Search

Heterozygous de novo missense variants of SRP54 were recently identified in patients with congenital neutropenia (CN) who display symptoms that overlap with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome (SDS). Here, we investigate srp54 knockout zebrafish as the first in vivo model of SRP54 deficiency. srp54−/− zebrafish experience embryonic lethality and display multisystemic developmental defects along with severe neutropenia. In contrast, srp54+/− zebrafish are viable, fertile, and show only mild neutropenia. Interestingly, injection of human SRP54 messenger RNAs (mRNAs) that carry mutations observed in patients (T115A, T117Δ, and G226E) aggravated neutropenia and induced pancreatic defects in srp54+/− fish, mimicking the corresponding human clinical phenotypes. These data suggest that the various phenotypes observed in patients may be a result of mutation-specific dominant-negative effects on the functionality of the residual wild-type SRP54 protein. Overexpression of mutated SRP54 also consistently induced neutropenia in wild-type fish and impaired the granulocytic maturation of human promyelocytic HL-60 cells and healthy cord blood–derived CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Mechanistically, srp54-mutant fish and human cells show impaired unconventional splicing of the transcription factor X-box binding protein 1 (Xbp1). Moreover, xbp1 morphants recapitulate phenotypes observed in srp54 deficiency and, importantly, injection of spliced, but not unspliced, xbp1 mRNA rescues neutropenia in srp54+/− zebrafish. Together, these data indicate that SRP54 is critical for the development of various tissues, with neutrophils reacting most sensitively to the loss of SRP54. The heterogenic phenotypes observed in patients that range from mild CN to SDS-like disease may be the result of different dominant-negative effects of mutated SRP54 proteins on downstream XBP1 splicing, which represents a potential therapeutic target.

Simple Summary Relapse after apparent remission remains a major cause of death in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). On the cellular level, leukemia relapse is considered to emerge from subpopulations of therapy-resistant leukemic stem cells (LSC). Identification and targeting of LSC are thus most important goals for AML treatment. However, AML and their LSC are highly heterogeneous. Here, we review the current knowledge on AML LSC identification and targeting via surface antigens with a focus on heterogeneity among different AML subgroups and genetic backgrounds. Abstract Patients suffering from acute myeloid leukemia (AML) show highly heterogeneous clinical outcomes. Next to variabilities in patient-specific parameters influencing treatment decisions and outcome, this is due to differences in AML biology. In fact, different genetic drivers may transform variable cells of origin and co-exist with additional genetic lesions (e.g., as observed in clonal hematopoiesis) in a variety of leukemic (sub)clones. Moreover, AML cells are hierarchically organized and contain subpopulations of more immature cells called leukemic stem cells (LSC), which on the cellular level constitute the driver of the disease and may evolve during therapy. This genetic and hierarchical complexity results in a pronounced phenotypic variability, which is observed among AML cells of different patients as well as among the leukemic blasts of individual patients, at diagnosis and during the course of the disease. Here, we review the current knowledge on the heterogeneous landscape of AML surface markers with particular focus on those identifying LSC, and discuss why identification and targeting of this important cellular subpopulation in AML remains challenging.