Search

PURPOSE: To report long term follow-up of the efficacy of subtotal prostate ablation using a “hockey-stick” template, including oncologic control and quality of life (QoL) impact. METHODS: We performed a prospective controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of subtotal prostate ablation in selected men with baseline and confirmatory biopsy showing grade group (GG) 1–2 prostate cancer. “Hockey-stick” cryoablation that included the ipsilateral hemi-gland and contralateral anterior prostate was performed. Prostate biopsies and QOL queries were performed at 6, 18 and 36 months following regional ablation, and follow-up was updated to include subsequent clinic visits. RESULTS: Between August 2009 and January 2012, 72 men were screened for eligibility and 47 opted to undergo confirmatory biopsy. Of these, 23 were deemed eligible and treated with regional cryoablation. Median age was 64 years. Median follow-up was 74 months. A single patient had

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Organ preserving therapies are of particular interest in the treatment of localized prostate cancer (PC) with a goal of decreasing morbidity associated with radical treat...

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES:Patients undergoing cystectomy continue to have poor outcomes despite multiple interventions to enhance recovery. Risk factors for poor recovery are limited and patients...

312 Background: Sitra is a spectrum-selective receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets TAM receptors (TYRO3, AXL, MERTK), VEGFR2, c-Kit, and MET. These receptors regulate several immune suppressive cell types in the tumor microenvironment, including M2-polarized macrophages, MDSCs, and T regulatory cells, which are implicated in resistance to checkpoint inhibitors. ccRCC is characterized by upregulation of VEGF and overexpression of MET and AXL. Sitra may combine effectively with immune checkpoint inhibition to augment antitumor activity in ccRCC. About 39% of patients with accRCC who receive surgery with curative intent relapse representing an unmet need in this setting. Together these data support the evaluation of neoadjuvant sitra with nivo in accRCC. Methods: This phase II study (NCT03680521) evaluated sitra and nivo in pts with locally- advanced ccRCC who were candidates for curative nephrectomy. Single-agent sitra (120 mg) was administered daily (QD) for 2 weeks, with nivo (240 mg intravenously Q2W) added to sitra for 4-6 weeks. A plan for potential dose de-escalation was implemented using a modified toxicity probability interval method with a maximum toxicity of 20% at the tolerated dose. Pts underwent pathology/tissue evaluation at 3 timepoints: biopsy prior to treatment, biopsy prior to the addition of nivo, and nephrectomy specimen evaluation at time of nephrectomy. The primary endpoint was objective response (RECIST 1.1); secondary endpoints included safety, PK, and correlative immune effects (selected protein and gene expression and immune cell populations). Results: A total of 20 pts were evaluated for safety (95% had T3 or higher stage tumors, 65% with baseline hypertension). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) led to a dose de-escalation, resulting in 7 pts treated at 120 mg QD sitra and 13 pts treated at 80 mg QD. DLTs included grade 3 (Gr3) hypertension (n=6); deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (Gr3) were observed in 1 additional pt. Median duration of sitra treatment was 6.3 weeks at the 80 mg dose and 7.1 weeks at the 120 mg dose. With a median follow-up of 9.4 months after initiation of systemic therapy, no pts have relapsed. In 17 pts evaluable for efficacy, the investigator-assessed confirmed ORR was 11.8%, including 2 PRs (33.3% ORR in pts who received 120 mg sitra). No pts experienced progressive disease while on therapy. Median DFS was not reached. There was 1 delayed surgery due to nivo-related thyroiditis that resolved. Reported TRAEs: Gr1/Gr2 in 55% of pts (dysphonia 50%, fatigue 45%, diarrhea 40%, hypertension 30%, increased ALT 30%), Gr3 in 45% of pts (hypertension 30%). There were no Gr4/Gr5 TRAEs. Correlative blood and tissue analyses will be presented. Conclusions: The combination of sitra and nivo is clinically active with a manageable safety profile as a neoadjuvant therapy for accRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03680521 .

622 Background: We aimed to explore the salivary proteomic profile (SPP) of patients undergoing surgery for suspected renal cell carcinoma (RCC), then evaluate any significant findings in a validation cohort. Methods: Prospective IRB approved trial of consecutive patients with suspected RCC undergoing curative surgery. Saliva was collected pre- and postoperatively, and from healthy volunteers. Saliva was mixed with sodium orthovanadate and protease inhibitor, aliquoted, and frozen at -80oC. SPP performed using biomarker concentrated saliva via core-shell hydrogel nanoparticles functionalized with molecular baits coupled to high resolution MS/MS electrospray mass spectrometry analysis; output represented as spectral counts. Wilcoxon Rank Sum test was used for comparisons; p-values were adjusted using false discovery rate (FDR) for multiple testing. Results: Exploratory phase: saliva was collected from 27 volunteers and 34 RCC patients (24 clear cell (cc)RCC, 6 chromophobe (ch)RCC, 4 other). Evaluation of cc vs chRCC revealed differential counts for 56 proteins; none were significant after adjustment by FDR. Comparison of matched pre/post-operative SPP in 14 ccRCC patients identified differential counts of 3 proteins: basic salivary proline-rich protein 3 precursor; prolactin-inducible protein precursor; and submaxillary gland androgen-regulated protein 3B precursor. These were not affected by patient age, partial/radical nephrectomy, or tumor size/stage/grade. Validation phase: power analyses indicated a sample size of 38/53 patients = 90% power = effect size of 0.6/0.5, respectively, 2-sided Type 1 error of 0.025. 49 ccRCC patients were enrolled with pre/postop saliva. 611 proteins were identified; none had differential counts after FDR. Conclusions: Using a unique biomarker technology coupled to high resolution MS, interesting SPP’s were seen between RCC subtypes and before/after ccRCC curative resection. We were unable to show significant differences in pre/post-op levels. More research is needed to further study the SPP in RCC patients and the factors impacting their differential expression. In order to aid such efforts, the raw data will be made available for future researchers.

Background Previous studies have shown a modest impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on primary renal tumors. Those studies were mostly retrospective or heterogeneous in their eligibility criteria with regard to histology, disease stage, duration of therapy, and time off therapy prior to surgery. Objective To prospectively investigate the safety and efficacy of axitinib in downsizing tumors in patients with nonmetastatic biopsy-proven clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Design, setting, and participants This was a single-institution, single-arm phase 2 clinical trial. Patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic biopsy-proven ccRCC were eligible. Intervention Patients received axitinib 5mg for up to 12 wk. Axitinib was continued until 36h prior to surgery. Patients underwent partial or radical nephrectomy after axitinib therapy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The primary outcome was objective response rate prior to surgery. Secondary outcomes included safety, tolerability, and quality of life. A dedicated radiologist independently reviewed all computed tomography scans to evaluate for response using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Results and limitations A total of 24 patients were treated. Twenty-two patients continued axitinib for 12 wk; 1 patient continued axitinib for 11 wk and underwent surgery as planned. One patient stopped treatment at 7 wk due to adverse events (AEs). Median reduction of primary renal tumor diameter was 28.3%. Eleven patients experienced a partial response per RECIST; 13 had stable disease. There was no progression of disease while on axitinib. The most common AEs were hypertension, fatigue, oral mucositis, hypothyroidism, and hand-foot syndrome. Postoperatively, 2 grade 3 and 13 grade 2 complications were noted. No grade 4 or 5 complications occurred. Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Specific Index-15 changed over time, with quality of life worsening while on therapy, but by week 19, it was not statistically different from screening. Limitations include single-arm design and small patient numbers. Conclusions Axitinib was clinically active and reasonably well tolerated in the neoadjuvant setting in patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic ccRCC. Patient summary In this prospective clinical trial, we found that axitinib, when given prior to surgery, results in significant shrinking of kidney cancers. Larger studies are needed prior to further clinical use. Trial registration This clinical trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01263769).

441^ Background: Previous studies have shown minimal impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on primary renal tumors. In this phase II trial, we investigate the safety and role of the axitinib in downsizing tumors in patients with non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) prior to surgical resection. Methods: Patients with clinical stage T2-T3b N0 M0 biopsy-proven RCC were eligible for this study. Patients received axitinib daily for 12 weeks prior to surgery. The primary outcome was objective response rate. Secondary outcomes included safety, tolerability, feasibility of administration of axitinib and quality of life (using FKSI-15). A dedicated radiologist independently reviewed all CT scans to evaluate for response using RECIST. Results: Twenty-four patients were treated between 2011 and 2013. All patients had biopsy-proven clear cell RCC. Twenty-three patients continued axitinib for 12 weeks, and underwent surgery as planned without delay. One patient stopped treatment before 12 weeks due to adverse events (AEs) and was taken to surgery early. Median reduction of primary renal tumor size was 28.3% (range 5.3-42.9%). Eleven patients (45.8%) experienced a partial response by RECIST, and 13 patients had stable disease. There was no progression of disease while on axitinib. The most common AEs were hypertension, fatigue, oral mucositis, hypothyroidism, and hand-foot syndrome. No grade 4 AEs were observed. Intraoperatively, no complications or unusual bleeding were encountered. Postoperatively, 2 grade 3 and 13 grade 2 complications were noted, while no grade 4 or 5 complications occurred. FKSI-15 did change over time (p < 0.0001), with quality of life worsening in comparison to the screening assessment by week 7 (p = 0.0004). However, by week 19, quality of life was not found to be statistically different from screening (p = 0.3344). Conclusions: Axitinib was clinically active and well tolerated in the neoadjuvant setting in patients with locally advanced non-metastatic ccRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT01263769.

4516 Background: Previous studies have shown minimal impact of TKIs on primary renal tumor downsizing. Axitinib is a VEGFR TKI that has been recently approved for use in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In this prospective phase II trial, we sought to investigate the safety and role of axitinib in downsizing tumors in patients with non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma, prior to undergoing surgical resection. Methods: Patients with locally advanced (clinical stage T2-T3b N0 M0) biopsy-proven clear cell RCC were eligible for this phase II clinical trial. The primary outcome was objective response rate (using RECIST) following the administration of axitinib for 12 weeks prior to undergoing radical nephrectomy. Secondary outcomes included safety, tolerability, and feasibility of administration of axitinib in this patient population. Patients were given axitinib 5mg PO BID, and dose titration was allowed. Axitinib was continued until 36 hours prior to surgery. A dedicated radiologist independently reviewed all CT scans to evaluate for response using RECIST. Results: The study goal of enrolling 24 patients has been recently reached. At present, nineteen patients have completed the studies required for assessment of the primary outcome and are hereby reported. Fifteen patients were males, and four were females. Median age was 61 years (range 42-83 years). All patients had biopsy-proven clear cell RCC. All 19 patients continued axitinib for 12 weeks, and underwent surgery as planned without delay. Adverse events of any grade were: arthralgia in 6, hypothyroidism in 14, fatigue in 15, and hypertension in 16 patients. No wound complications occurred after surgery. Nine patients (47%) experienced a partial response by RECIST, and 10 patients had stable disease. There was no progression of disease while on axitinib. Conclusions: Axitinib is well tolerated in the neoadjuvant setting in patients with planned surgery for locally advanced non-metastatic clear cell RCC. The drug showed tumor downsizing activity when given for 12 weeks prior to surgery. Adverse events of any grade were common and easily manageable with routine care. Clinical trial information: NCT01263769.