4 results on '"Marthe Kirkesæther Brun"'
Search Results
2. Risk factors for anti-drug antibody formation to infliximab: Secondary analyses of a randomised controlled trial
- Author
-
Marthe Kirkesæther Brun, Guro Løvik Goll, Kristin Kaasen Jørgensen, Joseph Sexton, Johanna Elin Gehin, Øystein Sandanger, Inge Christoffer Olsen, Rolf Anton Klaasen, David John Warren, Cato Mørk, Tore K. Kvien, Jørgen Jahnsen, Nils Bolstad, Espen A. Haavardsholm, and Silje Watterdal Syversen
- Subjects
Arthritis, Rheumatoid ,Risk Factors ,Antirheumatic Agents ,Antibody Formation ,Internal Medicine ,Humans ,Antibodies ,Infliximab - Abstract
Background Anti-drug antibodies (ADAb) frequently form early in the treatment course of infliximab and other tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, leading to treatment failure and adverse events. Objective To identify risk factors for ADAb in the early phase of infliximab treatment. Methods Patients (n = 410) with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases who initiated infliximab treatment were included in the 38-week Norwegian Drug Monitoring Trial (NOR-DRUM) A and randomised 1:1 to therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) or standard therapy. Serum levels of infliximab and ADAb were measured at each infusion. Possible risk factors for ADAb formation were assessed using logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounders. Results ADAb were detected in 78 (19%) patients. A diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (odds ratio [OR], 1.9 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0–3.6]) and lifetime smoking (OR, 2.0 [CI 1.1–3.6]) were baseline risk factors, while baseline use of concomitant immunosuppressors (OR, 0.4 [CI 0.2–0.8]) and a diagnosis of spondyloarthritis (SpA) (OR, 0.4 [CI 0.2–0.8]) reduced the risk of ADAb. Higher disease activity during follow-up (OR, 1.1 [CI 1.0–1.1]) and “drug holidays” of more than 11 weeks (OR, 4.1 [CI 1.2–13.8]) increased the risk of ADAb, whereas higher infliximab doses (OR, 0.1 [CI 0.0–0.3) and higher serum infliximab concentrations (OR, 0.7 [CI 0.6–0.8]) reduced the risk of immunogenicity. Conclusion Several risk factors for ADAb formation during early-phase infliximab treatment were identified. This knowledge provides a basis for treatment strategies to mitigate the formation of ADAb and identify patients in whom these measures are of particular importance.
- Published
- 2022
3. Effect of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring vs Standard Therapy During Maintenance Infliximab Therapy on Disease Control in Patients With Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- Author
-
Silje Watterdal Syversen, Kristin Kaasen Jørgensen, Guro Løvik Goll, Marthe Kirkesæther Brun, Øystein Sandanger, Kristin Hammersbøen Bjørlykke, Joseph Sexton, Inge Christoffer Olsen, Johanna Elin Gehin, David John Warren, Rolf Anton Klaasen, Geir Noraberg, Trude Jannecke Bruun, Christian Kvikne Dotterud, Maud Kristine Aga Ljoså, Anne Julsrud Haugen, Rune Johan Njålla, Camilla Zettel, Carl Magnus Ystrøm, Yngvill Hovde Bragnes, Svanaug Skorpe, Turid Thune, Kathrine Aglen Seeberg, Brigitte Michelsen, Ingrid Marianne Blomgren, Eldri Kveine Strand, Pawel Mielnik, Roald Torp, Cato Mørk, Tore K. Kvien, Jørgen Jahnsen, Nils Bolstad, and Espen A. Haavardsholm
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Arthritis ,Standard of Care ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Inflammatory Bowel Diseases ,Infliximab ,Maintenance Chemotherapy ,Gastrointestinal Agents ,Humans ,Psoriasis ,Female ,Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors ,Drug Monitoring ,Algorithms ,Original Investigation - Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), consisting of individualized treatment based on scheduled assessments of serum drug levels, has been proposed as an alternative to standard therapy to optimize efficacy and safety of infliximab and other biologic drugs. However, it remains unclear whether proactive TDM improves clinical outcomes during maintenance therapy. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether proactive TDM during maintenance therapy with infliximab improves treatment efficacy by preventing disease worsening compared with standard infliximab therapy without TDM. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized, parallel-group, open-label clinical trial including 458 adults with rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn disease, or psoriasis undergoing maintenance therapy with infliximab in 20 Norwegian hospitals. Patients were recruited from June 7, 2017, to December 12, 2019. Final follow-up took place on December 14, 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to proactive TDM with dose and interval adjustments based on scheduled monitoring of serum drug levels and antidrug antibodies (TDM group; n = 228) or to standard infliximab therapy without drug and antibody level monitoring (standard therapy group; n = 230). MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was sustained disease control without disease worsening, defined by disease-specific composite scores or consensus about disease worsening between patient and physician leading to a major change in treatment (switching to another biologic drug, adding an immunosuppressive drug including glucocorticoids, or increasing the infliximab dose), during the 52-week study period. RESULTS: Among 458 randomized patients (mean age, 44.8 [SD, 14.3] years; 216 women [49.8%]), 454 received their randomly allocated intervention and were included in the full analysis set. The primary outcome of sustained disease control without disease worsening was observed in 167 patients (73.6%) in the TDM group and 127 patients (55.9%) in the standard therapy group. The estimated adjusted difference was 17.6% (95% CI, 9.0%-26.2%; P
- Published
- 2021
4. Effect of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring vs Standard Therapy During Infliximab Induction on Disease Remission in Patients With Chronic Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- Author
-
Nils Bolstad, Svanaug Skorpe, Yngvill Hovde Bragnes, Øystein Sandanger, Anne Julsrud Haugen, Roald Torp, Lars Normann Karlsen, Silje W Syversen, G. L. Goll, Ingrid M. Blomgren, David J. Warren, Camilla Zettel, Inge C. Olsen, Turid Thune, Christian Kvikne Dotterud, Brigitte Michelsen, Jørgen Jahnsen, Rune Johan Njålla, Geir Noraberg, K. K. Jørgensen, Pawel Mielnik, Carl Magnus Ystrøm, Kathrine A. Seeberg, J. E. Gehin, Joseph O. Sexton, Tore K Kvien, C. Mørk, Maud Kristine Aga Ljoså, Rolf Anton Klaasen, Trude Jannecke Bruun, Marthe Kirkesæther Brun, Espen A Haavardsholm, and E. K. Strand
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,010102 general mathematics ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,01 natural sciences ,Ulcerative colitis ,Infliximab ,law.invention ,Clinical trial ,03 medical and health sciences ,Psoriatic arthritis ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Therapeutic drug monitoring ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Clinical endpoint ,030212 general & internal medicine ,0101 mathematics ,business ,Adverse effect ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Importance Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), defined as individualized drug dosing based on scheduled monitoring of serum drug levels, has been proposed as an alternative to standard therapy to maximize efficacy and safety of infliximab and other biological drugs. However, whether proactive TDM improves clinical outcomes when implemented at the time of drug initiation, compared with standard therapy, remains unclear. Objective To assess whether TDM during initiation of infliximab therapy improves treatment efficacy compared with standard infliximab therapy without TDM. Design, Setting, and Participants Randomized, parallel-group, open-label clinical trial of 411 adults with rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ulcerative colitis, Crohn disease, or psoriasis initiating infliximab therapy in 21 hospitals in Norway. Patients were recruited from March 1, 2017, to January 10, 2019. Final follow-up occurred on November 5, 2019. Interventions Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive proactive TDM with dose and interval adjustments based on scheduled monitoring of serum drug levels and antidrug antibodies (TDM group; n = 207) or standard infliximab therapy without drug and antibody level monitoring (standard therapy group; n = 204). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was clinical remission at week 30. Results Among 411 randomized patients (mean age, 44.7 [SD, 14.9] years; 209 women [51%]), 398 (198 in the TDM group and 200 in the standard therapy group) received their randomized intervention and were included in the full analysis set. Clinical remission at week 30 was achieved in 100 (50.5%) of 198 and 106 (53.0%) of 200 patients in the TDM and standard therapy groups, respectively (adjusted difference, 1.5%; 95% CI, −8.2% to 11.1%;P = .78). Adverse events were reported in 135 patients (68%) and 139 patients (70%) in the TDM and standard therapy groups, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance Among patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases initiating treatment with infliximab, proactive therapeutic drug monitoring, compared with standard therapy, did not significantly improve clinical remission rates over 30 weeks. These findings do not support routine use of therapeutic drug monitoring during infliximab induction for improving disease remission rates. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03074656
- Published
- 2021
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.