Hôpital de la Timone - APHM], Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille ( APHM ) - Hôpital de la Timone [CHU - APHM] ( TIMONE ), Service d'Oncologie Médicale [Centre hospitalier Lyon Sud - HCL], Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud [CHU - HCL] ( CHLS ), Hospices Civils de Lyon ( HCL ) -Hospices Civils de Lyon ( HCL ), Service d'Oncologie Médicale [CHU Saint -Antoine], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)-CHU Saint-Antoine [APHP], Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine ( CR Saint-Antoine ), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ) -Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 ( UPMC ), Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 ( UPD7 ), Service Gastro-Entérologie, CHU Besançon, Université de Franche-Comté ( UFC ) -Université de Franche-Comté ( UFC ), Centre Alexis Vautrin ( CAV ), Ecophysiologie Végétale, Agronomie et Nutritions ( EVA ), Université de Caen Normandie ( UNICAEN ), Normandie Université ( NU ) -Normandie Université ( NU ) -Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique ( INRA ), Image et ville ( IV ), Université Louis Pasteur - Strasbourg I-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Département informatique ( INFO ), Université européenne de Bretagne ( UEB ) -Télécom Bretagne-Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris], Service de Gastro-entérologie [Avicenne], Université Paris 13 ( UP13 ) -Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)-Hôpital Avicenne, Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l'Energie - ADEME, Service d'hépato-gastroentérologie, CHU Caen-Hôpital côte de nacre, Département de Médecine, Centre hospitalier de Libourne, Service d'Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie (CHU de Dijon), Institut Cochin ( UM3 (UMR 8104 / U1016) ), Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 ( UPD5 ) -Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Fondation FondaMental, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP)-Hôpital Henri Mondor, Variabilité de réponse aux psychotropes ( VariaPsy - U1144 ), Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 ( UPD5 ) -Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ) -Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 ( UPD7 ), Département d'oncologie digestive, Institut Bergonié - CRLCC Bordeaux, Hôpital St Joseph, Service de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique ( CHU Lyon ), Hospices Civils de Lyon ( HCL ), Gastro - Entérologie et Nutrition, CHU Toulouse [Toulouse]-Hôpital de Rangueil, CHU Toulouse [Toulouse], Génétique, Immunothérapie, Chimie et Cancer ( GICC ), Université de Tours-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Université Montpellier 1 ( UM1 ), Service de gastro-entérologie - Hôpital Henri Mondor, Laboratoire Matière et Systèmes Complexes ( Laboratoire MSC ), Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 ( UPD7 ) -UFR de Physique, France, Amériques, Espagne – Sociétés, pouvoirs, acteurs ( FRAMESPA ), Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès ( UT2J ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Regional Hospital of Orleans, Histoire, Archéologie et littératures des Mondes chrétiens et musulmans médiévaux ( CIHAM ), École normale supérieure - Lyon ( ENS Lyon ) -Université Lumière - Lyon 2 ( UL2 ) -École des hautes études en sciences sociales ( EHESS ) -Université Jean Moulin - Lyon III ( UJML ) -Université d'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse ( UAPV ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Neurobiologie des signaux intercellulaires ( NSI ), Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 ( UPMC ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Dept Med Genet, Hôpital Erasme (Bruxelles), Polyclinique de Limoges - site François Chénieux [Limoges], Clinique Médicale B, CHU Strasbourg, Service de gastro-entérologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Besançon] ( CHRU Besançon ) -Hôpital Jean Minjoz, Hôpital Européen [Fondation Ambroise Paré - Marseille], Asklepios Klinikum Uckermark GmbH, DESY, Notkestr 85, D-22607 Hamburg, Germany, NASA Ames Research Center ( ARC ), Department of Chemistry, Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University [Nashville], Biostatistique et Processus Spatiaux ( BIOSP ), Institute of Ecology [Jena], Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, University of Rostock [Germany], Universität Stuttgart [Stuttgart], Oneonta, Zentrum für Innere Medizin, Klinikum Schwäbisch Gmünd/Stauferklinik, Physiopathologie du stress pancréatique, Institut Armand Frappier ( INRS-IAF ), Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique [Québec] ( INRS ) -Réseau International des Instituts Pasteur ( RIIP ) -Institut Armand Frappier, Institut de Mathématiques de Marseille ( I2M ), Aix Marseille Université ( AMU ) -Ecole Centrale de Marseille ( ECM ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation [Dijon] ( CSGA ), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique ( INRA ) -Université de Bourgogne ( UB ) -AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Department of Computer Science [Freiburg], University of Freiburg [Freiburg], Institut für Mathematik [Berlin], Technische Universität Berlin ( TUB ), Department of Information Engineering, Computer Science and Mathematics, Università degli Studi dell'Aquila [L'Aquila] ( UNIVAQ.IT ), Department of Animal Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, FEEM, Romagna Cancer Registry, IRST, Luigi Pierantoni Hospital, Observatoire sociologique du changement ( OSC ), Sciences Po-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Dipartimento di Chimica, Fisica e Ambiente, Università degli Studi di Udine - University of Udine [Italie], Department of Nuclear Medicine, PET/CT Centre, Centre de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences ( CPN - U894 ), Clinica di Oncologia Medica, AO Ospedali Riuniti, Università Politecnica delle Marche [Ancona] ( UNIVPM ), Universidade Nova de Lisboa ( UNINOVA ), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute [Ottawa] ( OHRI ), Oncologia Medica, Ospedali Riuniti, Ospedale 'San Vincenzo', NIPE, CIPES, European Synchrotron Radiation Facility ( ESRF ), Departamento de Engenharia Informática, Faculdade de Engenharia [Porto] ( FEUP ), Universidade do Porto [Porto]-Universidade do Porto [Porto], 3Decide, Unité de recherche Amélioration, Génétique et Physiologie Forestières ( UAGPF ), Universidade Federal de Campina Grande [Campina Grande] ( UFCG ), Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores ( INESC ), Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Regional do Cariri ( URCA Brasil ), Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology [Barcelona, Spain], Universitat de Barcelona ( UB ), Associated Unit to Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas - CSIC [Barcelona, Spain], University of Barcelona-Institute of Biomedicine - IBUB [Barcelona, Spain], IRCELYON-Caractérisation et remédiation des polluants dans l'air et l'eau ( CARE ), Institut de recherches sur la catalyse et l'environnement de Lyon ( IRCELYON ), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 ( UCBL ), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ) -Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 ( UCBL ), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Laboratoire d'analyse et d'architecture des systèmes [Toulouse] ( LAAS ), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ) -Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier ( UPS ), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - Toulouse ( INSA Toulouse ), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées ( INSA ) -Institut National des Sciences Appliquées ( INSA ) -Institut National Polytechnique [Toulouse] ( INP ), Institut Charles Gerhardt Montpellier - Institut de Chimie Moléculaire et des Matériaux de Montpellier ( ICGM ICMMM ), Université Montpellier 1 ( UM1 ) -Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques ( UM2 ) -Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Montpellier ( ENSCM ) -Université de Montpellier ( UM ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid [Madrid] ( ICMM ), Interactions, Corpus, Apprentissages, Représentations ( ICAR ), École normale supérieure - Lyon ( ENS Lyon ) -Université Lumière - Lyon 2 ( UL2 ) -INRP-Ecole Normale Supérieure Lettres et Sciences Humaines-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer ( IDIBAPS ), North Region Cancer Registry of Portugal, UMR 5805 Environnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux ( EPOC ), Observatoire aquitain des sciences de l'univers ( OASU ), Université Sciences et Technologies - Bordeaux 1-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers ( INSU - CNRS ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ) -Université Sciences et Technologies - Bordeaux 1-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers ( INSU - CNRS ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ) -École pratique des hautes études ( EPHE ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Department of Paediatrics and Intensive Care, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Deu, Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale ( LPS ), Aix Marseille Université ( AMU ), Universitat de València ( UV ), Instituto de Cienca de Materiales de Madrid [Madrid] ( ICMM ), Biology, New Mexico State University, New Mexico State University, Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines ( UVSQ ), Centre de recherche sur les Ions, les MAtériaux et la Photonique ( CIMAP - UMR 6252 ), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ) -Ecole Nationale Supérieure d'Ingénieurs de Caen ( ENSICAEN ), Normandie Université ( NU ) -Normandie Université ( NU ) -Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives ( CEA ) -Université de Caen Normandie ( UNICAEN ), Normandie Université ( NU ), Institut d'Electronique et de Télécommunications de Rennes ( IETR ), Université de Nantes ( UN ) -Université de Rennes 1 ( UR1 ), Université de Rennes ( UNIV-RENNES ) -Université de Rennes ( UNIV-RENNES ) -Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - Rennes ( INSA Rennes ) -CentraleSupélec-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Computer Science Department - Carnegie Mellon University, University of Pittsburgh, Laboratoire de Sciences Actuarielle et Financière ( SAF ), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon, Instituto de Oncologia Corachan ( IDOC ), Laboratoire d'informatique de l'école normale supérieure ( LIENS ), École normale supérieure - Paris ( ENS Paris ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Experimental Quantum Optics and Photonics Group, University of Strathclyde, Institut de recherches Asiatiques ( IrAsia ), Aix Marseille Université ( AMU ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Centre Européen de Réalité Virtuelle ( CERV ), École Nationale d'Ingénieurs de Brest ( ENIB ), Sol Agro et hydrosystème Spatialisation ( SAS ), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique ( INRA ) -AGROCAMPUS OUEST, Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences ( GIN ), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ) -CHU Grenoble-Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 ( UJF ), Centre de recherche cerveau et cognition ( CERCO ), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, Laboratoire Géomatériaux et Environnement ( LGE ), Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée ( UPEM ), Hôpital Ambroise Paré [AP-HP], Université Paris-Saclay, Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpital Ambroise Paré [AP-HP], Lipides - Nutrition - Cancer [Dijon - U1231] (LNC), Université de Bourgogne (UB)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon - Hôpital François Mitterrand (CHU Dijon), Università degli Studi di Firenze = University of Florence [Firenze] (UNIFI), Hôpital Erasme [Bruxelles] (ULB), Faculté de Médecine [Bruxelles] (ULB), Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB)-Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Centre hépato-biliaire (CHB), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpital Paul Brousse-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques (IMoST), Université Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020] (UCA [2017-2020])-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest [Angers/Nantes] (UNICANCER/ICO), UNICANCER, Université de Nantes (UN), Médecine Personnalisée, Pharmacogénomique, Optimisation Thérapeutique (MEPPOT - U1147), Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Salzburger Landesklinikum - Uniklinikum Salzburg (SALK), Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (AWI), Institut des Sciences Moléculaires de Marseille (ISM2), Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-École Centrale de Marseille (ECM)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC), Catholic University of Leuven - Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KU Leuven), Institut de Biologie Computationnelle (IBC), Université de Montpellier (UM)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut des Sciences Moléculaires (ISM), Université Montesquieu - Bordeaux 4-Université Sciences et Technologies - Bordeaux 1-École Nationale Supérieure de Chimie et de Physique de Bordeaux (ENSCPB)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universiteit Gent = Ghent University [Belgium] (UGENT), Antwerp University Hospital [Edegem] (UZA), Hillerød Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital-Copenhagen University Hospital, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims (CHU Reims), Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM - U1194 Inserm - UM), CRLCC Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Montpellier (UM), Université du Québec à Montréal = University of Québec in Montréal (UQAM), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (UP1), École nationale supérieure d'architecture de Nantes (ENSA Nantes), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne (CHU de Saint-Etienne), Unité de recherche sur les Biopolymères, Interactions Assemblages (BIA), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Génétique du cancer et des maladies neuropsychiatriques (GMFC), Université de Rouen Normandie (UNIROUEN), Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Université de Bretagne Occidentale - École de sages-femmes (UBO UFR MSS ESF), Université de Brest (UBO)-Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest (CHRU Brest), Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille (APHM)- Hôpital de la Timone [CHU - APHM] (TIMONE), Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud [CHU - HCL] (CHLS), Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL)-Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-CHU Saint-Antoine [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Sorbonne Université (SU), Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (UMRS893), Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon (CHRU Besançon), Centre Alexis Vautrin (CAV), Ecophysiologie Végétale, Agronomie et Nutritions (EVA), Université de Caen Normandie (UNICAEN), Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Image et ville (IV), Université Louis Pasteur - Strasbourg I-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Département informatique (INFO), Université européenne de Bretagne - European University of Brittany (UEB)-Télécom Bretagne-Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Université Paris 13 (UP13)-Hôpital Avicenne [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l'Energie (ADEME), Service d'Hépato-Gastro-Enterologie et Nutrition [CHU Caen], Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU)-CHU Caen, Normandie Université (NU)-Tumorothèque de Caen Basse-Normandie (TCBN)-Tumorothèque de Caen Basse-Normandie (TCBN), Centre Hospitalier Libourne, Institut Cochin (IC UM3 (UMR 8104 / U1016)), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Fondation FondaMental [Créteil], Variabilité de réponse aux Psychotropes (VariaPsy - U1144), Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Institut Bergonié [Bordeaux], UNICANCER-UNICANCER, Service de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique (CHU Lyon), Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Génétique, immunothérapie, chimie et cancer (GICC), UMR 7292 CNRS [2012-2017] (GICC UMR 7292 CNRS), Université de Tours-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Montpellier 1 (UM1), Service de gastro-entérologie [Henri Mondor AP-HP, Créteil], Hôpital Henri Mondor-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Matière et Systèmes Complexes (MSC (UMR_7057)), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7), Hôpital privé Toulon Hyères : Sainte Marguerite, Clinique des Quatre Pavillons, Lormont, France, Neurobiologie des signaux intercellulaires (NSI), Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB)-Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB)-Faculté de Médecine [Bruxelles] (ULB), NASA Ames Research Center (ARC), Biostatistique et Processus Spatiaux (BioSP), Friedrich-Schiller-Universität = Friedrich Schiller University Jena [Jena, Germany], University of Rostock, State University of New York at Oneonta (SUNY Oneonta), State University of New York (SUNY), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Institut Armand Frappier (INRS-IAF), Réseau International des Instituts Pasteur (RIIP)-Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique [Québec] (INRS), Institut de Mathématiques de Marseille (I2M), Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-École Centrale de Marseille (ECM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Klinikum Deggendorf, Technische Universität Berlin (TU), Università degli Studi dell'Aquila (UNIVAQ), North Carolina A&T State University, University of North Carolina System (UNC)-University of North Carolina System (UNC), Observatoire sociologique du changement (OSC), Sciences Po (Sciences Po)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut de psychiatrie et neurosciences (U894 / UMS 1266), Università Politecnica delle Marche [Ancona] (UNIVPM), Universidade Nova de Lisboa = NOVA University Lisbon (NOVA), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute [Ottawa] (OHRI), European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), Departamento de Engenharia Informática [Porto], Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto (FEUP), Universidade do Porto-Universidade do Porto, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande [Campina Grande] (UFCG), Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores (INESC), Universidade Regional do Cariri (URCA Brasil), Universitat de Barcelona (UB), IRCELYON-Catalytic and Atmospheric Reactivity for the Environment (CARE), Institut de recherches sur la catalyse et l'environnement de Lyon (IRCELYON), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC), Laboratoire d'analyse et d'architecture des systèmes (LAAS), Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J)-Université Toulouse 1 Capitole (UT1), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - Toulouse (INSA Toulouse), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, Institut Charles Gerhardt Montpellier - Institut de Chimie Moléculaire et des Matériaux de Montpellier (ICGM ICMMM), Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Montpellier (ENSCM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques (UM2)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC), Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (ICMM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Madrid] (CSIC), Interactions, Corpus, Apprentissages, Représentations (ICAR), École normale supérieure - Lyon (ENS Lyon)-Université Lumière - Lyon 2 (UL2)-INRP-Ecole Normale Supérieure Lettres et Sciences Humaines (ENS LSH)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), UMR 5805 Environnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux (EPOC), Observatoire aquitain des sciences de l'univers (OASU), Université Sciences et Technologies - Bordeaux 1-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Sciences et Technologies - Bordeaux 1-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-École pratique des hautes études (EPHE), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Hospital Universitario de Valme, Anenida de Bellavista s/n, Sevilla 41014, Spain, Hospital Son Llatzer, Universitat de València (UV), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ), Hospital Universitari Son Espases, University of Pittsburgh (PITT), Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education (PCSHE)-Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education (PCSHE), Instituto de Oncologia Corachan (IDOC), Laboratoire d'informatique de l'école normale supérieure (LIENS), École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Institut de recherches Asiatiques (IrAsia), Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre Européen de Réalité Virtuelle (CERV), École Nationale d'Ingénieurs de Brest (ENIB), Sol Agro et hydrosystème Spatialisation (SAS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AGROCAMPUS OUEST, Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro), Grenoble Institut des Neurosciences (GIN), Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre de recherche cerveau et cognition (CERCO), Institut des sciences du cerveau de Toulouse. (ISCT), Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-CHU Toulouse [Toulouse]-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-CHU Toulouse [Toulouse]-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Laboratoire Géomatériaux et Environnement (LGE), Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée (UPEM), Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD), Université de Bourgogne (UB)-AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-École Centrale de Marseille (ECM)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Service d'Oncologie Médicale [CHU Saint-Antoine], CHU Saint-Antoine [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université de Caen Normandie (UNICAEN), Normandie Université (NU)-Normandie Université (NU), Université Paris 13 (UP13)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpital Avicenne [AP-HP], Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5), Université de Tours (UT)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpital Henri Mondor, Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique [Québec] (INRS)-Réseau International des Instituts Pasteur (RIIP), Department of Information Engineering, Computer Science and Mathematics = Dipartimento di Ingegneria e Scienze dell'Informazione e Matematica [L'Aquila] (DISIM), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut Charles Gerhardt Montpellier - Institut de Chimie Moléculaire et des Matériaux de Montpellier (ICGM), Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Montpellier (ENSCM)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Département d'informatique - ENS Paris (DI-ENS), École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS-PSL), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-École Centrale de Marseille (ECM)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU), Institute of Biomedicine - IBUB [Barcelona, Spain]-University of Barcelona, Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques (UM2)-Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Montpellier (ENSCM)-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL), AGROCAMPUS OUEST, Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement (Institut Agro)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020] (UCA [2017-2020]), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-École Nationale Supérieure de Chimie et de Physique de Bordeaux (ENSCPB)-Université Sciences et Technologies - Bordeaux 1-Université Montesquieu - Bordeaux 4-Institut de Chimie du CNRS (INC), AGROCAMPUS OUEST-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Physiologie Animale et Systèmes d'Elevage (PHASE), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Environnement et Agronomie (E.A.)-Biologie et Amélioration des Plantes (BAP)-Fourrages Environnement Ruminants Lusignan (FERLUS), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (APHP)-Hôpital Ambroise Paré, University of Florence (UNIFI), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (APHP)-Hôpital Paul Brousse-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Imagerie Moléculaire et Stratégies Théranostiques - Clermont Auvergne (IMoST), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA), Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest - Nantes (ICO Nantes), Université Montesquieu - Bordeaux 4-Université Sciences et Technologies - Bordeaux 1-École Nationale Supérieure de Chimie et de Physique de Bordeaux (ENSCPB)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Ghent University [Belgium] (UGENT), CRLCC Val d'Aurelle - Paul Lamarque-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (UP1), Centre hospitalier universitaire d'Amiens (CHU Amiens-Picardie), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (APHP)-CHU Saint-Antoine [APHP], Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CR Saint-Antoine), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC), Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (APHP), Université de Franche-Comté (UFC)-Université de Franche-Comté (UFC), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (APHP)-Université Paris 13 (UP13)-Hôpital Avicenne, Optimisation Thérapeutique en Neuropsychopharmacologie (VariaPsy - U1144), Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7), Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire [Besançon] (CHRU Besançon)-Hôpital Jean Minjoz, Biostatistique et Processus Spatiaux (BIOSP), Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation [Dijon] (CSGA), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-Université de Bourgogne (UB)-AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Technische Universität Berlin (TUB), Università degli Studi dell'Aquila [L'Aquila] (UNIVAQ.IT), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (NOVA), Faculdade de Engenharia [Porto] (FEUP), Unité de recherche Amélioration, Génétique et Physiologie Forestières (UAGPF), IRCELYON-Caractérisation et remédiation des polluants dans l'air et l'eau (CARE), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL), Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut National Polytechnique (Toulouse) (Toulouse INP), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - Toulouse (INSA Toulouse), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Toulouse 1 Capitole (UT1)-Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J), Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques (UM2)-Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Chimie de Montpellier (ENSCM)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [Spain] (CSIC), École normale supérieure - Lyon (ENS Lyon)-Université Lumière - Lyon 2 (UL2)-INRP-Ecole Normale Supérieure Lettres et Sciences Humaines-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Sciences et Technologies - Bordeaux 1-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Sciences et Technologies - Bordeaux 1-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-École pratique des hautes études (EPHE)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), École normale supérieure - Paris (ENS Paris)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-CHU Grenoble-Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (UT3), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Institut des sciences du cerveau de Toulouse. (ISCT), Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées-CHU Toulouse [Toulouse]-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (UT2J)-CHU Toulouse [Toulouse]-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (APHP)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7), Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 (UJF)-CHU Grenoble-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Emile, J, Julie, C, Le Malicot, K, Lepage, C, Tabernero, J, Mini, E, Folprecht, G, Van Laethem, J, Dimet, S, Boulagnon-Rombi, C, Allard, M, Penault-Llorca, F, Bennouna, J, Laurent-Puig, P, Taieb, J, Bidoli, P, Emile, J. -F., Julie, C., Le Malicot, K., Lepage, C., Tabernero, J., Mini, E., Folprecht, G., Van Laethem, J. -L., Dimet, S., Boulagnon-Rombi, C., Allard, M. -A., Penault-Llorca, F., Bennouna, J., Laurent-Puig, P., Taieb, J., Thaler, J., Greil, R., Gaenzer, J., Eisterer, W., Tschmelitsch, J., Keil, F., Samonigg, H., Zabernigg, A., Schmid, F., Steger, G., Steinacher, R., Andel, J., Jagdt, B., Lang, A., Fridrik, M., Fugger, R., Hofbauer, F., Woell, E., Geissler, D., Lenauer, A., Prager, M., D'Haens, G., Demolin, G., Kerger, J., Deboever, G., Ghillebert, G., Polus, M., Van Cutsem, E., Kalantari, H. R., Delaunoit, T., Goeminne, J. C., Peeters, M., Vergauwe, P., Houbiers, G., Humblet, Y., Janssens, J., Schrijvers, D., Vanderstraeten, E., Vermorken, J., Van Daele, D., Ferrante, M., Forget, F., Hendlisz, A., Yilmaz, M., Nielsen, S. E., Vestermark, L., Larsen, J., Zawadi, M. -A., Bouche, O., Mineur, L., Bennouna-Louridi, J., Dourthe, L. M., Ychou, M., Boucher, E., Pezet, D., Desseigne, F., Ducreux, M., Texereau, P., Miglianico, L., Rougier, P., Fratte, S., Levache, C. -B., Merrouche, Y., Ellis, S., Locher, C., Ramee, J. -F., Garnier, C., Viret, F., Chauffert, B., Cojean-Zelek, I., Michel, P., Lecaille, C., Borel, C., Seitz, J. -F., Smith, D., Lombard-Bohas, C., Andre, T., Gornet, J. -M., Fein, F., Coulon-Sfairi, M. -A., Kaminsky, M. -C., Lagasse, J. -P., Luet, D., Etienne, P. -L., Gasmi, M., Vanoli, A., Nguyen, S., Aparicio, T., Perrier, H., Stremsdoerfer, N., Laplaige, P., Arsene, D., Auby, D., Bedenne, L., Coriat, R., Denis, B., Geoffroy, P., Piot, G., Becouarn, Y., Bordes, G., Deplanque, G., Dupuis, O., Fruge, F., Guimbaud, R., Lecomte, T., Lledo, G., Sobhani, I., Asnacios, A., Azzedine, A., Desauw, C., Galais, M. -P., Gargot, D., Lam, Y. -H., Abakar-Mahamat, A., Berdah, J. -F., Catteau, S., Clavero-Fabri, M. -C., Codoul, J. -F., Legoux, J. -L., Goldfain, D., Guichard, P., Verge, D. P., Provencal, J., Vedrenne, B., Brezault-Bonnet, C., Cleau, D., Desir, J. -P., Fallik, D., Garcia, B., Gaspard, M. -H., Genet, D., Hartwig, J., Krummel, Y., Budnik, T. M., Palascak-Juif, V., Randrianarivelo, H., Rinaldi, Y., Aleba, A., Darut-Jouve, A., de Gramont, A., Hamon, H., Wendehenne, F., Matzdorff, A., Stahl, M. K., Schepp, W., Burk, M., Mueller, L., Geissler, M., Mantovani-Loeffler, L., Hoehler, T., Asperger, W., Kroening, H., von Weikersthal, L. F., Fuxius, S., Groschek, M., Meiler, J., Trarbach, T., Rauh, J., Ziegenhagen, N., Kretzschmar, A., Graeven, U., Nusch, A., von Wichert, G., Hofheinz, R. -D., Kleber, G., Schmidt, K. -H., Vehling-Kaiser, U., Baum, C., Schuette, J., Haag, G. M., Holtkamp, W., Potenberg, J., Reiber, T., Schliesser, G., Schmoll, H. -J., Schneider-Kappus, W., Abenhardt, W., Denzlinger, C., Henning, J., Marxsen, B., Derigs, H. G., Lambertz, H., Becker-Boost, I., Caca, K., Constantin, C., Decker, T., Eschenburg, H., Gabius, S., Hebart, H., Hoffmeister, A., Horst, H. -A., Kremers, S., Leithaeuser, M., Mueller, S., Wagner, S., Daum, S., Schlegel, F., Stauch, M., Heinemann, V., Maiello, E., Latini, L., Zaniboni, A., Amadori, D., Aprile, G., Barni, S., Mattioli, R., Martoni, A., Passalacqua, R., Nicolini, M., Pasquini, E., Rabbi, C., Aitini, E., Ravaioli, A., Barone, C., Biasco, G., Tamberi, S., Gambi, A., Verusio, C., Marzola, M., Lelli, G., Boni, C., Cascinu, S., Bidoli, P., Vaghi, M., Cruciani, G., Di Costanzo, F., Sobrero, A., Petrioli, R., Aglietta, M., Alabiso, O., Capuzzo, F., Falcone, A., Corsi, D. C., Labianca, R., Salvagni, S., Chiara, S., Ciuffreda, L., Ferrau, F., Giuliani, F., Lonardi, S., Gebbia, N., Mantovani, G., Sanches, E., Mellidez, J. C., Santos, P., Freire, J., Sarmento, C., Costa, L., Pinto, A. M., Barroso, S., Santo, J. E., Guedes, F., Monteiro, A., Sa, A., Furtado, I., Salazar, R., Aguilar, E. A., Herrero, F. R., Valera, J. S., Ayerbes, M. V., Batlle, J. F., Gil, S., Esteve, A. A., Garcia-Giron, C., Vivanco, G. L., Salvia, A. S., Orduna, V. A., Garcia, R. V., Gallego, J., Sureda, B. M., Remon, J., Safont Aguilera, M. J., Nogueras, L. C., Merino, B. Q., Castro, C. G., de Prado, P. M., Pericay, C. P., Figueiras, M. C., Jordan, I. G., Gome Reina, M. J., Garcia, A. L. -L., Garcia-Ramos, A. A., Cervantes, A., Martos, C. F., Gaspar, E. M., Montero, I. C., Emperador, P. E., Carbonero, A. L., Castillo, M. G., Garcia, T. G., Lopez, J. G., Flores, E. G., Morales, M. G., Munoz, M. L., Martin, A. L., Maurel, J., Camara, J. C., Garcia, R. D., Salgado, M., Busquier, I. H., Ruiz, T. C., Munoa, A. L., Aliguer, M. N., de Taranco, A. V. O., Urena, M. M., Gaspa, F. L., Ponce, J. J., Roig, C. B., Jimenez, P. V., Brotons, A. G., Rodriguez, S. A., Martinez, J. A., Ruiz, L. C., Ruiz, M. C., Bridgewater, J., Glynne-Jones, R., Tahir, S., Hickish, T., Cassidy, J., and Samuel, L.
Subjects: 0301 basic medicine, Oncology, Male, Cancer Research, Organoplatinum Compounds, Colorectal cancer, medicine.medical_treatment, Medizin, Leucovorin, Prospective cohort study, [ SDV.CAN ] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer, 0302 clinical medicine, FOLFOX, Organoplatinum Compounds/therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, tudy, Lymphocytes, Prospective Studies, Leucovorin/therapeutic use, Middle Aged, Prognosis, 3. Good health, Colorectal carcinoma, Fluorouracil, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Predictive value of tests, Colonic Neoplasms, Biomarker (medicine), Lymphocytes/pathology, Female, Adjuvant, medicine.drug, Adult, medicine.medical_specialty, [SDV.CAN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer, Fluorouracil/therapeutic use, Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis, 03 medical and health sciences, Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating, Predictive Value of Tests, Biomarker, Immune response, Internal medicine, medicine, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Survival analysis, Aged, business.industry, medicine.disease, Survival Analysis, Surgery, 030104 developmental biology, Prospective cohort&nbsp, Multivariate Analysis, Colonic Neoplasms/diagnosis, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use, business
Abstract: IF 6.029; International audience; BackgroundThe prognostic value of lymphocyte infiltration (LI) of colorectal carcinoma (CC) has been demonstrated by several groups. However, no validated test is currently available for clinical practice. We previously described an automated and reproducible method for testing LI and aimed to validate it for clinical use.Patients and methodsAccording to National Institutes of Health criteria, we designed a prospective validation of this biomarker in patients included in the PETACC8 phase III study. Primary objective was to compare percentage of patients alive and without recurrence at 2 years in patients with high versus low LI (#NCT02364024). Associations of LI with patient recurrence and survival were analysed, and multivariable models were adjusted for treatment and relevant factors. Automated testing of LI was performed on virtual slides without access to clinical data.ResultsAmong the 1220 CC patients enrolled, LI was high, low and not evaluable in 241 (19.8%), 790 (64.8%) and 189 (15.5%), respectively. Primary objective was met with a 2-year recurrence rate of 14.4% versus 21.1% in patients with high and low LI, respectively (p = 0.02). Patients with high LI also had better disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Tumour stage, grade, RAS status and BRAF status were with LI the only prognostic markers in multivariable analysis for OS. Subgroup analyses revealed that high LI had better DFS and OS in mismatch repair (MMR) proficient patients, and in patients without RAS mutation, but not in MMR deficient and RAS mutated patients.ConclusionAlthough this is the first validation with high level of evidence (IIB) of the prognostic value of a LI test in colon cancers, it still needs to be confirmed in independent series of colon cancer patients.
Published: 2017
Full Text: View/download PDF

31. Impact of BRAF and RAS mutations on first-line efficacy of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab: analysis of the FIRE-3 (AIO KRK-0306) study

Author: A. Jagenburg, Thomas Kirchner, Lisa Miller-Phillips, S.-E. Al-Batran, Swantje Held, Christoph Kahl, Martina Stauch, Sebastian Stintzing, M. Moehler, Werner Scheithauer, G. Seipelt, Dominik Paul Modest, Thomas Decker, Tobias Heintges, Andreas Jung, Alexander Kiani, L. Fischer von Weikersthal, Volker Heinemann, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, and Frank Kullmann
Subjects: 0301 basic medicine, Neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog, Oncology, Male, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Bevacizumab, Colorectal cancer, Leucovorin, Cetuximab, medicine.disease_cause, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Internal medicine, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, medicine, Humans, neoplasms, Survival analysis, Aged, Retrospective Studies, business.industry, Liver Neoplasms, Exons, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, digestive system diseases, Irinotecan, 030104 developmental biology, Treatment Outcome, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Mutation, FOLFIRI, Camptothecin, Female, KRAS, Fluorouracil, business, Colorectal Neoplasms, medicine.drug
Abstract: Background RAS and BRAF mutations have been identified as negative prognostic factors in metastatic colorectal cancer. Efficacy of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab in patients with RAS-mutant tumours needs to be further evaluated. Whether to treat patients with BRAF-mutant tumours with either bevacizumab or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies remains unclear. Methods Patients treated within the FIRE-3 trial were retrospectively tested for BRAF and RAS mutations using formalin fixated paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumour material applying pyrosequencing for KRAS and NRAS exon 2, 3 and 4 mutations as far as for BRAF mutations. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan–Meier estimation and differences were expressed using the log-rank test. Overall response rate (ORR) was compared using Fisher's exact test. Data from a central independent radiological response evaluation were used to calculate early tumour shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR). Results Overall, 188 patients with RAS-mutant tumours and 48 with BRAF-mutant tumours were identified. In BRAF-mutant patients, ORR was numerically higher in the cetuximab versus the bevacizumab arm (52% versus 40%), while comparable results were achieved for progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.84, p = 0.56) and overall survival (OS; HR 0.79, p = 0.45). RAS mutation was associated with a trend towards lower ORR (37% versus 50.5%, p = 0.11) and shorter PFS (7.4 versus 9.7 months; HR 1.25; p = 0.14) in patients receiving FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus bevacizumab, but OS was comparable (19.1 versus 20.1 months; HR 1.05; p = 0.73), respectively. ETS identified subgroups sensitive to cetuximab-based treatment in both BRAF- (9/17) and RAS-mutant (18/48) patients and was associated with significantly longer OS. DpR was comparable between both treatment arms in RAS- and BRAF-mutant patients, respectively. Conclusions In BRAF- and RAS-mutant patients, cetuximab- and bevacizumab-based treatment had comparable survival times. ETS represents an early parameter associated with the benefit from anti-EGFR, while this was not the case with vascular endothelial growth factor A blockade.
Published: 2017

32. Poor efficacy and tolerability of R-CHOP in relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia and Richter transformation

Author: Petra Langerbeins, Nadine Anheier, Jan Dürig, Clemens-Martin Wendtner, Hans-Jürgen Hurtz, Michael Hallek, Paula Cramer, Stephan Stilgenbauer, Martina Stauch, Anna-Maria Fink, Raymonde Busch, Kirsten Fischer, Manuela Bergmann, Hartmut Döhner, Barbara Eichhorst, and Maria-Elisabeth Goebeler
Subjects: Vincristine, medicine.medical_specialty, Cyclophosphamide, business.industry, Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Hematology, medicine.disease, Gastroenterology, Surgery, Fludarabine, Transplantation, Tolerability, Prednisone, hemic and lymphatic diseases, Internal medicine, medicine, Rituximab, business, medicine.drug
Abstract: This phase II trial evaluated efficacy and tolerability of R-CHOP for up to 8 courses in Richter transformation (RT) and up to 6 courses in CLL plus autoimmune cytopenia (AIC) or high-risk (HR) features. HR was defined as fludarabine-refractoriness or early relapse (
Published: 2014
Full Text: View/download PDF

33. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

Author: Dominik Paul Modest, G. Seipelt, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran, Reinhard Udo Lindig, Martina Stauch, Christian A. Lerchenmuller, Hartmut Link, Christoph Kahl, Tobias Heintges, Thomas Kirchner, Jörg Hielscher, Heinz-Gert Höffkes, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Norbert Niederle, Thomas Decker, Sebastian Müller, Andreas Jung, Lisa Rossius, Volker Heinemann, Werner Scheithauer, Andreas Rost, Michael Scholz, Markus Moehler, Sebastian Stintzing, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Frank Kullmann, and Alexander Kiani
Subjects: Oncology, medicine.medical_specialty, FOLFOXIRI, Cetuximab, Performance status, Bevacizumab, business.industry, medicine.disease_cause, Irinotecan, Internal medicine, medicine, FOLFIRI, KRAS, business, Survival rate, medicine.drug
Abstract: Summary Background Cetuximab and bevacizumab have both been shown to improve outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer when added to chemotherapy regimens; however, their comparative effectiveness when partnered with first-line fluorouracil, folinic acid, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) is unknown. We aimed to compare these agents in patients with KRAS (exon 2) codon 12/13 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients aged 18–75 years with stage IV, histologically confirmed colorectal cancer, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0–2, an estimated life expectancy of greater than 3 months, and adequate organ function, from centres in Germany and Austria. Patients were centrally randomised by fax (1:1) to FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (using permuted blocks of randomly varying size), stratified according to ECOG performance status, number of metastatic sites, white blood cell count, and alkaline phosphatase concentration. The primary endpoint was objective response analysed by intention to treat. The study has completed recruitment, but follow-up of participants is ongoing. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00433927. Findings Between Jan 23, 2007, and Sept 19, 2012, 592 patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type tumours were randomly assigned and received treatment (297 in the FOLFIRI plus cetuximab group and 295 in the FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab group). 184 (62·0%, 95% CI 56·2–67·5) patients in the cetuximab group achieved an objective response compared with 171 (58·0%, 52·1–63·7) in the bevacizumab group (odds ratio 1·18, 95% CI 0·85–1·64; p=0·18). Median progression-free survival was 10·0 months (95% CI 8·8–10·8) in the cetuximab group and 10·3 months (9·8–11·3) in the bevacizumab group (hazard ratio [HR] 1·06, 95% CI 0·88–1·26; p=0·55); however, median overall survival was 28·7 months (95% CI 24·0–36·6) in the cetuximab group compared with 25·0 months (22·7–27·6) in the bevacizumab group (HR 0·77, 95% CI 0·62–0·96; p=0·017). Safety profiles were consistent with the known side-effects of the study drugs. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in both treatment groups were haematotoxicity (73 [25%] of 297 patients in the cetuximab group vs 62 [21%] of 295 patients in the bevacizumab group), skin reactions (77 [26%] vs six [2%]), and diarrhoea (34 [11%] vs 40 [14%]). Interpretation Although the proportion of patients who achieved an objective response did not significantly differ between the FOLFIRI plus cetuximab and FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab groups, the association with longer overall survival suggests that FOLFIRI plus cetuximab could be the preferred first-line regimen for patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Funding Merck KGaA.
Published: 2014
Full Text: View/download PDF

34. Left-sided primary tumors are associated with favorable prognosis in patients with KRAS codon 12/13 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab plus chemotherapy: an analysis of the AIO KRK-0104 trial

Author: Stefan Boeck, Swantje Held, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Volker Heinemann, Clemens Giessen, T. Kirchner, J. C. von Einem, Andreas Jung, Martina Stauch, Philipp Aubele, L. Fischer von Weikersthal, C Schulz, Michael Haas, Thomas Decker, Sebastian Stintzing, Holger G. Hass, Julian Walter Holch, S. Klein, Marlies Michl, and Dominik Paul Modest
Subjects: Adult, Male, Oncology, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Colorectal cancer, medicine.medical_treatment, Original Article – Clinical Oncology, Cetuximab, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, medicine.disease_cause, Disease-Free Survival, Capecitabine, Internal medicine, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, CAPIRI plus cetuximab, medicine, Humans, Codon, neoplasms, Aged, Chemotherapy, business.industry, KRAS mutation status, CAPOX plus cetuximab, General Medicine, Middle Aged, Prognosis, medicine.disease, Primary tumor, digestive system diseases, Oxaliplatin, Irinotecan, ras Proteins, Female, Primary tumor location, KRAS, Colorectal Neoplasms, business, medicine.drug
Abstract: Purpose AIO KRK-0104 investigated first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with cetuximab, capecitabine and irinotecan versus cetuximab, capecitabine and oxaliplatin. This analysis investigated the impact of primary tumor location on outcome of patients. Patients and methods Left-sided primary tumors were defined as tumors from rectum to left flexure, while tumors in the remaining colon were regarded right sided. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate were correlated with primary tumor location. A Cox regression model was used to evaluate interaction between primary tumor location and KRAS mutation. Results Of 146 patients of the AIO KRK-0104 trial, 100 patients presented left-sided (of those 68 KRAS codon 12/13 wild-type) and 46 patients right-sided primary tumors (of those 27 KRAS codon 12/13 wild-type). Left-sided tumors were associated with significantly longer OS (p = 0.016, HR = 0.63) and PFS (p = 0.02, HR = 0.67) as compared to right-sided tumors. These effects were present in the KRAS codon 12/13 wild-type population (HR OS: 0.42; HR PFS: 0.54), while no impact of primary tumor location was evident in patients with KRAS codon 12/13 mutant tumors (HR OS: 1.3; HR PFS: 1.01). A significant interaction of KRAS status and primary tumor location concerning OS and PFS was observed. Conclusion Our findings suggest that primary tumor location and KRAS codon 12/13 mutational status interact on the outcome of patients with mCRC receiving cetuximab-based first-line therapy. Left-sided primary tumor location might be a predictor of cetuximab efficacy.
Published: 2014
Full Text: View/download PDF

35. Interactions between comorbidity and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: results of German Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Study Group trials

Author: Barbara Eichhorst, Georg Hopfinger, Martina Stauch, Valentin Goede, Hartmut Döhner, Anne Westermann, Stephan Stilgenbauer, Clemens M. Wendtner, Raymonde Busch, Michael Hallek, Manuela Bergmann, and Paula Cramer
Subjects: Adult, Male, Oncology, medicine.medical_specialty, Cyclophosphamide, Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Population, Comorbidity, Risk Factors, Germany, Internal medicine, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, medicine, Humans, education, Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Aged, 80 and over, education.field_of_study, Chlorambucil, business.industry, Articles, Hematology, Middle Aged, Prognosis, medicine.disease, Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell, Fludarabine, Leukemia, Treatment Outcome, Hematologic disease, Immunology, Female, business, medicine.drug
Abstract: This study investigated the impact of comorbidity in 555 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia enrolled in two trials of the German Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Study Group on first-line treatment with fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide, fludarabine, or chlorambucil. Patients with two or more comorbidities and patients with less than two comorbidities differed in overall survival (71.7 versus 90.2 months; P
Published: 2014
Full Text: View/download PDF

36. Effect of patient age on efficacy of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab vs bevacizumab in 1st-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: An analysis of FIRE-3 (AIO KRK 0306)

Author: Dominik Paul Modest, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran, Thomas Kirchner, Sebastian Stintzing, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Alexander Kiani, G. Seipelt, Swantje Held, Christoph Kahl, Frank Kullmann, Thomas Decker, Andreas Jung, Florian Kaiser, Christian A. Lerchenmuller, Volker Heinemann, Werner Scheithauer, Tobias Heintges, and Martina Stauch
Subjects: Oncology, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Cetuximab, Bevacizumab, business.industry, Colorectal cancer, medicine.disease_cause, medicine.disease, Patient age, Internal medicine, medicine, FOLFIRI, KRAS, business, medicine.drug
Abstract: 3541 Background: FIRE-3 compared 1st-line therapy with FOLFIRI plus either cetuximab or bevacizumab in 592 KRAS exon 2 wt mCRC patients. The subgroup of extended RASwt patients consisted of 400 patients. The median age of patients treated in FIRE-3 was 64 years. Analyses of efficacy of doublet-chemotherapy in patients >70 years have shown inconsistent results. Methods: In this exploratory analysis, patients were grouped into cohorts with 65 years and 70 years as a cut-off for age-related analysis of the FIRE-3 study population. ORR was compared using Fisher´s exact test, Survival analyses were done using Kaplan-Meier estimation and median survival times were compared using log-rank testing. Results: Within the RAS wt population, patients older than 70 years had a significantly shorter OS when compared to patients ≤70 years of age in both arms (p= 0.02 for cetuximab arm, p= 0.02 for bevacizumab arm). Patients ≤65 years and ≤70 years had a significantly longer OS when treated with FOLFIRI plus cetuximab compared to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (p= 0.01 and 0.02 respectively). The OS benefit of cetuximab treated patients compared to bevacizumab treated patients was consistent for patients ≤65 years (p=0.005) and patients ≤70 years (p= 0.009) of age. In patients older than 70 years, however, comparable efficacy of bevacizumab and cetuximab was observed. This effect of age on outcome appears to be affected by sidedness. RAS wt population (n=400). Conclusions: In the overall RAS wt population, younger patients have a significant OS benefit when treated with FOLFIRI plus cetuximab compared to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab, while this was not the case in patients older than 70 years.[Table: see text]
Published: 2019
Full Text: View/download PDF

37. Chemosensitivity Testing of Circulating Epithelial Tumor Cells (CETC) in Vitro: Correlation to in Vivo Sensitivity and Clinical Outcome

Author: Ernst-Ludwig Stein, Katharina Pachmann, Carola Rabenstein, Martina Stauch, Gabriele Spitz, Ingo B. Runnebaum, Erika Schill, Matthias Rengsberger, Nadine Rüdiger, and Ulrich Pachmann
Subjects: Pathology, medicine.medical_specialty, Chemotherapy, Membrane permeability, business.industry, medicine.medical_treatment, medicine.disease, Blood cell, medicine.anatomical_structure, Circulating tumor cell, In vivo, medicine, Cancer research, Ovarian cancer, business, Adjuvant, Chemosensitivity assay
Abstract: Background: Chemotherapy is a mainstay of tumor therapy, however, it is predominantly applied according to empirically developed recommendations derived from statistical relapse rates occurring years after the treatment in the adjuvant situation and from progression-free interval data in the metastatic situation, without any possibility of individually determining the efficacy in the adjuvant situation and with loss of time and quality of life in the metastatic situation if the drugs chosen are not effective. Here, we present a method to determine the efficiency of chemotherapeutic drugs using tumor cells circulating in blood as the part of the tumor actually available in the patient’s body for chemosensitivity testing. Methodology/Principal Findings: After only red blood cell lysis, omitting any enrichment (analogous to other blood cell enumeration methods, including rare CD34 cells), the white cells comprising the circulating epithelial tumor cells (CETC) are exposed to the drugs in question in different concentrations and for different periods of time. Staining with a fluorescence-labeled anti-epithelial antibody detects both vital and dying tumor cells, distinguishing vital from dying cells through membrane permeability and nuclear staining with propidium iodide. Increasing percentages of dying tumor cells are observed dependent on time and concentration. The sensitivity can vary during therapy and was correlated with decrease or increase in CETC and clinical outcome. Conclusions/Significance: Thus, we are able to show that chemosensitivity testing of circulating tumor cells provides real-time information about the sensitivity of the tumor present in the patient, even at different times during therapy, and correlates with treatment success.
Published: 2013
Full Text: View/download PDF

38. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a post-hoc analysis of tumour dynamics in the final RAS wild-type subgroup of this randomised open-label phase 3 trial

Author: Markus Moehler, Werner Scheithauer, Dominik Paul Modest, Markus M. Lerch, Andreas Jung, Frank Kullmann, Thomas Kirchner, Martina Stauch, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran, Sebastian Stintzing, Lisa Rossius, G. Seipelt, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Christian A. Lerchenmuller, Volker Heinemann, Thomas Decker, Andreas Jagenburg, Tobias Heintges, Swantje Held, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Clemens Giessen-Jung, Alexander Kiani, and Christoph Kahl
Subjects: 0301 basic medicine, Oncology, Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Bevacizumab, Colorectal cancer, Population, Leucovorin, Cetuximab, medicine.disease_cause, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, Internal medicine, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Medicine, Humans, Neoplasm Metastasis, education, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Aged, education.field_of_study, business.industry, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Irinotecan, 030104 developmental biology, Genes, ras, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, FOLFIRI, Camptothecin, Female, KRAS, Fluorouracil, business, Colorectal Neoplasms, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, medicine.drug
Abstract: Summary Background FIRE-3 compared first-line 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus cetuximab with FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. The same study also reported an exploratory analysis of a subgroup of patients with tumours that were wild-type at other RAS genes ( KRAS and NRAS exons 2–4). We report here efficacy results for the FIRE-3 final RAS ( KRAS/NRAS , exons 2–4) wild-type subgroup. Moreover, new metrics of tumour dynamics were explored during a centralised radiological review to investigate how FOLFIRI plus cetuximab conferred overall survival benefit in the absence of differences in investigator-assessed objective responses and progression-free survival. Methods FIRE-3 was a randomised phase 3 trial comparing FOLFIRI plus cetuximab with FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. The primary endpoint of the FIRE-3 study was the proportion of patients achieving an objective response according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.0 in the intention-to-treat population. A centralised radiological review of CT scans was done in a post-hoc analysis to assess objective response according to RECIST 1.1, early tumour shrinkage, depth of response, duration of response, and time to response in the final RAS wild-type subgroup. Comparisons between treatment groups with respect to objective response rate and early tumour shrinkage were made using Fisher's exact test (two-sided), while differences in depth of response were investigated with a two-sided Wilcoxon test. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00433927. Findings In the final RAS wild-type population (n=400), median overall survival was better in the FOLFIRI plus cetuximab group than the FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab group (33·1 months [95% CI 24·5–39·4] vs 25·0 months [23·0–28·1]; hazard ratio 0·70 [0·54–0·90]; p=0·0059), although investigator-assessed objective response and progression-free survival were comparable between treatment groups. Centralised radiological review of CT-assessable patients (n=330) showed that the proportion of patients achieving an objective response (113 of 157, 72·0% [95% CI 64·3–78·8] vs 97 of 173, 56·1% [48·3–63·6]; p=0·0029), frequency of early tumour shrinkage (107 of 157, 68·2% [60·3–75·4] vs 85 of 173, 49·1% [41·5–56·8]; p=0·0005), and median depth of response (–48·9% [–54·3 to −42·0] vs −32·3% [–38·2 to −29·2]; p RAS wild-type patients receiving FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus those receiving FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab. No differences in duration of response and time to response were observed between treatment groups. Interpretation This analysis provides a new framework that connects alternative metrics of response to overall survival. Superior response-related outcome parameters, such as early tumour shrinkage and depth of response, obtained by centralised radiological review correlated with the overall survival benefit conferred by FOLFIRI plus cetuximab compared with FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the extended RAS wild-type subgroup. Funding Merck KGaA and Pfizer.
Published: 2016

39. CEA response is associated with tumor response and survival in patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type and extended RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab (FIRE-3 trial)

Author: Sebastian Stintzing, L. Fischer von Weikersthal, S-E. Al-Batran, Marlies Michl, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Dominik Paul Modest, Christian Lerchenmueller, Tobias Heintges, Markus M. Lerch, Christoph Kahl, Alexander Kiani, Markus Scholz, Werner Scheithauer, Frank Kullmann, Sebastian Mueller, Jörg Hielscher, Thomas Decker, Volker Heinemann, T. Kirchner, G. Seipelt, Martina Stauch, and Andreas Jung
Subjects: 0301 basic medicine, Oncology, Male, Colorectal cancer, Leucovorin, Cetuximab, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, medicine.disease_cause, 0302 clinical medicine, Carcinoembryonic antigen, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Medicine, education.field_of_study, biology, Hematology, Exons, Middle Aged, Bevacizumab, Fluorouracil, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, FOLFIRI, Female, KRAS, Colorectal Neoplasms, medicine.drug, Adult, medicine.medical_specialty, Population, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Disease-Free Survival, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), 03 medical and health sciences, Internal medicine, Humans, education, neoplasms, Aged, business.industry, medicine.disease, digestive system diseases, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, 030104 developmental biology, Mutation, biology.protein, Camptothecin, business
Abstract: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) response may be a surrogate for response and long-term outcome in (K)RAS wild-type mCRC receiving first-line targeted therapy. FOLFIRI and cetuximab induced a greater CEA response than FOLFIRI and bevacizumab. CEA response correlated with longer survival. Hypothesizing that CEA reflects tumor burden, greater CEA response may indicate greater antitumor efficacy.To examine the relation of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) response with tumor response and survival in patients with (K)RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy in the FIRE-3 trial comparing FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab. CEA response assessed as the percentage of CEA decrease from baseline to nadir was evaluated for its association with tumor response and survival. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed an optimal cut-off value of 75% using the maximum of sensitivity and specificity for CEA response to discriminate CEA responders from non-responders. In addition, the time to CEA nadir was calculated. Of 592 patients in the intent-to-treat population, 472 were eligible for analysis of CEA (cetuximab arm: 230 and bevacizumab arm: 242). Maximal relative CEA decrease (%) significantly (P = 0.003) differed between the cetuximab arm (median 83.0%;IQR 40.9%-94.7%) and the bevacizumab arm (median 72.3%;IQR 26.3%-91.0%). In a longitudinal analysis, the CEA decrease occurred faster in the cetuximab arm and was greater than in the bevacizumab arm at all evaluated time points until 56 weeks after treatment start. CEA nadir occurred after 3.3 months (cetuximab arm) and 3.5 months (bevacizumab arm), (P = 0.49). In the cetuximab arm, CEA responders showed a significantly longer progression-free survival [11.8 versus 7.4 months;hazard ratio (HR) 1.53;95% Cl, 1.15-2.04;P = 0.004] and longer overall survival (36.6 versus 21.3 months;HR 1.73;95% Cl, 1.24-2.43;P = 0.001) than CEA non-responders. Analysis of extended RAS wild-type patients revealed similar results. In the FIRE-3 trial, CEA decrease was significantly faster and greater in the cetuximab arm than in the bevacizumab arm and correlated with the prolonged survival observed in patients receiving FOLFIRI plus cetuximab. NCT00433927 (ClinicalTrials.gov);AIO KRK0306 FIRE-3.
Published: 2016

40. Correlation of capecitabine-induced skin toxicity with treatment efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the German AIO KRK-0104 trial

Author: Clemens Giessen, Nicolas Moosmann, Thomas Decker, M. Schulze, Sebastian Stintzing, Herbert W. Kappauf, H. Dietzfelbinger, Martina Stauch, Gerhard Puchtler, S. Klein, W. Abenhardt, Holger G. Hass, L. Fischer von Weikersthal, Daniel Oruzio, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Volker Heinemann, Johann Mittermüller, Christopher Haberl, and Klaus Zellmann
Subjects: Male, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Colorectal cancer, Cetuximab, colorectal cancer, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Irinotecan, Gastroenterology, Deoxycytidine, Skin Diseases, Capecitabine, chemistry.chemical_compound, Internal medicine, Germany, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, medicine, Humans, Neoplasm Metastasis, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Clinical Trials as Topic, business.industry, Incidence, Carcinoma, Cancer, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Prognosis, skin toxicity, Surgery, Oxaliplatin, Treatment Outcome, Oncology, chemistry, Fluorouracil, Clinical Study, Camptothecin, Female, business, Colorectal Neoplasms, medicine.drug
Abstract: Background: The AIO KRK-0104 randomised phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of two capecitabine-based regimens: combination of capecitabine and irinotecan (CAPIRI) plus cetuximab (CAPIRI-C) and combination of capecitabine with oxaliplatin (CAPOX) plus cetuximab (CAPOX-C) in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Treatment-related skin toxicity (ST) was evaluated separately for capecitabine and cetuximab. The present analysis investigates the correlation of capecitabine-attributed ST (Cape-ST) and parameters of treatment efficacy. Methods: Patients with mCRC were randomised to cetuximab (400 mg m−2, day 1, followed by 250 mg m−2 weekly) plus CAPIRI (irinotecan 200 mg m−2, day 1; capecitabine 800 mg m−2, twice daily, days 1–14, every 3 weeks), or cetuximab plus CAPOX (oxaliplatin 130 mg m−2, day 1; capecitabine 1000 mg m−2, twice daily, days 1–14, every 3 weeks). Results: Of 185 recruited patients, 149 (CAPIRI-C, n=78; CAPOX-C, n=71) received study treatment beyond the first tumour assessment and were evaluable for efficacy. Capecitabine-attributed ST, predominantly hand–foot syndrome, was observed in 32.2% of patients. Capecitabine-attributed ST grade 1–3 was associated with a significantly higher disease control rate (DCR) (97.9 vs 86.1%, P=0.038) compared with grade 0 toxicity. Moreover, Cape-ST grade 1–3 related to a markedly longer progression-free survival (PFS) (9.9 vs 5.6 months, P
Published: 2011

41. Cetuximab Plus Capecitabine and Irinotecan Compared With Cetuximab Plus Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin As First-Line Treatment for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: AIO KRK-0104—A Randomized Trial of the German AIO CRC Study Group

Author: Herbert W. Kappauf, W. Abenhardt, Daniel Oruzio, S. Klein, Thomas Decker, Nicolas Moosmann, M. Schulze, Sebastian Stintzing, Martina Stauch, Volker Heinemann, Andreas Schalhorn, Herrmann Dietzfelbinger, Gerhard Puchtler, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Christopher Haberl, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Holger G. Hass, Andreas Jung, Johann Mittermüller, and Klaus Zellmann
Subjects: Male, Oncology, Cancer Research, Time Factors, Organoplatinum Compounds, Colorectal cancer, Cetuximab, medicine.disease_cause, Deoxycytidine, Germany, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, education.field_of_study, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Middle Aged, Oxaliplatin, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Female, Fluorouracil, KRAS, Colorectal Neoplasms, medicine.drug, Adult, medicine.medical_specialty, Population, Adenocarcinoma, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Irinotecan, Disease-Free Survival, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Capecitabine, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Internal medicine, medicine, Humans, education, Survival rate, Aged, business.industry, medicine.disease, Survival Analysis, Surgery, Mutation, ras Proteins, Camptothecin, business
Abstract: Purpose The AIO KRK-0104 randomized phase II trial investigated the efficacy and safety of cetuximab combined with capecitabine and irinotecan (CAPIRI) or capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and Methods A total of 185 patients with mCRC were randomly assigned to cetuximab (400 mg/m2 day 1, followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly) plus CAPIRI (irinotecan 200 mg/m2, day 1; capecitabine 800 mg/m2 twice daily days 1 through 14, every 3 weeks; or cetuximab plus CAPOX (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 day 1; capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 twice daily day 1 through 14, every 3 weeks). The primary study end point was objective response rate (ORR). Results In the intention-to-treat patient population (n = 177), ORR was 46% (95% CI, 35 to 57) for CAPIRI plus cetuximab versus 48% (95% CI, 37 to 59) for CAPOX plus cetuximab. Analysis of the KRAS gene mutation status was performed in 81.4% of the intention to treat population. Patients with KRAS wild-type in the CAPIRI plus cetuximab arm showed an ORR of 50.0%, a PFS of 6.2 months and an OS of 21.1 months. In the CAPOX plus cetuximab arm, an ORR of 44.9%, a PFS of 7.1 months and an OS of 23.5 months were observed. While ORR and PFS were comparable in KRAS wild-type and mutant subgroups, a trend toward longer survival was associated with KRAS wild-type. Both regimens had manageable toxicity profiles and were safe. Conclusion This randomized trial demonstrates that the addition of cetuximab to CAPIRI or CAPOX is effective and safe in first-line treatment of mCRC. In the analyzed regimens, ORR and PFS did not differ according to KRAS gene mutation status.
Published: 2011
Full Text: View/download PDF

42. Phase III trial of irinotecan plus infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid versus irinotecan plus oxaliplatin as first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

Author: Daniel Oruzio, Thomas Zwingers, Karin Weigang-Köhler, Juergen Truckenbrodt, Ute Vehling-Kaiser, Andreas Schalhorn, Peter A. Maubach, Volker Heinemann, Daniel Bosse, Helmut Lambertz, Johann Mittermüller, Manfred Schulze, Marc Grundeis, Rudolf Schlag, Borika Szukics, D. Quietzsch, Clemens Giessen, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Mariele Goebeler, and Martina Stauch
Subjects: Adult, Male, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Organoplatinum Compounds, Colorectal cancer, medicine.medical_treatment, Leucovorin, Adenocarcinoma, Irinotecan, Gastroenterology, Disease-Free Survival, Young Adult, Folinic acid, Internal medicine, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, medicine, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Aged, Chemotherapy, Rectal Neoplasms, business.industry, Standard treatment, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Surgery, Oxaliplatin, Oncology, Tolerability, Fluorouracil, Colonic Neoplasms, Camptothecin, Female, business, medicine.drug
Abstract: Purpose To determine whether irinotecan plus oxaliplatin (mIROX) is superior to irinotecan plus infusional 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin (FUFIRI) as first-line therapy of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients and methods A phase III, randomised, open-label multicentre study compared standard treatment with FUFIRI (irinotecan 80 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil 2000 mg/m2, folinic acid 500 mg/m2 weekly times 6) to mIROX using an identical schedule of irinotecan plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 applied on days 1, 15 and 29 of a 7-week cycle. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results A total of 479 eligible patients were randomly assigned. Progression-free survival was 7.2 months in the mIROX arm and 8.2 months in the FUFIRI arm [hazard ratio = 1.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94–1.37; P = 0.178]. Comparable results were also obtained for overall survival time with 19 months in the mIROX-arm and 22 months in the FUFIRI-arm (hazard ratio = 1.08, P = 0.276). Both regimens induced an identical objective response rate (ORR) of 41%, but disease control rate (ORR plus stable disease) was significantly greater in the FUFIRI group (81% versus 68%, P = 0.001). Most frequent grades 1–4 side-effects of mIROX and FUFIRI treatment were nausea (80% versus 73%) and delayed diarrhoea (79% versus 68%). Grades 3–4 toxicities were generally below 10%, except for diarrhoea which was more frequent in the mIROX-arm compared to the FUFIRI-arm (19% versus 30%, P = 0.006) Conclusion mIROX failed to show superior activity compared to high-dose 5-FU/folinic acid plus irinotecan. Due to better tolerability the combination of high-dose 5-FU/folinic acid and irinotecan remains a standard of care in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
Published: 2011
Full Text: View/download PDF

43. Anagrelide for the Treatment of Thrombocythaemia in Daily Clinical Practice: A Post-Marketing Observational Survey on Efficacy and Safety Performed in Germany

Author: Martina Stauch, Rudolf Schlag, and Stephan Schmitz
Subjects: Adult, Male, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Chronic myeloproliferative disease, Young Adult, hemic and lymphatic diseases, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing, medicine, Humans, Intensive care medicine, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Platelet Count, business.industry, Thrombosis, Hematology, General Medicine, Anagrelide, Middle Aged, Clinical Practice, Oncology, Ischemic Attack, Transient, Quinazolines, Physical therapy, Female, Observational study, business, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Thrombocythemia, Essential, medicine.drug
Abstract: Myeloproliferative diseases - in particular essential thrombocythaemia (ET) - may be associated with increases in platelet count which put patients at risk of life-threatening complications such as thromboses and severe bleedings.This multicentre post-marketing observational survey was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of anagrelide under daily practice conditions in at-risk patients with ET who received anagrelide for the first time.198 patients (median age of 64 years, range 19-88 years) were included, 61.1% of the patients were women. The mean observation time was 6.2 +/- 1.7 months. Treatment with anagrelide lowered the platelet counts by a median of 316 x 10(9)/l from a median of 797 x 10(9)/l at the beginning of the observation to 470 x 10(9)/l at the last observation (log rank test, p0.001). Disease-related complications were reduced during treatment compared to 6 months prior to treatment (transient ischaemic attacks from 1.5 to 0.5%; thromboses from 7.6 to 0%). The number of bleedings remained the same at 1.5%. Adverse events were documented in 46 patients (23.2%). All observed adverse events were similar to those previously reported in clinical studies.Anagrelide was effective in lowering the platelet count and was also well tolerated when used in daily clinical practice.
Published: 2010
Full Text: View/download PDF

44. First-line therapy with fludarabine compared with chlorambucil does not result in a major benefit for elderly patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Author: Barbara F, Eichhorst, Raymonde, Busch, Stephan, Stilgenbauer, Martina, Stauch, Manuela A, Bergmann, Matthias, Ritgen, Nicole, Kranzhöfer, Robert, Rohrberg, Ulrike, Söling, Oswald, Burkhard, Anne, Westermann, Valentin, Goede, Carmen D, Schweighofer, Kirsten, Fischer, Anna-Maria, Fink, Clemens M, Wendtner, Günter, Brittinger, Hartmut, Döhner, Bertold, Emmerich, Michael, Hallek, and M, Sandmann
Subjects: Male, medicine.medical_specialty, medicine.drug_class, Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Immunology, Biochemistry, Gastroenterology, Antimetabolite, Disease-Free Survival, chemistry.chemical_compound, immune system diseases, hemic and lymphatic diseases, Internal medicine, medicine, Humans, Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating, Aged, Hematology, Chlorambucil, business.industry, Remission Induction, Cell Biology, medicine.disease, Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell, Nitrogen mustard, Surgery, Fludarabine, Survival Rate, Clinical trial, Regimen, chemistry, Female, business, Vidarabine, Follow-Up Studies, medicine.drug
Abstract: Although chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is a disease of elderly patients, subjects older than 65 years are heavily underrepresented in clinical trials. The German CLL study group (GCLLSG) initiated a multicenter phase III trial for CLL patients older than 65 years comparing first-line therapy with fludarabine with chlorambucil. A total of 193 patients with a median age of 70 years were randomized to receive fludarabine (25 mg/m2 for 5 days intravenously, every 28 days, for 6 courses) or chlorambucil (0.4 mg/kg body weight [BW] with an increase to 0.8 mg/kg, every 15 days, for 12 months). Fludarabine resulted in a significantly higher overall and complete remission rate (72% vs 51%, P = .003; 7% vs 0%, P = .011). Time to treatment failure was significantly shorter in the chlorambucil arm (11 vs 18 months; P = .004), but no difference in progression-free survival time was observed (19 months with fludarabine, 18 months with chlorambucil; P = .7). Moreover, fludarabine did not increase the overall survival time (46 months in the fludarabine vs 64 months in the chlorambucil arm; P = .15). Taken together, the results suggest that in elderly CLL patients the first-line therapy with fludarabine alone does not result in a major clinical benefit compared with chlorambucil. This trial is registered with www.isrctn.org under identifier ISRCTN 36294212.
Published: 2009
Full Text: View/download PDF

45. Nonplatinum Topotecan Combinations Versus Topotecan Alone for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: Results of a Phase III Study of the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology Ovarian Cancer Study Group

Author: Guelten Oskay-Oezcelik, Jalid Sehouli, Peter Klare, Alain G. Zeimet, Martina Stauch, A. Paulenz, Werner Lichtenegger, Oumar Camara, E. Keil, Dirk Stengel, and Harald Sommer
Subjects: Oncology, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, endocrine system diseases, medicine.medical_treatment, Deoxycytidine, Germany, Internal medicine, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, medicine, Humans, Survival rate, Etoposide, Proportional Hazards Models, Ovarian Neoplasms, Gynecology, Analysis of Variance, Chemotherapy, Chi-Square Distribution, business.industry, Cancer, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, Gemcitabine, Survival Rate, Clinical trial, Treatment Outcome, Quality of Life, Female, Topotecan, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Ovarian cancer, business, medicine.drug
Abstract: Purpose The management of recurrent ovarian cancer remains controversial. Single-agent topotecan is an established treatment option, and preliminary evidence suggests improved tumor control by combining topotecan with etoposide or gemcitabine. Patients and Methods Women with relapsed ovarian cancer after primary surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy were randomly assigned to topotecan monotherapy 1.25 mg/m2/d, topotecan 1.0 mg/m2 plus oral etoposide 50 mg/d, or topotecan 0.5 mg/m2/d plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 on day 1 and 600 mg/m2 on day 8 every 3 weeks. Patients were stratified for platinum-refractory and platinum-sensitive disease according to a recurrence-free interval of less or more than 12 months, respectively. The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points included progression-free survival, objective response rates, toxicity, and quality of life (as measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] 30-item Quality-of-Life Questionnaire). Results The trial enrolled 502 patients with a mean age of 60.5 years (± 10.2 years), 208 of whom were platinum resistant. Median overall survival was 17.2 months (95% CI, 13.5 to 21.9 months) with topotecan, 17.8 months (95% CI, 13.7 to 20.0 months) with topotecan plus etoposide (log-rank P = .7647), and 15.2 months (95% CI, 11.3 to 20.9 months) with topotecan plus gemcitabine (log-rank P = .2344). Platinum-sensitive patients lived significantly longer than platinum-refractory patients (21.9 v 10.6 months). The median progression-free survival was 7.0, 7.8, and 6.3 months, respectively. Objective response rates were 27.8%, 36.1%, and 31.6%, respectively. Patients under combined treatment were at higher risk of severe thrombocytopenia. Conclusion Nonplatinum topotecan combinations do not provide a survival advantage over topotecan alone in women with relapsed ovarian cancer.
Published: 2008
Full Text: View/download PDF

46. Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapOx) versus capecitabine plus gemcitabine (CapGem) versus gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (mGemOx): final results of a multicenter randomized phase II trial in advanced pancreatic cancer

Author: R. Mahlberg, Stefan Boeck, Axel Wein, Martina Stauch, T. Hoehler, Florian Lordick, Sophie Neugebauer, K. Schoppmeyer, Volker Heinemann, H.-P. Boeck, Y. Ko, E. Kettner, M. Geissler, B. Schmid, A. Golf, Andreas Hochhaus, Georgi Kojouharoff, and G. Seipelt
Subjects: Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Adolescent, Maximum Tolerated Dose, Organoplatinum Compounds, Phases of clinical research, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Deoxycytidine, Risk Assessment, Gastroenterology, Disease-Free Survival, Drug Administration Schedule, Capecitabine, Internal medicine, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, medicine, Humans, Single-Blind Method, Progression-free survival, Infusions, Intravenous, Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Probability, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, business.industry, CAPOX Regimen, Hematology, Middle Aged, Immunohistochemistry, Survival Analysis, Gemcitabine, Oxaliplatin, Surgery, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Regimen, Treatment Outcome, Oncology, Tolerability, Female, Fluorouracil, business, Follow-Up Studies, medicine.drug
Abstract: Background To compare the efficacy and safety of three different chemotherapy doublets in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). Patients and methods At total of 190 patients were randomly assigned to receive capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14 plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 (CapOx), capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 (CapGem) or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 8 (mGemOx). Treatment cycles were repeated every three weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 3 months; secondary end points included objective response rate, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 response, clinical benefit response, overall survival and toxicity. Results The PFS rate after 3 months was 51% in the CapOx arm, 64% in the CapGem arm and 60% in the mGemOx arm. Median PFS was estimated with 4.2 months, 5.7 months and 3.9 months, respectively (P = 0.67). Corresponding median survival times were: 8.1 months (CapOx), 9.0 months (CapGem) and 6.9 months (mGemOx) (P = 0.56). Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were more frequent in the two Gem-containing arms; grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity rates did not exceed 15% in any arm. Conclusion CapOx, CapGem and mGemOx have similar clinical efficacy in advanced PC. Each regimen has a distinct but manageable tolerability profile.
Published: 2008
Full Text: View/download PDF

47. Impact of Subsequent Therapies on Outcome of the FIRE-3/AIO KRK0306 Trial: First-Line Therapy With FOLFIRI Plus Cetuximab or Bevacizumab in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Tumors in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Author: Christian A. Lerchenmuller, Tobias Heintges, Martina Stauch, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran, Christoph Kahl, Thomas Decker, Dominik Paul Modest, Volker Heinemann, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal, Werner Scheithauer, Svantje Held, Frank Kullmann, G. Seipelt, Sebastian Stintzing, Thomas Kirchner, Alexander Kiani, Markus Möhler, and Andreas Jung
Subjects: Oncology, Adult, Male, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Bevacizumab, Population, Leucovorin, Cetuximab, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, medicine.disease_cause, Disease-Free Survival, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Internal medicine, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, medicine, Panitumumab, Humans, education, Aged, education.field_of_study, business.industry, Middle Aged, Oxaliplatin, Regimen, Treatment Outcome, FOLFIRI, ras Proteins, Camptothecin, Female, KRAS, Fluorouracil, business, Colorectal Neoplasms, medicine.drug
Abstract: Purpose We investigated choice and efficacy of subsequent treatment, with special focus on second-line therapy, in the FIRE-3 trial (FOLFIRI plus cetuximab [arm A] or bevacizumab [arm B]) for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods Start of subsequent-line (second or third) therapy was defined as use of an antitumor drug that was not part of the previous regimen. We evaluated choice, duration, and efficacy of subsequent therapy and determined the impact of subsequent-line treatment on outcome of patients in FIRE-3. Results Of 592 patients in the intent-to-treat population, 414 (69.9%) received second-line and 256 (43.2%) received third-line therapy. In subsequent treatment lines, 47.1% of patients originally assigned to arm A received bevacizumab, and 52.2% originally assigned to arm B received either cetuximab or panitumumab. Oxaliplatin was subsequently used in 55.9% (arm A) and 53.2% (arm B) of patients. Second-line therapy was administered for a median duration of 5.0 versus 3.2 months (P < .001) in study arm A versus B. Progression-free (6.5 v 4.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.85; P < .001) and overall survival (16.3 v 13.2 months; hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.88; P = .0021) from start of second-line therapy were longer in patients in arm A compared with arm B. Conclusion Our data suggest that the sequence of drug application might be more important than exposure to single agents. In patients with RAS wild-type tumors, first-line application of anti–epidermal growth factor receptor–directed therapy may represent a favorable condition for promoting effective subsequent therapy including antiangiogenic agents.
Published: 2015

48. Costs of treatment of colorectal cancer in different settings in Germany

Author: Martina Stauch, Klaus Hieke, Axel Grothey, and Ulrich R. Kleeberg
Subjects: Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic, medicine.medical_specialty, Time Factors, Colorectal cancer, Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous), Leucovorin, MEDLINE, Administration, Oral, Pharmacy, Deoxycytidine, Hospitals, University, Capecitabine, Germany, Outpatients, Humans, Medicine, Hospitals, Municipal, Intensive care medicine, health care economics and organizations, Inpatients, Health economics, business.industry, Health Policy, Treatment Setting, medicine.disease, Regimen, Emergency medicine, Costs and Cost Analysis, Fluorouracil, Colorectal Neoplasms, business, medicine.drug, Mayo Clinic Regimen
Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost implications of different settings (inpatient, outpatient/day clinic, or office-based oncologists) for the administration of standard fluoropyrimidine therapies, i.e., Mayo Clinic and Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO)/Ardalan regimen, and to compare the results with the cost of oral capecitabine in Germany. In total, 89 quarterly fee-listings from 26 patients provided by 5 office-based oncologists were analyzed. Physician's services, drug costs, pharmacy costs, and costs for implantable venous port systems and single-use pumps were considered. Findings were transferred to the hospital setting. A third-party payer perspective was applied. Quarterly treatment costs for the Mayo Clinic regimen varied betweeneuro2,036 andeuro10,569, and betweeneuro1,294 andeuro10,179 for the AIO/Ardalan regimen depending on the treatment setting. Projected costs for capecitabine wereeuro2,338. No hospitalization was considered to be necessary for capecitabine due to its oral administration route. The most expensive treatment options were the AIO/Ardalan protocol in the office-based setting and the Mayo Clinic protocol in the hospital setting. Capecitabine emerged as the cheapest option in the office-based setting. Overall, the cheapest option was the AIO/Ardalan protocol in municipal hospitals. However, municipal hospitals are unlikely to cover their costs in this situation. Substantial cost savings without incurring losses to providers may be realized if patients are transferred from the hospital setting to the office-based setting and treated with capecitabine.
Published: 2004
Full Text: View/download PDF

49. Bendamustine plus rituximab (B-R) versus CHOP plus rituximab (CHOP-R) as first-line treatment in patients with indolent lymphomas: Nine-year updated results from the StiL NHL1 study

Author: Heinz Dürk, Georg Maschmeyer, Harald Ballo, Manfred Welslau, Eckhart Weidmann, Christina Balser, Ulrich Kaiser, Christoph Losem, Alexander Burchardt, Wolfram Brugger, Gerhard Heil, Frank Kauff, Ulrich von Gruenhagen, Wolfgang Blau, Martina Stauch, Andrea Heider, Mathias J. Rummel, Arnold Ganser, and Juergen Barth
Subjects: Bendamustine, Oncology, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, business.industry, CHOP, medicine.disease, Surgery, First line treatment, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, hemic and lymphatic diseases, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Internal medicine, medicine, Clinical endpoint, Rituximab, Mantle cell lymphoma, In patient, Indolent lymphomas, business, 030215 immunology, medicine.drug
Abstract: 7501 Background: This multicenter, randomized, phase III study compared B-R and CHOP-R as first-line treatment in patients (pts) with indolent lymphomas or mantle cell lymphoma and was first published in The Lancet in 2013. The final analysis demonstrated a significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in the B-R group compared to the CHOP-R group, with a median PFS of 69.5 vs. 31.2 months, respectively. In the current analysis, we present updated results for overall survival (OS), time-to-next-treatment (TTNT), and secondary malignancies (sNPL) with a median follow-up of 113 months for patients with indolent lymphomas (excluding MCL). Methods: 447 pts with indolent lymphomas were randomized to receive B-R or CHOP-R for a maximum of 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints included OS, TTNT, and sNPL. Results: Patient characteristics were well balanced between arms; median age was 64 years. The difference in OS between the two treatment arms was not statistically significant, with 60 deaths in the B-R group vs 68 deaths with CHOP-R (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.58 – 1.15, p = 0.249). The estimated 10-year survival rates were 71% for B-R and 66% for CHOP-R. TTNT was significantly prolonged with B-R compared with CHOP-R (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38 – 0.69, p < 0.001). Median TTNT was not yet reached in the B-R group (95% CI 124.9 – n.y.r) vs. 56 months in the CHOP-R group (95% CI 39.1 – 82.0). Patients treated initially with B-R needed fewer second-line treatments due to disease progression compared to CHOP-R treated pts: 73 pts (34%) in the B-R group received salvage treatment compared with 106 pts (52%) in the CHOP-R group. For B-R pts, CHOP-R was used as second-line therapy 26 times (36%), whereas B-R was used for pts initially treated with CHOP-R 49 times (46%). 36 pts with sNPL were observed in the B-R group compared with 39 in the CHOP-R group, with 7 hematological malignancies in both groups to date. Conclusions: In pts with previously untreated indolent lymphomas, B-R demonstrates a PFS and TTNT benefit over CHOP-R. Clinical trial information: NCT00991211.
Published: 2017
Full Text: View/download PDF

50. Primary tumor location and efficacy of second-line therapy after initial treatment with FOLFIRI in combination with cetuximab or bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer- FIRE-3 (AIOKRK0306)

Author: Clemens Giessen-Jung, Martina Stauch, Alexander Kiani, Thomas Decker, Volker Heinemann, Sebastian Stintzing, Werner Scheithauer, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran, Frank Kullmann, Ursula Vehling-Kaiser, Dominik Paul Modest, Thomas Kirchner, G. Seipelt, Tobias Heintges, Christoph Kahl, Andreas Jung, Swantje Held, and Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal
Subjects: Oncology, Cancer Research, medicine.medical_specialty, Second-line therapy, Cetuximab, Bevacizumab, Colorectal cancer, business.industry, medicine.disease_cause, medicine.disease, Primary tumor, 03 medical and health sciences, 0302 clinical medicine, 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis, Internal medicine, medicine, FOLFIRI, Initial treatment, 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology, KRAS, business, medicine.drug
Abstract: 3525 Background: FIRE3 compared 1st-line therapy with FOLFIRI plus either cetuximab (arm A) or bevacizumab (arm B) in 592 patients (pts) with KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Second-line therapies appeared more successful in arm A compared to arm B. The impact of primary tumor location on this observation is unclear. Methods: Pts. were stratified for primary tumor site (left- vs. right-sided). Duration of 2nd-line therapy was calculated as time from first to last application. Progression-free survival (PFS2nd) and overall survival (OS2nd) of second-line therapy) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log rank test as well as Cox regression. All analyses were performed in the RAS wild-type population of the trial and reported according to drug sequences. Results: 272 of 400 pts. (68%) received 2nd-line therapy, of those 206 (109 in arm A, 97 in arm B) pts. presented left-sided, whereas 66 (26 in arm A, 40 in arm B) pts. presented right-sided primaries. PFS2nd was markedly longer in pts. with left-sided as compared to right-sided primary tumors (6.0 (95% CI: 5.5-6.7) vs. 3.4 (95% CI: 3.0-5.8) months, hazard ratio (HR): 0.64 (95% CI: 0.47-0.87), P = 0.005). Differences in PFS2nd between study-arms were evident in pts. with left-sided primaries (arm A: 7.3 (95% CI: 6.4-7.7) vs. arm B: 5.3 (95% CI: 4.3-5.9) months, HR: 0.61 (95% CI: 0.44-0.84), P = 0.002), but not in pts. with right-sided primaries (arm A: 4.0 (95% CI: 3.0-6.3) vs. arm B: 3.3 (95% CI: 2.6-5.8) months, HR: 1.09 (95% CI: 0.62-1.90). Consistent observations were also made for treatment duration and OS2nd. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis indicates that treatment duration and efficacy of second-line therapy are associated with primary tumor location. Efficacy of second-line therapy was significantly greater in pts. with left-sided tumors as compared to right sided tumors. This difference was driven by superior activity of second-line regimens of arm A compared to arm B in left-sided tumors. Our observations confirm the strong prognostic value of primary tumor location in mCRC across treatment lines. Clinical trial information: NCT00433927.
Published: 2017
Full Text: View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources

See catalog results

Searchworks

Select search scope, currently: Articles Catalog books, media & more in Jio Institute collections Articles journal articles & other e-resources

Search

Search Constraints

Refine your results

Search Limiters

Topic

Publication Year Range

Language

Publication Type

Journal

Database

Publisher

103 results on '"Martina Stauch"'

Search Results

Catalog

Select search scope, currently: Articles

Catalog

books, media & more in Jio Institute collections

Articles

journal articles & other e-resources