Search

Adjuvant therapy; Breast cancer; Olaparib Terapia adyuvante; Cáncer de mama; Olaparib Teràpia adjuvant; Càncer de mama; Olaparib Background The randomized, double-blind OlympiA trial compared 1 year of the oral poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, olaparib, to matching placebo as adjuvant therapy for patients with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 (gBRCA1/2pv) and high-risk, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, early breast cancer (EBC). The first pre-specified interim analysis (IA) previously demonstrated statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS). The olaparib group had fewer deaths than the placebo group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance for overall survival (OS). We now report the pre-specified second IA of OS with updates of IDFS, DDFS, and safety. Patients and methods One thousand eight hundred and thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to olaparib or placebo following (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation therapy if indicated. Endocrine therapy was given concurrently with study medication for hormone receptor-positive cancers. Statistical significance for OS at this IA required P < 0.015. Results With a median follow-up of 3.5 years, the second IA of OS demonstrated significant improvement in the olaparib group relative to the placebo group [hazard ratio 0.68; 98.5% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-0.97; P = 0.009]. Four-year OS was 89.8% in the olaparib group and 86.4% in the placebo group (Δ 3.4%, 95% CI −0.1% to 6.8%). Four-year IDFS for the olaparib group versus placebo group was 82.7% versus 75.4% (Δ 7.3%, 95% CI 3.0% to 11.5%) and 4-year DDFS was 86.5% versus 79.1% (Δ 7.4%, 95% CI 3.6% to 11.3%), respectively. Subset analyses for OS, IDFS, and DDFS demonstrated benefit across major subgroups. No new safety signals were identified including no new cases of acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Conclusion With 3.5 years of median follow-up, OlympiA demonstrates statistically significant improvement in OS with adjuvant olaparib compared with placebo for gBRCA1/2pv-associated EBC and maintained improvements in the previously reported, statistically significant endpoints of IDFS and DDFS with no new safety signals. Funding for this work, which was conducted as a collaborative partnership among the Breast International Group, NRG Oncology, Frontier Science, AstraZeneca, and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, U.S.A. (MSD), was provided by the National Institutes of Health (grant numbers: U10CA 180868, UG1CA 189867, and U10CA 180822) and by AstraZeneca as part of an alliance between AstraZeneca and MSD. Provision of olaparib and placebo was from AstraZeneca.

Supplementary Data; Supplementary Tables S1-S2.

Purpose: Brivanib, a selective dual inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor and VEGF signaling, has demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity in preclinical and phase I studies. We performed a phase II open-label study of brivanib as first-line therapy in patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma.Experimental Design: Brivanib was administered orally at a dose of 800 mg once daily. The primary objective was 6-month progression-free survival, progression-free survival rate; secondary objectives were tumor response rate, time to response, duration of response, median progression-free survival, median overall survival, disease control rate (complete response, partial response, or stable disease ≥ 42 days), and safety and tolerability.Results: Between March 2007 and May 2009, 55 patients were treated and were evaluable for response. Patients were assessed using modified World Health Organization (mWHO) criteria. According to mWHO criteria and as assessed by Independent Response Review Committee, the six-month progression-free survival rate (95% CI) was 18.2% (9.1%–30.9%). Median progression-free survival (95% CI) was 2.7 months (1.4–3.0). One patient achieved a complete response and three achieved a partial response. Twenty-two had stable disease. Median overall survival (95% CI) was 10 (6.8–15.2) months. Brivanib was generally well tolerated; the most common adverse events included fatigue, hypertension, and diarrhea.Conclusion: Brivanib as first-line therapy demonstrates promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced, unresectable HCC. Clin Cancer Res; 17(7); 1973–83. ©2011 AACR.

Supplementary Table from Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Previously Untreated Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Data from the Open-Label, Phase II KEYNOTE-224 Trial

Supplementary Data from Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Previously Untreated Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Data from the Open-Label, Phase II KEYNOTE-224 Trial

Supplementary Figure from Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Previously Untreated Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Data from the Open-Label, Phase II KEYNOTE-224 Trial

Purpose:KEYNOTE-224 cohort 1 demonstrated that pembrolizumab was efficacious and tolerable in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) previously treated with sorafenib. We report results from KEYNOTE-224 (NCT02702414) cohort 2, which enrolled patients with advanced HCC and no prior systemic therapy.Patients and Methods:KEYNOTE-224 was an open-label, multicountry phase II trial. Eligible patients in cohort 2 had advanced HCC not amenable or refractory to locoregional therapy and not previously treated with systemic therapy. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for ≤2 years. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by central imaging review per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety/tolerability.Results:Between September 4, 2018, and February 20, 2019, 51 patients were allocated in cohort 2. The median time from the first dose to data cutoff (January 19, 2021) was 27 months (range, 23–29). ORR was 16% [95% confidence interval (CI), 7–29] and was similar across key subgroups. Median DOR was 16 months (range, 3–24+), and DCR was 57%. The median PFS was 4 months (95% CI, 2–8), and median TTP was 4 months (95% CI, 3–9). Median OS was 17 months (95% CI, 8–23). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 16% of patients.Conclusions:In patients with advanced HCC with no prior systemic therapy, pembrolizumab provided durable antitumor activity, promising OS, and had a safety profile consistent with previous observations. These findings support further evaluation of pembrolizumab-based regimens for HCC.

Purpose: KEYNOTE-224 cohort 1 demonstrated that pembrolizumab was efficacious and tolerable in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) previously treated with sorafenib. We report results from KEYNOTE-224 (NCT02702414) cohort 2, which enrolled patients with advanced HCC and no prior systemic therapy. Patients and Methods: KEYNOTE-224 was an open-label, multicountry phase II trial. Eligible patients in cohort 2 had advanced HCC not amenable or refractory to locoregional therapy and not previously treated with systemic therapy. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for ≤2 years. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by central imaging review per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety/tolerability. Results: Between September 4, 2018, and February 20, 2019, 51 patients were allocated in cohort 2. The median time from the first dose to data cutoff (January 19, 2021) was 27 months (range, 23–29). ORR was 16% [95% confidence interval (CI), 7–29] and was similar across key subgroups. Median DOR was 16 months (range, 3–24+), and DCR was 57%. The median PFS was 4 months (95% CI, 2–8), and median TTP was 4 months (95% CI, 3–9). Median OS was 17 months (95% CI, 8–23). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 16% of patients. Conclusions: In patients with advanced HCC with no prior systemic therapy, pembrolizumab provided durable antitumor activity, promising OS, and had a safety profile consistent with previous observations. These findings support further evaluation of pembrolizumab-based regimens for HCC.

BACKGROUND & AIMS Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common complication of chronic liver disease with diverse underlying aetiologies. REACH/REACH-2 were global phase III studies investigating ramucirumab in advanced HCC (aHCC) following sorafenib treatment. We performed an exploratory analysis of outcomes by liver disease aetiology and baseline serum viral load. METHODS Meta-analysis was conducted in patients with aHCC and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥400 ng/mL (N = 542) from REACH/REACH-2 trials. Individual patient-level data were pooled with results reported by aetiology subgroup (hepatitis B [HBV] or C [HCV] and Other). Pre-treatment serum HBV DNA and HCV RNA were quantified using Roche COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model (stratified by study). RESULTS Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between arms in each subgroup (HBV: N = 225, HCV: N = 127, Other: N = 190). No significant difference in treatment effect by aetiology subgroup was detected (OS interaction P-value = .23). Median OS (ramucirumab vs placebo) in months was 7.7 versus 4.5 (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-0.99) for HBV, 8.2 versus 5.5 (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.55-1.23) for HCV and 8.5 versus 5.4 (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.79) for Other. Ramucirumab showed similar overall safety profiles across subgroups. Worst outcomes were noted in patients with a detectable HBV load. Use of HBV antiviral therapy, irrespective of viral load, was beneficial for survival, liver function and liver-specific adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Ramucirumab improved survival across aetiology subgroups with a tolerable safety profile, supporting its use in patients with aHCC and elevated AFP.

Purpose This study aimed to elucidate the patient experience of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to guide patient-centered outcome measurement in drug development. Methods Patients with HCC participated in qualitative interviews to elicit disease-related signs/symptoms and impacts, using discussion guides developed from literature searches and discussions with oncologists. Interview participants rated the disturbance of their experiences (0–10 scale). A conceptual model was developed and mapped against patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments identified from database reviews. Results Interviews were conducted with 25 individuals with HCC (68% were men; median age: 63 years; 12% Barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage A; 32% stage B; and 56% stage C) in the USA. Fifty-one HCC-related concepts were identified from the interviews and were grouped into eight sign/symptom categories (eating behavior/weight changes; extremities [arms, legs]; fatigue and strength; gastrointestinal; pain; sensory; skin; other) and four impact categories (emotional; physical; cognitive function; other) for the conceptual model. The most prevalent and disturbing experiences across the disease stages were fatigue/lack of energy and emotional impacts such as frustration, fear, and depression. Abdominal pain and skin-related issues were particularly common and disturbing in individuals with HCC stage C. The EORTC QLQ-C30 and HCC18 were identified as commonly used PRO instruments in HCC studies and captured the relevant signs/symptoms associated with the patient experience. Conclusion Patients with HCC reported a range of signs/symptoms and impacts that negatively affect daily functioning and quality of life. Including PRO measures in HCC clinical trials can provide meaningful patient perspectives during drug development.

4109 Background: Pembrolizumab monotherapy showed durable antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with sorafenib-treated (cohort 1) and treatment-naive (cohort 2) aHCC in the open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-224 (NCT02702414) study. Longer term data from KEYNOTE-224 after ̃3 years of follow-up for patients with treatment-naive aHCC are reported. Methods: Eligible patients in cohort 2 had histologically, cytologically, or radiologically confirmed aHCC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C or B not amenable or refractory to locoregional therapy and not amenable to curative treatment, Child-Pugh A liver function, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR), and ECOG PS 0 or 1. Patients received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for ≤35 cycles (̃2 years). Primary end point was ORR assessed per RECIST v1.1 by BICR. Secondary end points included DOR, DCR, TTP, and PFS, all assessed per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, OS, and safety/tolerability. Results: All 51 patients enrolled in cohort 2 received ≥1 dose of pembrolizumab. Median follow-up, defined as the time from first dose to the data cutoff (October 1, 2021), was 35 months (range, 31-37). ORR was 16% (95% CI, 7-29). Median DOR was not reached (NR; range, 3 to 24+ months); 58% of responders were estimated to have a response duration ≥18 months. Best overall response was 8 (16%) PRs, 21 (41%) SDs, and 17 (33%) PDs; no CRs were observed and response was not evaluable for 2 patients (4%) and not assessed for 3 patients (6%). DCR was 57% (95% CI, 42-71). ORR was generally consistent among patients with a viral and nonviral etiology for HCC, although sample sizes were small. The median TTP was 4 months (95% CI, 3-9). Median PFS was 4 months (95% CI, 2-8). Estimated PFS rate at 24 months was 15%. Median OS was 17 months (95% CI, 8-23). Estimated OS rate at 24 months was 34%. No new or unexpected adverse events (AEs) occurred. Treatment-related AEs were reported in 28 patients (55%; grade 3-5, 8 [16%]). Conclusions: Updated results from cohort 2 of the KEYNOTE-224 study continued to demonstrate durable antitumor activity, promising OS, and manageable safety for pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with aHCC and no prior systemic therapy. These data, together with recent positive results from KEYNOTE-394, underscore the broad applicability of pembrolizumab in patients with aHCC both as monotherapy and in combination with other therapies. Clinical trial information: NCT02702414.

Summary Background Immune checkpoint blockade therapy has shown promising results in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in this patient population. Methods KEYNOTE-224 is a non-randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial that is set in 47 medical centres and hospitals across ten countries. Eligible patients had pathologically confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma; had previously been treated with sorafenib and were either intolerant to this treatment or showed radiographic progression of their disease after treatment; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1; adequate organ function, and were Child-Pugh class A. Participants received 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously every 3 weeks for about 2 years or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient withdrawal, or investigator decision. The primary endpoint was objective response, defined as the proportion of patients with complete or partial response in all patients who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab, which was radiologically confirmed by use of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 by central review. Safety was also assessed in all treated patients. This trial is ongoing but closed to enrolment and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02702414. Findings Between June 7, 2016, and Feb 9, 2017, we screened 169 patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, of whom 104 eligible patients were enrolled and treated. As of data cutoff on Feb 13, 2018, 17 (16%) patients were still receiving pembrolizumab. We recorded an objective response in 18 (17%; 95% CI 11–26) of 104 patients. The best overall responses were one (1%) complete and 17 (16%) partial responses; meanwhile, 46 (44%) patients had stable disease, 34 (33%) had progressive disease, and six (6%) patients who did not have a post-baseline assessment on the cutoff date were considered not to be assessable. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 76 (73%) of 104 patients, which were serious in 16 (15%) patients. Grade 3 treatment-related events were reported in 25 (24%) of the 104 patients; the most common were increased aspartate aminotransferase concentration in seven (7%) patients, increased alanine aminotransferase concentration in four (4%) patients, and fatigue in four (4%) patients. One (1%) grade 4 treatment-related event of hyperbilirubinaemia occurred. One death associated with ulcerative oesophagitis was attributed to treatment. Immune-mediated hepatitis occurred in three (3%) patients, but there were no reported cases of viral flares. Interpretation Pembrolizumab was effective and tolerable in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who had previously been treated with sorafenib. These results indicate that pembrolizumab might be a treatment option for these patients. This drug is undergoing further assessment in two phase 3, randomised trials as a second-line treatment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Funding Merck & Co, Inc.

Summary Background CLEOPATRA was a phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel with placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. In the primary analysis and subsequent reports, progression-free and overall survival were significantly improved in the pertuzumab group compared with the placebo group. Here, we report the end-of-study analysis of CLEOPATRA. Methods This was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial that was done at 204 centres in 25 countries. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, had HER2-positive, metastatic breast cancer, had not received previous chemotherapy or biological treatment for their metastatic disease, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. All study drugs were given intravenously, every 3 weeks. Patients were assigned to receive either pertuzumab or placebo at a loading dose of 840 mg, and 420 mg thereafter; plus trastuzumab at 8 mg/kg loading dose and 6 mg/kg thereafter; and docetaxel at 75 mg/m2, escalating to 100 mg/m2 if tolerated. Pertuzumab or placebo and trastuzumab were given until disease progression; docetaxel was given for six cycles, or longer at the investigators’ discretion. Randomisation (1:1) was done by use of an interactive voice-response system and was stratified by geographical region (Asia, Europe, North America, or South America) and previous treatment (previous adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs none). The primary endpoint was independent review facility-assessed progression-free survival, which has been reported previously. Since the confirmatory overall survival analysis had also occurred before this prespecified end-of-study analysis, analyses presented here are descriptive. Overall survival analyses were based on the intention-to-treat population with crossover patients analysed in the placebo group; analyses were not adjusted for crossover to the pertuzumab group and are likely to be conservative. Safety analyses were based on treatment received; crossover patients were counted in the placebo group up to the day before first pertuzumab dose. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00567190 . Findings Between Feb 12, 2008, and July 7, 2010, 1196 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 808 were enrolled and randomly assigned. 402 patients were assigned to receive docetaxel plus trastuzumab plus pertuzumab, and 406 patients were assigned to receive docetaxel plus trastuzumab plus placebo. Clinical cutoff for this analysis was Nov 23, 2018. Between July 2012 and clinical cutoff, 50 patients crossed from the placebo to the pertuzumab group. Median follow-up was 99·9 months in the pertuzumab group (IQR 92·9–106·4) and 98·7 months (90·9–105·7) in the placebo group. Median overall survival was 57·1 months (95% CI 50–72) in the pertuzumab group and 40·8 months (36–48) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·69, 95% CI 0·58–0·82); 8-year landmark overall survival rates were 37% (95% CI 31–42) in the pertuzumab group and 23% (19–28) in the placebo group. The most common grade 3–4 adverse event was neutropenia (200 [49%] of 408 patients in the pertuzumab group, 183 [46%] of 396 patients in the placebo group). Five (1%) of 408 patients in the pertuzumab group and six (2%) of 396 patients in the placebo group had treatment-related deaths. One new serious adverse event suggestive of congestive heart failure (pertuzumab group) and one new symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (post-crossover) occurred since the previous analysis. Interpretation Our analysis shows that the previously observed improvements in overall survival with pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel versus placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel were maintained after a median of more than 8 years of follow-up. The long-term safety and cardiac safety profiles of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel were maintained in the overall safety population and within crossover patients. HER2-targeted therapy has changed the natural history of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, with the dual blockade of pertuzumab and trastuzumab, with docetaxel, demonstrating an 8-year landmark overall survival rate of 37%. Funding F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech.

Background: Significant progress has been made in cancer survival, however there is much room for improvement in supportive cancer care. “Chemo-brain” is the lay language that some patients use to describe a cognitive fog or mental fuzziness that they experience soon after chemotherapy (CT) and that can last more than a decade after CT has ended. In this study, we examine the notion of accelerated cognitive aging as a potential side effect of cytotoxic CT.While CCICD has been widely researched, its underlying biological mechanisms are yet to be sufficiently elucidated. The long-range goals of this study are to (a) yield clinically valid diagnostic criteria for CCICD by the identification of fine-sliced neurocognitive measures that can reliably capture within-subject, nuanced, cognitive changes pre/post CT; and (b) identify brain-based biomarkers that can leverage future systemic therapies or adjunctive medications that are neuroprotective. Trial design: The study takes advantage of greater clarity offered by high-resolution neuroimaging (7Tesla) to delve into biomarkers associated with the neurotoxic effects of the common chemotherapeutic agents doxorubicin, paclitaxel, docetaxel, and cyclophosphamide on brain metabolism and iron homeostasis, which may result in CCICD. We innovate by harnessing magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) together with quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), a trio that has rarely been combined in 7T imaging, to uncover biomarkers related to CCICD. In this high-resolution imaging environment, we hope to individually isolate and track changes in key neuronal metabolites such as glutamate and glutamine using MRS (pre- and post-CT), in a prospective, longitudinal study. At these two time-points, we simultaneously use QSM to identify regions of increased iron deposits (associated with doxorubicin) in the brain along white matter tracts as well as DTI to assess white matter degeneration.We selected fine-sliced measurements of cognitive updating, mental flexibility and impulse control, the key executive function (EF) deficits associated with CCICD. These and other global EF measures are administered pre/post-CT (within a period of 4-6 months), while assessments of depression, anxiety, sleep, and pain will be administered via a weekly online questionnaire during CT.Eligibility criteria: Eligible patients are adults (age ≥18) with either early stage HER2 negative breast cancer or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who will receive curative-intent combination CT, to include cyclophosphamide. Patients are excluded if they have a prior history of cancer diagnosis or treatment. Patients would have to be 7T MRI compatible.Specific Aims: To obtain preliminary estimates of the change in EF measures, brain metabolite, iron concentrations, and white matter degeneration in patients pre- and post-CT, to inform a subsequent larger trial.Statistical methods: The proposed sample (N=9) size achieves 74.8% power to detect a 1 SD change with a significance level of 0.05 using a two-sided, one-sample t-test for the pairwise difference. Estimates and 95% confidence intervals will be reported. Additionally, the relationship between executive function, brain metabolite, iron concentrations and white matter degeneration will be explored. Present and Target accrual: Accrual has thus far been delayed, partially due to due to COVID-19 restrictions on clinical research, beginning in March 2020. Target accrual is 9 patients.Contact information: Kanchna-ramchandran@uiowa.edu, Phone: 319-356-0535. Citation Format: Kanchna Ramchandran, Sneha Phadke, Sarah Mott, Grerk Sutamtewagul, Mark Karwal, Vince Magnotta. Fine-sliced neurocognitive assessments and high-resolution neuroimaging biomarkers to diagnose cancer- and chemotherapy-induced cognitive deficits (CCICD) - a pilot study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT-05-01.

297 Background: Results from cohort 1 of KEYNOTE-224, an open-label, single-arm, multi-country phase II trial, demonstrated that pembro monotherapy was efficacious and tolerable in patients (pts) with advanced HCC previously treated with sorafenib. Here, we report results from KEYNOTE-224 cohort 2, which enrolled pts with advanced HCC and no prior systemic therapy. Methods: Eligible pts in cohort 2 had radiologically, histologically, or cytologically confirmed, incurable HCC not amenable or refractory to locoregional therapy, Child Pugh A liver disease, measurable disease based on RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR), ECOG PS 0-1, and BCLC stage C or B. Pts received pembro 200 mg IV Q3W for ~2 years or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or investigator decision. Primary endpoint was ORR (RECIST 1.1 by BICR). Secondary endpoints included DOR, DCR, TTP, PFS, OS, and safety/tolerability. Response was assessed every 9 weeks. Efficacy and safety were assessed in pts who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. DOR was assessed in responders. The estimate and 95% CI of the ORR and DCR were based on the Clopper-Pearson method. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS, PFS, and DOR. A sample size of ~50 pts was chosen to provide acceptable precision for the assessment of ORR. Results: Cohort 2 enrolled 51 pts. The median time from the first dose to data cutoff (July 31, 2020) was 21 (range, 17-23) mo. The median age of pts was 68 (range, 41-91) years, one pt was HBV+, 80% had alcohol use, 8% were HCV+, 18% had vascular invasion, 35% had extrahepatic disease, 33% had BCLC Stage B disease, and 67% had BCLC Stage C HCC. ORR was 16% (95% CI, 7-29) and was similar across most subgroups. Median DOR was not reached (range, 3-20+ mo); 70% were estimated to have response duration ≥12 mo. Best overall responses were 0 CR, 8 (16%) PRs, 21 (41%) SDs, and 17 (33%) PDs; response was not evaluable or not assessed for 5 (10%) pts. DCR was 57%. The median TTP was 4 (95% CI, 3-8) mo. The median PFS was 4 (95% CI, 2-6) mo, and median OS was 17 (95% CI, 8-NA) mo. PFS rate at 18 mo was 16%, and OS rate at 18 mo was 46%. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 27 (53%) pts; the most common TRAEs were diarrhea, fatigue, hypothyroidism, and myalgia. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 7 (14%) pts. TRAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 6% of pts. Immune-mediated AEs and infusion reactions occurred in 11 (22%) pts. One treatment-related death occurred due to myocarditis, with associated immune-related hepatitis. Conclusions: In pts with advanced HCC and no prior systemic therapy, pembro monotherapy provided durable anti-tumor activity, promising overall survival, and demonstrated a safety profile consistent with that previously observed for pembro in advanced HCC. These findings support further evaluation of pembro-based regimens for the treatment of HCC in the frontline setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02702414.

501 Background: There have been global efforts to manage hepatobiliary malignancies such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a multidisciplinary setting under the concept of transplant oncology. We published preliminary data of hepatology-directed treatment of HCC (Ann Hepatol 2019). However, the actual role of hepatologists in this setting is not well defined. Methods: We evaluated 107 patients with newly diagnosed HCC, undergoing locoregional therapy (LRT) as a first therapy (microwave ablation, TACE, TARE or SBRT) in our institution between 1/2017 to 2/2019 and being followed until 8/2019. Patients were divided into three groups based on referral pathways: outside referral directly to oncologists (O-group, n=24), internal referral from hepatologists to oncologists (H/O-group, n=62) and hepatologist directed HCC treatment (H-group, n=21). The hepatologist performed all microwave ablations in H-group; rest of the LRTs were performed by either interventional radiology or radiation oncology. Results: The baseline gender, etiology of liver disease, MELD score, Child-Pugh score, BCLC stage, CLIP score, AFP and proportion of patients within Milan criteria were similar between 3 groups ( p=n.s.). However, O-group included older patients (median 70 vs 63/62 y.o., p

528 Background: IO can cause pseudoprogression (PP): apparent tumor growth followed by stability or favorable response. We assess PP in aHCC treated with pembro (KEYNOTE-224 [ph 2], NCT02702414; KEYNOTE-240 [ph 3], NCT02702401). Methods: aHCC pts with PD on/intolerance to sorafenib received pembro 200 mg IV Q3W until unacceptable toxicity, study withdrawal, 2 y of therapy, or RECIST v1.1 PD; if pt clinically stable at PD, physician could continue therapy and repeat scans to confirm PD per irRECIST. PP=RECIST v1.1 PD then irRECIST response other than PD. Data cutoff: Jan 02, 2019 (KEYNOTE-240); Feb 13, 2018 (KEYNOTE-224). Results: 245/382 pembro-treated pts had RECIST v1.1 PD: 138 irRECIST repeat scan; 105 PD; 33 (8.6%; 33/382) outcomes other than PD. Of 33 PP, 29 had SD, 3 PR, 1 CR (irRECIST; 29 had this at first irRECIST scan; 4 [2 SD, 2 PR] at subsequent scan). For initial RECIST v1.1 PD, 16/33 PP had PD at first postbaseline scan (pembro cycles 2-4); 17/33 PP had PD at pembro cycles 4-18. Median (range) time to RECIST v1.1 PD in the 33 PP was 80 (37-378) days. OS shown in Table. KEYNOTE-240 had 135 PBO-treated pts: 8 (5.9%) PP; small samples bar meaningful interpretation. Conclusions: PP in aHCC, per irRECIST, has a similar incidence to other cancers (eg, melanoma) and does not seem to correlate with OS. Data may help physicians assess when to continue pembro after PD. Clinical trial information: NCT02702414, NCT02702401. [Table: see text]

Purpose: Brivanib, a selective dual inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor and VEGF signaling, has demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity in preclinical and phase I studies. We performed a phase II open-label study of brivanib as first-line therapy in patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. Experimental Design: Brivanib was administered orally at a dose of 800 mg once daily. The primary objective was 6-month progression-free survival, progression-free survival rate; secondary objectives were tumor response rate, time to response, duration of response, median progression-free survival, median overall survival, disease control rate (complete response, partial response, or stable disease ≥ 42 days), and safety and tolerability. Results: Between March 2007 and May 2009, 55 patients were treated and were evaluable for response. Patients were assessed using modified World Health Organization (mWHO) criteria. According to mWHO criteria and as assessed by Independent Response Review Committee, the six-month progression-free survival rate (95% CI) was 18.2% (9.1%–30.9%). Median progression-free survival (95% CI) was 2.7 months (1.4–3.0). One patient achieved a complete response and three achieved a partial response. Twenty-two had stable disease. Median overall survival (95% CI) was 10 (6.8–15.2) months. Brivanib was generally well tolerated; the most common adverse events included fatigue, hypertension, and diarrhea. Conclusion: Brivanib as first-line therapy demonstrates promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced, unresectable HCC. Clin Cancer Res; 17(7); 1973–83. ©2011 AACR.

Y-90-DOTA-Phe1-Tyr3-Octreotide (90Y-SMT 487, OctreoTher) has shown potential for effectively treating patients with neuroendocrine tumors. The dose-limiting organ for this agent is the kidney. The purpose of this work is to assess the effectiveness of a commercially available amino acid solution on reducing renal uptake of 90Y-SMT 487 and determine the safety profile of this solution. Subjects with In-111 pentetreotide positive tumors and normal creatinine levels were treated with 3 cycles of 90Y-SMT 487, 120 mCi/cycle, at 6-9 week intervals. During each treatment two liters of an amino acid solution containing arginine and lysine (Aminosyn II 7%, Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL) were infused IV over 4 hours. Adverse events were recorded. To assess the effect of Aminosyn II on renal uptake of 90Y-SMT 487, a subgroup of subjects underwent bremsstrahlung imaging 24 hours following infusion. Kidney to liver (K/L) count density ratios were generated from the baseline In-111 pentetreotide images (performed without amino acid infusion) and the 90Y bremsstrahlung images. Follow-up creatinine levels were obtained. Thirty-seven subjects received a total of 89 90Y-SMT 487 treatments. The number of amino-acid infusions associated with one or more episodes of emesis was 53 (62%). During 13 (15%) of these infusions, the Aminosyn II rate had to be reduced because of severe nausea and vomiting. Symptomatic flushing occurred during 16 (18%) of the infusions. One subject experienced a near syncopal event shortly after completing the infusion. Creatinine levels remained normal in 34 of 36 subjects during a mean follow-up period of 9.8 months. Fourteen subjects underwent bremsstrahlung imaging following infusion of 90Y-SMT 487. Kidney uptake appeared to decrease with administration of the amino acid solution in 13 of 14 subjects. For the 28 individual kidneys, the mean percent decrease in the Kidney/Liver uptake ratio with the amino acid solution was found to be 32%. We conclude that 2 L of Aminosyn II 7% infused over 4 hours appears to notably reduce renal uptake of 90Y-SMT 487. Aminosyn is generally well tolerated, particularly at lower infusion rates with occasional moderate to severe nausea and vomiting at higher rates.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is evidence for hepatocellular radiation injury following treatment with (90)Y-SMT487 ((90)Y-DOTA-tyr3-octreotide, OctreoTher(TM)) in patients with extensive liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors. Patients reported in this study participated in a Phase II trial of efficacy and safety of (90)Y-SMT487. The trial design called for three treatment cycles of 120 mCi each (4400 MBq) of (90)Y-SMT487. (111)In-pentetreotide SPECT images were used to determine the extent of liver metastases. Serum AST, ALT, and alkaline phosphatase levels were obtained at baseline and following each cycle of therapy. Least squares fit was applied to the serial liver enzyme measurements in patients with extensive liver metastases. Post-therapy liver enzyme measurements were also evaluated using WHO common toxicity criteria. Repeated-measures ANOVA and paired t-test were applied to the serial enzyme measures. There were 21 subjects. Fifteen of these had hepatic metastases with 12 demonstrating extensive (defined as 25% or more) liver involvement. In only 4 of these 15 did any of the three enzyme levels increase in WHO toxicity grade from baseline to final follow-up. We conclude that patients with diffuse SSTR positive hepatic metastases can be treated with a cumulative administered activity of 360 mCi (90)Y-SMT487 with only a small chance of developing mild acute or subacute hepatic radiation injury.

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with rapid disease relapse after neo/adjuvant chemotherapy including anthracyclines and taxanes have limited treatment options and their efficacy is marginal. Two phase III studies compared ixabepilone plus capecitabine vs. capecitabine alone as first-line treatment in MBC patients pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes in the neo/adjuvant setting. Here we report the efficacy and safety of these treatments in a prespecified subset of patients whose disease relapsed within 12 months.Of 1973 patients across two studies, 293 relapsed within 12 months of neo/adjuvant treatment and received ixabepilone plus capecitabine (n = 149) or capecitabine alone (n = 144) as first-line chemotherapy for MBC. Analysis included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and toxicity.In 293 patients, ixabepilone plus capecitabine, as compared to capecitabine alone, increased PFS (median: 5.6 months vs. 2.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.58; p0.0001), ORR (46% vs. 24%) and OS (median: 15.1 months vs. 12.5 months; hazard ratio, 0.84; p = 0.208). Major toxicities of this regimen included neuropathy, neutropenia and hand-foot syndrome, but were manageable.Patients with breast cancer with early relapse following neo/adjuvant treatment with anthracyclines and taxanes may benefit from ixabepilone plus capecitabine. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00080301 and NCT00082433.).

BACKGROUND: UFT, a combination of uracil and ftorafur, was developed to combine the cytotoxic effects of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with convenient oral dosing. Leucovorin is combined with UFT to further potentiate the effect of 5-FU on tumor cells. Orally administered UFT and leucovorin provide higher peak plasma concentrations of 5-FU and prolonged therapeutic 5-FU concentrations compared with continuous infusion of 5-FU. METHODS: Ninety-four patients with metastatic breast cancer who had been previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes were treated with UFT and leucovorin, given orally, for the first 28 days of a 35-day cycle. The total daily dose of UFT was 300 mg/m2, which was given in 2 divided doses every 12 hours. The primary endpoint was time to disease progression (TTP). Secondary objectives included overall tumor response rate (OR = complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of the 94 patients enrolled, 68 were evaluable for efficacy. Although no CRs were observed, 9 patients achieved PRs, for an OR of 13.2% in the evaluable population. The median TTP for the evaluable population was 10.3 weeks, and the proportion of patients free of disease progression at 6 months was 17%. The median OS was 61.6 weeks for all patients enrolled. The most common drug-related ≥ grade 3 adverse events (graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria version 2) were diarrhea, asthenia, nausea, and dehydration. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of UFT and leucovorin administered orally in a twice-daily regimen was found to have modest activity. Grade 3 toxicities were manageable with appropriate dose adjustments in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Because of the presence of cell membrane somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), many neuroendocrine tumors will bind analogs of somatostatin. (90)Y-Dodecanetetraacetic acid-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide (SMT 487) is an SSTR radiopharmaceutical currently under investigation as a therapeutic option for neuroendocrine tumors. Although there are a variety of methods for evaluating response to a given cancer therapy, an important indicator of success is the impact on the clinical status of the patient. The purpose of this work was to develop a semiquantitative method and assess the clinical effectiveness of (90)Y-SMT 487 therapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumors.A scoring system was developed to evaluate clinical response that included the following parameters: weight, health status score (determined by the patient), Karnofsky score, and tumor-related symptoms.We applied this scoring system to 21 patients who had completed 3 cycles of therapy with (90)Y-SMT 487. Fourteen of the 21 showed a favorable clinical response, whereas 5 were clinically stable after treatment and 2 showed evidence of clinical progression. There was also a significant reduction in the amount of octreotide being used after completion of (90)Y-SMT 487 therapy in the 20 patients who were on this medication.Using this scoring method, (90)Y-SMT 487 appears effective in improving the clinical status of patients with (111)In-pentetreotide-positive neuroendocrine tumors.

Amyloidosis results from abnormal protein deposition and accumulation in extracellular spaces. The multiple distinct forms of this disease have heterogeneous clinical manifestations and variable patterns of organ involvement. Amyloidosis might be hereditary or acquired, localized, or systemic and can range from an incidental asymptomatic finding to a lethal disorder. The diseases are distinguished on a molecular level by the type of peptide subunits that compose abnormally accumulated protein fibrils. Although these peptide fibrils differ, all amyloid fibrils adopt a similar ultrastructure rich in -sheet content. The fibril deposits also have a common association with certain glycosaminoglycans (GAGs), notably heparin and dermatan sulphate. Normal plasma proteins, such as serum amyloid P (SAP), function to stabilize the amyloid fibril. We present a case of severe tracheobronchial amyloidosis (TBA) with the results of our evaluation and management strategies.

569 Background: REACH (NCT01140347) and REACH-2 (NCT02435433) were global, randomized, blinded, placebo (PL)-controlled phase 3 trials of ramucirumab (RAM) in pts with advanced HCC following sorafenib. REACH-2 limited enrollment to pts with AFP ≥400 ng/mL, and met its primary OS endpoint, consistent with the prespecified REACH subgroup with baseline AFP ≥400 ng/mL. Analysis of pooled individual pt data from REACH (AFP ≥400 ng/mL) and REACH-2 showed improved OS with RAM vs PL for pts with hepatitis B virus (HBV) etiology (7.7 vs 4.5 mos; HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55, 0.99). Here we investigate survival and liver function in REACH-2 pts with HBV etiology tested for serum HBV DNA. Methods: Pts had advanced HCC, Child-Pugh A, ECOG PS 0/1, AFP ≥400 ng/mL, prior sorafenib treatment, and were randomized (2:1) to receive RAM 8 mg/kg or PL Q2W. Pretreatment serum HBV DNA was quantified by HBV-specific PCR (Roche) by a central lab. HBV DNA > 15 IU/mL were detectable (HBV DNA+), < 15 IU/mL were undetectable (HBV DNA-). OS in pooled treatment arms was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. Liver function was assessed at baseline and before each cycle with the ALBI linear predictor. Outcomes were assessed by concomitant antiviral therapy. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Results: Of 107 REACH-2 pts with HBV etiology, 106 had available PCR samples and were included in a pooled analysis (70 RAM and 36 PL pts). 48 pts were HBV DNA+ and 58 pts were HBV DNA-. HBV DNA+ pts had poorer median OS vs HBV DNA- pts (5.3 vs 10.1 mos, unstratified HR 1.45 95% CI 0.93, 2.28). HBV DNA+ pts taking concomitant antiviral therapy (n = 36) had numerically improved OS compared with those without (n = 12) (5.8 vs 4.0 mos). No difference in OS was noted for HBV DNA- pts by antiviral therapy use (n = 39 antiviral; n = 19 no antiviral) (10.2 vs 9.7 mos for yes vs no antiviral). In pts taking antiviral therapy, regardless of HBV DNA serology, liver function was improved and liver injury/failure related AEs were less frequent. Conclusions: Our data reinforce the use of antiviral therapy to improve outcomes in pts with advanced HBV-associated HCC and elevated AFP. Clinical trial information: NCT02435433.