Search

To date, the few studies of associations between a functional polymorphism in the oxidative stress-related gene manganese superoxide dismutase (SOD2) and breast cancer survival have been inconsistent. In a homogeneous patient population from a large cooperative group trial Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) 8897, we evaluated this polymorphism in relation to both treatment-related toxicity and disease-free survival (DFS). Among 458 women who received cyclophosphamide-containing adjuvant chemotherapy, those with variant C alleles, related to higher antioxidant activity, experienced less grade 3-4 neutropenia (OR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.29-0.92) but had worse DFS (HR = 1.59, 95% CI = 0.99-2.55) than women with TT genotypes. No associations were observed among 874 women who were followed without adjuvant therapy. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that women with higher SOD2 antioxidant activity may experience less treatment-related toxicity but shorter time to disease recurrence or death after breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy, supporting the modifying effects of oxidative stress-related enzymes on cancer treatment toxicity and efficacy.

Purpose: Numerous chemotherapeutic agents are cytotoxic through generation of reactive species, and variability in genes related to oxidative stress may influence disease-free survival (DFS). We examined relationships between DFS and variants in NOS3, as well as NQO1, NQO2, and CBR3, among treated and untreated breast cancer patients in a Southwest Oncology Group clinical trial (S8897). Experimental Design: In the parent trial, women were assigned according to prognostic features; the high-risk group was randomized to cyclophosphamide, i.v. methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil or to cyclophosphamide, i.v. doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil ± tamoxifen, and the low-risk group did not receive adjuvant therapy. We extracted DNA from normal lymph node tissue and examined functional polymorphisms in NOS3, NQO1, NQO2, and CBR3, in relation to DFS, using Cox proportional hazard model. Results: There were significant interactions between DFS, adjuvant therapy, and NOS3 Glu298Asp and −786 polymorphisms, alone and in combination (P for interaction = 0.008). When NOS3 genotypes were combined, women with genotypes encoding for lower nitric oxide who received chemotherapy had a >2-fold increase in hazard of progression (hazard ratio, 2.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-4.25), whereas there was reduced risk for those who did not receive adjuvant therapy (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.19-0.95). There were no associations between the other genotypes and DFS in either group. Conclusion: Variants encoding lower activity of NOS3 may affect outcomes in breast cancer patients, with the direction of risk differing depending on chemotherapy status. These results may mirror the known dual functions of nitric oxide and nitric oxide synthase, depending on oxidative environment. (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(16):5258–66) (Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(16):5258–)

The levels for serum protein bound neutral carbohydrates (fucose, mannose, and galactose) were determined at specific intervals for 40 patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung and compared to the corresponding carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. In pretreatment samples, the frequency of elevation was 92.5% for fucose and 77.5% each for mannose and for galactose. CEA determined in these same samples was elevated (greater than 5 ng/ml) in 45.0%. One or more of the three carbohydrate levels were elevated in pretreatment serum of 95.0% of the patients. The individual frequency of elevation for each carbohydrate was significantly related to initial stage of disease (P less than 0.01). Median survival was significantly longer for patients based on a discriminant of less than 3 carbohydrates elevated in pretreatment samples (25 months) to all 3 elevated (11 months) with P = 0.0302. A single value, termed the biomarker index, was calculated to represent the summation of the individual carbohydrate levels per individual serum sample. The biomarker index was found to be directly correlated with extent of primary disease, number of metastic sites, tumor burden, and clinical response categories assessed at serial time points. For patients with both low Biomarker Index values and normal CEA levels in pretreatment samples, an initial rise in both determinations occurred frequently corresponding to partial or complete tumor response. The occurrence of such discordant results must be considered as a likely possibility for those patients with low or normal pretreatment biological marker levels and subsequent response to primary chemotherapy.

Purpose We evaluated the efficacy of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) versus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF) in node-negative breast cancer patients with and without tamoxifen (TAM), overall and by hormone receptor (HR) status. Patients and Methods Node-negative patients identified by tumor size (> 2 cm), negative HR, or high S-phase fraction (n = 2,690) were randomly assigned to CMF, CAF, CMF + TAM (CMFT), or CAF + TAM (CAFT). Cox regression evaluated overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for CAF versus CMF and TAM versus no TAM separately. Two-sided CIs and one-sided P values for planned comparisons were calculated. Results Ten-year estimates indicated that CAF was not significantly better than CMF (P = .13) for the primary outcome of DFS (77% v 75%; HR = 1.09; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.27). CAF had slightly better OS than CMF (85% v 82%, HR = 1.19 for CMF v CAF; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.43); values were statistically significant in the planned one-sided test (P = .03). Toxicity was greater with CAF and did not increase with TAM. Overall, TAM had no benefit (DFS, P = .16; OS, P = .37), but the TAM effect differed by HR groups. For HR-positive patients, TAM was beneficial (DFS, HR = 1.32 for no TAM v TAM; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.61; P = .003; OS, HR = 1.26; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.61; P = .03), but not for HR-negative patients (DFS, HR = 0.81 for no TAM v TAM; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.03; OS, HR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.60 to 1.05). Conclusion CAF did not improve DFS compared with CMF; there was a slight effect on OS. Given greater toxicity, we cannot conclude CAF to be superior to CMF. TAM is effective in HR-positive disease, but not in HR-negative disease.

Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) is a transcription factor that regulates gene expression in critical pathways involved in tumor growth and metastases. In this report, we investigated whether the level of HIF-1 alpha is increased during carcinogenesis in breast tissue and is associated with other tumor biomarkers.Paraffin-embedded clinical specimens from five pathologic stages of breast tumorigenesis and from normal breast tissue were used. HIF-1 alpha protein and the biomarkers vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), HER-2/neu, p53, Ki-67, and estrogen receptor (ER) were identified immunohistochemically, and microvessel density (a measure of angiogenesis) was determined. Associations among levels of HIF-1 alpha and these biomarkers were tested statistically. All statistical tests are two-sided.The frequency of HIF-1 alpha-positive cells in a specimen increased with the specimen's pathologic stage (P.001, chi(2) test for trend) as follows: normal breast tissue (0 specimens withor = 1% HIF-1 alpha-positive cells in 10 specimens tested), ductal hyperplastic lesions (0 in 10), well-differentiated ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS) (11 in 20), well-differentiated invasive breast cancers (12 in 20), poorly differentiated DCIS (17 in 20), and poorly differentiated invasive carcinomas (20 in 20). Increased levels of HIF-1 alpha were statistically significantly associated with high proliferation and increased expression of VEGF and ER proteins. In DCIS lesions, increased levels of HIF-1 alpha were statistically significantly associated with increased microvessel density. HIF-1alpha showed a borderline association with HER-2/neu but no association with p53.The level of HIF-1 alpha increases as the pathologic stage increases and is higher in poorly differentiated lesions than in the corresponding type of well-differentiated lesions. Increased levels of HIF-1 alpha are associated with increased proliferation and increased expression of ER and VEGF. Thus, increased levels of HIF-1 alpha are potentially associated with more aggressive tumors.

BACKGROUND Cisplatin has minimal antitumor activity when used as second- or third-line treatment of metastatic breast carcinoma. Older reports suggest an objective response rate of 8% when 60–120 mg/m2 of cisplatin is administered every 3–4 weeks. Although a dose–response effect has been observed with cisplatin, the dose-limiting toxicities associated with cisplatin (e.g., nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and neurotoxicity) have limited its use as a treatment for breast carcinoma. WR-2721 or amifostine initially was developed to protect military personnel in the event of nuclear war. Amifostine subsequently was shown to protect normal tissues from the toxic effects of alkylating agents and cisplatin without decreasing the antitumor effect of the chemotherapy. Early trials of cisplatin and amifostine also suggested that the incidence and severity of cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and neuropathy were reduced. METHODS A Phase II study of the combination of cisplatin plus amifostine was conducted in patients with progressive metastatic breast carcinoma who had received one, but not more than one, chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease. Patients received amifostine, 910 mg/m2 intravenously over 15 minutes. After completion of the amifostine infusion, cisplatin 120 mg/m2 was administered over 30 minutes. Intravenous hydration and mannitol was administered before and after cisplatin. Treatment was administered every 3 weeks until disease progression. RESULTS Forty-four patients were enrolled in the study of which 7 (16%) were ineligible. A median of 2 cycles of therapy was administered to the 37 eligible patients. Six partial responses were observed for an overall response rate of 16%. Most patients (57%) stopped treatment because of disease progression. Neurologic toxicity was reported in 52% of patients. Seven different life-threatening toxicities were observed in patients while receiving treatment. CONCLUSIONS The combination of cisplatin and amifostine in this study resulted in an overall response rate of 16%. Neither a tumor-protective effect nor reduced toxicity to normal tissues was observed with the addition of amifostine to cisplatin in this trial. Cancer 2001;92:2517–22. © 2001 American Cancer Society.

Purpose: The present study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of a cisplatin and 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) combination in previously treated advanced breast cancer. Methods: Thirty‐six women with recurrent metastatic breast cancer were entered on a phase II study of 5‐FU 1000 mg/m2/day given intravenously as a continuous infusion on days 1–3 and cisplatin 30 mg/m2/day given intravenously over 1 h on days 2–4, repeated every 21 days. All subjects had received one previous chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease and either progressed during treatment or relapsed after responding to previous chemotherapy. Fourteen patients had also received previous adjuvant chemotherapy, 17 patients had previous radiation therapy, and 29 patients had previous hormonal therapy. Results: Among 32 response‐evaluable patients, there were 10 partial remissions (31%) and 1 complete remission (3%), with an overall objective response rate of 34%. Median duration of response was 4 months. Median survival was 10.5 months for responders and 9.5 months for the entire group. Toxicity was mild to moderate in most patients. Overall twelve patients experienced grade 3 toxicity (10 hematologic, 1 mucositis, and 2 nausea). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Conclusion: Infusional cisplatin and 5‐FU is a well tolerated and active regimen in women with previously treated advanced breast cancer.

In the last three decades, there has been a gradual, though significant change in the treatment of early stage breast cancer. For almost a century, physicians advocated an "anatomical view" of the dissemination of this disease, which justified a more radical and mutilating treatment strategy. Finally in the mid-1970s, results from large randomized trials began to show that either mastectomy or lumpectomy with radiation therapy were appropriate treatment for women with early stage disease. These results suggested that breast cancer can actually be a systemic disease ("biological view") even in early stages. This hypothesis was confirmed when large randomized clinical trials demonstrated the effectiveness of adjuvant systemic therapy in controlling micrometastatic disease in women with node-positive and node negative disease. As we approach the end of this century, most patients with early stage disease will be offered some form of adjuvant systemic therapy, before or after local treatment with surgery, with or without local radiation therapy. There has been a lot of interest on the proper sequence of the therapeutic modalities, in particular with the recent publication of larger randomized trials of primary systemic therapy. This specific topic is discussed elsewhere in this issue by Singletary.

BACKGROUND A Phase II study was performed evaluating the disease free and overall survival rates associated with a dose-intensive, 16-week, doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimen in women with breast carcinoma and ≥ 10 involved axillary lymph nodes. METHODS Eligible patients underwent staging with computed tomography and bone scanning and were treated with a 16-week, dose-intensive chemotherapy regimen, comprised of 8 2-week courses of cyclophosphamide, 100 mg/m2 orally, on Days 1–7; doxorubicin, 40 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.), on Day 1; methotrexate, 100 mg/m2 i.v., on Day 1 with leucovorin rescue, 10 mg/m2, every 6 hours for 6 doses orally on Day 2; vincristine, 1 mg i.v. on Day 1; 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 600 mg/m2 i.v., on Day 2 over 2 hours; and 5-FU, 300 mg/m2/day continuous i.v. on Days 8 and 9. Tamoxifen, 20 mg daily, was administered to patients with estrogen receptor positive tumors treated after October 1988. All patients were offered locoregional radiation therapy. RESULTS Sixty-four women were treated on protocol. The median follow-up of 27 surviving patients was > 8 years at last follow-up. Three patients were lost to follow-up. The median time to progression was 54 months, the Kaplan–Meier estimate of event free survival at 5 years was 44% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31–56%), and the Kaplan–Meier estimate of overall survival at 5 years was 57% (95% CI, 44–69%). At 98 months the Kaplan–Meier estimate of freedom from recurrence was 31% (95% CI, 19–43%) and the Kaplan–Meier estimate of survival at 111 months was 36% (95% CI, 23–49%). CONCLUSIONS Despite the use of dose-intensive, doxorubicin-based, adjuvant chemotherapy, and intensive staging prior to study entry, the results of the current study are similar to those of previous reports for standard dose chemotherapy and appear inferior to those reported for high dose therapy. Cancer 1999;85:899–904. © 1999 American Cancer Society.

PURPOSE The Intergroup conducted this breast cancer adjuvant trial to compare an investigational 16-week regimen with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (5-FU; CAF). The 16-week regimen features greater doxorubicin and 5-FU dose-intensity than CAF and improved scheduling of antimetabolites with sequential methotrexate and 5-FU, as well as infusion 5-FU. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 646 node-positive, receptor-negative patients were randomly assigned to receive either the 1 6-week regimen or six cycles of CAF. Breast cancer outcomes included recurrence as well as disease-free and overall survival. Toxicity was evaluated by the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC). Treatment-related quality of life was assessed by the Breast Chemotherapy Questionnaire (BCQ) before, during, and 4 months after treatment in 163 patients. The trial was designed to use one-sided tests of significance for power calculations, but is now reported with both one-sided and the traditional two-sided tests of significance. RESULTS At a median follow-up of 3.9 years, the estimated 4-year recurrence-free survival rate was 67.5% with the 16-week regimen versus 62.7% with CAF (P = .19, two-sided; P = .095, one-sided). The estimated 4-year survival rate was 78.1% with the 16-week regimen versus 71.4% with CAF (P = .10, two-sided; P = .05, one-sided). CAF produced significantly higher grades of leukopenia, granulocytopenia, and thrombocytopenia, as well as liver and cardiac toxicity, whereas the 16-week regimen produced significantly higher grades of anemia, nausea, stomatitis, and weight loss, as well as skin and neurotoxicity. There were three treatment-related deaths with CAF but none with the 16-week regimen. During treatment, quality of life declined significantly more with the 16-week regimen than CAF, but by 4 months posttreatment, there was no difference. CONCLUSION The 16-week regimen produced marginally better breast cancer outcomes than CAF with similar toxicity but a greater reduction in during-treatment quality of life. The 16-week regimen should not be used instead of a standard-dose regimen without careful consideration of the 16-week regimen's pros and cons, which include its complicated schedule. It should probably not be tested further, but its antimetabolite schedules and frequent drug administration (ie, dose density) should be considered in the development of new regimens.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in older women diagnosed with lowrisk, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer still inspires controversy. In fact, there is very little information on polychemotherapy in women aged 70 years or older (1), a direct result of our long-standing failure as cancer investigators to recruit older women to clinical trials. In this issue of the Journal, the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) presents the results of the IBCSG Trial IX (2). Between 1988 and 1999, 1669 postmenopausal women with lymph node-negative breast cancer were stratified by ER status and randomly assigned to receive either 5 years of tamoxifen alone or three cycles of “classical” CMF (oral cyclophosphamide on days 1–14 plus intravenous methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil on days 1 and 8, repeated every 28 days), followed by 5 years of tamoxifen. An interesting feature of this tamoxifen-based trial is that patients with ERnegative disease continued to be enrolled until the most recent publication of the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) tamoxifen overview in 1998 (3). This design de facto created two studies within the same trial: one study examining the role of CMF followed by tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone in 1217 postmenopausal women with lymph node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer and a second study comparing the same regimens in 382 postmenopausal women with lymph node-negative, ER-negative breast cancer. The results indicate no benefit from the addition of chemotherapy to tamoxifen in the larger ER-positive stratum but show a statistically significant and meaningful survival benefit in the smaller ER-negative stratum. The IBCSG findings in lymph node-negative, ER-positive patients must be viewed in the context of two other important pieces of evidence: the 1995 EBCTCG overview of polychemotherapy for early breast cancer (1) and the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-20 trial (4), which enrolled 2306 preand postmenopausal lymph nodenegative, ER-positive breast cancer patients. These patients received 5 years of tamoxifen alone versus six cycles (rather than three cycles) of classical CMF or MF with concurrent initiation of 5 years of tamoxifen. The 1995 overview included data from 18 000 women in 47 trials of prolonged chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy. This overview analysis showed an overall benefit from the addition of 3–6 months of polychemotherapy to tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone with statistically significant reductions in the annual odds of recurrence (19% ± 3% [mean ± standard deviation]) and death (11% ± 4%) (1). Within each age category, the proportional risk reduction with polychemotherapy was the same with or without adjuvant tamoxifen, but the 1995 overview indicated a greater proportional risk reduction with polychemotherapy that favored younger women over older women (1). In contrast, the proportional risk reduction in the annual odds of recurrence (47% ± 3%) and death (26% ± 4%) observed with 5 years of tamoxifen was not affected by age (3). A limitation of these data is that three of the largest trials ever conducted on the role of chemotherapy when added to tamoxifen had been activated shortly before 1990 and, therefore, were not included in the 1995 overview. These trials were IBCSG IX (1669 postmenopausal patients) and NSABP B-20 (2306 preand postmenopausal patients) in lymph node-negative disease and Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) 8814/Intergroup Trial (INT) 0100 (1477 postmenopausal patients) in lymph node-positive disease (5). The IBCSG IX trial recruited 1217 patients with ER-positive disease. These patients were all likely to be postmenopausal because of a more detailed (and more precise) definition of menopause that took into account age and history of amenorrhea compared with the age criteria used by the NSABP. In fact, as noted by the IBCSG IX investigators, it is possible that some (or many) of the 358 women aged 50–54 years among the 1264 women enrolled in the aged-50-years-or-older stratum of NSABP B-20 were perior premenopausal at study entry. This is a group in which at least some of the benefit obtained with cytotoxic chemotherapy could be compounded by its temporary or permanent ovarian suppression effect, which could add to the antiestrogen effects of tamoxifen in premenopausal women. The accrual figures further substantiate the claim from the IBCSG IX investigators that this is the largest trial examining the role of chemotherapy followed by tamoxifen in a lymph node-negative, postmenopausal population, even if only the ER-positive stratum is considered. Its sample size allowed a statistical design with 80% power to detect a 33% relative reduction in relapse risk in the ER-positive stratum and a 50% relative reduction in the ER-negative stratum. The 5-year results are quite clear: At this time, there is no observed benefit from the addition of CMF followed by tamoxifen in the larger ER-positive stratum for either disease-free survival (DFS; relative risk [RR] 0.99, 95%

Background. Locoregional recurrences occur commonly in women with breast cancer and often have grave prognostic implications. Major controversies exist concerning the prophylaxis, implications, and treatment of such relapses and are the focus of this review. Methods. The relevant medical literature was reviewed and analyzed. Results. Locoregional recurrences may be prevented by postoperative radiation therapy; however, this has little impact on survival. Postoperative systemic therapy prevents locoregional relapse, but less efficiently than radiation therapy. When these modalities are combined, radiation therapy often is delayed until after several cycles of chemotherapy. Optimal sequencing remains controversial. Most patients with locoregional relapses have an exceedingly poor outlook. Radiation therapy provides excellent local control; however, the addition of combination chemotherapy should be considered for patients with defined poor prognostic features. The clinical impact of recurrence in the breast after breast-conserving primary treatment now is emerging. Such local relapses do not have the dreaded prognostic implications of locoregional relapse after mastectomy, but are a marker for an increased risk of dissemination. Standard therapy in this setting remains mastectomy. Additional breast-conserving surgery may be considered in the context of clinical trials for patients with certain favorable features. Conversely, some local relapses after breast-conserving surgery have a poorer prognosis, and the addition of adjuvant systemic therapy should be considered in addition to mastectomy. Conclusions. The heterogenous nature of locoregional relapses has made it difficult to conduct prospective randomized clinical trials. However, many retrospective data exist, making it possible to recommend rational treatment approaches for these patients.

Purpose: There are no established genetic markers for prediction of outcomes after cyclophosphamide (CP)-containing adjuvant therapy for breast cancer. In an ancillary study to a SWOG (Southwest Oncology Group) trial (S8897), we investigated functional polymorphisms in 4 genes in CP pharmacokinetic pathways in relation to hematologic toxicity and disease-free survival (DFS). Experimental Design: Germline DNA was available from 458 women who were at high risk of relapse and was randomized to CAF (CP, intravenous doxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil) versus CMF (CP, intravenous methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil) ± tamoxifen, and from 874 women who had a presumed favorable prognosis and did not receive adjuvant therapy. Odds ratios for grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicity in the treated group and hazard ratios for DFS associated with selected functional polymorphisms in CYP2B6CYP3A4GSTA1and GSTP1were estimated by logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard regression. Results: Compared with women with AA genotypes, those with at least 1 GSTP1 variant G allele had reduced risk of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia [odds ratios (OR) = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.41–0.97] and leucopenia (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.39–0.89). No other associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms and toxicity or survival were found in the treated or untreated group. Conclusion: Known genetic variants in genes involved in CP pharmacokinetics may not have major effects on DFS in breast cancer patients. The lower risk of developing high-grade hematologic toxicity among women with variant GSTP1alleles suggests that genetic markers in combination with clinical factors may be useful in defining a subgroup of women who are less susceptible to adverse hematologic toxicities with CP-containing therapies.

BACKGROUND Studies have shown that response to a given chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer is superior to that in patients previously treated with other regimens. This finding raises the question of whether it is necessary and ethical to study the effects of new anticancer agents in untreated patients. Such studies appear to be the best test for drug development, but there has been no evaluation of whether survival of untreated patients, whose cancer is sensitive to established drugs, is adversely affected in trials of new drugs. PURPOSE This randomized study of untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer was designed (a) to compare the survival of patients treated with either effective standard chemotherapy or an investigational anticancer drug as initial therapy and (b) to evaluate response rates and toxic effects of such therapies. METHODS Eighty-six patients were randomly assigned to receive, as initial therapy, either the standard CAV regimen--cyclophosphamide (1000 mg/m2), doxorubicin (50 mg/m2), and vincristine (1.4 mg/m2) every 3 weeks--or the phase II drug menogaril (200 mg/m2) every 4 weeks. Treatment after induction therapy varied, depending on patient response, but nonresponders and those with disease progression received salvage chemotherapy--etoposide (120 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, and 3) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 1), repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS Of the 43 patients on CAV, 42% responded (eight complete responses and 10 partial responses); 5% of the 43 on menogaril responded (two partial responses) (P = .0001). Twelve (22%) of 54 patients responded to salvage chemotherapy (five complete responses and seven partial responses). Within 3 months from start of treatment, twelve patients died--3 patients in the CAV group and nine patients in the menogaril group (P = .12). The estimated median survival was 37 weeks with menogaril and 45 weeks with CAV (P = .28). At 6 months, survival was 76.7% for the CAV group and 67.4% for the menogaril group. At 12 months, survival rates were 24.4% and 27.9%, respectively. Confidence intervals (95%) for the differences between the proportions surviving in the two groups were -9%-28% at 6 months and -25%-14% at 12 months. Use of CAV resulted in significantly higher occurrence of severe and life-threatening treatment-related complications (P = .002). CONCLUSION The confidence intervals for the differences in survival are too wide to conclude that evaluation of a new drug in untreated patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer is or is not harmful. The data do suggest, however, that use of this study design may have no adverse effect on survival.

PURPOSE Amplification and/or overexpression of the HER-2/neu oncogene have been shown to correlate with poor clinical outcome in patients with axillary node-positive breast cancer. In contrast, the prognostic significance of HER-2/neu in node-negative disease is controversial. This study was undertaken to evaluate further the relationship between HER-2/neu and clinical outcome in node-negative disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS Overexpression of HER-2/neu was evaluated by permanent-section immunohistochemistry in tumors from 613 patients with long-term clinical follow-up enrolled in the Intergroup Study 0011. Patients were stratified into low-risk (n = 307) and high-risk (n = 306) groups on the basis of tumor size and estrogen-receptor (ER) status. Low-risk patients were defined as having small (less than 3 cm), ER-positive tumors and were observed without additional treatment after initial surgery. High-risk patients had either ER-negative or large (greater than or equal to 3 cm), ER-positive tumors and were randomized to be observed (n = 146) or to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 160) after surgery. RESULTS The rate of HER-2/neu overexpression was 14.3% in all tumors combined and was higher in invasive carcinomas with (21.5%) than without (11.2%) a significant noninvasive or in situ histologic component (P less than .0001). There was no relationship between overexpression and clinical outcome in the natural history setting of combined low-risk and high-risk patients not receiving adjuvant therapy (n = 453). Based on the reasoning that the influence of HER-2/neu may have been obscured by high-risk features and/or the presence of noninvasive carcinoma, we also analyzed the subset of patients with low-risk lesions not containing a significant in situ component (n = 179). Patients of this group with HER-2/neu-positive tumors showed only 40% disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years, compared with over 80% in patients with HER-2/neu-negative tumors (P less than .0001). A similar inverse correlation was observed between overexpression and overall survival in the same group of patients (P = .0001). In a separate analysis involving patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, those with HER-2/neu-negative tumors showed significantly improved DFS in response to therapy compared with patients with HER-2/neu-positive tumors. CONCLUSION Overexpression of HER-2/neu is associated with poor clinical outcome in a subset of node-negative patients with small, ER-positive, predominantly invasive tumors and may play a role in resistance to adjuvant chemotherapy.

Summary Background Tamoxifen is standard adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. We assessed the benefit of adding chemotherapy to adjuvant tamoxifen and whether tamoxifen should be given concurrently or after chemotherapy. Methods We undertook a phase 3, parallel, randomised trial (SWOG-8814, INT-0100) in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer to test two major objectives: whether the primary outcome, disease-free survival, was longer with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF) given every 4 weeks for six cycles plus 5 years of daily tamoxifen than with tamoxifen alone; and whether disease-free survival was longer with CAF followed by tamoxifen (CAF-T) than with CAF plus concurrent tamoxifen (CAFT). Overall survival and toxicity were predefined, important secondary outcomes for each objective. Patients in this open-label trial were randomly assigned by a computer algorithm in a 2:3:3 ratio (tamoxifen:CAF-T:CAFT) and analysis was by intention to treat of eligible patients. Groups were compared by stratified log-rank tests, followed by Cox regression analyses adjusted for significant prognostic factors. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00929591. Findings Of 1558 randomised women, 1477 (95%) were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. After a maximum of 13 years of follow-up (median 8·94 years), 637 women had a disease-free survival event (tamoxifen, 179 events in 361 patients; CAF-T, 216 events in 566 patients; CAFT, 242 events in 550 patients). For the first objective, therapy with the CAF plus tamoxifen groups combined (CAFT or CAF-T) was superior to tamoxifen alone for the primary endpoint of disease-free survival (adjusted Cox regression hazard ratio [HR] 0·76, 95% CI 0·64–0·91; p=0·002) but only marginally for the secondary endpoint of overall survival (HR 0·83, 0·68–1·01; p=0·057). For the second objective, the adjusted HRs favoured CAF-T over CAFT but did not reach significance for disease-free survival (HR 0·84, 0·70–1·01; p=0·061) or overall survival (HR 0·90, 0·73–1·10; p=0·30). Neutropenia, stomatitis, thromboembolism, congestive heart failure, and leukaemia were more frequent in the combined CAF plus tamoxifen groups than in the tamoxifen-alone group. Interpretation Chemotherapy with CAF plus tamoxifen given sequentially is more effective adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive, node-positive breast cancer than is tamoxifen alone. However, it might be possible to identify some subgroups that do not benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy despite positive nodes. Funding National Cancer Institute (US National Institutes of Health).

We assessed the toxicity and efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy consolidation with reinfusion of purged autologous bone marrow in women with metastatic breast cancer responding to a dose-intense outpatient regimen. Thirty women with hormone-unresponsive metastatic breast cancer, previously untreated with adjuvant doxorubicin or with any chemotherapy for metastatic disease, were treated with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, doxorubicin, fluorouracil, vincristine, and leucovorin for 16 weeks. Twenty-four patients responded to therapy; 8 showed a complete response, and 16 showed a partial response. These patients proceeded to the next phase of the protocol, ie, marrow harvest and treatment with 6000 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide and 800 mg/m2 thiotepa given over 4 days. Harvested marrow was purged with 100 micrograms/mL 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide, and all patients engrafted satisfactorily. The predominant side effects were myelosuppressive and gastrointestinal, and there were no deaths from toxic effects. Three of the 16 patients who showed a partial response after the outpatient phase of treatment achieved a complete response after high-dose therapy. The partial response seen in two more patients converted to a complete response at all sites except bone. The median time to disease progression for all patients in this study was 13 months, and the median survival was 22 months. Four of the original 30 patients remained without disease progression a median of 27 months from entry into the study. This study indicates that this dose-intense regimen can be safely administered, even with the use of purged marrow, with an acceptable toxicity profile. This approach results in a high response rate in women with metastatic breast cancer and could form the basis for a regimen to be tested in the high-risk adjuvant setting.

Patients frequently overestimate the benefit of standard breast cancer adjuvant therapy. This is due in part to vague doctor-patient communication. To examine how the doctor's description and patient's expectations of the benefit of standard therapy affect clinical trial participation, we randomized 282 female cancer patients to one of two versions of a clinical vignette describing a choice between standard cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (5FU) (CMF) and a randomized trial comparing CMF with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and 5FU (CAF). The vignettes differed only on whether results with CMF were described verbally or numerically in terms of disease-free survival (DFS). After selecting CMF or the trial, patients estimated their 10-year DFS with CMF. Patients were randomized 3:1 to the verbal vignette. The trial was selected by 110 of 210 (52.4%) verbal vignette patients versus 25 of 72 (34.7%) numeric vignette patients (P = .01). Estimates of 10-year DFS with CMF varied considerably; many were inaccurate. When patients in the verbal vignette group were divided into thirds according to DFS estimate, 22 of 64 (34.4%) in the top third selected the trial versus 38 of 64 (59.4%) and 38 of 65 (58.5%) in the middle and bottom third, respectively (P = .005). Younger age, college education, and previous participation in a trial also predicted trial selection. Multivariate logistic regression suggested that the benefit expected from CMF was more important than how benefit was described in treatment selection. Assuring realistic patient expectations of standard adjuvant therapy benefit is likely to be important during discussion of clinical trials.

Eighteen women with metastatic breast cancer previously untreated with chemotherapy were entered on a phase II trial of intravenous menogaril, a new anthracycline derivative. Treatment was given at 140 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of each 28 day cycle. The most common toxicities were leukopenia in all patients and burning and phlebitis at infusion sites in 72%. Serial assessment of cardiac function by resting and stress gated blood pool scans showed temporary decrements in ejection fraction in only 2 patients (11%). The response rate to the therapy was 19% [95% CI 0–38%] including 1 complete and 2 partial responses. The median time to relapse among responders was 6.5 months. Mean survival in all patients entered was 15.8 months from date of entry. Menogaril at this dose and schedule has modest activity as first line therapy for metastatic breast cancer but also has significant marrow and local toxicity.

Fifty-three women with breast cancer were treated with a new 16-week dose-intense, chemotherapy regimen. Patients with operable breast cancer with 10 or more histologically positive axillary nodes were treated with this five-drug regimen that incorporated the concepts of weekly chemotherapy, sequential administration of antimetabolites, and continuous infusion of fluorouracil (5-FU). The chemotherapy regimen consisted of eight cycles (each of 2 wk duration) of 100 mg of cyclophosphamide/m2 orally on days 1-7, 40 mg of doxorubicin/m2 intravenous (IV) on day 1, 100 mg of methotrexate/m2 IV on day 1 with 10 mg of leucovorin rescue/m2 every 6 hours for six oral doses on day 2, 1 mg of vincristine IV on day 1, and 600 mg of 5-FU/m2 IV at hour 20 over 2 hours. A continuous infusion of 300 mg of 5-FU/m2 per day was given IV on days 8-9 of each 2-week cycle. The doses and schedule of drug administration were designed to minimize dosage reduction and treatment delay. At a median follow-up of 17 months, there have been eight relapses in the 53 patients. The actuarial 3-year disease-free survival is 80% (95% confidence interval, 62% to 90%). The major side effects were attributable to myelosuppression. Absolute neutrophil counts less than 250/microL were noted in 12 (23%) patients; seven patients (13%) required hospitalization for management of neutropenic fever. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Ninety-four percent of the planned doses were administered, and only 5% of the courses were delayed because of toxic reactions. The encouraging therapeutic data, manageable side effects, and our ability to deliver over 90% of the planned doses provide the rationale for a phase III comparison of this new dose-intense regimen and standard chemotherapy in patients with operable disease and positive axillary nodes.

Patients with Hodgkin's disease who have failed two or more chemotherapy regimens or who have relapsed after an initial chemotherapy-induced remission of less than 12 months are seldom cured with conventional salvage therapies. We studied the effect of high-dose cytoreductive therapy followed by bone marrow transplantation in 50 such patients with relapsed Hodgkin's disease. Twenty-one patients with histocompatibility locus antigen (HLA)-matched donors had allogeneic marrow transplants, one patient received marrow from an identical twin, and 28 patients without a matched donor received autologous grafts purged with 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide. Busulfan plus cyclophosphamide was the preparative regimen for the 25 patients who had received extensive prior irradiation, and the other 25 patients received cyclophosphamide plus total body irradiation. The overall actuarial probability of event-free survival at 3 years was 30%, with a median follow-up of 26 months. The event-free survival following transplantation was influenced by the number of chemotherapy failures and the patient's response to conventional salvage therapy prior to transplant. The 16 patients who were transplanted at first relapse, while still responsive to standard therapy, had a 64% actuarial probability of event-free survival at 3 years. Age, presence of extranodal disease, preparative regimen, and type of graft (autologous v allogeneic) were not significant prognostic factors. The majority of transplant-related deaths were from interstitial pneumonitis; inadequate pulmonary function, multiple prior chemotherapy regimens, and prior chest irradiation all appeared to increase the transplant-related mortality. These results suggest a role for marrow transplantation in a subset of patients with relapsed Hodgkin's disease who are unlikely to be otherwise cured but are still responsive to conventional-dose cytoreductive therapy.

Past attempts to subclassify small-cell lung cancer (SCCL) histology (oat cell, fusiform, polygonal, intermediate, etc) have not been useful because of interrater variability and a lack of clinical significance. A review of outcome in a previous series suggested that a different histologic subtype, small-cell/large-cell (SC/LC) conferred an inferior response and survival analogous to the relative chemotherapy and radiation resistance seen in the variant-morphology (SC/LC) cultured cell lines. To evaluate the clinical impact of SC/LC we applied the proposed International Association for the study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) histology subclassification that incorporates the SC/LC category for patients with extensive-disease SCCL entering Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) protocol 1582. All cases were reviewed for eligibility by one pathologist, and all possible SC/LC (variant) plus 10% of all cases were reviewed together with a second pathologist; 577 of the 628 patients who entered were eligible, of whom 550 had histologic material submitted for review and are considered for this analysis. Initial review disclosed 24 cases with SC/LC (4.4%) and 526 with "classic" histology. The second review showed 100% agreement for classic form, but only 11 SC/LC cases with concordance between the reviewing pathologists. Eight of 24 (33%) cases from first review and three of 11 (27%) with concordance on second review achieved complete response (CR) compared with 101 of 526 (19%) for "classic" SCCL (P = .11 and .45, respectively, for the first and second review groups).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Purpose Chemotherapy, tamoxifen, and ovarian ablation/suppression (OA/OS) are effective adjuvant approaches for premenopausal, steroid hormone receptor–positive breast cancer. The value of combined therapy has not been clearly established. Patients and Methods Premenopausal women with axillary lymph node–positive, steroid hormone receptor–positive breast cancer (1,503 eligible patients) were randomly assigned to six cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF), CAF followed by 5 years of monthly goserelin (CAF-Z), or CAF followed by 5 years of monthly goserelin and daily tamoxifen (CAF-ZT). The primary end points were time to recurrence (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) for CAF-Z versus CAF, and CAF-ZT versus CAF-Z. Results With a median follow-up of 9.6 years, the addition of tamoxifen to CAF-Z improved TTR and DFS but not OS. There was no overall advantage for addition of goserelin to CAF. Conclusion Addition of tamoxifen to CAF-Z improves outcome for premenopausal node-positive, receptor-positive breast cancer. The role of OA/OS alone or with other endocrine agents should be studied more intensely.

PURPOSE: Although hormonal therapy represents standard therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive disease, many patients receive initial chemotherapy because of the location, bulk, or aggressiveness of their disease. It is uncertain whether simultaneous hormonal therapy provides additional benefit compared with chemotherapy alone. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial E3186 was initiated to explore this question. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1988 and December 1992, 231 patients with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive or ER-unknown metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive either chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil [CAF]) or chemohormonal therapy (CAF plus tamoxifen and Halotestin [fluoxymesterone; Pharmacia-Upjohn, Kalamazoo, MI] [CAFTH]) as front-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer. Patients who experienced a complete response to induction therapy either received or did not receive maintenance cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, prednisone, and TH as a secondary randomization. RESULTS: The response rates (complete response and partial response) of patients who received CAF and CAFTH were similar (69.2% v 68.9%, respectively; P = .99). Time to treatment failure (TTF) was slightly longer for patients who received chemohormonal therapy compared with chemotherapy alone patients (13.4 months v 10.3 months, respectively; P = .087), and TTF was significantly longer in ER-positive compared with ER-negative patients (17.4 months v 10.3 months, respectively; P = .048). However, ER status had no effect on overall survival (30.0 months for CAF v 29.3 months for CAFTH). CONCLUSION: In patients with potentially hormone-sensitive metastatic breast cancer, chemohormonal therapy prolongs TTF for ER-positive patients without improving overall survival.

Fifty-four evaluable patients with SCLC previously treated with chemotherapy received either N-methylformamide or spirogermanium. There was one partial response to N-methylformamide. The median survival times for patients treated with N-MF and spirogermanium were 11.7 and 12.6 weeks respectively. Five patients treated with N-MF experienced severe toxicity while four patients treated with spirogermanium experienced severe and life-threatening toxicity.

PURPOSE To investigate the value of maintenance treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer whose disease is in complete remission (CR). PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred ninety-five women (141 eligible) whose disease was in CR or in CR except for bone metastases following six cycles (6 months) of doxorubicin-containing induction treatment were randomized to receive cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, prednisone, tamoxifen, and halotestin [CMF(P)TH] or observation. In a previous pilot study, patients in CR after 24 months of induction treatment were randomized to continue chemotherapy for 4 more years or stop chemotherapy. RESULTS Among patients randomized to CMF(P)TH, life-threatening toxicity included leukopenia in 3%, thrombocytopenia in 3%, cardiac in 2%, and diabetes in 1%. The median time to relapse from randomization was 18.7 months on CMF(P)TH and only 7.8 months on observation (P < .0001). The median time to death was 32.2 months on CMF(P)TH and 28.7 months on observation (P=.74). Similar results were seen in the pilot study (median time to relapse, 12.6 and 6.4 months; median survival, 37.7 and 24.2 months; study too small for statistical significance). Maintenance treatment was always the most significant covariate in time-to-relapse models. CONCLUSION There is definite toxicity associated with CMF(P)TH maintenance treatment. When CR was obtained on induction, maintenance treatment with CMF(P)TH was never significant in survival models. However, maintenance treatment was always the most significant covariate in the time-to-relapse models, which motivates its consideration for appropriately informed patients.

PURPOSE To determine whether the addition of surgical ovariectomy to standard chemotherapy prolongs disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival in premenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive operable breast cancer with positive axillary nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS Three hundred fourteen premenopausal patients with ER-positive, node-positive breast cancer were enrolled between July 1979 and July 1989. Patients were stratified according to number of involved nodes and type of primary surgery and randomized to receive either of the following: (1) cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2/d by mouth for 1 year, methotrexate 15 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) weekly for 1 year, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for 1 year, vincristine .625 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for the first 10 weeks, and prednisone weeks 1 to 10 with doses decreasing from 30 mg/m2 to 2.5 mg/m2 (CMFVP); or (2) bilateral ovariectomy followed by CMFVP. RESULTS The median follow-up time is 7.7 years and the maximum 13.2 years. Treatment arms are not significantly different with respect to either survival or DFS (one-sided log-rank, P = .55 and .70, respectively). The 7-year survival rate is 71% on the CMFVP arm and 73% on CMFVP plus ovariectomy. No significant differences were observed in node or receptor level subsets. CONCLUSION We conclude that, in this study, the addition of ovariectomy did not improve results over chemotherapy alone in the treatment of premenopausal women with node-positive, ER-positive, operable breast cancer. Our sample size was too small to detect a small improvement. The death hazards ratio of CMFVP/CMFVP plus ovariectomy was 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], .79 to 1.89).

PURPOSE To compare 1 year of therapy with continuous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil (5-FU), vincristine, and prednisone (CMFVP) with a short course of treatment with a doxorubicin-based regimen in the postsurgical adjuvant treatment of patients with hormone receptor-negative, node-positive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Five-hundred thirty-one eligible women with hormone receptor-negative, node-positive breast cancer were randomized to receive either 1 year of therapy with CMFVP or 20 weeks of therapy with four 5-week courses of treatment with 5-FU, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and methotrexate (FAC-M). RESULTS At a median follow-up time of 4.9 years, the two treatment arms cannot be demonstrated to be different with respect to overall survival (stratified log-rank, P = .27). The 5-year survival rate is 64% on the CMFVP arm and 61% on the FAC-M arm. CMFVP produces marginally superior disease-free survival (P = .06). The estimated 5-year disease-free survival rate is 55% for patients treated with CMFVP as opposed to 50% for patients treated with FAC-M. CONCLUSION Neither regimen was shown to be superior in terms of overall survival. Because the disease-free survival produced by CMFVP is marginally superior to that produced by FAC-M, we do not recommend FAC-M for further investigation or for routine use. Possible implications of this study are discussed in the context of other adjuvant chemotherapy trials.

PURPOSE To compare chemohormonal therapy, chemotherapy alone, and hormonal therapy alone in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive operable breast cancer and positive axillary nodes with respect to survival and disease-free survival (DFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eight hundred ninety-two postmenopausal women with ER-positive, node-positive breast cancer were enrolled by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) from July 1979 to March 1989 and 74 by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) between June 1987 and March 1989. Patients were stratified according to number of involved nodes and type of primary surgery and randomized to receive the following: (1) tamoxifen 10 mg twice daily by mouth for 1 year; (2) cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2/d by mouth for 1 year, methotrexate 15 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) weekly for 1 year, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 IV weekly for 1 year, vincristine .625 mg/m2 IV weekly for the first 10 weeks, and prednisone during weeks 1 to 10 with doses decreasing from 30 mg/m2 to 2.5 mg/m2 (CMFVP); or (3) the combination of tamoxifen and CMFVP. RESULTS The median follow-up duration is 6.5 years, with a maximum of 12.8 years. Treatment arms are not significantly different with respect to either survival or DFS (log-rank, 2 df, P = .82 and .23, respectively). The 5-year survival rate is 77% for the tamoxifen arm, 78% for CMFVP, and 75% for the combination. No significant differences were observed in node or receptor level subsets. Severe or worse toxicity was experienced by 56% of patients on CMFVP and 61% on CMFVP plus tamoxifen, compared with 5% on tamoxifen alone. CONCLUSION CMFVP chemotherapy, either alone or in combination with tamoxifen, has not been shown to be superior to tamoxifen alone in the treatment of postmenopausal women with node-positive, ER-positive, operable breast cancer.

About 180,000 American women will be diagnosed with early stage breast cancer during 1993. In many of these patients breast cancer is a systemic disease at diagnosis and thus not curable by local treatment alone. The development of optimal forms of systemic adjuvant therapy has been a major area of research for more than 30 years. The two most widely employed types of adjuvant therapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy and tamoxifen, have been shown to improve relapse-free and overall survival in certain patient subsets. This review highlights recent advances in adjuvant therapy of early stage breast cancer and discusses current treatment guidelines.

Up to 15% of women with breast cancer have locally advanced disease at diagnosis. The poor response of these patients to local therapy alone and the frequent development of disseminated disease suggest that early intensive systemic therapy may benefit these women. Twenty-four patients with non-metastatic, locally advanced, primarily inflammatory, inoperable breast cancer were treated with a 16-week dose-intense chemotherapy regimen as induction therapy. Treatment consisted of 8 repetitive 2-week cycles consisting of 100 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide orally D1-7, 40 mg/m2 doxorubicin intravenously (IV) D1, 1 mg vincristine IV D1, 100 mg/m2 methotrexate IV D1, 10 mg/m2 leucovorin every 6 hours for six oral doses D2-3, and 600 mg/m2 5-FU IV over 2 hours D2. A continuous infusion of 300 mg/m2 5-FU per day was given IV D8-9 of each 2-week cycle. After induction all patients had at least a partial clinical response and were operable; 9/24 (37%) achieved a clinical complete response. All patients underwent at least a simple mastectomy. Pathologic examination revealed no evidence of gross macroscopic tumor in 11/24 patients (46%) and no evidence of microscopic disease in 4/24 patients (17%). Seven of 24 patients (29%) had no microscopic disease in the breast. At a median follow-up of 45 months, there have been 10 relapses in the 24 patients treated with this induction regimen. The actuarial relapse-free survival at 5 years is 58%. Actuarial overall survival at 5 years is 75%. We conclude that this regimen is safe and well-tolerated and that the results of this therapy are sufficiently promising to warrant further study of this regimen in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE To determine the response rate of postmenopausal breast cancer patients to the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GN-RH) agonist, Zoladex (goserelin; ICI Pharma, Wilmington, DE). PATIENTS AND METHODS A multi-institutional single-agent trial in postmenopausal patients was conducted. Serum levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testosterone, and estradiol were requested before and after Zoladex treatment. RESULTS For estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) patients, the response rate was 11%, with one complete response (CR) and three partial responses (PRs) among 36 eligible patients. Responses were of short duration. There were no responses among 16 estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) patients. CONCLUSION GN-RH agonists have activity in ER+ postmenopausal patients, but response rates are not as high as with other available endocrine therapies and the duration of response is short.

In 1989, Hrushesky et al. (1) reported preliminary results of a retrospective study which identified the timing of breast cancer surgery in relation to the menstrual cycle as an independent predictor of disease-free survival for 41 premenopausal women. At least a dozen reports have subsequently appeared, some supporting and others refuting the claim. The debate has been played out both in the medical literature and in the lay press, resulting in much confusion for patients and physicians alike. This review will examine the biological plausibility of the hypothesis that the menstrual cycle can influence surgical outcome, the results of clinical studies done to date, and the potential methodological pitfalls inherent in performing these retrospective reviews.

As has been noted in the previous papers on individual clinical trials and the latest overview update [1] (reprinted in part in this volume), systemic adjuvant therapy has resulted in a significant and long-lasting reduction in mortality due to early breast cancer. However, it is also apparent from these analyses that many patients develop metastatic disease and die of breast cancer despite having received standard adjuvant therapeutic regimens. In order to achieve further improvement in survival with systemic adjuvant therapy, several hurdles must be surmounted, including (a) enhanced ability to identify patients who are unlikely to respond to current treatments and (b) development of more effective therapies. This paper focuses on the latter issue and specifically the use of high-dose cytotoxic chemotherapy as an approach to improving systemic adjuvant therapy.

The use of systemic chemotherapy for 1 or more years to treat women with postoperative ipsilateral node-positive (N+) breast carcinoma was begun in 1972 and 1973. The initial results from these early trials suggested an advantage for treatment with both L-phenylalanine mustard (L-Pam) and for a cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) combination [1, 2]. During this period the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) metastatic disease trials demonstrated the superiority of CMF over L-Pam [3] and that of CMF plus prednisone (CMFP) over CMF [4]. Simultaneously, tamoxifen (Tam) became accepted as an active hormonal treatment for disseminated disease [5,6]. The addition of Tam to an advanced-disease chemotherapy regimen was also beneficial [7]. These data led the ECOG to perform adjuvant therapy trials in N+ women that compared the therapeutic effectiveness of 1 year of CMFP plus Tam (CMFPT) to CMFP and CMF in premenopausal women, and to CMFP and observation (Obs) in postmenopausal women. The results showed no significant difference with the addition of Tam to this 1-year chemotherapy regimen [8, 9]. However, early analyses suggested an advantage for the CMFPT regimen in both pre- and postmenopausal patients. This program was thereby chosen as the control regimen for the trials reported here.

PURPOSE A randomized trial was performed in premenopausal postoperative women with ipsilateral axillary node-positive (N+) breast carcinoma and known estrogen receptor (ER) status to assess the efficacy of an Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH)-based induction regimen and 5 or more years of tamoxifen (Tam). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received 12 28-day cycles of cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 orally days 1 to 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) days 1 and 8, fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 IV days 1 and 8, prednisone 40 mg/m2 orally days 1 to 14, and Tam 10 mg orally twice daily (CMFPT), or the same regimen plus halotestin 10 mg orally twice daily (CMFPTH) alternating monthly with 22-day cycles of vinblastine 4.5 mg/m2 IV day 1, Adriamycin 45 mg/m2 IV day 1, thiotepa 12 mg/m2 IV day 1, halotestin, and Tam (ALTER). Prednisone in the ALTER regimen was stopped after the second CMFPTH cycle. After 12 cycles, patients were again randomized to stop or continue Tam. After 5 years, patients on Tam were again randomized to continue or stop Tam; the results from this randomization are still coded. Among 533 analyzed induction cases, 263 received CMFPT and 270 ALTER. Among 396 analyzed maintenance cases, 201 continued Tam and 195 were observed. Pretreatment characteristics were balanced among treatments. The median follow-up times are 5.1 years for induction and 4.1 years for maintenance. RESULTS The time to relapse (TTR) was superior for the ALTER regimen (P = .04) and for the maintenance Tam (P = .05). Overall survival comparisons between the regimens are not statistically different. A longer TTR was associated with decreasing nodal involvement, ER+ status, and increasing age. The favorable effects of decreasing nodal involvement and ER+ status carried over to survival; a progesterone receptor-positive (PgR+) status and decreasing tumor size were also associated with longer survival. Development of amenorrhea was associated with improved TTR and survival. Toxicity was similar for the two induction regimens and for the two maintenance regimens. Overall relapse patterns were similar among the induction regimens, but continuing Tam led to fewer locoregional relapses. CONCLUSION The results suggest significant overall TTR therapeutic benefits of an Adriamycin-containing alternating induction regimen and of continuing maintenance Tam therapy for at least 5 years.

Of the 180,000 women who will be found to have breast cancer in 1991, over 90% will present with disease clinically limited to the breast and axillary lymph nodes. Unfortunately nearly one half of these women will later develop and ultimately die of metastatic breast cancer. It is now accepted that breast cancer is a systemic disease at diagnosis in many patients and therefore not curable by local treatment alone. Thus there has been considerable interest in developing effective forms of systemic adjuvant therapy with the goal of eradicating micrometastases and thereby improving relapse-free and overall survival. This chapter will review the results of major clinical trials using adjuvant chemotherapeutic and chemohormonal approaches. It will focus specifically on published randomized trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with axillary lymph-node-positive breast cancer. Studies of chemotherapy in node-negative breast cancer are reviewed in . The results of individual trials that evaluate perioperative chemotherapy, optimal duration of therapy, single agent vs. combination chemotherapy, utility of doxorubicin-containing regimens, combined chemohormonal therapy, and chemoimmunotherapy will be discussed. Relevant results from the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Overview analysis will also be highlighted, as will certain critical concepts, such as dose intensity. Finally, the recommendations of the 1985 and 1990 National Institutes of Health Consensus Conferences on Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer will be reviewed, and our current recommendations regarding adjuvant chemotherapy for women with axillary lymph-node-positive breast cancer will be presented.

Patients with solid tumors are often anemic even before they undergo cytotoxic therapy. Since the cause of the anemia of cancer is unknown, we examined the possible role of erythropoietin. Using a sensitive radioimmunoassay, we determined serum immunoreactive erythropoietin levels in 81 anemic patients with solid tumors. For any given degree of anemia, the serum concentration of immunoreactive erythropoietin was lower in this group of patients than in a group of control patients with iron-deficiency anemia (P = 0.0001). Furthermore, the expected inverse linear relation between serum levels of immunoreactive erythropoietin and of hemoglobin was absent in the group with cancer. The erythropoietin response was further decreased in patients receiving chemotherapy; it was not influenced by the presence or absence of cisplatin in the treatment regimen. The inability of the patients with cancer to produce erythropoietin was not absolute; if they had hypoxemia, adequate erythropoietin production was restored. We conclude that erythropoietin levels are inappropriately low in anemia associated with cancer, and that erythropoietin deficiency may contribute to the development of this form of anemia. Treatment of the anemia of cancer with erythropoietin may be of value.