1. Clinical and patient‐centered outcomes using two types of subepithelial connective tissue grafts: A split‐mouth randomized clinical trial
- Author
-
Maria Lúcia Rubo de Rezende, Carla Andreotti Damante, Adriana Campos Passanezi Sant'Ana, Mariana Schützer Ragghianti Zangrando, R. R. Eustachio, and Sebastião Luiz Aguiar Greghi
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Visual analogue scale ,Tissue thickness ,Gingiva ,Dentistry ,Connective tissue ,Esthetics, Dental ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Patient-Centered Care ,Humans ,Medicine ,Gingival Recession ,In patient ,Tooth Root ,ENSAIO CLÍNICO CONTROLADO RANDOMIZADO ,Gingival recession ,Mouth ,Periodontist ,business.industry ,Patient-centered outcomes ,030206 dentistry ,Treatment Outcome ,030104 developmental biology ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Connective Tissue ,Periodontics ,medicine.symptom ,business - Abstract
BACKGROUND This split-mouth randomized clinical trial compared two different types of subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTG) considering clinical parameters and patient-centered outcomes in patients with bilateral recession type 1 multiple gingival recessions after 6 months postoperatively. METHODS A total of 21 patients were surgically treated with coronally advanced flap (CAF) associated with SCTG harvested by: double blade scalpel (DBS) and de-epithelialized (DE) SCTG. Periodontal clinical parameters and esthetics were evaluated by a calibrated periodontist at baseline and after 6 months. Patient-centered outcomes related to pain/discomfort and esthetics were assessed with visual analogue scale after 7 days and 6 months, respectively. RESULTS All clinical parameters, with the exception of probing depth, demonstrated differences in intragroup evaluation, comparing baseline to 6-month evaluation (P
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF