Search

Purpose: Cryosurgical ablation of the prostate has been reported as potential treatment for radioresistant clinically localized prostate cancer. We report our experience with the safety and efficacy of salvage cryosurgery using the argon based CRYOCare system (Endocare, Inc, Irvine, California).Materials and Methods: Between October 1997 and September 2000, 38 men with a mean age of 71.9 years underwent salvage cryosurgery for recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy failed. All patients had biochemical disease recurrence, defined as an increase in prostate specific antigen (PSA) of greater than 0.3 ng./ml. above the post-radiation PSA nadir. Subsequently prostate biopsy was positive for cancer. Pre-cryosurgery bone scan demonstrated no evidence of metastatic disease. In addition, these patients received 3 months of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy before cryotherapy.Results: The PSA nadir was 0.1 or less, 1 or less and greater than 1 ng./ml. in 31 (81.5%), 5 (13.2%) and 2 (5.3%) patients...

Objectives. Cryotherapy of the prostate represents a potential treatment for localized recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy. We report our experience and evaluate the predictive factors for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence. Methods. Between October 1994 and April 1999, 43 patients underwent salvage cryoablation. All patients had biopsy-proven recurrent prostate cancer without seminal vesicle invasion, negative bone scans, and negative lymph node dissection. Patients had received 3 months of combined hormonal therapy before cryosurgery. Biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS) was defined as a PSA value less than 0.1 ng/mL. Results. Complications included incontinence (9%), obstruction (5%), urethral stricture (5%), rectal pain (26%), urinary infection (9%), scrotal edema (12%), and hematuria (5%). The mean follow-up was 21.9 months (range 1.2 to 54). Twenty-six patients (60%) reached a serum PSA nadir less than 0.1 ng/mL, 16 (37%) had a PSA less than 4 ng/mL, and 1 (3%) had a PSA less than 10 ng/mL. The bRFS rate was 79% at 6 months and 66% at 12 months. The bRFS rate was higher for patients who had an undetectable postcryotherapy PSA than for patients who did not reach a PSA less than 0.1 ng/mL (73% versus 30%, P = 0.0076). Using multivariate analysis, a PSA nadir greater than 0.1 ng/mL was an independent predictor of PSA recurrence. Conclusions. Current salvage cryotherapy of the prostate can result in undetectable serum PSA levels with low morbidity. Our data support the current safety and efficacy profile. We believe that cryotherapy is a viable option in the treatment of patients who have biopsy-proven local failure after radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Further refinements in technique and equipment may enhance cryosurgical results.

Transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate has been increasingly used as a surgical adjunct in the management of men with lower urinary tract symptoms. In this prospective study we compare the safety and efficacy of transurethral resection of the prostate and electrovaporization.We compared 32 consecutive men (mean age 68.9 years) with lower urinary tract symptoms treated by transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate to a cohort of 32 men (mean age 72.8 years) treated by transurethral resection of the prostate. Parameters of evaluation included American Urological Association symptom score, peak urinary flow rate, adverse events, including serial changes in serum hematocrit and sodium, operative time, postoperative catheterization time, hospitalization time and days lost from work. The data were analyzed by an investigator who was blinded to which procedure was performed.A total of 61 patients were evaluable for followup at 1 year. None required retreatment. At 1 year symptom score decreased 12.8 (66% of patients) and 12.2 (67%) and peak urinary flow increased 9.7 ml. per second (135%) and 11.3 ml. per second (136%) for electrovaporization and resection, respectively, (p0.001). Operative time was significantly longer with electrovaporization than with resection (47.6 +/- 17.6 versus 34.6 +/- 11.2 minutes, p0.003). Catheterization time (67.4 +/- 13.6 versus 12.9 +/- 4.6 hours), hospitalization time (2.6 +/- 0.9 versus 1.3 +/- 0.5 days) and days lost from work (18.4 +/- 7.6 versus 6.7 +/- 2.1) were significantly greater for resection than electrovaporization, respectively. There were no major complications in the electrovaporization group while in the resection group 1 patient required transfusion (5 units) and in 1 a clinical transurethral resection syndrome developed. Potency and retrograde ejaculation were normal in 18 of 18 patients (100%) and 13 of 17 (76%) after resection and 19 of 20 (95%) and 17 of 20 (85%) after electrovaporization.The results indicate that transurethral resection and transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate are effective in reducing lower urinary tract symptoms with similar preservation of sexual function. Both significantly improve peak urinary flow, although resection to a greater degree. Postoperative morbidity, catheterization time, hospitalization time and days lost from work were significantly less, and operative time was significantly longer with electrovaporization. Further studies are underway to determine the long-term durability of response of transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate relative to transurethral resection.