Search

Background and Purpose— Four percent to 10% of patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) have a stroke or die within 1 week of their diagnosis. This national survey examined Canadian neurologists’ current practice for managing TIA, the need for a clinical decision rule to identify high-risk patients, and the required sensitivity of such a rule. Methods— We surveyed 650 neurologists registered in a national physician directory. We used a modified Dillman technique with a prenotification letter and up to 5 survey attempts using a mailed letter. Neurologists were asked 33 questions about demographics, current management of adult patients with TIA, if a clinical decision rule is required to identify high-risk patients with TIA for impending stroke/death, and the required sensitivity of this rule. Results— We had a response rate of 49.8% (324 of 650). Respondents were 78.3% male and had a mean age of 50.3 years. Of respondents, 49.2% (95% CI: 45.3% to 53.1%) reported using an existing clinical tool to risk-stratify patients. Overall, 95.0% (95% CI: 93.3% to 96.7%) reported they would consider using a sensitive, validated clinical decision rule for risk-stratifying patients with TIA. The median required sensitivity of a rule was 92% (interquartile range, 90 to 95). Conclusions— We found that Canadian neurologists would use a highly sensitive clinical decision rule to risk-stratify patients with TIA. The median required sensitivity of 92% is higher than the high risk category of any existing tool. Our results indicate a clinical decision rule to predict high-risk TIA needs to be more sensitive than the currently available rules.

Electronic medical records are becoming an integral part of healthcare delivery.The goal of this study was to compare paper documentation versus electronic medical record for non-traumatic chest pain to determine differences in time for physicians to complete medical records using paper versus electronic mediums. We also assessed physician satisfaction with the electronic format.We conducted this before-after study in a single large tertiary care academic emergency department. In the 'Before Period', stopwatches determined the time for paper medical recording. In the 'After Period', a template-based electronic medical record was introduced and the time for electronic recording was measured. The time to record in the before and after periods were compared using a two-sided t test. We surveyed physicians to assess satisfaction.We enrolled 100 non-traumatic patients with chest pain in the before period and 73 in the after period. The documentation time was longer using electronic charting, (9.6±5.9 min vs 6.1±2.5 min; p0.001). 18 of 20 physicians participating in the after period completed surveys. Physicians were not satisfied with the electronic patient recording for non-traumatic chest pain.This is the first study that we are aware of which compared paper versus electronic medical records in the emergency department. Electronic recording took longer than paper records. Physicians were not satisfied using this electronic record. Given the time pressures on emergency physicians, a solution to minimise the charting time using electronic medical records must be found before widespread uptake of electronic charting will be possible.

Background:Previously all subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients were admitted, whereas now patients with angiography may be discharged.Objective:To survey neurosurgeons to determine current practice and what constitutes a clinically significant subarachnoid hemorrhage.Methods:We surveyed all neurosurgeons listed in the Canadian Medical Directory. We used a modified Dillman technique with up to five mailed surveys plus a pre-notification letter. Neurosurgeons rated the significance of 13 scenarios of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Scenarios varied from aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage to patients with isolated xanthochromia in cerebrospinal fluid. Each scenario was rated for clinical significance using a 5-point scale [1(always) to 5(never)].Results:Of the 224 surveyed, 115 neurosurgeons responded. Scenarios with aneurysms requiring intervention, arteriovenous malformations, death or any surgical intervention all had median responses of 1 (IQR 1, 1). Scenarios having xanthochromia and few red blood cells in cerebrospinal fluid with negative computerized tomogram (CT) and angiography had median responses of 3 (IQR 1, 4). Scenarios with perimesencephalic pattern on CT with negative angiography had median of 3 (IQR 2, 4). Scenarios where patient is discharged from the emergency department had median of 4 (IQR 3, 5).Conclusion:Subarachnoid hemorrhages due to aneurysms or arteriovenous malformations causing death or requiring surgical intervention are always clinically significant. Other types of nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhages had inconsistent ratings for clinical significance. These survey results highlight the need for further discussions to standardize the diagnosis of what constitutes a clinically significant subarachnoid hemorrhage and what care should be afforded to these patients.