Search

INTRODUCTION: Disparities observed in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality among blacks and Hispanics compared to whites may be in part due to lower screening rates. The New York City (NYC) Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) has implemented a patient navigator (PN) program at NYC hospitals serving lower income patients to promote high adherence by patients referred for screening colonoscopy. A prior study showed this PN program increased adherence at 3 public hospitals. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of expanding the PN program to 10 hospital sites by assessing the impact of the PN program on adherence to screening colonoscopy in a large, urban, lower-income population. METHODS: Data were collected from 2007 through the first quarter of 2012 from PN sites. One site also contributed data from the pilot phase of the project, from 2005–2006. Adherence to scheduled screening colonoscopy among those ≥ 50 years was assessed among 10 hospital sites in NYC participating in the colonoscopy PN program. RESULTS: Among the 37,077 asymptomatic adults ≥ 50 years who were scheduled for a screening colonoscopy from 2005 to the first quarter of 2012, 84.2% (83.2% of black, 84.9% of Hispanic and 87.5% of white adults) were adherent to scheduled colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Expansion of PN programs to navigate all patients referred for a colonoscopy was feasible in a large, urban setting. This can be implemented resulting in high overall adherence rates to screening colonoscopies. The program likely did not result in large ethnic disparities.

There is marked variability in colonoscopy quality, limiting its effectiveness in colorectal cancer prevention. Multiple indicators have been established as markers for colonoscopy quality; however, there are conflicting data on the effects of quality reporting programs on endoscopist performance. In this study, we investigate the impact of a multicenter quarterly report card initiative on colonoscopy quality metric performance. Data were collected from 194 endoscopists at 10 participating sites throughout New York City using a Qualified Clinical Data Registry from January 2013 to December 2014. Adenoma detection rate (ADR), cecal intubation rate, withdrawal time, bowel preparation quality and appropriate interval recommendations were tracked. Report cards were distributed to each site on a quarterly basis and technical assistance was provided as needed. Performance trends were analyzed using the Cochran–Armitage trend and analysis of variance tests. 37,258 screening colonoscopies were performed during the study period. There was a positive performance trend for ADR over time from the first quarter of 2013 to the last quarter of 2014 (15.6–25.7%; p

There is marked variability in colonoscopy quality, limiting its effectiveness in colorectal cancer prevention. Multiple indicators have been established as markers for colonoscopy quality; however, there are conflicting data on the effects of quality reporting programs on endoscopist performance. In this study, we investigate the impact of a multicenter quarterly report card initiative on colonoscopy quality metric performance.Data were collected from 194 endoscopists at 10 participating sites throughout New York City using a Qualified Clinical Data Registry from January 2013 to December 2014. Adenoma detection rate (ADR), cecal intubation rate, withdrawal time, bowel preparation quality and appropriate interval recommendations were tracked. Report cards were distributed to each site on a quarterly basis and technical assistance was provided as needed. Performance trends were analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage trend and analysis of variance tests.37,258 screening colonoscopies were performed during the study period. There was a positive performance trend for ADR over time from the first quarter of 2013 to the last quarter of 2014 (15.6-25.7%; p 0.001). There were also increases in cecal intubation rates (78.2-92.6%; p 0.001), bowel preparation adequacy rates (77.5-92.8%; p 0.001), and adherence to appropriate screening intervals (28.0-55.0%; p 0.001). There was no clinically significant change in mean withdrawal time.The implementation of a quarterly report card initiative resulted in statistically significant improvements in adenoma detection, cecal intubation, bowel preparation adequacy rates, and appropriate recommended screening intervals.

BACKGROUND Although screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) is a widely accepted concept nationally and screening rates are increasing, there are differences in screening rates between states and within states. METHODS In an effort to increase screening rates and ensure equal access with respect to race/ethnicity, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene formed a coalition of stakeholders in 2003, with its primary focus on colonoscopy, to develop and implement strategies across the city to achieve this goal. RESULTS From a screening colonoscopy rate of only 42% in 2003, these concerted efforts contributed to achieving a screening rate of 62% by 2007 and a screening rate of almost 70% in 2014 with the elimination of racial and ethnic disparities. CONCLUSIONS This article provides details of how this program was successfully conceived, implemented, and sustained in the large urban population of New York City. The authors hope that by sharing the many elements involved and the lessons learned, they may help other communities to adapt these experiences to their own environments so that CRC screening rates can be maximized. Cancer 2016;122:269–277. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Although screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) is a widely accepted concept nationally and screening rates are increasing, there are differences in screening rates between states and within states.In an effort to increase screening rates and ensure equal access with respect to race/ethnicity, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene formed a coalition of stakeholders in 2003, with its primary focus on colonoscopy, to develop and implement strategies across the city to achieve this goal.From a screening colonoscopy rate of only 42% in 2003, these concerted efforts contributed to achieving a screening rate of 62% by 2007 and a screening rate of almost 70% in 2014 with the elimination of racial and ethnic disparities.This article provides details of how this program was successfully conceived, implemented, and sustained in the large urban population of New York City. The authors hope that by sharing the many elements involved and the lessons learned, they may help other communities to adapt these experiences to their own environments so that CRC screening rates can be maximized. Cancer 2016;122:269-277. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third most common cause of cancer deaths in both men and women in the United States. Blacks have been reported to have a higher incidence and mortality and a more proximal anatomic distribution of CRC compared to whites and Hispanics. However, it is unclear whether this is due to biological differences in the pathology of adenomatous polyps or lower screening rates. Existing data consisting of retrospective studies and one single center prospective study indicate that factors such as access to health care and modifiable risk factors may be responsible for these racial disparities as opposed to biological differences. Methods: In 2003, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (NYC DOHMH) implemented the Colonoscopy Patient Navigator Program (CPNP). Ten New York City Hospital Sites, five public and five private, participated in the study. Through a one to one relationship, PN helped to bridge disparities by scheduling appointments, educating regarding bowel preparation and addressing obstacles. Data were prospectively collected from 2005 through the first quarter of 2012 from centers with at least three consecutive years of reporting while using PN. Patient information including name, contact information, gender, date of birth, ethnicity and insurance information was collected by each PN during the initial contact after the patient was referred for screening colonoscopy (sCo). Adenoma and cancer detection rates, pathology and location were recorded and stratified by patient demographic characteristics including age, gender, and race. Results: With the assistance of PN, 29,711 individuals ages 50 and older underwent complete sCo. A total of 6226 adenomas and 35 cancers were found. The prevalence of adenomas was higher among white patients than black patients (27.45% versus 19.35%, p value < 0.05) (See tables 1 and 2). With the exception of the hepatic flexure, whites had a statistically significant higher prevalence of adenomas, segment by segment, than blacks and Hispanics. Conclusion: This is a prospective multicenter center study of a large urban cohort investigating the prevalence of adenomas in blacks versus whites and Hispanics using a PN program. Preliminary data do not show that blacks have an increased risk of adenomas compared to whites and Hispanics. This suggests that the higher incidence and mortality from CRC in blacks that was reported in other studies aremore likely a function of access to colonoscopy as opposed to biologic factors. Table 1: Results of completed screening colonoscopy exams cross-tabulated by patient race (age ≥ 50)