Search

We evaluated outcomes of 18 patients with isolated extramedullary disease (iEMD) relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) treated with the CD19-directed CAR T cells ARI-0001 in two centers (adult and pediatric), including patients treated in the CART19-BE-01 trial and the consecutive compassionate use program. iEMD was detected by PET-CT in 78% (14/18), and/or by cerebrospinal fluid analysis in 28% (5/18). Patients received cyclophosphamide and fludarabine followed by 1 x 10(6) ARI-0001 cells/kg, initially as a single dose (first patient) and later split into three fractions (10%, 30%, and 60%). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 50% (9/18) of patients, with no cases of grade >= 3 CRS, and 1 case (6%) of grade 1 neurotoxicity. Tocilizumab was used in 6% of patients (1/18). Procedure-related mortality was 0% at 2 years. Objective responses were seen in 94% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73%-99%) of patients, with complete responses (CR) seen in 78% (95% CI: 52%-94%) of them. Progression-free and overall survival were 49% (95% CI: 30%-79%) and 61% (95% CI: 40%-92%) at 2 years. In conclusion, the use of ARI-0001 cells in patients with R/R ALL and iEMD was associated with a safety and efficacy profile that is comparable with what is observed in patients with marrow involvement and in line with other CART19 products.

Trisomy 8 (+ 8) is the most frequent trisomy in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and is associated to clinical heterogeneity and intermediate cytogenetic risk when found isolated. The presence of gene mutations in this group of patients and the prognostic significance has not been extensively analyzed. Targeted-deep sequencing was performed in a cohort of 79 MDS patients showing isolated + 8. The most frequently mutated genes were: TET2 (38%), STAG2 (34.2%), SRSF2 (29.1%) and RUNX1 (26.6%). The mutational profile identified a high risk subgroup with mutations in STAG2, SRSF2 and/or RUNX1, resulting in shorter time to acute myeloid leukemia progression (14 months while not reached in patients without these mutations, p STAG2, SRSF2 and RUNX1. Results were validated in an external cohort (n = 2 494). In summary, the mutational profile in isolated + 8 MDS patients could offer new insights for the correct management of these patients.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a hematologic malignancy that results in bone marrow failure, is the most common acute leukemia in adults. The presence of FMS-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutations is associated with a poor prognosis, making the evaluation of FLT3-inhibitors an imperative goal in clinical trials. Midostaurin was the first FLT3-inhibitor approved by the FDA and EMA for the treatment of FLT3-mutated AML, and it showed a significant improvement in overall survival for newly diagnosed patients treated with midostaurin, in combination with standard chemotherapy (RATIFY study). The main interest of midostaurin has been the FLT3-specific inhibition, but little is known about its role as a multikinase inhibitor and whether it may be used in relapse and maintenance therapy. Here, we used systems biology- and machine learning-based approaches to deepen the potential benefits of the multitarget activity of midostaurin and to better understand its anti-leukemic effect on FLT3-mutated AML. The resulting in silico study revealed that the multikinase activity of midostaurin may play a role in the treatment’s efficacy. Additionally, we propose a series of molecular mechanisms that support a potential benefit of midostaurin as a maintenance therapy in FLT3-mutated AML, by regulating the microenvironment. The obtained results are backed up using independent gene expression data.

We evaluated the administration of ARI-0001 cells (chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting CD19) in adult and pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory CD19+ malignancies. Patients received cyclophosphamide and fludarabine followed by ARI-0001 cells at a dose of 0.4–5 × 106 ARI-0001 cells/kg, initially as a single dose and later split into 3 fractions (10%, 30%, and 60%) with full administration depending on the absence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS). 58 patients were included, of which 47 received therapy: 38 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), 8 with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and 1 with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In patients with ALL, grade ≥3 CRS was observed in 13.2% (26.7% before versus 4.3% after the amendment), grade ≥3 neurotoxicity was observed in 2.6%, and the procedure-related mortality was 7.9% at day +100, with no procedure-related deaths after the amendment. The measurable residual disease-negative complete response rate was 71.1% at day +100. Progression-free survival was 47% (95% IC 27%–67%) at 1 year: 51.3% before versus 39.5% after the amendment. Overall survival was 68.6% (95% IC 49.2%–88%) at 1 year. In conclusion, the administration of ARI-0001 cells provided safety and efficacy results that are comparable with other academic or commercially available products. This trial was registered as ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03144583 .

Contains fulltext : 220562.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) with t(6;9)(p23;q34) is a poor-risk entity, commonly associated with FLT3-ITD (internal tandem duplication). Allogeneic stem-cell tranplantation (allo-SCT) is recommended, although studies analysing the outcome of allo-SCT in this setting are lacking. We selected 195 patients with t(6;9) AML, who received a first allo-SCT between 2000 and 2016 from the EBMT (European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation) registry. Disease status at time of allo-SCT was the strongest independent prognostic factor, with a two-year leukaemia-free survival and relapse incidence of 57% and 19% in patients in CR1 (first complete remission), 34% and 33% in CR2 (second complete remission), and 24% and 49% in patients not in remission, respectively (P < 0.001). This study, which represents the largest one available in t(6;9) AML, supports the recommendation to submit these patients to allo-SCT in CR1.

© 2021 The Author(s)., The potential prognostic value of conventional karyotyping in adult T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) remains an open question. We hypothesized that a modified cytogenetic classification, based on the number and type of cytogenetic abnormalities, would allow the identification of high-risk adult T-ALL patients. Complex karyotype defined by the presence of ≥3 cytogenetic alterations identified T-ALL patients with poor prognosis in this study. Karyotypes with ≥3 abnormalities accounted for 16 % (22/139) of all evaluable karyotypes, corresponding to the largest poor prognosis cytogenetic subgroup of T-ALL identified so far. Patients carrying karyotypes with ≥3 cytogenetic alterations showed a significantly inferior response to therapy, and a poor outcome in terms of event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), independently of other baseline characteristics and the end-induction minimal residual disease (MRD) level. Additional molecular analyses of patients carrying ≥3 cytogenetic alterations showed a unique molecular profile that could contribute to understand the underlying molecular mechanisms of resistance and to evaluate novel targeted therapies (e.g. IL7R directed) with potential impact on outcome of adult T-ALL patients., This project was supported by the AECC (GC16173697BIGA); ISCIII (PI19/01828) co-funded by ERDF/ESF "A way to make Europe"/ "Investing in your future", CERCA/Generalitat de Catalunya SGR 2017 288 (GRC)/ “La Caixa” P. Barba was supported by the Instituto de Salud Carlos III FIS16/01433 and PERIS 2018-2020 from Generalitat de Catalunya (BDNS357800).

Context: There is a debate regarding the impact of t(1;19) (q23;p13) in adult BCP ALL. While the MD Anderson group suggests it may be a low-risk subtype, the German, English, and French study groups have shown no differential outcome, and Italian and SWOG groups have reported poor outcomes. Objective: To analyze the frequency and clinical impact of t(1;19) in a series of adult BCP ALL patients (pts). Design & Patients: A review of 513 adult BCP ALL pts (15 to 60 years) diagnosed between 2003 and 2017 and treated with MRD-oriented protocols of the PETHEMA Group. Interventions: G-banding and FISH were performed on BM samples. Measurable residual disease (MRD) was centrally assessed by multi-parametric flow cytometry. Main Outcomes Measures: Complete response (CR), overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), assessed by competing risk analysis. Results: Total of 26 pts with t(1;19)/TCF3-PBX1 (representing 5% of all BCP ALL). 9/23 (39%) cases showed isolated t(1;19) while 14/23 (61%) had additional chromosomal aberrations (ACA). Pts with t(1;19) were more likely to be female (73% vs 45%, p=0.006) and pre-B phenotype (63% vs 17%, p Conclusions: Although showing favorable initial treatment response, pts with t(1;19) experience a higher rate of relapse (especially those with ACA to t(1;19)) than the remaining BCP ALL pts, without differences in OS. A deeper genetic analysis may identify markers of poor outcome enabling a more precise risk stratification of t(1;19) pts.

We evaluated the administration of ARI-0001 cells (chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting CD19) in adult and pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory CD19(+) malignancies. Patients received cyclophosphamide and fludarabine followed by ARI-0001 cells at a dose of 0.4–5 × 10(6) ARI-0001 cells/kg, initially as a single dose and later split into 3 fractions (10%, 30%, and 60%) with full administration depending on the absence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS). 58 patients were included, of which 47 received therapy: 38 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), 8 with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and 1 with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In patients with ALL, grade ≥3 CRS was observed in 13.2% (26.7% before versus 4.3% after the amendment), grade ≥3 neurotoxicity was observed in 2.6%, and the procedure-related mortality was 7.9% at day +100, with no procedure-related deaths after the amendment. The measurable residual disease-negative complete response rate was 71.1% at day +100. Progression-free survival was 47% (95% IC 27%–67%) at 1 year: 51.3% before versus 39.5% after the amendment. Overall survival was 68.6% (95% IC 49.2%–88%) at 1 year. In conclusion, the administration of ARI-0001 cells provided safety and efficacy results that are comparable with other academic or commercially available products. This trial was registered as ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03144583.

In the European LeukemiaNet favourable risk category, allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is not indicated in first complete remission for patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) with NPM1 mutations (ELNfav NPM1 AML), although a proportion of these patients will relapse. Given the prognostic importance of measurable residual disease (MRD), CETLAM-12 considered a pre-emptive intervention in patients with molecular failure (MF). We analyzed 110 ELNfav NPM1 AML patients achieving complete remission (CR) after induction chemotherapy. Two-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), overall survival (OS) and leukaemia-free survival (LFS) were 17%, 81 center dot 5% and 82%, respectively. Forty-six patients required additional therapy for MF (n = 33) or haematological relapse (HemR; n = 13), resulting in a molecular LFS (molLFS) and a cumulative incidence of MF at two years of 61% and 38% respectively. Two-year OS for these 46 patients was 66%, with a different outcome between patients with MF (86%) and HemR (42%) (P = 0 center dot 002). Quantitative NPM1 detection at different timepoints was predictive of molLFS; an MRD ratio (NPM1mut/ABL1 x 100) cut-off of 0 center dot 05 after first consolidation identified two cohorts with a two-year molLFS of 77% and 40% for patients below and above 0 center dot 05, respectively. In conclusion, MRD-based pre-emptive intervention resulted in a favourable outcome for ELNfav NPM1 AML patients.

Vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGFC) stimulates leukemia cell proliferation and survival, and promotes angiogenesis. We studied VEGFC expression in bone marrow samples from 353 adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and its relationship with several clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular variables. We also studied the expression of 84 genes involved in VEGF signaling in 24 patients. We found that VEGFC expression was higher in AML patients with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) than in patients with non-AML-MRC. We also found an association between VEGFC expression and the patient cytogenetic risk group, with those with a worse prognosis having higher VEGFC expression levels. No correlation was observed between VEGFC expression and survival or complete remission. VEGFC expression strongly correlated with expression of the VEGF receptors FLT1, KDR, and NRP1. Thus, in this series, VEGFC expression was increased in AML-MRC and in subgroups with a poorer prognosis, but has no impact on survival.

Background: The Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) classifies pts with MDS into risk categories, from very low-risk (vLR) to very high-risk (vHR), which guide treatment (tx) options. Pts with intermediate-risk MDS (IR-MDS) are heterogenous and real-world tx practices and outcomes for these pts are unknown. In Spain, the GESMD is an MDS registry containing more than 16,000 pts registered from 142 study sites which represent the country. We evaluated the real-world tx patterns and survival outcomes of pts with MDS from this registry across IPSS-R risk groups (with a focus on IR-MDS) and explored factors driving tx decisions among pts with IR-MDS. Methods: We analyzed the data collected by the GESMD registry from January 2008 to June 2020. Pts included were adults diagnosed with MDS, with informed consent and ≥6-mo follow up if the pt was alive. Pts who did not have available data on their MDS risk score or their use of hypomethylating agent for MDS were excluded. Prior to inclusion in the registry, a curation process was performed to ensure that each pt had the minimum data set and to avoid duplication and errors. Data queries were responded to by physicians at study sites, and the final data included were reviewed by the investigators. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographics, clinical, and tx characteristics overall and by risk groups. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by risk group and tx type using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. In pts with IR-MDS, a number of baseline variables (including sex, diagnosis year, transfusion status, risk score, age, and blood and blast counts) were explored to assess their relationship with tx selection between either azacitidine (AZA) or best supportive care (BSC) only (eg, transfusions, growth factors). Results: In total, 4,604 pts were included in this analysis. The median age of enrolled pts was 76 y and 39% were female. Other baseline characteristics are seen in Table 1. Seven hundred sixty-one pts (16.5%) were classified as IR-MDS with similar distribution across IPSS-R risk score subgroups 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5. Txs received by pts in the cohort included AZA, chemotherapy, allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT), BSC, and others (eg, immunosuppressors, androgens; Table 2). The majority of pts with IR-MDS were treated with BSC (61%) and AZA (38%). The median time from diagnosis to start of AZA tx ranged from 1 mo in pts with high-risk (HR) and vHR-MDS to 26 mo in pts with vLR-MDS; pts with IR-MDS started AZA at a median of 3 mo from diagnosis. Survival analysis by IPSS-R group shows that median OS decreased with increased risk score (vLR: 81.3 mo [95% CI, 73.6-89.0], low-risk (LR): 59.0 mo [95% CI, 55.2- 62.8], IR: 29.4 mo [95% CI, 27.0-31.8], HR: 15.2 mo [95% CI, 13.3-17.1], vHR: 9.4 mo [95% CI, 7.7-11.1]). When analyzed by tx type, pts with IR-MDS had longer median OS when treated with AZA or chemotherapy ± alloSCT than with BSC (AZA: 30.1 mo [95% CI, 27.3-32.9], chemotherapy ± alloSCT: 30.1 mo [95% CI, 23.8-36.4], BSC: 24.6 mo [95% CI, 18.5-30.7]; Figure 1). No relevant factors associated with decision to treat pts with IR-MDS with AZA or BSC were identified. Conclusions: This study shows that more than one-third of pts with IR-MDS were treated with AZA shortly after their diagnosis, similar to the HR/vHR group. This cohort represents what we know about MDS and its distribution by risk group, while bringing new information on the use of AZA and its potential value in improving the OS of pts with IR-MDS. It is possible that other factors not included in the analysis (comorbidities, distance to the hospital, social and familial support) might have had an influence on the decision to treat pts with IR-MDS with AZA or offer BSC instead. Selection bias, misclassification, and confounding might occur when using registry data and this may limit the interpretation; however, the study shows important insights into the use of real-world therapies for pts with MDS, especially IR-MDS. The COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on the study, delaying the availability and curation process of data from recent years. Analysis of length of AZA tx in relation to response to tx is ongoing. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Diez-Campelo: BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Sasse: Novartis: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Wormser: Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Novartis: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Hernandez Donoso: Novartis: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Colicino: Novartis: Current Employment, Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company. Tormo: Astellas, Novartis, Jazz, Pfizer, Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Sanz: Gilead Sciences: Other: Travel, accommodations, and expenses; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accommodations, and expenses, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accommodations, and expenses; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Helsinn Healthcare: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accommodations, and expenses, Research Funding. Díaz-Beyá: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Jerez: Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; GILEAD: Research Funding. Valcárcel: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizzer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jansen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure: Sabatolimab is a novel immuno-myeloid therapy targeting TIM-3 and is under investigation for the treatment of patients with myeloid malignancies

Background: Genetic information has become critical to understand the development of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and to elucidate the origin of disease relapse. Several genetic markers, together with measurable residual disease (MRD), are considered strong predictors of patient outcome. However, the prognostic significance of genetic markers can varie according to treatment. Aim: We used targeted deep sequencing to analyze the genetic profile of 125 T-ALL patients enrolled in three consecutive MRD-oriented trials from the Spanish PETHEMA (Programa Español de Tratamientos en Hematología) group. Genomic information was analyzed together with the main clinical and biologic data in a subset of 111 patients with detailed clinical and outcome data to determine the prognostic significance for overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Methods: Genetic mutations were detected using a custom gene panel and sequenced on a MiSeq platform. Alignment, variant calling, filtration and annotation of variants were done using standardized pipelines. OS curves were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. CIR was estimated using cumulative incidence functions by competing risks analysis. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to identify predictive factors for OS. Statistical significance was set at (two-sided) p-values Results: Recurrently mutated genes found in ≥4/125 patients involved transcription factor tumor suppressor genes (PTEN, BCL11B, RUNX1, GATA3, ETV6), epigenetic regulators (PHF6, DNMT3A, EP300, KMT2C, EZH2, TET2), DNA mismatch repair genes (MSH2), ribosomal (RPL5) and RNA splicing (U2AF1) genes, and genes involved in the RAS/MAPK (NRAS), WNT (FAT1, FAT3), IL7R-JAK-STAT (JAK3, JAK1, IL7R) and NOTCH1 signaling pathways, respectively. Mutations in the latest pathway (NOTCH1 & FBXW7) was found in 88/125 (70%) patients. Clinical-genetic correlations revealed that patients with mutations in JAK3, DNMT3A, N/KRAS, IL7R, MSH2 or in U2AF1 were associated with lower OS (vs unmutated patients). None of the mutated genes had impact on CIR. Upon grouping the mutated genes according to their functional role and potential biological impact on T-ALL, two gene signatures were defined. These included the aging gene signature (DNMT3A and U2AF1) characterized by mutations in genes identified in clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP); and the treatment resistance gene signature (JAK3, N/KRAS, IL7R and MSH2), defined by mutations in genes involved in resistance to the ALL therapy. Both clusters identified patients with poorer response to therapy (poorer blast clearance on day 14 of induction treatment and lower CR rates). Therefore, we considered together (worse outcome genetics [WOG] signature) for univariate and multivariate analyses. WOG and MRD level (0.1% cut-off) on day 35 after induction therapy (+35d MRD) showed significant prognostic impact in the univariable and multivariable analyses for OS (3y) with a hazard ratio (95% CI) of 2.4 (1.2; 4.8) and 2.7 (1.4; 5.1), respectively (Table 1). OS according to these two variables allowed risk stratification of T-ALL into low, intermediate- and high-risk (HR) patients with significantly different outcomes (p Conclusion: A genetic signature with independent prognostic significance of MRD has been identified in this cohort of patients included in MRD-oriented trials. This gene signature (WOG) together with MRD could help to improve risk-stratification of adult T-ALL patients and would be of interest in the search for new therapies for HR patients Funding: Support from AECC (GC16173697BIGA); ISCIII (PI19/01828 and PI19/01183), co-funded by ERDF/ESF, "A way to make Europe"/"Investing in your future", CERCA/Generalitat de Catalunya SGR 2017 288 (GRC)/ C González-Gil was supported by AGAUR grant (2020 FI_B2 00210). Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Diaz-Beyá: Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Mercadal: Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Tormo: Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Barba: Amgen, Celgene, Gilead, Incyte, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche, Jazz Phar,aceuticals: Honoraria; Cqrlos III heqlth Institute, aSOCIACION espanola contra el cancer, PERIS: Research Funding. Maciejewski: Regeneron: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy. Ribera: ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; AMGEN: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; TAKEDA: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; SHIRE: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.

Introduction The outcome of patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is still dismal, especially in patients with a relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease. In these patients, innovative treatment strategies must be considered in order to improve survival. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CART) immunotherapy has demonstrated its efficacy and safety in diverse B-cell neoplasms and therefore is being investigated in other hematological malignancies. In AML, CART development is challenging due to the absence of a universal target antigen across AML subtypes, as well as on-target/off-tumor toxicity in healthy tissues. Among all explored AML antigens, CD123 seems to be a safe antigen to target, given its expresion in a high proportion of bulk and leukemic AML stem cells and with a higher level compared to normal hematopoietic progenitors cells. Herein we detail the generation and the in vitro assays of a CD123 CAR-T model (ARI-0003) for AML. Methods We developed an anti-CD123 antibody-secreting hybridoma and thereafter identified the variable domains of heavy and light chains of the immunoglobulin to create the scFv domain. The CAR (ARI-0003) genetic sequence was designed and cloned into a pCCL plasmid, and together with a VSV-G, RRE and REV plasmids we transfected HEK 293T cells to obtain 3 rd generation lentivirus (Figure 1A). T-lymphocytes were obtained from healthy volunteers and were transduced with lentiviral vectors to generate CAR-T cells. CAR expression in infected T-cells was monitored with flow cytometry using anti-F(ab) 2 antibodies. To test in vitro activity against AML, non-transduced T-lymphocytes (NT) and CAR-T cells were incubated with AML cell lines and AML primary samples from diverse genetic subtypes, and cytotoxicity was evaluated by flow cytometry at 24 and 48 hours using CD123 and CD33 antibodies. Results At the time of co-incubation of target cells and lymphocytes, the mean scFv expression of ARI-0003 in CAR-T cells was 37% (range, 20-57). Cytotoxicity assays with AML cell lines (THP-1, Kasumi1) showed higher target cell mortality with CAR-T cells, compared to NT cells (mean percentage of alive cells at 48h, obtained with an effector-target cell ratio of 1:1, of 0 and 1% [CAR] vs 45 and 57 [NT] in THP-1 and Kasumi1, respectively; Figure 1B-C). This differential cytotoxic activity was maintained using distinct effector ratio, being statistically significant in higher ratios (namely, 1:1, 1:2 and 1:4). Moreover, cytotoxicity induced by CAR-T cells was higher at 48 hours compared to 24 hours. To demonstrate antigen specificity of ARI-0003 CAR-T cells, CD123 negative cell lines (Raji, 697) were used, and target cell mortality was not statistically significant between CAR-T and NT in CD123-negative cell lines. Finally, ARI-0003 CAR-T efficacy was tested against 8 primary AML samples with a distinct genetic risk, including 5 unfavorable cases according to the European LeukemiaNet classification and 3 AML samples refractory to multiple high-intensity regimens (Figure 1F). Interestingly, a significant cytotoxic effect was observed against all 8 samples after incubation with ARI-0003 CAR-T cells at higher E:T ratio (p < 0.05 for ratios 1:1, 1:2 and 1:4; Figure D-E). Conclusions In vitro assays showed that immunotherapy with CAR-T cells ARI0003 against CD123 could be an effective approach for R/R AML. In vivo experiments are needed in order to confirm these results before translating this therapy to clinical phases. Moreover, on-target/off-tumor toxicity induced by ARI-0003 CAR-T needs to be explored, especially myelotoxicity due to target antigen expression in hematopoietic precursor cells. Figure legend A) Structure of the ARI0003 CAR. B) Cytotoxicity of CAR-T cells against cell lines (normalized to background toxicity observed with NT cells). C) Flow cytometry of THP1 cells against NT and CAR-T cells. D) Cytotoxicity of CAR-T cells against AML primary samples (normalized to NT percentage). E) Absolut number of remaining AML cells after 48h of coincubation with CAR or NT cells. F) Characteristics of AML primary samples used for in vitro assays. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Diaz-Beyá: Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Esteve: Abbvie: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding.

Introduction The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 classification for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) stratifies patients in 3 risk categories, according to genetic features of the disease. ELN classification is commonly used to guide post-remission treatment; favorable risk patients do not seem to benefit from allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation (alloHCT) in first complete remission (CR1) while this procedure is highly recommended in adverse risk patients. Post-remission treatment in intermediate risk patient is still debated. This classification has not been prospectively validated. Herein we analyze the prognostic impact of ELN 2017 classification in patients treated with the same protocol (CETLAM-12), including a well-defined preplanned alloSCT policy according to genetic risk. Methods We analyzed characteristics and outcome of patients diagnosed with de novo AML, included in CETLAM-12 protocol for patients up to 70 years, with an available genetic characterization at diagnosis allowing an accurate ELN 2017 stratification. Genetic risk allocation was based on cytogenetic analysis and pre-specified RT-PCR of determined markers (including CBF-rearrangement, NPM1, FLT3, CEBPA, and MLL-PTD) performed in all patients, and targeted Next Generation Sequencing testing (available in 143 patients). CETLAM-12 protocol defines a genetic risk stratification in three groups, closely similar to that proposed by the ELN 2017 classification, and recommends a post-remission strategy based on this risk assessment. Patients from the favorable group received three courses of consolidation with high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC), whereas alloSCT in CR1 is strongly recommended for intermediate and adverse risk patients following one HiDAC-based consolidation course. Results We included in the study 813 patients (400F/413M; median age 56, 17-76); with a 37 months median estimated follow-up (range 0.1-92). The outcomes of the entire cohort are shown in table 1. Out of all patients, 641 could be classified according to the ELN 2017 classification, due to the presence of risk defining genetic features identified by any of described methods. In the group of .atients allocated in the favorable risk category (n=316; 49%), twenty-seven patients died during induction. Fifty-eight relapses were observed, mostly in patients with NPM1 mutation (n=41). AlloSCT was finally performed in CR1 in 84 patients (27%) due to MRD persistence or reappearance (n=40), overt hematological relapse (n=27), persistent aplasia following chemotherapy (n=3) and protocol deviation (n=14). In the group of patients allocated in the intermediate risk category (n=95; 15%), twelve patients died during induction. AlloSCT in CR1 was performed in 62 patients (67%), with 5 patients receiving an alloSCT in CR2. In the group of patients allocated in the adverse risk category (n=230; 36%), twenty-five patients died during induction. AlloSCT could be finally performed in CR1 in 138 patients (60%) and 88 relapses occurred (42 before alloSCT, 46 after alloSCT). Amongst ELN adverse risk patients, a subgroup with a significant worse outcome has been identified, defined by AML with complex karyotype +/- TP53 mutation or chromosome 3q26/MECOM-GATA2 rearrangement. This group (ELNadv+) presented a lower CR rate, with a higher relapse rate and fewer proportion of patients who receive a pre-planned alloSCT in CR1. OS and EFS of ELNadv+ is significantly lower than ELN adverse patients. In the multivariate analysis for OS including age, sex, WBC count at diagnosis and number of cycles to achieve CR, only age and ELNadv+ status showed independent prognostic value. Outcome data is summarized in table and figures attached. Conclusions The initial risk-adapted post-remission assignment planned in CETLAM-12 could be performed in the majority of patients. Despite this different proposed post-remission treatment, ELN risk classification was able to identify three groups of patients with a markedly different outcome. Interestingly, within the unfavorable ELN category, a very high-risk ELNadv+ subgroup can be distinguished, with a dismal outcome with current approach, warranting the implementation of innovative pre and post-transplant strategies aimed to prevent treatment failure. Figure Disclosures Tormo: MSD: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Salamero:Pfizer: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daichii Sankyo: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sierra:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead-Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Introduction:Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) real-world incidence has been investigated in a limited number of European countries such as Sweden, Denmark and a few others. These prospective population-based analyses give a more precise idea of AML as a health problem than registry data from cooperative groups or other sources, that usually include selected cases as part of research studies and/or therapy trials. In October 2016, the Autonomous Government of Catalonia funded a project (PERIS SLT002/16/00433) to prospectively collect all AML cases from our territory. Objective:To investigate the incidence, characteristics and treatment decisions in all consecutive AML patients diagnosed in Catalonia between January 2017 and December 2019. Methods:Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of AML according the WHO 2016 criteria, both primary and secondary (APL excluded) with an age >18 years. The project was disseminated to all hospitals from Catalonia regardless of their size, having at least one hematologist. A specific informatics tool was implemented for remote reporting of the cases. All data were anonymized. In parallel, a circuit for centralized bio banking of patients' samples was designed. The database included the main clinical, laboratory data as well as the initial therapeutic approach. Cases included in our CETLAM group cooperative studies were automatically linked to the trial database for collecting detailed information. Statistical analyses were performed with R packages. Results:Assuming an incidence of AML of 4 cases per 100,000 inhabitants (based on previous reported data from others), we expected 912 cases during three years in the 7,6 million population of Catalonia. Our prospective registry included 750 consecutive AML patients, 82% of the expected cases. The remaining 18% could be explained by the exclusion of APL, age below 18 years, or underreporting. Seventy percent of patients (n=527) were diagnosed and treated in the 5 large University Hospitals from Barcelona and the two adjacent cities (Badalona and Hospitalet). Table 1 shows the main characteristics of the patients. Among the 390 patients up to 70 years, 272 (70%) were enrolled in the CETLAM AML-12 protocol that included intensive chemotherapy (ICT) and risk adapted hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Forty-one additional patients (11%) in this age group received other ICT in different clinical trials. A remaining 73 patients (20%) were treated with other intensive or non-intensive approaches outside trials. In the group of 360 patients older than 70 years only a 33% (n= 119) were treated under the risk-adapted CETLAM AML-16 protocol for elderly AML patients. This trial included ICT as in the CETLAM-12 in case of favorable genetic features; this was received by 13 of the 119 patients (11%) enrolled. The remaining patients of CETLAM-16 were treated with low-intensity chemotherapy (oral fludarabine, subcutaneous (SC) cytarabine and G-CSF or azacytidine) and 97 additional elderly patients were included in other clinical trials mostly with targeted and hypomethylating agents (27%). Other active therapies outside trials (usually low-intensity) were administered in 50 additional patients (14%) whereas the remaining 94 patients (26%) only received supportive measures (transfusions, hydroxyurea, antibiotics, palliation, or no treatment), because of one or more of the following: advanced age, poor AML features or severe clinical condition. Overall survival (OS) of the whole series at 2 years was 31±2% (CI: 27-35). Patients younger than 70 years had a 2-year OS of 47±3% (CI: 41-53) compared to 11±3% (CI: 7-17) for those above 70 years (p Conclusions:This prospective study is highly representative of the diagnosis and treatment of AML in Catalonia. The median age at diagnosis was 70 years. Of note, 81% of patients up to 70 years were enrolled in ICT trials. The proportion of patients in trials in the elderly group was lower although still remarkable (60%). In this advanced age group, a 26% of patients were treated with supportive measures only. Despite the high inclusion rate in clinical trials, only one third of newly diagnosed AML patients have the probability to survive at 2 years, with a dismal outcome in those above 70 years. Therefore, the investigation of novel and more effective treatments remains mandatory. This series will be detailed and updated during the meeting. Disclosures Salamero: Pfizer:Consultancy;Jazz Pharmaceuticals:Consultancy, Honoraria;Daichii Sankyo:Honoraria;Novartis:Consultancy, Honoraria;Celgene:Consultancy, Honoraria.Olivera:BAYER:Consultancy;Pfizer:Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Daiichi Sankyo:Consultancy, Speakers Bureau;Boehringer Ingelheim:Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.Sureda Balari:Celgene:Consultancy, Honoraria;Merck Sharpe and Dohme:Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Sanofi:Consultancy, Honoraria;Novartis:Consultancy, Honoraria;Gilead/Kite:Consultancy, Honoraria;Janssen:Consultancy, Honoraria;Incyte:Consultancy;Roche:Honoraria;BMS:Speakers Bureau;Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb:Consultancy, Honoraria;Takeda:Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.Ribera:Pfizer, Amgen:Research Funding;Pfizer, Amgen, Ariad, Novartis:Consultancy, Speakers Bureau.Sierra:Jazz Pharmaceuticals:Research Funding;Pfizer:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Daiichi Sankyo:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Abbvie:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Novartis:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau;Astellas:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Roche:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Gilead-Kite:Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

BACKGROUND: The progress in the understanding of pathophysiology of AML has allowed the identification of genetic and immune abnormalities with prognostic impact on outcome and suitable as therapeutic targets. The genetic abnormalities are essential for risk allocation and risk-adapted treatment included the indication of hematopoietic cell transplantation. In the last decade, several studies have shown that persistence of measurable residual disease (MRD) after chemotherapy increases relapse incidence and the probability of leukemia recurrence and survival. Therefore, MRD has been progressively incorporated in prognosis estimation. In the last 25 years the CETLAM cooperative group has promoted 4 consecutive trials for AML patients fit for intensive chemotherapy and eventually HCT. Post-remission treatment was based on genetics of the disease and more recently on MRD. The aim of this study has been to investigate if the survival of patients has improved and, if so, to identify the factors that have influenced on the better outcome. METHODS: We included all patients with primary AML up to the age of 60 years enrolled in 4 consecutive Spanish CETLAM group trials. In brief, induction chemotherapy included idarubicin, cytarabine and etoposide in AML-94, AML-99 and AML-03 protocols and without etoposide in the AML-12. G-CSF priming was allowed in the two more recent trials. Post remission therapy included 1 to 3 consolidations including intermediate or high dose cytarabine. Hematopoietic transplantation indication was based on availability of an HLA-compatible donor, genetic findings and more recently MRD. Follow-up was extended to June 2020. The survival and relapse incidence analyses were censored at 5 years. Informed consent was obtained in all cases and the institutional review boards approved the protocols. RESULTS: Between 1994 and 2019, 1755 primary AML patients between 18 and 60 years-old fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The main characteristics of patients appear in table 1. Median age of the whole group was 46 years old. Overall survival (OS) in the whole group was 45% at 5 years, being significantly better in AML-03 and AML-12 than in AML-94 and AML-99 (image 1). Event free survival (EFS) in the whole group was 37% at 5 years, with also significant differences between trials. Also, the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 39% in the whole group with less relapses in the two more recent trials (image 2). To understand these findings, we analyzed first the CR rate over time that was higher in the AML-03 and AML-12 protocols (table 2). The results were different depending on genetics of AML with highest CR rate in patients with CBF AML and in those with intermediate-risk cytogenetics and favorable molecular findings; in contrast, patients with adverse cytogenetics had the lowest CR rate mainly because frequent refractoriness to therapy. According to outcomes in each MRC cytogenetic group 5y-OS was: 69±3% (63-76) in favorable group, 46±2% (43-49) in intermediate and 21±3% (16-27) in adverse group (p Referent to feasibility of allogeneic HCT, there was an increased access to the procedure over the years. A higher proportion of patients allografted in AML-03 and AML-12, 32% and 41% of patients in CR, respectively, compared to 16% in AML-94 and 19% in AML-99. A shortening of the interval between CR and transplantation has been observed in recent years; 3.9 months (mo) in AML-94, 2.7 mo in AML-99, 2.9 mo in AML-03 and 2.2 mo in AML-12. CONCLUSIONS: In adults with primary AML and age up to 60 years-old have improved over the last 25 years. During this period, the CETLAM group has refined the biological characterization of AML patients and tailored the post-remission therapy based on genetic markers with prognostic impact. The increased feasibility of allogeneic HCT may also justify the better results in more recent trials. Even though, there is substantial room for improvement, particularly in patients with AML and adverse genetic features. Disclosures Salamero: Pfizer: Consultancy; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daichii Sankyo: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Moraleda:Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Sandoz: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Tormo:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ribera:Pfizer, Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer, Amgen, Ariad, Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Sureda Balari:Roche: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck Sharpe and Dohme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Sierra:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead-Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Introduction Current diagnosis of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) requires peripheral blood (pb) monocytosis ≥1×109/L. Accordingly, cases which fulfill other diagnostic criteria of CMML but not reaching the required pb monocytosis threshold would be classified as MDS or unclassifiable MPN/MDS according to WHO classification (Arber et al, Blood 2016) Recently, a group of authors (Geyer et al, Modern Pathology 2017) proposed the term oligomonocytic CMML (OM-CMML) for these patients with blood monocytes ≥10% of the WBCs, but only accounting for 0.5-1 × 109/L as an absolute value and fulfilling all other criteria of CMML and suggested that they should be managed as other patients with classical CMML despite lacking pb monocytosis ≥1×109/L. To address clinical value of this proposed newly entity, we analyzed the incidence, clinico-biological characteristics and outcome of a series of patients fulfilling the proposed criteria for OM-CMML from a single center with a long follow-up. Methods We included patients diagnosed between 1997 and 2019 who gathered the proposed criteria for OM-CMML (Geyer et al, Modern Pathology 2017). These patients were compared with a cohort of patients from the same study period diagnosed with classical CMML. Statistical analyses were performed using Rv3.1 and SPSS v20. Next generation targeted sequencing (NGS) was performed with Ion Ampliseq AML Research and Oncomine Myeloid Research Assay panel Results Overall, we included in the study 213 patients, including 35 (16%) who fulfilled the proposed criteria for OM-CMML. Median follow-up of alive patients was 42 months. In the OM-CMML group, 71% were males, median age was 74 years (51-92). OM-CMML patients presented at diagnosis with a lower leucocyte count (WBC) (median value, 4.6(2.2-7.5)x109/L vs 10(3-119)x109/L, p NGS at diagnosis was available in 26 pt, without observing significant differences regarding gene mutation frequency. At diagnosis 17% of OM-CMML patients were transfusion-dependent and the distribution according to CPSS categories was: low (48%), int-1 (23%), int-2 (26%) and high (3%) risk, without difference with c-CMML (Table 1). Progression to a c-CMML was observed in 67% (24) of OM-CMML pts with a median time to progression of 7 months (m) (1-149 m). We did not observe differences in transformation rate to AML (AML-t; 10 (28.5%) vs 44 (24.7%) among OM-CMML and c-CMML group, p=0.6) or cumulative incidence (CI) of AML-t between OM-CMML and c-CMML patients (50m-CI AML-t: 35%±7 vs 21±12, p=0.3) (Fig 1). Eight out of the 10 pt (80%) who developed an AML previously presented a c-CMML phase. Median time to AML-t was longer in OM-CMML pt: 60m (3-219) vs 13.7m (0.8-124), p=0.011. The percentage of patients who received treatment in OM-CMML cohort was similar to that of c-CMML pts: (28% vs 21%, p=0.37, respectively). Moreover, time to treatment requirement was similar in both patient cohorts (15m (0.9-211m) vs 10m (0.1-112), p=0.5, respectively). Finally, overall survival of OM-CMML did not differ from that of c-CMML (5-year Overall Survival: 45±16% vs 30±7%; p=0.31, Figure 2). Conclusion: Clinical features and evolution of patients with OM-CMML were comparable to that of patients with c-CMML, supporting similar classification and management criteria. Acknowledgement: PI16/01027 (JE; MDB), PI19/01476 (JE; MDB) Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Introduction: Although the IPSS-R stratifies patients with MDS in five risk groups and includes an intermediate-risk group, treatment options are commonly based on the division of the patients into low-risk MDS (LR-MDS) and high-risk MDS (HR-MDS). However, it is not well-defined which cut-off better classifies patients in LR-MDS vs. HR-MDS and, specifically, to which category belongs the intermediate IPSS-R group. A prior study from the International Working Group for the Prognosis of MDS suggested that a cut-off of ≤3.5 points was adequate to identify LR-MDS patients. The aim of the study was to establish the point of the IPSS-R that best divides patients in LR-MDS and HR-MDS and describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of the intermediate-risk subgroup. Methods: All patients diagnosed with MDS according to the WHO 2008 from the Spanish Registry of Myelodysplastic Syndromes between 1980 and 2019 were included. Patients with an OS ≥30 months were defined as LR-MDS. The prognostic risk of the patients was performed according to the IPSS-R. The IPSS-R point that dichotomized the patients was obtained in agreement with the value that maximized the log-rank test in the overall survival (OS) analysis and the Youden index. Kaplan-Meier test was used for survival analysis, Cox model to obtain the hazard ratios (HR) and competing risk analysis for the evolution to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Statistical analysis was performed by software R. Results: Among 8,107 MDS included in the registry, 4,103 had all the variables to be classified according to the IPSS-R (patients characteristics detailed in table 1). The median follow-up for survivors was 52.7 months (CI95% 49.9-56.5). Median OS was 52.9 months (CI95% 50.2-56). The IPSS-R cut-off that best identified LR-MDS patients was ≤3.5 (75% accuracy to predict OS ≥30 months). According to this value, 2,830 (69%) and 1,273 (31%) patients were classified as LR-MDS and HR-MDS, with a median OS of 75 months (CI95% 71.1-80.7) and 15.4 months (CI95% 14.5-17.4), respectively; [HR= 3.68 (95%CI 3.37-4.02); p When the whole cohort was stratified into MDS with IPSS-R low (IPSS-R ≤3), intermediate (IPSS-R 3.5-4.5), and high (IPSS-R >4.5), median OS was 79, 30.8 and 12.1 months, respectively (Figure 2). Patients characteristics are detailed in table 2. Considering the point of 3.5, most of the intermediate IPSS-R patients (457 of 706, 65%) were upgraded to MDS-HR. Moreover, MDS with intermediate IPSS-R exhibited an OS and a 3 years cumulative incidence of AML evolution [20.7% (CI95% 17.7-24.3)] analogous to MDS with high IPSS-R. Conclusions: Our study supports the use of a cut-off of ≤3.5 to stratify MDS patients in low and high-risk subgroups, with significant differences in both OS and risk of AML transformation. Intermediate-risk IPSS-R group disclose a clinical outcome resembling more HR-MDS than LR-MDS. Thus, by using this cut-off most of the intermediate IPSS-R MDS patients are indeed considered as higher risk. These findings have relevant clinical implications, as they imply that intermediate-risk patients should be managed as high-risk MDS. Disclosures Villacampa: Merck Sharp & Dohme: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Other: advisory role. Tormo:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ramos:Roche: Other: travel grant; Rovi: Other: travel grant; Merck-Sahrp & Dohme: Other: travel grant; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: travel grant; Takeda: Consultancy, Other: travel grant ; Jannsen: Other: travel grant; Abbvie: Consultancy, Other: travel grant; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel and research grants; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: travel grant; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: travel grant. Diez-Campelo:Celgene BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Introduction NPM1mutation is considered a founder genetic event of acute myeloid leukemia withNPM1mutation (NPM1mut-AML). Nonetheless, growing evidence of pre-existing genetic mutations and clonal hematopoiesis (clonal response) after intensive AML treatment in many patients is being generated, although the precise clinical impact of this genetic background is mostly unknown. Thus, the emergence of a wild-typeNPM1myeloid neoplasm (NPM1wt-MN) after intensive chemotherapy treatment forNPM1mut-AML is a well-known phenomenon, but poorly described in long-term follow-up. Sequential genetic analysis with next generation sequencing (NGS) has the potential to elucidate the clonal origin of diverse emerging clinical scenarios occurring during clinical follow-up based on tracking of genetic evolution of clonal hematopoiesis status after AML treatment, as recently proposed (Hasserjian et al, Blood 2020). We aimed to analyze the incidence and clinico-biological characteristics ofNPM1wt-MN emerging after treatment forNPM1mut-AML in a long-term follow-up series from a single institution. Patients and Methods We included in the study 62 patients diagnosed withNPM1mutAML patients and treated with intensive chemotherapy according to two consecutive protocols of the Spanish CETLAM cooperative group (CETLAM-2003 and -2012). Patients were diagnosed between 2005 and May 2019.NPM1wt-MN has been classified according to recent criteria proposed by Hasserjian et al, Blood 2020. Statistical analyses were performed using Rv3.1 and SPSS v20. Next generation targeted sequencing (NGS) was performed with Ion Ampliseq AML Research and Oncomine Myeloid Research Assay panel. Results The cohort included 62 patients (median age, 53 years, 25-73) with a median follow-up of alive patients of 44 months. After induction therapy, 58 patients (pt) achieved complete remission (CR) and 21 pt relapsed asNPM1mut-AML. Additionally, 9 pts (15%) developed aNPM1wt-MN: 4 (7%) presented aNPM1wt-AML relapse and 5 (8%) developed otherNPM1wt-MN (non-AMLNPM1wt-MN) that would be classified as residual myeloid neoplasm according to proposed criteria: 1 myelodysplastic syndrome, 3 myeloproliferative/myelodysplastic syndrome [2 CMML and 1 atypical chronic myeloid leukemiaBCR-ABLnegative (aCML)] and 1 polycythemia vera (PV) Characteristics of the 3 groups (NPM1mut-AML,NPM1wt-AML, non-AMLNPM1wt-MN) are shown in the Table. Median time from CR achievement to progression was longer in the group who developed a non-AMLNPM1wt(24 vs 8 months; p=0.016), and an statistical trend of younger ager in pts with AML-NPM1mutgroup (48 vs 69 vs 60 years-old, respectively, p=0.056) and lower leucocyte count in pt presenting a non-AMLNPM1wt-MN (5.5 vs 29 vs 50 x109/L, respectively, p=0.065) were observed. Moreover, among 19 pts with available NGS at diagnosis,DNMT3Amutation was more frequently comutated inNPM1mut-AML (71% vs 0%vs 40%, respectively p=0.034) andSRSF2was more frequently mutated in non-AMLNPM1wt-MN (60% vs others (0%), p=0.01). Interestingly, outcome of patients presenting with AML relapse did not differ according to NPM1 status at relapse (NPM1mut-AML vs.NPM1wt-AML), with a similar response rate after salvage chemotherapy (80% vs 75%, p=NS) and OS (5-year OS: 75±40% vs 60±20%; p=NS). NGS analysis of paired samples at diagnosis and emergentNPM1wt-MN in pts who lostNPM1mutation at progression is detailed in Figure. Frequently persisting mutations were those usually found in clonal hematopoiesis such as DNA methylation (TET2, DNMT3A, IDH1, IDH2), chromatin remodeling ASXL1, and splicing factor SRSF2, whereasFLT3mutation was the most frequently lost at relapse.TP53, PTPN11,SETBP1, JAK2, IDH1oASXL1were mutations gained at time of NPM1wt-MN emergence. Conclusions A proportion of pts withNPM1mut-AML will develop an NPM1 wild-type myeloid neoplasm after intensive chemotherapy-induced CR, emerging from preleukemic clonal hematopoiesis. Given this possible evolution, which can not be predicted byNPM1mutmeasurable residual disease monitoring, an active surveillance of these pts is recommended, including genetic re-testing at time of disease relapse or progression. Acknowledgement:PI16/01027 (JE; MDB), PI19/01476 (JE; MDB) Table:Characteristics at diagnosis depending on type of progression. Figure:Mutations in paired samples (diagnosis/relapse) of patients who developed aNMPwt-MN. Figure Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Background No standardized and widely accepted cytogenetic classification with prognostic impact for adult T-ALL has been proposed to date. Methods Patients with abnormal karyotypes (65/139, 47%) were classified according to the number of chromosomal alterations (Chun K. et al., 2009). Cohort 216 adults T-ALL patients/ NCT00853008 - NCT01540812 /PETHEMA cooperative group. Prognostic impact of karyotype on event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) were assessed. Additionally, next-generation sequencing (NGS) experiments were done. Results Greater than three cytogenetic abnormalities were associated with lower rates of both complete remission (CR, 77% vs. 94%; p=0.032) and minimal residual disease (MRD) level Conclusions Compared to BCP-ALL, a lower cut-off to define complex karyotypes based on the presence of ≥3 cytogenetic alterations allows the identification of T-ALL patients with poor prognosis. Interestingly, molecular analyses of patients carrying ≥3 cytogenetic alterations revealed a unique molecular profile that could contribute to understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms of resistance and to evaluate novel targeted therapies (e.g. IL7R-directed) that might improve the response to treatment and outcome of adult T-ALL patients. Funding ISCIII (PI19/01828), co-funded by ERDF/ESF, “A way to make Europe”/”Investing in your future”.

BACKGROUND: AML risk classification is based on genetics (cytogenetics and molecular features) and more recently also on minimal residual disease (MRD) after chemotherapy. These two aspects allow predicting relapse and supporting or not the most anti-leukemia treatment that remains allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We prospectively investigated the combined use of the two predictive markers to allocate post-remission therapy with or without HCT. Objectives of the study were testing: a) if this approach was feasible in a multicenter setting; b) the proportion of patients who were allocated to an allogeneic HCT and finally received the procedure; c) the final distribution into the risk categories and their outcome; d) to analyze the outcome of patients with favorable or intermediate genetics moved to the high risk category because of positive MRD. METHODS: Adult patients with primary AML treated at 15 academic hospitals were included between February 2012 and December 2018. Induction chemotherapy consisted of idarubicin 12 mg/m2 days 1-2-3 and cytarabine 200 mg/m2 days 1 to 7. Consolidation courses were high-dose cytarabine (3 g/m2 or 1.5 g/m2 if ≥60 y/o). The number of consolidation courses was based on genetic risk: 3 in favorable genetics category (FGC) (CBF, NPM1mut/FLT3-ITDwild or ratio0.1%) and/or quantitative PCR of the specific transcripts (RUNX1/RUNX1T1, CBFβ/MYH11 and NPM1). RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-five patients (median age: 55, range18-70 y/o, 51% male) were enrolled. Cytogenetics according the revised MRC classification in 707 informative cases was: CBF AML 12%, intermediate 65% (75% of them normal karyotype), and adverse 23%. FLT3-ITD was detected in 28% of patients with intermediate risk cytogenetics and NPM1 mutation in the same group was present in the 48%. Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 81% (n=603) of patients, 82% and 80% in patients up to and above 60 yrs, respectively. Induction death occurred in 9% of patients, 7% and 11% the two age groups, and 10% of patients had refractory leukemia; 542 (90%) of the 603 CR patients completed the consolidation phase and were risk allocated taking into account genetics and MRD. The remaining CR patients were not allocated because of early relapse (n=22), death in CR (n=5), severe toxicity (n=22) or others (n=12). After risk allocation, 208 (38%) patients were in the genetics-MRD combined favorable group (CFG), 103 (19%) in combined intermediate group (CIG) and 231 (43%) in the combined adverse group (CAG). In the latter, 185 (80%) of patients received an allogeneic HCT in first CR. Fifty-seven patients (11%) moved from the genetically FGC or IGC to the CAG because of high MRD at the end of consolidations. Median follow-up in survivors was 25 months. Overall 4-years survival (OS) of the whole series is 48±2%; event-free survival (EFS) is 77+3% in the CFG group, 45+6% in the CIG and 34+4% in the CAG (p CONCLUSION Risk adapted therapy for primary AML based on genetics and MRD is feasible in a cooperative group setting. The proportion of CR was high (>80%) even in patients older than 60 y/o. MRD assessment at the end of consolidation moved 57 patients with favorable or intermediate genetics to the CAG. Avoiding HCT in first CR in the FGC patients associated to EFS above 75% at 4 years. Allogeneic transplantation feasibility was 80% when this was the intended treatment because of adverse genetics and/or MRD positivity. Risk assessment based on genetics and MRD continues separating three groups of patients with different outcomes. Since relapses remain frequent when adverse AML features are present, further approaches after transplantation, such as targeted agents and immune therapies deserve investigation. Disclosures Sierra: Astellas: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Salamero:Daichii Sankyo: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Esteve:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy.

The name of Pau Montesinos was inadvertently presented as Pau Montesinos Fernández in the original article.The original version of this article was revised: The name of Pau Montesinos was inadvertently presented as Pau Montesinos Fernández.

In intermediate-risk cytogenetic acute myeloid leukemia (IRC-AML) patients, novel biomarkers to guide post-remission therapy are needed. We analyzed with high-density arrays 40 IRC-AML patients who received a non-allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation-based post-remission therapy, and identified a signature that correlated with early relapse. Subsequently, we analyzed selected 187 genes in 49 additional IRC-AML patients by RT-PCR. BAALC, MN1, SPARC and HOPX overexpression correlated to refractoriness. BAALC or ALDH2 overexpression correlated to shorter overall survival (OS) (5-year OS: 33 +/- 8.6% vs. 73.7 +/- 10.1%, p = .006; 32 +/- 9.3% vs. 66.4 +/- 9.7%, p = .016), whereas GPR44 or TP53INP1 overexpression correlated to longer survival (5-year OS: 66.7 +/- 10.3% vs. 35.4 +/- 9.1%, p = .04; 58.3 +/- 8.2% vs. 23.1 +/- 11.7%, p = .029). A risk-score combining these four genes expression distinguished low-risk and high-risk patients (5-year OS: 79 +/- 9% vs. 30 +/- 8%, respectively; p = .001) in our cohort and in an independent set of patients from a public repository. Our 4-gene signature may add prognostic information and guide post-remission treatment in IRC-AML patients.

Objectives: We assess the epidemiology and risk factors for mortality of bloodstream infection (BSI) in patients with acute leukemia (AL). Methods: Prospectively collected data of a cohort study from July 2004 to February 2016. Multivariate analyses were performed. Results: 589 episodes of BSI were documented in 357 AL patients, 55% caused by gram-positive bacteria (coagulase-negative staphylococci 35.7%, Enterococcus spp 10.8%) and 43.5% by gram-negative bacteria (E. coli 21%, PA 12%). We identified 110 (18.7%) multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms, especially MDR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7%) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (7%). The 30-day mortality was 14.8%. Age (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.7–5.7); chronic lung disease (4.8; 1.1–21.8); fatal prognosis according to McCabe index (13.9; 6.4–30.3); shock (3.8; 1.9–7.7); pulmonary infection (3.6; 1.3–9.9); and MDR-PA infections with inappropriate treatment (12.8; 4.1–40.5) were related to mortality. MDR-PA BSI was associated to prior antipseudomonal cephalosporin use (9.31; 4.38–19.79); current use of betalactams (2.01; 1.01–4.3); shock (2.63; 1.03–6.7) and pulmonary source of infection (9.6; 3.4–27.21). Conclusions: MDR organisms were commonly isolated in BSI in AL. Inappropriate empiric antibiotic treatment for MDR-PA is the primary factor related to mortality that can be changed. New treatment strategies to improve the coverage of MDR-PA BSI should be considered in those patients with risk factors for this infection.

Epigenetic mechanisms are crucial for the inactivation of key genes related to the survival of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) cells, and methylation is a frequent epigenetic mechanism of microRNA silencing. We have examined the methylation-induced silencing of tumor suppressor microRNAs in HL cell lines and confirmed our results in patient lymph nodes. In addition, we evaluated the in vitro effectiveness of 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine (5-Aza-dC) in HL cell lines. Ten microRNAs containing CpG islands in their promoter region were re-expressed in both the L-428 and L-1236 cell lines. Interestingly, miR-34a and miR-203, both known tumor suppressor microRNAs, were found to be methylated in cell lines and in patient samples. 5-Aza-dC treatment resulted in a dose-dependent antiproliferative effect at 72 h in all the HL cell lines. In summary, 5-Aza-dC treatment of HL cell lines inhibits proliferation at high doses and produces re-expression of the tumor suppressor microRNAs at low-intermediate doses.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clinically and molecularly heterogeneous neoplasia with poor outcome, organized as a hierarchy initiated and maintained by a sub-population with differentiation and self-renewal capacities called leukemia stem cells (LSCs). Although currently used chemotherapy is capable of initially reducing the tumor burden producing a complete remission, most patients will ultimately relapse and will succumb to their disease. As such, new therapeutic strategies are needed. AML cells differentially expressed serotonin receptor type 1 (HTR1) compared with healthy blood cells and the most primitive hematopoietic fraction; in fact, HTR1B expression on AML patient samples correlated with clinical outcome. Inhibition of HTR1s activated the apoptosis program, induced differentiation and reduced the clonogenic capacity, while minimal effect was observed on healthy blood cells. In vivo regeneration capacity of primary AML samples was disrupted upon inhibition of HTR1. The self-renewal capacity remaining in AML cells upon in vivo treatment was severely reduced as demonstrated by serial transplantation. Thus, treatment with HTR1 antagonists showed antileukemia effect, especially anti-LSC activity while sparing healthy blood cells. Our results highlight the importance of HTR1 in leukemogenesis and LSC survival and identify this receptor family as a new target for therapy in AML with prognostic value.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with myelodysplasia-related changes is characterized by the presence of multilineage dysplasia (MLD), frequently related to high-risk cytogenetics and poor outcome. However, the presence of MLD does not modify the favorable prognostic impact of NPM1 mutation. The prognosis of patients with AML presenting marked dysplasia lacking high-risk cytogenetics and NPM1 mutation is uncertain. We evaluated the prognostic impact of MLD in 177 patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetics AML (IR-AML) and wild-type NPM1. Patients were categorized as MLD-WHO (WHO myelodysplasia criteria; n = 43, 24 %), MLD-NRW (significant MLD non-reaching WHO criteria; n = 16, 9 %), absent MLD (n = 80, 45 %), or non-evaluable MLD (n = 38, 22 %). No differences concerning the main characteristics were observed between patients with or without MLD. Outcome of patients with MLD-WHO and MLD-NRW was similar, and significantly worse than patients lacking MLD. The presence of MLD (66 vs. 80 %, p = 0.03; HR, 95 % CI = 2.3, 1.08-4.08) and higher leukocyte count at diagnosis was the only variable associated with lower probability of complete remission after frontline therapy. Concerning survival, age and leukocytes showed an independent prognostic value, whereas MLD showed a trend to a negative impact (p = 0.087, HR, 95 % CI = 1.426, 0.95-2.142). Moreover, after excluding patients receiving an allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first CR, MLD was associated with a shorter survival (HR, 95 % CI = 1.599, 1.026-2.492; p = 0.038). In conclusion, MLD identifies a subgroup of patients with poorer outcome among patients with IR-AML and wild-type NPM1.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chemosensitization using plerixafor combined with FLAG-IDA (PLERIFLAG regimen) showed promising results (48% CR/CRi) in a phase 2 trial for primary refractory and early relapsed (duration of first CR Patients: Of the 540 patients in the data base we analysed 300 patients relapsed or resistant to induction therapy, which had all data available. 241 patients were treated with FLAG-IDA, 41 with FLAGO-Ida, and 42 with PLERIFLAG. Differences between treatment cohorts were tested using Fisher exact test. Treatment cohorts (PLERIFLAG vs FLAG-IDA vs FLAGO-IDA) were similar in Age (p=0.5), Sex (p=0.5), FLT3-ITD mutated (p=0.5), EPI/HOVON cytogenetics score (p=0.5) and previous myelodisplasia (p=0.2). The three cohorts differed in time to relapse (p=0.001), previous stem cell transplantation (0.001), HOVON score (p=0.03) and SALFLAGE score (0.001). RESULTS There were no differences in terms of CR+CRi between the three types of treatment adjusted by Hovon risk score (Pleriflag: 48%, FLAG-IDA: 50% or FLAGO-IDA: 58%; Chrochan Maentel-Haenszel test, p=0.466) or SALFLAGE score (Chrochan-Maentel-Haenszel test, p=0.23). More patients were allografted in the PLERIFLAG (61%) group even not achieving CR/Cri, as compared to FLAG-IDA (38%) or FLAGO-Ida (61% vs 38% vs. 18%, p=0.0001). To compare PLERIFLAG against the other two types of salvage treatment we performed a Propensity Score in a proportion 1:3. We adjust variables like age, previous allogeneic transplant, time to relapse (refractory, 12 months), karyotype using MRC, and FLT3-ITD status. Karyotype risk was considered by HOVON criteria (inv16, t(8;21) vs others), and SALFLAGE (inv 16, intermediate risk, and unfavourable risk by MRC risk plus t(8;21)). The propensity score analyses showed that Compared to FLAG-IDA, PLERIFLAG was associated to increased survival (median OS 10.56 months vs. 5.6, p=0.03), but not improved EFS (2.83 months vs 1.41 months, p=0.8). The benefit in OS but not in EFS could be explained in part by frequent use of Allo SCT in patients who had not achieve CR/CRi in the PLERIFLAG cohort. In conclusion, our historical control study show that PLERIFLAG regimen is an acceptable therapeutic option for first relapsed/refractory adult AML patients. Disclosures Esteve: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Salamero:Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Daichii Sankyo: Honoraria. Perez Encinas:CELGENE: Consultancy; JANSSEN: Consultancy; GILEAD SCIENCES: Research Funding. Montesinos:Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Speakers Bureau; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Research support, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous disease whose prognosis is mainly related to the biological risk conferred by cytogenetics and molecular profiling. In elderly patients (>= 60 years) with normal karyotype AML miR-3151 have been identified as a prognostic factor. However, miR-3151 prognostic value has not been examined in younger AML patients. In the present work, we have studied miR-3151 alone and in combination with BAALC, its host gene, in a cohort of 181 younger intermediate-risk AML (IR-AML) patients. Patients with higher expression of miR-3151 had shorter overall survival (P = 0.0025), shorter leukemia-free survival (P = 0.026) and higher cumulative incidence of relapse (P = 0.082). Moreover, in the multivariate analysis miR-3151 emerged as independent prognostic marker in both the overall series and within the unfavorable molecular prognostic category. Interestingly, the combined determination of both miR-3151 and BAALC improved this prognostic stratification, with patients with low levels of both parameters showing a better outcome compared with those patients harboring increased levels of one or both markers (P = 0.003). In addition, we studied the microRNA expression profile associated with miR-3151 identifying a six-microRNA signature. In conclusion, the analysis of miR-3151 and BAALC expression may well contribute to an improved prognostic stratification of younger patients with IR-AML., Marina Diaz-Beya is supported by ISCIII (Rio Hortega CM13/00205). This research was in part supported by Fundacion Espanola de Hematologia y Hemoterapia (beca de investigacion MDB). This research is also supported by grants from Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias/Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI13/00999 (PI: JE), RETICS RD12/0036/0010 (JE; MDB) and SDCSD from School of Medicine, University of Barcelona, AECC-Catalunya 2013 (AN) (sponsored by Mat Holding), and grants AGAUR 2014SGR-1281, ISCIII RD12/0036/0071 and PI014/00450 (JS). Anna Cordeiro is an APIF fellow of the University of Barcelona.

Background Treatment for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has not significantly changed in the last decades and new therapeutic approaches are needed to achieve prolonged survival rates. Leukemia stem cells (LSC) are responsible for the initiation and maintenance of AML due to their stem-cell properties. Differentiation therapies aim to abrogate the self-renewal capacity and diminish blast lifespan. Methods An in silico screening was designed to search for FDA-approved small molecules that potentially induce differentiation of AML cells. Bromocriptine was identified and validated in an in vitro screening. Bromocriptine is an approved drug originally indicated for Parkinson’s disease, acromegaly, hyperprolactinemia and galactorrhoea, and recently repositioned for diabetes mellitus. Results Treatment with bromocriptine reduced cell viability of AML cells by activation of the apoptosis program and induction of myeloid differentiation. Moreover, the LSC-enriched primitive AML cell fraction was more sensitive to the presence of bromocriptine. In fact, bromocriptine decreased the clonogenic capacity of AML cells. Interestingly, a negligible effect is observed in healthy blood cells and hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Conclusions Our results support the use of bromocriptine as an anti-AML drug in a repositioning setting and the further clinical validation of this preclinical study. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12967-016-1007-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background: ETP-ALL was included as a provisional identity in the 2016 WHO classification of ALL. This subtype was first identified by Coustan-Smith et al. in 2009. However, this immunophenotype-based classification does not fully enclose all ETP-ALL cases identified by gene expression profile (GEP). Although early studies in small series of ETP-ALL suggested a very poor outcome for ETP ALL more recent and larger series have showed improvement in outcome treating children with a contemporary protocol based on chemotherapy schedules, or after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in adults. Aim: To investigate the clinical and biological features of ETP-ALL cases in the Spanish cohort of adult T-cell ALL (T-ALL) patients and to assess the potential impact of high-risk therapy on their outcome. Method: One hundred eighty-five adults with T-ALL treated according to two consecutive MRD-oriented high-risk adult PETHEMA protocols -ALL-HR-2003 (NCT00853008) and ALL-HR-11 (NCT01540812; still ongoing)- were included in this study. The EGIL criteria were used to define the immunologic subtype of T-ALL after central review of immunophenotype reports, and the criteria proposed by Zuurbier et al. (Zuurbier L. et al. Haematologica 2014; 99:94-102) were used to define ETP-ALL. These later criteria consist of a combination of immunophenotypic markers (absence of CD1a-/CD4-/CD8-, cut-off 25%), that resemble those published by Coustan-Smith, with the advantage that include most ETP-ALL cases, as identified by GEP, avoiding the use of partial expression of CD5 marker to immuno-classify these patients. Results: Thirty-four out of 167 evaluable patients (20%) with T-ALL showed an ETP-ALL immunophenotype. Patients with ETP-ALL were older (mean 39 [SD 12] vs. 33 [12] yr; p=0.011), showed more frequently lymph node involvement (79% vs. 56%; p=0.021) and lower WBC counts at diagnosis (mean, 72 [155] vs. 97 [112] x109/L; p=0.004). At genetic level, ETP-ALL patients were associated with the absence of deletions in CDKN2A/B gene cluster (91% vs. 26%; p10% BM blasts on day+14) vs. 37% of non-ETP (p Conclusions: ETP-ALL accounts for 20% of adult T-ALL in the PETHEMA cohort and it is associated with a poorer initial response to treatment (lower CR rate, poorer MRD clearance) than the remaining T-ALL patients. Such poorer outcome is not overcome by allo-SCT in our series. Supported by grants from: Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer, AECC (GC16173697BIGA), Instituto Carlos III (PI14/01971 FI), 2017-SGR288 (GRC), CERCA Program from Generalitat de Catalunya, and "La Caixa" Foundation. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Montesinos: Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Introduction Patients diagnosed with AML with NPM1mutation (NPM1mut AML) included in the European LeukemiaNet favorable genetic risk category (ELNfav, i.e., without FLT3-ITD or with a low allelic burden FLT3-ITD comutation [FLT3-ITD/FLT3wt Methods All patients diagnosed with ELNfav NPM1mut AML treated according to CETLAM-12 protocol who achieved CR after 1 or 2 courses of induction chemotherapy were included in the study. Intended post-CR therapy consisted of 3 courses of high-dose cytarabine chemotherapy (HDAC). MRD was assessed in bone marrow samples after each chemotherapy course and thereafter, at regular 3-month interval during 3 years, in reference labs from CETLAM group following standard NPM1-mutation specific RQ-PCR. MF was defined as failure to achieve a molecular response (molCR) after consolidation therapy (i.e., NPM1mut/ABL·100 ratio > 0.05) or MRD reappearance after molCR. All MFs were confirmed in a second sample collected at least 4 weeks apart from previous sample. For patients who present a MF, alloSCT was recommended, without a predefined indication of debulking previous salvage chemotherapy. Results Out of 145 patients with ELNfav NPM1mut AML (75 M/70 F; median age, 56, 18-74), 132 (91%) achieved CR after 1 (n=124) or 2 courses (n=8). After a median follow-up of 25 months, 2-year overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), leukemia-free survival (LFS) of the entire cohort were 79.9% (±3.6), 71.8% (±4) and 79.4% (±3.8), respectively. Among patients with available complete MRD information (n=89), 33 patients developed an hematological and/or molecular failure (Mol/Hem failure), resulting into a Mol/Hem failure-free survival at 2 years of 62% (±5.6%); median time from CR to Mol/Hem failures was 8.2 months (2-43). Fourteen patients presented with an overt hematological relapse (hREL), preceded by a detectable MF in 8. Overall, 14 received salvage therapy in morphological CR, MRD(+) status (MF), and 14 For hREL. Among MF, 5 patients received HDAC-type salvage treatment (followed by alloSCT in 3) and 9 proceeded directly to alloSCT. In 5 additional MF patients with MRD persistence after consolidation, subsequent MRD monitoring showed decreasing MRD levels until complete clearance (n=4) or intermitent detection (n=1) and have not received further therapy. After salvage therapy, 12/14 (86%) patients with MF achieved molCR, and 10/14 (71%) treated for hREL achieved CR2 (MRD negative in 7, 50%), followed by alloSCT in 9. OS after Mol/Hem failure was 64.8% (± 8.4) at 2 years, 88.8 (±7.5%) in patients treated for MRD(+)-status (MF) and 32.1% (±13.6%) in patients treated with overt hREL (p Potential predictive factors of Mol/Hem failure were investigated. Interestingly, a ratio of NPM1mut/ABL*100 ≥1 after induction allowed distinction of two patient subpopulation with strikingly different Mol/Hem failure risk: Mol/Hem failure-free survival at 2 years of 84±6% vs. 33±10% in patients with a lower ( Conclusion Despite a significant proportion of Mol/Hem failures, NPM1mut AML patients allocated in the ELN favorable risk group presented a favorable overall outcome. NPM1mut-based MRD surveillance is able to anticipate most hematological relapses, and a MRD-driven early intervention policy, at time of MF, allowed a successful rescue of a significant proportion of patients. Moreover, an early measure of residual tumor burden, after induction therapy, might identify those patients with a high risk of molecular or hematological subsequent failure, allowing the potential implementation of preemptive intensification strategies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.