Search

Objective The chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH)-Drain trial compared recurrence rates and clinical outcome associated with the use of subperiosteal drain (SPD) and subdural drain (SDD) after burr-hole drainage for cSDH. This subgroup analysis aimed to determine whether one drain type is preferable for patients treated with platelet inhibitors (PI) or anticoagulants (AC). Methods This subanalysis included 133 patients treated with PI/AC of the 220 patients from the preceding cSDH-Drain trial. For these patients the association between the drain type used and recurrence rates, mortality, as well as clinical outcome at 6 weeks and 12 months follow-up were analyzed using a logistic regression analysis model. Additionally, recurrence rates, clinical outcome, and mortality were assessed for each PI or AC type separately. Results The insertion of SPD was associated with 7.35% recurrence rates compared to 13.85% with SDD in patients treated with PI or AC (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.06–2.65, P = 0.36). Outcome measurements and mortality did not differ significantly between both groups at 6-week and 12-month follow-up. In addition, there was no statistically significant association between drain type and recurrence rate or mortality when comparing data for each PI or AC type. At 24 hours postoperatively, significantly more patients under phenprocoumon and natrium-dalteparin had a Glasgow Coma Scale score between 13 and 15 in the SDD group compared with the SPD group (P = 0.006), whereaas at 6-week follow-up significantly more patients in the SDD group treated with ASA had a good modified Rankin scale score (P = 0.01). At 12 months, no significant difference in outcome measurements was seen for all PI and AC types. Conclusions In patients treated with PI or AC, the insertion of SPD after burr-hole drainage of cSDH showed comparable recurrence, mortality, and long term outcome rates when compared with SDD.

Background The insertion of a subdural drain (SDD) after burr-hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) was shown to reduce recurrence rate and improve outcome at 6 months. However, studies analyzing the rate of drain misplacement and complications associated with drain misplacement are sparse. Methods We analyzed retrospectively a cohort of consecutive patients undergoing burr-hole drainage for cSDH in 2 institutes. Drain type (subperiosteal drain vs. SDD), drain misplacement rate, and drain-associated complications were analyzed. We explored potential risk factors for drain misplacement and associated complications in the SDD subgroup using univariate and multivariate analysis. Drain misplacement was defined as incorrect drain position exceeding the subdural cavity and was categorized into drain misplacement without radiologic sequelae, drain misplacement causing radiologically confirmed iatrogenic bleeding, and drain misplacement causing neurologic symptoms. Results Of 463 included patients, 290 (62.6%) received an SDD. Drain misplacement occurred in 73 patients (15.8%). In 5 (6.9%) and 9 (12.3%) of these patients, iatrogenic bleeding and neurologic symptoms occurred, respectively. Intake of vitamin K antagonists (odds ratio [OR], 3.64) or different oral anticoagulants (OR, 10.24), and low preoperative Glasgow Coma Scale score (OR, 7.81) remained associated risk factors for drain misplacement after multivariate analysis. Patients with misplaced drains showed a strong association with postoperative bleeding (OR, 5.81), longer operation time (OR, 1.01), and hospitalization time (OR, 1.08) after multivariate analysis. Conclusions The occurrence of SDD misplacement is unignorable, because it leads to iatrogenic drain-associated complications and seems to affect bleeding events and hospitalization time of patients undergoing burr-hole drainage of cSDH.

Despite increasing use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), guidelines for their perioperative use in spine surgery are still lacking. The main goal of our study was to analyze the occurrence of postoperative bleeding events and possible confounders in patients treated with DOACs who undergo spine surgery.Of 2777 patients undergoing spine surgery at our institution, 82 (2.9%) were treated with DOACs. The primary endpoint was postoperative bleeding events. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative thromboembolic events and anemia, hematologic findings, perioperative packed red blood cell substitution, operative time, hospital length of stay, morbidity, and mortality. Subanalysis of possible confounders affecting the rates of bleeding was also performed. Additionally, correlation of bleeding event rates and preoperative and postoperative discontinuation of DOACs was analyzed.Overall postoperative bleeding events rate was 4.9% (n = 4). Preoperative DOAC discontinuation time of24 hours increased significantly the rate of perioperative packed red blood cell substitution (P = 0.007). Treatment with concomitant blood thinners showed a trend toward higher incidence of bleeding events (P = 0.066), whereas pre-existing kidney failure increased significantly rates of postoperative anemia (P = 0.014). The rate of postoperative thromboembolic events was 4.9% (n = 4); all events occurred with DOAC resumption72 hours postoperatively.Short preoperative discontinuation time of DOACs, even24 hours, may be justified, considering an increased risk of perioperative packed red blood cell substitution. Care should be taken with patients treated with concomitant blood thinners and patients with pre-existing kidney disease. Postoperative DOAC resumption72 hours may increase risk of thromboembolic events.

Background There is a significant variance in surgical treatment strategies of ventral cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks causing spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH). Posterior approaches might represent a preferable alternative to the more invasive anterior and lateral routes, as long as the spinal cord is not exposed to harmful manipulation. The aim of this technical note is to report and illustrate a new surgical technique using an intradural extraarachnoid sutureless technique via laminoplasty for indirect repair of ventral CSF leaks causing intractable SIH symptoms. Methods The surgical technique is described in a step by step fashion. Between May 2018 and May 2020, five patients with ventral spinal CSF leaks were operated on, utilizing this technique. All dural defects were located at the level of the thoracic spine. A retrospective review on demographic and radiological findings, symptoms, outcome, and follow-up was performed. Results The intra- and postoperative course was uneventful in all patients with no surgery-related complications. Three patients recovered completely at discharge, while neurological symptoms significantly improved in two patients. A postoperative MRI of the spine was obtained for all patients, demonstrating regressive signs of CSF leak. Conclusion Based on the presented case series, this intradural extraarachnoid sutureless technique combined with laminoplasty seems to be a safe and effective option for indirect repair of ventral dural defects in SIH. In our opinion, it represents a valid alternative to traditional more aggressive approaches.

Objective Ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement is one of the most frequent neurosurgical procedures. The position of the proximal catheter is important for shunt survival. Shunt placement is done either without image guidance (“freehand”) according to anatomical landmarks or by use of various image-guided techniques. Studies evaluating ultrasound-guided (US-G) VPS placement are sparse. We evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of US-G VPS placement, and compare it to freehand VPS placement. Methods We prospectively collected data of consecutive patients undergoing US-G VPS placement. Thereafter, the US cohort was compared with a cohort of patients in whom VPS was inserted using the freehand technique (freehand cohort). Primary outcome was accuracy of catheter positioning, and secondary outcomes were postoperative improvement in Evans' index (EI), rates of shunt dysfunction and revision surgery, perioperative complications, as well as operation, and anesthesia times. Results We included 15 patients undergoing US-G VPS insertion. Rates of optimally placed shunts were higher in the US cohort (67 vs. 49%, p = 0.28), whereas there were no malpositioned VPS (0%) in the US cohort, compared with 10 (5.8%) in the freehand cohort (p = 0.422). None of the factors in the univariate analysis showed significant association with nonoptimal (NOC) VPS placement in the US cohort. The mean EI improvement was significantly better in the US cohort than in the freehand cohort (0.043 vs. 0.014, p = 0.035). Conclusion Based on our preliminary results, US-G VPS placement seems to be feasible, safe, and increases the rate of optimally placed catheters.

Chronic subdural hematoma is a commonly encountered disease in neurosurgic practice, whereas its increasing prevalence is compatible with the ageing population. Recommendations concerning postoperative thrombosis prophylaxis after burr-hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma are lacking. The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma and postoperative application of thrombosis prophylaxis.Retrospective, consecutive sample of patients undergoing burr-hole drainage for chronic subdural hematoma over 3 years.Single, academic medical center.All patients undergoing surgical evacuation of a chronic subdural hematoma with burr-hole drainage. Exclusion: patients under the age of 18 years, who presented with an acute subdural hematoma and those who underwent a craniotomy.We compared patients receiving thrombosis prophylaxis treatment after burr-hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma with those who were not treated. Primary outcome measure was reoperation of chronic subdural hematoma due to recurrence. Secondary outcome measures were thromboembolic and cardiovascular events, hematologic findings, morbidity, and mortality. In addition, a subanalysis comparing recurrence rate dependent on the application time of thrombosis prophylaxis (48 vs48 hr) was undertaken.Overall recurrence rate of chronic subdural hematoma was 12.7%. Out of the 234 analyzed patients, 135 (57.3%) received postoperative thrombosis prophylaxis (low-molecular-weight heparin) applied subcutaneously. Recurrence of chronic subdural hematoma occurred in the thrombosis prophylaxis group and control group in 12 patients (8.9%) and 17 patients (17.2%), respectively, showing no significant difference (odds ratio, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.21 - 1.04]). A subanalysis comparing recurrence rate of chronic subdural hematoma dependent on the application time of thrombosis prophylaxis (48 vs48 hr) showed no significant difference either (odds ratio, 2.80 [95% CI, 0.83-9.36]). Higher dosage of thrombosis prophylaxis correlated with recurrence rates of chronic subdural hematoma, both in univariate and multivariate analyses.Our data suggest that the application of postoperative thrombosis prophylaxis after burr-hole drainage for chronic subdural hematoma does not result in higher recurrence rates of chronic subdural hematoma. In addition, it seems that early administration of thrombosis prophylaxis (48 hr) has no influence on recurrence rates; however, high dosage seems to increase recurrence rates.

Background The number of patients treated with novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is increasing. Despite growing clinical relevance, guidelines on the perioperative management of neurosurgical patients treated with NOACs are still lacking. The aim of this study was to analyze the occurrence of postoperative bleeding events and factors that might influence bleeding rates in these patients. Methods Out of 1353 consecutive patients undergoing cranial neurosurgical procedures, 30 (2.2%) received NOACs preoperatively. The rates of perioperative and postoperative intracranial bleeding events, rate of postoperative thromboembolic events, hematologic findings, morbidity, and mortality were reviewed. A subanalysis of factors influencing the bleeding risk of these patients and the bleeding rate depending on the preoperative discontinuation time of NOACS, with cutoff of 24 and 48 hours, was performed as well. Results The rate of perioperative bleeding was 13.3% (n = 4 of 30). Postoperative bleeding led to death in 2 patients. The median discontinuation time was significantly shorter in the patients experiencing a bleeding event compared to those without a bleeding event (1.5 days [range 0–3 days] vs. 11 days [range, 0–120 days]). The rate of perioperative thromboembolic events was 3.3% (n = 1), and overall mortality was 13.3% (n = 4). Conclusions The postoperative bleeding rate in patients undergoing cranial surgery treated with NOACs was 13.3%. A shorter preoperative discontinuation time seems to have a significant effect on bleeding rate. Further studies evaluating the management and postsurgical outcomes of these patients are warranted.

Objective: Meningiomas represent the most common intracranial extraaxial neoplasia in adults, accounting for a third of all diagnosed primary tumors of the brain. Despite decades of research, relatively little data on demographics of meningiomas exist. The aim of our study was to undertake an analysis of demographics and outcome of patients who underwent meningioma surgery over an 8-year time period at our institution. Methods: We reviewed 187 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed meningioma. Demographic data, tumor location and side, surgical resection grade, and histopathological and radiological data were collected and assessed for all patients. Furthermore, recurrence, morbidity, and mortality were evaluated. Results: Of the 187 consecutive patients undergoing meningioma resection over a period of 8 years, 131 (70.1%) were women ( p < 0.001). Meningiomas were classified as World Health Organization (WHO) grade I, grade II, and grade III in 66.8%, 31.0%, and 2.1%, of the cases, respectively ( p < 0.001). MIB-1 proliferation index was 10 in 11.8% of the lesions ( p < 0.001). In 82.4% of the cases, gross total resection was achieved. Recurrence occurred in 23 patients (12.3%), while overall morbidity and mortality rate was 41.2% and 7.7%, respectively. Conclusion: Based on our results, women are more than twice as likely to be affected, and the peak age is between 60 years and 70 years. Recurrence rate in our cohort was relatively low when compared to the data in the literature. The diagnosis of WHO grade II meningiomas, 31% in our cohort, is increasing since the 2007 WHO criteria have been published.

Objective The randomized controlled Chronic Subdural Hematoma (cSDH)-Drain-Trial showed comparable recurrence rates after placing a subperiosteal drain (SPD) or a subdural drain (SDD) for surgically drained cSDH, although SDD was associated with higher rates of infection and iatrogenic brain injury. This subanalysis examines the time to recurrence and possible risk factors for recurrence after burr-hole drainage of cSDH and placement of a SPD compared with a SDD. Methods We included 220 patients from the preceding cSDH-Drain-Trial. Time to recurrence was compared within the 2 groups using a univariate Cox proportional hazards model. Apart from intraoperative brain expansion (iBE), defined by residual hematoma-cavity on computer tomography 24 hours after surgery, other possible pre-, intra- and postoperative risk factors for recurrence were assessed through univariate and multivariate analysis. Results Median time to recurrence was 22.5 days (interquartile range: 9.25–52 days, range: 0–81) showing no difference between the 2 groups. Less iBE (P = 0.019), lower Glasgow Outcome Scale score at discharge (P = 0.007), and lower Glasgow Coma Scale score at 24 hours (P = 0.037) were strongly associated with recurrence on univariate analysis. After multivariate logistic analysis, less iBE (odds ratio: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01; 1.21; P = 0.03) remained the only significant risk factor associated with recurrence. When comparing the risk factors within the 2 groups, less iBE and lower Glasgow Outcome Scale score at release were associated with recurrence only in the SDD group. Conclusions The inserted drain type after burr-hole drainage of cSDH does not seem to influence time to recurrence. SPD may be warranted in routine clinical practice, independent of individual patient, surgical, or hematoma characteristics.

Guidelines on the administration of prophylactic antiepileptic drugs (AED), and specifically levetiracetam, for brain tumor surgery are still lacking. In this two-center matched cohort study, we aim to compare the proportion of postoperative seizures during follow-up after supratentorial tumor surgery in patients receiving no seizure prophylaxis, and those treated with levetiracetam perioperatively. Three hundred sixteen consecutive patients undergoing supratentorial tumor surgery, without history of seizures were included: 207 patients did not receive AED (no AED group), and 109 patients received levetiracetam perioperatively (levetiracetam group). The primary outcome measure was the rate of postoperative seizures. Additionally, uni- and multivariate analyses assessing possible risk factors for postoperative seizures were performed. No statistically significant difference for the occurrence of postoperative seizures was found between the two groups (10.1%, n = 21 in the no AED group vs. 9.2%, n = 10, in the levetiracetam group; p = 0.69, OR 0.9 [0.4–2.0), NNT 103 [12.9–17.1]). After propensity score matching, the primary outcome was observed in 13 patients (12.4%) from the no AED group and in 9 patients (8.6%) from the levetiracetam group (p = 0.50, OR 0.7 [0.3–1.6], NNT 26.3 [8.3–22.4]). Among all analyzed possible risk factors for postoperative seizures, only postoperative infarction showed a statistically significant association with higher seizure rates in multivariate analysis (OR 8.2 [1.1–60.6], p = 0.04). Prophylactic treatment with levetiracetam after brain tumor surgery showed no statistically significant effect in preventing postoperative seizures. However, in case a postoperative infarction occurs, its administration might be indicated.

Background Antiplatelet therapy in patients with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) presents significant neurosurgical challenges. Given the lack of guidelines regarding perioperative management with antiplatelet therapy, it is difficult to balance the patient's increased cardiovascular risk and prevalence of cSDH. Objective To better understand the risk and recurrence rates related to resuming low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) by evaluating our patients' resumption of low-dose ASA at various times after burr-hole drainage of the hematoma. Methods In our retrospective study, 140 consecutive patients taking low-dose ASA undergoing surgical evacuation of cSDH were included. Data included baseline characteristics and rates of recurrence, morbidity, and mortality. A multivariate logistic regression model analyzed the association between ASA resumption time and recurrence rates. Results No statistically significant association was observed between early postoperative resumption of low-dose ASA and recurrence of cSDH (odds ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.001-1.022; P = .06). Corresponding odds ratios and risk differences for restarting ASA treatment on postoperative days 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, or 42 were estimated at 1.53 and 5.9%, 1.42 and 5.1%, 1.33 and 4.1%, 1.23 and 3.2%, 1.15 and 2.2%, 1.07 and 1.1%, and 1.01 and 0.2%, respectively (P > .05). Cardiovascular event rates, surgical morbidity, and mortality did not significantly differ between patients with or without ASA therapy. Conclusion Given the few published studies regarding ASA use in cranial neurosurgery, our findings elucidate one issue, showing comparable recurrence rates with early or late resumption of low-dose ASA after burr-hole evacuation of cSDH. Abbreviations ASA, acetylsalicylic acidCAD, coronary artery diseaseCI, confidence intervalcSDH, chronic subdural hematomaGCS, Glasgow Coma ScalemRS, modified Rankin ScaleOR, odds ratioRD, risk difference.

To determine whether complications in lumbar fusion surgery could be estimated from patient factors and perioperative laboratory values. In addition, risk scores for detection of patients prone to complications were defined.We retrospectively collected data of patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery between 2013 and 2015. The patients were divided into group A (no complications) and group B (systemic and infectious complications within 30 days postoperatively). Patient-related factors and levels of perioperative laboratory values were compared between the groups and analyzed for possible impact on complications and length of stay (LOS) in the hospital.Data of 132 consecutive patients (74 women [56.1%]; median age, 68.5 years) were analyzed. Postoperative complications occurred in 29.5%. Higher postoperative creatine kinase (CK) and C-reactive protein and lower postoperative hemoglobin and thrombocyte values, as well as higher differences between preoperative and postoperative CK, C-reactive protein, and hemoglobin values were associated with postoperative complications. Among others, the combinations of advanced age and elevated body mass index (P = 0.0062, odds ratio: 3.018), or advanced age, elevated body mass index, and postoperative CK166 U/L (P = 0.0016, odds ratio: 3.637) revealed patients with a threefold risk for complications. The combination of advanced age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score2, and preoperative hemoglobin12.9 g/dL was associated with a LOS of 20.3 versus 11 days (P = 0.01).Patients with postoperative complications and extended LOS seem to show significant differences in various perioperative laboratory values and patient factors. Perioperative risk assessments using cut-off values and risk scores may help identify patients prone to complications and extended resource use.

Background The use of a subdural drain (SDD) after burr-hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) reduces recurrence at 6 mo. Subperiosteal drains (SPDs) are considered safer, since they are not positioned in direct contact to cortical structures, bridging veins, or hematoma membranes. Objective To investigate whether the recurrence rate after insertion of a SPD is noninferior to the insertion of a more commonly used SDD. Methods Multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial analyzing patients undergoing burr-hole drainage for cSDH aged 18 yr and older. After hematoma evacuation, patients were randomly assigned to receive either a SDD (SDD-group) or a SPD (SPD-group). The primary endpoint was recurrence indicating a reoperation within 12 mo, with a noninferiority margin of 3.5%. Secondary outcomes included clinical and radiological outcome, morbidity and mortality rates, and length of stay. Results Of 220 randomized patients, all were included in the final analysis (120 SPD and 100 SDD). Recurrence rate was lower in the SPD group (8.33%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.28-14.72) than in the SDD group (12.00%, 95% CI 6.66-19.73), with the treatment difference (3.67%, 95% CI -12.6-5.3) not meeting predefined noninferiority criteria. The SPD group showed significantly lower rates of surgical infections (P = .0406) and iatrogenic morbidity through drain placement (P = .0184). Length of stay and mortality rates were comparable in both groups. Conclusion Although the noninferiority criteria were not met, SPD insertion led to lower recurrence rates, fewer surgical infections, and lower drain misplacement rates. These findings suggest that SPD may be warranted in routine clinical practice.

Background The aim of this international survey was to investigate the current management of patients undergoing surgery for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) treated with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Methods We administered a survey via e-mail to neurosurgeons with questions relating to the surgical treatment of cSDH, emphasizing their practices with patients treated with low-dose ASA. Results We received 157 responses, with a response rate of 22.4%. Almost 80% of the responders discontinue ASA treatment at least 5 days before surgery and 80.7% resume treatment after 5 days or more, and 27.6% discontinue treatment for at least 30 days. The main factor influencing ASA resumption time is the indication for ASA (54.5%), and postoperative imaging is concluded in 71.7%, Postoperative thrombosis prophylaxis is administered by 60% of the responders, and 50% apply it 24 hours after surgery. Almost 95% of the responders believe that better evidence is needed for the management of patients with cSDH treated with ASA. Guidelines for these patients exist in only 24.3% of the institutes. Conclusions Most neurosurgeons discontinue ASA treatment for at least 7 days in the perioperative period of surgical evacuation of cSDH, even though recent studies show that early ASA resumption might be safe. Thrombosis prophylaxis is administered by only 60%, even though patients with cSDH are at high risk of developing thromboembolic complications. Better evidence and guidelines are warranted because the incidence of patients with cSDH under the treatment of ASA is increasing.

Objective To investigate whether, after the publication of grade I evidence that it reduces recurrence rates, the practice of drain insertion after burr-hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma has changed. Further, we aimed to document various practice modalities concerning the insertion of a drain adopted by neurosurgeons internationally. Methods We administered a survey to neurosurgeons worldwide with questions relating to the surgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma, with an emphasis on their practices concerning the use of a drain. Results The preferred surgical technique was burr-hole drainage (89%). Most surgeons prefer to place a drain (80%), whereas in 56% of the cases the reason for not placing a drain was brain expansion after evacuation. Subdural drains are placed by 50% and subperiosteal drains by 27% of the responders, whereas 23% place primarily a subdural drain if possible and otherwise a subperiosteal drain. Three quarters of the responders leave the drain for 48 hours and give prophylactic antibiotic treatment, mostly a single-shot dose intraoperatively (70%). Routine postoperative computed tomography is done by 59% mostly within 24–48 hours after surgery (94%). Adjunct treatment to surgery rarely is used (4%). Conclusions The publication of grade I evidence in favor of drain use influenced positively this practice worldwide. Some surgeons are still reluctant to insert a drain, especially when the subdural space is narrow after drainage of the hematoma. The insertion of a subperiosteal drain could be a good alternative solution. However, its outcome and efficacy must be evaluated in larger studies.

OBJECTIVE Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement is a common procedure for the treatment of hydrocephalus following diverse neurosurgical conditions. Most of the patients present with other comorbidities and receive antiplatelet therapy, usually acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Despite its clinical relevance, the perioperative management of these patients has not been sufficiently investigated. The aim of this study was to compare the peri- and postoperative bleeding complication rates associated with ASA intake in patients undergoing VP shunt placement. METHODS Of 172 consecutive patients undergoing VP shunt placement between June 2009 and December 2015, 40 (23.3%) patients were receiving low-dose ASA treatment. The primary outcome measure was bleeding events in ASA users versus nonusers, whereas secondary outcome measures were postoperative cardiovascular events, hematological findings, morbidity, and mortality. A subgroup analysis was conducted in patients who discontinued ASA treatment for < 7 days (n = 4, ASA Group 1) and for ≥ 7 days (n = 36, ASA Group 2). RESULTS No statistically significant difference for bleeding events was observed between ASA users and nonusers (p = 0.30). Cardiovascular complications, surgical morbidity, and mortality did not differ significantly between the groups either. Moreover, there was no association between ASA discontinuation regimens (< 7 days and ≥ 7 days) and hemorrhagic events. CONCLUSIONS Given the lack of guidelines regarding perioperative management of neurosurgical patients with antiplatelet therapy, these findings elucidate one issue, showing comparable bleeding rates in ASA users and nonusers undergoing VP shunt placement.

Temporal gait variability is a critical parameter in patients with balance problems. Increased magnitude of temporal gait variability corresponds to a higher risk of falls. The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of walking speed on temporal stride-to-stride variability in patients with cerebellar and vestibular deficits. A GAITRite system was used to analyze the gait of 40 patients with cerebellar ataxia, 22 patients with bilateral vestibular failure, and 51 healthy subjects over the entire range of the individual's speed capacity. The coefficient of variability of stride time was calculated for each walk. Temporal gait variability was increased in cerebellar patients and vestibular patients. The magnitude of this variability depended on walking speed in a disease-specific manner. In patients with cerebellar ataxia, variability was increased during slow (8.4 ± 5.3%, P < .01) and fast (7.9 ± 6.4%, P < .01) walking speed but was normal during preferred walking speed. This resulted in a speed-related U-shaped function of stride-time variability. Patients with vestibular failure had increased variability during slow walking (9.9 ± 4.3%, P < .01). During walking with medium and fast walking speed, stride time variability was normal. Minimal temporal gait variability appears to be attractive for the locomotor system in cerebellar patients because these patients preferred to walk at a velocity associated with minimal stride-time variability. In contrast to previous studies, vestibular patients accelerate rather than decelerate gait to achieve dynamic stability. This may be explained by reduced sensory integration during fast locomotion. © 2011 Movement Disorder Society

Despite being widely used, ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement is a procedure often associated with complications and revision surgeries. Many neurosurgical centers routinely perform early postoperative cranial computer tomography (CT) to detect postoperative complications (e.g., catheter malposition, postoperative bleed, over-drainage). Because guidelines are lacking, our study aimed to evaluate the yield of early routine postoperative CT after shunt placement for adult hydrocephalus. We retrospectively reviewed 173 patients who underwent frontal VP shunting for various neurosurgical conditions. Radiological outcomes were proximal catheter malposition, and ventricular width in preoperative and postoperative imaging. Clinical outcomes included postoperative neurological outcome, revision surgery because of catheter malposition or other causes, mortality, and finally surgical, non-surgical, and overall morbidity. In only 3 (1.7%) patients did the early routine postoperative CT lead to revision surgery. Diagnostic ratios for CT finding 1 asymptomatic patient who eventually underwent revision surgery per total number to scan were 1:58 for shunt malposition, 1:86 for hygroma, and 1:173 for a cranial bleed. Five (2.9%) patients with clinically asymptomatic shunt malposition or hygroma underwent intervention based on early postoperative CT (diagnostic ratio 1:25). Shunt malposition occurred in no patient with normal pressure hydrocephalus and 2 (40%) patients with stroke. Lower preoperative Evans' Index was a statistically significant predictor for high-grade shunt malposition. We found a rather low yield for early routine postoperative cranial CT after frontal VP-shunt placement. Therefore, careful selection of patients who might benefit, considering the underlying disease and preoperative radiological findings, could reduce unnecessary costs and exposure to radiation.

Objective Incidental durotomy (ID) during lumbar spine surgery is a frequent complication of growing clinical relevance as the number and complexity of spinal procedures increases. Yet, there is still a lack of guidelines for the treatment of ID with a large heterogeneity of established surgical techniques. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of dural suturing in patients having ID during degenerative lumbar spine surgery, compared with other dural closure techniques. Methods Of 1173 consecutive patients undergoing degenerative lumbar spine surgery from July 2013 to March 2015, in 64 (5.4%) patients 69 (5.8%) IDs occurred. The patients were divided into 3 groups depending on the dural closure technique used: group A, sole dural suture ( n = 12, 19%); group B, patch only (TachoSil and/or muscle and/or fat) ( n = 22, 32%); group C, dural suture in combination with a patch ( n = 34, 49%). The primary end point was revision surgery caused by complications of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after 6 weeks. The secondary end points were operation time and hospitalization time, as well as surgical morbidity. Results The 3 groups showed no significant difference in rates of revision surgery (group A: n = 1, 1.4%; group B: n = 4, 5.8%; group C: n = 3; 4.3%; P = 0.5). Furthermore, no significant difference for hospitalization time, operation time, and clinical outcome was found. Extent of ID, American Society of Anesthesiology score, postoperative immobilization, and insertion of a drainage tube were not associated with higher rates of revision surgery. Applying suction once a drainage tube was placed was found to be a significant risk factor for revision surgery ( P = 0.003). Furthermore, patients undergoing revision surgery had a significantly higher body mass index (33 kg/m 2 vs. 26.37 kg/m 2 ; P = 0.006; odds ratio 1.252; P = 0.004). Conclusions Based on our results, the dural closure technique after ID does not seem to influence revision surgery rates due to cerebrospinal fluid leakage and its complications. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm our results.