Search

Objective To evaluate the long-term safety of NKTR-181, a novel mu-opioid receptor agonist that may have reduced human abuse potential, in patients with moderate to severe chronic low back pain (CLBP) or other chronic noncancer pain (CNP). Design Uncontrolled, multicenter, open-label, long-term study of NKTR-181 comprised of three periods: screening (≤21 days), treatment (52 weeks), and safety follow-up (∼14 days after the last dose of NKTR-181). Setting Multicenter, long-term clinical research study. Methods NKTR-181 administered at doses of 100–600 mg twice daily (BID) was evaluated in opioid-naïve and opioid-experienced patients. Patients were enrolled de novo or following completion of the randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 efficacy study (SUMMIT-07). Safety assessments included adverse event documentation, measurements of opioid withdrawal, and clinical laboratory tests. Effectiveness was assessed using the modified Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (mBPI-SF). Results The study enrolled 638 patients. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were constipation (26%) and nausea (12%). Serious TEAEs, reported in 5% of patients, were deemed by investigators to be unrelated to NKTR-181. There were no deaths or reported cases of respiratory depression. A sustained reduction in mBPI-SF pain intensity and pain interference from baseline to study termination was observed throughout treatment. Only 2% of patients discontinued NKTR-181 due to lack of efficacy, and 11% discontinued due to treatment-related AEs. NKTR-181 doses of up to 600 mg BID were generally well tolerated, and patients experienced low rates of opioid-related adverse events. Conclusions The study results support the premise that NKTR-181 is a safe and effective option for patients with moderate to severe CLBP or CNP.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a selective estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) agonist, Dr. Tagliaferri's Menopause Formula (MF102), to treat the symptoms of menopause.An open-label trial of MF102 taken for 12 weeks by 30 postmenopausal women aged 40-65 years, who experienced a minimum of five moderate to severe hot flushes per day. The primary efficacy outcome was a change in the frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes from baseline to week 12. A change in the frequency of hot flushes that woke participants from their sleep from baseline to 12 weeks was a secondary endpoint. Lipid profile and endometrial thickness were also evaluated.Thirty postmenopausal women with an average of nine moderate to severe hot flushes per day were treated with MF102 4 g/day; 27 participants completed the study. The median percent reduction in moderate to severe hot flushes was 71% (p 0.001). The median percent reduction in hot flushes that woke participants from their sleep was 54% (p 0.001). Low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) and total cholesterol both declined significantly from baseline. There were no serious adverse events, reports of abnormal uterine bleeding, or significant changes in double-wall endometrial thickness.Treatment with MF102 resulted in a marked decrease in the frequency of moderate to severe hot flushes, was well-tolerated, and demonstrated no safety concerns.

TPS589 Background: Checkpoint inhibitors can achieve durable responses in cis-ineligible 1L mUC. However, use is restricted to patients whose tumors are PD-L1 high. Approximately 70% of cis-ineligible patients have tumors with low PD-L1 expression, leaving a significant proportion of 1L mUC patients in need of new treatment options. Bempegaldesleukin (BEMPEG; NKTR-214) is a CD122-preferential IL-2 pathway agonist designed to provide sustained signaling through the IL-2 βγ receptor. NIVO is an anti-PD-1 antibody that is approved for treatment in several types of cancers, including 2L mUC after treatment with a platinum agent. Early BEMPEG plus NIVO data in 1L mUC (cis-eligible and -ineligible) patients found an objective response rate (ORR) of 48% (13/27) in the efficacy evaluable population (defined as having undergone at least one post-baseline scan) and a CR rate of 19%, prompting this further exploration of BEMPEG plus NIVO in a phase 2 study (Siefker-Radke, 2019). Methods: This Phase 2 multi-national trial evaluates BEMPEG plus NIVO in previously untreated patients with cis-ineligible mUC. Eligibility also requires tumor tissue be analyzed by central laboratory to document PD-L1 status. Approximately 205 patients will be enrolled. BEMPEG (0.006 mg/kg) and NIVO (360 mg) are given intravenously (IV) on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle. The primary endpoint is ORR assessed per RECIST 1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) in patients with low PD-L1 expression (defined as Combined Positive Score [CPS] < 10). Secondary endpoints include ORR and duration of response in all treated patients, safety, and tolerability. Tumor and blood samples will be collected for biomarker analyses. Enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03785925.

459 Background: Baseline patient characteristics may impact duration on study and survivorship of patients in immunotherapy trials. In this study, GVAX pancreas (GM-CSF–secreting allogeneic pancreatic tumor cells) was administered with low-dose cyclophosphamide (Cy), with or without subsequent CRS-207 (live-attenuated Listeria monocytogenes–expressing mesothelin) infusion. Baseline clinical and immunological data were examined for two patient subsets based on duration on study. Methods: Previously treated patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned at a ratio of 2:1 to 2 doses of Cy/GVAX followed by 4 doses of CRS-207 or 6 doses of Cy/GVAX every 3 weeks. Stable patients were offered additional courses. Patients were evaluated for post-randomization duration on study of < 60 days (rapid dropouts, RD) and > 18 months (long-term survivors, LTS). Baseline characteristics of these subsets were examined. Results: A total of 93 patients were randomized. Fifteen patients were RD; 13 were LTS. More RDs versus LTS had liver metastasis and lymph node involvement. On average, fewer RD patients had radiotherapy prior to randomization and fewer had prior surgical intervention. RD averaged 1.73 prior metastatic cancer treatment regimens versus 1.31 in LTS. RD also had higher average baseline CA 19-9 levels. Immune analysis showed higher circulating terminal effector CD8+ T cells and lower serum IL-6 in LTS compared to RD. Serum IL-6 concentration remained lower in LTS at four weeks following initiation of treatment. For patients who received CRS-207, CD8+ T cells specific to listeriolysin O (LLO) and mesothelin were higher in LTS than RD, as determined by ELISPOT. Conclusions: Baseline clinical and immunological characteristics may impact patient duration on immunotherapy trials. Immune monitoring and biomarker analysis in this study is ongoing to identify circulating cellular, tumor biomarkers and genomic (miRNA and mRNA) signatures that may correlate with survival. These findings warrant continued exploration of patient characteristics to identify best candidates for immunotherapy trials. Clinical trial information: NCT01417000.