Search

Background The Spanish Melanoma Group (GEM) developed a national registry of patients with melanoma infected by SARS-CoV-2 ( GRAVID ).Methods The main objective was to describe the COVID-19 fatality rate in patients with melanoma throughout the pandemic, as well as to explore the effect of melanoma treatment and tumor stage on the risk of COVID-19 complications. These are the final data of the register, including cases from February 2020 to September 2021.Results One hundred-fifty cases were registered. Median age was 68 years (range 6-95), 61 (40%) patients were females, and 63 (42%) patients had stage IV. Thirty-nine (26%) were on treatment with immunotherapy, and 17 (11%) with BRAF-MEK inhibitors. COVID-19 was resolved in 119 cases, including 85 (57%) patients cured, 15 (10%) that died due to melanoma, and 20 (13%) that died due to COVID-19. Only age over 60 years, cardiovascular disorders, and diabetes mellitus increased the risk of death due to COVID-19, but not advanced melanoma stage nor melanoma systemic therapies. Three waves have been covered by the register: February-May 2020, August-November 2020, and December 2020-April 2021. The first wave had the highest number of registered cases and COVID-19 mortality.Conclusion Tumor stage or melanoma treatments are non-significant prognostic factors for COVID-19 mortality. During the pandemic in Spain there was a downward trend in the number of patients registered across the waves, as well as in the severity of the infection.

Combination treatment with BRAF (BRAFi) plus MEK inhibitors (MEKi) has demonstrated survival benefit in patients with advanced melanoma harboring activating BRAF mutations. Previous preclinical studies suggested that an intermittent dosing of these drugs could delay the emergence of resistance. Contrary to expectations, the first published phase 2 randomized study comparing continuous versus intermittent schedule of dabrafenib (BRAFi) plus trametinib (MEKi) demonstrated a detrimental effect of the “on−off” schedule. Here we report confirmatory data from the Phase II randomized open-label clinical trial comparing the antitumoral activity of the standard schedule versus an intermittent combination of vemurafenib (BRAFi) plus cobimetinib (MEKi) in advanced BRAF mutant melanoma patients (NCT02583516). The trial did not meet its primary endpoint of progression free survival (PFS) improvement. Our results show that the antitumor activity of the experimental intermittent schedule of vemurafenib plus cobimetinib is not superior to the standard continuous schedule. Detection of BRAF mutation in cell free tumor DNA has prognostic value for survival and its dynamics has an excellent correlation with clinical response, but not with progression. NGS analysis demonstrated de novo mutations in resistant cases., Whether intermittent strategies of delivering drugs can improve cancer patients survival is still unclear. Here, the authors reports the results of a randomized phase II clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of two dosing regimens (continuous and intermittent) of vemurafenib and cobimetinib combination as first-line treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic advanced melanoma with BRAFV600 mutation

Vulvar malignant melanoma is the second most common subtype of vulvar cancer, accounting for 5–10% of all vulvar cancers. The prognosis is still very poor, although some advances have been achieved in the last years. One of the most significant changes in its management has been the development of less invasive surgical techniques that diminish the risk of postoperative morbidity and long-lasting sequelae. In this article, we review the surgical management of the pathology, based on the comment of 3 cases with vulvar melanoma treated at our institution.

Background: Patients with cancers driven by BRAF Class II (C II) or C III alterations and/or NRAS mutations are unlikely to benefit from approved BRAF-targeted therapies and have few other treatment options. Exarafenib is a potentially best in class orally available pan-RAF inhibitor optimized for potency & high selectivity. It has differentiated dose-dependent activity across a broad range of cell lines & models driven by BRAF C I (inc. those with acquired resistance to 1st gen RAFi), C II, C III or NRAS alterations. Methods: KN-8701 (NCT04913285) is an ongoing Phase 1 dose escalation & dose expansion study at 35 sites in 7 countries evaluating exarafenib monotherapy in participants (pts) with advanced solid tumors harboring oncogenic BRAF or NRAS alterations. Results: Preliminary results as of 13 Dec 2022 are reported for 52 pts (median age 63, 51.9% male) with a median of 3 prior therapies treated in 6 dose levels. Treated pts included those with solid tumors driven by BRAF C I (38.5%), C II (19.2%), C III (28.8%) alterations or melanoma pts with NRAS mutations (13.5%). Steady state exarafenib exposure (Cmax and AUC) increased dose proportionally. Pathway inhibition & decreases in ctDNA were observed across BRAF classes & tumor types. Dose limiting toxicities observed at the highest dose level were Grade 3 (Gr3) acneiform rash & Gr3 macular rash. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to be 300 mg bid. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (any grade) occurred in 69.2% of pts with 13.5% of pts having Gr ≥3 events. Skin AEs (any grade) were the most common TRAEs observed in 48.1% of pts with 7.7% of pts having Gr ≥ 3 skin events. GI TRAEs occurred in 19.2% pts (Gr 1-2 only), including diarrhea (1 pt, Gr 1). Reversible, asymptomatic Gr 3 increased ALT and/or increased AST AEs in 3 pts were the only non-skin Gr ≥ 3 TRAEs reported in ≥ 2 pts. At therapeutically relevant exposures, there was no cutaneous evidence of paradoxical activation. Of the 34 pts across all dose levels with at least 1 post-baseline tumor assessment, 6 pts (17.6%) had a partial response (5 confirmed at submission date) & 16 pts (47.1%) had stable disease including 8 pts (23.5%) with objective tumor shrinkage (up to 20%). The 6 responders all continue exarafenib therapy (treatment duration up to 12 months) and include 3 pts with BRAF C I alteration-driven cancers (inc. 1 RAFi + MEKi pre-treated melanoma pt) and 1 pt each with BRAF C II, BRAF C III-driven & NRAS-mutation driven cancers. For pts who achieved or confirmed their best response at MTD, the response rate was 33% (4/12) & included responses in pts with BRAF C I, C II, C III, and NRAS mutant tumors. Conclusions: Exarafenib achieves therapeutically meaningful drug exposures and demonstrates promising tolerability & clinical activity in BRAF or NRAS alteration-driven solid tumors. Pt enrollment & exarafenib treatment at 300 mg bid continues. Citation Format: Alexander Spira, Valentina Gambardella, Shumei Kato, Cesar Batista Perez, Meredith Mckean, Maria Gonzalez Cao, Richard Kim, Chris T Chen, Antoine Italiano, Philippe Cassier, Janice Mehnert, Bartosz Chmielowski, Gerri Lee, Paul Severson, Caro Unger, Xiaowei Guan, Richard Williams, Georgina Long. Trials in progress: a global phase 1/1b clinical trial evaluating exarafenib (KIN-2787), a highly selective pan-RAF inhibitor, in adult patients with BRAF-altered solid tumors and NRAS mutant melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 2 (Clinical Trials and Late-Breaking Research); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(8_Suppl):Abstract nr CT032.

Simple Summary We present eight core attributes of cancer growth that we must address for a more effective treatment than we currently have. To do this we outline why a regimen simultaneously using many different drugs will be needed. At our current state of knowledge, even adding two or three drugs will not counter all the growth attributes of a currently incurable cancer. We show in this paper, the details of how an example six drug regimen, when added alongside of current traditional treatments, might inhibit enough of the eight core growth driving elements to allow those standard treatments to be more effective. We further show how medicines from general medical practice used to treat pain, fungal infections, psychosis, leprosy and other non-cancer related illnesses can be repurposed to block cancer cells' survival pathways and growth drives. In part one of this two-part paper, we present eight principles that we believe must be considered for more effective treatment of the currently incurable cancers. These are addressed by multidrug adjunctive cancer treatment (MDACT), which uses multiple repurposed non-oncology drugs, not primarily to kill malignant cells, but rather to reduce the malignant cells' growth drives. Previous multidrug regimens have used MDACT principles, e.g., the CUSP9v3 glioblastoma treatment. MDACT is an amalgam of (1) the principle that to be effective in stopping a chain of events leading to an undesired outcome, one must break more than one link; (2) the principle of Palmer et al. of achieving fractional cancer cell killing via multiple drugs with independent mechanisms of action; (3) the principle of shaping versus decisive operations, both being required for successful cancer treatment; (4) an idea adapted from Chow et al., of using multiple cytotoxic medicines at low doses; (5) the idea behind CUSP9v3, using many non-oncology CNS-penetrant drugs from general medical practice, repurposed to block tumor survival paths; (6) the concept from chess that every move creates weaknesses and strengths; (7) the principle of mass-by adding force to a given effort, the chances of achieving the goal increase; and (8) the principle of blocking parallel signaling pathways. Part two gives an example MDACT regimen, gMDACT, which uses six repurposed drugs-celecoxib, dapsone, disulfiram, itraconazole, pyrimethamine, and telmisartan-to interfere with growth-driving elements common to cholangiocarcinoma, colon adenocarcinoma, glioblastoma, and non-small-cell lung cancer. gMDACT is another example of-not a replacement for-previous multidrug regimens already in clinical use, such as CUSP9v3. MDACT regimens are designed as adjuvants to be used with cytotoxic drugs.

BackgroundThe Food and Drug Administration recommends that people living with HIV (PWH) with a CD4+ T cell count (CD4) ≥350 cells/µL may be eligible for any cancer clinical trial, but there is reluctance to enter patients with lower CD4 counts into cancer studies, including immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) studies. Patients with relapsed or refractory cancers may have low CD4 due to prior cancer therapies, irrespective of HIV status. It is unclear how baseline CD4 prior to ICI impacts the proportion of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) and whether it differs by HIV status in ICI treated patients.MethodsWe conducted a pilot retrospective cohort study of participants eligible for ICI for advanced cancers from three phase 1/2 trials in the USA and Spain. We determined whether baseline CD4 counts differed by HIV status and whether the effect of CD4 counts on incidence of TEAE was modified by HIV status using a multivariable logistic regression model.ResultsOf 122 participants, 66 (54%) were PWH who received either pembrolizumab or durvalumab and 56 (46%) were HIV-negative who received bintrafusp alfa. Median CD4 at baseline was 320 cells/µL (IQR 210–495) among PWH and 356 cells/µL (IQR 260–470) among HIV-negative participants (p=0.5). Grade 3 or worse TEAE were recorded among 7/66 (11%) PWH compared with 7/56 (13%) among HIV-negative participants. When adjusted for prior therapies, age, sex, and race, the effect of baseline CD4 on incidence of TEAE was not modified by HIV status for any TEAE (interaction term p=0.7), or any grade ≥3 TEAE (interaction term p=0.1).ConclusionsThere was no significant difference in baseline CD4 or the proportions of any TEAE and grade ≥3 TEAE by HIV status. CD4 count thresholds for cancer clinical trials should be carefully reviewed to avoid unnecessarily excluding patients with HIV and cancer.

Background: Previous reports indicate that lung cancer patients are at an increased risk of severe COVID-19 disease and higher mortality rate compared to general population. However, prognostic factors are not yet clearly identified. The LunG canceR pAtients coVid19 Disease (GRAVID) study aimed to describe clinical characteristics, outcomes and predictors of poor prognosis in patients with lung cancer and COVID-19. Methods: In this large nationwide prospective study, medical records of lung cancer patients with COVID-19 diagnosis from 65 spanish hospitals were included. Clinical features, treatments and disease outcomes were collected. The primary endpoint was to determine any-cause mortality; secondary endpoints were hospitalization and admission at intensive care units (ICU). Risk factors of poor prognosis were identified by univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Results: Overal, 447 patients were analysed. Mean age was 67.1 ± 9·8 years, and the majority were men (332, 74·3%) and current/former smokers (383 (85.7%). NSCLC was the most frequent cancer type (377, 84.5%), being adenocarcinoma (228, 51·0%) the predominant histology. 354 patients (79.2%) had unresectable stage III or metastatic disease, and 266 (59.5%) where receiving anticancer treatment, mostly first-line chemotherapy. 350 (78.3%) patients were hospitalized for a mean of 13·4 ± 11·4 days, 9 (2.0%) patients were admitted to ICU, and 146 (32.7%) patients died. Advanced disease and corticosteroid treatment at hospitalization were predictors of mortality. Non-terminal stage hospitalized patients with lymphocytopenia and high LDH showed an increased risk of death. Severity of COVID-19 correlated to mortality, admission at ICU and mechanical ventilation. Conclusion: With underlying comorbidities and immunocompromised status, patients with lung cancer and COVID-19 present high hospitalization and mortality rates. These outcomes, alongside the identification of prognostic factors, may inform physicians on risks and benefits for this population to provide individualized oncological care. Citation Format: Jose Maria Mazarico Gallego, Antonio Calles, Monica Antoñanzas, Cristina Pangua, Xabier Mielgo Rubio, Ernest Nadal, Rafael Lopez Castro, Ana Lopez-Martin, Edel del Barco, Manuel Domine, Virginia Calvo, Pilar Diz, Carmen Sandoval, Elia Sais Girona, Ivana Gabriela Sullivan, M. Angeles Sala, Gema Garcia Ledo, Jose Ramon Jarabo, Rosa Alvarez Alvarez, Javier Baena, Maria Gonzalez-Cao, Mariano Provencio. COVID-19 disease in patients with lung cancer in Spain: GRAVID Lung Cancer Patients Disease (GRAVID study) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Virtual Meeting: COVID-19 and Cancer; 2021 Feb 3-5. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2021;27(6_Suppl):Abstract nr S12-04.

BackgroundIntratumoral immunotherapies are being tested in different solid tumors. They trigger local and systemic responses.1 2 BO-112 is a double stranded RNA nanoplexed with polyethyleneimine (PEI), which mimics a viral infection and mobilizes the immune system.In preclinical models and in a first in human clinical trial BO-112 activated dendritic cells, induced CD-8 infiltration, apoptosis and enhancement of immunogenic cell death and achieved an objective response in 2 out of 10 patients with melanoma with primary resistance to antiPD-1.3 4MethodsIn this phase 2 study, BO-112 plus pembrolizumab is evaluated in patients with advanced melanoma, who have developed progressive disease while on or within 12 weeks after anti-PD1/PD-L1 based therapy (either as first line or as adjuvant treatment). BO-112 is administered intratumorally once weekly in 1 to 8 tumor lesions, total dose 1 to 2 mg, for the first 7 weeks and thereafter every three weeks; pembrolizumab 200 mg is administered intravenously every three weeks. Overall response rate (ORR) is analyzed as primary endpoint by independent reviewer. Secondary objectives include disease control rate (DCR), duration of response and progression free survival (PFS); response assessment is done by RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST; in addition, CD-8 and PD-L1 IHC, NGS, itRECIST and radiomics signatures are prospectively assessed. Key eligibility criteria include cutaneous or mucosal melanoma with known BRAF status; at least one lesion RECIST 1.1 measurable and amenable for IT injection. Enrollment has been completed on 26th August.ResultsWith 26 evaluable patients with a first response assessment, seven have progressive disease (PD), five have partial response (PR) and fourteen patients show stable disease (SD). Preliminary ORR is 19.2% and DCR is 73.1% at week 8. Three patients with PR at week 8 have undergone a second assessment at week 16, with further decrease in sum of diameters (SOD) in both injected and non-injected lesions. Three out of five patients with SD and a second assessment maintain SD, showing a decrease in SOD in two cases (figure 1). In addition, two patients with only skin lesions have a pathological complete response. CD8 and PD-L1 have increased in 8 and 7 out of 13 patients with paired biopsies, being related with clinical benefit (figure 2).Abstract 961 Figure 1Swimmer plot, efficacy data for evaluable patients undergoing at least one response assessmentAbstract 961 Figure 2Immunohistochemistry data for CPS and CD8 data from paired biopsiesConclusionsDespite these data being preliminary, there is a trend for benefit in terms of ORR and also in long lasting stable diseases. BO-112 is able to increase PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and increase CD8-T cell infiltrates.AcknowledgementsMerck, Pivotal SLU, Quibim radiomics, Pangaea laboratories, all participating sites and patientsTrial RegistrationNCT04570332ReferencesAznar MA, Planelles L, Perez-Olivares M, et al. Immunotherapeutic effects of intratumoral nanoplexed poly I:C. J Immunother Cancer. 2019 May 2;7(1):116.5. Hamid O, Ismail R, Puzanov I. Intratumoral immunotherapy-update 2019. The Oncologist 2020;25:e423–438.Márquez-Rodas I, Longo F, Rodríguez-Ruiz M, et al. Intratumoral nanoplexed poly I:C BO-112 in combination with systemic anti-PD-1 for patients with anti-PD-1-refractory tumors. Sci Transl Med 2020 Oct 14;12(565):eabb0391.Kalbasi A, Tariveranmoshabad M, Hakimi K, Kremer S, et al. A. Uncoupling interferon signaling and antigen presentation to overcome immunotherapy resistance due to JAK1 loss in melanoma. Sci Transl Med 2020 Oct 14;12(565):eabb0152.Ethics ApprovalThe study obtained ethics approval by Spanish Health Agency (AEMPS), on 11th December 2020, and French Health Agency (ANSM) on 27th January 2021; study obtained approval from two Ethics Committee: Vall D’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain on 7th December 2020 (number 467), and Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France, CPP 20.11.10.38825 on 11th February 2021.For each study patient, written informed consent is obtained prior to any protocol-related activities. As part of this procedure, the principal investigator or one of his/her associates must explain orally and in writing the nature, duration, and purpose of the study, and the action of the study drug in such a manner that the patient is aware of the potential risks, inconveniences, or adverse effects that may occur. They should be informed that the patient may withdraw from the study at any time. They will receive all information that is required by the regulatory authorities and ICH guidelines. The ICF has been signed by the patient and a copy provided to them.ConsentN/A

BackgroundA significant number of melanoma patients treated with anti-PD-1 alone or in combination with anti-CTLA-4 have transient or no response to treatment. Sotigalimab is a CD40 agonist antibody with unique epitope specificity and Fc receptor binding profile for optimal therapeutic application. Preclinical studies suggest that sotigalimab can be combined with PD-1 blockade to trigger effective anti-tumor immunity. We conducted a multi-center, open label, Phase Ib-parallel arm phase II trial (NCT03123783) to evaluate the combination of sotigalimab with nivolumab in subjects with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 refractory metastatic melanoma.MethodsThe study objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sotigalimab in combination with nivolumab in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 refractory advanced melanoma patients. Subjects received sotigalimab (0.3mg/kg) combined with nivolumab (360mg) every 3 weeks. Thirty-eight subjects with unresectable or metastatic melanoma who had confirmed progressive disease during treatment with anti-PD-1 therapy (documented by 2 consecutive tumor assessments) were enrolled (evaluable for safety) and 33 subjects were evaluable for efficacy.ResultsSix subjects had PR (including one unconfirmed PR) for an ORR of 18%. The mDOR was 18.7 months. Two subjects with PR received treatment for >2 years. Three of the six responding subjects remain off all therapy for ≥26 months, and one patient required stereotactic radiosurgery to a single brain lesion ten months after stopping therapy and has not required additional local or systemic therapy since. Three additional subjects had prolonged SD (12.6, 7.6, 6.2 months). The DCR was 48% and 33% of subjects experienced reduction in target lesions. Efficacy was observed in patients regardless of their tumor PD-L1 expression. The overall safety profile of the combination is consistent with the profiles of individual agents. The majority of AEs observed were of mild to moderate intensity (CTCAE Grade ≤2). The most commonly observed AEs were: pyrexia, chills, nausea, fatigue, pruritus, transaminitis, headache, asthenia, myalgia, rash, vomiting and arthralgia. There were no Grade 4 or 5 AEs related to study drugs. There were no treatment discontinuations due to AEs.ConclusionsThe combination of sotigalimab and nivolumab demonstrated treatment benefit (tumor response or prolonged disease control) in anti-PD-1/PD-L1 refractory melanoma patients with an overall favorable safety and tolerability profile. Notably, a subset of patients remain in response off treatment for ≥26 months. These results warrant further study of this combination in advanced, refractory melanoma.AcknowledgementsWe extend our gratitude to the patients and their families who made this trial possible and the clinical study teams involved in this trial. We thank BMS for providing the nivolumab for this study.Trial RegistrationNCT03123783Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards at Yale University (#20170300), University of Nebraska Medical Center (#543-18-CB) and The Hospital Regional de Málaga (#19.03.1341E1-GHM).

Background: Prediction of response to immunotherapy remains an unmet need in the field of advanced melanoma. Methods: Computational analyses, including probabilistic graphical models, sparse k-means, and consensus cluster, were used to characterize melanoma TCGA samples. The implication of the identified processes in response to immunotherapy was then studied in an independent cohort of 53 patients with advanced melanoma and treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Paraffin samples from this cohort were analyzed using RNA-seq and mass-spectrometry proteomics. Results: In the TCGA cohort, there were two different layers of information: one related to molecular features of the tumor (based on keratinization, melanogenesis, and extracellular space), and one related to immune status. Therefore, two independent classifications of TCGA melanoma samples were established: molecular and immune. The immune classification distinguished between responders and not responders to immunotherapy in the second cohort (p= 0.0006, HR=6.52). Finally, high-throughput proteomics was used to characterize molecular mechanisms involved in response to immunotherapy, identifying several biological processes and proteins that may be relevant in treatment selection for patients who do not respond. Conclusions: We established that the immune information was independent of tumor molecular features in melanomas included in the TCGA. An immune classification of these tumors was established. This immune classification predicted response to immunotherapy in a new cohort of patients with advanced melanoma treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Finally, proteomics was used to identify possible targets in those patients who did not respond to immunotherapy. Citation Format: Lucia Trilla-Fuertes, Guillermo Prado-Vazquez, Angelo Gámez-Pozo, Rocio Lopez-Vacas, Maria Isabel Lumbreras Herrera, Virtudes Soriano, Fernando Garicano, Maria Jose Lecumberri, Maria Rodriguez, Margarita Majem, Elisabeth Perez, Maria Gonzalez-Cao, Juana Oramas, Alejandra Magdaleno, Joaquin Fra, Alfonso Martin, Monica Corral, Teresa Puertolas, Juan Angel Fresno Vara, Enrique Espinosa. RNA-seq and proteomics to identify response to immunotherapy in advanced melanoma: a Spanish Melanoma Group Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5416.

Somatic copy number variations (CNV, i.e., amplifications and deletions) have been implicated in the origin and development of multiple cancers and some of these aberrations are designated targets for therapies. Although FISH is still considered the gold standard for CNV detection, the increasing number of potentially druggable amplifications to be assessed makes a gene-by-gene approach time- and tissue-consuming. Here we investigated the potential of next generation sequencing (NGS) custom panels to simultaneously determine CNVs across FFPE solid tumor samples. DNA was purified from cell lines and FFPE samples and analyzed by NGS sequencing using a 20-gene custom panel in the GeneReader Platform®. CNVs were identified using an in-house algorithm based on the UMI read coverage. Retrospective validation of in-house algorithm to identify CNVs showed 97.1% concordance rate with the NGS custom panel. The prospective analysis was performed in a cohort of 243 FFPE samples from patients arriving at our hospital, which included 74 NSCLC tumors, 148 CRC tumors, and 21 other tumors. Of them, 33% presented CNVs by NGS and in 14 cases (5.9%) the CNV was the only alteration detected. We have identified CNV alterations in about one-third of our cohort, including FGFR1, CDK6, CDK4, EGFR, MET, ERBB2, BRAF, or KRAS. Our work highlights the need to include CNV testing as a part of routine NGS analysis in order to uncover clinically relevant gene amplifications that can guide the selection of therapies.

Tractament adjuvant; Melanoma; Escenificació Adjuvant treatment; Melanoma; Staging Tratamiento adyuvante; Melanoma; Escenificación Melanoma affects about 6000 patients a year in Spain. A group of medical oncologists from Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and Spanish Multidisciplinary Melanoma Group (GEM) has designed these guidelines to homogenize the management of these patients. The diagnosis must be histological and determination of BRAF status has to be performed in patients with stage ≥ III. Stage I–III resectable melanomas will be treated surgically. In patients with stage III melanoma, adjuvant treatment with immunotherapy or targeted therapy is also recommended. Patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma will receive treatment with immunotherapy or targeted therapy, the optimal sequence of these treatments remains unclear. Brain metastases require a separate consideration, since, in addition to systemic treatment, they may require local treatment. Patients must be followed up closely to receive or change treatment as soon as their previous clinical condition changes, since multiple therapeutic options are available.

Background: This study evaluated efficacy and safety of palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, in heavilypretreated hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/ HER2(-)) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients during the compassionate use program in Spain from February 2015 to November 2017. Patients and methods: Patient data were collected retrospectively from 35 hospitals in Spain. Patients with HR+/HER2(-) mBC who had progressed on >= 4 treatments for advanced disease were eligible. Results: A total of 219 patients received palbociclib in combination with aromatase inhibitors (110; 50.2%), fulvestrant (87; 39.7%), tamoxifen (8; 3.6%) or as single agent (10; 4.6%). Mean age of the patients was 58 years; 31 patients (16.1%) were premenopausal and 162 (83.9%) were postmenopausal at the beginning of treatment with palbociclib. Patients had received a median of 3 previous lines of endocrine therapy (ET) for advanced disease. Real-world tumor response (rwTR) and clinical benefit rate were 5.9% (n = 13) and 46.2% (n = 101), respectively. The median real world progression-free survival (rwPFS) was 6.0 months (95% CI 5.7-7.0) and the median overall survival was 19.0 months (95% CI 16.4-21.7). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant difference in median rwPFS in patients treated with palbociclib plus fulvestrant depending on the duration of prior treatment with fulvestrant monotherapy (>6 versus, This study was sponsored by Biomedical Research Foundation of the Hospital Clinico San Carlos (Madrid, Spain). The study was funded by an investigator sponsored research grant (WI236789) from Pfizer.

Background: Covid-19 pandemic by the new coronavirus SARS-Cov-2 has produced devastating effects on the health care system, affecting also cancer patient care. Data about COVID-19 infection in cancer patients are scarce, and they point out a higher risk of complications due to the viral infection in this population. Moreover, cancer treatments could increase viral complications, specially those treatments based on the use of immunotherapy with checkpoints antibodies. There are no clinical data about the safety of immune check point antibodies in cancer patients when they become infected by SARS-CoV-2. As checkpoint inhibitors, mainly anti PD-1 and anti CTLA-4 antibodies, are an effective treatment for most melanoma patients, avoiding their use during the pandemic could lead to a decrease in the chances of curing melanoma. Methods: In Spain we have started a national registry of melanoma patients infected by SARS-Cov-2 since April 1st, 2020. A retrospective analysis of patients included in the Spanish registery has been performed weekly since the activation of the study. Interim analysis shows unexpected findings about cancer treatment safety in SARS-Cov-2 infected melanoma patients, so a rapid communication to the scientific community is mandatory Results: Fifty patients have been included as of May 17th, 2020. Median age is 69 years (range 6 to 94 years), 27 (54%) patients are males and 36 (70%) patients have stage IV melanoma. Twenty-two (44%) patients were on active anticancer treatment with anti PD-1 antibodies, 16 (32%) patients were on treatment with BRAF plus MEK inhibitors and 12 (24%) patients were not on active cancer treatment. COVID-19 episode has been resolved in 43 cases, including 30 (70%) patients cured, four (9%) patients that have died due to melanoma progression, and nine (21%) patients that have died from COVID-19. Mortality rates from COVID-19 according to melanoma treatment type were 16%, 15% and 36% for patients on immunotherapy, targeted drugs, and for those that were not undergoing active cancer treatment, respectively. Conclusion: These preliminary findings show that the risk of death in those patients undergoing treatment with anti PD-1 antibodies does not exceed the global risk of death in this population. These results could be relevant in order to select melanoma therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic

Altres ajuts: This research was sponsored in part by Grifols and by Merck Sharp & Dohme España, S.A. (IISP 54925). The funding organizations had no input in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to submit the study for publication. NH received a post-doctoral grant from the Jaqueline Beytout Foundation. FG received the support of "José María Segovia de Arana" contracts (2019) and MMT from the NIH (R01AI143457). Small viral reservoirs are found predominantly in HIV-1 controllers and individuals treated during acute/early HIV-1 infection. However, other HIV + individuals could naturally also harbour low viral reservoirs. We screened 451 HIV-1-infected treated-individuals with suppressed plasma viremia for at least 3 years and stored cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Total HIV-DNA was analysed in PBMCs with ddPCR. Individuals with 50 HIV-DNA copies/10 6 PBMCs) to analyse total HIV-DNA, T-cell and NK-cell populations, HIV-1 specific antibodies, and plasma inflammation markers. We found that 9.3% of the individuals screened had

We studied MET alterations in 474 advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients by nCounter, an RNA‐based technique. We identified 3% with METΔex14 mRNA and 3.5% with very‐high MET mRNA expression, a surrogate of MET amplification. MET alterations identified by nCounter correlated with clinical benefit from MET inhibitors. Quantitative mRNA‐based techniques can improve the selection of patients for MET‐targeted therapies., MET inhibitors have shown activity in non‐small‐cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC) with MET amplification and exon 14 skipping (METΔex14). However, patient stratification is imperfect, and thus, response rates have varied widely. Here, we studied MET alterations in 474 advanced NSCLC patients by nCounter, an RNA‐based technique, together with next‐generation sequencing (NGS), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR), exploring correlation with clinical benefit. Of the 474 samples analyzed, 422 (89%) yielded valid results by nCounter, which identified 13 patients (3%) with METΔex14 and 15 patients (3.5%) with very‐high MET mRNA expression. These two subgroups were mutually exclusive, displayed distinct phenotypes and did not generally coexist with other drivers. For METΔex14, 3/8 (37.5%) samples positive by nCounter tested negative by NGS. Regarding patients with very‐high MET mRNA, 92% had MET amplification by FISH and/or NGS. However, FISH failed to identify three patients (30%) with very‐high MET RNA expression, among which one received MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment deriving clinical benefit. Our results indicate that quantitative mRNA‐based techniques can improve the selection of patients for MET‐targeted therapies.

IMPORTANCE: Therapies targeting the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor or its ligand (PD-L1), such as the humanized monoclonal antibody durvalumab, have shown durable clinical responses in several tumor types. However, concerns about the safety and feasibility of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in HIV-1-infected individuals have led to the exclusion of these patients from clinical trials on cancer immunotherapies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of durvalumab treatment in patients with advanced cancer and virologically controlled HIV-1 infection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The DURVAST study was a nonrandomized, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial in patients with any solid tumor type in which anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies have approved indications or for which there are data of antitumoral activity with no other available curative therapy. All patients had basal undetectable plasma viremia while undergoing combination antiretroviral therapy. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment consisted of intravenous infusion of durvalumab (1500 mg every 4 weeks) until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Adverse events were graded with the use of the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03. Tumor response was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. RESULTS: A total of 20 HIV-1-infected patients with advanced cancer were enrolled; 16 (80%) were male, the median (range) age was 54 (30-73) years, and 12 (60%) had progressed with previous cancer treatment lines. A median (range) of 4 (1-16) cycles of durvalumab were administered. Drug-related adverse events were observed in 50% of patients, and all were grade 1 and 2 (mainly diarrhea, asthenia, and arthromyalgia). Four of 16 response-evaluable patients (25%) had a partial response. Five patients (31%) had stable disease, including 4 with durable stable disease (disease control rate of 50%). CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell counts and plasma HIV-1 viremia remained stable throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Durvalumab treatment was feasible and safe in HIV-1-infected patients with cancer receiving combination antiretroviral therapy. HIV-1-infected patients on suppressive antiretroviral therapy with advanced cancer should have access to cancer immunotherapy treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03094286.

Introduction: Stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer patients with mutations in the EGF receptor gene (EGFR) usually derive clinical benefit from to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) but ultimately relapse. In preclinical studies, we have showed that anti-EGF antibodies generated by vaccination significantly increased the antitumor activity of TKIs in EGFR-mut cell lines, blocking EGFR, Erk1/2, Akt and STAT3 activation and delaying emergence of resistance. Based on these findings, the EPICAL trial was initiated (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03623750). Methods: The EPICAL was a single arm, phase 1b, single arm study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of first line anti-EGF vaccination combined with afatinib. The trial enrolled advanced NSCLC patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations confirmed in a central laboratory. Patients received 40 mg/day of afatinib and five intramuscular anti-EGF vaccinations every 14 days and then every three months until progression. Four medical centers in Spain participated, with a target enrollment of 30 patients. However, the COVID-19 outbreak forced an early termination of the study in March 2020 with only 23 patients included. Serial blood samples were collected and used to evaluate the levels of selected growth factors by ELISA and biological activity by addition of sera to in vitro cultures of EGFR-mut cells followed by Western blotting. Results: Of the 23 patients enrolled in the trial, nine (39%) had exon 19 in-frame deletions, twelve (52%) exon 21 substitutions and two (9%) exon 18 missense mutations. Combination treatment was well tolerated and no SAES related to anti-EGF vaccination were reported. Objective response and disease control rates were 78.3% (95%CI=53.6-92.5) and 95.7% (95%CI=78.1-99.9), respectively. At data cut-off, with a median follow-up of 11.4 months (95%CI=8.1-15.2), the median progression-free survival was 17.4 months (95% CI=13.22-NA) and median survival not reached (95% CI=15.21-NA). Median PFS for patients with exon 19 deletions and exon 21 point mutations were 13.9 months (95%CI=8.7-NR) and 17.4 months (95%CI=13.2-NR), respectively. Three months after initiation of treatment, high titers of anti-EGF antibodies were detected in all patients and serum EGF and TGFα levels were found to be significantly lower compared to baseline levels. Finally, treatment with post-vaccination patient’s sera inhibited EGFR, AKT and ERK1/2 phosphorylation in EGFR-mut cells growing in vitro. Conclusion: The combination of an anti–EGF vaccine with afatinib is well tolerated and induces a sustained immunogenic effect. Vaccination against EGF might enhance the clinical efficacy of EGFR TKIs. Keywords: anti-EGF vaccination, EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR inhibitors

Background: Fusions involving the tyrosine kinase receptor genes ALK, ROS1, RET, NTRK or MET exon 14 skipping variant (METex14) are present in a significant percentage of advanced solid tumors and their accurate identification is critical to guide targeted therapies. While FISH has traditionally been considered the gold standard for fusion analysis, it is costly and shows biases. GeneReader Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) (Qiagen) and nCounter (Nanostring) are two technologies allowing simultaneous detection of fusion transcripts and splicing variants. In this work we compared the performance of both platforms for fusion and splicing variant detection in advanced solid tumor patients. Methods: RNAs from 40 selected solid tumors were purified using High Pure FFPET RNA Isolation Kit (Hoffman-La Roche) and prospectively analyzed by GeneReader and nCounter. The custom nCounter codeset used targets fusions involving ALK, ROS1, RET, NTRK1-3, NRG1 and MET exon 14 skipping variant based on a dual strategy: detection of specific fusion transcripts and imbalances between the 3' and 5' mRNA regions, enabling the recognition of even those fusions not identified with the specific primers. Reporter counts from nCounter were collected with the nSolver Analysis software (Nanostring) and analyzed using an algorithm developed in the laboratory. The design of QIAact Lung Fusion Custom GeneReader panel contains specific junction probes for the detection of fusions in ALK, ROS1, RET, FGFR1- 3, NRG1, NTRK1- 3, EGFR, BRAF, and MET exon 14 skipping variant. GeneReader analysis and interpretation were performed with the QCI-Analyze and QCI-Interpret software's (Qiagen). Results: Valid results were obtained for 40/40 (100%) of samples tested. Paired analysis showed a 97.5% concordance (39/40 cases) between the results obtained by nCounter and GeneReader NGS, corresponding to a Cohen's kappa of 0.935 [CI=0.809-1.0]. Overall, 8 samples tested positive for fusion transcripts, namely EML4-ALK (n=4), CCDC6-RET (n=1), KIF5B-RET (n=1), EZR-ROS1 (n=1) and ETV6-NTRK3 (n=1). In addition, MET exon 14 skipping variant was detected in two samples. The discordant case between nCounter and NGS corresponded to a rare RET fusion only detected by 3'-5' imbalance using nCounter, while the remaining 29 patients were pan-negative. In one of them, an uncommon HLA-DRB1-MET fusion not included in the nCounter codeset, was found by the GeneReader custom panel. Conclusions: RNA-based NGS and nCounter show excellent concordance for detection of gene fusions and MET splicing variant in advanced solid tumors. Citation Format: Mónica Garzón Ibañez, Ana Gimenez-Capitán, Marta Vives Usano, Ruth Román Lladó, Sonia Rodriguez, Erika Aldeguer, Beatriz García Pelaez, Nuria Jordana Ariza, Cristina Aguado, Santiago Viteri, Andrés Aguilar, Irene Moya, Carlos Cabrera, Maria Jose Catalán, Maria Gonzalez cao, Silvia Garcia-Roman, Jordi Bertran Alamillo, Florencia Garcia Casabal, Rafael Rosell, Miguel Angel Molina-Vila, Clara De La Caridad Mayo De Las Casas. Comparison of clinically relevant fusions detection using two multiplexing RNA based platforms: nCounter and GeneReader [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 290.

Background: BO-112 is a double stranded synthetic RNA formulated with polyethyleneimine (PEI), that acts as an agonist to toll-like receptor 3 and targets the cytosolic helicase melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 and retinoic acid-inducible gene I. By mimicking the effect of a viral infection, it mobilizes the immune system, including activation of dendritic cells, CD8 T-cell infiltration, induction of interferons (IFNs), induction of apoptosis and enhancement of immunogenic cell death. Clinical data are available from the first-in-human study (NCT02828098) which evaluated single intratumoral (IT) BO-112 (Part 1; N = 16) and the combination of IT BO-112 with pembrolizumab or nivolumab (Part 2; N = 28). Part 2 showed an ORR of 11% and DCR of 46% in patients with multiple tumor types. Of them, 2 out of 10 (20%) patients with melanoma resistant to anti PD-1 achieved a partial response. Safety profile of BO-112, both as single agent and in combination with anti-PD-1, is manageable and currently characterized by Grade 1 fever and other flu-like symptoms. A phase 2 clinical study of IT BO-112 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with liver metastases from colorectal or gastric/gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients is currently ongoing. Methods: Phase 2, single arm, open label study of IT BO-112 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced and/or metastatic melanoma that have progressed on anti-PD-1-containing treatment (NCT04570332). BO-112 will be administered once weekly (QW) in 1 to 8 tumor lesions, total dose 1-2 mg (depending on the number of injected lesions), for the first 7 weeks and then once every three weeks (Q3W); pembrolizumab 200 mg will be administered Q3W. Key eligibility criteria include histologically confirmed, unresectable cutaneous or mucosal melanoma with known BRAF status. Patients must have progressed on or after treatment with an anti-PD-1/L1 mAb. At least one lesion RECIST 1.1 measurable and amenable for weekly IT injection is needed. Primary efficacy variable is ORR by RECIST 1.1, assessed by independent central radiologist (by QUIBIM Precision platform). Secondary efficacy variables include clinical activity in terms of DCR, DOR, PFS, OS, iRECIST, safety and PKs. Exploratory objectives include itRECIST and evaluation of tumor microenvironment (by Pangaea laboratory). A 1-sided alpha of 4.19% and power of 81.8% are used. A total of 40 patients will be enrolled. If less than 8 patients out of 40 have ORR, the study will not meet the statistical bar. Study was approved on 14 December in Spain; enrollment is open; two sites are active as of 18 December 2020. Nineteen sites (12 in Spain and 7 in France) are planned to be activated. Citation Format: Iván Márquez-Rodas, Miguel Fernández de Sanmamed Gutiérrez, María González Cao, Ana M. Arance, Alfonso Berrocal, Eduardo Castañon, Sofía España, Pablo Cerezuela-Fuentes, Juan F. Rodríguez-Moreno, Pilar López Criado, Juana Oramas, Luis de la Cruz Merino, Stéphane Dalle, Caroline Dutriaux, Julie Charles, Caroline Robert, Brigitte Dréno, Henri Montaudié, Philippe Saiag, Javier Sánchez-López, María Rojas, Helena Escuin-Ordinas, Vanesa Pons Sanz, Sonia Maciá, Marisol Quintero. Phase 2 clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intratumoral BO-112 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced melanoma that have progressive disease on anti-PD-1-based therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT233.

Background: 80% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases are diagnosed at stages IIIB-IV and have a dismal prognosis with a median life expectancy that does not exceed 2 years. In contrast, patients diagnosed at early and locally advanced stages (I-IIIA) can undergo surgery and have the potential to be totally cured. Imaging technologies often detect lung nodules of unknown significance that pose a diagnostic challenge; some patients with benign nodules are submitted to unnecessary surgical interventions while others with small tumors are just kept in observation, risking a significant delay for treatment. A diagnostic test that could differentiate between benign and malignant masses would be of great help in this setting. Methods: Circulating-free RNA (cfRNA) was isolated from the plasma of healthy individuals (N=21), early(I-II) stage (N=22) and stage IIIA (N=12) NSCLC patients, using an automatic extraction method(Qiasymphony, Qiagen). Purified cfRNA was quantified using Qubit, retrotranscribed and pre-amplified (14cycles) using the Low RNA Input Amplification kit (NanoString Technologies). Gene expression analysis was performed on the nCounter platform using the PanCancer IO360TM (NanoString Technologies), which can detect 770 transcripts related to tumor biology, micro-environment and the immune system. Results: Gene expression analysis revealed differential patterns for some cf-mRNAs from localized stage NSCLC patients versus healthy controls. A bioinformatics recursive feature elimination algorithm selected a 16-gene mRNA signature that was able to distinguish between localized NSCLC and control samples with an area under the ROC curve of 0.91 to 0.95. Furthermore, the signature scores derived from the algorithm were significantly different between the two cohorts. Conclusions: We have found an 16-gene signature that can differentiate between cfRNA of localized stages NSCLC patients and control individuals. Our results warrant validation studies in larger cohorts. Citation Format: Ana Giménez Capitán, Jillian Bracht, Nicolas Potie, María González-Cao, Santiago Viteri, Alejandro Martínez-Bueno, Carlos Cabrera-Gálvez, Pablo Rubinstein, Clara Mayo-de-las-Casas, Joselyn Valarezo, Chung-Ying Huang, Carlos Pedraz, Richard Boykind, Sarah Warren, Rafael Rosell, Miguel Ángel Molina-Vilaa, Andrés Aguilar-Hernández. A nCounter-Based mRNA signature in plasma associates with localized non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2606.

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated clinical efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (p). However, ICIs can also trigger a self-reactive response in the adjacent healthy lung tissue that can eventually lead to life-threatening immune-related adverse events (irAEs), like checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP). We hypothesized that a pre-treatment state of chronic inflammation or immune system imbalance could predict which p are at higher risk of developing CIP. Methodology: We retrospectively collected pre-ICI-treatment FFPE tumor tissue and matching plasma samples from 17 CIP- and 24 non-CIP lung cancer p. An additional 40 plasma samples, including 3 CIP and 37 non-CIP p were used as a validation cohort. The miRCURY exosome isolation kit (Qiagen) was used for extracellular vesicle (EV) enrichment from 500 μL of plasma and RNA was extracted using TRI-reagent. EV-mRNA was then pre-amplified (10 cycles) using the Low RNA Input Amplification kit (NanoString Technologies). FFPE mRNA was extracted using the High Pure FFPET RNA Isolation Kit (Roche). Gene expression analysis was performed on tissue and EV-derived mRNA using the NanoString nCounter platform with the Human PanCancer IO360 panel, which targets 770 genes related to tumor biology, immune response and microenvironment. Differential expression (DE) analysis was carried out based on the development of CIP. Finally, a classifier was created using a bioinformatic recursive feature elimination and a leave-one-out cross validation algorithm to predict which combination of genes is most effective to predict CIP development. Results: DE analysis revealed 54 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in pre-treatment tissue of CIP vs. non-CIP p. An 8-gene CIP mRNA signature was able to distinguish between the two cohorts with areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.81-0.95. When analyzing plasma EV samples, we found 57 DEGs. The tissue CIP signature was not translatable to EVs, yielding AUCs of only 0.53-0.54. Therefore, we developed a new 4-gene EV-based mRNA signature that could differentiate CIP vs. non-CIP developing p with AUCs of 0.82-0.90 and an overall accuracy of 89.9%. The negative- and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV) were 92.7% and 78.6%, respectively with a Youden´s index of 0.67. The 4 genes included in the EV signature were upregulated in CIP p and were found to be involved in T-cell activation and immune cell localization to the tumor. Conclusions: We have created a 4-gene EV-mRNA signature that associates with CIP development upon ICI treatment. Our results also indicate that plasma EV-mRNA was non-inferior to invasive tissue biopsy analysis in predicting CIP development. Validation studies in larger patient cohorts are ongoing. Citation Format: Jillian Wilhelmina Bracht, Santiago Viteri-Ramirez, Andrés Aguilar, Silvia Calabuig-Fariñas, Juan José García-Mosquera, Chung-Ying Huang, Elena Duréndez-Sáez, Nicolas Potie, Erika Aldeguer, Ana Gimenez-Capitán, Sonia Rodriguez, Ruth Roman, Cristina Aguado, Sarah Warren, Carlos Camps, Rafael Rosell, Eloisa Jantus-Lewintre, Miguel-Angel Molina-Vila, Maria González-Cao. A pre-treatment plasma extracellular vesicle-mRNA signature associates with checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis in lung cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 409.

Background: Immunotherapy has changed the paradigm for a fraction of cancer patients. However, the evolution of tumor and immune microenvironment may uncover therapy resistance and immune evasion and its impact on clinical outcome. Here, in order to analyze the genomic and anti-tumor immune evolution, we performed extensive characterization of a dataset of a triple negative breast cancer patient including longitudinal and synchronous metastases (mets) and blood samples, collected over 2,039 days (d) of clinical follow-up. Methods: Multi-platform profiling included whole exome seq, RNAseq, targeted multiplex gene expression, immunohistochemistry, and ELISpot T-cell assay of longitudinal chest wall biopsies (n=17 samples) and peripheral blood (n=14 samples), synchronous multi-regional mets at research autopsy (n=20 mets) and primary tumor analysis. State-of-the-art bioinformatics was applied to the data. Results: Tumor mutation burden (TMB) estimates from the immunotherapy naïve chest wall lesion (M1) (d799) and 20 multi-regional mets (immunotherapy experienced, IE-mets) (d2,033) were 1.5 mut/mb and had median of 3.9 mut/mb, respectively (delta TMB 1.6 mut/mb). There were 73 neoantigens in M1 (subclonal/clonal ratio=0.4), and a median of 226 neoantigens per IE-mets (subclonal/clonal ratio=1.1). TP53 T256fs was validated as a T-cell specific clonal neoantigen and was targeted as liquid biopsy cell-free tumor DNA since cancer diagnosis. Clonal ordering and clonal evolution models for M1 and IE-mets evidenced that clustered mutations shared the same evolutionary history but with a mixed pattern of seeding: metastatic clones were shed by polyclonal and monoclonal seeding. Distinct seeding events occurred from early M1 to late IE-mets, and among late IE-mets (CI 0.95, p< 0.0001). Longitudinal tumor inflammation (IFNy signaling) and antigen presenting machinery (APM) signatures defined immunophenotype statuses (i-inflamed, i-desert, i-excluded). They were modulated over clinical responses towards immune evasion and higher tumor cell proliferation. Immunophenotype statuses were also assigned to IE-mets that showed an overall heterogeneity and significant positive correlation to TMB (p=0.012), but not with the number of predicted neoantigens. M1 had HLA machinery status intact at the genomic level. IE-mets immunophenotyped as i-desert displayed statistically significant HLALOH (p Conclusion: By analysis of metastases genomes, we show that the immune tumor microenvironment shapes triple negative breast cancer progression by promoting and activating immune evasion mechanisms, culminating in heterogeneous lethal cancer. Citation Format: Juan Blanco-Heredia, Carla Anjos Souza, Samuel Gonçalves-Ribeiro, Maria Gonzalez-Cao, Maurizio Callari, Francesc Tresserra, Rafael Rossell, Carlos Caldas, Leticia De Mattos-Arruda. The genomic and anti-tumor immune evolution of breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2174.

Mariacarmela Santarpia,1 Maria Grazia Daffinà,1 Alessandro D’Aveni,1 Grazia Marabello,1 Alessia Liguori,1 Elisa Giovannetti,2–4 Niki Karachaliou,5 Maria Gonzalez Cao,6 Rafael Rosell,7,8 Giuseppe Altavilla1 1Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Human Pathology “G. Barresi”, University of Messina, Messina, Italy; 2Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; 3Department of Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies, CNR-Nano, Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 4Cancer Pharmacology Lab, AIRC Start-Up Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; 5Institute of Oncology Rosell (IOR), University Hospital Sagrat Cor, 6Oncology Department, Institute of Oncology Rosell (IOR), Quirón-Dexeus University Institute, Barcelona, 7Cancer Biology and Precision Medicine Program, Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute, 8Catalan Institute of Oncology, Germans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Badalona, Spain Abstract: The identification of echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has radically changed the treatment of a subset of patients harboring this oncogenic driver. Crizotinib was the first ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor to receive fast approval and is currently indicated as the first-line therapy for advanced, ALK-positive NSCLC patients. However, despite crizotinib’s efficacy, patients almost invariably progress, with the central nervous system being one of the most common sites of relapse. Different mechanisms of acquired resistance have been identified, including secondary ALK mutations, ALK copy number alterations and activation of bypass tracks. Different highly potent and brain-penetrant next-generation ALK inhibitors have been developed and tested in NSCLC patients with ALK rearrangements. Ceritinib, a structurally distinct and selective ALK inhibitor, showed 20 times higher potency than crizotinib in inhibiting ALK and had activity against the most common crizotinib-resistant mutations, including L1196M and G1269A, in preclinical models. In Phase I and II studies, ceritinib demonstrated pronounced activity in both crizotinib-naïve and crizotinib-refractory patients, with responses observed regardless of the presence of ALK resistance mutations. Ceritinib was the first ALK inhibitor to be approved for the treatment of crizotinib-refractory, ALK-rearranged NSCLC, and recent results from a Phase III study have demonstrated superior efficacy compared to standard chemotherapy in the first- and second-line setting. We provide an extensive overview of ceritinib from the design of the compound through preclinical data until efficacy and toxicity results from Phase I–III clinical studies. We review the molecular alterations associated with resistance to ceritinib and highlight the importance of obtaining tumor biopsy at progression to tailor therapy based upon the underlying resistance mechanism. We finally provide an outlook on novel rational therapeutic combinations. Keywords: acquired resistance, anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene, non-small cell lung cancer, ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Introduction: Crizotinib is a first-in-class ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), which has proven its superiority over standard platinum-based chemotherapy for the first-line therapy of ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The development of acquired resistance to crizotinib represents an ongoing challenge with the central nervous system being one of the most common sites of relapse. Ceritinib and alectinib are approved second-generation ALK TKIs. Several novel ALK inhibitors, more potent and with different selectivity compared to crizotinib, are currently in development.Areas covered: This review will focus on new ALK inhibitors, currently in phase 1 or 2 clinical studies. We will also comment on the mechanisms of resistance to ALK inhibition and the strategies to delay or overcome resistance.Expert opinion: The therapeutic management of ALK-rearranged NSCLC has been greatly improved. Next-generation ALK inhibitors have shown differential potency against ALK rearrangements and ALK resistance mutations. The molecular profile of the tumor at the time of disease progression to crizotinib is crucial for the sequencing of novel ALK TKIs. Ongoing clinical studies will address key issues, including the optimal therapeutic algorithm and whether combinational approaches are more effective than single ALK inhibition for the outcome of ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients.

Background: When tumour tissue is unavailable, cell-free DNA (cfDNA)can serve as a surrogate for genetic analyses. Because mutated alleles in cfDNA are usually below 1%, next-generation sequencing (NGS)must be narrowed to target only clinically relevant genes. In this proof-of-concept study, we developed a panel to use in ultra-deep sequencing to identify such mutations in cfDNA. Methods: Our panel (‘SiRe') covers 568 mutations in six genes (EGFR, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, cKIT and PDGFRα)involved in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), gastrointestinal stromal tumour, colorectal carcinoma and melanoma. We evaluated the panel performance in three steps. First, we analysed its analytical sensitivity on cell line DNA and by using an artificial reference standard with multiple mutations in different genes. Second, we analysed cfDNA from cancer patients at presentation (n=42), treatment response (n=12) and tumour progression (n=11); all patients had paired tumour tissue and cfDNA previously genotyped with a Taqman-derived assay (TDA). Third, we tested blood samples prospectively collected from NSCLC patients (n=79) to assess the performance of SiRe in clinical practice. Results: SiRe had a high analytical performance and a 0.01% lower limit of detection. In the retrospective series, SiRe detected 40 EGFR, 11 KRAS, 1 NRAS and 5 BRAF mutations (96.8% concordance with TDA). In the baseline samples, SiRe had 100% specificity and 79% sensitivity relative to tumour tissue. Finally, in the prospective series, SiRe detected 8.7% (4/46) of EGFR mutations at baseline and 42.9% (9/21) of EGFR p.T790M in patients at tumour progression. Conclusions: SiRe is a feasible NGS panel for cfDNA analysis in clinical practice.