Search

The Hippo pathway and its two key effectors, Yes-associated protein (YAP) and transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ), are consistently altered in breast cancer. Pivotal regulators of cell metabolism such as the AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), Stearoyl-CoA-desaturase 1 (SCD1), and HMG-CoA reductase (HMGCR) are relevant modulators of TAZ/YAP activity. In this prospective study, we measured the tumor expression of TAZ, YAP, AMPK, SCD1, and HMGCR by immunohistochemistry in 65 Her2+ breast cancer patients who underwent trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant treatment. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the immunohistochemical expression of the Hippo pathway transducers and cell metabolism regulators on pathological complete response. Low expression of cytoplasmic TAZ, both alone and in the context of a composite signature identified by machine learning including also low nuclear levels of YAP and HMGCR and high cytoplasmic levels of SCD1, was a predictor of residual disease in the univariate logistic regression. This finding was not confirmed in the multivariate model including estrogen receptor > 70% and body mass index > 20. However, our findings were concordant with overall survival data from the TCGA cohort. Our results, possibly affected by the relatively small sample size of this study population, deserve further investigation in adequately sized, ad hoc prospective studies.

Background: Several randomized clinical trials clearly demonstrated that adding palbociclib (P) to endocrine therapies (ET), such as letrozole (LT) or fulvestrant (FLV), significantly improves outcome both in first-line/endocrine sensitive and second-line/endocrine resistant hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients (pts). The aims of the present study were to assess efficacy, activity and toxicity of P combined with either LT or FLV in a real world setting, and to study the efficacy and activity of treatments administered after progression to P + ET. Methods: Records of 245 consecutive HR+/HER2- MBC patients from 14 Italian cancer centers were reviewed in this observational study. Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS) obtained with P+ET; secondary end-points were overall response rates (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) obtained with P+ET and with post-progression treatments, as well as overall survival (OS), PFS to subsequent treatment lines and post-progression survival (PPS). Results: Overall 245 pts were treated with P+ET from April 2014. Of them, 116 (47%) received it in first-line setting, 70 (28%) in second-line and the rest (68 pts, 25%) in subsequent lines. Median age was 60 (35-80) years and median ECOG performance status was 0. Seventy-three pts (30%) had more than two metastatic sites and 75 (31%) had visceral metastasis. Ninenty-one (37%) pts received P+LT and 92 (37%) were treated with P+FLV. For 15 (6%) premenopausal pts an LHRH analogue was added to P+ET. In 77 (41%) patients a biopsy of a metastatic lesion was performed. Among the 116 pts treated in first-line setting, median PFS was 14.7 (95% CI 12.0-17.3) and 15.1 (95%CI 8.6-21.6) months for pts receiving P+LT and P+FLV, respectively. ORR was 48% (95% CI: 39-57%) and CBR was 75% (95% CI, 66-82%). Four (3%) complete responses (CR), 52 (45%) partial responses (PR), 31 (27%) stable disease (SD) and 11 (9%) progression disease (PD) were observed as best response; 18 pts were not yet evaluable. Among the 70 pts treated in second-line setting, median PFS was 10.8 (95%CI 0-24.3) and 7.9 (95%CI 3.3-12.5) months, for pts receiving P+LT and P+FLV, respectively. The ORR was 26% (95% CI: 16-38) and the CBR was 66% (95% CI, 53-76). One CR (1%), 17 PR (24%), 28 SD (40%) and 13 PD (18.5%) were observed as best response, while 9 were not yet evaluable. Best response was achieved after a median of 5 cycle. At time of the current analysis, 50 pts experienced PD during P+ET. Of them, 38 (76%) received chemotherapy (capecitabine, eribulin, nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel+bevacizumab, vinoreline) and 12 (24%) ET. To date, only 5 pts progressed during these therapies, preventing us for evaluating secondary end-points regarding efficacy and activity. The most frequent adverse event (AE) was grade 3-4 neutropenia (31%), with febrile neutropenia reported in 5 (2%) cases. Main non-hematological AEs were fatigue and gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea and stypsis). Conclusions: Our findings confirm the efficacy and safety of P+ET as first/second-line treatment for HR+/HER2- MBC pts, even in a non-selected, real world population. Since data regarding the efficacy and activity of post-progression therapies were not mature at the time of the current analysis, they will be subsequently presented. Citation Format: Alessandra Fabi, Michelangelo Russillo, Mariangela Ciccarese, Simone Scagnoli, Francesco Schettini, Giuseppe Buono, Vito Lo Russo, Grazia Arpino, Rosalba Rossella, Giuseppina Sarobba, Marianna Giampaglia, Patrizia Pellegrini, Simonetta Stani, Michela Palleschi, Vincenzo Adamo, Francesca Morelli, Maria Agnese Fabbri, Cecilia Nistico, Gianluigi Ferretti, Giovanna Catania, Simona Pisegna, Diana Giannarelli, Francesco Cognetti. Real-world evidence of efficacy and activity of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy and post-progression treatments in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients: The PALPract study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-11-18.

Background: The evolution of therapeutic landscape of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC) has led to an unprecedented outcome improvement, even if the optimal sequence strategy is still debated. To address this issue and to provide a picture of the advancement of anti-HER2 treatments, we performed a large, multicenter, retrospective study of HER2-positive BC patients. Methods: The observational PANHER study included 1,328 HER2-positive advanced BC patients treated with HER2 blocking agents since June 2000 throughout July 2020. Endpoints of efficacy were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Patients who received a first-line pertuzumab-based regimen showed better PFS ( p < 0.0001) and OS ( p = 0.004) than those receiving other treatments. Median PFS and mOS from second-line starting were 8 and 28 months, without significant differences among various regimens. Pertuzumab-pretreated patients showed a mPFS and a mOS from second-line starting not significantly affected by type of second line, that is, T-DM1 or lapatinib/capecitabine ( p = 0.80 and p = 0.45, respectively). Conversely, pertuzumab-naïve patients receiving second-line T-DM1 showed a significantly higher mPFS compared with that of patients treated with lapatinib/capecitabine ( p = 0.004). Median OS from metastatic disease diagnosis was higher in patients treated with trastuzumab-based first line followed by second-line T-DM1 in comparison to pertuzumab-based first-line and second-line T-DM1 ( p = 0.003), although these data might be partially influenced by more favorable prognostic characteristics of patients in the pre-pertuzumab era. No significant differences emerged when comparing patients treated with ‘old’ or ‘new’ drugs ( p = 0.43), even though differences in the length of the follow-up between the two cohorts should be taken into account. Conclusion: Our results confirmed a relevant impact of first-line pertuzumab-based treatment and showed lower efficacy of second-line T-DM1 in trastuzumab/pertuzumab pretreated, as compared with pertuzumab-naïve patients. Our findings may help delineate a more appropriate therapeutic strategy in HER2-positive metastatic BC. Prospective randomized trials addressing this topic are awaited.

Clinicopathological prognostic features have limited value to identify with precision newly diagnosed patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (BC), who would benefit from chemotherapy (CT) in addition to adjuvant hormonal therapy (HT). The 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® (RS) assay has been demonstrated to predict CT benefit, hence supporting personalized decisions on adjuvant CT. The multicenter, prospective, observational study PONDx investigated the real-life use of RS® results in Italy and its impact on treatment decisions. Physicians’ treatment recommendations (HT ± CT) were documented before and after availability of RS results, and changes in recommendations were determined. In the HR+ HER2− early BC population studied (N = 1738), physicians recommended CT + HT in 49% of patients pre-RS. RS-guided treatment decisions resulted in 36% reduction of CT recommendations. PONDx confirms that RS results provide clinically relevant information for CT recommendation in early-stage BC, resulting in a reduction of more than a third of CT use.

Breast cancer (BC) heterogeneity is composite in nature, with a wide variety of factors concurring to define several pathological entities, which differ by clinical presentation, pathologic features, therapy administered, and inherent outcomes1. Additional sources of breast cancer heterogeneity may raise during the disease course. In BC patients whose disease was initially diagnosed in the early stage and subsequently progressed with metastatic involvement of one single or multiple site/s, the molecular characteristics of metastatic lesions do not necessary mimic those of the disease initially diagnosed. A well-depicted molecular landscape is crucial for subtype definition, prognostic evaluation and appropriate therapeutic decisions. Accordingly, current guidelines suggest repeating the immunohistochemical (IHC) assessment in patients with metastatic spread and at least one secondary lesion amenable to biopsy2. Discordance in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status between the tumor and metastatic lesions is widely acknowledged, and not yet completely unraveled in their biologic meaning and prognostic relevance3–11. The overexpression of HER2 or amplification of the related gene is extensively recognized as a feature associated with more aggressive biological behavior12,13. However, the extent to which changes in HER2 status may affect patients’ prognosis is still a matter of debate14. We herein propose an observational study of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients treated with the anti-HER2 targeted agents pertuzumab and/or trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1). Our research question is whether relevant differences exist in long-term outcomes of patients with concordant HER2 status between the primary tumor and its secondary lesion/s compared to patients whose disease revealed HER2-positivity gain at the IHC assessment of metastatic lesions. In our historical cohorts, we also sought to identify factors associated with HER2-positivity gain at the IHC reassessment, for which an impact on prognosis may be foreseen.

Pemetrexed maintenance significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients not progressing after induction chemotherapy.This study is aimed at examine the association of various clinical factor and survival in a real-world cohort analysis.One hundred ninety-four patients were included and classified as "PM" cohort ("Pemetrexed Maintenance", including patients given with pemetrexed maintenance after induction chemotherapy, n=112), and "noPM" cohort ("no Pemetrexed Maintenance" including those discontinuing pemetrexed, n=82).The median PFS was 8.8 and 5.4 months in the PM and noPM cohorts, respectively (p=0.001). The median OS was 19.6 months in the "PM" cohort and 13.2 months in the "noPM" cohort (p0.02). In the multivariate analysis, ECOG Performance Status (PS) 0 and maintenance therapy were independently associated with improved PFS and OS. A longer median PFS was reported in patients given ≥5 cycles of pemetrexed maintenance (p0.01).These results further confirm the survival benefit of pemetrexed maintenance in a real-word population. All eligible advanced NSCLC patients should be strongly considered for at least 5 of pemetrexed maintenance.

BackgroundHER2-targeting agents have dramatically changed the therapeutic landscape of HER2+ advanced breast cancer (ABC). Within a short time frame, the rapid introduction of new therapeutics has led to the approval of pertuzumab combined with trastuzumab and a taxane in first-line, and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in second-line. Thereby, evidence of T-DM1 efficacy following trastuzumab/pertuzumab combination is limited, with data from some retrospective reports suggesting lower activity. The purpose of the present study is to investigate T-DM1 efficacy in pertuzumab-pretreated and pertuzumab naïve HER2 positive ABC patients. We also aimed to provide evidence on the exposure to different drugs sequences including pertuzumab and T-DM1 in HER2 positive cell lines.MethodsThe biology of HER2 was investigated in vitro through sequential exposure of resistant HER2 + breast cancer cell lines to trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and their combination. In vitro experiments were paralleled by the analysis of data from 555 HER2 + ABC patients treated with T-DM1 and evaluation of T-DM1 efficacy in the 371 patients who received it in second line. Survival estimates were graphically displayed in Kaplan Meier curves, compared by log rank test and, when possibile, confirmed in multivariate models.ResultsWe herein show evidence of lower activity of T-DM1 in two HER2+ breast cancer cell lines resistant to trastuzumab+pertuzumab, as compared to trastuzumab-resistant cells. Lower T-DM1 efficacy was associated with a marked reduction of HER2 expression on the cell membrane and its nuclear translocation. HER2 downregulation at the membrane level was confirmed in biopsies of four trastuzumab/pertuzumab-pretreated patients.Among the 371 patients treated with second-line T-DM1, median overall survival (mOS) from diagnosis of advanced disease and median progression-free survival to second-line treatment (mPFS2) were 52 and 6 months in 177 patients who received trastuzumab/pertuzumab in first-line, and 74 and 10 months in 194 pertuzumab-naïve patients (p = 0.0006 and 0.03 for OS and PFS2, respectively).ConclusionsOur data support the hypothesis that the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab reduces the amount of available plasma membrane HER2 receptor, limiting the binding of T-DM1 in cancer cells. This may help interpret the less favorable outcomes of second-line T-DM1 in trastuzumab/pertuzumab pre-treated patients compared to their pertuzumab-naïve counterpart.

While the emotional response of healthcare providers during the COVID-19 pandemic has been extensively investigated in countries in the Far-East, little is known about the psychological impact and the associated emotional distress of healthcare providers in Italy, especially with regard to different regions. The aim of the &ldquo, VIRARE&rdquo, survey, which was addressed to all the healthcare providers in the Lazio region (central Italy) and, in particular, to those working in the oncology field, is to analyze their opinion on the impact and management of the pandemic, to better understand the level of their psychological distress. A global good psychological response of healthcare providers to the pandemic has emerged, independently from their different occupations in the oncology field. Healthcare providers show a high degree of resilience, identifying the major causes of distress the difficulty of the management of this situation, the obstacles in their working activity and expressing a high degree of dissatisfaction with how Italian institutions handled this situation. This survey also provides a direct comparison between COVID-19-infected (or directly in contact with COVID-19-infected patients) and uninfected healthcare providers, identifying the sub-category of infected professionals that reported signs of depression as particularly vulnerable.

Background: ErbB2-targeting agents have dramatically changed the therapeutic landscape of ErbB2+ advanced breast cancer (ABC). However, their optimal sequence of administration deserves further investigation.Methods: The biology of ErbB2 was investigated through sequential treatments in vitro, in ErbB2+ breast cancer cell lines resistant to trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and their combination. We analyzed data from 555 ErbB2+ ABC patients treated with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and explored the efficacy of T-DM1 in the 371 patients who received it in second-line. Survival estimates were graphically displayed in Kaplan Meier curves, compared by log rank test and, when possibile, confirmed in multivariate models.Results: We show here lower activity of T-DM1 in two HER2+ breast cancer cell lines resistant to trastuzumab+pertuzumab, as compared to trastuzumab-resistant cells. Reduced T-DM1 efficacy is associated with a marked reduction of HER2 expression on the cell membrane and its nuclear translocation. Membrane-HER2 downregulation was confirmed in biopsies of four trastuzumab/pertuzumab-pretreated patients. Among 371 patients treated with second-line T-DM1, median overall survival (mOS) from diagnosis and median progression-free survival to second-line treatment (mPFS2) were 52 and 6 months in 177 patients who received trastuzumab/pertuzumab in first-line, and 74 and 10 months in 194 pertuzumab-naïve patients (p=0.0006 and 0.03 for OS and PFS2, respectively). Conclusions: Our data support the hypothesis that the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab reduces the amount of available plasma membrane HER2 receptor, limiting the binding of T-DM1 to cancer cells. This may help interpret the less favorable outcomes of second-line T-DM1 in trastuzumab/pertuzumab pre-treated patients compared to their pertuzumab-naïve counterpart.

We analyzed data from 738 HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer (mbc) patients treated with pertuzumab‐based regimens and/or T‐DM1 at 45 Italian centers. Outcomes were explored in relation to tumor subtype assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The median progression‐free survival at first‐line (mPFS1) was 12 months. Pertuzumab as first‐line conferred longer mPFS1 compared to other first‐line treatments (16 vs. 9 months, p = 0.0001), regardless of IHC subtype. Median PFS in second‐line (mPFS2) was 7 months, with no difference by IHC subtype, but it was more favorable with T‐DM1 compared to other agents (7 vs. 6 months, p = 0.03). There was no PFS2 gain in patients with tumors expressing both hormonal receptors (HRs; p = 0.17), while a trend emerged for tumors with one HR (p = 0.05). Conversely, PFS2 gain was significant in HRs‐negative tumors (p = 0.04). Median overall survival (mOS) was 74 months, with no significant differences by IHC subtypes. Survival rates at 2 and 3 years in patients treated with T‐DM1 in second‐line after pertuzumab were significantly lower compared to pertuzumab‐naïve patients (p = 0.01). When analyzed by IHC subtype, the outcome was confirmed if both HRs or no HRs were expressed (p = 0.02 and p = 0.006, respectively). Our results confirm that HRs expression impacts the clinical behavior and novel treatment‐related outcomes of HER2‐positive tumors when treatment sequences are considered. Moreover, multivariate analysis showed that HRs expression had no effect on PFS and OS. Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings and clarify the interplay between HER2 and estrogen receptor pathways in HER2‐positive (mbc) patients., What's new? About half of breast cancers positive for human epidermal growth factor (HER2) also express hormone receptors but the impact of hormone receptor status on the success of HER2‐directed treatments is not fully explored. Here the authors retrospectively assessed tumor behavior and treatment outcomes in 738 women with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer treated with new generation anti‐HER2 agents. Distinct hormone receptor expression patterns significantly affected the progression free and overall survival, justifying further studies to define optimal treatment regimens and the interplay between hormone receptor and HER2 signaling.

We carried out a retrospective observational study of 264 HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients to explore the efficacy of first-line treatment with pertuzumab/trastuzumab/taxane in real-world setting. Survival data were analyzed by Kaplan Meier curves and log rank test. Median follow-up, length of pertuzumab/trastuzumab/taxane treatment and of pertuzumab, trastuzumab maintenance were 21, 4 and 15 months, respectively. The response rate was 77.3%, and the clinical benefit rate 93.6%. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 21 months, and median overall survival (mOS) was not reached. When comparing patients by trastuzumab-pretreatment, similar PFS were observed, although a longer OS was reached in trastuzumab-naïve patients (p = 0.02). Brain metastases at baseline and their development in course of therapy were associated with significantly shorter PFS (p = 0.0006) and shorter OS, although at a not fully statistically relevant extent (p = 0.06). The addition of maintenance endocrine therapy (ET) to pertuzumab/trastuzumab maintenance was associated with longer PFS (p = 0.0001), although no significant differences were detected in OS (p = 0.31). Results were confirmed by propensity score analysis (p = 0.003 and p = 0.46, respectively). In multivariate models, longer PFS was related to lower Performance Status (PS) (p = 0.07), metastatic stage at diagnosis (p = 0.006) and single metastatic site (p

Aim: Quality of life (QoL) is a critical issue for women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Eribulin mesylate represents a novel and active drug for pretreated MBC. Regretfully, few data exploring health-related (HR) QoL are available in unselected populations. Patients & methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in 50 MBC patients treated with eribulin mesylate, in order to evaluate HRQoL and patients’ well-being by using the Edmonton symptoms assessment scale (ESAS) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast questionnaires. Results: A significant ESAS score improvement was observed with a 10% median decrease. No differences were revealed for the QoL scores. Conclusion: The analysis of ESAS and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scores showed that eribulin mesylate contributes to preserve QoL in MBC patients.

Currently there are no reliable biomarkers to predict outcome of exemestane treatment. We designed a prospective study to investigate whether constitutive genetic background might affect response to therapy. In a population of 302 advanced breast cancer patients treated with exemestane we showed that a 5-polymorphism-based genetic score could be used to identify patients with different risks of progression and death.Introduction: Approximately 50% of locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients treated with first-line exemestane do not show objective response and currently there are no reliable biomarkers to predict the outcome of patients using this therapy. The constitutive genetic background might be responsible for differences in the outcome of exemestane-treated patients. We designed a prospective study to investigate the role of germ line polymorphisms as biomarkers of survival. Patients and Methods: Three hundred two locally advanced or MBC patients treated with first-line exemestane were genotyped for 74 germ line polymorphisms in 39 candidate genes involved in drug activity, hormone balance, DNA replication and repair, and cell signaling pathways. Associations with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were tested with multivariate Cox regression. Bootstrap resampling was used as an internal assessment of results reproducibility. Results: Cytochrome P450 19A1-rs10046TC/CC, solute carrier organic anion transporter 1B1-rs4149056TT, adenosine triphosphate binding cassette subfamily G member 2-rs2046134GG, fibroblast growth factor receptor-4-rs351855TT, and X-ray repair cross complementing 3-rs861539TT were significantly associated with PFS and then combined into a risk score (0-1, 2, 3, or 4-6 risk points). Patients with the highest risk score (4-6 risk points) compared with ones with the lowest score (0-1 risk points) had a median PFS of 10 months versus 26.3 months (adjusted hazard ratio [AdjHR], 3.12 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.18-4.48]; P < .001) and a median OS of 38.9 months versus 63.0 months (AdjHR, 2.41 [95% CI, 1.22-4.79], P = .012), respectively. Conclusion: In this study we defined a score including 5 polymorphisms to stratify patients for PFS and OS. This score, if validated, might be translated to personalize locally advanced or MBC patient treatment and management.

Background In HER2+ breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) the pathological complete response (pCR) is associated with improved survival. With regimens based on the combination of trastuzumab (T), pertuzumab (P) and chemotherapy, pCR rates are slightly over 48%. We conducted a retrospective analysis on HER2+ BC pts to describe the outcomes of neoadjuvant combination of P+T and chemotherapy in the real-life setting. Methods Our cohort included 64 pts treated between Sept 2015 and Mar 2018 in 15 Italian Cancer Centers. Treatment outcomes were analyzed in terms of pCR (defined as ypT0/Tis, ypN0i-) and toxicities, recorded according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Statistical analysis was performed with T di Student test and χ2 test. Results Overall, in the 55 evaluable pts median age was 50 (range 28-77) and 29 pts (53%) were pre-menopausal. 24 pts (45%) were ER-/PgR-, 12 (21%) ER+/PgR-, 16 (29%) ER+/PgR+, median ki67 was 40. 9% of pts were cT1, 73% cT2, 13% cT3 and 5% cT4; 42 pts (76%) were cN+. All pts received 4 cycles of T (8 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) and P (loading dose 840 mg, followed by 420 mg every 3 weeks). In 42 pts T+P were administered with docetaxel (75 mg/mq every 3 weeks), in 8 pts with paclitaxel (80 mg/mq) and 5 pts received docetaxel and carboplatin (AUC5). In 13 pts also 3 cycles of anthracyclines, according to the FEC scheme, were administered. A pCR was achieved in 29 pts (53%). No significant associations were found between pCR and baseline characteristics or treatments schedule. Seven out of 55 (13%) pts reported G3-G4 toxicities (5 pts neutropenia G3-G4, 1 pt vomiting G3, 1 pt diarrhoea G3, 1 pt anemia G3). Three out of 4 pts treated with docetaxel, carboplatin and P+T reported G3/G4 toxicities. A significant association was found between chemotherapy schedule and toxicities (p = 0.004). Conclusions The association of P+T+chemotherapy improved pCR rate in HER2+ BC pts treated in the real-life setting. Our results showed that the selection of chemotherapy that will be associated with the dual blockade of HER2 is of paramount importance in order to avoid severe toxicities and increase the compliance with treatment. Legal entity responsible for the study Department of Oncology, Belcolle Hospital. Funding Has not received any funding. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Purpose The everolimus and exemestane combination represents a treatment option for the endocrine sensitive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. The toxicity profile reported in the Bolero 2 trial showed the feasibility in the selected patients. Few data are available for the unselected population. Methods In order to evaluate the safety in the unselected population of the clinical practice and to evaluate a possible association of toxicities with previous treatments, clinical data from 181 consecutive patients were retrospectively collected. Results Due to toxic events, everolimus dosage was reduced to 5 mg in 27% of patients. No association was found in the analysis between toxicity and number of prior therapies, neither between toxicity and response. In the multivariate analysis the previous exposure to anthracyclines for advanced disease represents the only predictive factor of developing grade ≥2 toxicity (OR = 2.85 CI 95% 1.07–7.59, p = 0.036). Conclusions The association of everolimus and exemestane has confirmed to be a safe and effective treatment for endocrine sensitive MBC patients even in routine clinical practice. The rate of treatment discontinuation due to toxicity is low and none association between previous number of treatments and response or between toxicity and response was found.

The evidence emerged from the TOURANDOT trial encourages evaluating the role of anthropometric determinants on treatment outcomes in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients treated with bevacizumab-including regimens. We thus analyzed data from a subgroup of these patients from a larger cohort previously assessed for treatment outcomes. Patients were included in the present analysis if body mass index values had been recorded at baseline. Clinical benefit rates, progression free survival and overall survival were assessed for the overall study population and subgroups defined upon molecular subtype. One hundred ninety six patients were included (N:196). Body mass index showed no impact on clinical benefit rates in the overall study sample and in the luminal cancer subset (p = 0.12 and p = 0.79, respectively), but did so in the triple negative subgroup, with higher rates in patients with body mass index ≥25 (p = 0.03). In the overall study sample, body mass index did no impact progression free or overall survival (p = 0.33 and p = 0.67, respectively). Conversely, in triple negative patients, progression free survival was significantly longer with body mass index ≥25 (6 vs 14 months, p = 0.04). In this subset, overall survival was more favorable (25 vs 19 months, p = 0.02). The impact of the molecular subtype was confirmed in multivariate models including the length of progression free survival, and number of metastatic sites (p < 0.0001). Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings in more adequately sized, ad hoc, prospective studies.

Background Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (HT) is suboptimal among breast cancer patients. A high rate of nonadherence might explain differences in survival between clinical trial and clinical practice. Tailored interventions aimed at improving adherence can only be implemented if subgroups of patients at higher risk of poor adherence are identified. Because no data are available for Italy, we undertook a large survey on adherence among women taking adjuvant HT for breast cancer. Patients and Methods Patients were recruited from 10 cancer clinics in central Italy. All patients taking HT for at least 1 year were invited, during one of their follow-up visit, to fill a confidential questionnaire. The association of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of participants with adherence was assessed using logistic regression. The RECPAM method was used to evaluate interactions among variables and to identify subgroups of patients at different risk of nonadherence. Results A total of 939 patients joined the study and 18.6% of them were classified as nonadherers. Among possible predictors, only age, working status, and switching from tamoxifen to an aromatase inhibitor were predictive of nonadherence in multivariate analysis. RECPAM analysis led to the identification of 4 classes of patients with a different likelihood of nonadherence to therapy, the lowest being observed in retired women with a low level of education, the highest in the group of unmarried, employed women, or housewives. Conclusion The identification of these subgroups of “real life” patients with a high prevalence of nonadherers might be functional in designing intervention studies aimed at improving adherence.

Background The impact of previous cumulative exposure to CS before treatment start is unknown, while its use for the treatment of immune-related adverse events during PD-(L)1 therapy does not seem to reduce efficacy. We used real-world data to evaluate the effect of CS immunosuppressive dose (cumulative dose of > 700 mg of prednisone equivalent) or CS delivery modality (prolonged, daily dose >10 mg of prednisone equivalent lasting >5 days, or pulsed, duration ≤5 days) over 3 months before treatment start. Methods Patients with advanced NSCLC treated at our Institution with single agent PD-(L)1 blockade after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy and on CS treatment in the previous 3 months were included. Clinical and pharmacy records were reviewed to identify CS dose and duration. According to the label, patients must not have received CS > 10 mg prednisone or equivalent over 10 days before start of anti-PD-(L)1 therapy and had PS ≤ 1. Patients must also have received >2 cycles of PD-(L)1 blockade to be eligible for efficacy analysis. Results We identified 62 patients fulfilling our inclusion criteria, 28 (45%) and 36 (58%) of them received a CS immunosuppressive dose and pulsed CS, respectively, 8 (13%) had brain metastases, and 20 (32%) had squamous histology. As of the general population, 36 (58%) patients achieved a durable clinical benefit (DCB, partial response or stable disease >6 months). The median PFS was 4.3 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 39%. CS immunosuppressive dose was not associated with decreased DCB (44% vs 55%; p-value 0.9), nor with shorter median PFS (3.7 vs 4.4 months; HR 1.2; p-value 0.2), nor with lower 1-year survival rate (31% vs 43%; p-value 0.6). CS prolonged exposure was significantly associated with either decreased DCB (30% vs 69%; p-value 0.01) and shorter median PFS (2.7 vs 4.5 months; HR 1.8; p-value 0.05), but not with lower 1-year survival rate (29% vs 41%; p-value 0.06). Conclusions Prolonged exposure to > 10 mg of prednisone equivalent through pretreatment 3 months was associated with poorer outcome in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with second-line PD-(L)1 blockade. Legal entity responsible for the study The authors. Funding Has not received any funding. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of first-line epirubicin and docetaxel in patients with metastatic, hormonal receptor (HR)-positive, and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative breast cancer. A subgroup analysis evaluated the predictive value of immunohistochemistry-defined luminal subtype.We included patients with at least one visceral and measurable site of metastatic disease. Patients were grouped as luminal A (HR(+) and Ki6713%) or luminal B (HR(+) and Ki6713%).Forty-four patients were entered and prognostic variables were similar between the subgroups. Luminal B patients achieved higher objective response rate than luminal A (69% versus 19%; P = 0.001), longer time to progression (12.2 months versus 8.6 months; P = 0.039), and longer overall survival (24.6 months versus 19.5 months; P = 0.041). The multivariate analysis confirmed the predictive value of luminal B subtype for longer time to progression.Identification by Ki67 labelling index of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative luminal A could predict a substantial benefit from systemic chemotherapy. Endocrine therapy would be the most appropriate therapy for luminal A tumours.

Purpose Recurrences and deaths are known to occur, even if less frequently, in small, node-negative breast cancer patients, and decision on adjuvant treatments remains controversial. In the present analysis, we evaluate recurrence risk in patients with pT1 a, b, c, node-negative, breast cancer, accordingly with some prognostic biological factors. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 900 node-negative patients (pT1a, b, c) surgery treated between 2000 and 2009 in four Italian oncologic centers. We defined 3 different cohorts: ER positive (ER+); Her-2 positive (Her-2+); and triple negative (TN). Results pT1a was seen in 7.6% of patients, 37.7 % pT1b, 54.8 % pT1c. Concerning the 3 different cohorts, 58.2 % were ER+; 10.8 % were Her-2+; 8.2 % were TN. Overall, chemotherapy was given to 3.0 %, 27.2 %, 69.8 % of pT1a, b, c, respectively, and to 22.7 %, 58.8 %, 68.9 % of ER+, Her-2+, TN subgroups. At a median follow-up of 67 months, 5-year DFS was 96.3 %, 89.2 %, 89.4 % in pT1a, b, c, respectively (100 %, 93.6 %, 89.8 % in ER+; 100 %, 78.7 %, 85.0 % in Her-2+; 100 %, 76.8 %, 85.2 % in TN) (p = ns). At multivariate analysis, histologic grade and Ki-67 resulted independent prognostic factors. Overall, 5-year OS was 98 %, without differences among pT1a, b, c, or among the 3 cohorts. Conclusions Overall, 5-year DFS was very favorable in this series of small, node-negative breast cancers, but Her-2+ and TN cohorts have a higher recurrence rate than ER+ cohort (p

// Luca Moscetti 1, 8 , Maria Agnese Fabbri 1 , Clara Natoli 2 , Patrizia Vici 3 , Teresa Gamucci 4 , Isabella Sperduti 5 , Laura Iezzi 6 , Elena Iattoni 8 , Laura Pizzuti 3 , Carmine Roma 7 , Angela Vaccaro 4 , Giuliana D’Auria 1 , Mariella Mauri 7 , Lucia Mentuccia 4 , Antonino Grassadonia 2 , Maddalena Barba 3 and Enzo Maria Ruggeri 1 1 Division of Medical Oncology, AUSL Viterbo, Belcolle Hospital Strada Sammartinese, 01100 Viterbo, Italy 2 Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and CeSI-MeT University G. D'Annunzio, Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy 3 Division of Medical Oncology 2, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, 00144 Roma, Italy 4 Medical Oncology Unit, ASL Frosinone, 03100 Frosinone, Italy 5 Biostatistics Unit, Istituto Regina Elena, 00144 Rome, Italy 6 Medical Oncology Unit, SS. Annunziata Hospital, 66100 Chieti, Italy 7 Division of Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata, 00184 Rome, Italy 8 Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy Correspondence to: Luca Moscetti, email: moscetti.luca@policlinico.mo.it Keywords: fulvestrant, metastatic breast cancer, endocrine therapy, endocrine resistance Received: October 11, 2016 Accepted: March 04, 2017 Published: April 20, 2017 ABSTRACT The observational prospective trial herein presented aimed at evaluating the efficacy of fulvestrant 500 mg in the treatment of endocrine sensitive advanced breast cancer patients from the real world setting. The primary end point was clinical benefit rate (CBR). Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS) and tolerability. One hundred sixty three patients were enrolled. At a median follow up of 20 months, the 61% of patients reached CBR, whose median duration was 10.8 months. Median PFS and OS were 7 and 35 months, respectively. Endocrine sensitive patients showed better PFS and OS. No relevant toxicity appeared when analyzing safety data. In multivariate analysis, visceral involvement, endocrine sensitivity and previous endocrine therapy were prognostic factor for PFS, whereas endocrine sensitivity and metastasis at diagnosis had prognostic relevance for OS. Estrogen receptor expression >50%, single metastatic site, and no prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease were predictive of CBR. In this prospective trial, fulvestrant 500 mg appeared to be a safe and active treatment and confirmed its efficacy in the daily clinical practice. A high percent expression of estrogen receptors (above 50%) was associated with higher CBR. Treatment was very well tolerated. Endocrine sensitivity had a major impact on treatment outcome. As expected, patients who had received first-line endocrine therapy for advanced disease exhibited worse outcome and a lower CBR.

337 Background: Abiraterone acetate (AA) is a potent, selective androgen (CYP17) biosynthesis inhibitor, which showed to improve overall survival in mCRPC pts progressing after docetaxel. Few data are available concerning the clinical outcome of AA treatment in mCRPC in terms of the duration of prior androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In this retrospective analysis we assessed the PFS and OS in patients affected with mCRPC according to the duration of ADT. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of pts affected by mCRCP progressive after chemotherapy who received AA (1000 mg/d) plus prednisone (5 mg/twice daily). A total of 189 pts were included in the analysis, 71 received AA with ADT duration 50% was observed in 50 % of pts in both groups. AA was well tolerated and no relevant toxicity were observed Conclusions: This retrospective analysis showed a benefit in terms of PFS and OS in group B patients, our finding might be related to the best prognostic factors of patients in group B (less symptomatic).

MicroRNAs were described to target mRNA and regulate the transcription of genes involved in processes de-regulated in tumorigenesis, such as proliferation, differentiation and survival. In particular, the miRNA let-7 has been suggested to regulate the expression of the KRAS gene, a common mutated gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), through a let-7 complementary site (LCS) in 3′UTR of KRAS mRNA. We have reported the analysis performed on the role of the polymorphism located in the KRAS-LCS (rs61764370) which is involved in the disruption of the let-7 complementary site in NSCLC patients enrolled within the TAILOR trial, a randomised trial comparing erlotinib versus docetaxel in second line treatment. In our cohort of patients, KRAS-LCS6 polymorphism did not have any impact on both overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) and was not associated with any patient’s baseline characteristics included in the study. Overall, patients had a better prognosis when treated with docetaxel instead of erlotinib for both OS and PFS. Considering KRAS-LCS6 status, the TG/GG patients had a benefit from docetaxel treatment (HR(docetaxel vs erlotinib) = 0.35, 95% CI 0.15–0.79, p = 0.011) compared with the TT patients (HR(docetaxel vs erlotinib) = 0.72, 95% CI 0.52–1.01, p = 0.056) in terms of PFS.

Background Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are standard hormone therapy (HT) for the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal endocrine-sensitive early breast cancer. Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity is an important issue that may help clinicians identify effective clinical interventions to allow adequate treatment duration. We reviewed the main reasons for interruption of AIs at our institution from 2006 to 2009. Methods 236 patients treated with adjuvant AIs were eligible for analysis. Median age was 64 years (35-89), median follow-up 53 months (6-60). Prior adjuvant chemotherapy was taxane based in 47 patients and anthracycline based in 43 patients. 118 patients had received letrozole, 101 anastrozole, and 17 exemestane. Results Twenty-four patients (10%) needed discontinuation of the first AI assigned as a result of toxicity. Grade 2/3 arthralgia was the main reason for discontinuation in 13/24 patients. No differences in the incidence of arthralgia were noted in patients who had received taxanes or anthracyclines. Headache, alopecia, itching, diffuse skin reaction, allergic reaction with hypertensive crisis, xerostomia and xerophthalmia, insomnia and somnolence were the other reasons for discontinuation. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, age (65 years) and HT were independent factors associated with the onset of arthralgia (p = 0.006 and p = 0.008, respectively; OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.32-5.31). Alternative HT (AI or tamoxifen) was offered to patients who wanted or needed to permanently interrupt the ongoing drug. Conclusions In our analysis, 10% of patients discontinued the first AI assigned because of toxicity. Median time course of all adverse events leading to HT discontinuation was 155 days and 135 days for arthralgia. A switch to alternative HT with toxicity monitoring is a recommended option for avoiding premature and permanent interruption of an effective treatment.

In 1996, a gap between the literature evidence for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis and the prescription pattern in clinical practice was demonstrated in a drug utilization study. This study, carried out in 103 Italian oncological centers (77 new; 26 old that participated in the previous study) evaluates three different intervention strategies to implement these guidelines. In cancer patients submitted to chemotherapy, prescriptions of antiemetics were prospectively monitored for 2 consecutive weeks in 1999. Simple diffusion of guidelines was evaluated in an observational study in the 77 new centers, while the double combination of simple diffusion and “audit and feedback” strategy was randomly compared in the old centers with the triple combination of the same two strategies plus an “educational outreach visit.” Simple diffusion of guidelines improved the prescription but only for acute and delayed emesis induced by high-moderate emetogenic chemotherapy. No significant difference was detected in the prescriptions against cisplatin-induced emesis. The inappropriate use of 5-HT3 antagonists for prophylaxis of low emetogenic chemotherapy was found most frequently. Similar poor results were achieved by the audit and feedback strategy, while the educational outreach visit significantly increased the prescription of the optimal prophylaxis for cisplatin-induced acute and delayed emesis. A combination of interventions, including an educational outreach visit, seems to be a good strategy for transferring the results of antiemetic research to oncological practice.

The addition of bevacizumab to standard chemotherapy has improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in both first- and second line treatment, but the role of maintenance bevacizumab remains controversial. The association of various clinical factor and survival was examined in this retrospective cohort analysis. The clinical data from 220 previously untreated patients with mCRC, not progressive at the end of standard chemotherapy plus bevacizumab, were collected and analyzed. Patients were classified into two subgroups: those given with maintenance bevacizumab: “maintenance bevacizumab cohort (n = 118; MB)”, and those discontinuing bevacizumab as a result of physician’s or patient’s decision: “no maintenance bevacizumab cohort (n = 102; noMB)”. The baseline factors were well balanced between the study subgroups. Median PFS and OS for the general population was 10 months (range 7–15) and 22.5 months (range 18–26), respectively. Median PFS was 13 and 8 months in the BM and noBM cohorts, respectively (p < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, maintenance therapy resulted independently associated with improved PFS (HR 1.73; p < 0.001), but only objective response (OR) after first-line chemotherapy was associated with improved OS. Maintenance chemotherapy cannot be considered a standard of care after induction chemotherapy for mCRC, because the optimal balance between efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy remains a significant challenge. The results of our retrospective study suggest that maintenance therapy with bevacizumab is a safe and valuable option, particularly in those patients achieving an objective response after first-line chemotherapy.

We evaluated the efficacy of gemcitabine and carboplatin for patients affected by pretreated metastatic breast cancer. A subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive value of immunohistochemically defined breast cancer subtypes.We included human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER-2) negative metastatic breast cancer resistant to previous anthracycline-based and taxane-based chemotherapy, and HER-2 positive metastatic breast cancer with at least two progressions of disease during protracted trastuzumab-based therapy. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) intravenous (iv) on days 1 and 8) and carboplatin (area under the curve 5 iv on day 1) applied every 3 weeks.Forty-two patients were registered. Disease control was 58%, with a median time-to-progression (TTP) of 7 months (range 1-12) and a median overall survival of 10.5 months (range 1-34). Patients were grouped as triple negative (ER and PR negative, HER-2 negative), HER-2 (HER-2 positive, ER and PR negative), luminal B (ER and/or PR positive and either HER-2 positive and/or high Ki67), and luminal A (ER and/or PR positive and HER-2 negative and low Ki67). For luminal A patients, disease control was lower (luminal A 34 vs. others 67%; P = 0.02), TTP was shorter (luminal A 2.4 months vs. others 6.3 months, P = 0.015), and overall survival was shorter (luminal A 7.5 months vs. others 11.7 months, P = 0.034) than for other subtypes.Gemcitabine and carboplatin are effective for pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Luminal A subtype seems to fare poorly compared with other subtypes. Specific difference in gene expression might account for the different outcome.

Primary thymic carcinoma is a rare and heterogeneous group of tumours of the anterior mediastinum that includes different histological types. Frequently, it first comes to clinical attention through paraneoplastic syndromes such as dermatomyositis. We report the case of a 54-year-old woman with several episodes of fever and chest pain in the previous 5 months. The patient was admitted to the Rheumatology Department with a peri-ungual erythema and papular lesions on both sides of each hand and alteration at biochemistry tests. A left deltoid muscle biopsy specimen showed a histological pattern compatible with the diagnosis of dermatomyositis. A computed tomography of the chest, abdomen and pelvis, showed a solid mass in the upper anterior mediastinal area and a mediastinoscopy with mass-biopsy was performed. Only the immunohistochemical staining technique allowed a definitive histological diagnosis. We report the diagnostic challenge and the therapeutic approach of thymic neoplasia.

Aim: Eribulin (E) is a non taxane microtubule inhibitor indicated for treatment of MBC. To evaluate its tolerability, impact on Quality of Life (QoL) and symptoms improvement in MBC pts, from April 2012, we conducted a prospective observational study. Methods: Pts pretreated with anthracyclines (A) and taxanes (T) who have received 2 CHT lines for MBC, scheduled to be treated with E, were considered eligible. Pts completed ESAS at each cycle and FACT-B every 2 cycles. Outcome of QoL included the FACT-B total score, FACT-General (FACT-G) score and the Trial Outcome Index (TOI) score. Paired data were analyzed with non parametric Wilcoxon, McNemar and Friedman tests. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival calculation. Results: 50 consecutive MBC pts entered the study. Median age 64 (range 31-85), 83% of pts had PS (ECOG) 0-1, 23% had triple-negative MBC, 75% ER/PgR positive and 63% HER2 positive. All pts were pretreated with A and T, 19 (76%) also with capecitabine. Median E cycles administered was 5 (range 1-17), 31% of pts received more than 6 cycles. Main side effects G2-G3 were: 42% alopecia, 38% asthenia, 15% peripheral neuropathy,16% neutropenia. At a median follow-up of 7 months (mo) (range 2-21), 17% (CI 95% 6-28) of pts achieved partial response (PR), 39% stable disease (SD) and 44% progressive disease; disease control rate (PR + SD ≥ 6 mo) occurred in 40% of pts. Median PFS is 4 mo (95% CI, 3-5); median OS is 9 mo (CI 95% 2-16); 1-yr overall survival is 49%. Items in ESAS which at baseline had score more than >5 in at least 25% of pts were anorexia, drowsy, anxiety, loss of activity and wellbeing; all these symptoms not worsened in subsequent evaluations. Data of ESAS and QoL are reported in table. ESAS and QoL assessments were adjusted for response, PS and age. Conclusions: Our results shows that treatment with E is associated with a good maintenance of QoL and ESAS scores with expected and manageable toxicities. Basal median score(range) Final median score (range) P value ESAS 30 (3-63) 28 (3-60) 0.91 FACT- B 79 (55-117) 81(45-119) 0.36 FACT-G 59 (40-88) 60 (30-93) 0.98 TOI 53 (33-78) 52 (29-78) 0.23 Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

e12031 Background: Eribulin (E) is a nontaxane microtubule inhibitor currently indicated for third-line chemotherapy (CHT) of MBC. To evaluate its tolerability and impact on QoL and symptoms improvement in MBC pts, from April 2012, we conducted a prospective observational study. Methods: Pts pretreated with anthracycline (A) and taxane (T) who has received 2 CHT lines for MBC, scheduled to be treated with E were considered eligible. Pts complete the Edmonton Symptoms Assessment Scale (ESAS) at each cycle and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) every 2 cycles. Outcome of QoL included the FACT-B total score, FACT-General (FACT-G) score and the Trial Outcome Index (TOI) score. Groups of data were analyzed using ANOVA and the Friedman test. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival calculation. Overall Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. Results: 25 consecutive MBC pts entered the study. Median age 65 (range 31-77), PS (ECOG) 0-1 96%, 24% had triple-negative MBC, 70% ER/PgR positive and 5% HER2 positive. All pts were pretreated with A and T, 19 (76%) also with capecitabine. Median cycles 6 (range 3-13), 36% received more than 6 cycles. Five pts are to early for evaluation. Of the 20 evaluable pts main toxicity were: alopecia G1 58% and G2 42%, asthenia G2 40% peripheral neuropathy G2 25% neutropenia G2 0% and G3-G4 10%.At a median follow-up of 6 months 16% of pts achieved partial response (PR) 44% stable disease (SD) and 20% progressive disease; disease control rate (PR+SD ≥ 6 m) occurred in 40% of pts. Median PFS is 5 m (95% CI, 4-6) currently 70% of pts are alive. Data of ESAS and QoL are reported in table. Conclusions: Our preliminary results shows that treatment with E is associated with a significant improvement of ESAS scores (p=0.03) mainly in responders pts (p=0.02) and with a good maintenance of QoL with expected and manageable toxicities. Data collection is ongoing and update results will be presented. [Table: see text]

Background AIs represents the standard HT for the adjuvant treatment of post menopausal endocrine sensitive early breast cancer. A percentage of pts interrupt treatment because of toxicity. In this setting the switch to other AIs or tamoxifen (TAM) may represent an option to allow the prosecution of HT. We reviewed the main reasons for interruption of the AIs in our institution from 2006 to the present. Methods 236 pts with a minimum treatment time up of 6 months were considered eligible for analysis. Pts characteristics: median age 64 yrs (35-89), median follow up 24 months (6-28). Prior adjuvant CT: taxanes based: 47 pts, anthracyclines based: 43 pts. 118 pts (49%) had received letrozole (L), 101 (43%) anastrozole (A), 18 (8%) exemestane (E). An alternative HT (AIs or tamoxifen [T]) was offered to pts who wanted or needed to interrupt permanently the ongoing drug. Results According to the CTC NCI, arthralgia was the main toxicity observed (G1 19.4%, G2/3 5.5%/1.7%. Overall 24 out of 236 pts (10%) needed discontinuation of AIs as a result of toxicity. Grade 2 and 3 arthralgia was the main reason for discontinuation in 13/24 pts (54%). No differences in the incidence of arthralgia were noted in pts who had received taxanes or anthracyclines. Headache (n = 2), alopecia (n = 2), G3 itching (n = 2), diffuse skin reaction (n = 1) allergic reaction with hypertensive crisis (n = 1), xerostomia and xerophthalmia (n = 1), insomnia (n = 1) and somnolence (n = 1) were the other reasons for discontinuance. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, age (65 yrs) and HT represent independent factors associated with the onset of arthralgia (respectively p = 0.006 and 0.008, OR 2.65, CI95: 1.32-5.31). 17/24 pts were switched to E, 5 to T and 1 each to L and A. In pts who switched to another AI we observed a reduction in the severity of the arthralgia but not its complete resolution. A complete resolution of symptoms was observed for the other toxicities except for allergic reactions that recurred after switching from L to A. Moreover, the patient with the diffuse skin reaction, chose discontinuation of HT. Conclusions In our analysis, 10% of pts discontinued AIs due to toxicity. Switching to alternative HT, and monitoring the toxicity, represent an option to offer to pts in order to avoid a premature and permanent interruption of an effective treatment. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

LBA7501 Background: While the benefit of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations has been widely established, their value in treating patients with wt EGFR is still debated. To assess the role of erlotinib in these patients, we performed an independent multicenter phase III trial (Tarceva Italian Lung Optimization Trial [TAILOR] NCT00637910), comparing erlotinib to docetaxel in second line treatment, having overall (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) as principal and secondary endpoints, respectively. Methods: EGFR and KRAS mutational status were assessed by direct sequencing in all eligible patients; only patients with wt EGFR NSCLC (exons 19 and 21) at progression, and previously treated with a first line platinum-based regimen, were randomized to receive either erlotinib 150 mg daily or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (3-weekly) or 35 mg/m2 (weekly) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. To detect an hazard ratio of 0.67 (2-sided 5% significance level for the log-rank test and a power of 80%), 199 events were required for both OS and PFS evaluation. Results: On the planned analysis date (March 30, 2012), 221 patients had been randomized and 218 were evaluable (docetaxel 110, erlotinib 108; three major violations excluded). At a median follow-up of 20 months, 199 relapses and 157 deaths were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier PFS curves showed a highly significant increase favoring docetaxel (HR 0.70 with 95% CI 0.53-0.94; p = 0.016) over erlotinib regimen. The HR translated into an estimated absolute difference in 6-months PFS of 12% (16% vs 28%). Data concerning toxicity were consistent with the literature. Conclusions: In terms of PFS, our results indicate a clear superiority of docetaxel over erlotinib as second line treatment for patients without EGFR mutations in exons 19 or 21. Analysis of OS will be conducted as far as the planned number of 199 deaths is reached.

LBA7501 Background: While the benefit of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations has been widely established, their value in treating patients with wt EGFR is still debated. To assess the role of erlotinib in these patients, we performed an independent multicenter phase III trial (Tarceva Italian Lung Optimization Trial [TAILOR] NCT00637910), comparing erlotinib to docetaxel in second line treatment, having overall (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) as principal and secondary endpoints, respectively. Methods: EGFR and KRAS mutational status were assessed by direct sequencing in all eligible patients; only patients with wt EGFR NSCLC (exons 19 and 21) at progression, and previously treated with a first line platinum-based regimen, were randomized to receive either erlotinib 150 mg daily or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (3-weekly) or 35 mg/m2 (weekly) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. To detect an hazard ratio of 0.67 (2-sided 5%...

612 Background: Maintenance treatment with B is considered an option for mCRC pts in responding pts after a first line CT + B, but few data are available on its real benefit on PFS. Methods: We collected data from a cohort of mCRC pts consecutively treated in five oncologic centers of Lazio. One-hundred-ninety-nine mCRC pts treated with first line CT + B achieving a response [partial (PR) or complete (CR)] or a stable disease (SD) were considered eligible, 117 pts had received B maintenance (BM) whereas 82 did not (noBM). The two groups were homogeneous for main characteristics. First-line therapy in the BM vs noBM group included FOLFIRI regimen (96 vs 59 pts), FOLFOX (18 vs 22 pts) and FUFA (3 vs 1 pts). K-ras status was analyzed in 115 pts with an higher percentage of wild-type (wt) in the BM group (65 vs 50 pts, p= 0.04). A CR or PR have been achieved in 65% of pts in the BM group and 61% of noBM group, while a SD was observed in 35% and 39% of pts respectively for the BM and noBM group. The median number of BM cycles administered was 7 (range 3-25). Effectiveness measures included the PFS duration. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was developed using stepwise regression (forward selection) Results: At a median follow-up of 18 months (1-109), the median PFS was 13 months (C.I.95%: 11-15) vs 8 months (C.I.95%: 7-10; p Conclusions: The maintenance strategy with B shows a longer PFS in pts responding to the first line chemotherapy + B whereas for pts who achieving an SD no difference was observed.

In a randomized trial with a median follow-up of 18.4 months, 6 months of induction chemotherapy with a three-drug regimen comprising 5-fluorouracil (by continuous infusion)-leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOXIRI) demonstrated statistically significant improvements in response rate, radical surgical resection of metastases, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared with 6 months of induction chemotherapy with fluorouracil-leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI).From November 14, 2001, to April 22, 2005, we enrolled 244 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. To evaluate if the superiority of FOLFOXIRI is maintained in the long term, we updated the overall and progression-free survival data to include events that occurred up to February 12, 2009, with a median follow-up of 60.6 months. We performed a subgroup and a risk-stratified analysis to examine whether outcomes differed in specific patient subgroups, and we analyzed the results of treatment after progression. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox regression models were fit to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical tests were two-sided.FOLFOXIRI demonstrated statistically significant improvements in median progression-free survival (9.8 vs 6.8 months, HR for progression = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.45 to 0.76, P.001) and median overall survival (23.4 vs 16.7 months, HR for death = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.96, P = .026) with a 5-year survival rate of 15% (95% CI = 9% to 23%) vs 8% (95% CI = 4% to 14%). The improvements in progression-free survival and, to a lesser extent, in overall survival were evident even when the analysis excluded patients who received radical resection of metastases. With regard to the risk-stratified analysis, FOLFOXIRI results in longer progression-free survival and overall survival than FOLFIRI in all risk subgroups.Six months of induction chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI is associated with a clinically significant improvement in the long-term outcome compared with FOLFIRI with an absolute benefit in survival at 5 years of 7%.

e12514 Background: A systematic review of patients affected with primary brain cancer treated with post-operative TMZ+RT and TMZ maintenance was undertaken in order to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity in an unselected population. Methods: Ninety-nine patients were detected. Main characteristics were: median age 62 years (range 28-80); M/F: 58/41; PS 0/1: 92 pts; complete resection: 20; subtotal resection: 75, biopsy only: 4. The median RT dose delivered was 60 Gy (range 40-60 Gy). All the 99 pts received TMZ at 75 mg/m2 concomitantly to RT. Maintenance therapy with TMZ was given to non progressive pts, starting 6 weeks after chemoradiation, at the dose of 150 mg/m2 for the 1st cycle and 200 mg/m2 q 4 weeks d. 1-5 for subsequent cycles and continued until disease progression or intolerance. Results: Patients with evaluable disease (n=79 pts) had an overall response rate of 16% (12 partial response and 1 complete response), while a stable disease was observed in 49/79 pts (62%). Maintenance TMZ was given to 77/99 pts (78%). Hematologic toxicities (CTCAE v.3) include: Gr. 3/4 neutropenia (4%), febrile neutropenia (1%), Gr. 3/4 thrombocytopenia (13%), Gr. 3 anemia (1%). One pt developed a bone marrow aplasia and another one a Steven-Johnson syndrome recovered after high supportive treatment. Toxicities caused discontinuation of TMZ in 9 patients (11%). At 2-yrs, at both univariate and multivariate analysis, a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and in overall survival (OS) was observed in pts completely resected and in pts achieving a response or a stable disease >6 months. In pts achieving a response and in pts completely resected the HR for the 2-yrs PFS was 0.06 (95%CI 0.03-0.11, p

e18065 Background: PEM plus platinum–based regimen is a standard of care in chemonaïve advanced non-squamous NSCLC pts. This retrospective multicenter analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive value of clinical variables for PFS in an unselected population. Methods: Data were obtained by reviewing the clinical data of pts affected with advanced NSCLC treated from 2009 to 2011. 193 pts were retrieved. Main characteristics were: median age: 63 years (range 33-79); male/female (M/F): 67%/33%; ECOG PS 0-1: 97%; weight loss >5%: 34%; current smoker 31%. Stage IV disease: 81% ; ≥ 1 site of metastasis: 79%. Brain metastasis: 28% of pts at diagnosis. Results: All 193 pts are evaluable for analysis. 158 pts (82%) received the cisplatin- and 35 pts (18%) the carboplatin-based regimen. Most pts received at least 2 cycles of therapy and 21% received PEM maintenance treatment. The overall disease control rate observed was 69%. (CR+PR = 44%, SD 25%). At a median follow-up of 6.7 months (range 1-22), the median PFS was 6 months (95%CI 5-7) with a 1 year-PFS rate of 16.8%. In the Cox multivariate analysis, factors found to be associated with a statistically significant longer PFS were: gender (M vs F, HR 1.68, C.I.95% 1.19-2.38; p=0.003); no. of metastatic site (>1 vs 1, HR 1.6, 95%CI 1.07-2.40; p=0.02); type of response (CR/PR vs no response, HR 2.74, 95%CI 1.95-3.86; p

e14082 Background: Use of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in Stage II Colon Cancer (CC) is still under debate. Choice should be based on patients (pts) and disease characteristics. According to worldwide guidelines AC should be considered in high-risk (H) T3N0 pts. No data are available for better option in low-risk (L) pts. Aim of the study is to evaluate relapse-free survival (RFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) retrospectively in T3N0 CC pts related to treatment. Methods: RFS and DFS are evaluated with Kaplan Meier method. In order to find the optimal cut off for node number the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis and Maximally Selected Rank Statistics were performed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was developed using stepwise regression, enter limit and remove limit were p = 0.10 and p = 0.15 respectively. Results: 1,000 pts with T3N0 CC were recruited. To date, data of 926 pts are available. Median age was 69 (29-93), M/F 513/413, Grading 1/2/3 46/668/158; 360 L (39%), 411 H (44%), 155 unknown (17%); 137 (15%) pts showed symptoms (S) at diagnosis: 51 pts had perforation (P) or bowel obstruction (BO). Median sampled lymph nodes (LN) were 15 (1-76); 383 (41%) pts were treated with AC. Median follow up (fu) was 5 years (yr) (range 3-24). Survival analysis was performed only for pts with a minimum fu of 3 yr and younger than 80 (80%). 5 yr RFS was 78% and 5 yr DFS was 76% At multivariate analysis S and AC were prognostic factors for RFS. AC is prognostic factor for all endpoints (data are shown in table). In L group 5 yr RFS was 88% in treated pts and 75% in non-treated pts (p 0.03); in H group was respectively 82% and 72% (p 0.006). Conclusions: Preliminary data confirmed the role of known prognostic factors and suggest the relevance of AC also in L stage II T3N0 CC pts. However, the highest risk in L subgroup should be identified to be submitted to AC. Data collection is ongoing, update results will be presented. [Table: see text]

e16054 Background: in the TROPIC trial, cabazitaxel+prednisone(CbzP) improved survival vs Mitox+P in patients(pts) with mCRPC who progressed on or after docetaxel(D). Few data are available in the ...