Search

Background/Aims: Conducive to improve the participatory process, it is necessary to identify the factors that modulate the perception of risks and benefits of any therapy; in this context, this paper aims to achieve a better understanding of patients' perspectives on cancer treatment to help identify possible discrepancies, resulting in optimizing and customizing various therapeutic strategies and increasing their compliance with treatment. Materials and Methods: The present study was performed on a group consisting of 83 patients hospitalized between April 15 and May 15, 2018 in the Oncology Department of the Municipal Hospital "Philanthropy" in Craiova. In order to assess their perception of the risks / benefits of cancer treatment, a questionnaire based on CTSQ was developed. Results: 39.76% of patients are convinced that oncological treatment will certainly cure them; 43.37% mistakenly believe that cancer therapy can surely prevent cancer spreading; 44.58% of patients consider that therapy limits their activity; 78.31% of the surveyed patients consider that they have always been informed about the potential benefits of the treatment, while 77.11% regarding risks; only 27.71% would definitely opt for the same therapy. Conclusion: This study showed a lower-than-expected level of understanding of cancer treatment. The results obtained in this study should be interpreted with caution, as it is necessary to study a much larger batch to validate them.

Glioblastomas (GBMs) are the most lethal and hard to treat malignancies in clinical practice. The standard of care for treating GBM involving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy and concomitant temozolomide (TMZ) has remained virtually unchanged in the past decade. Molecular targeted therapies against cancer-specific structures have reported mediocre results in the treatment of GBM, due to multiple factors such as the presence of the blood brain barrier or a vast array of molecular alterations which greatly hinder the action of the most therapeutic agents. One such therapy is directed against the epidermal growth factor (EGF) and its' receptor (EGFR) using either monoclonal antibodies or tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Even though anti-EGF/EGFR treatment produced encouraging results in other forms of cancer it failed to present any clinical benefit for patients with GBM. Lately, immunotherapies that focus on using the host's own immune system against cancer cells have gained popularity, with approaches like peptide vaccination being successfully used in clinical trials for different types of malignancies. These immune-based therapies could hold the key to improving both the prognosis and quality of life for patients suffering for cancers previously considered incurable, such as GBM.

Cancer remains one of the most difficult to manage healthcare problems. The last two decades have been considered the golden age of cancer research, with major breakthroughs being announced on a regular basis. However, the major problem regarding cancer treatment is the incapability to selectively target cancer cells, with certain populations of tumors still remaining alive after treatment. The main focus of researchers is to develop treatments that are both effective and selective in targeting malignant cells. In this regard, bioavailability can be increased by overcoming the biological barriers encountered in the active agent’s pathway, creating carrier vehicles that have the ability to target malignant cells and effectively release the active agent. Since its appearance, nanomedicine has provided many answers to these challenges, but still, some expectations were not satisfied. In this review, we focused on the most recent developments in targeted drug delivery. Furthermore, a summary of different types of nanoparticles used to deliver active therapeutic agents in oncology is presented, along with details on the nanodrugs that were clinically approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), until April 2019.

The failure of therapies targeting tumor angiogenesis may be caused by anti-angiogenic resistance mechanisms induced by VEGF and non-VEGF pathways alterations. Anti-angiogenic therapy failure is also attributed to immune system, acting by tumor-associated macrophages that release pro-angiogenic factors and a consequent increase of blood vessels. Recently, in a study by Rheal et al., a new angiogenic receptor, epidermal growth factor, latrophilin, and 7 trans-membrane domain-containing protein 1 on chromosome 1(ELTD1) has been identified as a promising glioma biomarker. In this study we aim to analyse whether this receptor may be used as a target molecule in glioblastoma therapy. Our results showed that small interfering RNA silencing ELTD1 caused cytotoxicity in glioblastoma cells. We also found that PDGFR, VEGFR, and their common PI3K/mTOR intracellular pathway inactivation-induced cytotoxicity in glioblastoma cells. Further, we found high percent of cytotoxicity in a low passage glioblastoma cell line after BEZ235 (a dual inhibitor of PI3K/mTOR pathway) treatment at nanomolar concentrations, compared to AG1433 (a PDGFR inhibitor) and SU1498 (a VEGFR inhibitor) that were only cytotoxic at micromolar ranges. In the future, these could prove as attractive therapeutic targets in single therapy or coupled with classic therapeutic approaches such as chemotherapy of radiotherapy.