Search

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare neoplasms with a wide spectrum of clinical behavior, from the long survival of well-differentiated NETs to the dismal prognosis of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), being G3 NETs a recently recognized intermediate entity. While the role of chemotherapy is well established in NECs, data on NETs mostly derives from small studies, experts’ opinions, and extrapolating results from small-cell lung cancer studies. This narrative review aims to summarize available evidence about the use of chemotherapy in the setting of G1-2 NETs and G3 NETs. We performed literature research in PubMed Library for all articles published up to September 2022 about the efficacy of chemotherapy in NETs. Treatment regimens with STZ-5FU, CAPTEM, and anti-metabolite-based treatment are the most active and tolerated in gastroenteropancreatic NETs (GEP-NETs) G1-G2, while platinum-based regimens (FOLFOX/XELOX) and TEM/CAPTEM showed the best activity in thoracic NETs. Solid evidence about chemotherapy efficacy in G3 NETs is still lacking. Literature data support the use of chemotherapy in low-intermediate grade NETs after the failure of other therapies or if tumor shrinkage is needed. Studies assessing G3 NETs independently from NECs are needed to better understand the role of chemotherapy in this setting.

Introduction: Lanreotide autogel (LAN) and temozolomide (TMZ) are guidelines-recommended monotherapies for thoracic neuroendocrine tumors (carcinoids; T-NETs), but prospective data for both combined and monotherapies are lacking. ATLANT (NCT02698410) evaluated efficacy and safety of LAN/TMZ in progressive T-NETs. Methods: ATLANT was a 12-month, Italian, phase 2, single-arm, open-label, multicenter pilot study. Eligible patients had unresectable, locally advanced/metastatic, well-/moderately differentiated T-NETs with radiological progression. Patients received subcutaneous LAN 120 mg every 28 days and oral TMZ 250 mg/day for 5 consecutive days every 28-day cycle. Main endpoints are disease control rate (DCR) at 9 months (primary; investigator-assessed), median progression-free survival (PFS), biomarkers, and safety. Results: The number of patients was 40; 60% were male. Primary tumor site was lung (90%) and thymus (10%). Carcinoid type was typical (20.0%) and atypical (52.5%). DCR at 9 months was 35.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) 20.63–51.68; nonacceptability threshold ≤10%, p < 0.0001; not significantly above clinically relevant threshold ≥30%, p = 0.2968). DCR between 7.5 and 10.5 months (sensitivity analysis) was 45.0% (95% CI: 29.26–61.51) and clinically relevant (p = 0.0320 at ≥30% threshold). Median PFS was 37.1 (95% CI: 24.1–52.9) weeks. No association was observed between biomarker variations (chromogranin A, neuron-specific enolase, somatostatin receptor type-2, Ki-67, 6-O-methylguanine-DNA-methyl-transferase) and DCR or PFS. Most patients (97.5%) had treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); 72.5% had treatment-related TEAEs. TEAEs were mainly grade 1/2. No unanticipated TEAEs were reported. Conclusions: This study showed that the LAN/TMZ combination has promising efficacy in progressive T-NETs, and was well tolerated. Larger studies are warranted to support the clinical benefits of LAN/TMZ in patients with T-NETs.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the seventh leading cause of cancer death in the world and the most common type pf pancreatic cancer. Unfortunately, less than 20% of patients are surgically resectable and the great majority of cases are treated with palliative chemotherapy with unsatisfactory results. No targeted agents or personalized approaches have been validated in the last decades. On the other side, neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas are generally considered indolent tumours. However, high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma is a rare subtype of neuroendocrine neoplasm of the pancreas (accounting up to 10% of the neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas), with particularly aggressive behaviour and poor prognosis. Even in this case, the treatment is represented by palliative chemotherapy with dismal results and no personalized therapies are available, so far. Notably, the quality of life of these patients is disappointingly low and the future perspectives of more personalized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are scarce. In this review, we discuss relevant and current information on epidemiology, pathology, diagnosis, clinical presentation, treatment and ongoing clinical trials of these two entities, in order to illustrate the two sides of the moon.

Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare thyroid carcinoma with a variable clinical behavior. Potential clinical and pathological prognostic markers have been investigated, but studies are limited and controversial. In neuroendocrine neoplasms of various other sites, necrosis and proliferation (mitotic activity and/or Ki67 index) are integrated to provide a histological grade. Recently, an International Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Grading System (IMTCGS) has been designed to define high- or low-grade MTC by combining proliferative activity and necrosis. This proposal integrates two previously published grading schemes by American (2-tiered grading, low- and high-grade MTC) and Australian authors (3-tiered grading, low-, intermediate-, and high-grade MTC). To validate the clinical role of these systems, their prognostic impact was evaluated in an independent cohort of 111 MTCs. Necrosis, which was the only parameter integrated into the 3 grading systems, proved to be individually correlate with tumor relapse, while no association was found with the proliferation (mitotic count and Ki67 index); however, by combining the different parameters according to all three grading systems, "high-grade" MTCs turned out to be significantly associated with the disease recurrence (p 0.005) in all systems. In disease-free survival analysis, the IMTCGS stratification was the only one that demonstrated a significant impact at Cox regression analysis (p = 0.004), further confirmed by the Kaplan-Meier curves (p = 0.002). Similar findings were also reproduced when analysis was restricted to sporadic MTCs (68 cases). In conclusion, our results confirm the prognostic role of IMTCGS, supporting the importance of incorporating this information into the pathology report. However, none of the systems proved to predict the overall survival in this validation cohort.

Purpose Well-differentiated lung neuroendocrine tumors (Lu-NET) are classified as typical (TC) and atypical (AC) carcinoids, based on mitotic counts and necrosis. However, prognostic factors, other than tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage and the histopathological diagnosis, are still lacking. The current study is aimed to identify potential prognostic factors to better stratify lung NET, thus, improving patients’ treatment strategy and follow-up. Methods A multicentric retrospective study, including 300 Lung NET, all surgically removed, from Italian and Spanish Institutions. Results Median age 61 years (13-86), 37.7% were males, 25.0% were AC, 42.0% were located in the lung left parenchyma, 80.3% presented a TNM stage I-II. Mitotic count was ≥2 per 10 high power field (HPF) in 24.7%, necrosis in 13.0%. Median overall survival (OS) was 46.1 months (0.6-323), median progression free survival (PFS) was 36.0 months (0.3-323). Female sex correlated with a more indolent disease (T1; N0; lower Ki67; lower mitotic count and the absence of necrosis). Left-sided primary tumors were associated with higher mitotic count and necrosis. At Cox multivariate regression model, age, left-sided tumors and nodal (N) positive status resulted independent negative prognostic factors for OS and PFS. Conclusions This study confirms the prognostic relevance of TNM stage and diagnosis to stratify LuNET. However, the current analysis suggests a wider spectrum of clinical and pathological prognostic factors, including age and primary tumor’s location. These parameters could help clinicians to personalize the management of Lu-NET.

Purpose Neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) has been displaying an incremental trend along the last two decades. This phenomenon is poorly understood, and little information is available on risk factor for neuroendocrine neoplasia development. Aim of this work is to elucidate the role of potentially modifiable risk factors for pancreatic and pulmonary NEN. Methods We conducted a case–control study on 184 patients with NEN (100 pancreas and 84 lung) and 248 controls. The structured questionnaire included 84 queries on socio-demographic, behavioral, dietary and clinical information. Results Increased risk was associated with history of cancer (“other tumor”, lung OR = 7.18; 95% CI: 2.55–20.20 and pancreas OR = 5.88; 95% CI: 2.43–14.22; “family history of tumor”, lung OR = 2.66; 95% CI: 1.53–4.64 and pancreas OR = 1.94; 95% CI: 1.19–3.17; “family history of lung tumor”, lung OR = 2.56; 95% CI: 1.05–6.24 and pancreas OR = 2.60; 95% CI: 1.13–5.95). Type 2 diabetes mellitus associated with an increased risk of pancreatic NEN (OR = 3.01; 95% CI: 1.15–7.89). Conclusions Besides site-specific risk factors, there is a significant link between neuroendocrine neoplasia and cancer in general, pointing to a shared cancer predisposition.

Introduction: Cabozantinib has been approved by the European Medicine Agency (EMA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) previously treated with sorafenib. Cabozantinib is also being tested in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the frontline setting. Real-life clinical data of cabozantinib for HCC are still lacking. Moreover, the prognostic factors for HCC treated with cabozantinib have not been investigated. Methods: We evaluated clinical data and outcome of HCC patients who received cabozantinib in the legal context of named patient use in Italy. Results: Ninety-six patients from 15 centres received cabozantinib. All patients had preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A), mostly with an advanced HCC (77.1%) in a third-line setting (75.0%). The prevalence of performance status (PS) > 0, macrovascular invasion (MVI), extrahepatic spread, and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) >400 ng/mL was 50.0, 30.2, 67.7, and 44.8%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were 12.1 (95% confidence interval 9.4–14.8) and 5.1 (3.3–6.9) months, respectively. Most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (67.7%), diarrhoea (54.2%), anorexia (45.8%), HFSR (43.8%), weight loss (24.0%), and hypertension (24.0%). Most common treatment-related Grade 3–4 AEs were fatigue (6.3%), HFSR (6.3%), and increased aminotransferases (6.3%). MVI, ECOG-PS > 0, and AFP >400 ng/mL predicted a worse OS. Discontinuation for intolerance and no new extrahepatic lesions at the progression were associated with better outcomes. Conclusions: In a real-life Western scenario (mostly in a third-line setting), cabozantinib efficacy and safety data were comparable with those reported in its registration trial. Data regarding the prognostic factors might help in patient selection and design of clinical trials.

Introduction The organization of the healthcare system has significantly changed after the recent COVID-19 outbreak, with a negative impact on the management of oncological patients. The present survey reports data collected by the Italian Association for Neuroendocrine Tumors on the management of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) during the pandemic dissemination. Methods A survey with 57 questions was sent to NEN-dedicated Italian centers regarding the management of patients in the period March 9, 2020, to May 9, 2020 Results The main modification in the centers’ activity consisted of decreases in newly diagnosed NEN patients (− 76.8%), decreases in performed surgical procedures (− 58%), delays to starting peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (45.5%), postponed/canceled follow-up examinations (26%), and canceled multidisciplinary teams’ activity (20.8%). A low proportion of centers (

Breast carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation, also known as neuroendocrine breast carcinoma (NEBC), includes a heterogeneous group of rare tumors, which account for 2–5% of all invasive breast carcinomas. Because of their low incidence, most of the current limited knowledge of these tumors derives from anecdotal case reports or small retrospective series. The diagnosis of NEBC is based on the presence of morphological features similar to gastrointestinal and lung NETs and neuroendocrine markers. NEBCs are usually hormone receptors positive and HER2 negative, but despite this luminal phenotype, most recent studies suggested that NEBC could be associated with worse prognosis compared to invasive breast cancer without neuroendocrine differentiation. Due to its rarity and lack of randomized data, there is little evidence to guide the choice of treatment, so NEBC is currently treated as any invasive breast carcinoma not-otherwise specified. Recently, attempts to molecularly characterize NEBC have been made, in order to provide new targets for a more personalized treatment of this uncommon entity.

There is scant evidence about optimal management of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma of the bladder (BNEC). We performed a multicenter retrospective study on BNEC patients from 13 Italian neuroendocrine-dedicated centers to analyze strategies associated with better outcomes. Mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinomas (MANEC) were included. We analyzed overall survival (OS) in the overall cohort, relapse-free survival (RFS) in radically operated patients and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients who received chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Fifty-one BNEC patients were included (male: 46, median age: 70 years). Overall, median OS was 16.0 months, radical tumor resection was performed in 37 patients (72.5%) and 11 of these (29.7%) also received peri-operative platinum-etoposide chemotherapy. Median OS was longer in patients with better performance status (PS) and in those with stage I&ndash, III disease at diagnosis compared to stage IV. Among patients who underwent radical tumor resection (N = 37), RFS was longer in patients with better PS and showed a trend towards a longer RFS in those treated with peri-operative chemotherapy than with surgery alone (11 vs. 6 months, p = 0.078). Among 28 patients receiving chemotherapy for metastatic disease, PFS was 5.0 months and there was a trend towards improved PFS in patients receiving carboplatin-etoposide chemotherapy compared to other regimens. A multivariate model unmasked a significant association between carboplatin-etoposide chemotherapy and risk for disease progression or death (HR: 0.39 (95%CI: 0.16&ndash, 0.96) p = 0.040). Performance status might be associated with improved RFS in radically operated patients, while type of chemotherapy might affect PFS in patients receiving chemotherapy for metastatic BNEC.

Background Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) include malignancies with different origins, clinical presentations and prognosis. Synchronous or metachronous ocular metastases from NET are extremely rare. The diagnostic algorithm and the management of this entity has not been established. The aim of our study was to characterize this subgroup. Methods We performed an electronic search in PubMed Library databases for articles about ocular metastases from NET published from 1966 to August 2019. Results We identified 21 manuscripts with a total of 64 cases. The primary origin of the tumor was lung in 28 (43.7%) cases, ileum in 14, unknown in 8, colon in 3, rectum, esophagus, thymus, testicle and liver in 1 case each, and not reported in 6. The histopathological confirmation of NET metastasis was available in 25 cases (39%). The most common sites of intraocular lesions was the uvea in 30 (46.8%) cases, followed by the orbit in 27. Most of the patients (n = 44, 68.7%) presented eye symptoms. Locoregional interventions were performed in 40 patients (62.5%): 15 cases underwent surgery, 19 had external beam radiotherapy, 5 had brachytherapy, and 1 patient received laser photocoagulation. These treatments ensured the local control in 28 of the 40 (70%) cases treated with a locoregional approach. Conclusions Ocular metastases from NETs are exceptionally rare, and originate more frequently from foregut primary tumors (lung, esophageal, and thymic NETs). The most common ocular site of secondary lesions is the uvea, likely due to its high vascularization. Locoregional approaches appear to be effective in terms of local disease control.

Purpose To evaluate the antiproliferative activity and safety of nonconventional high doses of somatostatin analogs (HD-SSA) in patients with well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NET) with radiological disease progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria on a previous treatment. Methods A retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained databases from 13 Italian NET-dedicated centers was performed. Main inclusion criteria were: well-differentiated G1 or G2 GEP-NET, progressive disease on a previous treatment, and subsequent treatment with HD-SSA (either by increased administered dose [dose intensity] or shortened interval between administrations [dose density]). Main endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Results Of 198 patients, 140 matched inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Overall, median PFS was 31 months. Use of HD-SSA as second-line treatment was associated with reduced risk for progression or death compared with third- or further-line treatment (HR: 2.12; P = 0.004). There was no difference in PFS between HD-SSA by increased dose density (N = 133; 95%) or intensity (N = 7; 5%). Partial response according to RECIST criteria was observed in 12 patients (8.6%), and stable disease was achieved in 106 (75.7%) patients. Adverse events occurred in 21 patients (15.0%), 2 of whom had grade 3 biliary stone disease. No patients discontinued HD-SSA treatment due to adverse events. Conclusions HD-SSA is an active and safe treatment option in patients with progressive well-differentiated GEP-NET. The high rate of objective responses observed deserves prospective validation in ad hoc clinical trials.

The available fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin combinations for colorectal cancer patients have different safety profiles. The aim of this systematic review was to compare their toxicities. The eligible studies were classified as: no bolus; 5-FU single bolus; 5-FU double bolus; capecitabine. We calculated the incidence of "any-grade" and "severe" toxicity for haematological and non-haematological adverse events of each group. We identified 184 treatment groups; compared to 5-FU double bolus, except for high-grade anaemia, all the groups showed reduced risk of haematological toxicities, with the most relevant advantages for single bolus regimens. Concerning non-haematological toxicities, compared to double bolus, the single bolus group showed a statistically significant reduced risk for many gastrointestinal toxicities and for pheripheral neuropathy. This is the first systematic review of the toxicity profile of different 5-FU or capecitabine and oxaliplatin regimens. Single 5-FU bolus is associated with a definitely favourable toxicity profile, both for haematological and non-haematological toxicity.

Monoclonal antibodies to somatostatin receptors 2A (SSTR2A, UMB-1) and 5 (SSTR5, UMB-4) were reported to be highly reliable for immunohistochemical detection of these receptors in neuroendocrine neoplasms. However, the standardization of either the immunohistochemical procedure and the methods of evaluation has yet to be established. Fifty-two tissues from 38 patients with neuroendocrine neoplasm were retrieved from 2 institutions in Italy and Japan. The tissues were immunostained using 3 staining methodologies: 1 automated and 2 manual protocols from the Italian and Japanese institutions. The slides were independently evaluated by 3 observers (2 experienced pathologists and 1 medical student) using 3 scoring systems (Volante-Score, HER2-Score, and H-Score). The scores obtained from the staining methods were highly correlated with each other (r0.85, P.0001). Especially, the Volante- and HER2-Scores were highly concordant (r≥0.95, P≤.0001). Very high interobserver agreement was obtained irrespective of the method used and the experience of the evaluator, with the best concordance obtained by experienced pathologists evaluating automated system-stained slides (SSTR2A, r0.97; SSTR5, r0.96). HER2- and H-Scores were reliable to represent the characteristics of the patients. SSTR2A expression evaluated by the HER2-Score was significantly associated with clinical efficacy to somatostatin analogs (P=.04). SSTRs determination is an easily standardizable tool in different laboratories and is highly reproducible irrespective of the method of evaluation used. Given the positive association with clinical efficacy to somatostatin analogs, as well as the simple and widespread use, HER2-Score can be proposed as a standard evaluation procedure of SSTR2A and SSTR5 expression in neuroendocrine neoplasms.

The aim of this work is to assess if cumulative dose (CD) and dose intensity (DI) of everolimus may affect survival of advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) patients. One hundred and sixteen patients (62 males and 54 females, median age 55 years) with advanced PNETs were treated with everolimus for ≥3 months. According to a Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, patients were stratified into two groups, with CD ≤ 3000 mg (Group A; n = 68) and CD > 3000 mg (Group B; n = 48). The response rate and toxicity were comparable in the two groups. However, patients in group A experienced more dose modifications than patients in group B. Median OS was 24 months in Group A while in Group B it was not reached (HR: 26.9; 95% CI: 11.0–76.7; P

TPS4167 Background: Well-differentiated (WD) NETs are a group of rare neoplasms with limited therapeutic options. New combinations of somatostatin analogs (SSAs) and investigational drugs are warranted to improve clinical outcomes. Cabozantinib (CAB) is an orally administered inhibitor of multiple tyrosine kinases, including c-MET and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 (VEGFR2), with a pivotal role in NET pathogenesis. The biological rationale of the synergistic effects of CAB plus SSAs lies in the concomitant modulation of the RAS/MAPK and PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathways both at the level of cancer cells and tumor stroma, leading to enhanced anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic effects. CAB exhibited encouraging activity in a recent phase II trial of patients with progressive carcinoids and pancreatic (p)NETs (Chan JA et al. JCO 2017; 35:4_suppl, 228-228). The LOLA trial is the first prospective phase II study aiming to assess the safety and activity of CAB in combination with lanreotide (LAN) in WD NETs of GEP, thoracic and of unknown origin. Clinical trial information: NCT04427787. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, double-cohort, non comparative, non-randomized, three-stage phase II trial. Eligible patients have to meet the following inclusion criteria: diagnosis of advanced or metastatic, progressive, non-functioning WD thoracic NETs, GEP-NETs or NETs of unknown origin with Ki67 ≥10%; positive 68Ga-PET uptake or somatostatin receptor 2 immunohistochemical (IHC) stain; maximum 1 prior systemic regimen for metastatic disease. Two cohorts will be considered: pNETs and carcinoids. In the stage I, the primary objective is to find the optimal dose of CAB in combination with LAN and to evaluate the safety of the combination (defined as the percentage of patients experiencing grade 3-5 toxicities according to NCI-CTCAE v5.0). Starting dose of CAB is 60 mg/day continuously, plus LAN 120 mg every 28 days. In stage II and III, co-primary endpoints are safety and overall response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v1.1. The useful antitumor activity to be detected is fixed in ORR > 20%. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival and overall survival. Exploratory objectives include the assessment of IHC expression of c-MET, AXL and VEGFR2, with the aim to identify predictive or prognostic tissue biomarkers. Enrolment started in July 2020, with an expected trial duration of 42 months comprehensive of accrual, treatment and follow-up. Considering a drop out rate of 5%, the maximum number of enrolled patients will be 69. Supported by a solid rationale, the trial has the potential to generate milestone data about the synergistic effects of CAB plus LAN in a group of NET patients with relatively aggressive disease and limited therapeutic options, for whom optimal treatment sequencing is not yet defined. Clinical trial information: NCT04427787.

Background Generic anticancer drugs represent an opportunity in terms of cost savings but there are some concerns about their tolerability. The safety profiles of generic versus branded oxaliplatin formulations have never been studied in detail. Patients and methods We tested in vitro concentrations, stability and efficacy of branded versus generic oxaliplatin formulations, then we retrospectively collected data about hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) of 427 colorectal cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based regimens. Results No significant difference in oxaliplatin concentration or time-dependent antiproliferative activity between branded and generic oxaliplatin was detected. The incidence of HSR was 12.1% (33/273 patients) in those treated with branded and 9.8% (15/154 patients) in those treated with generic oxaliplatin (p=0.46). The occurrence of grade III-IV HSRs and severe HSRs leading to oxaliplatin discontinuation were comparable. Conclusion No difference between generic and branded formulations of oxaliplatin were demonstrated in preclinical nor in clinical settings. Generic oxaliplatin can be considered a safe alternative to branded formulation.

Introduction: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a rare and heterogeneous group of tumours, with a variety of primary origins and variable aggressiveness. NENs with an atypical primary origin, such as breast and retroperitoneal NENs, are extremely rare. As a consequence, an established diagnostic and therapeutic strategy in this particular subgroup is lacking. The combination of capecitabine and temozolomide, called CAPTEM regimen, has produced promising response rates in patients with grade 1 or 2 neuroendocrine tumours of multiple origins. Case presentation: The first is a case of a 68-year-old woman with a metastatic primary breast neuroendocrine tumour, treated with cisplatin plus etoposide as first line, followed by CAV scheme (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine), and subsequently treated, in third line with the CAPTEM regimen, obtaining radiological response and good tolerance. The second is the case of a 66-year-old woman affected by a metastatic primitive retroperitoneal NET G2. The patient progressed after a somatostatin analogue-based first line, whereas the CAPTEM regimen led to a partial and durable response with a favourable safety profile. Conclusions: CAPTEM chemotherapy has been shown to be an active and safe therapeutic option in advanced, metastatic G1/2 atypical primary NENs.

Background Everolimus was recently approved for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. However, its efficacy and tolerability in hemodialysis patients with end-stage renal disease is not established. Case presentation We describe the case of a 47-year-old man with end-stage renal disease who received everolimus plus Lanreotide for 9 months for the management of metastatic atypical bronchial carcinoid. Conclusions Everolimus is a treatment option for hemodialysis patients with metastatic atypical bronchial carcinoid. Based on our case report and review of literature, Everolimus does not require any dose reductions and is overall well tolerated in hemodialysis patients.

No validated prognostic tool is available for predicting overall survival (OS) of patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WDNETs). This study, conducted in three independent cohorts of patients from five different European countries, aimed to develop and validate a classification prognostic score for OS in patients with stage IV WDNETs. We retrospectively collected data on 1387 patients: (i) patients treated at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori (Milan, Italy; n = 515); (ii) European cohort of rare NET patients included in the European RARECAREnet database (n = 457); (iii) Italian multicentric cohort of pancreatic NET (pNETs) patients treated at 24 Italian institutions (n = 415). The score was developed using data from patients included in cohort (i) (training set); external validation was performed by applying the score to the data of the two independent cohorts (ii) and (iii) evaluating both calibration and discriminative ability (Harrell C statistic). We used data on age, primary tumor site, metastasis (synchronous vs metachronous), Ki-67, functional status and primary surgery to build the score, which was developed for classifying patients into three groups with differential 10-year OS: (I) favorable risk group: 10-year OS ≥70%; (II) intermediate risk group: 30% ≤ 10-year OS

BACKGROUND: There are no data from prospective studies focused exclusively on patients with advanced lung and thymic carcinoids. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of long-acting pasireotide and everolimus, administered alone or in combination, in patients with advanced carcinoids of the lung or thymus.METHODS: LUNA was a prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial of adult patients (aged >18 years) with advanced (unresectable or metastatic), well differentiated carcinoid tumours of the lung or thymus, with radiological progression within 12 months before randomisation, and a WHO performance status of 0-2. At each centre, the investigator or their designee registered each patient using an interactive voice recognition system into one of the three treatment groups. The randomisation allocation sequence was generated by an external company; patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive treatment with long-acting pasireotide (60 mg intramuscularly every 28 days), everolimus (10 mg orally once daily), or both in combination, for the core 12-month treatment period. Patients were stratified by carcinoid type (typical vs atypical) and line of study treatment (first line vs others). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients progression-free at month 9, defined as the proportion of patients with overall lesion assessment at month 9 showing a complete response, partial response, or stable disease according to local Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01563354. The extension phase of the study is ongoing.FINDINGS: Between Aug 16, 2013, and Sept 30, 2014, 124 patients were enrolled from 36 centres in nine countries: 41 were allocated to the long-acting pasireotide group, 42 to the everolimus group, and 41 to the combination group. At month 9, the proportion of patients with an overall lesion assessment of complete response, partial response, or stable disease was 16 of 41 patients (39·0%, 95% CI 24·2-55·5) in the long-acting pasireotide group, 14 of 42 patients (33·3%, 19·6-49·5) in the everolimus group, and 24 of 41 patients (58·5%, 42·1-73·7) in the combination group. The most common grade 1-2 adverse events with a suspected association with long-acting pasireotide monotherapy were diarrhoea (15 [37%] of 41), hyperglycaemia (17 [41%]), and weight loss (8 [20%]); those with a suspected association with everolimus monotherapy were stomatitis (26 [62%] of 42) and diarrhoea (16 [38%]); and those suspected to be associated with combination treatment were hyperglycaemia (27 [66%] of 41]), diarrhoea (19 [46%]), and asthenia (8 [20%]). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events with a suspected association with long-acting pasireotide monotherapy were γ-glutamyltransferase increased (four [10%] of 41 patients), diarrhoea (three [7%]), and hyperglycaemia (three [7%]); those for everolimus were hyperglycaemia (seven [17%] of 42 patients), stomatitis (four [10%]), and diarrhoea (three [7%]); those for combination treatment were hyperglycaemia (nine [22%] of 41 patients) and diarrhoea (four [10%]). 11 patients died during the core 12-month treatment phase or up to 56 days after the last study treatment exposure date: two (5%) of 41 in the long-acting pasireotide group, six (14%) of 42 in the everolimus group, and three (7%) of 41 in the combination group. No deaths were suspected to be related to long-acting pasireotide treatment. One death in the everolimus group (acute kidney injury associated with diarrhoea), and two deaths in the combination group (diarrhoea and urinary sepsis in one patient, and acute renal failure and respiratory failure in one patient) were suspected to be related to everolimus treatment. In the latter patient, acute renal failure was not suspected to be related to everolimus treatment, but respiratory failure was suspected to be related.INTERPRETATION: The study met the primary endpoint in all three treatment groups. Safety profiles were consistent with the known safety profiles of these agents. Further studies are needed to confirm the antitumour efficacy of the combination of a somatostatin analogue with everolimus in lung and thymic carcinoids.FUNDING: Novartis Pharma AG.

Background: Mixed neuroendocrine/nonneuroendocrine carcinomas are heterogeneous tumors with poorly defined diagnostic and clinical features and without pathological or molecular markers of prognosis or markers predicting their response to therapy. We aimed at analyzing the pathological features and the expression of genes involved in DNA repair or synthesis in a cohort of patients with mixed carcinomas from different sites as compared to the patients' outcome. Methods: Relative cDNA quantification of ribonucleotide reductase, large subunit 1, excision repair cross-complementation group 1, thymidylate synthase and topoisomerase IIa genes was tested using real-time PCR on microdissected neuroendocrine and nonneuroendocrine tumor components of 42 mixed cases (from the lung as well as the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts) and on 45 control cases of pure neuroendocrine and nonneuroendocrine carcinomas. Results: The expression levels of all genes were stable comparing nonneuroendocrine and neuroendocrine components of mixed cases (except for topoisomerase IIa in lung samples) but significantly different as compared to control nonneuroendocrine and neuroendocrine tumors. In the multivariate analysis including all clinical and pathological parameters and gene expression levels available, a predominant nonneuroendocrine component, the administration of additional therapy other than surgery and a high thymidylate synthase expression in nonneuroendocrine tumor tissue were significantly associated with a lower risk of a patient's death. Conclusions: Our data show that mixed neuroendocrine/nonneuroendocrine carcinomas are different at the molecular level from their pure neuroendocrine and nonneuroendocrine counterparts, and detailed analyses of their clinical, pathological and molecular features may improve the clinical strategies for the treatment of these rare and underestimated tumors.

Introduction Besides data reported in a Phase-III trial, data on sunitinib in pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (panNETs) are scanty. Aim To evaluate sunitinib efficacy and tolerability in panNETs patients treated in a real-world setting. Patients and methods Retrospective analysis of progressive panNETs treated with sunitinib. Efficacy was assessed by evaluating progression-free survival, overall survival, and disease control (DC) rate (stable disease (SD) + partial response + complete response). Data are reported as median (25th–75th IQR). Results Eighty patients were included. Overall, 71.1% had NET G2, 26.3% had NET G1, and 2.6% had NET G3 neoplasms. A total of 53 patients (66.3%) had received three or more therapeutic regimens before sunitinib, with 24 patients (30%) having been treated with four previous treatments. Median PFS was 10 months. Similar risk of progression was observed between NET G1 and NET G2 tumors (median PFS 11 months and 8 months, respectively), and between patients who had received ≥ 3 vs ≤ 2 therapeutic approaches before sunitinib (median PFS 9 months and 10 months, respectively). DC rate was 71.3% and SD was the most frequent observed response, occurring in 43 pts (53.8%). Overall, 59 pts (73.8%) experienced AEs, which were grade 1–2 in 43 of them (72.9%), grade 3 in 15 pts (25.4%), and grade 4 in one patient (1.7%). Six pts (7.5%) stopped treatment due to toxicity. Conclusions The present real-world experience shows that sunitinib is a safe and effective treatment for panNETs, even in the clinical setting of heavily pre-treated, progressive diseases.

Background Adenocarcinomas of the oral cavity are rare neoplasms, and only four cases of primary colonic adenocarcinoma of the tongue have ever been described in literature. Very few information about chemotherapy sensitiveness of this type of neoplasia is available, with only one regimen that showed some activity in a metastatic patient. Case presentation We describe the case of a patient bearing a metastatic colonic adenocarcinoma of the tongue submitted to a first-line chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (FOLFOX regimen). After chemotherapy the patient obtained the complete disappearance of the primitive neoplasia located in the body of the tongue, and a tumor size reduction > 50% of liver and lung metastases. Conclusions This case demonstrated the activity of the combination of oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil in this very rare neoplasia. The FOLFOX regimen might be considered either in advanced and especially in the neoadjuvant setting, when the reduction of the primary tumor is highly needed.

The treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (rmCRC) and the lack of predictive variables are matters of debate. We conducted a multicentre phase II trial assessing the disease control rate (DCR) of the combination of tegafur/uracil and mitomycin C in rmCRC. The number of previous lines of chemotherapy, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, progression-free survival of the last chemotherapy regimen (PPFS), and the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet/lymphocyte ratio at the time of study entry were evaluated as indicators of early progression. We enrolled 42 patients. The combination was well tolerated with a DCR of 26.2% and median overall survival of 6.9 months. Low CEA levels, PPFS >6 months and low NLR were significantly associated with better prognosis. The study failed its primary endpoint. However, some putative indicators of early progressive patients have been described.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Metformin seems to have anticancer effects. However, it is not clear whether use of glycemia and metformin affect outcomes of patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs). We investigated the association between glycemia and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with pNETs treated with everolimus and/or somatostatin analogues, as well as the association between metformin use and PFS time. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 445 patients with advanced pNET treated at 24 medical centers in Italy from 1999 through 2015. Data on levels of glycemia were collected at time of diagnosis of pNET, before treatment initiation, and during treatment with everolimus (with or without somatostatin analogues), octreotide, or lanreotide. Diabetes was defined as prior or current use of glycemia control medication and/or fasting plasma glucose level ≥ 126 mg/dL, hemoglobin A1c ≥ 6.5% (48 mmol/L), or a random sample of plasma glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L), with reported classic symptoms of hyperglycemia or hyperglycemic crisis. Patients were assigned to groups based on diagnosis of diabetes before or during antitumor therapy. PFS was compared between patients with vs without diabetes. Among patients with diabetes, the association between metformin use and PFS was assessed. We performed sensitivity and landmark analyses to exclude patients who developed diabetes while receiving cancer treatment and to exclude a potential immortal time bias related to metformin intake. RESULTS: PFS was significantly longer in patients with diabetes (median, 32.0 months) than without diabetes (median, 15.1 months) (hazard ratio for patients with vs without diabetes, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.80; P = .0002). PFS of patients treated with metformin was significantly longer (median PFS, 44.2 months) than for patients without diabetes (hazard ratio for survival of patients with diabetes receiving metformin vs without diabetes, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.62; P < .00001) and longer than for patients with diabetes receiving other treatments (median PFS, 20.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.69; P < .0001). In multivariable analysis, adjusted for other factors associated with outcomes, metformin was associated with longer PFS but level of glycemia was not. Metformin was associated with increased PFS of patients receiving somatostatin analogues and in those receiving everolimus, with or without somatostatin analogues. Sensitivity and landmark analyses produced similar results. CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective study of patients with pNETs, we found a significant association between metformin use and longer PFS.

Everolimus is a valid therapeutic option for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs); however, data in a real-world setting outside regulatory trials are sparse. The aim of this study was to determine everolimus tolerability and efficacy, in relation to previous treatments, in a compassionate use program. A total of 169 patients with advanced progressive NETs treated with everolimus were enrolled, including 85 with pancreatic NETs (pNETs) and 84 with nonpancreatic NETs (non-pNETs). Previous treatments included somatostatin analogs (92.9%), peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT; 50.3%), chemotherapy (49.7%), and PRRT and chemotherapy (22.8%). Overall, 85.2% of patients experienced adverse events (AEs), which were severe (grade 3–4) in 46.1%. The most frequent severe AEs were pneumonitis (8.3%), thrombocytopenia (7.7%), anemia (5.3%), and renal failure (3.5%). In patients previously treated with PRRT and chemotherapy, a 12-fold increased risk for severe toxicity was observed, with grade 3–4 AEs reported in 86.8% (vs. 34.3% in other patients). In addition, 63.3% of patients required temporarily everolimus discontinuation due to toxicity. Overall, 27.8% of patients died during a median follow-up of 12 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 12 months and 32 months, respectively. Similar disease control rates, PFS, and OS were reported in pNETs and non-pNETs. In the real-world setting, everolimus is safe and effective for the treatment of NETs of different origins. Higher severe toxicity occurred in patients previously treated with systemic chemotherapy and PRRT. This finding prompts caution when using this drug in pretreated patients and raises the issue of planning for everolimus before PRRT and chemotherapy in the therapeutic algorithm for advanced NETs.

Background The optimal therapeutic strategy for metastatic colorectal cancer patients is still a matter of debate. There are no prognostic variables indicating how many lines individual patients ought to receive, and whether later lines could be effective even when earlier ones were not. Patients and Methods We retrospectively collected data from 420 consecutive patients with metastatic colorectal cancer at our institution, describing the proportion of patients who received second or later lines of therapy and the chance of a line of treatment being active when the previous line was not. For each line of treatment, we defined clinical benefit as the probability of not having had evidence of disease progression 6 months after the start of chemotherapy. Results Of the 373 patients with disease progression after first-line chemotherapy (1L), 277 received a second line (2L) (probability of being submitted to a 2L (P(2L)) = 74.3%): 143 (63.3%) of 226 received a 3L (P(3L)), and 56 (45.9%) of 122 were submitted to a 4L (P(4L)). Joint probabilities were: 2L 74.3%, 3L 47.0%, and 4L 21.6%. A total of 298 (71.5%) of 417 patients had a clinical benefit with 1L; 134 (48.6%) of 276 with 2L; 50 (35.2%) of 142 with 3L; and 12 (25.0%) of 48 with 4L. Taking all these data together, 31% of the patients who experienced early progression at 1L had the chance to have a clinical benefit with any further lines. Conclusion Our study demonstrated that of 4 patients submitted to a 1L, about 3 will receive a 2L, about 2 a 3L, and nearly 1 a 4L. Later lines could be beneficial even though earlier ones were not.

618 Background: This study was undertaken to identify protein expression patterns able to predict response and resistance to chemo-endocrine therapy in elderly BC patients enrolled in a randomised phase II study. Methods: 114 women with T2–4 N0–1, estrogen receptor positive BC were randomly assigned to 6 months of primary Letrozole (L) (2,5 mg/daily) or L plus oral “metronomic” cyclophosphamide (50 mg/daily) (LC). Expression of 24 markers was assessed before treatment on TMAs. Markers were involved in signalling and angiogenic/hypoxia pathways as follow; erbB2, T regulatory cells, caspase3, BNIP3, phosphorylated ERaplha, CCDN1, mTor, Hif-1α, phd1, phd2, phd3, CA9, COX2, p38, p44, EGFr, PI3k, pAkt, CD31, VEGF, Ki67, p53, bcl2, herb2. Principal factor (PF) analysis attempts to identify underlying factors that explain the correlation patterns within a set of observed variables; here, PF analysis was used to reduce the marker expression data by identifying a small number of PFs that explained most of the variance observed. These PFs were introduced in a multivariate logistic regression (MLR) to study basal protein expression profiles with response to chemo-endocrine treatment. Clinical variables such as treatment, age, tumor size, nodal status, grading and histotype were also included in MLR. Results: 91 out of 113 evaluable patients (80.5%) attained a disease response, 48 patients a complete response (CR) (42.5%) whereas 22 did not respond (19.5%). The first 12 extracted PFs from PF analysis explained 80% of the expression data variance; these were considered in a MLR together with clinical variables. The 4th PF, mainly representing Hif-1α and p44 expression, and at lower degree EGFr expression, was the only independent predictor of disease response (OD=0.22, p=0.003). The 6th PF, mainly representing phosphorylated ERalpha expression, was the only independent factor associated with CR (OD=2.036, p=0.023). There was no interaction between these PFs and treatment randomisation. Conclusion: The activated form of ERalpha is with complete response, whereas Hif-1α and p44 were able to discriminate patients resistant to chemo-endocrine treatment. In this latter cohort, specific target therapies can be recommended. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Introduction: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship of expression of hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-1α-modifying enzymes prolyl hydroxylase (PHD)1, PHD2 and PHD3 to response of tumours and survival in breast cancer patients enrolled in a phase II trial of neoadjuvant anthracycline and tamoxifen therapy.Methods: The expression of PHD1, PHD2 and PHD3 together with HIF-1α and the HIF-inducible genes vascular endothelial cell growth factor (VEGF) and carbonic anhydrase IX were assessed by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray approach in 211 patients with T2-4 N0-1 breast cancer enrolled in a randomised trial comparing single-agent epirubicin versus epirubicin and tamoxifen as the primary systemic treatment.Results: PHD1, PHD2 and PHD3 were detected in 47/179 (26.7%), 85/163 (52.2%) and 69/177 (39%) of tumours at baseline. PHD2 and PHD3 expression was moderate/strong whereas PHD1 expression was generally weak. There was a significant positive correlation between HIF-1α and PHD1 (P = 0.002) and PHD3 (P < 0.05) but not PHD2 (P = 0.41). There was a significant positive relationship between VEGF and PHD1 (P < 0.008) and PHD3 (P = 0.001) but not PHD2 (P = 0.09). PHD1, PHD2 and PHD3 expression was significantly increased after epirubicin therapy (all P < 0.000) with no significant difference in PHD changes between the treatment arms. There was no significant difference in response in tumours that expressed PHDs and PHD expression was not associated with survival.Conclusions: Although expression of the PHDs was not related to response or survival in patients receiving neoadjuvant epirubicin, our data provide the first evidence that these enzymes are upregulated on therapy in breast cancer and that the biological effects independent of HIF make them therapeutic targets. © 2011 Fox et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

The increasing knowledge of the genomic landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the development of molecular targeted therapies are a promising background for increasing the number of effective drugs for HCC patients. In recent years, many new drugs have been tested as an alternative to sorafenib or after sorafenib failure.In this review, our aim is to describe the randomized trials recently conducted in HCC patients, in order to understand the main reasons potentially related to the failures of many drugs. In addition, we briefly describe the main ongoing trials, that could potentially change the scenario of HCC treatment in the next years. Expert commentary: Heterogeneity of study populations, lack of understanding of critical drivers of tumor progression, risk of liver toxicity associated with experimental agents, flaws in trial design and marginal antitumoral potency can be considered the main reasons for failure of phase III clinical trials in HCC. Most ongoing trials are conducted without any molecular selection criteria, although many drugs could be probably better tested in a molecularly selected population. The knowledge of potential predictive factors for drug efficacy in patients with advanced HCC could improve the chance of obtaining positive results in clinical trials.

Purpose Knowledge of clinical course of pancreatic endocrine carcinomas (PECs) is poor. This study aimed to determine the time to progression of advanced PECs, and to identify predictors capable of selecting subgroups with higher risk of progression. Patients and Methods In this multicenter retrospective analysis, patients with advanced PECs were enrolled. Staging was according to European Neuroendocrine Tumors Society guidelines. Grading was based on proliferation index using Ki67 immunohistochemistry. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), which was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox regression proportional hazard model was used to identify predictors for tumor progression. Results Two hundred two patients with PECs were enrolled, including 172 with well-differentiated and 30 with poorly differentiated endocrine carcinomas. There were 34 patients with stage III and 168 with stage IV tumors. G1 tumors were present in 19.7% of patients, whereas 60.1% of patients had G2 tumors, and the remaining 20.2% had G3 tumors. Disease progression occurred in 166 patients (82.2%), at a median interval of 10 months (interquartile range, 5 to 22) from diagnosis. Median PFS was 14 months. Different PFS were observed depending on G grade (P < .001) and tumor differentiation (P < .001) and in patients who did not receive any antitumor treatment (P = .002). The major risk factor for progression was the proliferation index Ki67 (hazard ratio, 1.02 for each increasing unit; P < .001). Overall 5-year survival was 44.1%. Conclusion The vast majority of patients with advanced PECs undergo disease progression. The major risk factor for progression is Ki67 index, which should lead physicians dealing with PECs to plan appropriate follow-up programs and therapeutic strategies.

Purpose: We have shown previously that tumor infiltration by FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg) is associated with increased relapse and shorter survival of patients with both in situ and invasive breast cancer. Because estrogen regulates Treg numbers in mice and promotes the proliferation of human Tregs, we hypothesized that blocking estrogen receptor-α signaling would abrogate Tregs and be associated with response to hormonal therapy and increased survival. Experimental Design: FOXP3+ Tregs were quantified in tumor samples collected at baseline by incisional biopsy and after 6 months at definitive surgery in 83 elderly breast cancer patients (T2-4 N0-1) enrolled in a randomized phase II trial based on 6 months of primary letrozole (2.5 mg/d) or 6 months of letrozole plus oral “metronomic” cyclophosphamide (50 mg/d). Results: Treg number ranged from 0 to 380 (median, 30) before treatment and from 0 to 300 (median, 8) after treatment. There was a significant reduction in Tregs in letrozole and letrozole-cyclophosphamide patients (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.002, respectively) after treatment. Treg number at residual histology was inversely related with response (P < 0.03 and P = 0.50, respectively) and a greater Treg reduction was observed in responding patients (P < 0.03). Conclusion: This study suggests that aromatase inhibitors may have an indirect antitumor mechanism of action through reducing Tregs in breast tumors and may be of use in estrogen receptor-α-negative tumors in combination with immunotherapy approaches.

Typing somatostatin receptor expression in neuroendocrine tumors is of relevance to target somatostatin analogue-based diagnostic approach and treatment. The expanding use of immunohistochemistry to detect somatostatin receptors is to date not paralleled by an accurate methodological setting and standardized interpretation of the results. A multicentric study was designed to compare somatostatin receptor immunohistochemical expression with in vivo scintigraphic data and verify its usefulness in the clinical management of neuroendocrine tumors. After methodological setting by testing different somatostatin receptor antibodies, 107 cases of neuroendocrine tumors with available somatostatin receptor scintigraphy data and pathological material were retrospectively analyzed for somatostatin receptor types 2A, 3 and 5 immunohistochemical expression, and compared with scintigraphic images and, whenever available, with the clinical response to somatostatin analogue treatment. Restricting 'positive cases' to the presence of a membrane pattern of staining, an overall somatostatin receptor type 2A immunohistochemistry/somatostatin receptor scintigraphy agreement of 77% (chi2 test P

Background Paraneoplastic neurological syndrome (PNS) is a heterogeneous group of disorders affecting any part of the nervous system, in a patient affected by cancer. PNS is estimated to occur in 0.01 to 8 % of cancer patients, with higher incidence in those with small cell lung cancer, gynecological tumours or hematological disease. Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration (PCD) is the most common PNS, but it has never been reported in patients with pancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours. Case presentation A 61-year-old man presented with an unusual PNS and absence of circulating neural auto-antibodies. Subsequently, contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed a large pancreatic mass, together with multiple liver metastases, histologically diagnosed as a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor. Initial treatment with long-acting somatostatin analogue (octreotide LAR) and prednisone achieved a biochemical response (reduction of chromogranin A level) and a radiological disease control, but patient experienced only a brief improvement of neurological symptoms. Seven months after the onset of the symptoms, he died from neurological impairment. Conclusions PNS can be associated with metastatic non-functioning well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. These tumors may be unresponsive to treatment with somatostatin analogues and an early neurological treatment should be considered for the optimal management of these uncommon cases.

Seasonal variation of baseline diagnosis (or clinical suspect) of stage I-III colorectal cancer patients has been repeatedly reported as an independent variable influencing overall survival. However, data are conflicting and no information is available about such a rhythm in advanced stage patients. To test whether a circannual rhythm of efficacy outcomes can be detected in this setting, we collected data about response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) to first-line chemotherapy of 1610 newly diagnosed metastatic patients treated at four independent centers. Responses to first-line chemotherapy were available for 1495 patients. A strong circannual rhythm in RR was evident, with the higher proportion of responding patients in the subgroup diagnosed in January (acrophase). At the time of data cutoff, 1322 patients progressed and 986 died, with median PFS and OS of 11 and 25.6 months, respectively. A circannual rhythmicity of the proportion of patients progressing at 6 months and surviving at 1 year was demonstrated, with acrophases located both in winter (February and January, respectively), similar to what reported for RR. Several interpretations about the genesis of this cyclic variation could be claimed: the rhythm in sunlight exposure and, as a consequence, of vitamin D serum levels and folate degradation, the variability in toxic effect intensity of chemotherapy, and the rhythm in the biological behavior of tumor cells. This observation is worth of further investigation both in preclinical and in clinical settings in order to better elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) expression in predicting the response to epirubicin and disease-free survival (DFS) in breast cancer patients enrolled in a single institution trial of primary anthracycline and tamoxifen therapy. CAIX expression was assessed in 183 patients with T2–4 N0–1 breast cancer enrolled in a randomized trial comparing four cycles of single agent epirubicin versus epirubicin + tamoxifen as primary systemic treatment. All patients received postoperatively four cycles of the four weekly i.v. cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil regimen. Patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive primary tumors received 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen. Pretreatment, p53 (P = 0.007), c-erbB2 (P < 0.01), and Ki67 (P = 0.02) were directly associated with CAIX expression, while bcl2 (P < 0.000) and ER (P = 0.000) and progesterone receptor (PgR; P < 0.01) were inversely correlated. In multivariate analysis, only high p53 and low bcl2 were independently associated with CAIX positivity. CAIX immunostaining was significantly associated with poor outcome for DFS (P < 0.002) and overall survival (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, a significant interaction was found between CAIX and markers of hormone sensitivity, bcl2 (P = 0.01), ER (P = 0.02), PgR (P = 0.02), and lymph node involvement (P = 0.04), in predicting DFS. Presently, there are few clinical markers of resistance to tamoxifen treatment in ER-positive tumors. CAIX expression in breast cancer patients shows a negative predictive role of treatment efficacy in ER-positive patients on the adjuvant tamoxifen after primary chemo-endocrine therapy. Studies investigating the effects of pH on tamoxifen uptake and the effects of therapy with CA inhibitors are planned.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the influence of baseline haemoglobin level in predicting response to 5-fluorouracil (5FU)-based first-line chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer patients. Data from 631 patients were collected from three different institutions. Globally, overall response rate was 35.8% (226 out of 631). Factors influencing response rate were 5FU dose intensity (high: 43.1%, low: 34.0%, P = 0.03); oxaliplatin (yes: 45.8%, no: 22.9%, P0.0001), performance status (PS 0: 46.1%, 1: 28.8%, 2: 26.7%, P0.0001), and haemoglobin levels (or = 12 g dl(-1): 40.4%,12 g dl(-1): 29.2%, P = 0.004). In subgroup analysis significant differences in response rate between anaemic and nonanaemic patients were recorded in those patients treated with infusional chemotherapies (45.7 vs 25.5%, P0.0001), with high 5FU dose intensity (50.3 vs 32.7%, P = 0.005), with PS = 0 (49.8 vs 37.9%, P = 0.03), and with liver metastases (44.8 vs 33.8%, P = 0.002), whereas no difference was evident in those subjects treated with bolus schedules or according to gender. Anaemia was a strong predictor for activity of first-line 5FU-based chemotherapy especially in those groups that showed the best responses, for example high performance status, infusionally treated, higher 5FU dose and those with liver secondaries. Patients with higher haemoglobin levels recorded a greater response rate and a longer time to progression and survival than anaemic subjects. Prospective evaluation of role of correcting anaemia on response to therapy is justified by these results.

Summary Purpose. To investigate whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to clinical palpation in the assessment of response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy (PC). Patients and methods. Seventy-three patients with T2–4, N0, M0 breast cancer were treated with 3–4 cycles of single agent epirubicin before definitive surgery. MRI was performed at baseline condition and at the end of chemotherapy. Results. According to the WHO criteria, 20 (27.4%) patients attained a complete response (CR) by clinical palpation and 41 (56.2%) a partial response. The corresponding response rate by MRI was 11 (15.1%) and 34 (46.6%), respectively. Residual tumor assessed by MRI better correlated with pathologic measurements (Spearman r: 0.72) than residual tumor assessed by clinical palpation (Spearman r: 0.58). Post-chemotherapy histology evaluation revealed pathologic CR in three cases, only one of them was considered as complete responder by MRI. Residual disease consisted in in situ carcinoma in four cases, one of them was complete responder at MRI, the remaining three showed residual abnormal contrast enhancement indistinguishable from that of invasive tumors. Conclusions. As compared to pathology specimens, MRI is able to represent the extent of cancer more accurately than clinical palpation. It constitutes a promising technique in assessing the BC response to PC. The current limit of MRI is the scarce specificity in predicting the nature of residual disease.

Introduction: Several studies have correlated the diabetic status with increased cancer risk and worse cancer prognosis, while metformin (MET) use is associated with a better prognosis. MET could display antitumor effects by modifying systemic metabolism, e.g. by decreasing of blood glucose, insulin and IGF1 levels, or by affecting cancer cell metabolism and proliferation, e.g. through AMPK activation and inhibition of protein/lipid synthesis. Preliminary findings of the PRIME-net retrospective study, conducted on 445 Italian pts, suggested that the addition of MET to EVE and/or SSAs provides clinical benefit in diabetic patient with advanced pancreatic NETs. Methods: To exclude the possibility that the “time-on-treatment bias” could affect our results, with the risk that an early interruption of EVE or SSA-therapy due to early disease progression may result in lower pt exposure to these drugs and a consequently lower incidence of diabetes in poor responders, a sensitivity analysis on the PRIME-net study population was performed. The analysis considered only diabetics at baseline (BD), thus excluding pts who developed on-treatment diabetes as an adverse event (AE). All statistical tests were two-tailed and p-values Results: Out of 445 pts, 237 were diabetics. Of them, 179 had baseline diabetes (BD) while 57 developed on-treatment diabetes as an adverse event. Among pts with BD, 80 (44.7%) received MET, while 99 (55.3%) were not treated with MET, but received other treatments including insulin. mPFS was 24.7 mo in pts with BD and 15.1 mo in normoglycemic ones (HR 0.70, 95%CI 0.55-0.91; p=0.007). In pts on MET therapy, mPFS was 43.7 mo (HR vs normoglycemic pts 0.52, 95%CI 0.36-0.76, p=0.0006), while it was 20.8 mo in pts not receiving MET (HR vs normoglycemic pts 0.87, 95%CI 0.65-1.17, p=0.37). Conclusions: This sensitivity analysis confirms results emerged from the main analysis, thus demonstrating a mPFS advantage in diabetic patients with advanced pNETs patients receiving MET in combination with EVE and/or SSAs. Prospective investigations are ongoing to test the antitumor activity of MET in combination with everolimus and SSAs in normoglycaemic pts with advanced pNETs. Protocol number INT 85/15, approved by Ethical committee of fondazione IRCCS Istituto Tumori Milano on 15 June 2015. Citation Format: Sara Pusceddu, Claudio Vernieri, Massimo Di Maio, Femia Daniela, Natalie Prinzi, Riccardo Marconcini, Francesca Spada, Sara Massironi, Alberto Bongiovanni, Maria Pia Brizzi, Davide Campana, Antongiulio Faggiano, Dario Giuffrida, Gianfranco Delle Fave, Sara Cingarlini, Francesca Aroldi, Lorenzo Antonuzzo, Rossana Berardi, Laura Catena, Roberto Buzzoni, Filippo de Braud. Impact of metformin on progression-free survival in diabetic patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) receiving everolimus and/or somatostatin analogues: A sensitivity analysis of the PRIME-NET (pancreatic multicentric, retrospective, italian metformin) study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-256. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-LB-256

Aim: The Italian Retrospective Analysis of Sorafenib as First or Second Target Therapy study assessed the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated in the community. Patients & methods: Patients receiving first- or second-line single-agent sorafenib between January 2008 and December 2010 were eligible. Retrospective data collection started in 2012 and covers at least 1-year follow-up. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results: Median OS was 17.2 months (95% CI: 15.5–19.6): 19.9 months (95% CI: 15.9–25.3) in patients treated with first-line sorafenib and 16.3 months (95% CI: 13.1–18.2) with second-line sorafenib. Overall median (95% CI) progression-free survival was 5.9 months (95% CI: 4.9–6.7): 6.6 (95% CI: 4.9–9.3) and 5.3 months (95% CI: 4.3–6.0) in first- and second-line patients, respectively. Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of sorafenib in routine community practice was generally good, especially in relation to OS in patients treated in the second line, where results were similar to those seen in recent prospective clinical trials.

Case Thrombocytopenic thrombotic purpura (TTP), a life-threatening event consisting of disseminated vascular thrombosis, has never been described before as a possible side effect of the anticancer drug pemetrexed. A 70 years old patient affected by a poorly differentiated non small cell lung cancer, subjected to his first pemetrexed administration, developed an acute thrombocytopenic thrombotic purpura, fatal in a few hours. Conclusions Pemetrexed can cause TTP. Clinicians have to be alert for the rapid onset and aggressiveness of this possible side effect. It is difficult to recognise the first signs and symptoms.