Search

BackgroundAntitumor antibody, or targeted immunotherapy, has revolutionized cancer treatment and markedly improved patient outcomes. A prime example is the monoclonal antibody (mAb) trastuzumab, which targets human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). However, like many targeted immunotherapies, only a subset of patients benefit from trastuzumab long-term. In addition to tumor-intrinsic factors, we hypothesize that host genetics may influence subsequent immune activation.MethodsTo model the human population, we produced F1 crosses of genetically heterogeneous Diversity Outbred (DO) mice with BALB/c mice (DOCF1). Distinct DOCF1 mice were orthotopically implanted with the BALB/c-syngeneic TUBO mammary tumor line, which expresses the HER2 ortholog rat neu. Treatment with anti-neu mAb clone 7.16.4 began once tumors reached ∼200 mm3. Genetic linkage and quantitative trait locus (QTL) effects analyses in R/qtl2 identified loci associated with tumor growth rates. Locus validation was performed with BALB/c F1 crosses with recombinant-inbred Collaborative Cross (CC) strains selected for therapy-associated driver genetics (CCxCF1). The respective roles of natural killer (NK) cells and macrophages were investigated by selective depletion in vivo. Ex vivo macrophage antibody-dependent phagocytosis (ADCP) assays were evaluated by confocal microscopy using 7.16.4-opsonized E2Crimson-expressing TUBO tumor cells.ResultsWe observed a divergent response to anti-tumor antibody therapy in DOCF1 mice. Genetic linkage analysis detected a locus on chromosome 10 that correlates to a robust response to therapy, which was validated in CCxCF1 models. Single-cell RNA sequencing of tumors from responder and non-responder models identified key differences in tumor immune infiltrate composition, particularly within macrophage (Mφ) subsets. This is further supported byex vivoanalysis showing Mφ ADCP capacity correlates toin vivotreatment outcomes in both DOCF1 and CCxCF1 models.ConclusionsHost genetics play a key regulatory role in targeted immunotherapy outcomes, and putative causal genes are identified in murine chromosome 10 which may govern Mφ function during ADCP.

Background: Endocrine therapy (ET) fails to induce a response in one half of patients with hormone receptor (HR)–positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and almost all will eventually become refractory to ET. Circulating tumor cells (CTC) are associated with worse prognosis in patients with MBC, but enumeration alone is insufficient to predict the absolute odds of benefit from any therapy, including ET. We developed a multiparameter CTC-Endocrine Therapy Index (CTC-ETI), which we hypothesize may predict resistance to ET in patients with HR-positive MBC.Methods: The CTC-ETI combines enumeration and CTC expression of four markers: estrogen receptor (ER), B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2), Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2), and Ki67. The CellSearch System and reagents were used to capture CTC and measure protein expression by immunofluorescent staining on CTC.Results: The feasibility of determining CTC-ETI was initially established in vitro and then in a prospective single-institution pilot study in patients with MBC. CTC-ETI was successfully determined in 44 of 50 (88%) patients. Eighteen (41%), 9 (20%), and 17 (39%) patients had low, intermediate, and high CTC-ETI scores, respectively. Interobserver concordance of CTC-ETI determination was from 94% to 95% (Kappa statistic, 0.90–0.91). Inter- and cell-to-cell intrapatient heterogeneity of expression of each of the CTC markers was observed. CTC biomarker expression was discordant from both primary and metastatic tissues.Conclusions: CTC expression of ER, BCL-2, HER2, and Ki67 can be reproducibly measured with high analytical validity using the CellSearch System. The clinical implications of CTC-ETI, and of the heterogeneity of CTC biomarker expression, are being evaluated in an ongoing prospective trial. Clin Cancer Res; 21(11); 2487–98. ©2014 AACR.See related commentary by Mathew et al., p. 2421

Table S1. Antibodies used for CTC and tissue studies. Table S2. Stage 2 stopping rules for the cumulative number of successfully assayed patients. Table S3. A. CTC-Enumeration Points based on CTC Enumeration B. CTC-Bio-Pointsa Footnotes:aOnly aliquots with CTC {greater than or equal to}5/7.5 ml WB evaluated bLow or negative ER expression is weighed more than BCL-2, HER2, and Ki67 due to its fundamental role in endocrine responsiveness. C. Calculation of CTC-ETI Scores. D. CTC-ETI Categories. Footnote: Abbreviations: CTC= circulating tumor cells; ER = estrogen receptor; ET= Endocrine Therapy; MBC = metastatic breast cancer; ET= endocrine therapy. Table S4. CTC-ETI determination in cultured human breast cancer cell lines spiked into normal human blood and evaluated by the CellSearch® system. Table S5. Examples of low, intermediate, and high CTC-ETI from patient samples. A. LOW CTC-ETI Patient # 5 (Primary Tissue: ER 90% positive, HER2 negative by FISH; Metastatic tissue: ER positive, HER2 negative by FISH)* B. INTERMEDIATE CTC-ETI Patient #4 (Primary Tissue: ER {greater than or equal to}95% positive, HER2 0 by IHC; Metastatic tissue: insufficient tissue to evaluate ER and HER2)* C. HIGH CTC-ETI Patient # 3 (Primary Tissue: ER 60% positive, HER2 1+/2+ by IHC; Metastatic tissue: ER 75% positive; HER2 1+ by IHC)* Footnote: *ER and HER2 as per initial clinical laboratory using the laboratory's criteria for positivity or negativity. Table S6.< CTC-ETI for each patient. Footnote: aAF =Analytical Failure (CTCbTF=Technical Failure (Machine failure in at least one of 4 aliquots). Table S7. Concordance between biomarkers in primary and metastatic tissues and CTC. aKappa score for concordance between CTC and tissue biomarker for respective biomarker.

Purpose: Circulating tumor cells (CTC) are prognostic in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We tested whether EpCAM-based capture system (CellSearch) is effective in patients with triple-negative (TN) MBC, and whether CTC apoptosis and clustering enhances the prognostic role of CTC.Experimental Design: CTC enumeration and apoptosis were determined using the CXC CellSearch kit at baseline and days 15 and 29 in blood drawn from TN MBC patients who participated in a prospective randomized phase II trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) with or without tigatuzumab. Association between levels of CTC and patient outcomes was assessed using logistic regression, Kaplan–Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards modeling.Results: Nineteen of 52 (36.5%), 14 of 52 (26.9%), and 13 of 49 (26.5%) patients who were evaluable had elevated CTC (≥5 CTC/7.5 mL whole blood) at baseline and at days 15 and 29, respectively. Patients with elevated versus not elevated CTC at each time point had worse progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0.005, 0.0003, 0.0002, respectively). The odds of clinical benefit response for those who had elevated versus low CTC at baseline and days 15 and 29 were 0.25 (95% CI: 0.08–0.84; P = 0.024), 0.19 (95% CI: 0.05–0.17; P = 0.014), and 0.06 (95% CI: 0.01–0.33; P = 0.001), respectively. There was no apparent prognostic effect comparing CTC apoptosis versus non-apoptosis. Presence of CTC cluster at day 15 and day 29 was associated with shorter PFS.Conclusions: CTC were detected using CellSearch assay in approximately one-third of TN MBC patients. Elevated CTC at baseline and days 15 and 29 were prognostic, and reductions in CTC levels reflected response. Clin Cancer Res; 21(12); 2771–9. ©2015 AACR.See related article by Forero-Torres et al., p. 2722

Supplementary Figure 1-5. Supplementary Figure 1. Example of cluster image using the CellSearch® system. Supplementary Figure 2. REMARK diagram of the 19 patients who had elevated CTC (Group B/C) at baseline that were used to study "CTC-response". Supplementary Figure 3. PFS for TIG-treated patients versus the control group according to baseline CTC levels: CTC

Supplementary Figures. Figure S1. Clinical trial study design. Figure S2. Examples of biomarker staining of cultured human breast cancer cell lines after spike and capture from normal human blood using the CellSearch® system. A semi-quantitative scale was established based on relative expression of each biomarker: negative (0), weak (1+), intermediate (2+), and high (3+). Footnote: *hormone depleted condition. Figure S3. Demonstration of appropriate antibody staining of cultured human breast cancer cells with known positive and negative biomarker expression after spike and capture from normal human blood using the CellSearch® System. A: ER staining for MCF-7 and Sk-Br-3. B: BCL- 2 staining for MCF-7 and Sk-Br-3. C: HER2 staining for Sk-Br-3 and MCF-7. D: Ki-67 staining for MCF-7. Figure S4. Composite "CTC-Bio-Score" for different cell lines. A: Hormone depleted MCF-7 cells (Luminal-type). B: MDA-MB-231 (Basal-like type). C: Sk-Br-3 (HER2 positive). Figure S5. Heterogeneity of ER expression within the cultured MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line. Cells were cultured in hormone depleted media for 48 hours, harvested, and spiked into 7.5 ml of normal human blood. The blood was then processed using CellSearch® and stained for DAPI, CK, CD45, and ER. Examples of strong (2+, 3+), weak (1+), and no staining (0) are displayed. Apparent staining in the bottom panel is due to high gain analysis by the automated fluorescent microscopy, as indicated by very high background. Figure S6. Coefficient of variation of CTC-enumeration by mean CTC count. Figure S7. Heterogeneity between primary tissue and CTC for patient #4. The CTC galleries displayed were selected from over 1,000 images to illustrate CTC-ER heterogeneity.

Supplementary Table 1. Table illustrating the criteria with which a cell was considered viable, or apoptotic either due to positive M-30 staining and/or visual evidence of apoptosis (nucleic condensat). Legend: Y= Yes, N= No

Purpose: Circulating tumor cells (CTC) are prognostic in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We tested whether EpCAM-based capture system (CellSearch) is effective in patients with triple-negative (TN) MBC, and whether CTC apoptosis and clustering enhances the prognostic role of CTC. Experimental Design: CTC enumeration and apoptosis were determined using the CXC CellSearch kit at baseline and days 15 and 29 in blood drawn from TN MBC patients who participated in a prospective randomized phase II trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) with or without tigatuzumab. Association between levels of CTC and patient outcomes was assessed using logistic regression, Kaplan–Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: Nineteen of 52 (36.5%), 14 of 52 (26.9%), and 13 of 49 (26.5%) patients who were evaluable had elevated CTC (≥5 CTC/7.5 mL whole blood) at baseline and at days 15 and 29, respectively. Patients with elevated versus not elevated CTC at each time point had worse progression-free survival (PFS; P = 0.005, 0.0003, 0.0002, respectively). The odds of clinical benefit response for those who had elevated versus low CTC at baseline and days 15 and 29 were 0.25 (95% CI: 0.08–0.84; P = 0.024), 0.19 (95% CI: 0.05–0.17; P = 0.014), and 0.06 (95% CI: 0.01–0.33; P = 0.001), respectively. There was no apparent prognostic effect comparing CTC apoptosis versus non-apoptosis. Presence of CTC cluster at day 15 and day 29 was associated with shorter PFS. Conclusions: CTC were detected using CellSearch assay in approximately one-third of TN MBC patients. Elevated CTC at baseline and days 15 and 29 were prognostic, and reductions in CTC levels reflected response. Clin Cancer Res; 21(12); 2771–9. ©2015 AACR. See related article by Forero-Torres et al., p. 2722

Background: Circulating Tumor cells (CTCs) are prognostic at baseline and first follow-up in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Using the most commonly used assay (CellSearch®), we have previously reported the ability to detect apoptotic vs. non-apoptotic CTCs in patients with MBC. However, there has been concern regarding the performance of the CellSearch® assay in patients with triple negative (TN) MBC. We hypothesized that CellSearch® is an effective assay in patients with TN MBC, and that CTC-apoptosis might further separate prognosis. Therefore, we studied CTCs in patients with TN MBC who participated in a prospective randomized phase II trial testing for activity of tigatuzumab (TIG) in combination with nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PAC) conducted by the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (overall results reported by Forero A., et al, ASCO 2013). Methods: Whole blood (WB) was drawn into a CellSave tube at baseline, day 15, and day 29 and CTC counts were determined using the CXC CellSearch® kit. Apoptosis was characterized by staining with a monoclonal antibody that detects a neo-epitope on fragmented cytokeratin (M-30) and independently by visual inspection (nucleic condensation and/or fragmentation, as well as granular cytokeratin). Association between levels of CTCs and CTC-apoptosis with the overall response rate (ORR) and progression free survival (PFS) at baseline, day 15, and day 29 was assessed using logistic regression, Kaplan Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: Of the 60 patients entered into the trial, 52 were evaluable for CTCs. Of these, 19/52 (36.5%), 14/52 (26.9%), and 13/49 (26.5%) had elevated CTCs (≥5CTC/7.5 ml WB) at baseline, day 15, and day 29, respectively. Patients with elevated CTCs at each time point had worse PFS than patients with low or no CTCs. Hazard rates (HR) at baseline, day 15, and day 29 were 2.38 (95% CI: 1.27-4.45, p = 0.007), 2.87 (95% CI: 1.46-5.66, p = 0.002), and 3.40 (95% CI: 1.68-6.89, p = 0.001), respectively. The odds of overall response for those who had elevated CTCs compared to those who did not at baseline, day 15, and day 29, were 0.25 (95% CI: 0.073-0.81, p = 0.024), 0.18 (95% CI: 0.04-0.67, p = 0.014), and 0.06 (95% CI: 0.01-0.28, p = 0.001), respectively. There was no apparent prognostic effect comparing the degree of CTC-apoptosis vs. non-apoptosis. Conclusions: Similar to observations in other intrinsic subgroups, CTCs were detected in a large fraction of TN MBC patients at baseline using CellSearch® assay, and reductions in CTC levels reflected response. In these homogenously prospectively enrolled TN MBC patients, regardless of treatment, CTCs are prognostic at baseline, day 15, and day 29. It does not appear that analysis of CTC-apoptosis is prognostic. Supported by Susan G. Komen for the Cure, Veridex, LLC, Fashion Footwear Charitable Foundation of New York/QVC Presents Shoes on Sale™ (DFH), Associazione Sandro Pitigliani and by a studentship from FIRC (CP), Triple Negative Breast Cancer Foundation, The AVON Foundation, and The Breast Cancer Research Foundation. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P1-04-01.

Background: Enumeration of circulating tumor cells (CTC) from whole blood permits monitoring of patients with breast carcinoma. Analysis of apoptosis & Bcl-2 expression in CTC might add additional prognostic and predictive information. We estimated the degree of these markers in CTC from patients being treated for metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Eighty-three evaluable patients initiating a new therapy for metastatic breast cancer were enrolled. Whole blood was collected at baseline, at one of three short term time windows (24, 48, or 72 h) after initiating treatment, and at first follow-up (3–5 weeks). CTC were isolated, enumerated, and expression of M30 and Bcl2 was determined using the CellSearch® System. Results: At baseline, window, and 3–5 weeks post-treatment, 41/80 (51%), 40/80 (50%) and 21/75 (28%) patients had ≥5 CTC, respectively. At baseline, the proportion of CTC-apoptosis (M30) was inversely correlated with CTC number, and modestly inversely correlated with CTC-Bcl-2. As expected, higher CTC levels at baseline or first follow-up were associated with worse prognosis. Surprisingly, in patients with elevated CTC, higher levels of CTC-apoptosis were associated with worse prognosis, while higher CTC-Bcl-2 levels correlated with better outcomes. Conclusions: CTC apoptosis and expression of Bcl-2 can be analytically determined in patients with metastatic breast cancer and may have biological and clinical implications. Characterization of CTC for these and other markers could further increase the utility of CTC monitoring patients in clinical investigations of new anti-neoplastic agents.

Introduction: Only ∼ 50% of patients (pts) with estrogen receptor (ER) positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) benefit from endocrine therapy (ET). Currently only clinical judgment can be used to identify pts with endocrine-refractory MBC, who are better palliated with chemotherapy. Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) are reliably enumerated using an automated immunomagnetic system (CellSearch®; Veridex LLC). High CTC levels predict rapid progression in pts with MBC. We have developed a multi-parameter assay, the CTC-Endocrine Therapy Index (CTC-ETI) using CellSearch® that may identify pts with ER positive MBC who are unlikely to benefit from ET and may be better served with chemotherapy. CTC-ETI scores are assigned based on CTC levels coupled with the relative percent and degree of marker positivity on the CTC. We report preliminary results from a pilot single institutional study. Methods: CellSearch® has 4 fluorescence channels. Three distinguish CTC from WBC (DAPI, anti-cytokeratin, anti-CD45). The 4th “empty” channel was used to measure ER, BCL-2, HER-2, and Ki-67 expression with fluorescent-labeled antibodies. These 4 markers reflect sensitivity (ER, BCL-2) or resistance (HER-2, Ki-67) to ET. Forty ml of blood was drawn into 4 CellSave® tubes from pts with progressive MBC. Whole blood from 4 tubes was pooled and divided into 4 different 7.5 ml aliquots of blood, which were processed and characterized for CTC counts and each of the four molecular markers using the CXC CellSearch® kit. Results: 21 pts have been accrued to the feasibility study. One patient was ineligible. Five of 20 pts had low CTC counts ( Conclusions: ER, BCL-2, HER-2, and Ki-67 can be accurately determined on CTC using the 4th channel in the CellSearch® system to calculate CTC-ETI. We predict that lower CTC-ETI scores (low or no CTC, or CTC with high CTC ER and BCL-2 and low CTC HER-2 and Ki-67) could be associated with favorable response to ET. Successful completion of the feasibility study will lead to a prospective trial to determine if high CTC-ETI at baseline predicts resistance and rapid progression on ET in women starting a new endocrine therapy for MBC. Supported by Veridex, LLC, Fashion Footwear Charitable Foundation of New York/QVC Presents Shoes on Sale ™ (DFH), Associazione Sandro Pitigliani and by a studentship from FIRC (CP). Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-07-16.

Fulvestrant is a dose dependent selective estrogen receptor (ER) down-regulator (SERD) used in ER-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Nearly all patients develop resistance. We performed molecular analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTC) to gain insight into fulvestrant resistance. Preclinical studies were performed with cultured breast cancer cells spiked into human blood and analyzed on the CellSearch ® system. Clinical data are limited to a subset of patients with ER-positive MBC from a previously reported pilot trial whose disease was progressing on fulvestrant (N = 7) or aromatase inhibitors (AIs) (N = 10). CTCs were enumerated and phenotyped for ER and B-cell lymphoma (BCL2) using the CellSearch ® CXC kit. In preclinical modeling, tamoxifen and AIs resulted in stabilized ER expression, whereas fulvestrant eliminated it. Five of seven patients progressing on fulvestrant had ≥5CTC/7.5 ml WB. Two of these five, treated with 500 mg/month fulvestrant, had no detectable CTC-expression of ER and BCL2 (an ER regulated gene). Three patients had heterogeneous CTC-ER and BCL2 expression indicating incomplete degradation of the ER target by fulvestrant. Two of these patients received 250 mg/month whereas the third patient received 500 mg/month fulvestrant. Her cancer harbored a mutation (Y537S) in the estrogen receptor alpha gene ( ESR1 ). All seven ER positive patients progressing on AIs had heterogeneous CTC-ER expression. These results suggest heterogeneous mechanisms of resistance to fulvestrant, including insufficient dosage, ESR1 mutation, or conversion to dependence on non-ER pathways. CTC enumeration, phenotyping, and genotyping might identify patients who would benefit from fulvestrant dose escalation versus switching to alternative therapies.

Terminal amine groups of poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimers can be substituted with different functional groups for various applications. In this study, PAMAM derivatives with acetamide, hydroxyl, and carboxyl termini were synthesized from ethylenediamine (EDA) core generation 4 and 5 primary amine-terminated PAMAM dendrimers. The reaction products were purified with dialysis and subsequently characterized by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), capillary electrophoresis (CE), size exclusion chromatography (SEC), matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry, potentiometric titration, 1H NMR, and 13C NMR. PAGE and CE electropherograms provide data regarding the purity, charge distribution, and electrophoretic mobility of the dendrimers and their derivatives. SEC and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry detect the average absolute molar mass and the individual mass fractions, respectively. The combination of SEC with potentiometric titration provides quantitative evidence of the degree of the functional group substitution, while NMR techniques (both 1H NMR and 13C NMR) confirmed the changes in dendrimer surface functionalization. This study provides a general example for the comprehensive characterization of surface-functionalized PAMAM dendrimer nanoparticles. The synthesized dendrimer derivatives hold promise for environmental and medical applications.

Monodisperse dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles (diameter = 3.0 nm) were prepared using G5 poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimer functionalized with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FI) and Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptide as template; in vitro targeting efficacy to integrin receptor expressing cells was confirmed by flow cytometry, confocal microscopy, and ICP-MS.

Introduction: Fulvestrant is a selective estrogen receptor down-regulator (SERD). Recent studies have shown that the efficacy of fulvestrant is dose-related. However, at the higher dose (500 mg/month) most cancers develop resistance and progress. We previously reported expression of several markers, including estrogen receptor (ER) and BCL-2, on breast cancer circulating tumor cells (CTC) using CellSearch®. We now report pilot data showing inter-patient heterogeneity of these markers on CTC in patients with known ER positive breast cancer whose disease is progressing on fulvestrant. Methods: We conducted a pilot trial to determine the analytical validity of measuring expression of markers of endocrine sensitivity (ER, BCL-2) or resistance (HER-2, Ki-67) with fluorescent-labeled antibodies using the CellSearch® system. Patients with ER positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) whose disease was progressing on any type of therapy were eligible after signed informed consent. This report is limited to the subjects who were progressing on fulvestrant. Whole blood (WB) was characterized for CTC counts and each of the four molecular markers using the CXC CellSearch® kit. Results: Of 50 enrolled patients, seven were progressing on fulvestrant. Two patients had no detectable CTC, while five patients had an average of ≥5 CTC/7.5 mL WB. Results are shown in a table below: CTC-ERCTC-BCL-2Patient #Fulvestrant dose (mg/month)Days since last doseN CTC/7.5 mL of WB% of CTC-ER+N CTC/7.5 mL of WB% of CTC-BCL-2+295002880%110%4550028170%170%2250341010%714%850031812%1735%172507728%367% These exploratory data suggest widely different mechanisms of resistance to fulvestrant in different patients with ER positive MBC. In two of the patients (29, 45) treated with 500 mg/month, both CTC-ER and CTC-BCL-2 expression were absent, suggesting no signaling through the ER pathway. We hypothesize either that fulvestrant was actively down-regulating ER, but the cancers had adopted other growth and survival pathways, or that ER negative, hormone-independent clones had evolved. In the other three cases, ER was clearly present with evidence of signaling, based on BCL-2 expression. Two of these patients (2, 17) were on the lower dose of fulvestrant, now considered to be less effective. However, the third (8) was on the higher dose and yet still had evidence of ER signaling. This observation suggests that some patients may benefit from even higher doses of SERD therapy. Conclusions: These pilot results suggest heterogeneous biological or pharmacological mechanisms of resistance to SERD therapy. These data suggest that CTC-ER and CTC-BCL-2 expression could serve as pharmacodynamic monitoring tools for dose escalation of fulvestrant or other SERDs. Further molecular analysis might provide biological bases for resistance to fulvestrant. Supported by Veridex, LLC, Fashion Footwear Charitable Foundation of New York/QVC Presents Shoes on Sale™ (DFH), Associazione Sandro Pitigliani and by a studentship from FIRC (CP). Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr PD6-4.

1system were stored in which CTC were identified by an automated algorithm. Furthermore, this algorithm determined the Her-2 positivity threshold in each sample, using the fluorescence of leukocytes within each sample as internal control. Results: This automated Her-2 assessment method successfully distinguished Her-2 positive from Her-2 negative breast cancer cell lines. We report here for the first time that Her-2 expression of CTC varied greatly between but also within patients, suggesting a possible mechanism of treatment resistance. However, in M1 patients, a threshold of 75% of Her-2 positive CTC in patients with ≥5 CTC showed a relatively low discrepancy rate between the primary tumor and CTC Her-2 status. Applying this threshold, ∼2% of M1 patients with Her-2 negative primary tumors had Her-2 positive CTC status and ∼30% of M1 patients with Her-2 positive primary tumors had Her-2 negative CTC status. Interestingly, no Her-2 discrepancy was observed between CTC and primary tumors in M0 patients. Conclusions: Our results suggest that Her-2 status shift appears mostly at metastatic relapse, and consists generally in Her-2 low expression on CTC isolated from M1 patients with Her-2 positive primary tumors. These findings also demonstrate the feasibility of real-time quantitative and reproducible assessment of treatment targets on CTC, opening a path towards personalized treatment. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Introduction Only ∼50% of patients (pts) with estrogen receptor (ER) positive (+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) benefit from endocrine therapy (ET). Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) are reliably enumerated using CellSearch (Veridex, LLC). High CTC levels predict rapid progression in pts with MBC. We have developed a multi-parameter assay, the CTC-Endocrine Therapy Index (CTC-ETI) using CellSearch that may identify pts with ER+ MBC who are unlikely to benefit from ET and may be better served with chemotherapy. CTC-ETI scoring is based on CTC levels coupled with the relative percent and degree of marker positivity on CTC. We report preliminary results from a feasibility study. Methods CellSearch has 4 fluorescence channels: 3 distinguish CTC from WBC and the 4th “empty” channel was used to measure ER, BCL-2, HER-2, and Ki-67 expression with fluorescent-labeled antibodies. These 4 markers reflect sensitivity (ER, BCL-2) or resistance (HER-2, Ki-67) to ET. Blood from pts with progressive MBC was processed and characterized for CTC counts and each of the 4 markers using the CXC CellSearch kit. Results 34 pts have been accrued. One was ineligible. Ten of 33 pts had low CTC counts ( Conclusions CTC-ETI can be determined in MBC pts using the 4th channel in the CellSearch system. We predict that lower CTC-ETI scores (low or no CTC, or CTC with high CTC ER and BCL-2 and low CTC HER-2 and Ki-67) could be associated with favorable response to ET. Successful completion of the feasibility study will lead to a prospective trial to determine if high CTC-ETI at baseline predicts resistance and rapid progression on ET in pts starting new ET for MBC. Supported by Veridex, LLC, Fashion Footwear Charitable Foundation of New York/QVC Presents Shoes on Sale™ (DFH), Associazione Sandro Pitigliani and by a studentship from FIRC (CP). Disclosure M.C. Connelly: I am an employee of Veridex, LLC. D.A. Chianese: I am employed by Johnson and Johnson who in part funded this research. I am in addition, a shareholder of Johnson and Johnson. D.F. Hayes: I receive research support for laboratory and clinical research from Veridex LLC. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Introduction. CTC can be reproducibly and reliably enumerated using a commercially-available, automated immunomagnetic system (CellSearch®; Veridex LLC). High levels of CTC predict rapid progression in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Only ∼ 50% of patients with estrogen receptor (ER) positive MBC benefit from endocrine therapy (ET). Patients with endocrine-refractory MBC are better palliated with chemotherapy. We have developed a multi-parameter assay using CellSearch® that may identify patients with ER positive MBC who are unlikely to benefit from ET and may be better served with chemotherapy. Methods. CellSearch® has four fluorescence channels. Three of these are used to distinguish CTC from WBC (DAPI, anti-cytokeratin, anti-CD45). The 4th “empty” channel was used to measure ER, Bcl-2, HER2, and Ki67 expression with antigen-specific fluorescent-labeled antibodies. These four markers were chosen because of their associations with sensitivity (ER, Bcl-2) or resistance (HER2, Ki-67) to ET. Cultured human breast cancer cells (MCF-7: ER +, BCL-2 +, HER2 -, Ki67 +; MDA-MB-231: ER -, Bcl-2 -, HER2 -, Ki67 +; BT-474: ER +, Bcl-2 +, HER2 +, Ki67 +) were spiked into 7.5 ml human whole blood from normal donors and separated and characterized using the CXC CellSearch® kit. Results. Each cell line stained appropriately for the respective markers, with appropriate negative controls, although staining was heterogeneous, even within a single cell line. Using these preliminary data, we have developed a CTC-ETI in which scores are assigned to the individual categories consisting of cell counts coupled with the relative percent and degree of cell positivity of each marker. We predict that lower scores (low or no CTC, or CTC with high % and intensity of ER and Bcl-2; low HER2 and Ki-67) will be associated with favorable response to ET. Conclusions. CellSearch® can be used to measure the expression of 4 clinically useful and proven breast cancer biomarkers. A clinical trial is underway at U. Michigan to permit calculation of CTC-ETI in patients with MBC, which will lead to a prospective trial to determine if high CTC-ETI predicts resistance and rapid progression on ET. Supported by Veridex, LLC, Fashion Footwear Charitable Foundation of New York/QVC Presents Shoes on Sale ™ (DFH), Associazione Sandro Pitigliani and by a studentship from FIRC (CP) Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4154. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4154