Search

PURPOSEDuring military conflicts, the immediate response to a severely disrupted health care system often overlooks the needs of patients with cancer who require continuous specialized care. The full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 was no exception, leaving many Ukrainian patients without access to essential care.MATERIALS AND METHODSWe conducted a retrospective cohort study to assess the impact of the MedEvac program, facilitating the transfer of Ukrainian patients with cancer to European Union (EU) institutions for treatment, and to describe its components. Patient data from the Ministry of Health of Ukraine (MOH) database (April 2022-April 2023) were analyzed.RESULTSOf 639 applications in the MOH database, 339 (53.1%) had sufficient data for analysis and, of those, 281 (82.9%) were evacuated to EU hospitals. Median age of evacuated patients was 47 (IQR, 38-58) years and most were newly diagnosed (94.0%, n = 264). Predominantly, patients were evacuated for systemic cancer therapy (81.9%, n = 230). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-2) was the most significant factor associated with evacuation (odds ratio [OR], 9.64 [95% CI, 3.08 to 30.23]). Patients with melanoma were more likely to be evacuated, even after adjustment for performance status (OR, 2.56 [95% CI, 1.14 to 5.72]), while patients with head and neck cancer were significantly less so (OR, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.72]).CONCLUSIONMedEvac program provides a viable model for medical evacuation and management of patients with cancer amid prolonged military conflict, highlighting the importance of international cooperation and setting a precedent for other crisis responses. Continuous evaluation and adaptation are essential to ensure the program's effectiveness and sustainability.

PURPOSEThis study aims to identify the factors influencing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening practices, along with the barriers and facilitators from the perspective of primary care physicians (PCPs) in Ukraine. Considering health care system challenges, including those posed by the ongoing war, this research seeks to inform improvements in CRC screening and outcomes in Ukraine and other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).METHODSA survey was designed and distributed electronically to Ukrainian PCPs, focusing on CRC screening practices, beliefs, and barriers. The survey incorporated questions adapted from established cancer screening surveys and frameworks. Complete responses were collected from 740 PCPs. Sample statistics were computed, and population-level perceptions and associations with CRC screening practices were estimated by standardizing responses to national PCP demographics.RESULTSThe majority of respondents were women (91%) and specialized in family medicine (84%). Respondents believed in the effectiveness of colonoscopy for reducing CRC mortality (80%), with 75% of PCPs referring patients for this screening modality. Major barriers identified include inadequate training of PCPs in screening and lack of resources. Respondents reported high utilization of fecal occult blood test and colonoscopy for screening when these tests were said to be available in their practices. Self-reported familiarity with CRC screening guidelines and participation in educational workshops were positively associated with screening referrals.CONCLUSIONThe study highlights the role of access to CRC screening tests and awareness of screening guidelines in enhancing CRC screening practices among Ukrainian PCPs. Addressing training and resource barriers, alongside public health interventions targeting patient-related barriers, is essential. These findings offer valuable insights for LMICs facing similar challenges, emphasizing the need for tailored strategies to improve cancer screening in these health care settings.

PURPOSECytoreductive surgery/hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) programs are often limited to centers in developed countries because of extensive requirements. We aimed to analyze efficacy and challenges of CRS/HIPEC centers in lower-middle–income settings in the Ukraine example.METHODSA multicenter descriptive study was conducted using data sets (2008-2022) from Kyiv, Lviv, and Odesa centers. Patients with appendiceal neoplasm (AN); colorectal cancer (CRC); malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM); and epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer (EOC) treated with CRS ± HIPEC were included. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed for N ≥ 20 cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier method.RESULTSWe included 596 patients. At Kyiv and Lviv centers, 37 and 28 patients with AN had completeness of cytoreduction (CC-0/1) rates of 84% and 71%, respectively. Thirty-day major morbidity stood at 24% and 18%, respectively. Median OS was not reached (NR) at both centers. Nineteen patients with CRC from Kyiv, 11 from Lviv, and 156 from Odesa had CC‐0/1 rates of 84%, 91%, and 86%, respectively. Thirty-day major complications occurred in 16%, 18%, and 8%, respectively. Median OS in the Odesa cohort was 35 (95% CI, 32 to 38) months. Among 15 Kyiv, five Lviv, and six Odesa patients with MPM, CC‐0/1 rates were 67%, 80%, and 100%, respectively, while major complications occurred in 13%, 0%, and 17%, respectively. OS was not analyzed because of small MPM cohorts. At Kyiv, Lviv, and Odesa centers, 91, 40, and 89 patients, respectively, had primary EOC. CC-0/1 rates were 79%, 100%, and 80%, and 30-day major morbidity rates were 23%, 5%, and 6%, respectively. Median OS was NR, 71 (95% CI, 32 to 110), and 67 (95% CI, 61 to 73) months, respectively.CONCLUSIONCRS/HIPEC programs in lower-middle–income environment can achieve safety and survival that meet global standards. Our discussion highlights common obstacles in such settings and proposes effective overcoming strategies.