Search

Aim of the study: The aim of this study is to evaluate the resistance of different marginal fit geometries for a provissional fixed dental prothesis, which can have an impact on the periodontal health. Materials and methods: Acording to the principles of the tooth preparation, four types of marginal design were made: feather edge, rounded shoulder, chamfer and heavy chamfer. Using a direct technique, prepared teeth were poured into metal abutments, temporary composite resin crowns were made and cemented. All four abutments were analyzed using theoretical and experimental methods. Results: The results obtained from the mechanical tests were more reliable than those obtained from numerical analyses. A chamfer marginal finish line a pre prosthetic periodontal therapy can have greater impact on the soft tissue healing process. Conclusions: These preliminary studies enhance the idea of ​​differentiating preparations for distinctive alternative prosthetic treatment plans.

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the marginal fit of prefabricated occlusal veneers with computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM)-milled zirconia occlusal veneers in the posterior teeth. Settings and Design: Forty extracted human maxillary premolars were divided into two groups of 20 each. Group 1 was prepared to receive prefabricated occlusal veneers, and Group 2 was prepared to receive CAD-CAM-milled zirconia occlusal veneers. Materials and Methods: Prefabricated samples (Edelweiss) were selected for Group 1, whereas for Group 2, the tooth preparations were scanned, and occlusal veneers were fabricated using Exocad designing software and milling machine. After luting, both the groups were submerged in dye, sectioned, and evaluated for marginal fit and microleakage under a stereomicroscope using the microscope imaging software and its measurement tool. Statistical Analysis Used: Data collected were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS 27.0. Intragroup and intergroup comparison was done using the Mann–Whitney U test. The Chi-square test was applied to check the depth of penetration of dye based on percentages. Results: The marginal gap of zirconia occlusal veneers fabricated with CAD-CAM is higher compared to that of prefabricated occlusal veneers. Similarly, the depth of penetration of dye is higher in CAD-CAM-milled zirconia occlusal veneers than prefabricated occlusal veneers. Conclusion: The marginal fit of prefabricated occlusal veneer is better than the marginal fit of zirconia occlusal veneers fabricated with CAD-CAM. Similarly, it can also be concluded that the microleakage of prefabricated occlusal veneer is less compared to the CAD-CAM-milled zirconia occlusal veneers.

Abstract Background Interim crowns are utilized for restoring implants during and after the process of osseointegration. However, studies on adaptation and fracture strength of implant-supported interim crowns are rare. Aim of the study The aim of this in vitro study is evaluating marginal fit and fracture resistance of conventional, subtractive, and additive methods of fabricating implant-supported interim crowns. Materials and methods An implant was placed in an epoxy resin model with a missing first molar. A scan body was attached, and scanned with an intraoral scanner (IOS), the STL file was used to fabricate eighteen master models with standardized implant digital analogue spaces. The digital analogues and their corresponding abutments were attached to the master models and scanned with the IOS, the STL files were used to fabricate eighteen crowns using three different techniques (n = 6): conventional (CR); from Autopolymerizing composite resin, subtractive (SM); milled from PMMA resin blanks, and additive (AM); from 3D printed resin material. The crowns were fitted and cemented on their corresponding abutments and subjected to cyclic loading and thermocycling. The marginal fit was evaluated using a stereomicroscope. The crowns were then loaded until fractured in a universal testing machine. The Shapiro–Wilk and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests revealed that data of Marginal gap was non-parametric. Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Dunn test was used (α = 0.05). While data of Fracture resistance test was parametric. ANOVA (F-test) was used followed by the Tukey test (α = 0.05). Results For marginal gap, a significant difference was shown between the study groups (P = .001) according to Kruskal–Wallis test. Groups SM and AM had significantly lower marginal gap values compared to group CR (P = .003). No significant difference was found between groups SM and AM (P = .994). For fracture resistance, One-way ANOVA revealed a significant difference in fracture resistance between study groups (P

Background: Interim crowns are utilized for restoring implants during and after the process of osseointegration. However, studies on adaptation and fracture strength of implant-supported interim crowns are rare. Aim of the study: The aim of this in vitro study is evaluating marginal fit and fracture resistance of conventional, subtractive, and additive methods of fabricating implant-supported interim crowns. Materials and methods: An implant was placed in an epoxy resin model with a missing first molar. A scan body was attached, and scanned with an intraoral scanner (IOS), the STL file was used to fabricate eighteen master models with standardized implant digital analogue spaces. The digital analogues and their corresponding abutments were attached to the master models and scanned with the IOS, the STL files were used to fabricate eighteen crowns using three different techniques (n = 6): conventional (CR); from Autopolymerizing composite resin, subtractive (SM); milled from PMMA resin blanks, and additive (AM); from 3D printed resin material. The crowns were fitted and cemented on their corresponding abutments and subjected to cyclic loading and thermocycling. The marginal fit was evaluated using a stereomicroscope. The crowns were then loaded until fractured in a universal testing machine. The Shapiro–Wilk and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests revealed that data of Marginal gap was non-parametric. Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Dunn test was used (α = 0.05). While data of Fracture resistance test was parametric. ANOVA (F-test) was used followed by the Tukey test (α = 0.05). Results: For marginal gap, a significant difference was shown between the study groups (P =.001) according to Kruskal–Wallis test. Groups SM and AM had significantly lower marginal gap values compared to group CR (P =.003). No significant difference was found between groups SM and AM (P =.994). For fracture resistance, One-way ANOVA revealed a significant difference in fracture resistance between study groups (P <.001). Group SM had significantly higher fracture strength followed by group AM and group CR (P =.001). Conclusions: Group SM and AM showed better marginal adaptation than group CR. Group SM showed superior fracture resistance compared to other groups. All study groups showed acceptable marginal gap and fracture resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim of the study: The aim of this study is to evaluate the resistance of different marginal fit geometries for a provissional fixed dental prothesis, which can have an impact on the periodontal health. Materials and methods: Acording to the principles of the tooth preparation, four types of marginal design were made: feather edge, rounded shoulder, chamfer and heavy chamfer. Using a direct technique, prepared teeth were poured into metal abutments, temporary composite resin crowns were made and cemented. All four abutments were analyzed using theoretical and experimental methods. Results: The results obtained from the mechanical tests were more reliable than those obtained from numerical analyses. A chamfer marginal finish line a pre prosthetic periodontal therapy can have greater impact on the soft tissue healing process. Conclusions: These preliminary studies enhance the idea of differentiating preparations for distinctive alternative prosthetic treatment plans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background.: The present study assessed the impact of thermomechanical aging on the marginal fit of hybrid ceramic, reinforced composite resin, and lithium disilicate ceramic. Methods.: Eighteen human upper first premolars freshly extracted for orthodontic purposes were used to fabricate 18 CAD-CAM veneers and divided into three groups based on materials used: group H (n=6): hybrid ceramics (Vita Enamic), group R (n=6): reinforced composite resin (Brilliant crios), and group L (n=6): lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS e-max CAD). Each material's cementation procedure was carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions. The vertical marginal gap between the laminate veneer margin and the prepared tooth finish line was measured to assess the specimens by digital microscopy. Subsequently, all the samples were thermomechanically cycled (TMC) (5 °C to 55 °C, 30 seconds, 75000 cycles). Then, the vertical marginal gap was re-evaluated. Results.: The Brilliant crios group displayed a significantly lower vertical marginal gap mean score (31.36±2.82 µm) followed by Vita Enamic (39.27±6.54 µm) and E max (41.39±3.97 µm) groups. Similarly, after thermomechanical aging, the Brilliant crios group displayed a significantly lower vertical marginal gap mean score (41.83±8.28 µm) followed by Vita Enamic (55.47±18.65 µm), and the E max group showed the greatest vertical marginal gap mean score (59.43±16.27 µm). Conclusion.: Thermomechanical aging affected the marginal fit of different materials employed in the current research, and these changes were under the established clinical limit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare the marginal fit of prefabricated occlusal veneers with computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM)-milled zirconia occlusal veneers in the posterior teeth. Settings and Design: Forty extracted human maxillary premolars were divided into two groups of 20 each. Group 1 was prepared to receive prefabricated occlusal veneers, and Group 2 was prepared to receive CAD-CAM-milled zirconia occlusal veneers. Materials and Methods: Prefabricated samples (Edelweiss) were selected for Group 1, whereas for Group 2, the tooth preparations were scanned, and occlusal veneers were fabricated using Exocad designing software and milling machine. After luting, both the groups were submerged in dye, sectioned, and evaluated for marginal fit and microleakage under a stereomicroscope using the microscope imaging software and its measurement tool. Statistical Analysis Used: Data collected were subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS 27.0. Intragroup and intergroup comparison was done using the Mann--Whitney U test. The Chi-square test was applied to check the depth of penetration of dye based on percentages. Results: The marginal gap of zirconia occlusal veneers fabricated with CAD-CAM is higher compared to that of prefabricated occlusal veneers. Similarly, the depth of penetration of dye is higher in CAD-CAM-milled zirconia occlusal veneers than prefabricated occlusal veneers. Conclusion: The marginal fit of prefabricated occlusal veneer is better than the marginal fit of zirconia occlusal veneers fabricated with CAD-CAM. Similarly, it can also be concluded that the microleakage of prefabricated occlusal veneer is less compared to the CAD-CAM-milled zirconia occlusal veneers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PurposeThe aim of the in vitro study was to compare the internal merge and marginal perfection of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) crowns under a stereomicroscope. MethodsAll-ceramic preparation is done on the maxillary first premolar which is mounted on the wax block which was scanned using 3Shape scanner and duplicated into 30 acrylic CAD/CAM dies (n = 15) for the placement of PEEK and PEKK crowns. The YENADENT milling system was used to fabricate 15 samples from Group A PEEK crowns and to fabricate 15 samples from Group B PEKK crowns. According to the manufacturer’s instructions, an equal amount of the dual-cure resin luting agent (Rely X U200 Self-Adhesive resin, 3M, Germany) was dispensed on the mixing pad before being mixed with cement and painted on the internal surfaces of the copings with the finger pressure crowns which were luted. The values were then analyzed using one-way ANOVA (post hoc) followed by Dunnett’s t-test. ResultsAmong those two groups, PEEK group materials showed the lowest mean value of (28.73.3 ± 4.01) for marginal fit and (26.72 ± 2.53) for internal gap, whereas PEKK group showed a mean value of (32.85 ± 4.63) and (33.06 ± 4.14), respectively. ConclusionAmong these two groups, comparatively less marginal fit and internal adaptation is seen in PEKK when compared to the PEEK crowns. While the marginal fit and internal adaptation of both PEEK and PEKK copings were in acceptable clinical range.

The marginal accuracy of fit between prosthetic restorations and abutment teeth represents an essential aspect with regard to long-term clinical success. Since the final gap is also influenced by the luting techniques and materials applied, this study analyzed the accuracy of the fit of single-tooth zirconia copings before and after cementation using different luting materials. Forty plaster dies with a corresponding zirconia coping were manufactured based on a single tooth chamfer preparation. The copings were luted on the plaster dies (n = 10 per luting material) with a zinc phosphate (A), glass–ionomer (B), self-adhesive resin (C), or resin-modified glass–ionomer cement (D). The accuracy of fit for each coping was assessed using a non-destructive digital method. Intragroup statistical analysis was conducted using Wilcoxon signed rank tests and intergroup analysis by Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests (α = 0.05). Accuracy of fit was significantly different before/after cementation within A (0.033/0.110 µm) and B (0.035/0.118 µm; p = 0.002). A had a significantly increased marginal gap compared to C and D, and B compared to C and D (p ≤ 0.001). Significantly increased vertical discrepancies between A and B versus C and D (p < 0.001) were assessed. Of the materials under investigation, the zinc phosphate cement led to increased vertical marginal discrepancies, whereas the self-adhesive resin cement did not influence the restoration fit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to compare the impact of CAD/CAM closed systems and open systems on the marginal gap of monolithic zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) ceramic crowns, as both systems are used in everyday dentistry, both chair-side and laboratory. For the closed system, 20 plastic teeth were scanned by a Primescan intra-oral scanner (IOS), and for the open system, the same number of plastic teeth were scanned by Trios 4 IOS. For the closed system, CEREC software was used, and for the open system, EXOCAD software was used. All 40 ZLS crowns were grinded by the same four-axis machine and cemented with Temp-bond, followed by self-adhesive resin cement. For each type of cement, an evaluation of the marginal gap was conducted by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Before comparisons between the groups, a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was performed on the study variables showing a normal distribution (p > 0.05). Independent T tests (α = 0.05) and paired-sample T tests (α = 0.05) were used. The independent T test found no significant mean marginal gap differences in the zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns bonded with Temp-bond and scanned by Primescan (28.09 μm ± 3.06) compared to Trios 4 (28.94 μm ± 3.30) (p = 0.401), and there was no significant mean marginal gap differences in zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns bonded with self-adhesive resin cement (Gcem ONE) and scanned by Primescan (46.70 μm ± 3.80) compared to Trios 4 (47.79 μm ± 2.59) (p = 0.295). Paired-sample T tests showed significantly higher mean marginal gaps with Gcem ONE compared to Temp-bond for the total mean marginal gap when scanning with Primescan (p = 0.0005) or Trios 4 (p = 0.0005). In everyday dentistry, both closed systems (Primescan with Cerec) and open systems (Trios 4 with Exocad) can be used to achieve an acceptable (<120 µm) marginal gap for ZLS CELTRA® DUO single crowns. There is a significant difference between cementation with Temp-bond and Gcem ONE self-adhesive resin cement (p < 0.05). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of the in vitro study was to compare the internal merge and marginal perfection of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) crowns under a stereomicroscope. Methods: All-ceramic preparation is done on the maxillary first premolar which is mounted on the wax block which was scanned using 3Shape scanner and duplicated into 30 acrylic CAD/CAM dies (n = 15) for the placement of PEEK and PEKK crowns. The YENADENT milling system was used to fabricate 15 samples from Group A PEEK crowns and to fabricate 15 samples from Group B PEKK crowns. According to the manufacturer's instructions, an equal amount of the dual-cure resin luting agent (Rely X U200 Self-Adhesive resin, 3M, Germany) was dispensed on the mixing pad before being mixed with cement and painted on the internal surfaces of the copings with the finger pressure crowns which were luted. The values were then analyzed using one-way ANOVA (post hoc) followed by Dunnett's t-test. Results: Among those two groups, PEEK group materials showed the lowest mean value of (28.73.3 ± 4.01) for marginal fit and (26.72 ± 2.53) for internal gap, whereas PEKK group showed a mean value of (32.85 ± 4.63) and (33.06 ± 4.14), respectively. Conclusion: Among these two groups, comparatively less marginal fit and internal adaptation is seen in PEKK when compared to the PEEK crowns. While the marginal fit and internal adaptation of both PEEK and PEKK copings were in acceptable clinical range. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to investigate the marginal fit and bond strength characteristics of onlay restorations manufactured by three-dimensional printing (Varseo XS, Bego GmbH, Bremen, Germany) and CAD/CAM (CAMcube, Montreal, QC, Canada) systems. Class II onlay cavities on sixty mandibular molars were prepared in cavities and restored in three separate groups using different fabrication methods. Digital and conventional impressions were taken to design the restorations in the CAD system (DWOS, Straumann GmbH, Freiburg, Germany). To evaluate the marginal fit and void volumes, all specimens were scanned with microcomputed tomography. A microshear test was performed to compare the bond strength of the restorations to the tooth surface. The marginal fit values measured for the 3D-printed and CAD/CAM onlay restorations were found to be at clinically acceptable levels (<120 µm), and no significant difference could be observed between the three different fabrication methods (p > 0.05). According to the microshear test results, the CAD/CAM group had the highest bond strength values before (34.82 MPa) and after (26.87 MPa) thermal cycling (p < 0.05), while the 3D-printed and conventionally produced onlays had similar results (p < 0.05). 3D printing technology is a promising option for indirect restorations; however, the post-production phase is as crucial as the printing and cementation phases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the marginal fit of inlays fabricated using conventional and digital impression techniques through stereomicroscopic analysis. Methods: A total of 50 inlays were fabricated, with 25 in each group: conventional impression and digital impression. Marginal fit was assessed using a stereomicroscope at 20x magnification. Mean marginal gap measurements were recorded at predetermined locations (mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual), and statistical analysis was performed to compare the marginal fit between the two groups. Results: The digital impression group exhibited significantly smaller mean marginal gap measurements compared to the conventional impression group at all measured locations (p < 0.001). The mean marginal gap measurements ranged from 52.6 to 58.9 microns in the digital impression group and from 64.2 to 72.1 microns in the conventional impression group. Conclusion: In conclusion, digital impression techniques demonstrated superior marginal fit accuracy compared to conventional impression methods in the fabrication of inlays. These findings highlight the potential of digital technologies to enhance the precision and accuracy of dental restorations, ultimately improving clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study compared the influence of crystallization on marginal gap adaptation by using computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD-CAM) for producing monolithic zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) ceramic crowns. Methods: A total of 25 plastic teeth were scanned using a Primescan intra-oral scanner (IOS), and ZLS crowns were ground. For each unit (abutment and crown), the marginal gap was evaluated pre crystallization and post crystallization at four regions of interest through the use of a scanning electron microscope (SEM). To compare the marginal gap between the two groups, a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test performed on the study variables indicated a normal distribution (p > 0.05) followed by paired samples T-tests (α = 0.0005). Results: After crystallization, there were significantly higher circumferential marginal gaps (CMGs) for all four surfaces (distal (p = 0.0005), mesial (p = 0.0005), palatal (p = 0.0005), and buccal (p = 0.0005)). The total mean marginal gap (MMG) revealed a significantly higher result for the post-crystallization group (79.82 ± 7.86 μm) compared to the pre-crystallization group (24.25 ± 5.49 μm). Conclusions: The post-crystallization group showed a significantly higher marginal gap compared to the pre-crystallization group in all parameters, but both groups were in the clinically accepted threshold (<120 microns). In terms of the marginal gap, it is arguable whether to carry out post-crystallization for CELTRA® DUO crowns and achieve better mechanical properties but significantly increase the marginal gap. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Achieving optimal marginal fit is essential for the success of Virgilite Based Lithium Disilicate Ceramic crowns. Materials and Methods: In this in-vitro study, we compared the marginal fit of Virgilite Based Lithium Disilicate Ceramic crowns using two different CAD/CAM scanners, powder free (System A, Omnicam) and powder based (System B, Blue cam). Results: The mean marginal gap for System A was found to be 63.5 μm (standard deviation ± 10.2 μm), while for System B, it was 57.8 μm (standard deviation ± 9.8 μm). System B demonstrated a slightly superior marginal fit compared to System A, with a difference of 5.7 μm. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that both Omnicam and Blue cam produced clinically acceptable marginal fit of Virgilite Based Lithium Disilicate Ceramic crowns. However, Blue cam exhibited a slightly better marginal fit compared to Omnicam. Further clinical studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Background: In the realm of fixed prosthodontics, the transition from conventional to digital impressions has been a subject of ongoing debate. This study aims to provide a comparative analysis of digital versus conventional impressions in terms of accuracy and efficiency. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients requiring fixed prosthodontic treatment were selected for this study. Each patient received both digital and conventional impressions. The digital impressions were obtained using an intraoral scanner, while conventional impressions were taken using polyvinyl siloxane material. The impressions were then used to fabricate fixed prostheses for each patient. Accuracy was assessed through measurement of marginal fit using a standardized technique, and efficiency was evaluated based on time taken for impression procedures. Results: The mean marginal discrepancy for digital impressions was found to be 38 micrometers (±5), whereas for conventional impressions, it was 45 micrometers (±7). Additionally, the average time taken for digital impressions was 12 minutes, compared to 20 minutes for conventional impressions. Conclusion: Digital impressions demonstrated superior accuracy and efficiency compared to conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics.

Background/Aim: 3D printing technology has become increasingly prevalent in the field of dentistry. Research is ongoing regarding the usability of resin-based 3D printed temporary crowns in clinical applications. Marginal fit of 3D printed interim restorations produced from digital impressions obtained with intraoral scanners may vary according to the geometry and inclination of the axial walls of the abutment tooth. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal fit of 3D printed interim crowns fabricated over conventional and reverse-tapered preparations. Material and Methods: Crown preparations with known total occlusal convergence (TOC) angles (-8°,-4°, 0°, 8°, 12°, 16°, and 22°) were digitally created from a maxillary central incisor and printed in acrylic resin. Then, prepared tooth models (n=7) were scanned 10 times with an intraoral scanner (TRIOS3, 3Shape Inc, Denmark). Each experimental scan was used to design and fabricate a 3D printed interim anatomically contoured crown. Vinyl polyether silicone was used three times to assess the marginal discrepancy of the specimens by measuring five marginal points on digital photographs for each surfaces (buccal, mesial, distal, lingual). Marginal fit measured values did not follow a normal distribution; therefore, the Kruskal-Wallis and the Dunn/Bonferroni multiple comparison tests were applied (p = 0.05). Results: Marginal gap values were found significantly higher (p

Abstract Purpose of the study The goal behind this study is to answer the question “In tooth-supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs), does the digital impression techniques compared to fabrications using conventional impression methods improve the marginal and internal fit? Background The incorporation of digital technology in the fabrication of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) has accelerated over the past decade. This study is directed at evaluating the marginal and internal fit of FPDs manufactured using digital approaches compared to conventional techniques. The need for updated data has encouraged this review. Materials and methods An electronic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Grey Database to identify relevant studies. The Modified Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess the risk of bias in in vitro experiments. The key results of this meta-analysis were the standard mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each main variance, marginal fit, and internal fit between the digital and conventional techniques. Additional analyses were performed to assess the significance of three subgroup parameters: method of digitalization, cement spacer thickness, and span length, and their influence on the fit of the FPDs. Results Based on predefined criteria, of the seven articles included in this systematic review, only five were selected for the quantitative data analysis. The marginal fit results were (P = 0.06; SMD: -1.88; 95% CI: − 3.88, 0.11) (P > 0.05) and the internal fit results were (P = 0.02; SMD: -0.80; 95% CI: − 1.49, − 0.10) (P

Background The coming era will be governed by technology. Computer aided designing (CAD) & computer aided manufacturing (CAM) dentistry is taking over the conventional dental practice establishing a benchmark in esthetics, quality and fit of the prosthesis. The fabrication of prosthesis by digital methods reduces the efforts in fabrication and time required for designing the prosthesis. Aim This protocol aims at checking the marginal fit, internal fit and cement space of lithium disilicate crowns by comparing the two different methods of fabrication. To evaluate and compare marginal fit, internal fit and cement space of single unit “lithium disilicate crown” with shoulder finish line with two different methods of fabrication. Methods The current study is the experimental study conducted at Sharad Pawar dental college and Hospital. The protocol has been approved by the Ethical institutional committee with ref.no.DMIHER(DU)/IEC/2023/851. All the 54 participants who will visit the O.P.D of department of prosthodontics crown & bridge will be included in the study which will be conducted over a period of two years, the subjects will be informed about the research and written consent will be taken. The inclusion criteria for this study are patients aged 18-54 years in the need of full veneer maxillary incisors crown prosthesis. All the comparative results will be calculated with the help of stereomicroscope and descriptive statistics will be performed. Expected results The expected outcome or result proposed will be, the crown fabricated with CAD-CAM will give good fit compared to pressed method. Conclusions Finding the accuracy in the fit and cement space of lithium disilicate crowns by conventional and digital method of fabrication will help the prosthodontist to deliver good results.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of pre-ceramic soldering on the marginal and internal fit of 4-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses (FPDs) that have two abutments and two pontics. 4-unit zirconia frameworks (Zirkonzahn ICE Translucent) (Z Group) and monolithic zirconia (Zirkonzahn Prettau) (M Group) FPDs were manufactured. Groups were divided into two groups (n = 10) control (ZC and MC) and soldering (ZS and MS). Samples of ZS and MS groups were cut into two pieces under cooling water and soldered with a bonding material (DCM Zircon HotBond). The marginal and internal fit of the restorations were measured from 36 points of each sample and cement space volume was calculated using reverse engineering software (Geomagic Design X). The mean and standard deviations were submitted to Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) analysis (α = 0.05). Statistical differences between groups before and after pre-ceramic soldering on point measurements were found. In total cement spacing measurements, a significant difference was found amongst all groups (P < 0.05). However, in premolars, a statistically significant difference was found between ZC and ZS groups and MC and MS groups (P < 0.05). All discrepancies after pre-ceramic soldering were found to be lower than before. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In-vitro data from a clinically well-known lithium disilicate ceramic reference was used to assess the expected performance of resin-based materials in implant dentistry. The purpose of the study was to compare the bond strength and marginal adaptation of nano-ceramic hybrid composite crowns cemented to stock cement-retained abutments to lithium disilicate crowns. Methods: Twenty abutment analogs were embedded into auto-polymerizing acrylic resin blocks. The blocks were divided into 2 groups according to the restorative crown material. The 2 groups were divided as follows: Resin nano-ceramic group and lithium disilicate group. Abutment analogs in both groups were scanned using a laboratory scanner, and the restorations were designed, manufactured, and cemented with resin cement over the corresponding group. All samples were tested for marginal adaptation and bond strength after storage for 24 hours at 37 °C in 100% humidity. Data were collected, tabulated, and statistically analysed using the appropriate tests. Normality was checked using Shapiro Wilk test and Q-Q plots. Data were normally distributed. Variables were presented using mean, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) and standard deviation in addition to median and Inter Quartile Range (IQR). Differences between groups regarding debonding forces was assessed using independent t test. Two Way ANOVA was performed to assess the effect of material and bonding on marginal gap. All tests were two tailed and p value was set at < 0.05. Results: Marginal gap and debonding force values were significantly different according to the type of material used (P <.05). Resin nano-ceramic crowns presented lower marginal gap values before (20.80 ± 8.87 μm) and after (52.11 ± 22.92 μm) bonding than lithium disilicate crowns. The debonding force value for resin nano-ceramic crowns (284.30 ± 26.44 N) was significantly higher than that for lithium disilicate crowns (253.30 ± 33.26 N). Adhesive failure mode was detected in all the specimens in both groups. Conclusions: The type of material used for implant-supported cement-retained crowns had a statistically significant effect on marginal adaptation and bond strength. Resin nano-ceramic implant-supported cement-retained crowns had better marginal adaptation and higher bond strength than those manufactured using lithium disilicate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of the study: The goal behind this study is to answer the question "In tooth-supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs), does the digital impression techniques compared to fabrications using conventional impression methods improve the marginal and internal fit? Background: The incorporation of digital technology in the fabrication of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) has accelerated over the past decade. This study is directed at evaluating the marginal and internal fit of FPDs manufactured using digital approaches compared to conventional techniques. The need for updated data has encouraged this review. Materials and methods: An electronic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Grey Database to identify relevant studies. The Modified Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess the risk of bias in in vitro experiments. The key results of this meta-analysis were the standard mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each main variance, marginal fit, and internal fit between the digital and conventional techniques. Additional analyses were performed to assess the significance of three subgroup parameters: method of digitalization, cement spacer thickness, and span length, and their influence on the fit of the FPDs. Results: Based on predefined criteria, of the seven articles included in this systematic review, only five were selected for the quantitative data analysis. The marginal fit results were (P = 0.06; SMD: -1.88; 95% CI: − 3.88, 0.11) (P > 0.05) and the internal fit results were (P = 0.02; SMD: -0.80; 95% CI: − 1.49, − 0.10) (P < 0.05). Regarding the subgroup analyses, the method of digitalization subgroup results were (P = 0.35; SMD: -1.89; 95% CI: − 3.89, 0.11) and (P = 0.80; SMD: -0.80; 95% CI: − 1.49, − 0.11) for marginal and internal fit, respectively. The span length results were (P = 0.10; SMD: -1.89; 95% CI: − 3.89, 0.11) for marginal fit and (P = 0.02; SMD: -0.80; 95% CI: − 1.49, − 0.11) for internal fit. The cement spacer thickness (P = 0.01; SMD: -1.89; 95% CI: − 3.89, 0.11) and (P = 0.04; SMD: -0.80; 95% CI: − 1.49, − 0.11) for marginal and internal fit, respectively. Conclusion: Tooth-retained fixed partial dentures FPDs produced by digital scanning and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems can significantly enhance the internal fit compared with those manufactured by traditional methods. Intraoral scanners can replace conventional impressions for the fabrication of FPDs because they minimize the operating time and reduce patient pain. Further clinical studies are required to obtain more conclusive results. Systematic review registration: This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), registration number CRD42021261397. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Over the past two decades, dental ceramics have experienced rapid advances in science and technology, becoming the fastest-growing field of dental materials. This review emphasizes the significant impact of translucent zirconia in fixed prosthodontics, merging aesthetics with strength, and highlights its versatility from single crowns to complex bridgework facilitated by digital manufacturing advancements. The unique light-conducting properties of translucent zirconia offer a natural dental appearance, though with considerations regarding strength trade-offs compared to its traditional, opaque counterpart. The analysis extends to the mechanical attributes of the material, noting its commendable fracture resistance and durability, even under simulated physiological conditions. Various zirconia types (3Y-TZP, 4Y-TZP, 5Y-TZP) display a range of strengths influenced by factors like yttria content and manufacturing processes. The study also explores adhesive strategies, underlining the importance of surface treatments and modern adhesives in achieving long-lasting bonds. In the realm of implant-supported restorations, translucent zirconia stands out for its precision, reliability, and aesthetic adaptability, proving suitable for comprehensive dental restorations. Despite its established benefits, the review calls for ongoing research to further refine the material's properties and adhesive protocols and to solidify its applicability through long-term clinical evaluations, ensuring its sustainable future in dental restorative applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the aging process on the marginal fit and fracture resistance of temporary crowns prepared using different materials. Materials and method: The steel die to represent the maxillary first premolar used in this study was produced on a CNC turning machine to include an anatomical occlusal surface. A total of 160 epoxy resin dies were obtained by taking impressions with conventional impression methods on the metal die. Epoxy resin dies were randomly divided into four groups. Temporary crowns were prepared for each group from poly acrylic resin (Vita CADTemp®), bis-acryl composite resin (Protemp 4), poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA; Imident) and poly ethyl methacrylate (PEMA; Dentalon Plus) restorative materials. Half of the specimens (n = 20) in each group (n = 40) were randomly separated and the aging process was applied 5000 times in the device. Marginal gap measurements on epoxy resin dies were made using a stereomicroscope. The fracture strength test of the specimens was performed by using the Instron Universal Test Device. Jamovi 2.2.5 statistical program was used for statistical analysis. Results: When compared to temporary crowns prepared from all other materials, poly acrylic resin (Vita CADTemp ®) temporary crowns observed significantly lower marginal gap values (59,05 μm) regardless of the aging process, and a significantly higher fracture resistance (478,44 N) in the presence of aging process (p

Abstract Background In clinical practice, control of the marginal fit of fixed dental prostheses is hindered by evaluation method, which needs to be further improved to increase its clinical applicability. This study aimed to quantitatively analyze the absolute marginal discrepancy of three-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses fabricated by conventional and digital technologies using a digital measurement method based on the digital impression technology and open source software. Methods A digital workflow and the conventional impression combined with the lost-wax heat-pressed technique were adopted to separately fabricate 10 glass ceramic fixed dental prostheses. Three-dimensional data for the abutments, fixed dental prostheses, and fixed dental prostheses seated on the abutments, were obtained using a dental scanner. The two datasets were aligned using registration technology, specifically “multi-points registration” and “best fit alignment,” by reverse engineering software. Subsequently, the three-dimensional seated fit between the fixed dental prostheses and abutments were reconstructed. The margin of the abutment and crown was extracted using edge-sharpening and other functional modules, and the absolute marginal discrepancy was measured by the distance between the margin of the abutment and crown. One-way analysis of variance was used to statistically analyze the measurement results. Results Using the digital measurement method, the mean value of absolute marginal discrepancy for fixed dental prostheses fabricated by the conventional method was 106.69 ± 6.46 μm, and that fabricated by the digital workflow was 102.55 ± 6.96 μm. The difference in the absolute marginal discrepancy of three-unit all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses fabricated using the two methods was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions The digital measurement method for absolute marginal discrepancy was preliminarily established based on open source software and applied in three-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses. The absolute marginal discrepancy of three-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses fabricated using digital technology was comparable to that of conventional technique.

Background. Polymer composites have good aesthetic characteristics and pronounced physicochemical properties, as compared to traditional restorative materials such as amalgam. However, the polymerization reaction of composite material containing bismethacrylate group commonly used in clinical practice is always accompanied by a different degree of volumetric shrinkage (2.7%~7.1%). The resulting stress can lead to adhesion failure and some other unfavorable clinical consequences, such as enamel destruction, microcracking of composite material and formation of microleakage between composite and tooth cavity wall, which can result in recurrent caries and postoperative sensitivity, thereby affecting the long-term effect of restoration. Therefore, studying the effect of preheating on composite restoration is important for its clinical application. Objective. To improve the effectiveness of treatment of patients with dental caries by improving the physicochemical properties of composite restorations.Methods. A randomized clinical trial enrolled 180 patients aged 18 to 45 years, diagnosed with dentin caries class I, according to Black (K02.1 in ICD). The study was conducted in the Dental Clinic of Kuban State Medical University, Russia. 180 composite restorations were performed in the treatment of dentin caries of molars. Patients were randomized into 2 groups): the control group — 90 patients and the main group — 90 patients. The control and main groups, in turn, were divided into three subgroups, depending on the composite used — Estelite Sigma Quick (Tokuyama Dental, Japan), Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative (3M Espe, USA) and DentLight (VladMiVa, Russia). Each subgroup consisted of 30 patients. In the control group, the classical method of filling with a composite material at “room temperature” was applied. In the main group, a composite heating conditioner “Ena Heat” (Micerium, Italy) was used to heat the composite to 55 °C before adapting the material in the formed cavity with subsequent photopolymerization. The quality of composite restorations within the clinical study was evaluated using the modified Ryge criterion immediately after treatment and after 6, 12, 18, 24 months. Statistical processing of the obtained data was carried out by means of one-factor analysis of variance using the GraphPadPrism 9 program (GraphPad Software, USA).Results. The duration of the clinical study comprised 24 months. The study revealed a statistically significant decrease in the quality of marginal fit of composite restorations (according to the Ryge score) by 20.1% (p = 0.0001) in the control group and by 5.7% (p = 0.0328) in the main group. At the same time, no statistically significant changes in Ryge scores were reported in the subgroups of composite materials of the main group (pF = 0.9480, pE = 0.1837, pD = 0.2529). As a result of the study, an optimal time algorithm (7 seconds) for using a special furnace for preheating the composite before sealing with subsequent photopolymerization was obtained.Conclusion. The study revealed a statistically significant positive effect of the proposed algorithm for working with a heated composite on the quality of marginal fit in the long term after treatment in comparison with the classical method of working with a composite at “room temperature”.

Statement of the problem: Different CAD software programs used for designing crowns show variations in marginal and internal fit. Marginal and internal discrepancies may cause poorly fitting crowns. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the marginal and internal fit of single crown temporary restorations designed using three different CAD software programs. Materials and methods: Dentbird, Exocad and Inlab 20 were used to design temporary single crowns using the same cement gap. Three experimental groups (n = 10/group) were formed based on the CAD software used. Geomagic Control X three-dimensional analysis software was used to compare the marginal and internal fit among the groups. Measurements were obtained at nine different thickness points. IBM SPSS Statistics, version 22 was used for all statistical analyses. Results: Among the CAD software programs tested, Dentbird produced the best internal fit on the buccal surface and the best marginal fit on both buccal and mesial surfaces. Exocad achieved the best values on the distal surface for both internal and marginal fit, while Inlab showed the best values on the mesial surface for internal fit and on the palatal surface for marginal fit. Conclusions: The Dentbird CAD software program provided the most accurate fit values that closely matched the design. The marginal and internal fit oftemporary crowns may vary depending on the CAD software used.

Background: The coming era will be governed by technology. Computer aided designing (CAD) & computer aided manufacturing (CAM) dentistry is taking over the conventional dental practice establishing a benchmark in esthetics, quality and fit of the prosthesis. The fabrication of prosthesis by digital methods reduces the efforts in fabrication and time required for designing the prosthesis. Aim: This protocol aims at checking the marginal fit, internal fit and cement space of lithium disilicate crowns by comparing the two different methods of fabrication. To evaluate and compare marginal fit, internal fit and cement space of single unit “lithium disilicate crown” with shoulder finish line with two different methods of fabrication. Methods: The current study is the experimental study conducted at Sharad Pawar dental college and Hospital. The protocol has been approved by the Ethical institutional committee with ref.no.DMIHER(DU)/IEC/2023/851. All the 54 participants who will visit the O.P.D of department of prosthodontics crown & bridge will be included in the study which will be conducted over a period of two years, the subjects will be informed about the research and written consent will be taken. The inclusion criteria for this study are patients aged 18-54 years in the need of full veneer 1 st molar prosthesis. All the comparative results will be calculated with the help of stereomicroscope and descriptive statistics will be performed. Expected results: The expected outcome or result proposed will be, the crown fabricated with CAD-CAM will give good fit compared to pressed method. Conclusions: Finding the accuracy in the fit and cement space of lithium disilicate crowns by conventional and digital method of fabrication will help the prosthodontist to deliver good results.

The marginal accuracy of fit between prosthetic restorations and abutment teeth represents an essential aspect with regard to long-term clinical success. Since the final gap is also influenced by the luting techniques and materials applied, this study analyzed the accuracy of the fit of single-tooth zirconia copings before and after cementation using different luting materials. Forty plaster dies with a corresponding zirconia coping were manufactured based on a single tooth chamfer preparation. The copings were luted on the plaster dies (n = 10 per luting material) with a zinc phosphate (A), glass–ionomer (B), self-adhesive resin (C), or resin-modified glass–ionomer cement (D). The accuracy of fit for each coping was assessed using a non-destructive digital method. Intragroup statistical analysis was conducted using Wilcoxon signed rank tests and intergroup analysis by Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests (α = 0.05). Accuracy of fit was significantly different before/after cementation within A (0.033/0.110 µm) and B (0.035/0.118 µm; p = 0.002). A had a significantly increased marginal gap compared to C and D, and B compared to C and D (p ≤ 0.001). Significantly increased vertical discrepancies between A and B versus C and D (p < 0.001) were assessed. Of the materials under investigation, the zinc phosphate cement led to increased vertical marginal discrepancies, whereas the self-adhesive resin cement did not influence the restoration fit.

Background: This study compared the influence of crystallization on marginal gap adaptation by using computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD-CAM) for producing monolithic zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) ceramic crowns. Methods: A total of 25 plastic teeth were scanned using a Primescan intra-oral scanner (IOS), and ZLS crowns were ground. For each unit (abutment and crown), the marginal gap was evaluated pre crystallization and post crystallization at four regions of interest through the use of a scanning electron microscope (SEM). To compare the marginal gap between the two groups, a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test performed on the study variables indicated a normal distribution (p > 0.05) followed by paired samples T-tests (α = 0.0005). Results: After crystallization, there were significantly higher circumferential marginal gaps (CMGs) for all four surfaces (distal (p = 0.0005), mesial (p = 0.0005), palatal (p = 0.0005), and buccal (p = 0.0005)). The total mean marginal gap (MMG) revealed a significantly higher result for the post-crystallization group (79.82 ± 7.86 μm) compared to the pre-crystallization group (24.25 ± 5.49 μm). Conclusions: The post-crystallization group showed a significantly higher marginal gap compared to the pre-crystallization group in all parameters, but both groups were in the clinically accepted threshold (® DUO crowns and achieve better mechanical properties but significantly increase the marginal gap.

Background: Different methods are used for the analysis of marginal and internal fit of partial crowns, but not all of them are applicable for in vivo studies. The aim of this review is to search the available methods, described in the current literature, to assess marginal and internal fit in partial crowns. Methods: an electronic search was performed on Pubmed and Web of Science databases to find studies published from 1 January 2017 up to 2 March 2023, following PRISMA guidelines and Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews. The search strategy applied was: "(marginal) AND (fit OR gap OR adaptation OR discrepancy) AND (inlay OR onlay OR partial crown)". In vitro studies which evaluated marginal and internal fit on CAD CAM or 3D printed partial crowns were included in this review. Quality of the studies was assessed by using Quality Assessment Tool For In Vitro Studies (QUIN tool). Results: 22 studies were included. Among conventional methods, direct view with microscope, indirect view on resin replicas, and silicone replica technique (SRT) were used. Considering new digital methods, micro-CT, SRT 3D and triple scan technique (TST) were applied. Conclusions: Among 2D methods, direct view technique is the most used marginal fit analysis. For a more comprehensive evaluation, a 3D digital analysis is suggested. SRT and indirect view are the only 2D methods available for in vivo analysis. A protocol for the application of TST for assessment in vivo is now available, but no studies are reported in literature yet. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the effect of CAD‐CAM technique (monolithic, CAD‐on, or CAD‐on cemented) and thermomechanical fatigue on the marginal discrepancy and fracture load of ceramic crowns. Material and methods: A total of 90 brass master dies were fabricated to investigate marginal adaptation and fracture load. A mandibular first molar crown's median measurements were loaded into CAD software and divided into 2 crown design groups: Monolithic (M)(IPS e.max zirCAD)(n = 30) or CAD‐on core (IPS e.max zirCAD) and lithium disilicate veneer (IPS e.max CAD) (n = 60). The crowns and cores were milled, seated on their respective dies, and marginal discrepancy values were measured by using microcomputed tomography. After veneers were milled, the cores in the veneer groups were divided into 2 groups; veneers bonded with fusion glass‐ceramic (IPS e.max CAD Crystal) in CAD‐on group (CO) and CAD‐on cemented group (CO‐C) where veneers were cemented (RelyX U200) onto cores (CO‐C). The marginal discrepancy measurements were remade and the crowns were subjected to thermomechanical fatigue (TMF) by using a chewing simulator and thermocycling (5‐55°C, 1,200,000 cycles). Marginal discrepancy measurements were repeated and the crowns were subjected to fracture load test by using a universal test device. Data were analyzed statistically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's honestly significant difference test (α = 0.05). Results: All crown groups had similar marginal discrepancy before veneering. Veneering and cementation on die increased the marginal discrepancy of crowns in cemented CAD‐on group. Thermomechanical fatigue increased the marginal discrepancy of both CAD‐on groups. Monolithic crown group had the lowest marginal discrepancy after thermomechanical fatigue (p < 0.001), and the highest fracture load (p < 0.001) Conclusions: Fabrication technique affected the marginal fit and fracture load of CAD‐CAM crowns after thermomechanical fatigue. All crowns survived the thermomechanical fatigue test without dislodgement or fracture. Monolithic crowns had the best fit and highest fracture load after fatigue testing. The CAD‐on systems had similar marginal discrepancies, and static loading reproduced veneer chipping. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The marginal fit of any dental restoration is vital to its long-term success. Lack of adequate fit is potentially detrimental to both the tooth and the supporting periodontal tissues. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the marginal fit of monolithic zirconia, monolithic lithium disilicate and monolithic metal crowns and compare the three groups. Methods: The study was conducted by fabricating ten samples for each group, total of 30 samples. A premolar stainless steel die was used to standardize the preparation. PVS putty material was used to make impressions of the model and was poured using type IV die stone. The samples were all fabricated using CAD-CAM. The marginal gap was measured by SEM, and the results were analysed using SPSS software. Results: The mean marginal gap of zirconia, metal and lithium disilicate crowns was 79.49 μm, 46.83 μm and 70.79 μm, respectively. Discussion: The metal group showed the lowest marginal gap among the groups. This difference in marginal fit is due to the sintering process where the organic binders in soft metal burn out and the metallic powder particles are being sintered (caked) without creating a fused phase. Clinical Significance: Marginal fit plays a very important role in the long-term success of a crown. Discrepancy in marginal fit results in food and plaque accumulation causing caries and periodontal breakdown, eventuating the failure of the restoration. A perfect marginal fit would enhance the longevity of any indirect restoration. Knowledge about which indirect restoration has the best marginal fit is critical.

Objectives: Few studies have evaluated the marginal fit of computer-aided design—computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated through completely digital workflow; however, the internal fit of these restorations is not well known. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using digital workflow, including intraoral scanner (IOS) scans, and compare the results to those of a semi-digital workflow, which combined conventional impressions, poured casts, and extraoral scanner (EOS) scanning. Materials and methods: A typodont right mandibular first molar was prepared for a complete-coverage ceramic crown and scanned using an IOS. The conventional impressions of the preparation were also made, and stone casts were poured and scanned by using an EOS. Virtual models were generated for both workflows, and identical virtual anatomic contour crowns were designed using CAD software. Monolithic zirconia crowns were fabricated for both IOS (ZI; n = 10) and EOS (ZE; n = 10) groups. The silicon replica technique was used to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of the crowns. Measurements were made at 13 points on buccolingual and mesiodistal cross-sections per specimen with a ×6.5 to ×50 zoom stereo microscope. The results from both groups were statistically compared using the Independent Samples t-tests and the Mann–Whitney U test (α = 0.05). Results: Mean gap values at all measurement locations for ZE were significantly higher than those for ZI (p ≤ 0.002). Overall mean values ranged between 29 and 43 µm (median: 28–42 µm) for ZI and 42 and 75 µm (median: 43–77 µm) for ZE. Conclusion: Completely digital workflow through intraoral scans provided significantly better marginal and internal fit for CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns compared with the semi-digital workflow, where stone casts obtained from conventional impressions were scanned with an EOS. Yet, both workflows provided an acceptable marginal and internal fit for CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia molar crowns (

Abstract Background The accuracy of impression techniques determines the marginal fit of fixed prostheses. Marginal accuracy plays a main role in the success and failure of treatments. This in-vivo study evaluated the marginal fit of anterior three-unit monolithic zirconia fixed partial dentures (FPDs) using conventional and scannable polyvinyl siloxane impression materials. Methods Ten patients were selected to replace the lateral teeth with a three-unit monolithic zirconia bridge. For each patient, in the first group, an impression was made with a two-step putty-wash technique using scannable polyvinyl siloxane material (BONASCAN; DMP, Greece). In the identical session, as the second group, an impression of conventional putty-wash polyvinyl siloxane was taken (BONASIL A+ Putty; DMP, Greece). The marginal discrepancy was measured through the replicas, which were cut perpendicularly within the buccolingual and mesiodistal directions. An Independent t-test was employed for data analyses (P 0.05). Also, the marginal discrepancy for canine abutment in the conventional method was higher than in the scannable method, but it was not significant, either (P > 0.05). Conclusions FPDs fabricated from both scannable and conventional impression materials were not superior to each other in marginal fit for both central and canine abutments by evaluation using the replica technique.

Introduction: Marginal and internal fit of a metal crown are very important for a successful metal crown prosthesis. This study will evaluate the marginal and internal fit of metal crowns produced from wax patterns that are formed by two different wax pattern fabrication procedures: conventional wax pattern fabrication and wax pattern milled using the computer-aided design and manufacture (CAD CAM) method. Objectives: To evaluate the marginal and internal fit of metal crowns over prepared tooth made from wax patterns made by conventional technique and CAD CAM technique. Methodology: A total of 21 participants with endodontically restored mandibular first molar will be selected. Two all-metal crowns will be made for each participant, thus 42 metal crowns in total will be made. These 42 metal crowns will be divided into two groups based on the method used to create wax patterns: metal crowns made using conventional hand-carved wax pattern technique (Group I, n=21) and metal crowns made using CAD CAM-milled wax pattern technique (Group II, n=21). Then, the marginal and internal fit of metal crowns from both groups will be compared. Expected results: It is expected that metal crowns made by CAD CAM milled wax pattern fabrication method will have better marginal and internal fit than those of conventional method. Conclusions: The clinical acceptability and success of the dental crown will be assessed by this study. Minimal marginal gap and better internal fit of all metal crown are key qualities.

Statement of the Problem: Increasing the sintering temperature is suggested by some manufacturers as a way to enhance the translucency of monolithic zirconia crowns. Meanwhile, its effect on the marginal fit and compressive strength of the restoration is not fully understood. Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of sintering temperature on the marginal fit and compressive strength of monolithic zirconia crowns.Materials and Method: In this in vitro study, thirty crowns of pre-sintered monolithic zirconia were milled and sintered in a special furnace at either 1450°C or 1550°C (n=15 per group). The marginal gaps were measured at 18 spots on the dies with a digital microscope. To evaluate the compressive strength, the specimens were cemented on brass dies by using conventional glass ionomer cement. Vertical load was applied by a universal testing machine until fracture. One-way ANOVA test was used to analyze the results (α=0.05).Results: The marginal gap was not significantly different between the two groups (p= 0.062). A significantly higher mean value of compressive strength was observed in crowns sintered at 1550°c (1988.27±635.09 N) than those sintered at 1450 °c (1514.27±455.11 N) (p= 0.026).Conclusion: Although increasing the sintering temperature would not affect the marginal gap of monolithic zirconia crowns, it could significantly improve the compressive strength of zirconia restorations.

Introduction: The marginal fit of any dental restoration is vital to its long‑term success. Lack of adequate fit is potentially detrimental to both the tooth and the supporting periodontal tissues. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the marginal fit of monolithic zirconia, monolithic lithium disilicate and monolithic metal crowns and compare the three groups. Methods: The study was conducted by fabricating ten samples for each group, total of 30 samples. A premolar stainless steel die was used to standardize the preparation. PVS putty material was used to make impressions of the model and was poured using type IV die stone. The samples were all fabricated using CAD‑CAM. The marginal gap was measured by SEM, and the results were analysed using SPSS software. Results: The mean marginal gap of zirconia, metal and lithium disilicate crowns was 79.49 μm, 46.83 μm and 70.79 μm, respectively. Discussion: The metal group showed the lowest marginal gap among the groups. This difference in marginal fit is due to the sintering process where the organic binders in soft metal burn out and the metallic powder particles are being sintered (caked) without creating a fused phase. Clinical Significance: Marginal fit plays a very important role in the long‑term success of a crown. Discrepancy in marginal fit results in food and plaque accumulation causing caries and periodontal breakdown, eventuating the failure of the restoration. A perfect marginal fit would enhance the longevity of any indirect restoration. Knowledge about which indirect restoration has the best marginal fit is critical. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study investigated the marginal and internal fit and retention of crowns fabricated using 4 different castable pattern production methods, namely plastic burn out coping, computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) milled (CAD-CAM-M), CAD-CAM additive (CAD-CAM-A), and conventional. This study consisted of 5 groups including 2 different brands of burn out coping groups (Burn out-Straumann [Burn out-S] group and Burn out-Implance [Burn out-I] group), the CAD-CAM-M group, the CAD-CAM-A group, and the conventional group. A total of 50 metal crown copings were produced in each group with 10 metal crown copings. The marginal gap of the specimens was measured twice—both before and after the cementation and thermocycling processes using a stereomicroscope. A total of 5 specimens were selected randomly—1 from each group for scanning electron microscopy analysis and sectioned longitudinally. The pull-out test was performed on the remaining 45 specimens. The lowest marginal gap value was observed in the Burn out-S group before and after cementation with 88.54–97.48 μm, respectively, while the highest marginal gap was observed in the conventional group (186.27–200.58 μm). Implant systems did not significantly affect the marginal gap values (P >.05). Marginal gap values increased significantly after cementation and thermal cycling in all the groups (P <.0001). The highest retention value was measured in the Burn out-S group while the lowest in the CAD-CAM-A group. The highest occlusal cement gap values were observed in the coping groups (Burn out-S and Burn out-I groups), and the lowest in the conventional group in the scanning electron microscopy analysis. The marginal fit and retention values of the prefabricated plastic burn out coping technique was superior when compared with the other techniques, providing that internal fit was superior with the conventional technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The long-term success of ceramic laminate veneers (CLVs) is influenced by the marginal and internal fit of the restorations. However, studies comparing the fit of CLVs using different intraoral scanners or the indirect digitization technique are lacking. The purpose of this study was therefore to assess the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-milled CLVs using different intraoral scanners and the indirect digitalization technique. An ivorine typodont maxillary left-central incisor was prepared; the tooth and the neighboring teeth were scanned and used as a template to print ninety 3D partial models. Thereafter, ceramic laminate veneers (CLVs) (N = 90) were milled from IPS-Emax CAD blocks and divided into six equal groups (15 specimens each) according to the type of intraoral scanner (IOS), as follows: Omnicam IOS, SC3600 IOS, Trios 3 IOS, Emerald IOS, I500 IOS. Fifteen further CLVs were fabricated using the conventional indirect digitalization technique. After cementation on the resin dies and embedding in clear epoxy resin, specimens were sectioned inciso-gingivally and mesio-distally. At the incisal and cervical positions, the marginal discrepancy was measured and evaluated in addition to the internal gap at six locations using SEM (200×). Differences between gap measurements among the six groups were determined using ANOVA. Games–Howell multiple comparisons for homogenous variances and LSD multiple comparisons for non-homogenous variances were used with 95% confidence intervals. The significance level was set at 0.05. The lowest mean absolute marginal gap at the incisal margins (AMGI) was recorded for Omnicam group (203.28 ± 80.14) µm, while the highest mean absolute marginal gap at the cervical margins (AMGC) was recorded for Omnicam group (147.16 ± 59.78) µm. The mean AMGC was reported to be significantly different between the conventional technique (146.75 ± 38.43) µm and Trios 3 (91.86 ± (35.51) µm; p = 0.001) and between Emerald (112.37 ± (50.31) µm; p = 0.042) and I500 (86.95 ± (41.55) µm; p < 0.001). The mean MGI was found to be significantly different between the conventional technique (114.11 ± (43.45) µm and I500 group (186.99 ± (73.84) µm) only (p = 0.035). However, no significant differences were found in the mean MGI between all types of IOSs. The means of AMG and MG were significantly different at incisal or cervical areas between the conventional technique and IOSs and within the scanner groups (p > 0.05). Marginal gaps were higher in the incisal region compared to the cervical region with both the indirect digitization technique and the IOSs. Ceramic laminate veneers (CLVs) fabricated using IOSs produced overall internal and marginal fit adaptation results comparable to CLVs fabricated from the indirect digitalization method, and both techniques produced clinically acceptable results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of endo-crown restorations produced from different resin-matrix ceramics (RMS) and the effects of these materials on marginal adaptation and fracture resistance. Three frasaco models were used by preparing (first) premolar teeth in three different margin preparations: butt-joint, heavy chamfer and shoulder. Each group was further divided into four subgroups according to the type of restorative material used: Ambarino High Class (AHC), Voco Grandio (VG), Brilliant Crios (BC) and Shofu (S) (n = 30). Master models were obtained using an extraoral scanner and fabricated with a milling machine. Marginal gap evaluation was performed with a silicon replica technique using a stereomicroscope. Replicas of the models (n = 120) were produced with epoxy resin. The fracture resistance of the restorations was recorded using a universal testing machine. The data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA, and a t-test was applied for each group. Tukey's post-hoc test was performed to compare significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). The highest marginal gap was observed in VG, and the best marginal adaptation and the highest fracture resistance were found in BC. The lowest fracture resistance in Butt-joint preparation design was found in S. In addition, the lowest fracture resistance value in the heavy chamfer preparation design was found in AHC. The heavy shoulder preparation design displayed the highest fracture resistance values for all materials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Few studies have evaluated the marginal fit of computer-aided design—computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated through completely digital workflow; however, the internal fit of these restorations is not well known. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using digital workflow, including intraoral scanner (IOS) scans, and compare the results to those of a semi-digital workflow, which combined conventional impressions, poured casts, and extraoral scanner (EOS) scanning. Materials and methods: A typodont right mandibular first molar was prepared for a complete-coverage ceramic crown and scanned using an IOS. The conventional impressions of the preparation were also made, and stone casts were poured and scanned by using an EOS. Virtual models were generated for both workflows, and identical virtual anatomic contour crowns were designed using CAD software. Monolithic zirconia crowns were fabricated for both IOS (ZI; n = 10) and EOS (ZE; n = 10) groups. The silicon replica technique was used to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of the crowns. Measurements were made at 13 points on buccolingual and mesiodistal cross-sections per specimen with a ×6.5 to ×50 zoom stereo microscope. The results from both groups were statistically compared using the Independent Samples t-tests and the Mann–Whitney U test (α = 0.05). Results: Mean gap values at all measurement locations for ZE were significantly higher than those for ZI (p ≤ 0.002). Overall mean values ranged between 29 and 43 µm (median: 28–42 µm) for ZI and 42 and 75 µm (median: 43–77 µm) for ZE. Conclusion: Completely digital workflow through intraoral scans provided significantly better marginal and internal fit for CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns compared with the semi-digital workflow, where stone casts obtained from conventional impressions were scanned with an EOS. Yet, both workflows provided an acceptable marginal and internal fit for CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia molar crowns (<120 µm). Clinical Relevance: Completely digital workflow using IOS scans may be advantageous for the fabrication of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns as favorable results can be obtained with less material waste and potentially shortened overall treatment time as the impression files can be transferred to the production facility electronically. The results need to be corroborated with clinical studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: A range of materials for single-tooth computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) restorations have been introduced that may affect CAM accuracy. This study aimed to review articles evaluating marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate (LD) and zirconia (Z) crowns fabricated by CAD-CAM systems using intraoral optical scanners (IOS). Materials and methods: Under the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA), a systematic review was performed along with an electronic article search in the Medline/Pubmed database. The articles were limited to those in the English language that were published within the past ten years. Results: The initial search resulted in 50 articles and of those, a total of 18 articles were selected for full-text review following abstract evaluation. Eight articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded and the remaining ten articles, which provided internal and marginal gap values, were used in this review. For LD crowns, marginal gap values ranged between 45µm and 190.2µm. For Z crowns, the values varied between 39µm and 126.4µm. For LD crowns, the internal gap values were between 57.8µm and 475.4µm, and for Z crowns, the values were between 79µm and 205.8µm. Conclusion: The outcome of this review suggests that clinically acceptable marginal and internal fit can be attained with LD and Z all-ceramic CAD-CAM crowns using digital impressions. Additionally, it has been found that LD and Z ceramics provide similar marginal gap values, but LD material provides better internal fit than Z. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to investigate the marginal fit and bond strength characteristics of onlay restorations manufactured by three-dimensional printing (Varseo XS, Bego GmbH, Bremen, Germany) and CAD/CAM (CAMcube, Montreal, QC, Canada) systems. Class II onlay cavities on sixty mandibular molars were prepared in cavities and restored in three separate groups using different fabrication methods. Digital and conventional impressions were taken to design the restorations in the CAD system (DWOS, Straumann GmbH, Freiburg, Germany). To evaluate the marginal fit and void volumes, all specimens were scanned with microcomputed tomography. A microshear test was performed to compare the bond strength of the restorations to the tooth surface. The marginal fit values measured for the 3D-printed and CAD/CAM onlay restorations were found to be at clinically acceptable levels (p > 0.05). According to the microshear test results, the CAD/CAM group had the highest bond strength values before (34.82 MPa) and after (26.87 MPa) thermal cycling (p < 0.05), while the 3D-printed and conventionally produced onlays had similar results (p < 0.05). 3D printing technology is a promising option for indirect restorations; however, the post-production phase is as crucial as the printing and cementation phases.

Objectives: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess and compare the marginal and internal fit of machine-milled crowns designed using three different CAD software programs. Materials and methods: Digital impressions of the master zirconia casts containing the prepared molar were obtained using an intraoral scanner. The obtained standard tessellation language (STL) files were imported into three CAD software programs (Multi-CAD, Blue-Sky CAD, and InLab), and crown designs were generated. Crown design digital STL files were used to mill crowns with a five-axis dental milling machine. The internal and marginal fits of the fabricated crowns over the master-prepared tooth were assessed using the triple-scan protocol and digital analysis techniques. The 3D marginal and internal fit values of the fabricated crowns from the designs generated by the three CAD programs were evaluated and statistically compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey's tests (α = 0.05). Results: There were no significant differences in the internal fit of the crowns designed by the three CAD programs (p > 0.05). However, there were significant differences in the mean marginal fit (p = 0.009) of the crowns. The marginal fit values for the InLab-designed crowns were significantly better than those for Multi-CAD (p = 0.03) and Blue-Sky CAD (p = 0.012) groups. Conclusions: All three CAD programs can design clinically acceptable crowns in terms of internal and marginal fit. InLab crowns outperformed the Multi-CAD and Blue-Sky CAD programs in terms of marginal fit. Clinical relevance: It is critical to test the ability of newly released CAD programs to design acceptable virtual crowns that can be transformed into actual crowns with optimal marginal and internal fit to existing clinical tooth preparations/conditions to ensure the high technical quality and long-term success of fabricated crowns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We considered the possibility of reducing industrial waste by fabricating and reusing dental models prepared using a fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printer and polylactic acid (PLA) filaments. The purpose of this study was to verify the accuracy of models fabricated using FDM and PLA. Methods: The same provisional crown was used to check the marginal fit on PLA models prepared using an intraoral scanner (IOS) and FDM, plaster models made with silicone impression material and plaster, and resin models prepared using an IOS and stereolithography apparatus (SLA) 3D printer. The marginal fit was measured using micro-computed tomography at four points on the tooth: the buccal center (B), palatal center (P), mesial center (M), and distal center (D) points. Results: At point B, the marginal gaps were 118 ± 21.7, 62 ± 16.4, and 50 ± 26.5 μm for the PLA, resin, and plaster models, respectively, with a significant difference between the PLA model and the other two. However, the marginal gap at all other measurement points was not significantly different between the models (P > 0.05). Conclusions: We compared the accuracy of the models fabricated using the FDM, SLA, and conventional methods. The combination of FDM and PLA filaments showed no significant differences from the other models, except at point B, indicating its usefulness. Therefore, FDM and PLA may become necessary materials for dental treatment in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to examine the correlation between the finish line designs and the marginal adaptation of nonprecious metal alloy coping produced by different digital manufacturing methods. Materials and methods. Nonprecious metal alloy copings were made respectively from each master model with three different methods; SLS, milling and casting by computer aided design and computer aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM). Twelve copings were made by each method resulting in 72 copings in total. The measurement was conducted at 40 determined reference points along the circumferential margin with the confocal laser scanning microscope at magnification ×150. Results. Mean values of marginal gap of laser sintered copings were 11.8 ± 7.4 μm for deep chamfer margin and 6.3 ± 3.5 μm for rounded shoulder margin and the difference between them was statistically significant (P < .0001). Mean values of marginal gap of casted copings were 18.8 ± 20.2 μm for deep chamfer margin and 33 ± 20.5 μm for rounded shoulder margin and the difference between them was significant (P = .0004). Conclusion. Within the limitation of this study, the following conclusions were drawn. 1. The variation of finish line design influences the marginal adaptation of laser sintered metal coping and casted metal coping. 2. Laser sintered copings with rounded shoulder margin had better marginal fit than deep chamfer margin. 3. Casted copings with deep chamfer margin had better marginal fit than rounded shoulder margin. 4. According to the manufacturing method, SLS system showed the best marginal fit among three different methods. Casting and milling method followed that in order. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of International Journal of Computerized Dentistry is the property of Quintessence Publishing Company Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose: The effect of annealing and firing cycle on the adaptation of cobalt‐chromium (CoCr) restorations fabricated by additive manufacturing has been poorly documented. This study compared the marginal and internal fit of CoCr three‐unit fixed dental prostheses before and after firing cycles. Material and methods: The first right maxillary premolar (MP) and molar (MM) on a typodont model, were prepared with a circumferential 1.2 mm chamfer, 2 mm occlusal reduction, and total taper of 8 degrees, to receive 3‐unit fixed dental prostheses (FDP). After the framework design, 20 framework specimens were fabricated using CoCr metal powder by selective laser melting. The replica technique was used for marginal and internal fit measurements in mesiodistal and buccolingual planes. The specimens were submitted to an annealing process, and to ceramic firing protocol. Measurements were repeated after each firing cycle. The data were compared by using Levene test, t‐test, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) (α = 0.05). Results: A significant difference was found in the total intaglio surface discrepancy between the 3 treatments. The annealing treatment induced a statistical difference in the discrepancy value compared to the as printed state (p = 0.028). A significant difference was detected between the initial manufacturing phase and the ceramic layering firing cycle (p = 0.003). Conclusions: Firing cycles induced an alteration of the frameworks adaptation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Several studies have compared digital intraoral scanners and conventional impressions. The accuracy of these two methods in terms of marginal accuracy of lithium disilicate crowns is not well‐established, yet. The purpose of this study was to systematically review available publications on marginal fit of single‐unit, full‐coverage, tooth‐supported lithium disilicate restorations. Methods: Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Scopus were electronically searched along with a manual search. After critical appraisal, data from selected studies were extracted and mean marginal difference with a 95% confidence interval was calculated. Meta‐analysis of the collected data was conducted using STATA software. Results: The meta‐analysis revealed similar marginal gap values in intraoral scanners with conventional groups (p>0.05) and in intraoral scanners with extraoral canners (p>0.05). Conclusion: No significant difference was seen between digital and conventional impressions or intra‐ and extraoral scanners for marginal accuracy of lithium disilicate crowns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]