Search

The study documented three-dimensional spinal loading during lifting from an industrial bin. Two lifting styles and two bin design factors were examined in Phase I. The lifting style measures in Phase I were one hand versus two hand and standing on one foot versus two feet. The bin design variables were region of load in the bin and bin height. The Phase II study examined one-handed lifting styles with and without supporting body weight with the free hand on the bin as well as region and the number of feet. Twelve male and 12 female subjects lifted an 11.3 kg box from the bin. Spinal compression, lateral shear and anterior – posterior shear forces were estimated using a validated EMG-assisted biomechanical model. Phase I results indicated that the bin design factor of region had the greatest impact on spinal loading. The upper front region minimized spinal loading for all lifting styles. Furthermore, the lifting style of two hands and two feet minimized spinal loading. However, comparing Phase I two-handed lifting with Phase II one-handed supported lifting, the one-handed supported lifting techniques had lower compressive and anterior – posterior shear loads in the lower regions as well as the upper back region of the bin. A bin design that facilitates lifting from the upper front region of the bin reduces spinal loading more effectively than specific lifting styles. Furthermore, a bin design with a hand hold may facilitate workers using a supported lifting style that reduces spinal loading. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Typically, the simplest and most cost-efficient ergonomic solution to offset the rising costs of low back injuries is to reduce the box weight that is lifted. However, there is limited research on how a worker interacts with the box. In the present study, we quantify the utility of reducing the weight that is lifted - specifically, how changes in the box weight affect trunk kinematics, trunk moments, and ultimately, spinal loads. In the experiment, 15 participants lifted a variety of box weights (from 9.1 to 41.7 kg) from knee height, carried it a distance of 5 feet (1.5 m), and placed it on a shelf at elbow height. For the lower weights, small increases in box weight (3-9 kg) were offset by the trunk dynamics (sagittal velocity), resulting in no difference in spinal loads. At the same time, spinal loads were found to be significantly higher for weights above 25 kg. Thus, when making ergonomic changes (reduction of box weight), it is important to consider how workers will interact with the box. These results indicate that purely weight-based ergonomic controls might not sufficiently reduce the risk of low back disorders. Furthermore, this study provides additional evidence of the utility of using more complex spinal load models (dynamic, multiple muscle models) when evaluating highly dynamic and complex tasks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most biomechanical assessments of spinal loading during industrial work have focused on estimating peak spinal compressive forces under static and sagittally symmetric conditions. The main objective of this study was to explore the potential of feasibly predicting three-dimensional (3D) spinal loading in industry from various combinations of trunk kinematics, kinetics, and subject-load characteristics. The study used spinal loading, predicted by a validated electromyography-assisted model, from 11 male participants who performed a series of symmetric and asymmetric lifts. Three classes of models were developed: (a) models using workplace, subject, and trunk motion parameters as independent variables (kinematic models); (b) models using workplace, subject, and measured moments variables (kinetic models); and (c) models incorporating workplace, subject, trunk motion, and measured moments variables (combined models). The results showed that peak 3D spinal loading during symmetric and asymmetric lifting were predicted equally well using all three types of regression models. Continuous 3D loading was predicted best using the combined models. When the use of such models is infeasible, the kinematic models can provide adequate predictions. Finally, lateral shear forces (peak and continuous) were consistently underestimated using all three types of models. The study demonstrated the feasibility of predicting 3D loads on the spine under specific symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks without the need for collecting EMG information. However, further validation and development of the models should be conducted to assess and extend their applicability to lifting conditions other than those presented in this study. Actual or potential applications of this research include exposure assessment in epidemiological studies, ergonomic intervention, and laboratory task assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study examined the effects of trunk speed and exertion level on temporal aspects of trunk muscle activity patterns during dynamic, asymmetric lifting. Electromyographic (EMG) data from eight trunk muscles were collected along with trunk torque output, position, and velocity data during several repetitions of four speed/loading combination conditions. During analysis, each muscle's EMG record was reduced to three key events: a start, a peak, and an end point. For each subject, temporally ordered event lists were constructed for each test condition. Networks of events that consistently occurred regardless of loading or speed levels were constructed for each subject. Two event pairs occurred consistently for all subjects under all conditions, whereas some pairs occurred in association with specific speed or resistance levels. Temporal information related to muscle activity could be used in biomechanical models in order to predict changes in spinal loading during the course of workplace tasks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A three-dimensional motion model has been developed that estimates loads on the lumbar spine under laboratory conditions that simulate manual materials handling conditions. Eleven subjects experienced spinal loading during an experiment in which conditions of trunk velocity, trunk torque output, and trunk asymmetric posture were varied in a series of isokinetic velocity trunk extensions. The electromyographic activity of 10 trunk muscles, subject anthropometry, and trunk kinetics were used as input to a biomechanical simulation model described in Part I of this study. The model calculated estimates of compression, shear, and torsion loading in the lumbar spine, as well as the torque production of the trunk, continuously throughout the exertion. Trunk torque estimates derived from this model were compared with measured trunk torque. The effects of trunk motion, posture, and torque level on spine loading as estimated by the model are discussed. It was concluded that this approach provides a straightforward means of assessing loading of the spine attributable to laboratory simulations of workplace conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Traditionally most biomechanical models that are used to estimate the loading experienced by the spine during work focus on static, two-dimensional representations of the work. However, most work tasks impose loads on the lumbar spine under dynamic, three-dimensional conditions. The objective of this study was to describe the structure and logic of a model that is capable of producing estimates of spine loading under three-dimensional motion conditions. This model is intended for use primarily under laboratory conditions. The model was designed initially for workplace simulation in which the trunk is moving under symmetric and asymmetric constant velocity lifting conditions. Future embellishments may enable the model to be used under free dynamic conditions. The model predicts lumbar spine compression, shear, and torsional forces as well as trunk torque production continuously throughout the exertion. This information may be compared with spine tolerance limits so that the risk of causing a vertebral end-plate microfracture by workplace requirements could be determined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An experiment was performed to evaluate the motions of the lumbar spine during a constant load velocity lift. For the purposes of this study, a constant load velocity refers to the linear vertical velocity of the load. This vertical load velocity was controlled using a modified angular isokinetic dynamometer, which produced linear isokinetic motion during a lift. A lumbar monitor was used to observe the position, velocity, and acceleration changes that occurred in the lumbar spine during the lifting task. The results indicate that under constant load velocity conditions, significant angular accelerations occur at the lumbar level. The nature of these accelerations was found to depend on several variables associated with a lifting task, such as the load velocity and the asymmetry of the lift. The physical significance of these results would be increased spinal loading above that which would be predicted using a static model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This research investigated how changes in hammer handle angle and hammering orientation affected muscle fatigue in the forearm and subjective ratings of body discomfort. Forearm muscle fatigue and discomfort ratings were not significantly affected by handle angle, but they were significantly higher in the wall hammering orientation than in the bench orientation. The research in this article and in the companion article (Part I) reveal that for novices, hammers with handles angled in the range of 20-40 deg are advantageous because (1) they reduce ulnar deviation and may possibly decrease the incidence of hand/wrist disorders, and (2) they do not significantly affect hammering performance in the bench conditions, forearm muscle fatigue, or subjective ratings of body discomfort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This research investigated the range of wrist motion characteristics associated with the ergonomic principle of "bending the tool and not the wrist" as applied to the hammer. It is thought that bending the tool reduces angular wrist motion, which has been shown in the literature to be a risk factor in hand/wrist disorders such as carpal tunnel syndrome and tenosynovitis. Hammer handles angled at 0 (straight), 20, and 40 deg were investigated in this study. For novices, hammer handles bent at 20 and 40 deg resulted in less total ulnar deviation than straight hammers. However, there was a trade-off in beginning and ending positions of the wrist in that the angled hammers reduced ulnar deviation at the impact position but increased radial deviation at the starting position of a hammer stroke. Handle angle did not significantly affect hammering performance. Wrist motion was affected minimally by hammering orientation, but hammering performance was significantly worse in the wall orientation compared with the bench orientation. This research suggests that for novice users, hammers with handles bent in the range of 20 to 40 deg could possibly decrease the incidence of hand/wrist disorders caused by hammering. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]