1. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists compared with basal insulins for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Author
-
Juliette Thompson, Sonal Singh, Maria B. Yu, Ellen E. Korol, Rattan Juneja, Iqra A. Syed, Nathalie Waser, Eugene E. Wright, and Anita Y. M. Kwan
- Subjects
Blood Glucose ,Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism ,Glucagon-Like Peptides ,Insulin Glargine ,Type 2 diabetes ,Pharmacology ,Basal (phylogenetics) ,0302 clinical medicine ,Endocrinology ,systematic review ,Insulin Detemir ,Insulin ,GLP‐1 RAs ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Insulin detemir ,Insulin, Long-Acting ,glycaemic control ,Original Article ,type 2 diabetes ,medicine.drug ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Recombinant Fusion Proteins ,030209 endocrinology & metabolism ,Hypoglycemia ,Incretins ,Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor ,03 medical and health sciences ,Internal medicine ,Internal Medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Hypoglycemic Agents ,basal insulin ,Glycated Hemoglobin ,Venoms ,Liraglutide ,Insulin glargine ,business.industry ,Original Articles ,medicine.disease ,Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments ,Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 ,meta‐analysis ,Exenatide ,Dulaglutide ,Peptides ,business - Abstract
Aims Since 2005, several glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have been approved to treat people with type 2 diabetes. These agents are considered for use at the same point in the treatment paradigm as basal insulins. A comprehensive comparison of these drug classes, therefore, can help inform treatment decisions. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of GLP-1 RAs compared with basal insulins. Materials and methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and PubMed databases were searched. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of ≥16 weeks’ duration comparing GLP-1 RAs versus basal insulins in adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antihyperglycemic drugs were included. Data were extracted on the change from baseline to 26 weeks (±10 weeks) of treatment in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and weight, as well as the proportion of patients experiencing hypoglycemia. Fixed-effect pairwise meta-analyses were conducted where data were available from ≥ two studies. Results Fifteen RCTs were identified and 11 meta-analysed. The once-weekly GLP-1 RAs, exenatide long acting release (LAR) and dulaglutide, led to greater, statistically significant mean HbA1c reductions versus basal insulins (exenatide: -0.31% [95% confidence interval -0.42, -0.19], dulaglutide: -0.39% [-0.49, -0.29]) whilst once-daily liraglutide and twice-daily exenatide did not (liraglutide: 0.06% [-0.06, 0.18], exenatide: 0.01% [-0.11, 0.13]). Mean weight reduction was seen with all GLP-1 RAs while mean weight gain was seen with basal insulins Interpretation of the analysis of hypoglycemia was limited by inconsistent definitions and reporting. Due to the limited number of available studies sensitivity analyses to explore heterogeneity could not be conducted. Conclusions Although weight reduction is seen with all GLP-1RA’s, only the once weekly agents, exenatide LAR and dulaglutide, demonstrate significant HbA1c reductions when compared to basal insulins.
- Published
- 2016