Search

Context.--Multiple articles and surveys in the literature suggest that medical students find a career in pathology undesirable and believe it is disproportionately focused primarily on the autopsy. Objective.--To measure the effect of applied interventions on medical student attitudes about the field of pathology. Design.--This prospective study involving medical students from first through fourth year was conducted as a pilot study in 2 medical schools in the United States. A 2-part anonymous survey regarding interest in pathology as a career and familiarity with the specialty using a 10-point scale was given to first- and second-year medical students before and after they listened to a 10-minute pathology career presentation. The same survey was given to third and fourth-year medical students before and after a 4-week pathology elective. Results.--A total of 121 and 83 students responded to the survey before and after the intervention, respectively. Of the 121 students who responded to the survey before the intervention, 106 (87.6%) had not spent significant time in a pathology laboratory before the intervention. The majority of responses in interest in career, job responsibilities, and features of pathologists before and after the intervention demonstrated a statistically significant difference (P < .001). We compared survey scores of presentation versus 4-week rotation groups before and after the intervention. Students who experienced the presentation did not differ from students who experienced the rotation in the majority of questions related to interest in career, job responsibilities, and features of pathologists. Conclusions.--Our study suggests that pathology exposure strategies can have a beneficial effect on student perceptions of the field and consideration of a career in pathology. Overall, the presentation intervention seemed to have the greatest effect on the first- and second-year students., Through in-depth study of the fundamental principles of diseases, with special focus on associated structural and functional changes, pathology integrates the basic sciences with the clinical practice of medicine and [...]

Background: There is great variability among individual patients in platelet inhibition after aspirin intake. Aspirin resistance has been associated with a higher incidence of ischemic events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The optimal antiplatelet therapy in aspirin-resistant patients undergoing PCI is unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether aggressive antiplatelet therapy would reduce ischemic events in aspirin-resistant patients after PCI., Methods: A total of 330 patients undergoing PCI (with bivalirudin) were screened for aspirin responsiveness. The resulting 36 aspirin-resistant patients were randomized into two arms: 1) conventional strategy patients received 325 mg aspirin orally and a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel at the time of the procedure; and 2) aggressive strategy patients received similar amounts of aspirin and clopidogrel, with the addition of an intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor bolus intraprocedurally. The primary outcome was an elevation of cardiac enzymes within 24 hours post procedure. The secondary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiac events including death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis and urgent revascularization, and bleeding up to 30 days., Results: Primary outcome occurred in 22% of the conventional strategy group and 11% of the aggressive strategy group (p = 0.36). The secondary outcome was reached in 27.8% of the conventional group and 5.5% of the aggressive strategy group (p = 0.17), which is suggestive of a statistical trend toward more ischemic events with conventional therapy. Importantly, there were 2 cases of definite stent thrombosis in the conventional strategy group., Conclusion: In aspirin-resistant patients, aggressive antiplatelet therapy tended to show better outcomes after PCI, without an increase in bleeding. These findings need validation in a large, randomized study.

Background: Primary stenting during acute myocardial infarction (MI) is often complicated by slow-flow/no-reflow due to distal embolization of intracoronary thrombus. The AngioJet thrombectomy catheter has been utilized in this setting in order to limit distal embolization and improve flow. The effect of AngioJet during primary stenting in acute MI with high-grade thrombus (greater than or equal to grade 3, as per thrombolysis in MI [TIMI] classification) is not known., Methods: We analyzed 95 consecutive acute MI patients with thrombus grade > or = 3 who underwent primary stenting with AngioJet (n = 52) and without AngioJet (n = 43) for epicardial and microvascular flow, and followed for 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and 1-year survival. Baseline characteristics and in-hospital events were obtained from the interventional database. Two independent operators analyzed pre- and post-procedure TIMI flow rates, corrected TIMI frame count (CTFC) and TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG)., Results: Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups. AngioJet use was associated with better TIMI flow, TMP grade, CTFC and a trend towards lower 30-day and 1-year MACE. Use of AngioJet thrombectomy prior to stenting of acute MI patients with high-grade thrombus improves epicardial and microvascular flow, with a trend toward better short- and long-term outcome.