1. Regulatory Pathways for New Antimicrobial Agents: Trade‐offs to Keep the Perfect From Being the Enemy of the Good
- Author
-
Spellberg, B, Marr, KA, and Brass, EP
- Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Clinical Sciences ,Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities ,Clinical Research ,6.1 Pharmaceuticals ,Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions ,Development of treatments and therapeutic interventions ,5.1 Pharmaceuticals ,Anti-Infective Agents ,Clinical Trials as Topic ,Drug Industry ,Humans ,Research ,Research Design ,Uncertainty ,United States ,United States Food and Drug Administration ,Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences ,Pharmacology & Pharmacy ,Pharmacology and pharmaceutical sciences - Abstract
In 2002, Shlaes and Moellering warned that pharmaceutical companies were abandoning antibiotic research and development due to changing regulatory standards regarding noninferiority (NI) clinical trials. NI trials are subject to unique biases that may yield false-positive conclusions. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) developed guidance to ensure that NI results truly reflect drug efficacy. These changes, intended to reduce uncertainty in trial results, have shaped trial enrollment and conduct in ways that now require reflection.
- Published
- 2016