Search

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of skin/mucosal swelling, and/or attacks of severe abdominal pain when it affects the gastrointestinal tract. The disease might be unexpectedly fatal when the upper airways are compromised. HAE clinical presentation, disease course and prognosis are associated with significant disease burden and severely impaired quality of life. Lanadelumab is a breakthrough therapy for the prevention of attacks in HAE type 1 and 2 patients. This revolutionary approach to administer a single subcutaneous injection (once every two to four weeks) and achieve complete disease control has dramatically improved patient care resulting in significant change in the life of affected families. Current data support the drug's tolerability in adult and adolescent patients without notable safety concerns in both clinical research and real-world settings. Rational use of prophylactic treatments of HAE searches for a socio-economic balance, taking into account the life-long course of the disease, the public health funds who pay the monetary price, and the patients who might need to receive the therapy for a period longer than investigated during the development program. In this review, we address the current evidence on lanadelumab's tolerability, highlighting aspects of the drug's rationale use in clinical practice. Further studies need to investigate whether this therapy might be appropriate in other forms of angioedema, such as idiopathic primary angioedema and HAE with normal C1 inhibitor. Future efforts must focus to improve modern drugs' accessibility in more countries. Although modern prophylactic options lessen the risk of fatal laryngeal attacks, patients must be equipped with reliable on-demand therapies and be trained how to use them as such a risk cannot be fully diminished with potentially life-threatening attacks occurring even in subjects with successful and stable long-term prophylaxis. Notwithstanding, further studies are needed to identify early responders from non-responders and develop therapies for the latter.

Background In about 5% of patients with hereditary angioedema due to C1-inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) no mutation in the SERPING1 gene is detected. Methods C1-INH-HAE cases with no mutation in the coding region of SERPING1 after conventional genotyping were examined for defects in the intronic or untranslated regions of the gene. Using a next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform targeting the entire SERPING1, 14 unrelated C1-INH-HAE patients with no detectable mutations in the coding region of the gene were sequenced. Detected variants with a global minor allele frequency lower than the frequency of C1-INH-HAE (0.002%), were submitted to in silico analysis using ten different bioinformatics tools. Pedigree analysis and examination of their pathogenic effect on the RNA level were performed for filtered in variants. Results In two unrelated patients, the novel mutation c.-22-155G > T was detected in intron 1 of the SERPING1 gene by the use NGS and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. All bioinformatics tools predicted that the variant causes a deleterious effect on the gene and pedigree analysis showed its co-segregation with the disease. Degradation of the mutated allele was demonstrated by the loss of heterozygosity on the cDNA level. According to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics 2015 guidelines the c.-22-155G > T was curated as pathogenic. Conclusions For the first time, a deep intronic mutation that was detected by NGS in the SERPING1 gene, was proven pathogenic for C1-INH-HAE. Therefore, advanced DNA sequencing methods should be performed in cases of C1-INH-HAE where standard approaches fail to uncover the genetic alteration.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is becoming much more genetically complex than was initially considered. Thus, the role of HAE genetics is expanding beyond research laboratories, and the genotyping of subjects suffering from HAE has become diagnostically indispensable in clinical practice. The synthesis and interpretation of the clinical and biochemical analyses to facilitate appropriate genetic test selection has thus also become significantly more complex. With this in mind, an international multidisciplinary group of 14 experts in HAE genetics and disease management was convened in October 2018. The objective was to develop clear, actionable, evidence- and consensus-based statements aiming to facilitate the communication between physicians treating patients with HAE and clinical geneticists, and thus promote the effective use of genetics in the management of the disease. Eleven consensus statements were generated, encompassing considerations regarding the clinical indications for genotyping patients with angioedema, the methods of detection of HAE-causative variants, the variant pathogenicity curation, the genotyping of patients with HAE in the clinic, and genetic counseling. These statements are intended both to guide clinicians and to serve as a framework for future educational and further genetic testing developments as the field continues to evolve rapidly.

Hereditary angioedema (HAE), an inherited deficiency offunctional C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH), is characterized byrecurrent episodes of disabling and often painful swelling insubcutaneous and/or submucosal tissues.1HAE attacks aregenerally unpredictable, but triggers for an attack can includehaving a dental or medical procedure (eg, surgery), other trauma,or stress. A preemptive management plan for patients under-going these types of situations may reduce the risk of HAE at-tacks. Recommendations include administration of short-termprophylaxis in patients with HAE before invasive medical pro-cedures, especially those involving the upper airways or digestivetract, with C1-INH concentrate typically the medication ofchoice.

Hereditary angioedema is a rare disease that can often be disabling or even life threatening because of the unpredictable, self-limiting, and localized swelling episodes involving cutaneous, subcutaneous, and mucosal sites. The last decades revealed a spectrum of possibilities to control the disease through the development of effective therapies that changed the life of many patients and families worldwide. This review summarizes the current literature regarding the general management and therapeutic approach in patients with hereditary angioedema, both with and without C1 inhibitor deficiency. Medications already available in the market and new drugs in different research stages of development are addressed. Recent decades saw a huge leap in identifying mechanisms of angioedema and developing modern safe and effective medications to both treat acute angioedema manifestations and control disease activity via prophylactic therapy. Further improvement is still needed, together with improving global accessibility of diagnostic tools and effective medications. Whether novel drugs will demonstrate a sustained cost/effectiveness ratio will be answered in the years to come when we will witness whether a majority of the patients will benefit from these major advances.

Women appear to be more frequently affected with urticaria and angioedema. Sex hormones are believed to have an important mechanistic role in regulating pathways involved in these conditions. This effect is likely nonspecific for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) or many forms of angioedema (AE), because many other chronic diseases such as asthma are also affected by sex hormones. The role of sex hormones has been better elucidated for hereditary AE, because they have been shown to have multiple effects including upregulation of FXII, an important activator of the kallikrein pathway. However, their role in the underlying pathogenesis for CSU is less clear. Autoimmunity is clearly linked to CSU, which is more common in women. This suggests that sex hormones could act as adjuvants in activating or upregulating autoimmune pathways. The purpose of this review is to discuss in detail the role of sex hormones in CSU and AE and how a better understanding of the impact hormones has on these conditions might lead to new treatment advancements with better clinical outcomes.

Background Hereditary angioedema (HAE) due to C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) is characterized by recurrent swelling attacks. A European treatment registry was established to review the adverse event profile and efficacy of recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor (rhC1-INH) for HAE attacks. Methods Individuals with C1-INH-HAE were enrolled following a decision to treat with rhC1-INH and provision of written informed consent. Medical history and baseline HAE information were collected at screening. Healthcare providers entered data on HAE attacks, response to treatment, and adverse events using a web-based questionnaire. Results From July 1, 2011, through December 1, 2019, 71 patients with C1-INH-HAE (30 male/41 female; mean age, 47.3 years; age range, 19–78 years) in 9 countries reported 2356 attacks and were treated with rhC1-INH. Before registry entry, patients, including 20 (28.2%) who were on maintenance therapy/prophylaxis at registry enrollment, experienced a mean of 25 HAE attacks per year (median, 16 [range, 0–185]). Most treated HAE attacks were abdominal (46.1%), followed by peripheral (38.3%), oro-facial-pharyngeal (14.8%), urogenital (3.2%), and laryngeal (2.6%). The mean rhC1-INH dose was 3307 U (43.3 U/kg). Patients reported symptom improvement within 4 h for 97.8% of attacks (2305/2356) with rhC1-INH; most attacks (99.8%; 2351/2356) required only 1 dose. Five attacks were treated with a second dose (total rhC1-INH dose administered for attack, 4200 U). No hypersensitivity, thrombotic/thromboembolic events, or drug-related serious adverse events were reported. Conclusion The rhC1-INH treatment registry provided real-world data on the treatment of 2356 HAE attacks that were consistent with clinical trial data of rhC1-INH in patients with C1-INH-HAE.

Background Allergic rhinitis is the most common allergic disorder. Although the management of the disease is successful in many patients, based on guidelines, some of them remain with symptoms uncontrolled with pharmacotherapy. Presently, there is no substantiated information on the control of allergic rhinitis in patients who underwent sublingual immunotherapy. Objective The purpose of this prospective follow-up study was to assess the control of allergic rhinitis in adults after a three-year course of house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy. Methods This prospective real-life study was designed to include adults with moderate to severe allergic rhinitis sensitized to house dust mite who underwent a three-year course of sublingual immunotherapy. Control of symptoms was assessed by Rhinitis Control Assessment Test (RCAT) after three years of house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy. Additionally, patients assessed their symptoms by utilizing a visual analog scale. Results A total number of 86 consecutively enrolled patients (46 (53.49%) men; mean age 26.10 years (SD = 5.85)) with moderate to severe allergic rhinitis and clinically relevant sensitization to house dust mite were evaluated. When assessed by RCAT on the third year, 74 (86.05%) had well-controlled symptoms and 20 (27.03%) of them were completely controlled. A significant reduction in visual analog scale scores—from 7.52 cm at baseline to 2.31 cm—was established ( P Conclusion This study provided evidence that a three-year course of house dust mite sublingual immunotherapy appears effective in controlling the symptoms of allergic rhinitis.

Introduction: In line with the “one airway, one disease” concept allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma often coexist and the disease mechanism occurring in the upper airway may mirror lower airway events. Eosinophils play an essential role in inflammation of the united airway. The association between blood eosinophil count and asthma control has already been demonstrated but data on such relation with AR control is lacking. The Objective: of our study was to determine whether blood eosinophil count is associated with control of allergic rhinitis. Methods: In this cross-sectional study 124 patients [77 (60.63%) men; mean age 27.92 (SD11.62)] having treatment for AR with/without asthma were evaluated. Rhinitis Control Assessment Test (RCAT) was used for the assessment of rhinitis control. Blood eosinophil count was measured in cells/ml. Results: When assessed by RCAT 49 (39.52%) patients were not well controlled (score ≤ 21). Mean eosinophil count in not-well controlled patients was 316.07 cells/mL (sem 15.17 cells/mL) and 291.06 cells/mL (sem 14.85 cells/mL) in well controlled with no significant difference between controlled and not-well controlled AR (p > 0 05). There was no relation between control of AR and blood eosinophil count (R-0.026; p >0.05). A significantly higher blood eosinophil count was established in patients with asthma comorbidity (p Conclusion: Although essential for inflammation of the united airway, analysis of these findings indicate that unlike asthma blood eosinophil count is not associated with control of AR but with asthma comorbidity.

The annual seasonal influenza vaccine is recommended for everyone 6 months and older Influenza vaccine can be safely administered to even severely egg-allergic recipient Tolerance to egg-containing food/vaccine does not exclude egg allergy

C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2), also called monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) is a key β-chemokine involved in the migration of monocytes and macrophages, playing a significant role in the inflammatory responses in the airways. We aimed to assess the serum levels of MCP-1/CCL2 in a pilot cross-sectional study of Bulgarian children with bronchial asthma (BA) and cystic fibrosis (CF). Forty-two children were recruited to the study as follows: twenty with BA, twelve with CF and ten healthy children. Serum MCP-1/CCL2 levels were measured using ELISA. We found higher serum level of MCP-1/CCL2 in children with BA (191.09±64.96 pg/ml) and CF (258.51±76.45 pg/ml) compared to healthy children (70.30±64.30 pg/ml, p=0.022, and p=0.068, respectively). Younger patients with BA had higher levels of MCP-1/CCL2, as well as children with CF, with levels decreasing gradually with age. We observed also higher levels of MCP-1/CCL2 in children with moderate to severe BA compared to mild BA. We documented the significantly higher level of MCP-1/CCL2 in children with these chronic pulmonary diseases than in healthy controls, which suggesting that investigation of serum MCP-1/CCL2 levels could turn out to be beneficial for the severity of the disease.

Background Defective nasal barrier function is implicated in allergic rhinitis, which results in persistent inflammation and clinical symptoms, among which congestion plays a prominent role. In searching ways to improve the efficacy of nasally applied drugs in this condition, we tested the hypothesis that hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC), known as a mucoprotective agent, could enhance the efficacy of a decongestant (oxymetazoline nasal spray, 0.05%) by "sealing" it to the mucosa. Methods This double-blind placebo-controlled study was conducted with 40 patients (mean age, 35 years; 23 women) with persistent allergic rhinitis. The patients were randomized to receive 1 puff of oxymetazoline, followed by 1 puff of either HPMC or lactose powder (placebo) twice a day for 7 days and then only oxymetazoline rescue medication for another week. Peak inspiratory nasal flow (PNIF) was measured for 360 minutes after oxymetazoline and HPMC or placebo insufflation on days 1 and 8, and at a single point on day 15. Symptoms assessments involve visual analog scales and total nasal symptom scores. Results HPMC significantly enhanced oxymetazoline-increased PNIF at days 1 (p = 0.042) and 8 (p = 0.006). Baseline PNIF was greater in the HPMC group at day 15 (p = 0.014), indicative of further reduced nasal congestion. All nasal symptoms improved in both groups at day 8, but only the HPMC group showed further amelioration at day 15. Rescue medication was smaller in the HPMC group between days 8 and 15. Conclusion HPMC enhances decongestion through mucoadhesion but may also be augmenting the mucosal barrier in allergic rhinitis, which explains the carryover efficacy of oxymetazoline for a week after its discontinuation. Clinical trial registration clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01986582.

SERPING1 genotyping of subjects suspicious for hereditary angioedema due to C1-INH deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) is important for clinical practice as well as for research reasons. Conventional approaches towards the detection of C1-INH-HAE-associated SERPING1 variants are cumbersome and time-demanding with many pitfalls. To take advantage of the benefits of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, we developed and validated a custom NGS platform that, by targeting the entire SERPING1 gene, facilitates genetic testing of C1-INH-HAE patients in clinical practice. In total, 135 different C1-INH-HAE-associated SERPING1 variants, out of the approximately 450 reported, along with 115 negative controls and 95 randomly selected DNA samples from affected family members of C1-INH-HAE index patients, were included in the forward and reverse validation processes of this platform. Our platform's performance, i.e. analytical sensitivity of 98.96%, a false negative rate of 1.05%, analytical specificity 100%, a false positive rate equal to zero, accuracy of 99.35%, and repeatability of 100% recommends its implementation as a first line approach for the genetic testing of C1-INH-HAE patients or as a confirmatory method. A noteworthy advantage of our platform is the concomitant detection of single nucleotide variants and copy number variations throughout the whole length of the SERPING1 gene, moreover providing information about the size and the localization of the latter. During our study, 15 novel C1-INH-HAE-related SERPING1 variants were detected.

Summary: A lot of latex products are used every day in medical and dental practice, as well as in households. This could lead to the development of sensibilisation amongst work-related groups of people, as well as in patients. Reactions that could be seen are not only affecting the skin, presented mainly like allergic contact dermatitis, but might be also severe life-threatening ones. The aim is to present a case of allergic reaction tolatex during regular skin prick testing. Clinical case: We present a clinical case of 47-year-old woman who has been forwarded to the Department of “Imaging and Oral Diagnostics”, Faculty of dental medicine, Medical University-Sofia, for testing the sensitization to latex products because of history for burning sensation, throbbing and itching in the area of the hard palate, lips and the pick of the tongue after regular dental clinical examination with latex gloves. Results: Three different types of testing were conducted for proving a latex allergy- serological examination: ImmunoCAP Phadia, prick-test and epicutaneous test. Additional testings were performed for clarifying the general allergic status of the patient. Conclusion: The diagnosing of sensitization to latex proteins seems to be easily doable but in fact it turns out to be challenging in clinical settings. Despite the performed three diagnostic tests (which are with different results), of great importance turns out to be the prick-testing and the initial clinical symptoms of allergic reaction which is manifested with feeling for edema and itching in the oral cavity. The administration of adrenaline, corticosteroids and antihistamines, included in the protocol for management of emergency situations in this specific case prevented the development of more severe condition.

Background Symptom scoring for the assessment of allergen immunotherapy is associated with a substantial placebo effect. Objective To assess the ability of exhaled breath temperature (EBT), a putative marker of airway inflammation, to evaluate objectively the efficacy of grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy in a proof-of-concept study. Methods This was a double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial in 56 subjects (mean ± SD 30 ± 12 years old, 33 men) sensitized to grass pollen. The objective measurements were EBT, spirometry, and periostin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in blood. Overall discomfort scored on a visual analog scale was used as a proxy for subjective symptoms. Evaluations were performed before, during, and after the grass pollen season. Results Fifty-one subjects (25 and 26 in the active treatment and placebo groups, respectively) were assessed before and during the pollen season. The mean pre- vs in-season increase in EBT was significantly smaller (by 59.1%) in the active treatment than in the placebo group ( P = .030). Of the other objective markers, only the blood periostin level increased significantly during the pollen season ( P = .047), but without intergroup differences. Subjectively, the mean pre- vs in-season increase in the visual analog scale score was 32.3% smaller in the active treatment than in the placebo group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance ( P = .116). Conclusion These results suggest that the efficacy of grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy can be assessed by EBT, a putative quantitative measurement of airway inflammation, which is superior in its power to discriminate between active and placebo treatment than a subjective assessment of symptoms assessed on a visual analog scale. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01785394.

Introduction Patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) are at risk for an acute attack after medical procedures. Short-term prophylaxis may minimize this risk. This study evaluated recombinant C1 esterase inhibitor (rhC1-INH) as short-term prophylaxis. Methods Patients with angioedema were treated with rhC1-INH prior to medical procedures/stressful life events; HAE attacks were recorded through 2 days and >2-7 days postprocedure. Results Fifty-one patients (median age, 44 years [range, 17-73 years]; 62.7% female; 92.2% HAE type 1) were included. A median rhC1-INH dose of 3075 IU (range, 2100-4200 IU) was administered as prophylaxis, median of 60 minutes prior, for 70 procedures (52.9% [n=37] dental [median, 60 minutes preprocedure]); 30.0% [n=21] surgical [median, 45 minutes preprocedure]; 15.7% [n=11] endoscopy [median, 30 minutes preprocedure, and 1.4% [n=1] stressful life event). Majority (n=48; 68.6%) of 70 cases had rhC1-INH administered 10-65 minutes preprocedure: 25 of 48 (52.1%) dental, 16 (33.3%) surgical, and 7 (14.6%) endoscopy. Nineteen (27.1%) cases involved long-term prophylaxis (danazol/tranexamic acid). Overall, 97.1% (68/70) of cases did not have an HAE attack within 2 days postprocedure; 91.4% (64/70) during >2-7 days postprocedure. For 2 attacks occurring within 2 days, rhC1-INH was administered 230 minutes and ≥24 hours preprocedure, respectively. No adverse events were reported. As a self-control group, 76.9% of 26 cases with no long-term/short-term prophylaxis preprocedure had an attack within 2 days postprocedure. Conclusions Short-term prophylaxis with rhC1-INH, administered within several hours preprocedure, was efficacious and safe in adolescents/adults and reduced the risk of an HAE attack postprocedure.

Maria T Staevska Clinical Center of Allergology, Medical University, Sofia, BulgariaAs a group of allergists who treat both allergic rhinitis and urticaria patients on a daily basis, and involved in clinical research, we read with particular interest the review paper “Treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria: a review of the newest antihistamine drug bilastine”,1 published in your journal. Although the group of distinguished authors from the Asia Pacific Region provide an interesting insight into the burden of allergic diseases in this fast developing part of the world, no new data or insights are offered for the treatment of these diseases. Our attention was particularly drawn by Figure 9, which is partly based on data generated in a clinical study performed and published by our group.The original article article by Wang et al.

Background: Omalizumab has been introduced for treatment of severe steroid dependent asthma in Bulgaria since 2009. We analyzed its effectiveness in a patient population eligible for reimbursement according the National Health Insurance Fund criteria. Methods: We reviewed the records of all asthmatics put on omlizumab treatment through an established selection process in one of the 2 centers in the country. The variables included demographic data, disease and smoking history, spirometry, total IgE, blood eosinophils, success of treatment as judged by patients and doctors, discontinuation of systemic steroids, adverse events. Results: A total of 76 patients (52 women, 68%) on omalizumab had data from at least two visits 6 months apart. All were atopic with total IgE ranging from 81 to 1466 (median 302) IU/mL. Baseline FEV1 % predicted was 47.7%±5.8% [mean±s.e.m.] and blood eosinophils 410±48 cells/mcL. 13 patients (17%) discontinued treatment: 9 patients not experiencing subjective improvement, 3 patients having no effect as judged by their doctors, and 1 patient because of anaphylaxis. Binary logistic regression associated success of treatment positively with age and negatively with preceding asthma duration and pack years of smoking: odds ratio for success in relation to age was 1.065, 95% CI [1.004-1.130], P=0.04; to asthma duration 0.951 [0.904-1.001], P=0.05; to pack years 0.927 [0.864 -0.995], P=0.04. Conclusions: The majority (83%) of consecutive severe asthmatics on omalizumab in real-life patient population met the goals of treatment, with age as positive predictor of success; asthma duration and smoking were associated with the odds of failure.

Background Many physicians believe that the most effective way to treat chronic urticaria is to take a nonsedating second-generation H1-antihistamine in the morning and a sedating first-generation H1-antihistamine, usually hydroxyzine, at night to enhance sleep. But is this belief well founded? Objectives To test this belief by comparing the effectiveness and prevalence of unwanted sedative effects when treating patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) with levocetirizine 15 mg daily plus hydroxyzine 50 mg at night (levocetirizine plus hydroxyzine) vs. levocetirizine 20 mg daily (levocetirizine monotherapy). Methods In this randomized, double-blind, cross-over study, 24 patients with difficult-to-treat CSU took levocetirizine plus hydroxyzine or levocetirizine monotherapy for periods of 5 days each. At the end of each treatment period, assessments were made of quality of life (Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire, CU-Q2oL), severity of urticaria symptoms (Urticaria Activity Score, UAS), sleep disturbance during the night and daytime somnolence. Results Both treatments significantly decreased UAS, night-time sleep disturbances and CU-Q2oL scores (P < 0·001) without significant differences between the two. Compared with baseline, daytime somnolence was significantly reduced by levocetirizine monotherapy (P = 0·006) but not by levocetirizine plus hydroxyzine (P = 0·218). Direct comparison of the two treatment modalities in terms of daytime somnolence favoured levocetirizine monotherapy (P = 0·026). Conclusions The widespread belief that sleep is aided by the addition of a sedating first-generation H1-antihistamine, usually hydroxyzine, at night is not supported. These results are in line with the urticaria guidelines, which state that first-line treatment for urticaria should be new-generation, nonsedating H1-antihistamines only.

Background Different conditions make the proximal airways susceptible to tussigenic stimuli in the chronic cough (CC) syndrome. Leukotrienes can be implicated in the inflammatory mechanism at play in it. Montelukast is a selective cysteinyl-leukotriene receptor antagonist with proven effectiveness in patients with asthma. The aim of our real-life pilot study was to use montelukast to relieve cough symptoms in patients with CC allegedly due to the two frequent causes other than asthma – upper airway cough syndrome and gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Methods 14 consecutive patients with CC were evaluated before and after 2 weeks of treatment with montelukast 10 mg daily. Cough was assessed by validated cough questionnaire. Questionnaires regarding the presence of gastroesophageal reflux were also completed. Cough reflex sensitivity to incremental doubling concentrations of citric acid and capsaicin was measured. Lung function, airway hyperresponsiveness and exhaled breath temperature (EBT), a non-invasive marker of lower airway inflammation, were evaluated to exclude asthma as an underlying cause. Thorough upper-airway examination was also conducted. Cell counts, eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), lactoferrin, myeloperoxidase (MPO) were determined in blood to assess systemic inflammation. Results Discomfort due to cough was significantly reduced after treatment (P

Background In an attempt to establish how treatment with inhaled extra-fine beclomethasone/formoterol (I-EF-BDP/F) formulation differs from other combinations of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and long acting beta-agonist (LABA), we studied lung function and markers of airway inflammation upon switching to the extra-fine formulation and after 8 weeks of treatment with it. Methods We carried out a real-life clinical observation of undercontrolled asthmatic patients switched over from dry powder inhalers of fluticasone/salmeterol and budesonide/formoterol to I-EF-BDP/F (Foster®, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Italy). The effects of 8-weeks of treatment were documented by means of visual analog scale (VAS), quality of life by Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), spirometry and markers of airway or systemic inflammation: exhaled breath temperature (EBT), blood eosinophils (Eos), and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP). Before/after treatment differences between forced vital capacity percent of predicted (%FVC), a simple indicator of small airways involvement, were calculated and subjects were ranked accordingly to reflect the magnitude of the therapeutic response. Subjects above the 75th percentile (n = 15), “top responders”, were then compared with those below the 25th percentile (n = 15) “poor responders”. Results On average, the 59 patients completing the study (mean age± SD 51 ± 12 years, 38 women) had significant improvement in VAS and QLQ scores at the end of the treatment period (49.1 ± 2.4 vs. 73.1 ± 2.05 and 146.1 ± 2.7 vs. 176.7.1 ± 3.4 respectively, P

Background The proportion of patients visiting general practitioners (GPs), otorhinolaryngologists (ORLs), and allergologists (ALRGs) for nasal complaints is unknown but important in estimating the number of subjects with nasal symptoms bothersome enough to warrant physician consultations and assessing nasal pathological conditions' burden on a national health care system. Objective The Symptoms of Nasal Inconvenience Fact Finding (SNIFF) survey was developed to (1) assess incidence of physician visits attributable to nasal complaints; (2) characterize patients' nasal conditions; and (3) outline differences across physician categories. Methods The SNIFF survey was completed over 20 days by Bulgarian GPs, ORLs, and ALRGs whom patients consulted for nasal symptoms. Survey forms differentiated type and severity of patients' conditions according to Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines and ranked bothersome symptoms. Smell impairment, comorbidities, and prescription practices were documented. Results Sixty-nine physicians (30 GPs, 8 ORLs, 31 ALRGs) completed 1,685 surveys. The proportion of patients with nasal symptoms over the total patients seen was 15.7%: ALRGs, 18.0%; GPs, 14.6%; ORLs, 13.1%. Patients were classified as having intermittent (38.8%) or persistent (61.2%) rhinitis, with most having moderate/severe symptoms (94.4%). Congestion was the leading symptom in 59.1%. Smell was impaired in 69.8% of patients, asthma was present in 21.4%, and cough in 62.9%. ALRGs were more likely to diagnose and manage patients per ARIA guidelines than were ORLs or GPs. Conclusion The SNIFF survey results demonstrate congestion's role as a leading symptom motivating patients to seek medical advice. SNIFF also uncovered differences in practices among different categories of health care providers.

Background H 1 -antihistamines are first line treatment of chronic urticaria, but many patients do not get satisfactory relief with recommended doses. European guidelines recommend increased antihistamine doses of up to 4-fold. Objective To provide supportive evidence for the European guidelines. Methods Eighty tertiary referral patients with chronic urticaria (age range, 19-67 years) were randomized for double-blind treatment with levocetirizine or desloratadine (40/40). Treatment started at the conventional daily dose of 5 mg and then increased weekly to 10 mg, 20 mg, or 20 mg of the opposite drug if relief of symptoms was incomplete. Wheal and pruritus scores, quality of life, patient discomfort, somnolence, and safety were assessed. Results Thirteen patients became symptom-free at 5 mg (9 levocetirizine vs 4 desloratadine), compared with 28 subjects on the higher doses of 10 mg (8/7) and 20 mg (5/1). Of the 28 patients nonresponsive to 20 mg desloratadine, 7 became symptom-free with 20 mg levocetirizine. None of the 18 levocetirizine nonresponders benefited with 20 mg desloratadine. Increasing antihistamine doses improved quality of life but did not increase somnolence. Analysis of the effect of treatment on discomfort caused by urticaria showed great individual heterogeneity of antihistamine responsiveness: ∼15% of patients were good responders, ∼10% were nonresponders, and ∼75% were responders to higher than conventional antihistamine doses. No serious or severe adverse effects warranting discontinuation of treatment occurred with either drug. Conclusion Increasing the dosage of levocetirizine and desloratadine up to 4-fold improves chronic urticaria symptoms without compromising safety in approximately three quarters of patients with difficult-to-treat chronic urticaria.

Nonallergic rhinitis is a complex of syndromes that are united by the absence of atopic, T(H)2 lymphocyte, immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated mechanisms. We propose a classification system based on the presence or absence of inflammatory granulocytes. Eosinophilic nonallergic rhinosinusitis may also be called chronic eosinophilic sinusitis syndromes (CESS) to help classify these disorders in which diverse mechanisms of eosinophil chemoattraction and survival predominate. Allergic fungal sinusitis, eosinophilic nasal polyps, aspirin sensitivity, and related disorders would fit in this category. Accumulation of neutrophils occurs in chronic infectious rhinosinusitis, foreign body reactions, and immunodeficiencies. More complex and variable combinations of leukocytes are found in Wegner's granulomatosis and related syndromes, and during the evolution of viral infections. The noninflammatory disorders can be divided by mechanism into hormonal; sympathetic dysfunction (including antihypertensive adrenergic drug therapy); cholinergic rhinitis; and nociceptive syndromes with hyperalgesia and other features (eg, the nonallergic rhinitis of chronic fatigue syndrome). Therapy based on the most likely pathophysiologic mechanism is anticipated to have the most success, but requires acceptance of the wide differential diagnosis of nonallergic rhinitis and rejection of the obsolete term of "vasomotor rhinitis."

The nose and pharynx begin the upper airway system and represent a continuum. This is the biologic basis for the mutual influences of rhinitis and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Sleep-disordered breathing has a large differential diagnosis that includes snoring, upper airway resistance syndrome, and severe OSA. Nasal obstruction is an independent risk factor for OSA, but there is no correlation of daytime nasal resistance with the severity of OSA. However, nasal resistance was an independent predictor of apnea-hypopnea index in a recent study of nonobese OSA patients. Rhinitis alone is associated with mild OSA, but commonly causes microarousals and sleep fragmentation. Reduction of nasal inflammation with topical treatment improves sleep quality and subsequent daytime sleepiness and fatigue. Patient compliance with the nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) device is relatively low, in part due to adverse nasal effects.

Triazole antifungals are commonly used in the treatment of candidiasis. Fluconazole (FCZ) is one of the most frequently prescribed therapy for vaginal fungal infections. Rarely, FCZ has been shown to cause fixed drug eruptions (FDE).

Rationale Since there is no data about persistent allergic and non-allergic asthma and rhinitis association as well as sensitization among Bulgarian patient population, we assessed this co-morbidity and the major allergen sensitization in our country. Methods A sample of 317 proven perennial asthma and/or rhinitis patients underwent skin prick testing (SPT) to house dust mites, cockroaches, moulds, dog, cat and pollens with commercially available allergen extracts (Allerbio). Results The majority of patients in our series 185 (58%) were atopic and had at least one positive skin test to major inhalant allergens. The mean age of the patients in allergic group was 34,8 (from 5 to 59) with 43%:56% men:women ratio versus 44,1 (from 6 to 79) in the non-allergic group with 30%:70% men:women ratio. In the allergic group 87% of asthmatics suffered from accompanying rhinitis versus 79% in the non-allergic group. A subgroup of 9 (5,3%) asthmatics had nasal polyps and aspirin sensitivity and 11 (6,5%) had only polyps as a concomitant disorder. Accompanying seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis proven with positive SPT to pollens was assessed in 55% of atopic patients. The sensitization to the inhalant allergens in the allergic group was as follows: D. pteronyssinus 60%, D. farinae 52%, dog 34%, cat 31%, Blatella germanica 26%, Periplaneta americana 22%, Alternaria mix 19%, Fusarium moniliforme 18%, Penicillium digihetum 10%. Conclusions Both persistent allergic rhinitis and non-allergic rhino(sinusitis) showed a frequent association with persistent asthma. Polysensitization was a characteristic feature for 82% of patient sample and house dust mites and pets were among the most common allergens causing sensitization.

Background In an attempt to circumvent low response rates and high cost of classical epidemiological trials, we carried out a real-life survey among practicing physicians consulting patients for nasal symptoms. In this fragment of our work we analyze similarities and differences between children and adults and within the different strata of pediatric age.Methods A survey was carried out by 69 physicians across Bulgaria (general practitioners, allergists and otorhinolaryngologists) and made possible calculation of the proportion of subjects with nasal symptoms from all other patients seen. Its structure allowed classification of rhinitis according the ARIA guidelines.Results Out of the 1685 completed survey forms, 506 pertained to the age group below 18 years. The gender predominance differed in children and adults: 57.3 % vs. 42.8 % of males respectively, P < 0.001. The prevalence of persistent rhinitis in children was 55.7 %, lower than in adults, 63.3 %, P = 0.004. In both pediatric and adult patients moderately severe and severe forms of rhinitis prevailed, 93.7 % vs. 94.6 %, with nasal obstruction as leading symptom: 59.9 % vs. 58.8 %. Cough was significantly more prevalent among children, 72.5 %, gradually decreasing until reaching adulthood, 58.7 %, P < 0.001. Prevalence of doctor diagnosed asthma was also higher among children, 25.1 %, than in adults, 19.5 %, P = 0.011. A gradient for characteristics, which were different in children, emerged across the pediatric age strata.Discussion Our study uses an unorthodox design targeting the patient population visiting physicians’ offices because of nasal symptoms, achieving a much higher level of credibility of the results at minimal expense. As we base our survey on international guidelines, we believe this approach demonstrates the applicability of such consensus documents for practical purposes when in the hands of qualified physicians.Conclusions Moderate and severe rhinitis symptoms motivate patients and their guardians to seek medical advice. While nasal congestion is a leading bothersome symptom in both adults and children, specific other features characterize the pediatric age and differ across its strata. Keywords: Allergic rhinitis, Asthma, Children, Nasal symptoms, Treatment practices

Lamotrigine (LTG), an aromatic antiepileptic drug, is mainly used to manage epilepsy and bipolar / mood disorders. Skin rashes are the most common adverse reaction to this drug that typically develop in the first 8 weeks of treatment.