Search

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dabrafenib-trametinib-131I for the treatment of radioactive iodine refractory metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) with a BRAF p.V600E mutation. Patients and Methods: A prospective phase II trial including patients with RECIST progression within 18 months and no lesion > 3 cm. Following a baseline recombinant human (rh)TSH-stimulated diagnostic whole-body scan (dc1-WBS), dabrafenib and trametinib were given for 42 days. A second rhTSH-stimulated dc WBS (dc2-WBS) was done at day 28 and 131I (5.5 GBq–150 mCi after rhTSH) was administered at day 35. Primary endpoint was the 6-month RECIST objective response rate. In case of partial response (PR) at 6 or 12 months, a second treatment course could be given. Among 24 enrolled patients, 21 were evaluable at 6 months. Results: Abnormal 131I uptake was present on 5%, 65%, and 95% of the dc1-WBS, dc2-WBS, and post-therapy scans, respectively. At 6 months, PR was achieved in 38%, stable disease in 52%, and progressive disease (PD) in 10%. Ten patients received a second treatment course: one complete response and 6 PRs were observed at 6 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached. The 12- and 24-month PFS were 82% and 68%, respectively. One death due to PD occurred at 24 months. Adverse events (AE) occurred in 96% of the patients, with 10 grade 3–4 AEs in 7 patients. Conclusions: Dabrafenib-trametinib is effective in BRAF p.V600E-mutated DTC patients for restoring 131I uptake with PR observed 6 months after 131I administration in 38% of the patients.

Waterfall plot of the RECIST response

Quality of Life scores

Purpose:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dabrafenib-trametinib-131I for the treatment of radioactive iodine refractory metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) with a BRAF p.V600E mutation.Patients and Methods:A prospective phase II trial including patients with RECIST progression within 18 months and no lesion > 3 cm. Following a baseline recombinant human (rh)TSH-stimulated diagnostic whole-body scan (dc1-WBS), dabrafenib and trametinib were given for 42 days. A second rhTSH-stimulated dc WBS (dc2-WBS) was done at day 28 and 131I (5.5 GBq–150 mCi after rhTSH) was administered at day 35. Primary endpoint was the 6-month RECIST objective response rate. In case of partial response (PR) at 6 or 12 months, a second treatment course could be given. Among 24 enrolled patients, 21 were evaluable at 6 months.Results:Abnormal 131I uptake was present on 5%, 65%, and 95% of the dc1-WBS, dc2-WBS, and post-therapy scans, respectively. At 6 months, PR was achieved in 38%, stable disease in 52%, and progressive disease (PD) in 10%. Ten patients received a second treatment course: one complete response and 6 PRs were observed at 6 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached. The 12- and 24-month PFS were 82% and 68%, respectively. One death due to PD occurred at 24 months. Adverse events (AE) occurred in 96% of the patients, with 10 grade 3–4 AEs in 7 patients.Conclusions:Dabrafenib-trametinib is effective in BRAF p.V600E-mutated DTC patients for restoring 131I uptake with PR observed 6 months after 131I administration in 38% of the patients.

The COVID-19 vaccination campaign began in December 2020, in France, and primarily targeted the oldest people. Our study aimed to determine the level of acceptance of vaccination in a population of older patients with cancer.From January 2021, we offered vaccination with the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine to all patients 70 years and older referred to our geriatric oncology center in Marseille University Hospital (AP-HM) for geriatric assessment before initiation of an oncological treatment. Objectives were to evaluate acceptance rate of COVID-19 vaccination and to assess vaccine safety, reactogenicity, and efficacy two months after the first dose.Between January 18, 2021 and May 7, 2021, 150 older patients with cancer were offered vaccination after a geriatric assessment. The majority were men (61.3%), with a mean age of 81 years. The two most frequent primary tumors were digestive (29.4%) and thoracic (18%). The vaccine acceptance rate was 82.6% and the complete vaccination rate (2 doses) reached 75.3%. Among the vaccinated patients, 15.9% reported mild side effects after the first dose and 23.4% after the second dose, mostly arm pain and fatigue. COVID-19 cases were observed in 5.1% of vaccinated patients compared with 16.7% in unvaccinated patients. Of the 22 vaccinated patients who agreed to have their serum tested, 15 had antibodies against the spike protein at day 21 after the first dose.Our study showed a high acceptance rate of COVID-19 vaccination, with good tolerance in this frail population. These results highlight the benefits of organizing vaccination campaigns at the very beginning of oncological management in older patients.This study was registered May 23, 2019 in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03960593).

Background: Pembrolizumab, a humanized immunoglobulin monoclonal antibody directed against the programmed cell death 1 receptor, demonstrated robust efficacy and a manageable safety profile across multiple tumor types in clinical trials. Aim: To investigate the efficacy and safety of first-line pembrolizumab for patients with non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) in clinical practice. Methods: In this observational monocentric retrospective study, 38 patients with PD-L1 >50% were enrolled between November 2017 and November 2018. Results: The global median overall survival was 11.08 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.98–not reached) and the global median progression-free survival was 6 months (95% CI, 3–not reached). In the univariate analysis, clinical performance status score and the development of immune-related adverse events were the only 2 clinical factors significantly correlated with overall survival. Conclusion: The results of the present study suggest that pembrolizumab seems less effective in the real-life population than in the pivotal clinical trials in patients with NSCLC but remains an effective treatment option for patients with NSCLC. Longer follow-up is needed.

Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare malignant tumor of poor prognosis, frequently requiring additional treatments after initial surgery. Due to its adrenolytic action, mitotane has become the first-line medical treatment in patients with aggressive adrenocortical carcinoma. Over the last 2 years, apart from the classical chemotherapy based on etoposide and platinum salts, several studies reported the use of drugs such as temozolomide, tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immunotherapy, with more or less convincing results. The aim of this review is to give further insights in the use of these drugs, and to describe potential therapeutic perspectives based on recent pangenomic studies, for the future management of these still difficult to treat tumors., Le corticosurrénalome malin est une tumeur rare, de mauvais pronostic, nécessitant fréquemment le recours à des traitements médicamenteux après la chirurgie initiale. Depuis de nombreuses années, le mitotane est le traitement de 1re ligne des corticosurrénalomes agressifs, du fait de ses propriétés adrénolytiques. Cependant, ce traitement est souvent insuffisant et associé à une chimiothérapie de type Etoposide/Platine. Au cours des 2 dernières années, plusieurs études ont rapporté l’efficacité plus ou moins probante de nouvelles molécules telles que le temozolomide, les inhibiteurs tyrosine kinase ou l’immunothérapie. L’objectif de cette revue est de préciser les résultats de ces différentes études, et d’apporter quelques données de perspectives basées sur les études pangénomiques, dans l’objectif de mieux appréhender ce que pourrait être la prise en charge de ces tumeurs dans les années à venir.

3130 Background: PROFILER-02 is a multicenter randomized prospective study comparing the proportion of metastatic cancer patients (pts) with Targeted Agent (TA) recommendation provided by large NGS panel (FOne panel, 324 genes) vs home 87-gene NGS panel (CTRL) (PMID 30865223). Methods: Adult pts with advanced/metastatic cancer during 1st or 2nd line of therapy without known targetable gene alteration were eligible and randomized (1:1) to FOne vs CTRL panel. Both panels were performed for each patient. The randomization arm defined the first panel reviewed by dedicated Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) at disease progression while the 2nd panel remained blinded. The primary objective was the pts rate with at least one TA recommendation by the MTB using either FOne or CTRL panel. The study was designed in order to detect difference in proportions of 10% between the two panels. A sample size of 289 pts with both panels were requested to show this difference with an expected proportion of discordant pairs of 20% using a McNemar's test with 98% power and 5% two-sided significance level. Secondary endpoints included number of pts receiving at least one TA, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: From June 2017 to June 2019, among the 339 included pts 171 and 168 pts were randomized in FOne or CTRL panels’ first use, respectively. Median age was 57 years [19.0 - 85.0]; 54.9% were female. The median time from randomization to first MTB was 7.62 months [range 0.80 - 48.1]. Among the 339 pts, 147 pts (43.4%) had no TA recommendation, 108 pts (31.9%) had at least one TA recommendation according to both panels, 67 pts (19.8%) had one or more TA recommendation according to FOne panel only and 17 pts (5%) according to CTRL panel only (McNemar p < 0.001). At the time of the analysis, 51/339 (15%) pts started recommended treatment: 27 pts (8%) with TA recommendation from both panels, 21 pts (6.2%) from FOne only and 3 pts (0.3%) from CTRL only. Main initiated TA were PARP inh. (FOne n = 12; CTRL n = 9), PI3K/AKT/mTOR inh. (FOne n = 10; CTRL n = 9) and immunotherapy (ICI) (FOne n = 7; CTRL n = 0). Median PFS following first MTB were 3.2 months (95% CI 2.5-3.8) and 2.6 months (95% CI 2.0-3.8), median OS were 8.7 months (95% CI 6.6-10.8) and 8.4 months (95% CI 6.4-9.7), in the FOne and CTRL arm, respectively. Conclusions: Larger NGS panel including Tumor Mutational Burden increased the number of recommended options (TA and ICI), as well as the number of treatment initiation. Clinical trial information: NCT03163732.

MEDLINE:30595104; Nivolumab, a fully human immunoglobulin monoclonal antibody inhibiting the programmed cell death protein-1 receptor, demonstrated robust efficacy and a manageable safety profile across multiple tumor types in clinical trials. The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab for pretreated patients with non-small cell lung cancers in clinical practice. In this observational monocentric retrospective study, 98 patients were enrolled between February 2015 and February 2016. The global median overall survival was 6.34 months (95% confidence interval (CI) : 4.11-10.88) and the global median progression free survival was 1.84 months (95% CI: 1.68-2.73). In the univariate analysis, clinical performance status score was the only factor significantly correlated with overall survival. The safety profile of nivolumab is consistent with that described in prior studies, with only 7% undesirable effects requiring the discontinuation of treatment. The results of the present study demonstrate that nivolumab affords clinical efficacy and manageable tolerability in patients with non-small cell lung cancers.

Background: In the Study of (E7080) Lenvatinib in Differentiated Cancer of the Thyroid (SELECT) phase 3 trial on advanced radioactive iodine–refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (rDTC), lenvati...

Background The aims of this study were to report nutritional status in a large panel of patients with cancer requiring exclusive chemotherapy and to study the influence of nutritional status on their quality of life (QoL). Methods This work was a longitudinal cohort study performed at a French university teaching hospital. Eligible patients were individuals with a cancer needing treatment based on exclusive chemotherapy. Three work-ups were performed: i) before the administration of the first course of chemotherapy: T1, ii) before the administration of the second (for patients with 3 planned courses) or third (patients with 6 planned courses) course: T2, and iii) before the administration of the last planned course: T3. The following data were collected: general health (performance status) and nutritional status (weight, anorexia grading, albuminemia, pre-albuminemia, and C-reactive protein) and QoL. Results The nutritional status of patients with cancer was preserved. Functional impairment, the presence of anorexia, the palliative nature of the chemotherapy, and an elevated C-reactive protein dosage were independent predictive factors of a lower QoL among patients assessed at the end of chemotherapy. Conclusions Although larger studies should corroborate these findings, clinicians may include this information in the management of patients with cancer requiring exclusive chemotherapy to identify the most vulnerable patients. Trial registration Current controlled trials NCT01687335 (registration date: October 6, 2011). Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0660-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Relationships between QoL scores of functioning scales (EORTC QLQ C30) at T3 and sociodemographic and nutritional status. (DOCX 54Â kb)

Objectifs Dans l’etude SELECT sur les cancers thyroidiens differencies avances refractaires a l’iode (rCDT), le lenvatinib ameliore la survie sans progression (SSP) de 15 mois avec un taux de reponse objective de 64,8 %. Notre etude evalue l’efficacite et la toxicite du lenvatinib en vie reelle. Patients et methodes Nous avons analyse retrospectivement 88 patients consecutifs traites par lenvatinib entre juillet 2015 et juin 2016, dans 27 centres. Parmi eux, 11 patients ont ete exclus pour autre histologie et 2 pour traitement anterieur par lenvatinib. Resultats Soixante-quinze rCDT ont ete analyses (33 femmes, âge median : 65 ans), 24 patients ont recu du lenvatinib en premiere ligne systemique, 47 patients avaient une progression tumorale documentee avant traitement. La dose initiale etait de 24 mg pour 54 patients et inferieure pour 21. Pour une duree mediane de suivi de 7 mois, la duree de traitement etait de 6 mois. La SSP mediane etait de 10 mois. Dix patients n’ont pas eu d’evaluation morphologique. La meilleure reponse tumorale etait une reponse partielle pour 23 patients, une stabilite pour 38 et une progression pour 4. Les effets indesirables (EI) ont justifie une reduction de dose chez 44 patients ou une interruption chez 23. Les plus frequents EI lies au lenvatinib etaient l’asthenie, l’hypertension, l’amaigrissement, les diarrhees et l’anorexie. Onze patients sont decedes. Un pneumothorax est survenu chez 2 patients avec metastases pulmonaires. Conclusions Le lenvatinib est efficace pour le traitement des rCDT en vie reelle. Les EI sont frequents et doivent etre suivis attentivement.

β-HCG belongs to the glycoprotein hormone family and is usually assess to exclude pregnancy for patients potentially eligible to chemotherapy, especially during clinical trials. We studied non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients that were found with elevated serum β-HCG level during clinical trial screening. The first case is a 45-year-old woman who presented with a stage IV undifferentiated carcinoma of the lung eligible for chemotherapy. When screening the patient for a clinical trial combining platinum-based chemotherapy and targeted therapy, the plasma β-HCG level was 19 IU/L (0-5 IU/L). The second case is a 64-year-old woman presented with stage IV poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the lung. When screening the patient for the same clinical trial combining platinum-based chemotherapy and targeted therapy, the plasma β-HCG level was β-HCG 13 IU/L (0-5 IU/L). The serum dosages were double-checked and confirmed elevated β-HCG level. The gynecological work-up definitely rules out an improbable pregnancy. The pathological examination was also checked and confirmed in the two cases a primary lung cancer. An immuno-histochemical reassessment of the pathological specimens with additional tests was performed: for one patient 25% of tumor cells expressed β-HCG. As pregnancies were ruled out, the two cases were extensively discussed with the promoter and the patients finally treated within this clinical trial. The treatments are ongoing. β-HCG is a specific marker for trophoblastic tumors of placenta and gestational tumors. Ectopic expression of β-HCG was found in 20-40% of all common epithelial carcinoma, especially for tumors of the stomach, ovary, liver and lung. Only few cases have been reported in the literature. However, in a young patient with high serum levels of β-HCG two questions arise: is there a place for pregnancy? Are the pathology results accurate? All this could delay the appropriate management of these patients and also potentially prevents the participation of innovative therapeutic strategies. Therefore, knowing this rare but possible expression of β-HCG by lung tumors may speed out the gynecological work-up and the reevaluation of the histological samples in order to minimize the delay in the care of these patients and give them a chance to have new innovative drugs within clinical trial.